Next Article in Journal
Novel Compound Heterozygous Variants in TBCD Gene Associated with Infantile Neurodegenerative Encephalopathy
Previous Article in Journal
Spontaneous Closure of the Arterial Duct after Transcatheter Closure Attempt in Preterm Infants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/children8121139
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Reducing the Weight of Spinal Pain in Children and Adolescents

by
Thorvaldur S. Palsson
1,*,
Alessandro Andreucci
2,
Christian Lund Straszek
1,2,3,
Michael Skovdal Rathleff
1,2 and
Morten Hoegh
1
1
Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
2
Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
3
Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, 9800 Aalborg, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2021, 8(12), 1139; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121139
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 10 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 5 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Spinal pain in adults is a significant burden, from an individual and societal perspective. According to epidemiologic data, spinal pain is commonly found in children and adolescents, where evidence emerging over the past decade has demonstrated that spinal pain in adults can, in many cases, be traced back to childhood or adolescence. Nevertheless, very little focus has been on how to best manage spinal pain in younger age groups. The purpose of this article is to put the focus on spinal pain in children and adolescents and highlight how and where these problems emerge and how they are commonly dealt with. We will draw on findings from the relevant literature from adults to highlight potential common pathways that can be used in the management of spinal pain in children and adolescents. The overall focus is on how healthcare professionals can best support children and adolescents and their caregivers in making sense of spinal pain (when present) and support them in the self-management of the condition.

1. Introduction

The burden of spinal pain has pandemic proportions, and it is the leading cause of disability in adults [1]. Now, evidence clearly points to the fact that long-lasting spinal pain seems to start in childhood or adolescence and is associated with an increased risk of spinal pain later in life [2,3,4]. There is no single cause for non-specific spinal pain but, in most cases, it is related to several biomedical, psychological, and social factors [5].
Depending on the definition of spinal pain, the condition affects somewhere between 6–39% of children and adolescents annually [6,7,8], where the prevalence rates and care-seeking behavior seems to gradually increase from childhood until late adolescence/early adulthood [9,10]. In addition to seeking care from healthcare professionals, the age group commonly resorts to passive approaches, e.g., using pain killers for self-management, as up to 30% of adolescents use pain medication on a weekly basis [11]. Seemingly, this strategy does not only stem from the need to reduce pain but also a means of managing emotional distress [12]. The multifactorial nature of pain is, in fact, evident when considering that those who use pain medication on a regular basis, have signs of widespread pain, report poor sleep quality, have lower self-esteem and are frequently absent from school [13,14]. Although this does not oppose the use of pain medication when indicated, it does suggest the need for a management strategy that encompasses the multiple domains potentially involved, where pain is just a part of the problem. Such strategies, e.g., dependency on healthcare professionals or pain medication for pain relief, are known to predict greater risk of sick leave in adults with back pain [15]. Based on the above, it may seem that non-specific spinal pain in children and adolescents is managed either passively or not at all.
Children and adolescents are not small adults. However, very little evidence exists of how to best manage spinal pain among the youngest patients. For this reason, we summarize the relevant research findings and examine whether knowledge thereof can inform management approaches in children and adolescents. We will draw on themes that are commonly focused on in the management of spinal pain in adults. The aim is to highlight some of the knowledge available from the literature from non-specific spinal pain and, based on this, suggest future directions to promote self-management of spinal pain amongst children and adolescents.

2. Understanding the World through the Eyes of Adults—The Role of Unhelpful Messaging

It is human nature to seek an underlying cause of a pain problem [16]. In the parent–child relationship, an initial assessment and management strategy is often (and rightfully so) conducted by the parent or guardian. In this regard, however, it is important to acknowledge that several misconceptions exist in relation to spinal pain in adult populations. One is the assumed relationship between biomechanical loading (e.g., posture) and spinal pain. Adults often perceive posture as being an important factor in their back pain [17], where extended, upright positions are generally considered the most correct way of sitting [17,18]. Interestingly, however, it seems that spinal pain is more strongly associated with, for example, emotional distress and conduct problems [19] than the spinal curvature in children and adolescents [20,21,22]. Experimental studies have shown that when compared with asymptomatic controls, adults with back pain tend to have decreased [23,24] or excessive [25] movement variability, generate excessive force via their trunk muscles when performing low-load tasks [26,27] and continue to use the same strategy when fatigue sets in in the trunk muscles [28]. It may therefore seem counterintuitive to promote certain postures when it seems to be the strategy to maintain the posture, which is the problem instead of the posture itself. Therefore, healthcare professionals should encourage children and adolescents to adopt comfortable postures (irrespective of spinal curvature) with reassurance that sitting in various ways is safe and may in fact provide symptom relief [29].
Often, prolonged sitting in front of a computer or using a smartphone, are considered the culprits when trying to find explanations for spinal pain in children and adolescents [30,31]. Although it may be tempting to jump to such conclusions, it is important to consider what the child is not doing instead of playing videogames or using the smartphone, i.e., being physically active. Another example is school bags (their weight, shape, and design). Often the recommendations regarding the choice of school bags are based on the weight of the bag not exceeding 10% of the child’s body weight, although a recent meta-analysis [32], including data from over 9000 children, did not find evidence to support this claim. Furthermore, Haselgrove et al. [33] found that adolescents who carried their schoolbag for more than 30 min per day, but used an inactive transportation method (e.g., were driven or took the bus) were more likely to report spinal pain than those using an active way of getting to school (walking/cycling), even though they carried their schoolbag for an equally long time. The underlying theme, therefore, seems to be that inactivity, rather than posture and load, appears to be an important contributing factor to spinal pain in children and adolescents.
There is convincing evidence suggesting that physical activity may reduce the risk of recurrent episodes or chronic spinal pain in adults [34] and may, therefore, serve as “protection” against the pain condition. This may relate to both physiological tissue adaptations to the exercise and also less fear/worrying of getting hurt, as transient soreness/fatigue is a common part of physical activity and exercise. A relationship between lower physical activity levels in adolescents and higher risk of pain specific to the spine [35], and in general [36], seems to exist, indicating that this may be a significant contributing factor to spinal pain in this age group. With this in mind, introducing more physical activity into everyday life, e.g., based on WHO’s recommendations (www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity (accessed on 12 July 2021)), instead of banning certain activities, may be a more viable and sustainable strategy to manage the negative aspects (including pain) of a sedentary lifestyle.
In summary, the vast majority of all spinal pain is benign and multifactorial, and, for adolescents, it is not abnormal to experience discomfort from sustained postures and/or carrying heavy loads. Importantly, the discomfort does not equate to an injury [37], nor does it pose any risk of future damage, although data suggests that pain is a recurrent condition for most people. From adult populations, we know that physical activity has the capacity to reduce spinal pain, or the burden of spinal pain, and it seems possible that this is also true for adolescents.

3. Attributing Musculoskeletal Symptoms to Damage—What Can We Learn from Adult Populations?

Back pain is commonly considered a result of damage to the back due to the flawed belief that the back is fragile and needs to be protected [38,39,40,41]. Studies investigating patients’ views of their own condition, have shown that adults who harbor pathoanatomical views of their spinal pain, report higher levels of disability [42]. In fact, it seems that difficulty in abandoning biomedical beliefs related to back pain is a barrier for recovery [43]. It is understandable that patients seek answers from healthcare professionals regarding underlying reasons for their pain, especially when it persists [44]. However, in spinal pain, as in most other pain conditions, a certain level of diagnostic uncertainty exists where the underlying cause cannot be identified, despite common beliefs hereof [45]. If the explanations provided are biased towards a potential underlying pathology and/or weakness, they may negatively affect the prognosis by promoting movement-related fear [46,47,48]. Indeed, psychological, and social factors are known to play important roles in the development and persistence of pain [49,50,51]. Moreover, children’s thoughts and beliefs, about pain are influenced by the interpretations of parents and other family members [52,53]. Parents/caregivers, as well as the child/adolescent, can struggle with the social consequences of persistent or intense episodic spinal pain, such as despair, fear and distress related to both stigma (e.g., “legitimacy” of a pain-related diagnosis) [54] and the uncertainty of how the disease will influence the future life of child and adolescent patients [55]. Often, the dominant belief is that spinal pain has a particular medical explanation, with less focus on emotional and behavioral factors [56]. With this in mind, it is evident that all strategies aimed at supporting recovery need to address child and parent/caregiver thoughts and beliefs regarding the underlying cause, prognosis and means of management. In adults, the risk of poorer outcomes increases if the psychological and social aspects of spinal pain are left unmanaged [57,58,59]. Furthermore, they seem to mediate disability after an initial episode of spinal pain in adults [60,61,62]. It is therefore equally important to address these factors in children and adolescents affected by spinal pain.
Based on the above, several factors (alone and in combination) can contribute to persistent spinal pain in children and adolescents. As for the parent/caregiver, this highlights the need to address the spinal pain as a lived experience, i.e., to understand how pain affects the child/adolescent and what values they attribute to the pain. Furthermore, it seems that education regarding the nature of spinal pain is important and may in fact be most beneficial for children and adolescents experiencing their first episodes of spinal pain [63]. Patient education on spinal pain should address misconceptions about the relationship between pain and tissue damage, and provide coherent, contemporary explanations of the multifactorial nature of spinal pain. Moreover, as spinal pain is currently considered an episodic condition [5], advice on self-management strategies to reduce or control future pain episodes should be included as first line treatment options [5]. In line with this, a four-step model was recently suggested [64] with the aim of guiding clinicians in the management of non-specific musculoskeletal pain conditions. Table 1 illustrates how this model is adapted to spinal pain in children/adolescents.

4. Moving Forwards—Strategies to Modify the Trajectory

In the current management of back pain, several evidence-based national guidelines exist to support clinical decision making [65] for the treatment/management of spinal pain. Rightfully so, as it gives clinicians freedom to choose and adapt interventions to the individual. In that respect, evidence favors advice, education, exercise (supervised and unsupervised) and cognitive behavioral therapy for spinal pain, whereas pharmacotherapy, manual therapy and other (commonly used) therapies are considered second-line or adjuncts [5]. However, no interventions seem to have a superior effect [66]. These guidelines are based on findings from adult populations, which is why any given approach needs to be appropriately adapted to the child/adolescent. It is important to note that the prognosis is generally good, even though people are left to self-manage [67]. Nevertheless, the onset of spinal pain is not always followed by a gradual return to normal as various patterns of recovery/persistence of pain are seen across individuals [68,69]. Therefore, deciding which intervention to use can only be carried out following a thorough assessment, including identification of the potential underlying driver(s) of the pain condition. Here, clinicians need to be mindful of not getting in the way of recovery and that the management strategy focuses on promoting self-management, instead of passive dependency on, for example, healthcare providers and/or medication.

5. Aligning Clinical Messaging to Contemporary Pain Science

Several processes contribute to the pain experience [70]. For example, acute damage to the structures of the spine inevitably involves the nociceptive system, conveying signals from the periphery to the central nervous system. But there is more to it than just nociceptive signaling [71]. As with other pain conditions, people of all ages who experience spinal pain try to make sense of their pain by drawing on previous experiences, and social and cultural contexts. A poorer outcome can be expected amongst those who believe their back pain will persist, have a perception of serious consequences and experience limited control of their pain [72]. In contrast, adults who succeed in reducing pain-related fear and gaining more control over their back pain, attribute this to an ability to be able to make (more) sense of their pain [73]. Explicitly, this indicates that by gaining insight into your own condition, what it (the pain) means, what causes the pain and future perspectives, this helps people to self-manage their pain condition. Directly extrapolating these factors from adult populations to children and adolescents may, however, not be possible as the cognitive skills, previous experiences, learning and social contexts (e.g., work) are considerably different between adults and younger populations. However, spinal pain remains influenced by the child’s social context and culture and may, to some degree, substitute their own lack of experience (e.g., being dependent of their surroundings to provide the information needed).
The common sense model [74] describes five broad dimensions that adults use to give meaning to a pain experience [73]:
(i)
The identity of the pain—“Where is my pain coming from?”
(ii)
The cause of the pain—“Why does my back hurt?”
(iii)
What are the consequences of my pain?—“How will the back pain affect my life?”
(iv)
How well can I control my pain?—“What can I do to make it go away?”
(v)
How long will the pain last?—“When will it stop?”
Although not designed to replace subjective assessment in a clinical context, the model could form the backbone of the interview with the child/adolescent and thus provide insight into the lived experience of pain. This insight may then serve as a reference point for the patient’s education, which needs to address individual thoughts, beliefs, and emotions. An example of how the adolescent can be supported in making sense of their back pain is provided in Table 2.

6. Supporting Children and Adolescents in the Self-Management of Spinal Pain

Considering the prevailing belief amongst the general public that the back is fragile and that pain is related to a structural flaw [38,39,40,41], it is clear that any intervention addressing spinal pain in children/adolescents, needs to involve the parents/caregivers. A parent’s lack of understanding and/or appreciation of emotional and cognitive factors in relation to pain, may limit the acceptance of a multimodal approach, potentially resulting in a poorer outcome. It is therefore pivotal that the healthcare provider not only understands and supports the child or adolescent but, at the same time, engages parents/caregivers to provide messages consistent with the assessment findings and management strategy of choice. From a healthcare provider’s perspective, it is important that when communicating clinical findings (their meaning and potential consequences), they are consistent with contemporary evidence. Importantly, patient education does not mean to educate the patient to the same professional level as the healthcare provider. Rather, it is to provide the child and caregivers with simple and individually tailored explanations that are aligned with, and supported by, contemporary science. Such an approach facilitates the transition from expert-driven management towards patient-centered care and supports patients and caregivers in making sense of the pain and provides them with tools to aid them in the self-management of recurrent, benign spinal pain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: all authors; Methodology: T.S.P., A.A., C.L.S., M.S.R. and M.H.; Software: Not applicable; Validation: Not applicable; Formal analysis: Not applicable; Formal analysis: Not applicable; Investigation: Not applicable; Resources: all authors; Data curation: Not applicable; Writing—original draft preparation: T.S.P. and M.H.; Writing, review and editing: all authors; Visualization: T.S.P.; Supervision: T.S.P. and M.H.; Project administration: T.S.P.; Funding acquisition: Not applicable. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This communication paper received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, A.; March, L.; Zheng, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Blyth, F.M.; Smith, E.; Buchbinder, R.; Hoy, D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 299. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Coenen, P.; Smith, A.; Paananen, M.; O’Sullivan, P.; Beales, D.; Straker, L. Trajectories of Low Back Pain From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. Arthritis Rheum. 2017, 69, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hestbaek, L.; Leboeuf-Yde, C.; Kyvik, K.O.; Manniche, C. The course of low back pain from adolescence to adulthood: Eight-year follow-up of 9600 twins. Spine 2006, 31, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Coenen, P.; Smith, A.; Kent, P.; Harris, M.; Linton, S.J.; Pransky, G.; Beales, D.; O’Sullivan, P.; Straker, L. The association of adolescent spinal-pain-related absenteeism with early adulthood work absenteeism: A six-year follow-up data from a population-based cohort. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2018, 44, 521–529. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hartvigsen, J.; Hancock, M.; Kongsted, A.; Louw, Q.; Ferreira, M.L.; Genevay, S.; Hoy, D.; Karppinen, J.; Pransky, G.; Sieper, J.; et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018, 391, 2356–2367. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dissing, K.B.; Hestbæk, L.; Hartvigsen, J.; Williams, C.; Kamper, S.; Boyle, E.; Wedderkopp, N. Spinal pain in Danish school children—How often and how long? The CHAMPS Study-DK. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2017, 18, 1–13. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Swain, M.S.; Henschke, N.; Kamper, S.J.; Gobina, I.; Ottová-Jordan, V.; Maher, C.G. An international survey of pain in adolescents. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 447. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gobina, I.; Villberg, J.; Välimaa, R.; Tynjälä, J.; Whitehead, R.; Cosma, A.; Brooks, F.; Cavallo, F.; Ng, K.; de Matos, M.G.; et al. Prevalence of self-reported chronic pain among adolescents: Evidence from 42 countries and regions. Eur. J. Pain 2019, 23, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kjaer, P.; Wedderkopp, N.; Korsholm, L.; Leboeuf-Yde, C. Prevalence and tracking of back pain from childhood to adolescence. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2011, 12, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bhayankaram, N.P.; Lacey, R.J.; Barnett, L.A.; Jordan, K.P.; Dunn, K.M. Musculoskeletal consultations from childhood to adulthood: A longitudinal study. J. Public Health 2020, 42, e428–e434. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rune, J.; Eva, H.; Catherine, J.H.; Dawit, S.A.; Kristine, B.A.; Siv, S. Use of Over-The-Counter Analgesics for Pain and Psychological Distress Among Adolescents: A Mixed Effects Approach in Cross-Sectional Survey Data From Norway. BMC Public Health 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kiza, A.H.; Manworren, R.C.; Cong, X.; Starkweather, A.; Kelley, P.W. Over-The-Counter Analgesics: A Meta-Synthesis of Pain Self-Management in Adolescents. Pain Manag. Nurs. 2021, 22, 439–445. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Skarstein, S.; Rosvold, E.O.; Helseth, S.; Kvarme, L.G.; Holager, T.; Småstuen, M.C.; Lagerløv, P. High-frequency use of over-the-counter analgesics among adolescents: Reflections of an emerging difficult life, a cross-sectional study. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2014, 28, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Skarstein, S.; Lagerløv, P.; Kvarme, L.G.; Helseth, S. High use of over-the-counter analgesic; possible warnings of reduced quality of life in adolescents—A qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2016, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Dawson, A.P.; Schluter, P.J.; Hodges, P.W.; Stewart, S.; Turner, C. Fear of movement, passive coping, manual handling, and severe or radiating pain increase the likelihood of sick leave due to low back pain. Pain 2011, 152, 1517–1524. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Petrie, K.J.; Weinman, J.A. Why illness perceptions matter. Clin. Med. 2006, 6, 536–539. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. O’Sullivan, K.; Keeffe, M.O.; O’Sullivan, L.; O’Sullivan, P.; Dankaerts, W. Perceptions of sitting posture among members of the community, both with and without non-specific chronic low back pain. Man. Ther. 2013, 18, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Korakakis, V.; O’Sullivan, K.; Whiteley, R.; O’Sullivan, P.B.; Korakaki, A.; Kotsifaki, A.; Tsaklis, P.V.; Tsiokanos, A.; Giakas, G. Notions of “optimal” posture are loaded with meaning. Perceptions of sitting posture among asymptomatic members of the community. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2021, 51, 102310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jones, G.T.; Watson, K.D.; Silman, A.J.; Symmons, D.; Macfarlane, G. Predictors of Low Back Pain in British Schoolchildren: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. Pediatrics 2003, 111, 822–828. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richards, K.V.; Beales, D.J.; Smith, A.J.; O’Sullivan, P.B.; Straker, L.M. Neck Posture Clusters and Their Association With Biopsychosocial Factors and Neck Pain in Australian Adolescents. Phys. Ther. 2016, 96, 1576–1587. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Diepenmaat, A.C.; Van Der Wal, M.; De Vet, H.; HiraSing, R. Neck/Shoulder, Low Back, and Arm Pain in Relation to Computer Use, Physical Activity, Stress, and Depression Among Dutch Adolescents. Pediatrics 2006, 117, 412–416. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. O’Sullivan, P.; Beales, D.; Jensen, L.; Murray, K.; Myers, T. Characteristics of chronic non-specific musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents attending a rheumatology outpatients clinic: A cross-sectional study. Pediatr. Rheumatol. 2011, 9, 3. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Falla, D.; Gizzi, L.; Tschapek, M.; Erlenwein, J.; Petzke, F. Reduced task-induced variations in the distribution of activity across back muscle regions in individuals with low back pain. Pain 2014, 155, 944–953. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Falla, D.; Gizzi, L.; Parsa, H.; Dieterich, A.; Petzke, F. People With Chronic Neck Pain Walk With a Stiffer Spine. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2017, 47, 268–277. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ippersiel, P.; Robbins, S.; Preuss, R. Movement variability in adults with low back pain during sit-to-stand-to-sit. Clin. Biomech. 2018, 58, 90–95. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lima, M.; Ferreira, A.S.; Reis, F.J.J.; Paes, V.; Meziat-Filho, N. Chronic low back pain and back muscle activity during functional tasks. Gait Posture 2018, 61, 250–256. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sheeran, L.; Sparkes, V.; Caterson, B.; Busse-Morris, M.; van Deursen, R. Spinal Position Sense and Trunk Muscle Activity During Sitting and Standing in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine 2012, 37, E486–E495. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bauer, C.; Rast, F.; Ernst, M.; Meichtry, A.; Kool, J.; Rissanen, S.; Suni, J.; Kankaanpää, M. The effect of muscle fatigue and low back pain on lumbar movement variability and complexity. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2017, 33, 94–102. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Slater, D.; Korakakis, V.; O’Sullivan, P.; Nolan, D.; O’Sullivan, K. “Sit Up Straight”: Time to Re-evaluate. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2019, 49, 562–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. David, D.; Giannini, C.; Chiarelli, F.; Mohn, A. Text Neck Syndrome in Children and Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1565. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Straker, L.; Pollock, C.; Maslen, B. Principles for the wise use of computers by children. Ergonomics 2009, 52, 1386–1401. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Calvo-Muñoz, I.; Kovacs, F.M.; Roqué, M.; Seco-Calvo, J. The association between the weight of schoolbags and low back pain among schoolchildren: A systematic review, meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur. J. Pain 2020, 24, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Haselgrove, C.; Straker, L.; Smith, A.; O’Sullivan, P.; Perry, M.; Sloan, N. Perceived school bag load, duration of carriage, and method of transport to school are associated with spinal pain in adolescents: An observational study. Aust. J. Physiother. 2008, 54, 193–200. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shiri, R.; Falah-Hassani, K. Does leisure time physical activity protect against low back pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 prospective cohort studies. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 51, 1410–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Scarabottolo, C.; Pinto, R.; Oliveira, C.B.; Zanuto, E.F.; Cardoso, J.; Christofaro, D.G.D. Back and neck pain prevalence and their association with physical inactivity domains in adolescents. Eur. Spine J. 2017, 26, 2274–2280. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Vierola, A.; Suominen, A.L.; Lindi, V.; Viitasalo, A.; Ikävalko, T.; Lintu, N.; Väistö, J.; Kellokoski, J.; Närhi, M.; Lakka, T. Associations of Sedentary Behavior, Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Body Fat Content with Pain Conditions in Children: The Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children Study. J. Pain 2016, 17, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hoegh, M.; Stanton, T.; George, S.; Lyng, K.D.; Vistrup, S.; Rathleff, M.S. Infographic. Pain or injury? Why differentiation matters in exercise and sports medicine. Br. J. Sports Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moffett, J.A.K.; Newbronner, E.; Waddell, G.; Croucher, K.; Spear, S. Public perceptions about low back pain and its management: A gap between expectations and reality? Health Expect. 2000, 3, 161–168. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ihlebaek, C.; Eriksen, H.R. Are the “myths” of low back pain alive in the general Norwegian population? Scand. J. Public Health 2003, 31, 395–398. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gross, D.P.; Ferrari, R.; Russell, A.S.; Battié, M.C.; Schopflocher, D.; Hu, R.W.; Waddell, G.; Buchbinder, R. A Population-Based Survey of Back Pain Beliefs in Canada. Spine 2006, 31, 2142–2145. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Darlow, B.; Perry, M.; Stanley, J.; Mathieson, F.; Melloh, M.; Baxter, D.; Dowell, A. Cross-sectional survey of attitudes and beliefs about back pain in New Zealand. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e004725. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Briggs, A.M.; Jordan, J.E.; Buchbinder, R.; Burnett, A.F.; O’Sullivan, P.B.; Chua, J.Y.; Osborne, R.H.; Straker, L.M. Health literacy and beliefs among a community cohort with and without chronic low back pain. Pain 2010, 150, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bunzli, S.; McEvoy, S.; Dankaerts, W.; O’Sullivan, P.; O’Sullivan, K. Patient Perspectives on Participation in Cognitive Functional Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain. Phys. Ther. 2016, 96, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lim, Y.Z.; Chou, L.; Au, R.T.; Seneviwickrama, K.M.D.; Cicuttini, F.; Briggs, A.M.; Sullivan, K.; Urquhart, D.M.; Wluka, A.E. People with low back pain want clear, consistent and personalised information on prognosis, treatment options and self-management strategies: A systematic review. J. Physiother. 2019, 65, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sharma, S.; Traeger, A.C.; Reed, B.; Hamilton, M.; O’Connor, D.A.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Bonner, C.; Buchbinder, R.; Maher, C.G. Clinician and patient beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain: A systematic qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e037820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Darlow, B. Beliefs about back pain: The confluence of client, clinician and community. Int. J. Osteopat. Med. 2016, 20, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bunzli, S.; Smith, A.; Schütze, R.; O’Sullivan, P. Beliefs underlying pain-related fear and how they evolve: A qualitative investigation in people with chronic back pain and high pain-related fear. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e008847. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sloan, T.J.; Walsh, D.A. Explanatory and Diagnostic Labels and Perceived Prognosis in Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine 2010, 35, E1120–E1125. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Leino-Arjas, P.; Rajaleid, K.; Mekuria, G.; Nummi, T.; Virtanen, P.; Hammarström, A. Trajectories of musculoskeletal pain from adolescence to middle age: The role of early depressive symptoms, a 27-year follow-up of the Northern Swedish Cohort. Pain 2018, 159, 67–74. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Aili, K.; Campbell, P.; Michaleff, Z.A.; Strauss, V.Y.; Jordan, K.P.; Bremander, A.; Croft, P.; Bergman, S. Long-term trajectories of chronic musculoskeletal pain: A 21-year prospective cohort latent class analysis. Pain 2021, 162, 1511–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gatchel, R.J.; Peng, Y.B.; Peters, M.; Fuchs, P.; Turk, D.C. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133, 581–624. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Palermo, T.M.; Chambers, C.T. Parent and family factors in pediatric chronic pain and disability: An integrative approach. Pain 2005, 119, 1–4. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Logan, D.E.; Guite, J.; Sherry, D.D.; Rose, J.B. Adolescent–Parent Relationships in the Context of Adolescent Chronic Pain Conditions. Clin. J. Pain 2006, 22, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jordan, A.; Eccleston, C.; Osborn, M. Being a parent of the adolescent with complex chronic pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Eur. J. Pain 2007, 11, 49. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Heffernan, M.; Wilson, C.; Keating, K.; McCarthy, K. “Why Isn’t It Going Away?”: A Qualitative Exploration of Worry and Pain Experiences in Adolescents with Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2021, 22, 459–469. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Guite, J.W.; Logan, D.E.; McCue, R.; Sherry, D.D.; Rose, J.B. Parental Beliefs and Worries Regarding Adolescent Chronic Pain. Clin. J. Pain 2009, 25, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wertli, M.M.; Rasmussen-Barr, E.; Weiser, S.; Bachmann, L.M.; Brunner, F. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review. Spine J. 2014, 14, 816–836.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wertli, M.M.; Eugster, R.; Held, U.; Steurer, J.; Kofmehl, R.; Weiser, S. Catastrophizing—A prognostic factor for outcome in patients with low back pain: A systematic review. Spine J. 2014, 14, 2639–2657. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wertli, M.M.; Rasmussen-Barr, E.; Held, U.; Weiser, S.; Bachmann, L.M.; Brunner, F. Fear-avoidance beliefs—A moderator of treatment efficacy in patients with low back pain: A systematic review. Spine J. 2014, 14, 2658–2678. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, H.; Hübscher, M.; Moseley, L.; Kamper, S.; Traeger, A.; Mansell, G.; McAuley, J. How does pain lead to disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies in people with back and neck pain. Pain 2015, 156, 988–997. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stevans, J.M.; Delitto, A.; Khoja, S.S.; Patterson, C.G.; Smith, C.N.; Schneider, M.J.; Freburger, J.K.; Greco, C.M.; Freel, J.A.; Sowa, G.A.; et al. Risk Factors Associated With Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain in US Patients Seeking Primary Care. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2037371. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Østerås, B.; Sigmundsson, H.; Haga, M. Perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain are prevalent and significantly associated in adolescents: An epidemiological cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ferreira, G.; Hancock, M. Recommendations for shaping the future of low back pain prevention research. Br. J. Sports Med. 2021, 55, 886–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Palsson, T.S.; Gibson, W.; Darlow, B.; Bunzli, S.; Lehman, G.; Rabey, M.; Moloney, N.; Vaegter, H.B.; Bagg, M.K.; Travers, M. Changing the Narrative in Diagnosis and Management of Pain in the Sacroiliac Joint Area. Phys. Ther. 2019, 99, 1511–1519. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Oliveira, C.B.; Maher, C.G.; Pinto, R.Z.; Traeger, A.C.; Lin, C.-W.C.; Chenot, J.-F.; van Tulder, M.; Koes, B.W. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: An updated overview. Eur. Spine J. 2018, 27, 2791–2803. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Malfliet, A.; Ickmans, K.; Huysmans, E.; Coppieters, I.; Willaert, W.; Van Bogaert, W.; Rheel, E.; Bilterys, T.; Van Wilgen, P.; Nijs, J. Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Costa, L.D.C.M.; Maher, C.G.; Hancock, M.J.; McAuley, J.H.; Herbert, R.D.; Costa, L.O. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: A meta-analysis. Can. Med Assoc. J. 2012, 184, E613–E624. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Dunn, K.M.; Campbell, P.; Jordan, K. Long-term trajectories of back pain: Cohort study with 7-year follow-up. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e003838. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Kongsted, A.; Kent, P.; Axén, I.; Downie, A.; Dunn, K.M. What have we learned from ten years of trajectory research in low back pain? BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. IASP. Part III: Pain Terms, A Current List with Definitions and Notes on Usage; IASP Press: Seattle, DX, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  71. Thacker, M.A.; Moseley, G.L. First-person neuroscience and the understanding of pain. Med. J. Aust. 2012, 196, 410–411. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Foster, N.E.; Bishop, A.; Thomas, E.; Main, C.; Horne, R.; Weinman, J.A.; Hay, E. Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: What are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome? Pain 2008, 136, 177–187. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bunzli, S.; Smith, A.; Schütze, R.; Lin, I.; O’Sullivan, P. Making Sense of Low Back Pain and Pain-Related Fear. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2017, 47, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Leventhal, H.; Brissette, I.; Leventhal, E.A. The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation of Health and Illness. In The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour; Cameron, L.D., Leventhal, H., Eds.; Taylor & Francis/Routledge: London, UK, 2003; pp. 42–65. (In English) [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. An overview of important building blocks for designing a strategy that supports self-management in children and adolescents with spinal pain.
Table 1. An overview of important building blocks for designing a strategy that supports self-management in children and adolescents with spinal pain.
StepsSuggestion for Implementation
  • Explain how pain works tailored to the individual and in alignment with contemporary evidence
Based on the assessment findings, explain how the individual’s perceived symptoms can be a result of a combination of biological processes (e.g., muscle fatigue) and the thoughts and beliefs we attach to it
2.
Constructively address unhelpful health beliefs (the child’s and parents’)
Provide information on how our body becomes stronger from external load (e.g., a schoolbag) where the demands sometimes exceed what we are capable of. When this happens, we may experience discomfort that is not related to an injury
3.
Promote reassurance regarding structural integrity of the spine
Our body is strong and is capable of amazing things. Even if we sustain our injury, it has the ability to heal and become as strong/stronger than before
4.
Design and discuss an active management plan that builds on points 1 to 3
The plan needs to actively engage the individual and to some degree include the functions/activities in daily life that are challenging. Initially, this can be done under supervision, but focus should be on strategies that support independence and the ability to self-manage and adapt the recommended strategies to everyday functions
Table
Table 2. An example of how the Common Sense Model can be used as a part of the assessment and management, if indicated by assessment findings.
Table 2. An example of how the Common Sense Model can be used as a part of the assessment and management, if indicated by assessment findings.
Pain/Discomfort from Carrying the School BagExample of Lived ExperienceHelpful MessagingUnhelpful Messaging
What is this pain?“My pain came when I walked to school with a heavy back”“Your back/neck/shoulders become tired from carrying the schoolbag. When this happens, they become sore. However, this is not dangerous and over time you will adapt by making your body more resilient to carrying your bag”“The schoolbag is too heavy for you. Because your body can’t handle such weight, you get pain”
What caused my pain?“I don’t know what caused my pain. Maybe I walked too fast or perhaps my back pack was way too heavy?”“Until you have built the resilience needed to carry your bag, your body needs to work extra hard for carrying the bag. This becomes better with training”“Muscles and joints can’t sustain the load from the schoolbag and therefore become sore”
What are the consequences of my pain?“It hurts and I think about it all the time. I don’t know what I can do to relieve it and am afraid I can make it worse if I walk too much or if I carry/lift heavy loads.”“When you run for a long time, your legs get tired. The same happens to your back when you carry the schoolbag for a long time. The soreness does not mean that you risk damaging anything. If anything, you are making it stronger”“Carrying the schoolbag despite being sore can result in the pain becoming chronic”
How well can I control my pain? “There are a lot of things I used to be able to do without pain, but now it hurts when I walk with my backpack. I guess the only thing I can do is to stop walking and/or carrying my bag to school?”“You can put the schoolbag down or change how you carry it when you get tired. You don’t have to carry it all day. This way, the soreness you may feel, will quickly go away when you get to school/home and can put the bag down.”“The schoolbag is too heavy for you, but you have no choice but to carry it as you need all the books for school. There is no way around it”
How long will the pain last?“I’m only 15 so I hope it doesn’t affect my plans for the future. I just don’t think the pain will go away if I have to continue doing what hurts me.”“Carrying your schoolbag will eventually make the back stronger so you will get to a point where the weight won’t bother you anymore”“You need to put up with this soreness until you no longer need to carry your schoolbag”
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palsson, T.S.; Andreucci, A.; Straszek, C.L.; Rathleff, M.S.; Hoegh, M. Reducing the Weight of Spinal Pain in Children and Adolescents. Children 2021, 8, 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121139

AMA Style

Palsson TS, Andreucci A, Straszek CL, Rathleff MS, Hoegh M. Reducing the Weight of Spinal Pain in Children and Adolescents. Children. 2021; 8(12):1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palsson, Thorvaldur S., Alessandro Andreucci, Christian Lund Straszek, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, and Morten Hoegh. 2021. "Reducing the Weight of Spinal Pain in Children and Adolescents" Children 8, no. 12: 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop