Next Article in Journal
Drivers of Old-Age Dependence and Long-Term Care Usage in Switzerland—A Structural Equation Model Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Persistence of Bank Credit Default Swap Spreads
Open AccessArticle

Bigger Is Not Always Safer: A Critical Analysis of the Subadditivity Assumption for Coherent Risk Measures

Faculty of Business Management and Economics, University of Wuerzburg, Sanderring 2, D-97070 Wuerzburg, Germany
Risks 2019, 7(3), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7030091
Received: 25 June 2019 / Revised: 16 August 2019 / Accepted: 20 August 2019 / Published: 26 August 2019
This paper provides a critical analysis of the subadditivity axiom, which is the key condition for coherent risk measures. Contrary to the subadditivity assumption, bank mergers can create extra risk. We begin with an analysis how a merger affects depositors, junior or senior bank creditors, and bank owners. Next it is shown that bank mergers can result in higher payouts having to be made by the deposit insurance scheme. Finally, we demonstrate that if banks are interconnected via interbank loans, a bank merger could lead to additional contagion risks. We conclude that the subadditivity assumption should be rejected, since a subadditive risk measure, by definition, cannot account for such increased risks. View Full-Text
Keywords: coherent risk measures; subadditivity; bank mergers; regulatory capital coherent risk measures; subadditivity; bank mergers; regulatory capital
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Rau-Bredow, H. Bigger Is Not Always Safer: A Critical Analysis of the Subadditivity Assumption for Coherent Risk Measures. Risks 2019, 7, 91.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop