Next Article in Journal
Repurposing Antipsychotics for Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Inflammatory, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis Effects in Zebrafish Larvae after Rapid Exposure to a Commercial Glyphosate Formulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/biomedicines9121783
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generation of a Novel High-Affinity Antibody Binding to PCSK9 Catalytic Domain with Slow Dissociation Rate by CDR-Grafting, Alanine Scanning and Saturated Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Favorably Treating Hypercholesterolemia

by
Zhengli Bai
†,
Menglong Xu
†,
Ying Mei
†,
Tuo Hu
,
Panpan Zhang
,
Manman Chen
,
Wenxiu Lv
,
Chenchen Lu
and
Shuhua Tan
*
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Druggability of Biopharmaceuticals, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Department of Molecular Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(12), 1783; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121783
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Revised: 22 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 27 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Discovery and Development)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has become an attractive therapeutic strategy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this study, a novel high affinity humanized IgG1 mAb (named h5E12-L230G) targeting the catalytic domain of human PCSK9 (hPCSK9) was generated by using CDR-grafting, alanine-scanning mutagenesis, and saturated site-directed mutagenesis. The heavy-chain constant region of h5E12-L230G was modified to eliminate the cytotoxic effector functions and mitigate the heterogeneity. The biolayer interferometry (BLI) binding assay and molecular docking study revealed that h5E12-L230G binds to the catalytic domain of hPCSK9 with nanomolar affinity (KD = 1.72 nM) and an extremely slow dissociation rate (koff, 4.84 × 10−5 s−1), which interprets its quite low binding energy (−54.97 kcal/mol) with hPCSK9. Additionally, h5E12-L230G elevated the levels of LDLR and enhanced the LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells, as well as reducing the serum LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels in hyperlipidemic mouse model with high potency comparable to the positive control alirocumab. Our data indicate that h5E12-L230G is a high-affinity anti-PCSK9 antibody candidate with an extremely slow dissociation rate for favorably treating hypercholesterolemia and relevant cardiovascular diseases.

1. Introduction

Hypercholesterolemia with elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [1,2]. Accumulating experimental and clinical studies implicate that a high level of LDL-C in the serum is closely associated with the incidence of CVDs [3,4,5]. Plasma LDL-C is mainly cleared through binding to the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) on the surface of hepatocytes, and the formed LDL-C/LDL-R complex is subsequently transported to lysosome for LDL-C degradation, and the LDLR is recycled to the cell surface [6].
However, it has been revealed that proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) could mediate LDLR degradation by binding to the epidermal growth factor (A) and β-propeller domains of LDLR [7,8,9], thereby, PCSK9 has been now recognized as an attractive therapeutic target for hypercholesterolemia. Recently, several kinds of PCSK9 inhibitors, including small peptides [10], small interfering RNA (siRNAs) [11] and antibodies [12,13,14], have been developed. Of them, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that block the interaction of PCSK9/LDLR appear to be promising therapeutic agents to treat hypercholesterolemia because of their significant advantages such as being highly selective, well-tolerated and having fewer dosing frequencies [15].
The hybridoma technique, invented by Köhler and Milstein, is a well-established robust method for generating mAbs targeting the antigen of interest [16,17,18]. Yet, mAbs prepared by the hybridoma technique could induce the human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) response [19]. To circumvent this issue, multiple effective humanization strategies have been successfully developed [20]. Initially, chimeric antibodies were constructed by substituting the murine constant region with an appropriate human constant region to reduce the content of heterologous sequences [21], and several chimeric antibodies were approved by FDA, including ramucirumab, brentuximab, dinutuximab, etc. In chimeric antibodies, the variable domains that consist of framework regions (FRs) and complementarity determining regions (CDRs) remain to be completely murine [22]. Considering FRs are not necessarily required for antigen recognition, grafting only the murine CDRs to the human FRs has been demonstrated as an excellent method to further reduce the immunogenicity of chimeric antibodies [20,23]. Up to now, quite a number of CDR-grafted antibodies, such as daclizumab, trastuzumab and palivizumab, etc., have been granted marketing approval [24].
However, grafting murine CDRs onto the FRs of human antibodies often leads to a lower affinity for the target antigen and requires additional processes to restore or improve the affinity [24]. Back-mutation of some residues in human FRs to the original murine ones was commonly applied to rescue the antibody’s binding affinity. In addition, in vitro affinity maturation of mAbs, which mimics the natural affinity maturation in vivo [25], could also help to restore the affinity of humanized antibodies. The most commonly used in vitro affinity maturation technologies are (1) site-directed mutagenesis and random mutagenesis consisting in the introduction of mutagenesis specifically or randomly throughout the gene, (2) chain shuffling that recombines the heavy and light chains of different antibodies with high affinity, (3) phage display which allows screening the desired antibody from a large library with millions to trillions of variants [26,27,28].
In the present study, we aimed to generate a high-affinity hybridoma-derived mAb against hPCSK9 for future therapeutic applications. In order to reach this goal, a CDR-grafting humanization approach was initially performed to reduce the immunogenicity of selected murine mAb, some key residues in murine FRs that might influence the antigen-binding activity were back-mutated attempting to restore full affinity. Thereafter, alanine-scanning mutational analysis followed by a saturated site-directed mutagenesis process were conducted on the critical amino acid residue of humanized antibody to further improve its affinity. Finally, the selected optimized scFvs were reformatted into full-length IgG by fusing with the modified human IgG1 constant region for favorably treating hypercholesterolemia in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

MEM, DMEM, Opti-MEM, and Pluronic-F68 were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin G sodium salt, streptomycin solution, and hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (HAT) were obtained from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA). HyClone™ HyCell™ CHO Medium was bought from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Additionally, 25 kDa linear polyethyleneimine (LPEI) was obtained from Polysciences (Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA). Quickantibody-Mouse 5W adjuvant (Cat# KX0210041) was obtained from Biodragon Immunotechnologies (Beijing, China). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Biofroxx (Einhausen, Hessen, Germany). Agarose Gel DNA Extraction Kit, RNAiso Plus, and PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser were bought from TaKaRa (Dalian, Liaoning, China). Rabbit anti-LDLR antibody (Cat# ab52818) and rabbit anti-PCSK9 antibody (Cat# ab181142) were bought from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Glutamine, TMB substrate, IPTG, HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cat# D110058), rabbit anti-GAPDH antibody (Cat# D110016), and Alexa Fluor 488®-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cat# D110061) were bought from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). DiI-LDL was obtained from Yiyuan Biotechnologies (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Commercial test kits for LDL-C, TG, TC, and HDL-C were obtained from Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China).

2.2. Bacterial Strains and Cell Lines

Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains DH5α and BL21 (DE3) were used as hosts for plasmid preparation and single-chain variable fragment (scFv) prokaryotic expression, respectively. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-3E7) cells were obtained from Genscript Biotech (Nanjing, China), cultured in HyClone™ HyCell™ CHO Medium, and used as hosts for IgG1 eukaryotic transient expression. Mouse myeloma cell line SP2/0 was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and 10% (v/v) FBS. Human hepatic HepG2 cells were obtained from China Infrastructure of Cell Line Resources (Beijing, China) and maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2, in MEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL). All cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in the air.

2.3. Antigen Preparation

The recombinant plasmids expressing hPCSK9 (pTT5-hPCSK9) were constructed as previously described [29], and transiently transfected into suspension CHO-3E7 mammalian cells using PEI transfection reagent [30]. On day 7 post transfection, the supernatant was purified with a Ni2+-based immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (Ni-IMAC, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA), followed by SuperdexTM 200 HR 10/300GL size-exclusion chromatography (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Protein concentration was determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China).

2.4. Generation of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies

Female BALB/c mice (6–8-week, Qinglongshan Experimental Animal Breeding Farm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) were intramuscularly immunized with adjuvant-combined hPCSK9 protein (20 μg per mouse) on day 1 and day 21. The final boost (50 μg of hPCSK9 protein) was given intraperitoneally on day 35 without adjuvant. Three days after the final booster immunization, orbital blood of mice was collected for antibody titer detection. When the antibody titters attained 1:100,000, the cell fusion was conducted according to standard cell fusion procedures [16,31]. Afterward, the positive hybridoma cells were screened by indirect ELISA and subcloned three times by limiting dilution method. The ascites of identified hybridoma were also prepared by injection of 1 × 106 positive hybridoma cells into the peritoneal cavity of pristine-treated BALB/c mice, and the ascites containing specific mAbs were purified by protein A affinity chromatography (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The isotype of purified mAb was determined using a mouse monoclonal subtype identification kit (KMI-2, ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

2.5. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

The hybridoma cells producing antibodies against hPCSK9 were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using 96-well plates coated with hPCSK9 (1 μg/mL) in coating buffer (0.2 M Na2CO3/NaHCO3, pH 9.6) overnight at 4 °C. The plates were then blocked with PBS containing 3% (w/v) BSA for 2 h at 37 °C and incubated with 100 μL of hybridoma supernatants at 37 °C for 2 h. Additionally, non-competitive phage ELISA with the addition of increasing concentrations of mAb (10−1, 10, 102, 103, 104, 105 ng/mL) was also set up to further measure the affinity constant (Kaff) of selected mAb as described previously [32]. After washing three times with 0.1% Tween in PBS (PBST), HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody was added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Finally, the TMB substrate was added and allowed to develop for 15 min at room temperature, and the absorbance at 450 nm was detected using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.6. Western Blot Analysis

The cells or tissues lysates were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer and collected by centrifugation at 12,000× g as previously described [33]. After protein concentrations determination with BCA protein assay, equal amounts of samples were subjected to 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE and transferred to 0.22 μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (MerckMillipore, Darmstadt, Germany). After blocking with 0.1% (v/v) TBS-Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5% (w/v) nonfat milk for 2 h at room temperature, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies against LDLR (Cat# ab52818, 1:1000) or GAPDH (Cat# D110016, 1:1000) at 4 °C overnight, and then incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cat# D110058, 1:5000) at 25 °C for 1.5 h. Protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) solution (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified with the ImageJ 1.42q (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.7. LDL-C Uptake Assay

LDL-C uptake assay was conducted as previously described [34] with slight modification. In brief, HepG2 cells were seeded in black 96-well plates at a density of 3 × 104 cells per well and cultured overnight. Cells were then pretreated with opti-MEM for 12 h, and treated with 20 μg/mL hPCSK9 alone or co-treatment with 50 μg/mL antibodies for 8 h. Afterwards, 20 μg/mL DiI-LDL was added to each well and incubated for an additional 4 h. After washing 3 times with PBS in the dark, LDL-C uptake levels were measured using a Multimode Reader (Thermo scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 520 nm excitation/580 nm emission.

2.8. Cloning of VH and VL Gene from Hybridoma Cells

Total RNA was isolated from hybridoma cells secreting monoclonal antibody (mAb) against hPCSK9 by RNAiso reagent and quantified by measuring A260 nm on a Thermo NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then the first-strand cDNA was amplified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and the variable region genes of the heavy and light chains of selected mAb were respectively amplified by PCR using PrimeSTAR® HS DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, Liaoning, China) and previously published primer pairs [35] with minor modification (Table S1).

2.9. Computer Modeling of Single-Chain Variable-Fragment Antibodies

The three-dimensional (3D) structure models of single-chain variable-fragment antibodies (scFvs) were built via homology modeling using the Schrodinger Suite 2009 (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA). The Gromacs program, a versatile package in Schrodinger software to perform molecular dynamics, was used to optimize the structure of m5E12scFv in silico and make it closer to the conformation in the natural environment Subsequently, the qualities of the constructed models were evaluated by Ramachandran Plot within Discovery Studio software v2.5 (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Root mean square deviation (RMSD) is a statistic to assess the deviation degree between resulting and target conformations, which here was used to estimate the model deviation of the constructed models. Thus, the RMSD values of the main chain atoms (C-α, C, N, O) in CDRs between the models were also calculated by Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software (Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Quebec, Canada).

2.10. Design of Humanized scFvs

Two humanized scFvs were designed based on different antibody humanization methods. The first humanized scFv was designed by transferring murine CDRs onto suitable human consensus FR templates with the highest similarity using a traditional approach called CDR grafting [36]. In order to maintain murine CDRs conformation, the key residues, including (a) residues with less than 30% surface accessibility [37] (b) abnormal residues [38], (c) “Vernier” residues located at the FR-CDR junction [39], which may change CDRs conformations were screened by Abcheck (https://www.abcheckantibodies.com/ accessed on 27 October 2017) and Schrodinger Suite 2009. Afterward, another humanized scFv was then designed by back-mutation of these key residues to the amino acids of the original murine mAb.

2.11. Construction, Expression, and Purification of scFvs

The genes encoding the humanized scFvs were synthesized at Genscript Biotech and subcloned into pET-27b (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) containing the pectate lyase signal peptide (pelB) of Erwinia carotovora using primers listed in Table S2. The resulting recombinant plasmids were further transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells through CaCl2 heat shock method, and the transformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were cultured in 2 × YT medium with 50 μg/mL of kanamycin at 37 °C. When the OD600 reached 0.6–0.8, the temperature was shifted to 16 °C and 0.2 mM isopropyl-β-galactosidase (IPTG) was added to induce expression for 18 h. The expressed scFv proteins with C-terminal 6 × His-tagged were isolated from the periplasm and purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and SuperdexTM 75 HR 10/300GL size exclusion (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) successively, according to manufactures’ protocols.

2.12. Saturated Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Humanized scFv

The residues in HCDR3 and LCDR3 are most likely to dominate the antibody–antigen interaction [40]. To further identify critical residues involved in hPCSK9 binding, alanine scanning mutagenesis was carried out in these two regions by one-step PCR technology [41]. Briefly, residues in HCDR3 and LCDR3 excepting (a) Tyr and Trp which are advantageous for large van der Waals or hydrophobic interactions, (b) Asn and Ser which mainly form hydrogen bonds, (c) glutamine at the 89th and 90th position of the light chain [42], were selected to mutate to alanine. The oligonucleotide primers used were listed in Table S3. The effect of each mutated site on the activity of humanized scFv was determined by measuring the changes in LDL uptake after treating HepG2 cells with purified humanized scFv proteins. Afterward, the key residues were identified and site-directed saturation mutagenesis was conducted on these residues using the primers listed in Table S4.

2.13. Generation of Full-Length Antibodies

To generate full-length antibodies, the VH and VL of humanized scFvs were fused with the constant region of heavy chain (HC) and kappa light chain of human IgG1 (LC, Accession number: ABU90709.2) by overlap-extension PCR (OE-PCR) [43], respectively. Primers used for OE-PCR were listed in Table S5. In order to eliminate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (CDC) effects, the human IgG1 constant region was modified with L234A/L235A/N297G [44,45,46], and the C-terminal lysine residue in HC was deleted to reduce heterogeneity [47]. The amplified HC and LC coding genes (GenBank accession number: MW715631, MW715632, MW725291, MW725292, MW725293) containing a signal peptide sequence (‘MDWTWRFLFVVAAATGVQS’ for HC secretory expression, Accession number: CAA34971.1; ‘MDMRVPAQLLGLLLLWLSGARC’ for LC secretory expression, Accession number: S24320) at the 5′-end were then subcloned into a eukaryotic expression vector pTT5, respectively. The constructed recombinant plasmids (Figure S7) were co-transfected into CHO-3E7 mammalian cells at a 1:1 ratio (w:w) [30], and the culture supernatants were purified with a protein A column (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).

2.14. Binding Affinity Measurement

ForteBio Octet QKe (ForteBio, Fremont, CA, USA), a biomacromolecule interaction analysis system, was used to measure the affinity constants of antibodies. In short, hPCSK9 (50 μg/mL) was biotinylated at room temperature for 2 h using a biotinylation kit (Genemore, Shanghai, China) and immobilized on the surface of streptavidin biosensors (ForteBio) for 300 s. The antigen-captured biosensors were then dipped into series 2-fold dilution of antibodies for 300 s or longer and moved to SD buffer (PBS containing 0.02% Tween 20 and 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4) without antibodies for 600 s. The concentrations of scFvs were 6000, 3000, 1500, 750, 375, 187.5, 93.75 nM, and mAbs were 800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 nM. The kinetic constants including kon, koff, and KD were analyzed by using ForteBio data analysis software v7.1 (ForteBio, Fremont, CA, USA).

2.15. Homology Modeling and Protein Contact Identification

To explore the specific binding mechanism of the antigen-antibody, the three-dimensional (3D) structure model of the Fab fragment of h5E12-L230G was constructed by SWISS-MODEL Workspace (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/ accessed on 10 March 2021) based on the top-ranked template with known structure, and the stereochemical property was checked through the Ramachandran plot [48]. Subsequently, the generated models were further docked with a high-resolution 2.3 Å crystal structure of PCSK9 (PDB ID:5OCA) using the BioLuminate module of Schrödinger Software Suite 2009 (Schrödinger). Following this, the key interaction residues between the antibody and PCSK9 were identified using the Pymol software Version 2.3.0 (Schrödinger), and the free binding energy (△Gbinds) of the Fab-PCSK9-complex were calculated using the Molecular Mechanics/GB Surface Area (MM/GBSA) method (http://cadd.zju.edu.cn/hawkdock/ accessed on 12 March 2021) [49].

2.16. Studies in Mice

Male C57BL/6 mice aged 6–8 weeks were obtained from Qinglongshan Experimental Animal Breeding Farm (Certificate no. SCXK (Su) 2017-0001; Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) and housed in a temperature (25 °C) and humidity-controlled (50–60%) room with access to food and water ad libitum. Following 1 week of acclimation, mice were randomly split into 8 groups (a normal group, a model group, and six treatment groups, n = 6 per group). On day 1, the model group and dosing group were injected 2 mL saline containing 50 μg pTT5-hPCSK9 intravenously in 5–7 s to establish hyperlipidemic mouse model [50,51], while the normal group was just injected with 2 mL saline. On day 7, the dosing groups were administered with 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg of mAbs in 100 μL saline, respectively, while the normal and model groups were administered same-volume saline. Then the mice were fasted for 8 h and euthanized for blood sample collection. Liver tissues were also collected, and dissected into two parts, one was homogenized by RIPA buffer containing 1 mM PMSF for Western blot analysis, the other part was fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 48 h and routinely embedded in paraffin for immunofluorescence analysis. All experiments were performed under a project license (NO.: 201601179) granted by the Animal Ethics Committees of China Pharmaceutical University, in compliance with national guidelines for the care and use of animals.

2.17. Immunofluorescence Analysis

Immunofluorescence staining was performed to detect LDLR protein levels in mice livers as previously described [33] with minor modification. Briefly, after deparaffinization and hydration, liver tissue sections were pretreated by heating for 20 min in boiling sodium citrate solution (0.01 M, pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval. Afterward, the tissue sections were blocked with 10% (v/v) goat serum for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with rabbit anti-LDLR antibody (Abcam,1:100) at 4 °C overnight. After washing three times with PBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Abcam, 1:200) at 37 °C for 1 h in the dark and the stained sections were mounted with a drop of glycerin. Images were taken under a Zeiss AX10 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.18. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of multiple experiments. Comparison between groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey multiple comparison test with GraphPad Prism v5.0 software (San Diego, CA, USA). Results were considered significant when p-values < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Generation of Murine Mab against Hpcsk9 by Hybridoma Technology

To generate murine mAb against hPCSK9, the recombinant hPCSK9 protein as the antigen was expressed by transient transfection of the pTT5-hPCSK9 plasmid (Figure 1A) to CHO 3E7 cells and purified by Ni-IMAC and size-exclusion chromatography as described above. Purified hPCSK9 was then identified by 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE (Figure 1B) under reducing condition and Western blot (Figure S1) using the rabbit anti-human PCSK9 antibody (Abcam, 1:3000).
Subsequently, BALB/c mice were immunized with purified hPCSK9 protein. On day 38, the mice attaining antibody titer of 1:640,000 (Figure 1C) were sacrificed, and the splenocytes were fused with SP2/0 cells for hybridoma production. A positive hybridoma clone, named 5E12, was identified by ELISA (Figure 1D) and subcloned three times by limiting dilution. This hPCSK9-specific murine antibody (named m5E12) was then purified from mouse ascites by protein A affinity chromatography (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and identified by SDS-PAGE under reducing and nonreducing conditions (Figure S2). The purified m5E12 was analyzed by Shodex PROTEIN KW-802.5 (SHOWA DENKO K.K., Japan) showing a purity of 99% (Figure S3).

3.2. Characterization of Generated m5E12

Firstly, we determined the isotype of m5E12 using a commercial murine antibody isotyping kit (KMI-2, ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The result showed that m5E12 belonged to the subtype IgG1 and the light chain of the mAb was kappa (Figure S4). Secondly, the specificity and affinity (Kaff) of m5E12 to hPCSK9 were analyzed by Western blot and ELISA. The results revealed that hPCSK9 protein could be specifically recognized by m5E12 (Figure 2A) and the affinity constant (Kaff) of m5E12 to hPCSK9 protein was 1.04 × 109 M−1 (Figure 2B). Finally, we tested the effects of m5E12 on the levels of LDLR and LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells. As shown in Figure 2C,D, m5E12 effectively increased LDLR levels and promoted the LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells as compared to the hPCSK9-treated group.

3.3. Humanization of Murine 5E12 scFv (m5E12scFv)

For antibody humanization, the VH (Figure 3A) and VL (Figure 3B) amino acid sequences of m5E12 were determined by RT-PCR and gene sequencing. The VH and VL of m5E12 were then linked in a format of VH-(Gly4Ser)3-VL, named m5E12scFv. Afterwards, humanization of m5E12scFv was accomplished by CDR grafting without (named h5E12scFv) or with back mutation (h5E12scFv-bm) by modeling.
In detail, one of the humanized variable fragments, named h5E12scFv, was designed by grafting the CDRs of m5E12 onto the heavy chain (GenBank accession number: AMK70123.1) and light chain (GenBank accession number: APZ85158.1) of human antibodies (Figure 3A,B). Back-mutation was then performed on h5E12scFv. On the one hand, N97 at the heavy chain and E45, R63, V78 at the light chain of the two human templates were rare residues and were mutated to corresponding conserved residues. On the other hand, the three-dimensional (3D) structures of m5E12scFv (Figure 3C), h5E12scFv (Figure 3D), and h5E12scFv-bm (Figure 3E) were modeled by Schrodinger software based on crystal structure with the highest sequence identity and verified by Ramachandran plot (Figure S5), and nine key residues (E1, K38, I48, K67, A68, V72, A79, L81, and S92) and seven key residues (I4, T8, I46, H59, E85, F87, and E100) in FRs of murine VH and VL, which may change CDRs conformations, were also back-mutated (named h5E12scFv-bm).
The RMSD value for the three modeled entire structures (Figure 3C–E) was 0.724 Å. The RMSDs for five non-HCDR3 loops ranged from 0.255 Å to 0.523 Å, and the HCDR3 RMSD was 1.150 Å. Since all RMSDs were less than 1.5 Å, the three structures were considered to share the same conformation at the computer level.

3.4. Preparation and Selection of Humanized 5E12 scFv

To prepare humanized 5E12 scFv proteins for selection, the genes encoding m5E12scFv, h5E12scFv, and h5E12scFv-bm fragments were synthesized at Genscript Biotech (Nanjing, China), amplified by PCR (Figure S6) and then inserted into T7 promoter driven expression vector pET-27b between Nco I and Hind III sites (Figure S7). The construct was transformed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells as described. After induction with 0.2 mM IPTG at 16 °C for 18 h, humanized 5E12 scFv proteins (Figure S8) were purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography column.
The specificity and kinetic parameters of purified humanized 5E12 scFvs binding to hPCSK9 were further determined by Competitive ELISA and ForteBio Octet QKe System. As shown in Figure S9, both h5E12scFv and h5E12scFv-bm could competitively react with hPCSK9, but the binding ability of h5E12scFv-bm was relatively weaker than h5E12scFv. It was further observed by BLI (Table S6) that h5E12scFv exhibited the highest affinity (KD = 1.71 × 10−7 M) to hPCSK9 with slower dissociation rate (koff = 1.08 × 10−3 s−1) than that of m5E12scFv (koff = 7.44 × 10−3 s−1) and h5E12scFv-bm (koff = 1.00 × 10−2 s−1), which is related with the lifetime of the antibody-antigen complex [52,53].
Additionally, we tested the effects of humanized 5E12 scFvs on the LDLR and LDL-C uptake levels in HepG2 cells. As shown in Figure 4A,B, h5E12scFv potently elevated the levels of LDLR and enhanced the LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells as compared to the hPCSK9 group, but there is still a certain gap (Figure 4B) compared with the scFv form of Alirocumab (named Ali-scFv).

3.5. Affinity Maturation of h5E12scFv In Vitro

To further enhance the affinity and bioactivity of h5E12scFv, we firstly identified the critical residues by alanine-scanning mutagenesis of several residues including F99, H100, D102, D104, F106, D107, R227, P229, L230, T231, respectively, and 10 mutants (Figure 5A) named h5E12scFv-F99A, h5E12scFv-H100A, h5E12scFv-D102A, h5E12scFv-D104A, h5E12scFv-F106A, h5E12scFv-D107A, h5E12scFv-R227A, h5E12scFv-P229A, h5E12scFv-L230A, and h5E12scFv-T231A were purified (data not shown). The biological activity of these mutants was compared by measuring the changes of LDL uptake using HepG2 cell-based assay. The results (Figure 5B) showed that h5E12scFv-D102A and h5E12scFv-D107A exhibited scarcely any PCSK9 inhibitory effect, indicating that D102 and D107 was an essential residue for maintaining h5E12scFv’ activity and should be retained. Furthermore, h5E12scFv-L230A displayed stronger biological activity than parental antibody h5E12scFv, suggesting that the mutation of L230 to other residues might improve the hPCSK9 inhibitory effect of h5E12scFv.
Secondly, site-saturated mutagenesis experiments were carried out on the L230 residue of h5E12scFv, and the corresponding mutants (Figure S10) were purified and screened by LDL uptake assay (Figure 5C). It was shown that the LDL uptake levels were effectively enhanced by h5E12scFv-L230A, h5E12scFv-L230S, and h5E12scFv-L230G, and the LDL uptake levels in these three groups were restored to the comparable levels as in the Ali-scFv group. Thus, we chose h5E12scFv-L230A, h5E12scFv-L230S, and h5E12scFv-L230G for further construction of the full-length antibodies and in vivo functional studies.

3.6. Generation and Characterization of Full-Length Anti-PCSK9 Antibodies

The full-length format of anti-PCSK9 antibodies was constructed by connecting the VH and VL with a modified human IgG1 heavy-chain constant region and kappa light chain constant region, respectively. The heavy (GenBank accession number: MW715631) and light chain DNA sequence (GenBank accession number: MW715632, MW725291, MW725292, MW725293) of full-length antibodies were then inserted into the pTT5 vector (Figure S11) and co-transfected into CHO-3E7 cells for transient expression. After purification by protein A affinity chromatography columns, the obtained mAbs were verified by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing and reducing conditions (Figure 6A).
Subsequently, Dil-LDL uptake assay was performed as described above to test the hPCSK9 inhibitory effect of purified mAbs. The results (Figure 6B) showed that all the generated mAbs, including h5E12, h5E12-L230A, h5E12-L230S, h5E12-L230G, could significantly inhibit PCSK9-induced decrease in Dil-LDL uptake of HepG2 cells (p < 0.001). Among them, h5E12-L230G exhibited the most potent activity in enhancing the LDL-C uptake levels, which was comparable to the positive control alirocumab.
We further detect and compare the affinity constant of h5E12-L230G and alirocumab to hPCSK9 using the BLI method. As shown in Figure 6C,D and Table S7, h5E12-L230G displayed a moderately slower association rate (kon= 2.81 × 104 M−1s−1) and a slightly slower dissociation rate (koff = 4.84 × 10−5 s−1) than alirocumab (kon= 8.04 × 104 M−1s−1, koff = 6.87 × 10−5 s−1), thus yielding a ~2-fold lower affinity (KD = 1.72 × 10−9 M vs. 8.54 × 10−10 M) as compared to alirocumab. It can be concluded that the slower dissociation rate (koff) between h5E12-L230G and hPCSK9 results in a longer binding period, which may enhance the hPCSK9 inhibitory of h5E12-L230G to the comparable level of Alirocumab.
In addition, to further elucidate the interaction details at the paratope–epitope interface, the 3D structure of Fab region of h5E12-L230G (Figure S12A) was built based on the top-ranked template crystal structure (PDB ID:6DW2). Ramachandran plot (Figure S12B) of the modeled h5E12-L230G revealed that 97.91% of the residues were in the most favorable and allowed regions, indicating that the modeled structure was appropriate for the molecular docking analysis. The following docking results (Figure 6E) suggested that h5E12-L230G binds to the catalytic domain of hPCSK9, and both the heavy-chain and light-chain variable domain contributed to protein–ligand interaction. It appeared that as many as fourteen residues (S25, T28, W33, N55, H100, D102, Y103, D107, Y108 in heavy chain and Y49, S50, Y53, R54, S56 in light chain) in h5E12-L230G and up to fourteen residues (A168, L179, E181, E197, G198, R199, V200, V202, R237, D238, K243, S246, P279, S401 in catalytic domain) in hPCSK9 involved in the interactions, forming fifteen hydrogen bonds and two ionic bonds in the binding pocket (Table S8). Finally, the binding free energy (ΔGbind) of the illustrated docking mode calculated using the MM-GBSA method was as low as −54.97 kcal/mol, indicating the h5E12-L230G showed high binding strength with hPCSK9.

3.7. Hypolipidemic Effect of h5E12-L230G in Mice Over-Expressing hPCSK9

We next evaluated the lipid-lowering efficacy of h5E12-L230G in vivo. The mice over-expressing hPCSK9 was established through HDD of 50 μg naked plasmid pTT5-hPCSK9. On day 6 after HDD, the mice in the treatment groups were given once by tail vein injection of h5E12-L230G. The results of Western blot (Figure 7A) and immunofluorescence (Figure 7C) revealed that h5E12-L230G dose-dependently up-regulated the LDLR levels in liver tissues 18 h after administration. Additionally, it was shown that treatment with h5E12-L230G at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg resulted in a 5.8% (p > 0.05), 30.1% (p < 0.01), and 36.2% (p < 0.001) reduction in serum LDL-C relative to the model group, respectively (Figure 7B and Table 1), and h5E12-L230G treatment could also significantly lowered the levels of serum total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG), but did not significantly affect serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) levels (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Elevated plasma LDL-C in patients with hypercholesterolemia is a well-established risk factor for CVDs. For over three decades, numerous clinical trials have firmly demonstrated the validity of LDL-C reduction in the prevention of CVD developing [4,54] and LDL-C levels have been accepted as a reliable efficacy endpoint for curative assessment and drug approval [55]. Nowadays, reduction of plasma LDL-C levels with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) remains the cornerstone of lipid management for the reduction of cardiovascular (CV) events in both primary and secondary prevention [56]. However, a significant percentage of patients cannot tolerate statin therapy due to the side-effect or cannot reach their recommended LDL-C goals even with a high enough statin dose [57,58]. Thus, it is necessary to develop novel LDL-C lowering drugs for these special patient populations.
PCSK9, a secreted protein able to induce the degradation of LDLR thereby reduce the clearance of LDL particles, has emerged as a promising target to reduce circulating LDL-C levels [15,59]. Nowadays, mAbs remain one of the most promising molecular targeted drugs because of their high specificity, and long half-life, and administration of PCSK9-targeting mAbs is an effective therapeutic way to suppress the interaction between PCSK9 and LDLR [60,61]. More recently, several mAbs targeting PCSK9, such as evolocumab, alirocumab [62], and LY3015014 [63], have been approved for clinical use or under clinic trials. In the present study, we chose alirocumab as the positive control and expected to generate a potent anti-hPCSK9 mAb with good druggability utilizing hybridoma-based methods.
Using the hybridoma technique, we initially generated a murine mAb targeting hPCSK9 (named m5E12), which could restore PCSK9-induced LDLR degradation and inhibit LDL uptake in HepG2 cells (Figure 2C,D). What needs illustration is that the humanization and affinity maturation of m5E12 here were performed using the scFv format instead of using the full-length antibody format—this is because scFv proteins can be easily obtained from E. coli expression system, which has the advantage of being fast-growing, inexpensive and easy to manipulate [64].
Specifically, to reduce the immunogenicity of mouse antibody, m5E12 was humanized by means of CDR grafting and back-mutation methods [36,37,38,39], generating two humanized m5E12 (h5E12scFv and h5E12scFv-bm) in the respective scFv format. Intriguingly, although the RMSD analysis showed that the humanized scFvs converged to the same conformation (Figure 3C–E), their affinity (KD) and biological activity were different. It was revealed that h5E12scFv displayed a higher affinity (KD) and hPCSK9 inhibitory effect than h5E12scFv-bm (Figure S9 and Figure 4A,B). It has been reported that framework back-mutations help to maintain the native murine paratope conformation (57). However, in this report, the replacement of 16 key residues (Figure 3A,B) into those in the parent murine antibody failed to improve the affinity of CDR-grafted antibody (Table S6). Moreover, it should be pointed out that the back-mutation processes also increase the non-human content which could increase the potential risk of immunogenicity in humans, revealing that the framework back-mutation might not always be needed in the development of murine-derived therapeutic antibodies.
To further improve the antibody’s affinity and bioactivity, alanine scanning mutagenesis was firstly conducted on the HCDR3 and LCDR3 of h5E12scFv to identify critical residues involved in antigen binding. Ten residues in HCDR3 and LCDR3 were selected to mutate to alanine, and we found that the L230A variant, termed h5E12scFv-L230A, was able to restore LDL uptake to the level slightly higher than that of parental antibody h5E12scFv (Figure 5B). Therefore, we assumed that the alteration of L230 residues in h5E12scFv might help to improve its activity, and fortunately, the following site-saturated mutagenesis experiment proved this hypothesis (Figure 5C). These results suggested that alanine-scanning mutational analysis along with a saturated site-directed mutagenesis process is a high-efficiency and powerful combined strategy to improve antibody activity, and mutagenesis of only one residue in LCDR3, in some cases, could obviously affect the property of an antibody.
To date, the majority of therapeutic antibodies developed are full-length IgG, and the full-length IgG molecules are considered one of the most suitable formats for clinical applications because of their increased stability, acquired multivalent binding, and extended half-life [65]. In addition, it is worth noting that therapeutic mAbs with cytotoxic effector function are not desirable for non-oncologic therapeutic applications. Therefore, the selected optimized scFv mutants (h5E12scFv-L230A, h5E12scFv-L230G, h5E12scFv-L230S) here were reformatted into full-length Fc-silenced IgG1 format which would not trigger ADCC and CDC effects [45,46]. Of these full-length antibodies, h5E12-L230G could reverse LDL uptake to the comparable levels of alirocumab (Figure 6B) and bind to hPCSK9 with a 1.41-fold slower dissociation rate (koff = 4.84 × 10−5 s−1) than alirocumab (koff = 6.87 × 10−5 s−1). It is notable that a targeted therapeutic drug with a slow dissociation rate appears to be effective since slow dissociation rate contributes to the long-lasting target binding of drugs [52]. Thus, the extremely slow dissociation rate of h5E12-L230G to hPCSK9 might partly account for its potent hPCSK9 inhibitory effect in vitro and in vivo.
It has been shown that both the catalytic domain and C-terminal domain targeting antibodies have inhibitory effects on the function of PCSK9 [66,67]. We have also previously developed a human mAb targeting the C-terminal domain (CTD) of PCSK9 utilizing phage display-based strategy [29]. Molecular modeling and docking techniques are widely used to predict the binding mode of a drug with its protein target [68,69].
In this work, the docking results (Figure 6E and Table S8) showed that h5E12-L230G binds to the catalytic domain of hPCSK9. Up to fourteen amino acid residues in h5E12-L230G form the paratope that interacts with fourteen amino acid residues in hPCSK9′s epitope, creating as many as fifteen hydrogen bonds and two ionic bonds on the interaction site. These multiple interactions between the CDRs of h5E12-L230G and the catalytic domain of hPCSK9 resulted in a tight binding of h5E12-L230G to hPCSK9, highlighting the potential of h5E12-L230G as an alternative drug for hypercholesterolemia treatment.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, h5E12-L230G is a humanized high-affinity anti-hPCSK9 antibody that binds to the catalytic domain of hPCSK9 with an extremely slow dissociation rate and potently inhibits PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation, thereby greatly promoting LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells and decreasing the serum LDL-C and TC levels in C57BL/6 mice. The data demonstrate that h5E12-L230G has the potential to serve as a therapeutic antibody targeting PCSK9 for treating hypercholesterolemia and relevant cardiovascular diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines9121783/s1, Figure S1: Purified hPCSK9 was identified by Western blot using the rabbit anti-human PCSK9 antibody (Cat# ab181142, 1:3000). Figure S2: 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified m5E12. Figure S3: purity analysis of m5E12, Figure S4: IgG isotype identification of m5E12. Figure S5: Ramachandran plots for modelled scFvs. Figure S6: PCR-amplified DNA fragments of scFvs. Figure S7: Schematic representation of plasmids expressing anti-hPCSK9 scFv. Figure S8: SDS-PAGE analysis of purified scFvs. Figure S9: Competitive ELISA for determining binding specificity of scFvs in comparison with parental antibody m5E12. Figure S10: amino acid alignment of h5E12scFv variants. Figure S11: plasmid maps. Figure S12: homology modeling and validation of the antibody Fab fragment of h5E12-L230G. Table S1: PCR primers for amplification of VH and VL genes. Table S2: PCR primers for amplification of humanized scFvs. Table S3: PCR primers for scanning mutagenesis of h5E12scFv. Table S4: PCR primers for saturated mutagenesis variants of h5E12scFv. Table S5: PCR primers for amplification of full-length antibodies. Table S6: kinetic parameters of murine and humanized scFvs binding to hPCSK9. Table S7: Kinetic parameters of h5E12-L230G and Alirocumab binding to hPCSK9. Table S8: protein-protein contacts between h5E12-L230G and PCSK9.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.B. and S.T.; Data curation, Z.B., Y.M. and T.H.; Funding acquisition, S.T.; Investigation, Y.M., T.H., P.Z., M.C., W.L. and C.L.; Methodology, Z.B. and M.X.; Project administration, S.T.; Resources, S.T.; Software, Y.M. and T.H.; Supervision, S.T.; Validation, Z.B., Y.M. and T.H.; Visualization, M.X. and T.H.; Writing—original draft, Z.B. and Y.M.; Writing—review & editing, Z.B., M.X., Y.M. and T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by National Fund for Major Projects of China (2009ZX09103-653; 2013ZX09301303-006; 2018ZX09301035), The Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), National Fund for Fostering Talents of Basic Science (NFFTBS, 3050040016), China Pharmaceutical University “Double First-Class” project (CPU2018GY15).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in compliance with national guidelines for the care and use of animals, and approved by the Animal Ethics Committees of China Pharmaceutical University (project license NO.: 201601179, approved 17 November 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank all those who participated in the studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tietge, U.J. Hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular disease: Inflammation, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2014, 25, 94–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rader, D.J.; Daugherty, A. Translating molecular discoveries into new therapies for atherosclerosis. Nature 2008, 451, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mihaylova, B.; Emberson, J.; Blackwell, L.; Keech, A.; Simes, J.; Barnes, E.; Voysey, M.; Gray, A.; Collins, R.; Baigent, C. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: Meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012, 380, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Silverman, M.G.; Ference, B.A.; Im, K.; Wiviott, S.D.; Giugliano, R.P.; Grundy, S.M.; Braunwald, E.; Sabatine, M.S. Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2016, 316, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Egom, E.E.; Pharithi, R.B.; Hesse, S.; Starr, N.; Armstrong, R.; Sulaiman, H.M.; Gazdikova, K.; Mozos, I.; Caprnda, M.; Kubatka, P.; et al. Latest Updates on Lipid Management. High Blood Press Cardiovasc. Prev. 2019, 26, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brown, M.S.; Goldstein, J.L. A Receptor-Mediated Pathway for Cholesterol Homeostasis. Science 1986, 232, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Nassoury, N.; Blasiole, D.A.; Tebon Oler, A.; Benjannet, S.; Hamelin, J.; Poupon, V.; McPherson, P.S.; Attie, A.D.; Prat, A.; Seidah, N.G. The cellular trafficking of the secretory proprotein convertase PCSK9 and its dependence on the LDLR. Traffic 2007, 8, 718–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cunningham, D.; Danley, D.E.; Geoghegan, K.F.; Griffor, M.C.; Hawkins, J.L.; Subashi, T.A.; Varghese, A.H.; Ammirati, M.J.; Culp, J.S.; Hoth, L.R.; et al. Structural and biophysical studies of PCSK9 and its mutants linked to familial hypercholesterolemia. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Poirier, S.; Mayer, G.; Poupon, V.; McPherson, P.S.; Desjardins, R.; Ly, K.; Asselin, M.C.; Day, R.; Duclos, F.J.; Witmer, M.; et al. Dissection of the endogenous cellular pathways of PCSK9-induced low density lipoprotein receptor degradation: Evidence for an intracellular route. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 28856–28864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Mitchell, T.; Chao, G.; Sitkoff, D.; Lo, F.; Monshizadegan, H.; Meyers, D.; Low, S.; Russo, K.; DiBella, R.; Denhez, F.; et al. Pharmacologic Profile of the Adnectin BMS-962476, a Small Protein Biologic Alternative to PCSK9 Antibodies for Low-Density Lipoprotein Lowering. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 350, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Lindholm, M.W.; Elmen, J.; Fisker, N.; Hansen, H.F.; Persson, R.; Moller, M.R.; Rosenbohm, C.; Orum, H.; Straarup, E.M.; Koch, T. PCSK9 LNA antisense oligonucleotides induce sustained reduction of LDL cholesterol in nonhuman primates. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Schwartz, G.G.; Bessac, L.; Berdan, L.G.; Bhatt, D.L.; Bittner, V.; Diaz, R.; Goodman, S.G.; Hanotin, C.; Harrington, R.A.; Jukema, J.W.; et al. Effect of alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, on long-term cardiovascular outcomes following acute coronary syndromes: Rationale and design of the ODYSSEY Outcomes trial. Am. Heart J. 2014, 168, 682–689.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stroes, E.; Colquhoun, D.; Sullivan, D.; Civeira, F.; Rosenson, R.S.; Watts, G.F.; Bruckert, E.; Cho, L.; Dent, R.; Knusel, B.; et al. Anti-PCSK9 antibody effectively lowers cholesterol in patients with statin intolerance: The GAUSS-2 randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial of evolocumab. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 2541–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yokote, K.; Kanada, S.; Matsuoka, O.; Sekino, H.; Imai, K.; Tabira, J.; Matsuoka, N.; Chaudhuri, S.; Teramoto, T. Efficacy and Safety of Bococizumab (RN316/PF-04950615), a Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9, in Hypercholesterolemic Japanese Subjects Receiving a Stable Dose of Atorvastatin or Treatment-Naive- Results From a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study. Circ. J. 2017, 81, 1496–1505. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bergeron, N.; Phan, B.A.; Ding, Y.; Fong, A.; Krauss, R.M. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition: A new therapeutic mechanism for reducing cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 2015, 132, 1648–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. KÖHler, G.; Milstein, C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975, 256, 495–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, K.; Wang, B.; Qi, Q. Development of a new EGFR antibody antagonist which exhibits potential biological effects against laryngeal cancer. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cohan, S.L.; Lucassen, E.B.; Romba, M.C.; Linch, S.N. Daclizumab: Mechanisms of Action, Therapeutic Efficacy, Adverse Events and Its Uncovering the Potential Role of Innate Immune System Recruitment as a Treatment Strategy for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chan, K.T.; Cheng, S.C.; Xie, H.; Xie, Y. A humanized monoclonal antibody constructed from intronless expression vectors targets human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 284, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Safdari, Y.; Farajnia, S.; Asgharzadeh, M.; Khalili, M. Antibody humanization methods—a review and update. Biotechnology Genet. Eng. Rev. 2013, 29, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Morrison, S.L.; Johnson, M.J.; Herzenberg, L.A.; Oi, V.T. Chimeric human antibody molecules: Mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 6851–6855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chiu, M.L.; Gilliland, G.L. Engineering antibody therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016, 38, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Haidar, J.N.; Yuan, Q.A.; Zeng, L.; Snavely, M.; Luna, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, W.; Ludwig, D.L.; Zhu, Z. A universal combinatorial design of antibody framework to graft distinct CDR sequences: A bioinformatics approach. Proteins 2012, 80, 896–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. McCafferty, J.; Glover, D.R. Engineering therapeutic proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ersching, J.; Efeyan, A.; Mesin, L.; Jacobsen, J.T.; Pasqual, G.; Grabiner, B.C.; Dominguez-Sola, D.; Sabatini, D.M.; Victora, G.D. Germinal Center Selection and Affinity Maturation Require Dynamic Regulation of mTORC1 Kinase. Immunity 2017, 46, 1045–1058.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sheedy, C.; MacKenzie, C.R.; Hall, J.C. Isolation and affinity maturation of hapten-specific antibodies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Levin, A.M.; Weiss, G.A. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. Mol Biosyst 2006, 2, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Yun, S.; Lee, S.; Park, J.P.; Choo, J.; Lee, E.K. Modification of phage display technique for improved screening of high-affinity binding peptides. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 289, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xu, M.; Lei, G.; Chen, M.; Wang, K.; Lv, W.; Zhang, P.; Hu, T.; Gao, J.; Lu, C.; Mei, Y.; et al. Development of a novel, fully human, anti-PCSK9 antibody with potent hypolipidemic activity by utilizing phage display-based strategy. EBioMedicine 2021, 65, 103250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stuible, M.; Burlacu, A.; Perret, S.; Brochu, D.; Paul-Roc, B.; Baardsnes, J.; Loignon, M.; Grazzini, E.; Durocher, Y. Optimization of a high-cell-density polyethylenimine transfection method for rapid protein production in CHO-EBNA1 cells. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 281, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, H.-Y.; Stojadinovic, A.; Izadjoo, M.J. Immunization, Hybridoma Generation, and Selection for Monoclonal Antibody Production. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1131, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Beatty, J.D.; Beatty, B.G.; Vlahos, W.G. Measurement of monoclonal antibody affinity by non-competitive enzyme immunoassay. J. Immunol. Methods 1987, 100, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gu, L.; Ye, P.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Tian, Q.; Lei, G.; Zhao, C.; Gao, Z.; Zhao, W.; et al. Lunasin attenuates oxidant-induced endothelial injury and inhibits atherosclerotic plaque progression in ApoE(-/-) mice by up-regulating heme oxygenase-1 via PI3K/Akt/Nrf2/ARE pathway. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 4836–4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ly, K.; Saavedra, Y.G.; Canuel, M.; Routhier, S.; Desjardins, R.; Hamelin, J.; Mayne, J.; Lazure, C.; Seidah, N.G.; Day, R. Annexin A2 reduces PCSK9 protein levels via a translational mechanism and interacts with the M1 and M2 domains of PCSK9. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17732–17746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, Z.; Raifu, M.; Howard, M.; Smith, L.; Hansen, D.; Goldsby, R.; Ratner, D. Universal PCR amplification of mouse immunoglobulin gene variable regions: The design of degenerate primers and an assessment of the effect of DNA polymerase 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity. J. Immunol. Methods 2000, 233, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Verhoeyen, M.; Milstein, C.; Winter, G. Reshaping human antibodies: Grafting an antilysozyme activity. Science 1988, 239, 1534–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pedersen, J.T.; Henry, A.H.; Searle, S.J.; Guild, B.C.; Roguska, M.; Rees, A.R. Comparison of Surface Accessible Residues in Human and Murine Immunoglobulin Fv Domains. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 959–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Foote, J.; Winter, G. Antibody framework residues affecting the conformation of the hypervariable loops. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 224, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Haard, H.; Kazemier, B.; Arie, V.D.B.; Oudshoorn, P.; Boender, P.; Arends, J.W.; Van Gemen, B.J.I. Vernier zone residue 4 of mouse subgroup II kappa light chains is a critical determinant for antigen recognition. Immunotechnology 1999, 4, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sundberg, E.J.; Mariuzza, R.A. Molecular recognition in antibody-antigen complexes. Adv. Protein Chem. 2002, 61, 119–160. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zheng, L. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Akiba, H.; Tsumoto, K. Thermodynamics of antibody-antigen interaction revealed by mutation analysis of antibody variable regions. J. Biochem 2015, 158, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lu, Y.; Xiao, S.; Yuan, M.; Gao, Y.; Sun, J.; Xue, C. Using overlap-extension PCR technique to fusing genes for constructing recombinant plasmids. J. Basic Microbiol. 2018, 58, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hessell, A.J.; Hangartner, L.; Hunter, M.; Havenith, C.E.; Beurskens, F.J.; Bakker, J.M.; Lanigan, C.M.; Landucci, G.; Forthal, D.N.; Parren, P.W.; et al. Fc receptor but not complement binding is important in antibody protection against HIV. Nature 2007, 449, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jefferis, R. Recombinant antibody therapeutics: The impact of glycosylation on mechanisms of action. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jacobsen, F.W.; Stevenson, R.; Li, C.; Salimi-Moosavi, H.; Liu, L.; Wen, J.; Luo, Q.; Daris, K.; Buck, L.; Miller, S.; et al. Engineering an IgG Scaffold Lacking Effector Function with Optimized Developability. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 1865–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Dick, L.W.; Jr Qiu, D.; Mahon, D.; Adamo, M.; Cheng, K.C. C-terminal lysine variants in fully human monoclonal antibodies: Investigation of test methods and possible causes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L.; et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Weng, G.; Wang, E.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhu, F.; Li, D.; Hou, T. HawkDock: A web server to predict and analyze the protein-protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W322–W330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Miao, C.H.; Thompson, A.R.; Loeb, K.; Ye, X. Long-term and therapeutic-level hepatic gene expression of human factor IX after naked plasmid transfer in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2001, 3, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Suda, T.; Liu, D. Hydrodynamic gene delivery: Its principles and applications. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 2063–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Vauquelin, G.; Charlton, S.J. Long-lasting target binding and rebinding as mechanisms to prolong in vivo drug action. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 161, 488–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Copeland, R.A. The dynamics of drug-target interactions: Drug-target residence time and its impact on efficacy and safety. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2010, 5, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration; Baigent, C.; Blackwell, L.; Emberson, J.; Holland, L.E.; Reith, C.; Bhala, N.; Peto, R.; Barnes, E.H.; Keech, A.; et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010, 376, 1670–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Tardif, J.C.; Heinonen, T.; Orloff, D.; Libby, P. Vascular biomarkers and surrogates in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2006, 113, 2936–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Miller, M. ACC/AHA lipids & ASCVD guidelines: 2018 update. Metabolism 2019, 99, 116–118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Mampuya, W.M.; Frid, D.; Rocco, M.; Huang, J.; Brennan, D.M.; Hazen, S.L.; Cho, L. Treatment strategies in patients with statin intolerance: The Cleveland Clinic experience. Am. Heart J. 2013, 166, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Mancini, G.J.; Baker, S.; Bergeron, J.; Fitchett, D.; Frohlich, J.; Genest, J.; Gupta, M.; Hegele, R.A.; Ng, D.; Pearson, G.; et al. Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Statin Adverse Effects and Intolerance: Canadian Consensus Working Group Update. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016, 32, S35–S65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Horton, J.D.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. PCSK9: A convertase that coordinates LDL catabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S172–S177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. He, N.Y.; Li, Q.; Wu, C.Y.; Ren, Z.; Gao, Y.; Pan, L.H.; Wang, M.M.; Wen, H.Y.; Jiang, Z.S.; Tang, Z.H.; et al. Lowering serum lipids via PCSK9-targeting drugs: Current advances and future perspectives. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017, 38, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Rashid, H.; Meredith, I.T.; Nasis, A. PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies in 2016: Current Status and Future Challenges. Heart Lung Circ. 2017, 26, 786–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lu, R.M.; Hwang, Y.C.; Liu, I.J.; Lee, C.C.; Tsai, H.Z.; Li, H.J.; Wu, H.C. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kastelein, J.J.; Nissen, S.E.; Rader, D.J.; Hovingh, G.K.; Wang, M.-D.; Shen, T.; Krueger, K.A. Safety and efficacy of LY3015014, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9): A randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 1360–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Ahmad, Z.A.; Yeap, S.K.; Ali, A.M.; Ho, W.Y.; Alitheen, N.B.; Hamid, M. scFv antibody: Principles and clinical application. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 980250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, C.; Gao, X.; Gong, R. Engineering of Fc Fragments with Optimized Physicochemical Properties Implying Improvement of Clinical Potentials for Fc-Based Therapeutics. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chan, J.C.Y.; Piper, D.E.; Cao, Q.; Liu, D.; King, C.; Wang, W.; Tang, J.; Liu, Q.; Higbee, J.; Xia, Z.; et al. A proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 neutralizing antibody reduces serum cholesterol in mice and nonhuman primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 9820–9825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ni, Y.G.; Condra, J.H.; Orsatti, L.; Shen, X.; Di Marco, S.; Pandit, S.; Bottomley, M.J.; Ruggeri, L.; Cummings, R.T.; Cubbon, R.M.; et al. A proprotein convertase subtilisin-like/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) C-terminal domain antibody antigen-binding fragment inhibits PCSK9 internalization and restores low density lipoprotein uptake. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 12882–12891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Kosztyu, P.; Kuchar, M.; Cerny, J.; Barkocziova, L.; Maly, M.; Petrokova, H.; Czernekova, L.; Liskova, V.; Raskova Kafkova, L.; Knotigova, P.; et al. Proteins mimicking epitope of HIV-1 virus neutralizing antibody induce virus-neutralizing sera in mice. EBioMedicine 2019, 47, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Marques, S.M.; Supolikova, L.; Molcanova, L.; Smejkal, K.; Bednar, D.; Slaninova, I. Screening of Natural Compounds as P-Glycoprotein Inhibitors against Multidrug Resistance. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 09 01783 g001 550
Figure 1. Generation of murine mAb against hPCSK9 protein. (A) Schematic representation of plasmid expressing hPCSK9. Kozak, Kozak consensus sequence; hPCSK9, the full-length sequence of human PCSK9 (GenBank accession number: NM_174936.3). (B) 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified hPCSK9. M, molecular weight marker; Lane 1, purified hPCSK9 protein. There was a major band of 62 kDa corresponding to the catalytic and C-terminal domains of hPCSK9. (C) Serum titration after immunization with hPCSK9. The immune serum (antiserum) from mice immunized with hPCSK9 was titrated in dilutions from 1:200 to 1:640,000 and tested for antigen specificity by ELISA. Native mouse serum (pre-immune serum) was used as a negative control. (D) Screening of positive hybridoma clone secreting mAbs against hPCSK9 by ELISA. Cell culture medium was used as the negative control (NC).
Figure 1. Generation of murine mAb against hPCSK9 protein. (A) Schematic representation of plasmid expressing hPCSK9. Kozak, Kozak consensus sequence; hPCSK9, the full-length sequence of human PCSK9 (GenBank accession number: NM_174936.3). (B) 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified hPCSK9. M, molecular weight marker; Lane 1, purified hPCSK9 protein. There was a major band of 62 kDa corresponding to the catalytic and C-terminal domains of hPCSK9. (C) Serum titration after immunization with hPCSK9. The immune serum (antiserum) from mice immunized with hPCSK9 was titrated in dilutions from 1:200 to 1:640,000 and tested for antigen specificity by ELISA. Native mouse serum (pre-immune serum) was used as a negative control. (D) Screening of positive hybridoma clone secreting mAbs against hPCSK9 by ELISA. Cell culture medium was used as the negative control (NC).
Biomedicines 09 01783 g001
Biomedicines 09 01783 g002 550
Figure 2. Characterization of mAb 5E12. (A) Western blot analysis revealed that the hPCSK9 protein (lane 1) is specifically recognized by mAb 5E12. The solvent vehicle of hPCSK9 protein (PBS buffer) was served as a negative control (lane 2). (B) Nonparametric test fitting curve of the results of non-competitive ELISA. The EC50 was equal to 81.36 ng/mL and 90.42 ng/mL when the concentrations of hPCSK9 protein were 1 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL, respectively, by which Kaff could be calculated as 1.04 × 109 M−1, using the formula of Kaff = (n − 1)/2(n[Ab’]t − [Ab]t). (C) Inhibitory effect of m5E12 on PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation as assessed by Western blot analysis. HepG2 cells were treated with 20 μg/mL hPCSK9 alone or co-treated with 50 μg/mL m5E12 for 12 h, then the protein levels of LDLR were determined by Western blot. The changes of LDLR were calculated relative to that of the Mock group (vehicle control) after calibration with GAPDH in each lane. (D) Effect of m5E12 on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells. ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 vs. Mock group; *** p < 0.001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Figure 2. Characterization of mAb 5E12. (A) Western blot analysis revealed that the hPCSK9 protein (lane 1) is specifically recognized by mAb 5E12. The solvent vehicle of hPCSK9 protein (PBS buffer) was served as a negative control (lane 2). (B) Nonparametric test fitting curve of the results of non-competitive ELISA. The EC50 was equal to 81.36 ng/mL and 90.42 ng/mL when the concentrations of hPCSK9 protein were 1 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL, respectively, by which Kaff could be calculated as 1.04 × 109 M−1, using the formula of Kaff = (n − 1)/2(n[Ab’]t − [Ab]t). (C) Inhibitory effect of m5E12 on PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation as assessed by Western blot analysis. HepG2 cells were treated with 20 μg/mL hPCSK9 alone or co-treated with 50 μg/mL m5E12 for 12 h, then the protein levels of LDLR were determined by Western blot. The changes of LDLR were calculated relative to that of the Mock group (vehicle control) after calibration with GAPDH in each lane. (D) Effect of m5E12 on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells. ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 vs. Mock group; *** p < 0.001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Biomedicines 09 01783 g002
Biomedicines 09 01783 g003 550
Figure 3. Humanization of m5E12scFv. (A,B) Sequence alignment of the VH (A) and VL (B) domain of m5E12scFv, h5E12scFv, and h5E12scFv-bm. The canonical residues back-mutated to murine residues in FRs of h5E12scFv-bm are marked in green, and the residues different between murine and humanized scFvs are marked in red. The CDRs are marked in yellow. (C) The homology modelled structures of m5E12scFv. The murine heavy chain (PDB ID: 10AR_H) and murine light chain (PDB ID: 1H8N_A) were used as templates for modelling of m5E12scFv. (D) The homology modelled structures of h5E12scFv. the homo heavy chain (PDB ID: 3HC0_H) and homo light chain (PDB ID: 1T04_A) were used as templates for modelling h5E12scFv. (E) The homology modelled structures of h5E12scFv-bm. The humanized heavy chain (PDB ID: 1IT9_H) and homo light chain (PDB ID: 1AD9_L) were used as templates for modelling h5E12scFv-bm. The FRs of heavy chains and light chains are presented in blue and green, respectively; the CDRs of variable regions are presented in purple; the residues in h5E12scFv different from m5E12scFv are presented in the skeletal formula; the back-mutated residues in h5E12scFv-bm are presented in the ball-and-stick formula.
Figure 3. Humanization of m5E12scFv. (A,B) Sequence alignment of the VH (A) and VL (B) domain of m5E12scFv, h5E12scFv, and h5E12scFv-bm. The canonical residues back-mutated to murine residues in FRs of h5E12scFv-bm are marked in green, and the residues different between murine and humanized scFvs are marked in red. The CDRs are marked in yellow. (C) The homology modelled structures of m5E12scFv. The murine heavy chain (PDB ID: 10AR_H) and murine light chain (PDB ID: 1H8N_A) were used as templates for modelling of m5E12scFv. (D) The homology modelled structures of h5E12scFv. the homo heavy chain (PDB ID: 3HC0_H) and homo light chain (PDB ID: 1T04_A) were used as templates for modelling h5E12scFv. (E) The homology modelled structures of h5E12scFv-bm. The humanized heavy chain (PDB ID: 1IT9_H) and homo light chain (PDB ID: 1AD9_L) were used as templates for modelling h5E12scFv-bm. The FRs of heavy chains and light chains are presented in blue and green, respectively; the CDRs of variable regions are presented in purple; the residues in h5E12scFv different from m5E12scFv are presented in the skeletal formula; the back-mutated residues in h5E12scFv-bm are presented in the ball-and-stick formula.
Biomedicines 09 01783 g003
Biomedicines 09 01783 g004 550
Figure 4. Selection of humanized 5E12 scFv. (A) Inhibitory effect of humanized 5E12scFv on PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation as assessed by Western blot analysis. HepG2 cells were treated with 20 μg/mL PCSK9 alone or co-treated with 50 μg/mL m5E12 for 12 h, then the protein levels of LDLR were determined by Western blot. The changes of LDLR were calculated relative to that of the Mock group (vehicle control) after calibration with GAPDH in each lane. (B) Effect of humanized 5E12 scFv on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells. #### p < 0.0001 vs. Mock group; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Figure 4. Selection of humanized 5E12 scFv. (A) Inhibitory effect of humanized 5E12scFv on PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation as assessed by Western blot analysis. HepG2 cells were treated with 20 μg/mL PCSK9 alone or co-treated with 50 μg/mL m5E12 for 12 h, then the protein levels of LDLR were determined by Western blot. The changes of LDLR were calculated relative to that of the Mock group (vehicle control) after calibration with GAPDH in each lane. (B) Effect of humanized 5E12 scFv on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells. #### p < 0.0001 vs. Mock group; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Biomedicines 09 01783 g004
Biomedicines 09 01783 g005 550
Figure 5. Affinity maturation and selection of h5E12scFv in vitro. (A) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of h5E12scFv with its corresponding alanine-scanning variants. Dashes (-) represent the same residue as h5E12scFv. (B) Effect of the alanine-scanning mutants of h5E12scFv on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2. The result revealed that L230 was not necessary for maintaining h5E12scFv’s activity and its modification might improve the hPCSK9 inhibitory effect of h5E12scFv. (C) Effect of the saturated mutagenesis variants of h5E12scFv on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2. The result showed that h5E12scFv-L230S was the most potent hPCSK9 inhibitor among all the h5E12scFv variants. #### p < 0.0001 vs. Mock group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Figure 5. Affinity maturation and selection of h5E12scFv in vitro. (A) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of h5E12scFv with its corresponding alanine-scanning variants. Dashes (-) represent the same residue as h5E12scFv. (B) Effect of the alanine-scanning mutants of h5E12scFv on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2. The result revealed that L230 was not necessary for maintaining h5E12scFv’s activity and its modification might improve the hPCSK9 inhibitory effect of h5E12scFv. (C) Effect of the saturated mutagenesis variants of h5E12scFv on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2. The result showed that h5E12scFv-L230S was the most potent hPCSK9 inhibitor among all the h5E12scFv variants. #### p < 0.0001 vs. Mock group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.
Biomedicines 09 01783 g005
Biomedicines 09 01783 g006 550
Figure 6. Preparation and identification of the full-length anti-PCSK9 antibodies. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified anti-PCSK9 mAbs under non-reducing (left panel, 10% gel) and reducing (right panel, 12% gel) conditions. M, molecular weight marker; Lane 1, Alirocumab; Lane 2, h5E12; Lane 3, h5E12-L230A; Lane 4, h5E12-L230S; Lane 5, h5E12-L230G. (B) Effect of the anti-PCSK9 mAbs on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2. ### p < 0.001 vs. Mock group; *** p < 0.001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. (C,D) Kinetics measurement of h5E12-L230G (C) and Alirocumab (D) binding to surface-immobilized antigen hPCSK9 using a ForteBio Octet QKe system. The biotinylated-hPCSK9 was loaded onto SA sensors and exposed to two-fold serial dilutions of antibody (800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 nM) solutions measure the association rate (kon), and then moved to SD buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.02% Tween 20, 0.1% BSA) without antibodies measure the dissociation rate (koff). Blue and red lines show experimental and calculated fitting sensorgrams, respectively. Kinetic parameters were calculated by global fitting the binding curves (red lines) using Octet data Analysis software 7.1. (E) Intermolecular interaction analyses of the h5E12-L230G with hPCSK9. The prodomain, catalytic domain and C-terminal domain of hPCSK9 are colored in slate, magenta and green, respectively. The heavy chains’ variable regions are shown in skyblue and the light chains’ variable regions in limon. h5E12-L230G binds to the catalytic domain of PCSK9. Key residues involved in the interactions were represented as sticks models and labelled in red font for PCSK9′ key residues, black for h5E12-L230G’ key residues.
Figure 6. Preparation and identification of the full-length anti-PCSK9 antibodies. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified anti-PCSK9 mAbs under non-reducing (left panel, 10% gel) and reducing (right panel, 12% gel) conditions. M, molecular weight marker; Lane 1, Alirocumab; Lane 2, h5E12; Lane 3, h5E12-L230A; Lane 4, h5E12-L230S; Lane 5, h5E12-L230G. (B) Effect of the anti-PCSK9 mAbs on PCSK9-mediated inhibition of LDL-C uptake in HepG2. ### p < 0.001 vs. Mock group; *** p < 0.001 vs. hPCSK9 group. Data are means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. (C,D) Kinetics measurement of h5E12-L230G (C) and Alirocumab (D) binding to surface-immobilized antigen hPCSK9 using a ForteBio Octet QKe system. The biotinylated-hPCSK9 was loaded onto SA sensors and exposed to two-fold serial dilutions of antibody (800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 nM) solutions measure the association rate (kon), and then moved to SD buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.02% Tween 20, 0.1% BSA) without antibodies measure the dissociation rate (koff). Blue and red lines show experimental and calculated fitting sensorgrams, respectively. Kinetic parameters were calculated by global fitting the binding curves (red lines) using Octet data Analysis software 7.1. (E) Intermolecular interaction analyses of the h5E12-L230G with hPCSK9. The prodomain, catalytic domain and C-terminal domain of hPCSK9 are colored in slate, magenta and green, respectively. The heavy chains’ variable regions are shown in skyblue and the light chains’ variable regions in limon. h5E12-L230G binds to the catalytic domain of PCSK9. Key residues involved in the interactions were represented as sticks models and labelled in red font for PCSK9′ key residues, black for h5E12-L230G’ key residues.
Biomedicines 09 01783 g006
Biomedicines 09 01783 g007 550
Figure 7. In vivo hypolipidemic efficacy of h5E12-L230G in hypercholesterolemic model mice. (A) Hepatic LDLR changes in h5E12-L230G or alirocumab treated C57BL/6 mice were detected by Western blot. ### p< 0.001 vs. Normal group. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. Model group. (B) h5E12-L230G demonstrated a significant dose-dependently LDL-C lowering effect similar to alirocumab. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). See Table 1 for detailed value. (C) Hepatic LDLR changes in h5E12-L230G or alirocumab treated C57BL/6 mice were detected by Immunofluorescence. Scale bars = 200 μm. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with similar results.
Figure 7. In vivo hypolipidemic efficacy of h5E12-L230G in hypercholesterolemic model mice. (A) Hepatic LDLR changes in h5E12-L230G or alirocumab treated C57BL/6 mice were detected by Western blot. ### p< 0.001 vs. Normal group. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. Model group. (B) h5E12-L230G demonstrated a significant dose-dependently LDL-C lowering effect similar to alirocumab. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). See Table 1 for detailed value. (C) Hepatic LDLR changes in h5E12-L230G or alirocumab treated C57BL/6 mice were detected by Immunofluorescence. Scale bars = 200 μm. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with similar results.
Biomedicines 09 01783 g007
Table
Table 1. Effects of h5E12-L230G on serum lipids levels in hyperlipidemic mice model.
Table 1. Effects of h5E12-L230G on serum lipids levels in hyperlipidemic mice model.
GroupDose (mg/kg)LDL-C (mmol/L)TC (mmol/L)HDLC (mmol/L)TG (mmol/L)
Normal group/0.624 ± 0.0213.642 ± 0.1611417 ± 0.0420.0921 ± 0.028
Model group 1/1560 ± 0.037 ###5.250 ± 0.212 ###1340 ± 0.0361351 ± 0.049 ###
Alirocumab groupLow dose11506 ± 0.1644.903 ± 0.0711275 ± 0.0661320 ± 0.052
Medium dose31122 ± 0.122 **4650 ± 0.066 **1417 ± 0.0881211 ± 0.048
High dose100.964 ± 0.024 ***4276 ± 0.062 ***1287 ± 0.0541162 ± 0.037 *
h5E12-L230G groupLow dose11480 ± 0.02624.770 ± 0.045 *1462 ± 0.0841312 ± 0.026
Medium dose 31093 ± 0.0395 **4658 ± 0.022 **1333 ± 0.0711196 ± 0.048
High dose 100.996 ± 0.0644 ***4469 ± 0.063 ***1257 ± 0.0441155 ± 0.037 *
1 The model mice exhibited a serum hPCSK9 level of (1152 ± 75) ng/mL determined by an ELISA Kit for human PCSK9 (Cat# E0307h, Eiaab Science Inc., Wuhan, China). * p < 0.05, vs. Model group. ** p < 0.01, vs. Model group. *** p < 0.001, vs. Model group. ### p < 0.001, vs. Normal group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, Z.; Xu, M.; Mei, Y.; Hu, T.; Zhang, P.; Chen, M.; Lv, W.; Lu, C.; Tan, S. Generation of a Novel High-Affinity Antibody Binding to PCSK9 Catalytic Domain with Slow Dissociation Rate by CDR-Grafting, Alanine Scanning and Saturated Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Favorably Treating Hypercholesterolemia. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121783

AMA Style

Bai Z, Xu M, Mei Y, Hu T, Zhang P, Chen M, Lv W, Lu C, Tan S. Generation of a Novel High-Affinity Antibody Binding to PCSK9 Catalytic Domain with Slow Dissociation Rate by CDR-Grafting, Alanine Scanning and Saturated Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Favorably Treating Hypercholesterolemia. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(12):1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121783

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Zhengli, Menglong Xu, Ying Mei, Tuo Hu, Panpan Zhang, Manman Chen, Wenxiu Lv, Chenchen Lu, and Shuhua Tan. 2021. "Generation of a Novel High-Affinity Antibody Binding to PCSK9 Catalytic Domain with Slow Dissociation Rate by CDR-Grafting, Alanine Scanning and Saturated Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Favorably Treating Hypercholesterolemia" Biomedicines 9, no. 12: 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121783

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop