Next Article in Journal
Pre-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Biomarkers for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity and Recurrence-Free Survival in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: An Exploratory Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Baseline Biomarkers Associated with Early Anatomical Response After Faricimab Loading Therapy in Treatment-Naïve Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia

by
Jenny Valentina Garmendia
1,*,
Humberto Azpurua
2,
Alexis Hipólito García
3 and
Juan Bautista De Sanctis
1,*
1
Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Hnevotinska 1333/5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario General de Catalunya, 08195 Barcelona, Spain
3
Institute of Immunology “Nicolás Enrique Bianco”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas 1050, Venezuela
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2026, 14(7), 1591; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071591
Submission received: 7 June 2026 / Revised: 14 July 2026 / Accepted: 14 July 2026 / Published: 16 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunology in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Preeclampsia and Infertility)

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy characterized by target organ damage, affecting approximately 5% of pregnancies. Complex neuroendocrine alterations, vascular imbalances, excessive oxidative stress, environmental factors, and inappropriate immune responses drive the pathology of this condition. Inadequate remodeling of the uterine spiral arteries serves as a fundamental marker of the disease. PE is heavily mediated by an inflammatory cascade involving complement system activation, decreased tolerogenicity of natural killer (NK) cells, M1 macrophage polarization, and dendritic cell alterations. Furthermore, the disease is characterized by a shift toward Th1, Th17, and Th22 cell populations, alongside a decrease in Th2 and regulatory T (Treg) lymphocytes, significantly increasing the risk of maternal autoimmunity. The disorder also disrupts angiogenesis, alters specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators, and impairs responses to infections. Although advancements in immunological treatments have been made, many therapeutic approaches remain under active investigation.

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder characterized by new-onset hypertension (greater than 140/90 mmHg) and end-organ damage, typically arising after the 20th week of gestation and affecting approximately 5% of pregnancies [1,2,3]. A primary indicator of PE is the improper remodeling (transforms narrow, high-resistance uterine vessels into wide, low-resistance conduits) of the uterine spiral arteries during early pregnancy [1,2,3,4]. This inadequate process triggers increased blood pressure and multi-organ dysfunction, which can progress to severe forms such as Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome and eclampsia [2,3,4].
PE is driven by a complex interplay of neuroendocrine changes, vascular imbalances, oxidative stress, and genetic and environmental factors that collectively result in a dysregulated immune response [2,3]. The condition typically presents two distinct phenotypes. Early-onset PE (before 34 weeks) is driven by superficial trophoblastic invasion, altered uteroplacental perfusion, and early immune alterations, often presenting with fetal growth restriction. Conversely, late-onset PE (after 34 weeks) constitutes 80% of cases, involves late syncytiotrophoblast alterations, and is closely associated with maternal cardiometabolic variables [1,2,3]. Early-onset preeclampsia is believed to have significant associations with uteroplacental insufficiency, likely resulting from inadequate placentation. In contrast, late-onset preeclampsia is thought to be more closely linked to maternal risk factors, including elevated body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and nulliparity. Subclusters of early and late PE have been proposed to enhance the understanding of this condition. Currently, PE is widely recognized as a severe inflammatory disorder that is characterized by significant dysfunction of the maternal immune system. This delineation of the two stages is crucial for further exploration and comprehension of the disease’s complexities [3,4,5].
The objective of the present review is to highlight alterations in the immune response associated with PE and other cellular processes. Additionally, the review will provide a comprehensive overview of the impact of infectious diseases. Finally, it will discuss the treatment strategies currently being investigated and proposed.

2. Methodology

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, for peer-reviewed articles published through June 2026. The search strategy focused on identifying high-quality evidence regarding preeclampsia, immune response, oxygen and nitrogen radicals, cell death, angiogenesis, cytokines, immunogenetics, extracellular vesicles, inflammation resolution, and treatment. The search included original articles, meta-analyses and reviews on immunology and preeclampsia, focusing on the following on complement, leukocytes (neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, NK cells, NKT cells, T gamma-delta lymphocytes, T and B lymphocytes, Th1, Th2), cytokines, leptin, angiogenesis, galectins, HLA, KIR, immune checkpoints, leukotrienes, thromboxanes, prostaglandins, resolvins, microARNs, extracellular vesicles, and free radicals (including oxidative stress). Also, infectious diseases and treatment.

3. Innate Immunity in Preeclampsia

3.1. Complement

PE is associated with heightened activation of both the alternative and terminal complement pathways, as well as diminished regulatory mechanisms. Complement over-activation is commonly observed in severe preeclampsia subtypes, especially in HELLP syndrome [6,7].
Complement split products, such as C4d and C5b-9, accumulate significantly in placental tissue, thereby compromising the interface at which maternal blood interacts with fetal cells [6,7]. As critically validated markers, elevated plasma concentrations of the complement components Bb, C5a, and the terminal complex C5b-9, also referred to as the membrane attack complex, indicate increased inflammation and placental injury [5,6]. Furthermore, heightened deposition of C5b-9 in the placenta triggers the release of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), which directly contributes to endothelial dysfunction [5,6,7].
Elevated levels of Factor Bb during the early stages of pregnancy have been identified as a significant biomarker associated with an increased risk of developing [6,7]. Furthermore, substantial urinary excretion of the terminal complement complex, C5b-9, is associated with disease severity [6,7,8]. Consequently, overactivation of the complement system leads to severe placental alterations, characterized by notable increases in C3a, C5a, and C5a-C9 activation products, which are frequently observed in HELLP syndrome [5,6,7,8].
Certain genetic variations in complement regulatory proteins have been identified as factors that may increase women’s susceptibility to severe, early-onset PE and associated conditions [7,8]. Nonetheless, this area of research remains in its developmental stages, necessitating well-designed clinical studies to establish definitive findings.
Given the critical role of complement regulation in preeclampsia, various therapeutic interventions have been evaluated and are discussed in the therapy section at the conclusion of the manuscript.

3.2. Neutrophils and Eosinophils

In the context of PE, neutrophils are integral to the systemic inflammation and vascular damage that define the condition. Increased neutrophil counts, along with a heightened Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), are widely acknowledged as accessible and reliable early indicators of both the risk and severity of PE [9]. Neutrophils are recruited to the placenta through various chemokines, including IL-8/CXCL8, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, and chemotactic lipids [10]. These biochemical signals are predominantly released by the decidua, endometrial epithelial cells, and placental trophoblasts in response to factors such as inflammation, placental debris, or bacterial invasion, including conditions like chorioamnionitis.
Neutrophils produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage the vascular endothelium, promoting hypertension and end-organ injury. Activated neutrophils also interact with decidual endothelial cells, increasing resistance in the placental bed [11,12], and interfere with crucial placental angiogenesis [12]. Furthermore, they disrupt the balance of angiogenic factors by favoring sFlt-1 production, thereby promoting decidual vascular injury [13,14]. Additionally, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are strongly associated with systemic inflammation and inefficient placental perfusion characteristic of PE [15,16].
According to Kong et al. [17], an analysis of first-trimester immune markers indicates that neutrophils may be significantly associated with hypertension in pregnancy. In contrast, monocytes, platelets, and lymphocytes were associated with peripheral inflammation and an increased risk of developing PE. Therefore, the role of neutrophils as key players in hypertension and preeclampsia requires further detailed studies.
PE is characterized by lower eosinophil counts than in normotensive pregnancies; early eosinopenia may serve as a diagnostic marker of inflammation and immune activation, although it has not been validated [18]. The decreased number of circulating eosinophils appears to be associated with elevated levels of the chemokine CCL8 in PE [19]. The role of these cells in pregnancy and related pathologies is not well understood, underscoring the need for further research.

3.3. Mast Cells

Mast cells normally contribute to placental formation; however, in PE, their abnormal activation exacerbates inflammation and alters vascular tone [20]. Mast cells serve as the principal storage sites for histamine, a potent vasoconstrictor that affects placental vasculature. In PE, placental histamine concentrations are generally elevated [20]. Activated mast cells release proteolytic enzymes, including tryptase and chymase [21]. Chymase is particularly notable for its role in converting angiotensin I into angiotensin II, a process that contributes to maternal hypertension [21]. Furthermore, mast cells produce growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), to promote the growth of healthy blood vessels. However, in PE, this process is disrupted [22,23,24,25]. Increased mast cell activity in this condition is associated with a higher rate of extravascular fibrosis and reduced vascularization.
Broekhuizen et al. [26] reported that these innate alterations occur early in early-onset PE, but not in late-onset PE, implying distinct pathophysiological phases. More research should focus on the roles of these cells and their pharmacological modulation in PE.
The presence of other conditions characterized by systemic dysregulation of mast cells, such as Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS), has been associated with an elevated risk of pregnancy complications [27]. These complications include PE, hyperemesis gravidarum, and premature delivery [27]. Additionally, pregnant individuals with atopic disorders or severe asthma, in which mast cells play a crucial role in the immune response, may experience an increased incidence of PE [28]. It has been suggested that non-adherence to asthma treatment during the first trimester and low vitamin D levels prior to pregnancy may contribute to this association [29]. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

3.4. Macrophages

During normal pregnancy, tissue-resident macrophages are crucial for remodeling uterine spiral arteries [30,31]. In PE, macrophage dysfunction leads to insufficient placental development [31]. In preeclamptic women, during the second and third trimesters, inflammatory M1 macrophages dominate the placenta and affect local endothelial cells [31]. This increase in the M1/M2 ratio promotes chronic inflammation by increasing the secretion of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-18, which are associated with reduced blood flow and endothelial damage [31]. In parallel, IL-10 production is reduced, thereby directly impairing trophoblast invasion and contributing to systemic hypertension and proteinuria [31,32,33].
Decidual macrophages play a crucial role in the immunological processes involved in pregnancy. Their interaction with decidual NK cells within the tolerogenic decidual environment is essential for maintaining normal gestation. These cellular components are considered integral to the pathophysiology of PE and represent a viable target for therapeutic intervention.

3.5. Dendritic Cells (DCs)

In PE, dendritic cells (DC) exhibit a pro-inflammatory bias that disrupts maternal-fetal immune tolerance, impairing placental development and causing hypertension and organ damage [34,35]. During the first trimester of pregnancy, decidual cells that constitute the uterine lining secrete chemokines, notably CCL2 and CCL5, in response to inflammatory stimuli, such as Interleukin-1β [34,35]. This secretion facilitates the recruitment of dendritic cells and macrophages to the maternal-fetal interface. Upon their recruitment, these immune cells undergo alterations that can interfere with the normal formation of spiral arteries, subsequently leading to placental hypoxia and dysfunction [34,35]. This process further stimulates the release of pro-inflammatory factors [34,35].
In PE, an increased myeloid DC (mDC)- to-plasmacytoid DC (pDC) ratio promotes Th1 pro-inflammatory responses [35,36]. Abnormal DC activation in this disease triggers a cytokine imbalance favoring Th1 and Th17 profiles, worsening endothelial damage [13,35,36]. Furthermore, dysregulated DCs negatively influence local NK, NKT, and Tγδ cells [36,37], positioning them alongside macrophages as key initiators of PE [36].
Using flow cytometry, Sundarajan et al. [38] proposed that certain dendritic cell subsets, specifically CD1c+ and CD141+, exhibit distinct alterations that may be potential biomarkers for early-onset PE. The test is simple and non-invasive; however, it has not been validated on a large scale. Additionally, research is being conducted on regulatory dendritic cell therapies within preclinical models to prevent the onset of this condition.

3.6. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs)

MDSCs exert crucial immunosuppressive effects that maintain fetal tolerance; they migrate to the placenta in a healthy pregnancy [39,40]. They act by suppressing T and NK cells in the decidua [41]. In PE, the number and function of granulocytic (G-MDSCs) and monocytic (M-MDSCs) subsets may be altered, and this imbalance drives inflammation and vascular dysfunction [32,33,34]. Low circulating MDSC counts in the blood and placenta correlate with disease severity, and their measurement could serve as an early disease marker [34]. PE is also associated with the inhibition of G-MDSCs and their effector enzyme, arginase I [42]. In contrast, the number of M-MDSCs and the expression of Tim-3 on these cells are increased [43]. This increase is accompanied by elevated levels of Galectin-9 in the placenta, which is the ligand for Tim-3 [43]. The role of these cells and their mediators is still under investigation.

3.7. Natural Killer (NK) Cells

NK cells play a critical role in local immune tolerance in normal pregnancy [36,44,45,46,47,48]. Uterine NK cells (CD3-/CD16dim/CD56bright) are vital for spiral artery remodeling and local immunotolerance [44,45,46,47,48]. In PE, NK cells are increased in the peripheral blood and decidual tissue (especially CD16+/CD56+) [36], and their function is also enhanced. In this disease, NK cells produce more IFN-γ and express more activating receptors, such as NKG2C and NKG2D [36,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Nevertheless, some authors have reported reduced decidual CD56+ NK cells, which may explain defective arterial remodeling [50,51,52,53].
The role of NK cells in the decidual environment is critical for the establishment of a healthy pregnancy, as previously reviewed [44]. However, even minor modifications to this environment can prompt a transition in these cells from a tolerogenic to a cytotoxic state [36,44]. There exist three distinct subpopulations of decidual NK (dNK) cells [44]. In the context of preeclampsia (PE), there is an observed shift among these subpopulations: a reduction in the tolerogenic dNK1 and an increase in the more cytotoxic dNK3, which is further associated with the secretion of inflammatory cytokines [36,44]. This alteration ultimately facilitates the migration and activation of macrophages and T cells, thereby intensifying the local inflammatory response.
Local suppressive compounds delivered with nanocarriers and cellular therapies have been proposed and partially studied, while significant research continues on the role of NK cell modulation in pregnancy-related complications [44,45].

3.8. NKT Cells

NKT cells, which serve as a link between innate and adaptive immunity, exhibit elevated levels in PE and contribute to systemic inflammation through a Th1-dominant profile [53]. The increased prevalence of these cells may impair decidual NK cell function, resulting in placental dysfunction. Furthermore, NKT cells can activate NK cells by producing IFN-γ, enhancing the inflammatory burden [36,52]. Pharmacological treatments for recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure can reduce the inflammatory effects of these cells [45], although specific mechanisms remain under investigation.

3.9. T Gamma-Delta Lymphocytes (Tγδ)

Tγδ cells recognize antigens independently of the major histocompatibility complex and are associated with a Th1 immune response [54,55,56]. These cells play a key role in the local tolerogenic response in normal pregnancy [45]. In pregnancies affected by PE, peripheral Tγδ cells show a significant increase in both abundance and function, including elevated secretion of perforin and INF-γ when compared to healthy pregnancies [57]. Nevertheless, more research is needed to understand the specific role of these cells in PE.

4. Adaptive Immunity in Preeclampsia

4.1. T Lymphocytes

T lymphocytes constitute a significant proportion of decidual mononuclear cells [58]. In PE, an imbalance in T lymphocyte subpopulations occurs, wherein effector cells increase while regulatory networks fail, rendering the fetus susceptible to maternal immune attack [45,59]. This cellular imbalance correlates strongly with elevated endoglin (a cytokine that neutralizes TGF-β) and widespread inflammation [59,60,61,62,63,64].
While a predominant Th2 immunotolerant profile characterizes a typical pregnancy, PE is distinguished by a severe pathophysiological shift toward a Th1-dominant response, characterized by the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α [63,64].
Th17 cells drive robust inflammatory responses that play a key role in PE [58,59]. In PE, Th17-derived cytokines (IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22) are significantly elevated, thereby accelerating the inflammatory cascade of the disease [65,66,67,68,69,70]. Th17 levels correlate inversely with circulating regulatory T cells [71]. Th22 lymphocytes, which produce IL-22 but not IL-17, are likewise elevated in PE and involved in tissue remodeling and inflammatory response [59,69,70,72], though their precise pathogenic role remains unclear.
Tregs are essential for maintaining maternal-fetal immune tolerance [73]. In contrast to normal pregnancies [74,75], Tregs in PE are significantly decreased in number and function across both peripheral blood and decidual tissues [76,77,78,79]. The Treg/Th17 ratio is markedly reduced [11,43], making early quantification of Tregs a potential predictive biomarker for the disease [79,80]. Key Treg alterations in PE include reduced paternal/fetal antigen-specific Tregs, decreased CD4+CD25+FoxP3high (activated) Treg, and altered naïve/effector Treg balance [73]. In summary, in PE, maternal-fetal immune homeostasis breaks down, characterized by reductions in Tregs, tolerogenic dNK cells, and decidual macrophages, along with infiltration of effector T cells, resulting in chronic inflammation [44,45,73,79,80]. Advancements in pharmacological therapy remain necessary to mitigate cell migration and activation, which contribute to the onset of PE.
Even though quantifying Tregs and the Th17/Treg ratio is a simple flow cytometry test using a small amount of peripheral blood, it has not been validated as a routine test by the American or European societies.

4.2. B Lymphocytes and Preeclampsia

Assessment of B lymphocyte subsets—particularly CD19+CD5+ cells, IL-10–producing B cells, and B1 lymphocytes—represents a promising early risk marker for PE, although it has not been fully validated [11,81,82,83,84,85]. B cells play a critical role in PE pathogenesis by producing pathogenic autoantibodies, most notably those targeting the angiotensin II type I receptor, which directly elevate blood pressure and disrupt placental function [81,82,85]. Memory B cells play a crucial role in autoimmune diseases and likely also in PE [85]. Interestingly, few studies have examined the role of B cells in pregnant women with autoimmune diseases. Well-defined, validated autoimmune therapy may be important in several pregnancy complications. Further research is needed in this area.

5. Angiogenesis and Preeclampsia

Recent theories suggest that PE is a complex disease with two clinical presentations: the placental phenotype, characterized by superficial trophoblastic invasion and fetal growth restriction. In contrast, the maternal phenotype shows normal fetal growth but mild maternal inflammation due to placental oxidative stress and lesions [86,87].
The first stage of early gestation involves abnormal, asymptomatic placental invasion and differentiation. Normally, the embryo-derived cytotrophoblast penetrates the uterine wall and remodels the spiral arteries into wide, low-resistance vessels [88]. In PE, this invasion is incomplete and restricted to superficial decidual layers, leading to decreased uteroplacental perfusion and ischemia [88]. The second stage involves clinical signs of PE, in which chronic placental hypoperfusion leads to the abnormal release of bioactive factors into the maternal circulation [88,89,90,91]. These factors cause widespread endothelial dysfunction, vasospasm, reduced plasma volume, oxidative stress, and a hyperinflammatory state [88,89,90,91].
A key concern in pregnancy-related conditions like PE is vascular and endothelial dysfunction [2,90,91]. Placental ischemia releases anti-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory factors, leading to an imbalance in which anti-angiogenic factors exceed pro-angiogenic factors [88,90,91,92,93]. This imbalance drives endothelial dysfunction, arterial vasoconstriction, and hypertension [2,88,90,91,92,93].
Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) promotes trophoblast growth, while Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) supports endothelial health and vessel formation [88,92,93]. Both factors are pro-angiogenic and work together [88,92,93]. Soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 1 (sFlt-1), a VEGF receptor variant, circulates in maternal blood and antagonizes both VEGF and PlGF, thereby hindering their action [88,92,93]. The placenta is the primary source of sFlt-1 during pregnancy, and its levels can be up to fivefold higher in patients with PE [2,88,92,93], leading to vasoconstriction and endothelial dysfunction. Decreased PlGF levels are associated with the onset of PE, and the sFlt-1-to-PlGF ratio is a reliable predictor of PE and its complications [2,94,95,96,97]. Additionally, soluble Endoglin (sEng), which regulates VEGF, TGF-β, and PlGF, is also elevated in PE patients [93,94]. Table 1 illustrates the clinical significance of the sFIT/PIGF ratio. These are clinically validated markers that are useful for making medical decisions in PE.

6. Galectins in Preeclampsia

Galectins are crucial carbohydrate-binding proteins for a healthy pregnancy, regulating embryonic implantation, maternal-fetal immune tolerance, and placental development [98,99]. In PE, their functions are impaired, and they may serve as clinical biomarkers [98,99]. Figure 1 illustrates the different events involved in galectin transcription and expression in pregnancy.
In normal pregnancy, galectin-1 is highly expressed in the endometrium and placenta, where it facilitates early trophoblast invasion, regulates maternal immune tolerance, and promotes the remodeling of spiral arteries [98,99]. Galectin-3, which is expressed across various trophoblast lineages, plays a critical role in cell migration, tissue remodeling, and angiogenesis [98,99]. Galectin-13, also known as Placental Protein 13 (PP13), is exclusively expressed in the placenta and is essential for the structural integrity necessary for the initial anchoring of the placenta to the uterus [99,100]. Galectin 14 is also associated with migration and invasion, and consequently, along with galectin 13, is critical for trophoblast survival [99,100].
In PE, impaired placental formation and immune tolerance lead to the release of anti-angiogenic factors such as sFlt-1 and to widespread inflammation [99,100]. Galectins play a key role in this process: elevated levels of galectin-7 disrupt normal placentation, increase anti-angiogenic factors, and contribute to hypertension [99,100]. Low serum galectin-3 levels are observed in impaired placentation in early-onset PE [101]. Galectin-1 low maternal serum levels in the first trimester are linked to poor placentation and adverse pregnancy outcomes [99,100,101]. Galectin 9 is also critical in PE, as increased production by trophoblasts is associated with a decreased remodeling of the uterine spiral arteries [102]. Figure 2 shows the different roles of specific galectins in placentation and their levels related to PE.
As the clinical markers for PE continue to be delineated, the evaluation of sFlt-1/PGIF has emerged as a validated method for characterizing the condition. Additionally, galectins 1, 3, and 9 may function as biomarkers within well-defined clinical cohorts. These biomarkers likely also serve as effective indicators of therapeutic efficacy during pregnancy.

7. Immunogenetics and Preeclampsia

7.1. The Role of Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) in Preeclampsia

HLA complexes, which differentiate self from non-self, are classified into class I (A, B, C; non-classical E, F, G) and class II [103,104]. Increased PE risk is associated with HLA-A matching, Class I matching, and combined Class I and Class II matching between mother and fetus [105]. In preeclamptic pregnancies, maternal-fetal HLA-C matching may be unexpectedly high [103,104,105], although some studies show no correlation [103]. In oocyte-donation pregnancies, greater fetal-maternal HLA class II mismatch increases the risk of PE [105,106,107]. The HLA-DPB1*04:01:01G allele is more frequent in severe PE/eclampsia [108]. Non-classical HLA-F and HLA-G molecules, which promote maternal immune tolerance, are also implicated, with lower placental HLA-G expression and soluble HLA-G levels observed in PE [109]. Additionally, genetic variants of HLA-F and HLA-G show mixed associations with PE across studies [110,111,112].
HLA genotyping in PE has primarily been regarded as a research tool rather than a diagnostic tool. However, the straightforward measurement of blood anti-HLA antibodies, typically employed in transplantation and infrequently used in studies of recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure, warrants further investigation in the context of PE, as suggested by Lee et al. [113]. Thus, further studies on the mechanisms involving genetics, the immune response, and circulating biomarkers are required in PE.

7.2. Role of Killer Immunoglobulin-like Receptors (KIR) in Preeclampsia

KIRs are found mainly on NK cells and can either inhibit or activate them. It has been suggested that patients with PE have a higher presence of activating receptors [114]. Mothers lacking most or all activating KIRs (AA genotype) carrying a fetus with HLA-C2 are at a significantly increased risk of PE [115]. However, the Danish cohort showed no significant difference in maternal KIR AA frequency and fetal HLA-C2 [116]. The complexity of KIR expression in cells does not necessarily align with the observed genetic arrays, as receptor expression also depends on the tissue milieu [45].
To elucidate the role of KIR in PE, it is essential to conduct a localized assessment of KIR expression in decidual NK and T cells. Vinnars et al. [117] have demonstrated an elevated expression of NKG2D (CD314) in decidual NK cells. This heightened expression may correlate with an increased fetal expression of stress ligands for the NKG2D receptor, specifically the MICA/B and ULBP proteins. Consequently, a well-defined hypothesis warranting testing and validation should be established. Furthermore, this mechanism may contribute to the understanding of other non-classical events associated with PE.
Figure 3 illustrates the importance of HLA C, E and G in the interaction between trophoblasts and NK cells.

8. Immune Checkpoints in Preeclampsia

Immune checkpoints regulate immune responses and maintain tolerance [118]. PD-1 is present on most decidual cell types, while PD-L1 is found on extravillous trophoblast, syncytiotrophoblast, and maternal-fetal interface immune cells [119]. In preeclamptic placentas, PD-1 and PD-L1 levels decrease, indicating a loss of fetal immune tolerance linked to JAK2/STAT5 pathways and reduced GM-CSF regulation [119,120]. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway affects decidual macrophage polarization, with checkpoint inhibitors potentially shifting these macrophages to M1, enhancing local inflammation [119,120]. The use of checkpoint inhibitors in therapy remains experimental, making it essential to conduct well-designed studies to evaluate their therapeutic effects.
CTLA-4 inhibits CD28-mediated stimulation of T lymphocytes and exhibits altered expression in PE [121]. The CTLA-4 49A-G polymorphism (rs231775) has been linked to reduced CTLA-4 levels, suggesting it may be a risk factor for the development of PE, although meta-analyses have yielded inconsistent findings [122]. Additionally, TIM-3 and its ligand, Galectin-9, which suppress T lymphocyte activity [121,123], exhibit altered expression in placental macrophages and Hofbauer cells in PE, potentially associated with inadequate fetal implantation [121,123,124].
The roles of various immune checkpoints, including CD276, LAG-3, and CD73, remain subjects of ongoing research. Further investigation of checkpoint control is essential to enhance our understanding of PE. However, there seems to be no direct role of checkpoint inhibitors as a therapeutic tool in PE.

9. Extracellular Vesicles in Preeclampsia

Extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, microparticles, migrasomes, and apoptotic bodies, are integral components of intercellular communication [125,126]. These membrane-bound vesicles serve as essential mediators of cell–cell signaling [125]. Furthermore, extracellular vesicles are posited to significantly influence and regulate placental–maternal vascular communication. In normal pregnancy, their effects can be immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory based on their origin and content [127,128]. In PE, plasma levels of placenta-derived vesicles are elevated, carrying pro-inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic factors that exacerbate vascular dysfunction and oxidative stress [129,130]. These vesicles, along with neutrophil extracellular traps, significantly damage vascular endothelia [130]. Modulating vesicle secretion is a promising therapeutic approach, and acetylsalicylic acid has been shown to reduce its harmful effects in PE [131,132,133,134].
The surface markers of extracellular vesicles include tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81), endosomal/MVB proteins, cell-specific markers depending on vesicle origin, and other functional proteins such as annexins and heat shock proteins (Figure 4) [125,126]. However, there is growing recognition in extracellular vesicle research of the significance of the functional plasma protein corona that forms on the surfaces of lipid particles [126]. The corona is formed by apolipoproteins A1, B, C3, and E; complement factors C3 and C4B; the alpha chain of fibrinogen; and the heavy chains of immunoglobulins. This corona is known to either enhance or inhibit the uptake of extracellular vesicles, thereby influencing their size and, consequently, their functionality [126]. The impact of pregnancy and PE on the composition of the corona surrounding extracellular vesicles remains largely unexplored; therefore, further investigation is imperative to elucidate these effects.
Extracellular vesicles are crucial for a healthy pregnancy, facilitating vasodilation and modulating maternal immune responses [125,126,127,128,129]. They are released from extravillous trophoblasts, aiding in early spiral artery remodeling and placental establishment [126,127,128,129]. Previous studies show that placental-derived extracellular vesicles enhance endothelial cell proliferation and migration, as well as vascular smooth muscle cell migration during placentation. Additionally, their numbers increase in maternal circulation as gestation progresses, highlighting their importance throughout pregnancy. However, most of the authors have focused on the role of these vesicles in maternal responses rather than in local responses. Figure 4 illustrates the differences between the vesicles in normal pregnancy and PE.
In early-onset PE, the contents of vesicles appear to be associated with various biological pathways. These pathways include innate immune mechanisms and various enzymatic activities, such as catalytic and peroxidase functions [126,127,128]. Additionally, key proteins of interest include annexins, integrins, histones, heat shock proteins, and cytoskeletal proteins. (Figure 4). Nevertheless, there remains ongoing debate regarding the specificity of these proteins in relation to preeclampsia, both in early and late stages of the condition.
Hypoxia seems to enhance the biochemical composition and increase the number of placental extracellular vesicles released [126,127]. However, specific details of the contents remain the subject of ongoing research. Since both hypoxia and hyperoxia may contribute to the development of preeclampsia, these placental-derived extracellular vesicles likely play a role in the condition’s pathophysiology, particularly in damaging maternal vasculature [126,127]. Current research on the impact of extracellular vesicles in preeclampsia suggests they contribute to blood vessel injury by promoting platelet aggregation and adhesion to the endothelium. Additionally, these vesicles mediate the vascular dysfunction associated with preeclampsia, including reduced vasodilation, increased vascular inflammation, and altered cell proliferation and remodeling that are required for vascular repair.
Research on placental-derived extracellular vesicles in preeclampsia has been limited. Studies show that these vesicles can disrupt bradykinin-induced relaxation in uterine arteries, suggesting a role in vascular constriction [126,127]. However, they also reduce constrictor responses to phenylephrine and serotonin in omental arteries. In contrast, vesicles from normotensive pregnancies enhance vasoconstriction via endothelin-1 and decrease constriction from angiotensin II in subcutaneous arteries [126,127]. The exact role of these vesicles in vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia remains unclear; further investigation is needed, particularly between early- and late-onset preeclampsia, as well as in therapeutic contexts using cell lines.
Mesenchymal stromal extracellular vesicles interact with various immune components, including T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, and natural killer cells. They are crucial for reducing inflammation, modulating immune cell activation, and lowering pro-inflammatory cytokine production. These vesicles, particularly from mesenchymal stem cells, also promote angiogenesis, reduce fibrosis, and enhance cardiac function.

10. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and Preeclampsia

miRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression [135] and are linked to PE and preterm birth, potentially serving as biomarkers for these conditions [136]. Several miRs have been shown to be over- or underexpressed in PE, as illustrated in the Table 2. Notably, miR-210, which is elevated under hypoxic conditions, is present at higher levels in preeclamptic placentas and serum, whereas miR-483-3p, associated with trophoblast invasion, is reduced. Additionally [137,138], miR-155 is overexpressed in women with PE, facilitating the release of TNF-α and IL-6 [136,137,138,139]. The levels of miRs can be modulated by acetylsalicylic acid in patients at risk of PE [137].
As illustrated in Figure 4, the content of extracellular vesicles is dependent on the process, normal pregnancy, tolerogenic, or PE, proinflammatory. Although it has been suggested that miRs can be used for diagnosis or as predictive markers, standardized protocols and large clinical trials are needed to validate their use in PE. In addition, several miRs have been proposed for therapeutic purposes, and promising pharmacological tools to deliver the miRs have already been developed.
Table 2. miRNAs involved in PE.
Table 2. miRNAs involved in PE.
miRNA
Increased
TargetObservation
miR-155 (1) Alters SMAD2 and SMAD5 members of the TGFβ signaling pathway.
(2) Decrease T regulatory cells, downregulate CTLA4 transcription and function. (3) Regulates Vascular Peroxidase 1 and oxidative stress and mitochondrial glucose metabolism via skeletal muscle.
Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61)/miR-155 Ratio has been proposed as a
biomarker for Diagnosis
and severity of PE
miR-125b Downregulates the Kv1.1 voltage-gated potassium channel and glypican 1, a cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan. It inhibits cytotrophoblast invasion and disrupts endothelial cell function.Predictive marker and a potential therapeutic target.
miR-181a-5pDownregulates genes involved in the MAPK/ERK signal pathway.Associated with the worst outcomes in patients with E.
miR-29bIt inhibits Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA) and reduces anti-apoptotic proteins like Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 (MCL1), while downregulating essential enzymes (MMP2 and MMP9) required for placental cell invasion of the uterine wall.Marker of PE severity
miR-206Regulates genes in Muscle Development and Regeneration, tumor suppression, proliferation, neurodevelopment, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.Proposed as a diagnostic marker
miR-495Impedes normal placental development by repressing Histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), accelerating cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, while decreasing apoptosis via the P53/PUMA pathway.Proposed as a diagnostic marker
miR-125bIt inhibits trophoblast Invasion and function. Placental exosomes transfer miR-125b into endothelial cells, disrupting the endothelial barrier. It induces the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines.Proposed as a diagnostic marker
miR-206Inhibits trophoblast invasion and promotes placental inflammation. Suppresses the AGTR1 (Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1) gene. Downregulates VEGFA,Diagnostic biomarker
MiR-517 and
miR-526
Trophoblast dysfunction, hypoxia, and angiogenic imbalance. Endothelial damage. Promising diagnostic marker of PE
miR-17Suppresses key angiogenesis genes (like VEGFA, Hypoxia-inducing factor 1A (HIF1A), and the Ephrin system).Proposed as a biomarker.
miRNA
decreased
The decrease impairsObservation
miR-21(1) Trophoblast invasion and function are decreased, and apoptosis is increased, (2) poor spiral artery remodeling and chronic hypoxiaLower miR-21 levels in the first trimester are associated with the future onset and severity of preeclampsia and serve as a marker for early detection.
miR-146a(1) Proliferation, reduced invasion, and increased apoptosis of trophoblast cells, (2) Decreased spiral artery remodeling, and (3) overactivation of NFkB inflammatory pathways.Proposed as a diagnostic marker and for PE therapeutics.
miR-126(1) Angiogenesis, decreasing placental vasculogenesis, (2) trophoblast invasion and placental development, and (3) endothelial and trophoblast viability.Proposed as a diagnostic marker and for PE therapeutics.
miR-195(1) The healthy invasion and migration of trophoblast cells, (2) reduces VEGF production and angiogenesis, and (3) increases the hypoxia-induced damage and oxidative stress.Proposed as a diagnostic marker and for PE therapeutics.
miR-363 (1) Poor placentation, including inadequate trophoblast migration and impaired spiral artery remodeling. (2) Decrease VEGFA secretion.Proposed as an early-stage marker of PE.
Table legend: The table represents the different miRs that have been reported and proposed as good biomarkers for PE. The table was adapted from recent reviews of the literature [140,141,142].

11. Cytokines and Leptin in Preeclampsia

In PE, the imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines induces vascular damage and increases vascular resistance in the placental bed [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150]. Figure 5 illustrates the cytokines involved in PE. The key tolerogenic cytokines, along with the critical growth factors crucial for vascularization, trophoblast invasion, and survival, are decreased, while the proinflammatory and activating cytokines are increased. Proinflammatory cytokines are also increased in the mother’s bloodstream. Essential hypertension and autoimmune disorders also play an important role in the proinflammatory event. These events may be exacerbated in metabolic disorders (e.g., obesity, diabetes). Still, well-designed clinical studies are required to determine the importance of genetic polymorphisms in cytokines in PE.
Cytokine gene polymorphisms such as the IL-4 VNTR [151] and the IL-17A SNP (rs2275913) have been associated with PE [152]. Gene polymorphism may aid in the generation of genetic clusters of the disease.
Leptin, a hormone produced by fat cells, is elevated in maternal circulation and placental tissue in PE and can precede symptoms such as hypertension and proteinuria, making it a potential early biomarker [153,154,155,156,157,158]. High leptin levels are associated with systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, thereby affecting maternal blood vessel integrity [149,150,151]. Our group found differences in leptin levels between mild and severe PE and noted elevated levels in hypertensive pregnant women before conception [154]. We also established a correlation between serum leptin and platelet count in preeclamptic patients, with levels decreasing after antihypertensive treatment [154]. Excess leptin is associated with vascular constriction, placental hypoxia, and increased pro-inflammatory markers [155,156,157,158]. Obesity increases the risk of PE, likely due to elevated leptin levels. Monitoring leptin in early pregnancy could help identify women at higher risk of PE [154,155,156,157,158,159,160], underscoring the urgent need for pharmacological modulation of leptin.
Further research is needed on underinvestigated cytokines with altered profiles in PE, such as IL-1β, IL-1RA [161], IL-2 [162], IL-23 [163], IL-27 [164], and IL-37/IL-38 [165].

12. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, Thromboxanes, and Resolvins

Metabolites derived from arachidonic acid, leukotrienes, and thromboxanes play a critical role in PE [166,167]. Increased thromboxane synthesis in platelets contributes to vascular resistance and platelet aggregation, which are characteristic of this disease [167]. Leukotriene B4 is elevated in serum and placentas [168], while vasodilatory prostacyclin [166] and PGE2 are notably reduced [169,170]. Although aspirin limits cyclooxygenase activity and can prevent PE, drug resistance has been described [171].
Specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), such as resolvins, help resolve inflammation and prevent tissue damage by inhibiting leukocyte migration, enhancing macrophage phagocytosis of dying leukocytes, and boosting IL-10 levels [172,173]. The reports on resolving levels in PE are contradictory. Some find reduced resolvin D1 concentration in preeclamptic patients, along with a decreased resolving/leukotriene B4 ratio [174]. Other studies have demonstrated increased resolvins in these patients, particularly in those with metabolic syndrome and in early pregnancy stages [175,176]. Methodological differences account for these discrepancies, highlighting the need for structured SPM analyses alongside w-3 fatty acid supplementation trials.
Figure 6 depicts the relationship of SPMs in normal pregnancy and the influence of pro-inflammatory metabolites derived from arachidonic acid. A critical observation is that these compounds are transient and produced locally. Their biological effects depend on the expression of specific receptors, which may include non-specific receptors for these intermediates.

13. Radicals and Preeclampsia

13.1. Oxygen Radicals

The interplay between oxidative stress and PE follows a two-stage model [177]. Stage 1 involves placental ischemia, fluctuating oxygen levels, and excess ROS production due to incomplete arterial remodeling. Stage 2 sees ROS enter the maternal bloodstream, causing inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, which manifests as hypertension and proteinuria. Mitochondrial dysfunction in the placenta generates significant ROS [178] and leaked free fetal hemoglobin due to oxidative damage, which interacts with nitric oxide to generate free radicals, driving hypertension and renal impairment [179]. Additionally, up-regulated NADPH oxidase and xanthine oxidase in preeclamptic placentas further increase superoxide and free radical production [180].
Critical markers of oxidative damage in PE include malondialdehyde [181], 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine [177], ischemia-modified albumin [182], elevated uric acid [183], and hypoxia [184]. This ROS overproduction impairs trophoblast proliferation and reduces VEGF expression [185]. While general antioxidants (vitamins C and E) lack consistent efficacy in preventing PE, mitochondria-targeted antioxidant therapies show promise [177,184,186,187]. Radical-induced senescence is also an emerging topic of interest [188].
The regulation of local production of oxygen and hydroxide radicals (as illustrated in Figure 4) is a crucial aspect of PE pathophysiology, as elevated levels of these radicals can generate various intermediates. This process subsequently induces hypoxia, cellular apoptosis, and inflammatory responses.

13.2. Nitric Oxide, Peroxynitrite, and Protein Modifications

Nitric oxide (NO) mediates vasodilation and regulates placental blood flow, cytotrophoblast endovascular invasion, and angiogenesis [189,190,191,192]. Inhibiting NO synthase (NOS) induces PE-like symptoms in animal models [193]. In human PE, serum NO levels (determined by its oxidation products, nitrites and nitrates) are reduced [194,195,196], leading to vasoconstriction, abnormal perfusion, and heightened pressor sensitivity [195,196,197]. The VEGF promotes vasodilation via endothelial NOS (eNOS) [198], and the combination of eNOS deficiency and sFlt-1 overexpression synergistically worsens renal dysfunction [199,200]. A connection between sEng and NO has been established [201,202], and TGF-β1, a target of sEng, initiates eNOS-mediated vasorelaxation [94]. Understanding NO metabolism is crucial for elucidating the role of the endothelium in the pathogenesis of PE [203].
When NO reacts with superoxide, it forms peroxynitrite, a potent oxidant implicated in endothelial dysfunction in PE. This results in protein nitration and higher levels of 3-nitrotyrosine, a marker for PE [182,191,192,193]. Elevated peroxynitrite levels in maternal blood and placenta lead to oxidative stress, increased vascular resistance, and decreased NO availability [195,204,205,206]. Peroxynitrite activates the NFκB pathway, resulting in enhanced expression of the lectin-type oxidized LDL receptor (LOX-1) and increasing the transcription of arginase II. Increased Arginase II depletes cellular L-arginine, an essential substrate for eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase). This leads to eNOS “uncoupling,” resulting in increased superoxide production rather than the protective NO, which worsens oxidative damage [195,207]. Barbosa et al. reviewed the potential role of oxidative stress modulation in PE [203]. The events are summarized in Figure 7.
Excessive NO radicals lead to S-nitrosylation of proteins, hindering placentation [208] and promoting cell death [209]. Kulandavelu et al. [210] suggested that increased S-nitrosylation in placentas results from a deficiency of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase associated with preeclampsia. This enzyme deficiency has also been associated with various pathologies, including diabetes, through its effects on autophagy [211]. Figure 8 illustrates the different types of cell death in PE.
Hypoxic stress in PE also enhances protein SUMOylation, leading to trophoblast shedding and decreased PlGF [212,213]. Thereby, exosome SUMO protein analysis is a potential tool for predicting preeclampsia [214]. A low dose of aspirin may affect SUMOylation [215].

14. Cell Death in Preeclampsia

PE is characterized by increased trophoblast cell death due to oxidative stress, hypoxia, protein modifications [216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230], and nutrient deprivation [228,230]. Apoptosis is a normal process in pregnancy and is enhanced in PE [216,217]. On the other hand, necroptosis culminates in necrosis after inefficient apoptosis, releasing stress proteins and danger signals that amplify the inflammatory response [219,220,230]. Pyroptosis is also an interesting phenomenon in PE, probably linked to the genetic proinflammatory background [221,222]. Ferroptosis is linked to a complex process involving reactive radicals [223,224,225]. This cell death releases syncytial knots and debris into the maternal circulation, triggering systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction through danger signals that activate the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway [228]. Cuproptosis has been reported in PE and its genetic link to possible predisposition [226,227].
Figure 8 shows the different types of cell death reported in PE, along with the major intermediates. It is important to stress that apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and cuproptosis have been reported in the placenta, whereas necrosis [218] has been reported in maternal liver as a consequence of severe PE.
Figure 8. Types of cell death reported in PE. The key elements related to each type of cell death are described. The figure is based on references [216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230].
Figure 8. Types of cell death reported in PE. The key elements related to each type of cell death are described. The figure is based on references [216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230].
Biomedicines 14 01591 g008

15. Infectious Diseases and Preeclampsia

Bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections trigger inflammatory cascades pivotal to PE pathogenesis [231,232,233]. The TORCH complex (Toxoplasmosis, Syphilis, Rubella, cytomegalovirus, Herpes/HIV) and, more recently, the Zika virus, are responsible for transplacental transmission and complications [233,234,235,236,237]. Other pathogens, including Chlamydia trachomatis [238], Toxoplasma gondii [239,240,241], Trichomonas vaginalis (which increases IL-8 and galectin secretion) [242], Plasmodium and Trypanosoma cruzi [243,244], represent elevated PE risks.
Malaria, particularly Plasmodium falciparum, is a major risk factor, leading to decreased uterine perfusion, reduced NO production, and increased levels of sFlt-1, endoglin, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (a known PE marker) [245,246,247,248,249]. In patients with malaria-preeclampsia comorbidity, placental villous maturity and villous volume density are significantly reduced in comparison with normal pregnancy [249].
Viral infections such as cytomegalovirus, adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV-2), SARS-CoV-2, herpes simplex virus, Epstein–Barr virus, and HIV are associated with an increased probability of PE [250]. Von Dadelszen et al. [250] reported elevated anti-CMV antibody levels in patients with early-onset preeclampsia. Moreover, increased Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 expressions have been reported in CMV infection and preeclampsia [251,252], accompanied by elevated IL-6 and TNF-α levels and reduced IL-10 [251,252]. Placental AAV-2 infection rates were significantly higher in patients with preeclampsia than in normotensive patients [253], and a 5.6-fold increase in anti-AAV-2 IgM was observed in preeclampsia patients who experienced fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, or fetal demise [254]. SARS-CoV-2 induces systemic endothelial damage and microvascular dysfunction mimicking PE, though definitive diagnostic criteria suggest the virus exacerbates comorbidities rather than directly increasing PE incidence [255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262].
In summary, inflammatory responses to infections play a pivotal role in the development of PE (shifts from Th2 to Th1 cytokine profiles, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, increased oxidative stress, and upregulated anti-angiogenic proteins (Figure 9) [232,233]. More research is needed in this area.
Figure 9. The impact of infection and microbiota dysbiosis on both peripheral and localized immune responses is significant. Infections caused by pathogens, as well as dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, can activate the peripheral immune response, subsequently influencing the interactions between immune cells and trophoblast function at the local level. Furthermore, these conditions can trigger autoimmune responses through mechanisms such as antigen mimicry. Localized infections within the uterus can alter the decidual environment, provoking a local inflammatory response that may result in the apoptosis of trophoblast cells. This information is derived from existing literature on the subject [231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271]. The possible role of the placental microbiome is still controversial, and it is highlighted by the question mark.
Figure 9. The impact of infection and microbiota dysbiosis on both peripheral and localized immune responses is significant. Infections caused by pathogens, as well as dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, can activate the peripheral immune response, subsequently influencing the interactions between immune cells and trophoblast function at the local level. Furthermore, these conditions can trigger autoimmune responses through mechanisms such as antigen mimicry. Localized infections within the uterus can alter the decidual environment, provoking a local inflammatory response that may result in the apoptosis of trophoblast cells. This information is derived from existing literature on the subject [231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271]. The possible role of the placental microbiome is still controversial, and it is highlighted by the question mark.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g009

16. Microbiota and Preeclampsia

Recent evidence shows distinct microbiota in the uterine cavity, vagina, and placenta, challenging the “sterile womb” hypothesis [263,264,265]. Dysbiosis during pregnancy affects metabolic and immune homeostasis, potentially contributing to PE (Figure 9) [266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278]. Third-trimester microbiota from women with PE resemble those associated with metabolic diseases, and fecal transplants from women in the third trimester cause weight gain and inflammation in mice [274,275,276,277,278]. In PE, beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus decrease, while Saccharibacteria increase [277,278]. Fecal transplants from patients with PE trigger inflammatory responses in pregnant rats, suggesting that probiotics or fecal transplants may be potential therapies [267,271].

17. Autoimmune Diseases and Preeclampsia

Rheumatic autoimmune diseases have an 8–10% prevalence and notably increase the risk of PE, infertility, and intrauterine growth restriction (25.3% vs. 6.1% in healthy controls) [279,280]. Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, thrombotic events, and/or obstetric complications, which can result in inadequate trophoblastic invasion [281,282,283,284]. Between 25% and 50% of women with APS experience PE, and antibody levels correlate with disease severity [281,282,283,284,285,286]. Similarly, patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) have a threefold risk of PE [286,287,288,289,290,291]. A recent study in Sweden demonstrated a reduction in the proportion of patients with SLE who had PE over the past two decades, likely associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine and low-dose aspirin [292].
Although pain in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) often improves in early pregnancy [293], there is an increased risk of fetal growth restriction [294]. One study demonstrated an increased risk of PE in patients with psoriatic arthritis but not in pregnant patients with AS [295].
Women with systemic sclerosis have a higher incidence of PE [296,297,298]. Conversely, having a history of PE increases the subsequent risk of developing scleroderma by 69% [298]. A case–control study found that women who later developed scleroderma also had a higher incidence of hypertension during pregnancy [299].
Both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism increase the risk of PE [300,301,302]. A meta-analysis found that patients with PE often had abnormal thyroid function test results [303]. One study indicated that autoimmune thyroiditis slightly increased the risk of PE [304], whereas another did not find a link between thyroid autoimmunity and PE [305].
There are still many unanswered questions relating to autoimmunity and PE. However, autoantibodies can be a useful marker for clinical management during pregnancy (Table 3).

18. Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and Preeclampsia

AD is linked to a modestly increased risk of PE, and PE is a prenatal risk factor for childhood eczema, suggesting a bidirectional relationship between immune programming in PE pregnancies and the atopic spectrum. This correlation may involve immune mechanisms, including NK cell pathways influenced by KIR genes [310,311,312]. These findings have opened new avenues for research and necessitate well-structured clinical trials to determine the relationship between allergic diseases and PE.

19. Immunological Treatments

Current therapies for PE emphasize prevention in high-risk women. Currently, apart from childbirth, there are no approved treatments that can effectively halt the progression of PE once it has been established. A summary of various published treatments [313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324,325] is provided below.
Low-dose aspirin (LDA) remains the first-line preventive treatment, reducing the risk of PE by 62% through anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effects [313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320]. Figure 10 illustrates the effects of aspirin treatment on the endometrium/placenta and peripheral. The effect of low-dose aspirin can be considered protective in patients at risk. Nonetheless, large-scale clinical trials may be important to ascertain the effect of the therapy at early stages and during pregnancy as a monotherapy or with heparin.
Low molecular weight heparin has been proposed as an effective treatment for high-risk PE patients [321,322,323,324,325]. According to a meta-analysis, the combination of LDA and low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduces the risk of PE in patients with APS [314]. The protective effects of heparin have been summarized in Figure 11.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been shown in various studies to reduce the NF-κB/sFlt-1 ratio and increase PlGF levels [315,326,327,328,329]. Multicenter trials involving high-risk populations, specifically those with a history of preeclampsia and autoimmunity, indicate that HCQ may decrease the incidence of PE [315,326,327,328,329]. In Figure 12, the effects of HCQ have been compared with those of statins since both drugs decrease antigen expression.
The use of statins in PE has had controversial results [330,331,332]. Although in principle, statins could decrease the inflammatory response by reducing inflammation, antigen expression, and immune cell activation [330], meta-analysis of clinical trials has shown no conclusive effects [331]. However, pravastatin appears to correct dysfunction in the uterine radial arteries ex vivo. Figure 12 compares the effect of both treatments; nevertheless, well-designed clinical trials are required to define whether HCQ treatment is appropriate in patients without autoimmune disease and whether statin therapy can be an adjunct therapy for PE patients.
Regulatory dendritic cells (DCregs) play a pivotal role in modulating the immune response by facilitating the conversion of T-helper cells from Th1 to Th2 phenotypes. This shift results in an increased IL-10-to-TGF-β ratio. Preclinical studies using Hmox1/ mice, a model of PE, have demonstrated that administering DCregs can prevent the onset of hypertension, proteinuria, and fetal loss [333]. Moreover, mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have been shown to immunomodulate uterine NK (uNK) and myeloid cells, elevating the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In a preclinical study using the Hmox1 model, MSC-EV administration normalized placental morphology and improved fetal growth [334].
Preclinical studies suggest that anti-TNF-α therapies (etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab) may help prevent PE and improve maternal blood pressure in certain models [335,336,337]. However, human data are limited, and these therapies have been associated with risks such as intrauterine growth restriction, spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth [338]. Notably, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, there seems to be a trend indicating a protective effect against PE [339].
C5aR antagonists help minimize C5a-induced trophoblast injury. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits C5, shows beneficial effects in PE [340,341,342,343,344]. Even though complement regulation is critical in PE, more studies are required to establish the benefits of the therapy and to compare it with lower-cost therapies that are likely to have a similar effect.
Other compounds have been analyzed in small trials; consequently, caution is warranted when interpreting those results [345]. Other therapies shown in Figure 10, mostly at the preclinical stage, focus on treating the placenta using nanopharmacology.
Recently, it has been proposed that heterogeneity in pharmacological responses may also be influenced by distinct patient subgroups. Variations in genetic background and the presence of hypertension prior to pregnancy may predispose individuals to different therapeutic responses [346]. The analysis of cell-free DNA may significantly aid in identifying specific patient subgroups in the early stages of PE, thereby optimizing the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments [347].

20. Future Perspectives

Future research directions necessitate the implementation of additional clinical trials aimed at achieving the following objectives: (1) to identify specific subclusters of patients diagnosed with preeclampsia (PE), (2) to establish effective therapeutic regimens, (3) to determine unique biomarkers indicative of PE risk and for monitoring purposes, (4) to conduct genetic analyses in women at high risk to identify potential associations, (5) to investigate the relationship between the risk of autoimmune disorders and the elevated risk of PE, (6) to evaluate whether pharmacological preventive therapies should be administered to reduce the incidence of PE among at-risk populations before conception, and (7) to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in women with hypertension to prevent superimposed PE.
Various immunological therapies are being investigated to enhance prevention and treatment strategies, with a focus on personalized approaches. Nanotherapeutics also represent a significant opportunity for future therapeutic interventions [348]. The development of placental-targeted therapies is gaining momentum, with validated biomarkers driving future progress. Figure 13 illustrates the new proposed therapies.
Figure 13. A schematic view of the proposed new placental therapies is depicted.
Figure 13. A schematic view of the proposed new placental therapies is depicted.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g013

21. Conclusions

From an immunological perspective, PE arises from a failure of maternal-fetal tolerance, characterized by inadequate spiral artery remodeling, elevated Th1/Th17 responses, decreased Tregs, NK cell dysfunction, M1 macrophage polarization, autoantibodies, increased oxidative response and protein modification, altered cell death, and an anti-angiogenic imbalance [10,11,12]. Dysbiosis of the microbiota, infections, hypertension, metabolic alterations, and autoimmunity increase the risk of preeclampsia through Th1 and dysbalanced cytokine pathways.
In addition to the clearly defined stages of PE, some researchers have suggested that these stages be further categorized into subgroups based on factors such as age, metabolic status (including high body mass index and various endocrine alterations), genetic predisposition, and prior hypertension. Notably, the immune response is a critical factor in all of these scenarios; consequently, alterations in immune response are anticipated across these conditions. Figure 14 summarizes the points discussed in the review.
Biomarkers are essential in the early identification of diseases and in assessing the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Integrated biomarkers, such as sFlt-1, galectins, and PlGF, have significant potential to enable early clinical interventions. Additionally, detecting oxidative products, oxidized lipids, nitrotyrosine, and S-modified proteins may further enhance the utility of these integrated biomarkers. However, there are no clear universal guidelines. Further research is required to validate various candidate biomarkers, as they are crucial for determining treatment responses and monitoring disease progression.
The therapeutic management of PE is an area of ongoing development; however, the rising incidence has intensified the urgency to establish consensus on effective interventions. Evidence indicates that low-dose aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin are effective in preventing PE among high-risk patients. HCQ has shown potential as a preventive measure for PE in individuals with pre-existing autoimmune disorders. Conversely, certain therapies, such as anti-TNF agents or cellular therapies, appear to be less favorable than targeted pharmacological treatments. Future therapies that combine nanotechnology and placental therapy are gaining attention, although their scope may be limited. In summary, further research is imperative on the pathophysiology and treatment of preeclampsia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.V.G. and H.A.; methodology, J.V.G., H.A. and J.B.D.S.; validation, J.V.G., H.A., A.H.G. and J.B.D.S.; formal analysis, J.V.G., H.A. and J.B.D.S.; investigation, J.V.G., H.A. and J.B.D.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.V.G., H.A., A.H.G. and J.B.D.S.; writing—review and editing, J.V.G., H.A., A.H.G. and J.B.D.S.; project administration, J.B.D.S.; funding acquisition, J.B.D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

JBDS was partially financed by the National Institute of Virology and Bacteriology [Program EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5103]—Funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU from the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic (MEYS).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, e237–e260. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Braunthal, S.; Brateanu, A. Hypertension in pregnancy: Pathophysiology and treatment. SAGE Open Med. 2019, 7, 2050312119843700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ryan, K.; McGrath, L.; Brookfield, K. Hypertension Management in Pregnancy. Annu. Rev. Med. 2025, 76, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harmon, A.C.; Cornelius, D.C.; Amaral, L.M.; Faulkner, J.L.; Cunningham, M.W., Jr.; Wallace, K.; LaMarca, B. The role of inflammation in the pathology of preeclampsia. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Borzychowski, A.M.; Sargent, I.L.; Redman, C.W. Inflammation and pre-eclampsia. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006, 11, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Blakey, H.; Sun, R.; Xie, L.; Russell, R.; Sarween, N.; Hodson, J.; Hargitai, B.; Marton, T.; Neil, D.A.H.; Wong, E.; et al. Pre-eclampsia is associated with complement pathway activation in the maternal and fetal circulation and placental tissue. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2023, 32, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Burwick, R.M.; Java, A.; Regal, J.F. The role of complement in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1643896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Burwick, R.M.; Feinberg, B.B. Complement activation and regulation in preeclampsia and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 226, S1059–S1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Canzoneri, B.J.; Lewis, D.F.; Groome, L.; Wang, Y. Increased neutrophil numbers account for leukocytosis in women with preeclampsia. Am. J. Perinatol. 2009, 26, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Giaglis, S.; Stoikou, M.; Grimolizzi, F.; Subramanian, B.Y.; van Breda, S.V.; Hoesli, I.; Lapaire, O.; Hasler, P.; Than, N.G.; Hahn, S. Neutrophil migration into the placenta: Good, bad or deadly? Cell Adhes. Migr. 2016, 10, 208–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Qin, Z.; Long, Y. Immunological dysregulation in preeclampsia: Pathogenesis and clinical implications. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 163, 115314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deer, E.; Herrock, O.; Campbell, N.; Cornelius, D.; Fitzgerald, S.; Amaral, L.M.; LaMarca, B. The role of immune cells and mediators in preeclampsia. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2023, 19, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ribatti, D. Endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis: A historical review. Leuk. Res. 2009, 33, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeisler, H.; Llurba, E.; Chantraine, F.; Vatish, M.; Staff, A.C.; Sennström, M.; Olovsson, M.; Brennecke, S.P.; Stepan, H.; Allegranza, D.; et al. Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rada, B. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1982, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hernández González, L.L.; Pérez-Campos Mayoral, L.; Hernández-Huerta, M.T.; Mayoral Andrade, G.; Martínez Cruz, M.; Ramos-Martínez, E. Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation: Exploring Promising Pharmacological Strategies for the Treatment of Preeclampsia. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kong, X.; Guo, Z.; Dong, J.; Hao, B.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Kang, S. Association of first-trimester peripheral blood count-derived immune markers with the risk of incident hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study. Hypertens. Res. 2026, 49, 1182–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gelaw, Y.; Asrie, F.; Walle, M.; Getaneh, Z. The value of eosinophil count in the diagnosis of preeclampsia among pregnant women attending the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chavez, B.; Kiaris, H. Insights on the role of the chemokine CCL8 in pathology. Cell. Signal. 2025, 134, 111951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Purcell, W.M. Human placental mast cells: A role in pre-eclampsia? Med. Hypotheses 1992, 39, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Y.; Gu, Y.; Lewis, D.F.; Alexander, J.S.; Granger, D.N. Elevated plasma chymotrypsin-like protease (chymase) activity in women with preeclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2010, 29, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Faas, M.M.; De Vos, P. Innate immune cells in the placental bed in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia. Placenta 2018, 69, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Derbala, Y.; Elazzamy, H.; Bilal, M.; Reed, R.; Salazar Garcia, M.D.; Skariah, A.; Skariah, A.; Dambaeva, S.; Fernandez, E.; Germain, A.; et al. Mast cell-induced immunopathology in recurrent pregnancy losses. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 82, e13128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Elieh Ali Komi, D.; Shafaghat, F.; Haidl, G. Significance of mast cells in spermatogenesis, implantation, pregnancy, and abortion: Cross talk and molecular mechanisms. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 83, e13228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Staff, A.C.; Fjeldstad, H.E.; Fosheim, I.K.; Moe, K.; Turowski, G.; Johnsen, G.M.; Alnaes-Katjavivi, P.; Alnaes-Katjavivi, P.; Sugulle, M. Failure of physiological transformation and spiral artery atherosis: Their roles in preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 226, S895–S906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Broekhuizen, M.; Hitzerd, E.; van den Bosch, T.P.P.; Dumas, J.; Verdijk, R.M.; van Rijn, B.B.; Danser, A.H.J.; van Eijck, C.H.J.; Reiss, I.K.M.; Mustafa, D.A.M. The Placental Innate Immune System Is Altered in Early-Onset Preeclampsia, but Not in Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 780043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kumaraswami, S.; Farkas, G. Management of a Parturient with Mast Cell Activation Syndrome: An Anesthesiologist’s Experience. Case Rep. Anesthesiol. 2018, 2018, 8920921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rudra, C.B.; Williams, M.A.; Frederick, I.O.; Luthy, D.A. Maternal asthma and risk of preeclampsia: A case-control study. J. Reprod. Med. 2006, 51, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Mirzakhani, H.; Carey, V.J.; McElrath, T.F.; Laranjo, N.; O’Connor, G.; Iverson, R.E.; Lee-Parritz, A.; Strunk, R.C.; Bacharier, L.B.; Macones, G.A.; et al. The Association of Maternal Asthma and Early Pregnancy Vitamin D with Risk of Preeclampsia: An Observation From Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2018, 6, 600–608.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dash, S.P.; Gupta, S.; Sarangi, P.P. Monocytes and macrophages: Origin, homing, differentiation, and functionality during inflammation. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bezemer, R.E.; Faas, M.M.; van Goor, H.; Gordijn, S.J.; Prins, J.R. Decidual macrophages and Hofbauer cells in fetal growth restriction. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1379537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mercnik, M.H.; Schliefsteiner, C.; Fluhr, H.; Wadsack, C. Placental macrophages present distinct polarization pattern and effector functions depending on clinical onset of preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2023, 13, 1095879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wei, Y.; Su, Y.; Liu, C.; Ma, X.; Ling, Z.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, R. Macrophage and Preeclampsia: Macrophage Polarization Imbalance at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2025, 39, e70046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wei, R.; Lai, N.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Guo, Q.; Chu, C.; Fu, X.; Li, X. Dendritic cells in pregnancy and pregnancy-associated diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 110921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Miller, D.; Motomura, K.; Galaz, J.; Gershater, M.; Lee, E.D.; Romero, R.; Gomez-Lopez, N. Cellular immune responses in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022, 111, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wei, X.; Yang, X. The central role of natural killer cells in preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1009867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Köstlin-Gille, N.; Gille, C. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Pregnancy and the Neonatal Period. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 584712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sundararajan, A.; Vora, K.; Natesan, S. Assessment of Quantitative and Functional Aspects of Dendritic Cell Subsets in Early Onset Pre-Eclampsia Patients. ARJGO 2021, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shu, C.; Wan, J.; Shan, Y.; Zhi, X.; Sun, L.; Yi, H.; Yang, Y.G.; He, J. Inhibition of pregnancy-associated granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion and arginase-1 production in preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 127, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dong, S.; Shah, N.K.; He, J.; Han, S.; Xie, M.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, T.; Liu, Z.; Shu, C. The abnormal expression of Tim-3 is involved in the regulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and its correlation with preeclampsia. Placenta 2021, 114, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mace, E.M. Human natural killer cells: Form, function, and development. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2023, 151, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, S.; Zhu, H.; Jounaidi, Y. Comprehensive snapshots of natural killer cells functions, signaling, molecular mechanisms and clinical utilization. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Faas, M.M.; de Vos, P. Uterine NK cells and macrophages in pregnancy. Placenta 2017, 56, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Garmendia, J.V.; De Sanctis, J.B. A Brief Analysis of Tissue-Resident NK Cells in Pregnancy and Endometrial Diseases: The Importance of Pharmacologic Modulation. Immuno 2021, 1, 174–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garmendia, J.V.; De Sanctis, C.V.; Hajdúch, M.; De Sanctis, J.B. Exploring the Immunological Aspects and Treatments of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Q.; Sharkey, A.; Sheridan, M.; Magistrati, E.; Arutyunyan, A.; Huhn, O.; Sancho-Serra, C.; Anderson, H.; McGovern, N.; Esposito, L.; et al. Human uterine natural killer cells regulate differentiation of extravillous trophoblast early in pregnancy. Cell Stem Cell 2024, 31, 181–195.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Borzychowski, A.M.; Croy, B.A.; Chan, W.L.; Redman, C.W.; Sargent, I.L. Changes in systemic type 1 and type 2 immunity in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia may be mediated by natural killer cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 3054–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sabetkam, S.; Rafat, A.; Mazloumi, Z.; Kalarestaghi, H.; Bahramloo, M.; Naderali, E.; Asl, K.D. Role of uterine NK cells in pregnancy complication. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2025, 270, 155998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yue, S.; Meng, J. Role of Decidual Natural Killer Cells in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2025, 93, e70033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Williams, P.J.; Bulmer, J.N.; Searle, R.F.; Innes, B.A.; Robson, S.C. Altered decidual leucocyte populations in the placental bed in pre-eclampsia and foetal growth restriction: A comparison with late normal pregnancy. Reproduction 2009, 138, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Rieger, L.; Segerer, S.; Bernar, T.; Kapp, M.; Majic, M.; Morr, A.K.; Kämmerer, U. Specific subsets of immune cells in human decidua differ between normal pregnancy and preeclampsia--a prospective observational study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2009, 7, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lockwood, C.J.; Huang, S.J.; Chen, C.P.; Huang, Y.; Xu, J.; Faramarzi, S.; Kayisli, O.; Kayisli, U.; Koopman, L.; Smedts, D.; et al. Decidual cell regulation of natural killer cell-recruiting chemokines: Implications for the pathogenesis and prediction of preeclampsia. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 183, 841–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Miko, E.; Barakonyi, A.; Meggyes, M.; Szereday, L. The Role of Type I and Type II NKT Cells in Materno-Fetal Immunity. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chojnacka-Purpurowicz, J.; Owczarczyk-Saczonek, A.; Nedoszytko, B. The Role of Gamma Delta T Lymphocytes in Physiological and Pathological Condition-Focus on Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis, Autoimmune Disorders, Cancer and Lymphomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hashemi, V.; Dolati, S.; Hosseini, A.; Gharibi, T.; Danaii, S.; Yousefi, M. Natural killer T cells in Preeclampsia: An updated review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 95, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miko, E.; Szereday, L.; Barakonyi, A.; Jarkovich, A.; Varga, P.; Szekeres-Bartho, J. Immunoactivation in preeclampsia: Vdelta2+ and regulatory T cells during the inflammatory stage of disease. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2009, 80, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xu, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.L.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, Y.J.; Muyayalo, K.P.; Liao, A.H. Roles of γδT cells in pregnancy and pregnancy-related complications. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2021, 86, e13487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lissauer, D.; Kilby, M.D.; Moss, P. Maternal effector T cells within decidua: The adaptive immune response to pregnancy? Placenta 2017, 60, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Peng, X.; Chinwe Oluchi-Amaka, I.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Yang, X. A comprehensive review of the roles of T-cell immunity in preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1476123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Robertson, S.A.; Green, E.S.; Care, A.S.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Prins, J.R.; Hull, M.L.; Barry, S.C.; Dekker, G. Therapeutic Potential of Regulatory T Cells in Preeclampsia—Opportunities and Challenges. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Saito, S.; Tsuda, S.; Nakashima, A. T cell immunity and the etiology and pathogenesis of preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2023, 159, 104125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, W.; Sung, N.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Kwak-Kim, J. T Helper (Th) Cell Profiles in Pregnancy and Recurrent Pregnancy Losses: Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22/Tfh Cells. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Saito, S.; Sakai, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Tanebe, K.; Tsuda, H.; Michimata, T. Quantitative analysis of peripheral blood Th0, Th1, Th2 and the Th1:Th2 cell ratio during normal human pregnancy and preeclampsia. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1999, 117, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dos Santos Fagundes, I.; Brendler, E.P.; Nunes Erthal, I.; Eder Ribeiro, R.J.; Caron-Lienert, R.S.; Machado, D.C.; Pinheiro da Costa, B.E.; Poli-de-Figueiredo, C.E. Total Th1/Th2 cytokines profile from peripheral blood lymphocytes in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia syndrome. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2022, 41, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Waite, J.C.; Skokos, D. Th17 response and inflammatory autoimmune diseases. Int. J. Inflamm. 2012, 2012, 819467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. De Sanctis, J.B.; Garmendia, J.V.; Moreno, D.; Larocca, N.; Mijares, M.; Di Giulio, C.; Salazar-Bookaman, M.; Wojewodka, G.; Radzioch, D. Pharmacological modulation of Th17. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2009, 3, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nalbant, A. IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22 Cytokines of T Helper 17 Cells in Cancer. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2019, 39, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Walsh, S.W.; Nugent, W.H.; Archer, K.J.; Al Dulaimi, M.; Washington, S.L.; Strauss, J.F., 3rd. Epigenetic Regulation of Interleukin-17-Related Genes and Their Potential Roles in Neutrophil Vascular Infiltration in Preeclampsia. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 29, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zolfaghari, M.A.; Arefnezhad, R.; Parhizkar, F.; Hejazi, M.S.; Motavalli Khiavi, F.; Mahmoodpoor, A.; Yousefi, M. T lymphocytes and preeclampsia: The potential role of T-cell subsets and related MicroRNAs in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2021, 86, e13475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Stefańska, K.; Zieliński, M.; Jankowiak, M.; Zamkowska, D.; Sakowska, J.; Adamski, P.; Piekarska, K.; Leszczyńska, K.; Świątkowska-Stodulska, R.; Kwiatkowski, S.; et al. Cytokine Imprint in Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 667841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Garmendia, J.V.; Blanca, I.; Peña, M.J.; De Sanctis, C.V.; De Sanctis, J.B. Unlocking the Puzzle: Investigating the Role of Interleukin 17 Genetic Polymorphisms, Circulating Lymphocytes, and Serum Levels in Venezuelan Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Immuno 2024, 4, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Eyerich, S.; Eyerich, K.; Pennino, D.; Carbone, T.; Nasorri, F.; Pallotta, S.; Cianfarani, F.; Odorisio, T.; Traidl- Hoffmann, C.; Behrendt, H.; et al. Th22 cells represent a distinct human T cell subset involved in epidermal immunity and remodeling. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 3573–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wang, L.; Liang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Ma, P.; Zeng, S.; Ju, D.; Zhao, M.; Yu, M.; Shi, Y. Regulatory T cells in homeostasis and disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025, 10, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nevers, T.; Kalkunte, S.; Sharma, S. Uterine Regulatory T cells, IL-10 and hypertension. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 66, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, Z.; Si, P.; Meng, T.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, D.; Meng, S.; Li, N.; Liu, R.; Ni, T.; et al. CCR8+ decidual regulatory T cells maintain maternal-fetal immune tolerance during early pregnancy. Sci. Immunol. 2025, 10, eado2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sava, R.I.; March, K.L.; Pepine, C.J. Hypertension in pregnancy: Taking cues from pathophysiology for clinical practice. Clin. Cardiol. 2018, 41, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sasaki, Y.; Darmochwal-Kolarz, D.; Suzuki, D.; Sakai, M.; Ito, M.; Shima, T.; Shiozaki, A.; Rolinski, J.; Saito, S. Proportion of peripheral blood and decidual CD4(+) CD25(bright) regulatory T cells in pre-eclampsia. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2007, 149, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Palei, A.C.; Spradley, F.T.; Warrington, J.P.; George, E.M.; Granger, J.P. Pathophysiology of hypertension in pre-eclampsia: A lesson in integrative physiology. Acta Physiol. 2013, 208, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rahimzadeh, M.; Norouzian, M.; Arabpour, F.; Naderi, N. Regulatory T-cells and preeclampsia: An overview of literature. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2016, 12, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Gomez-Lopez, N.; Kareus, E.; Lee, S. Immune cellular homeostasis and its breakdown at the maternal-fetal interface. Trends Immunol. 2026, 47, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Liu, J.C.; Zeng, Q.; Duan, Y.G.; Yeung, W.S.B.; Li, R.H.W.; Ng, E.H.Y.; Cheung, K.W.; Zhang, Q.; Chiu, P.C.N. B cells: Roles in physiology and pathology of pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1456171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Magatti, M.; Masserdotti, A.; Cargnoni, A.; Papait, A.; Stefani, F.R.; Silini, A.R.; Parolini, O. The Role of B Cells in PE Pathophysiology: A Potential Target for Perinatal Cell-Based Therapy? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Panova, I.A.; Kudryashova, A.V.; Panashchatenko, A.S.; Rokotyanskaya, E.A.; Malyshkina, A.I.; Parejshvili, V.V.; Harlamova, N.V. Character of β-lymphocytes differentiation in women with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Klin. Lab. Diagn. 2021, 66, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jensen, F.; Wallukat, G.; Herse, F.; Budner, O.; El-Mousleh, T.; Costa, S.D.; Dechend, R.; Zenclussen, A.C. CD19+CD5+ cells as indicators of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2012, 59, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nellore, A.; Killian, J.T., Jr.; Porrett, P.M. Memory B Cells in Pregnancy Sensitization. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 688987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chaiworapongsa, T.; Romero, R.; Gotsch, F.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Suksai, M.; Gallo, D.M.; Jung, E.; Levenson, D.; Tarca, A.L. One-third of patients with eclampsia at term do not have an abnormal angiogenic profile. J. Perinat. Med. 2022, 51, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chaiworapongsa, T.; Romero, R.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Suksai, M.; Gallo, D.M.; Jung, E.; Berry, S.M.; Awonuga, A.; Tarca, A.L.; Bryant, D.R. Preeclampsia at term: Evidence of disease heterogeneity based on the profile of circulating cytokines and angiogenic factors. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024, 230, 450 e1–450 e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Hariharan, N.; Shoemaker, A.; Wagner, S. Pathophysiology of hypertension in preeclampsia. Microvasc. Res. 2017, 109, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Matsubara, K.; Higaki, T.; Matsubara, Y.; Nawa, A. Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 4600–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Buhimschi, I.A.; Saade, G.R.; Chwalisz, K.; Garfield, R.E. The nitric oxide pathway in pre-eclampsia: Pathophysiological implications. Hum. Reprod. Update 1998, 4, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kutllovci Hasani, K.; Ajeti, N.; Goswami, N. Understanding Preeclampsia: Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, Histopathological Insights and Molecular Biomarkers. Med. Sci. 2025, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Maynard, S.E.; Karumanchi, S.A. Angiogenic factors and preeclampsia. Semin. Nephrol. 2011, 31, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jim, B.; Karumanchi, S.A. Preeclampsia: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Long-Term Complications. Semin. Nephrol. 2017, 37, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Venkatesha, S.; Toporsian, M.; Lam, C.; Hanai, J.; Mammoto, T.; Kim, Y.M. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Youssef, L.; Crispi, F.; Paolucci, S.; Miranda, J.; Lobmaier, S.; Crovetto, F.; Figueras, F.; Gratacos, E. Angiogenic factors alone or in combination with ultrasound Doppler criteria for risk classification among late-onset small fetuses with or without pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2025, 65, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mula, R.; Prats, P.; García, S.; Serra, B.; Scazzocchio, E.; Meler, E. Angiogenic factors assessment in pre-eclampsia high-risk population for the prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates: A prospective longitudinal study. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023, 161, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hackelöer, M.; Schmidt, L.; Verlohren, S. New advances in prediction and surveillance of preeclampsia: Role of machine learning approaches and remote monitoring. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023, 308, 1663–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Blois, S.M.; Barrientos, G. Galectin signature in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 101–102, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jovanović Krivokuća, M.; Vilotić, A.; Nacka-Aleksić, M.; Pirković, A.; Ćujić, D.; Legner, J.; Dekanski, D.; Bojić-Trbojević, Ž. Galectins in Early Pregnancy and Pregnancy-Associated Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Karadzov Orlic, N.; Joksić, I. Preeclampsia pathogenesis and prediction—Where are we now: The focus on the role of galectins and miRNAs. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2025, 44, 2470626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Kandel, M.; Tong, S.; Walker, S.P.; Cannon, P.; Nguyen, T.V.; MacDonald, T.M.; Hannan, N.J.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.J.; Bartho, L.A. Placental galectin-3 is reduced in early-onset preeclampsia. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1037597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Li, Y.; Sang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Xu, C.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chiu, P.C.N.; Yeung, W.S.B.; Zhou, H.; Dong, N.; et al. A Galectin-9-Driven CD11chigh Decidual Macrophage Subset Suppresses Uterine Vascular Remodeling in Preeclampsia. Circulation 2024, 149, 1670–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Aisagbonhi, O.; Morris, G.P. Human Leukocyte Antigens in Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 884275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pishesha, N.; Harmand, T.J.; Ploegh, H.L. A guide to antigen processing and presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Triche, E.W.; Harland, K.K.; Field, E.H.; Rubenstein, L.M.; Saftlas, A.F. Maternal-fetal HLA sharing and preeclampsia: Variation in effects by seminal fluid exposure in a case-control study of nulliparous women in Iowa. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 101–102, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Van’t Hof, L.J.; Schotvanger, N.; Haasnoot, G.W.; van der Keur, C.; Roelen, D.L.; Lashley, L.E.E.L.O.; Claas, F.H.J.; Eikmans, M.; van der Hoorn, M.P. Maternal-Fetal HLA Compatibility in Uncomplicated and Preeclamptic Naturally Conceived Pregnancies. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 673131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. van Bentem, K.; Bos, M.; van der Keur, C.; Brand-Schaaf, S.H.; Haasnoot, G.W.; Roelen, D.L.; Eikmans, M.; Heidt, S.; Claas, F.H.J.; Lashley, E.E.L.O.; et al. The development of preeclampsia in oocyte donation pregnancies is related to the number of fetal-maternal HLA class II mismatches. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 137, 103074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Emmery, J.; Hachmon, R.; Pyo, C.W.; Nelson, W.C.; Geraghty, D.E.; Andersen, A.M.; Melbye, M.; Hviid, T.V. Maternal and fetal human leukocyte antigen class Ia and II alleles in severe preeclampsia and eclampsia. Genes Immun. 2016, 17, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Chaaithanya, I.K.; Rajalingam, R. Emerging roles of natural killer cell ligands-HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, MICA, and MICB-in in vitro fertilization outcomes. Front. Genet. 2025, 16, 1661511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Møller, H.I.; Christiansen, C.M.; Klok, F.R.; Pedersen, N.H.; Blauenfeldt, T.; Finne, K.F.; Nielsen, H.S.; Hviid, T.V.F. Investigations of HLA-F and HLA-G 3′UTR Polymorphisms in Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction Indicate a Possible Role of HLA-F-HLA-G Haplotypes and Diplotypes. HLA 2025, 106, e70293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tang, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Peng, T.; Gu, W.; Li, X. Hypermethylation of the HLA-G promoter is associated with preeclampsia. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 21, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Pabalan, N.; Jarjanazi, H.; Sun, C.; Iversen, A.C. Meta-analysis of the human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) 14 bp insertion/deletion polymorphism as a risk factor for preeclampsia. Tissue Antigens 2015, 86, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lee, J.; Romero, R.; Xu, Y.; Miranda, J.; Yoo, W.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Tarca, A.L.; Korzeniewski, S.J.; et al. Detection of anti-HLA antibodies in maternal blood in the second trimester to identify patients at risk of antibody-mediated maternal anti-fetal rejection and spontaneous preterm delivery. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 70, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Moffett, A.; Colucci, F. Co-evolution of NK receptors and HLA ligands in humans is driven by reproduction. Immunol. Rev. 2015, 267, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hiby, S.E.; Walker, J.J.; O’shaughnessy, K.M.; Redman, C.W.; Carrington, M.; Trowsdale, J.; Moffett, A. Combinations of maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C genes influence the risk of preeclampsia and reproductive success. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Larsen, T.G.; Hackmon, R.; Geraghty, D.E.; Hviid, T.V.F. Fetal human leukocyte antigen-C and maternal killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors in cases of severe preeclampsia. Placenta 2019, 75, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Vinnars, M.T.; Björk, E.; Nagaev, I.; Ottander, U.; Bremme, K.; Holmlund, U.; Sverremark-Ekström, E.; Mincheva-Nilsson, L. Enhanced Th1 and inflammatory mRNA responses upregulate NK cell cytotoxicity and NKG2D ligand expression in human pre-eclamptic placenta and target it for NK cell attack. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e12969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Taefehshokr, N.; Baradaran, B.; Baghbanzadeh, A.; Taefehshokr, S. Promising approaches in cancer immunotherapy. Immunobiology 2020, 225, 151875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Du, X.; Liu, H.; Shi, J.; Yang, P.; Gu, Y.; Meng, J. The PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway regulates decidual macrophage polarization and may participate in preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 164, 104258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Tian, Y.; Peng, X.; Yang, X. Decreased PD-L1 contributes to preeclampsia by suppressing GM-CSF via the JAK2/STAT5 signal pathway. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Parhizkar, F.; Shekari, N.; HajiEsmailPoor, Z.; Parsania, S.; Soltani-Zangbar, M.S.; Aghebati-Maleki, A.; Aghebati-Maleki, L. Investigation of immune checkpoint molecules (CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, Tim-3) expressions in preeclampsia: A comparative study of membranous and soluble forms. Hum. Immunol. 2025, 86, 111298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Liu, J.; Song, G.; Zhao, G.; Meng, T. Gene polymorphism associated with FOXP3, CTLA-4 and susceptibility to pre-eclampsia: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022, 42, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kandel, S.; Adhikary, P.; Li, G.; Cheng, K. The TIM3/Gal9 signaling pathway: An emerging target for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2021, 510, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Mittelberger, J.; Seefried, M.; Löb, S.; Kuhn, C.; Franitza, M.; Garrido, F.; Ditsch, N.; Jeschke, U.; Dannecker, C. The expression of TIM-3 and Gal-9 on macrophages and Hofbauer cells in the placenta of preeclampsia patients. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 164, 104296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Doyle, L.M.; Wang, M.Z. Overview of Extracellular Vesicles, Their Origin, Composition, Purpose, and Methods for Exosome Isolation and Analysis. Cells 2019, 8, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Fato, B.R.; de Alwis, N.; Hannan, N.J. Exploring placental dysfunction: Models of extracellular vesicle action in preeclampsia. Reproduction 2026, 171, xaag011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Cheng, S.B.; Nakashima, A.; Huber, W.J.; Davis, S.; Banerjee, S.; Huang, Z.; Saito, S.; Sadovsky, Y.; Sharma, S. Pyroptosis is a critical inflammatory pathway in the placenta from early onset preeclampsia and in human trophoblasts exposed to hypoxia and endoplasmic reticulum stressors. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Schuster, J.; Cheng, S.B.; Padbury, J.; Sharma, S. Placental extracellular vesicles and pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2021, 85, e13297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sun, Q.; Chang, H.; Wang, H.; Zheng, L.; Wenig, Y.; Zheng, D.; Zheng, D. Regulatory roles of extracellular vesicles in pregnancy complications. J. Adv. Res. 2025, 78, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Ramos, A.; Youssef, L.; Molina, P.; Torramadé-Moix, S.; Martinez-Sanchez, J.; Moreno-Castaño, A.B.; Blasco, M.; Guillén-Olmos, E.; De Moner, B.; Pino, M. Circulating extracellular vesicles and neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1488127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Pham, Q.N.; Milanova, V.; Tung, T.T.; Losic, D.; Thierry, B.; Winter, M.A. Affinity enrichment of placental extracellular vesicles from minimally processed maternal plasma with magnetic nanowires. Analyst 2025, 150, 1908–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Hula , H.; Escalera, D.; Goulopoulou, S. Extracellular vesicles in preeclampsia: Drivers of vascular dysfunction and inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2025, 329, H1560–H1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Fitzgerald, W.; Gudicha, D.W.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Posta, M.; Zhou, F.; Bhatti, G.; Meyyazhagan, A.; Awonuga, A.O. Proteomic Profiles of Maternal Plasma Extracellular Vesicles for Prediction of Preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 92, e13928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Chen, H.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Lu, K.M.; Yu, C.H.; Su, M.T.; Kang, L.; Hsu, K.F.; Chen, P.F.; Lin, S.H. Maternal Th17/Treg Cytokines and Small Extracellular Vesicles in Plasma as Potential Biomarkers for Preeclampsia. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 19, 1672–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Giannubilo, S.R.; Cecati, M.; Marzioni, D.; Ciavattini, A. Circulating miRNAs and Preeclampsia: From Implantation to Epigenetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Boelig, R.C.; Tawk, A.; Zhan, T.; Kraft, W.K.; McKenzie, S.E.; Michael, J. Platelet-Associated microRNAs as Markers of Aspirin Response and Pregnancy Outcome in Pregnancies at High-Risk for Preeclampsia. Am. J. Perinatol. 2026, 43, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Jaszczuk, I.; Koczkodaj, D.; Kondracka, A.; Kwaśniewska, A.; Winkler, I.; Filip, A. The role of miRNA-210 in pre-eclampsia development. Ann. Med. 2022, 54, 1350–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Han, L.; Luo, Q.Q.; Peng, M.G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, X.H. miR-483 is downregulated in pre-eclampsia via targeting insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and regulates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway of endothelial progenitor cells. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2021, 47, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Lopes, A.C.S.; Macedo, A.A.; Mendes, F.S.; Costa, I.M.; Dusse, L.M.S.; Alpoim, P.N. Changes in microRNA expression associated with preeclampsia: A systematic review. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2025, 58, e13988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Gerede, A.; Stavros, S.; Danavasi, M.; Potiris, A.; Moustakli, E.; Machairiotis, N.; Zikopoulos, A.; Nikolettos, K.; Drakakis, P.; Nikolettos, N.; et al. MicroRNAs in Preeclampsia: Bridging Diagnosis and Treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Grezzana, G.B.; Stein, A.T.; Markoski, M.M. Towards early diagnosis of Preeclampsia: Emerging roles of circulating microRNAs. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2026, 316, 114822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Conrad, K.P.; Miles, T.M.; Benyo, D.F. Circulating levels of immunoreactive cytokines in women with preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1998, 40, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Kurmanova, A.; Urazbayeva, G.; Kayupova, L.; Salimbaeva, D.; Dzhardemalieva, N. Dynamics of serum cytokines in preeclampsia. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2024, 35, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Vilotić, A.; Nacka-Aleksić, M.; Pirković, A.; Bojić-Trbojević, Ž.; Dekanski, D.; Jovanović Krivokuća, M. IL-6 and IL-8: An Overview of Their Roles in Healthy and Pathological Pregnancies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Xue, X.; Guo, C.; Fan, C.; Lei, D. The causal role of circulating immunity-inflammation in preeclampsia: A Mendelian randomisation. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2024, 26, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Raghupathy, R. Cytokines as key players in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Med. Princ. Pract. 2013, 22, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wang, X.; Shields, C.A.; Thompson, D.; McKay, J.; Wilson, R.; Robbins, M.K.; Glenn, H.; Fontenot, M.; Williams, J.M.; Cornelius, D.C. IL-33 Signaling Inhibition Leads to a Preeclampsia-Like Phenotype in Pregnant Rats. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 92, e13895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Patel, D.; Yulia, A. Placental growth factor testing for pre-eclampsia. Case Rep. Womens Health 2022, 33, e00387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Mise, H.; Sagawa, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Yura, S.; Nanno, H.; Itoh, H.; Mori, T.; Masuzaki, H.; Hosoda, K.; Ogawa, Y.; et al. Augmented placental production of leptin in preeclampsia: Possible involvement of placental hypoxia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 83, 3225–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Salimi, S.; Mohammadoo-Khorasani, M.; Yaghmaei, M.; Mokhtari, M.; Moossavi, M. Possible association of IL-4 VNTR polymorphism with susceptibility to preeclampsia. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 497031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Lang, X.; Liu, W.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, W.; Yang, X.; Chen, L.; Yan, Q.; Cheng, W. IL-17A polymorphism (rs2275913) and levels are associated with preeclampsia pathogenesis in Chinese patients. BMC Med. Genom. 2021, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Martínez-Abundis, E.; González-Ortiz, M.; Pascoe-González, S. Serum leptin levels and the severity of preeclampsia. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2000, 264, 71–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Anato, V.; Garmendia, J.V.; Bianco, N.E.; De Sanctis, J.B. Serum leptin levels in different types of hypertension during pregnancy. Res. Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol. 2000, 108, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  155. Pérez-Pérez, A.; Toro, A.; Vilariño-García, T.; Maymó, J.; Guadix, P.; Dueñas, J.L.; Fernández-Sánchez, M.; Varone, C.; Sánchez-Margalet, V. Leptin action in normal and pathological pregnancies. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 716–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Veiga, E.C.A.; Korkes, H.A.; Salomão, K.B.; Cavalli, R.C. Association of LEPTIN and other inflammatory markers with preeclampsia: A systematic review. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 966400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Elgazzaz, M.; Brawley, A.; Moronge, D.; Faulkner, J.L. Emerging Role of Leptin in Vascular and Placental Dysfunction in Preeclampsia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2025, 45, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Anato, V.; Garmendia, J.V.; Bianco, N.E.; De Sanctis, J.B. Antihypertensive treatment decreased serum leptin levels in severe preeclampsia during pregnancy. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2001, 45, 190–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Peltokorpi, A.; Irina, L.; Liisa, V.; Risto, K. Preconceptual leptin levels in gestational diabetes and hypertensive pregnancy. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2022, 41, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Parveen, N.; Iqbal, N.; Mohamed, A.A.A.; Shahid, S.M.A.; Abdalla, R.A.H.; Elhussein, G.E.M.O.; Saleem, M.; Choudhry, A.A.; Khan, M.S. First-trimester adipocytokine levels as predictive biomarkers for preeclampsia: A prospective case-control study. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2026, 31, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Reyna, E.; Mejia, J.; Reyna, N.; Torres, D.; Santos, J.; Perozo, J. Concentraciones de interleucina 1 beta en pacientes con preeclampsia y embarazadas normotensas sanas. Clínica E Investig. EN Ginecol. Y Obstet. 2011, 38, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Reyna Villasmil, E.; Mejia Montilla, J.; Reyna Villasmil, N.; Torres Cepeda, D.; Santos Bolívar, J.; Perozo Romero, J. Concentraciones de interleucina-2 en pacientes con preeclampsia a término y pretérmino. Rev. Chil. Obstet. Ginecol. 2010, 75, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Eghbal-Fard, S.; Yousefi, M.; Heydarlou, H.; Ahmadi, M.; Taghavi, S.; Movasaghpour, A.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Yousefi, B.; Dolati, S.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; et al. The imbalance of Th17/Treg axis involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 5106–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Fouda, M.E.; Mohamed, M.A.; El-Shimi, O.S.; Khashaba, R.A.; Abou Zeid, O.M. Assessment of Serum Level of IL-27 in Pregnancies Complicated by Preeclampsia. Benha J. Appl. Sci. (BJAS) 2020, 5, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wang, M. The Role of IL-37 and IL-38 in Obstetrics Abnormalities. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 737084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Friedman, S.A. Preeclampsia: A review of the role of prostaglandins. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988, 71, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  167. Walsh, S.W. Eicosanoids in preeclampsia. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2004, 70, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Guzeltas, G.; Ibanoglu, M.C.; Engin-Üstün, Y. Cysteinyl Leukotriene and Systemic Inflammatory Levels in Preeclampsia. Cureus 2023, 15, e37764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Demers, L.M.; Gabbe, S.G. Placental prostaglandin levels in pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976, 126, 137–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Moodley, J.; Norman, R.J.; Reddi, K. Central venous concentrations of immunoreactive prostaglandins E, F, and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 in eclampsia. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1984, 288, 1487–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Walsh, S.W.; Reep, D.T.; Alam, S.M.K.; Washington, S.L.; Al Dulaimi, M.; Lee, S.M.; Springel, E.H.; Strauss, J.F., 3rd; Stephenson, D.J.; Chalfant, C.E. Placental Production of Eicosanoids and Sphingolipids in Women Who Developed Preeclampsia on Low-Dose Aspirin. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 2158–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Serhan, C.N.; Hong, S.; Gronert, K.; Colgan, S.P.; Devchand, P.R.; Mirick, G.; Moussignac, R.-L. Resolvins: A family of bioactive products of omega-3 fatty acid transformation circuits initiated by aspirin treatment that counter proinflammation signals. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 196, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Sousa, L.G.; Correia-da-Silva, G.; Teixeira, N.; Fonseca, B.M. Specialized pro-resolving mediators: Key regulators in placental function and pregnancy complications. J. Mol. Med. 2025, 103, 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Oliveira Perucci, L.; Pereira Santos, T.A.; Campi Santos, P.; Ribeiro Teixeira, L.C.; Nessralla Alpoim, P.; Braga Gomes, K.; Sousa, L.P.; Dusse, L.M.S.; Talvani, A. Pre-eclampsia is associated with reduced resolvin D1 and maresin 1 to leukotriene B4 ratios in the plasma. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 83, e13206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Perucci, L.O.; de Castro Pinto, K.M.; da Silva, S.P.G.; Lage, E.M.; Teixeir, P.G.; Barbosa, A.S.; Alpoim, P.N.; de Sousa, L.P.; Talvani, A.; Dusse, L.M.S. Longitudinal assessment of leukotriene B4, lipoxin A4, and resolvin D1 plasma levels in pregnant women with risk factors for preeclampsia. Clin. Biochem. 2021, 98, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Farhat, S.; Zafar, M.U.; Sheikh, M.A.; Qasim, C.M.; Urooj, F.; Fatima, S.S. Association of resolvin level in pregnant women with preeclampsia and metabolic syndrome. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 59, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Parapob, N.; Luewan, S.; Kamlungkuea, T.; Tongsong, T. Oxidative Stress in Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia: Mechanistic and Clinical Insights. Antioxidants 2026, 15, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Voros, C.; Stavros, S.; Sapantzoglou, I.; Mavrogianni, D.; Daskalaki, M.A.; Theodora, M.; Antsaklis, P.; Drakakis, P.; Loutradis, D.; Daskalakis, G. The Role of Placental Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hansson, S.R.; Nääv, Å.; Erlandsson, L. Oxidative stress in preeclampsia and the role of free fetal hemoglobin. Front. Physiol. 2015, 5, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Aouache, R.; Biquard, L.; Vaiman, D.; Miralles, F. Oxidative Stress in Preeclampsia and Placental Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Assani, A.D.; Boldeanu, L.; Siloși, I.; Boldeanu, M.V.; Dijmărescu, A.L.; Assani, M.Z.; Manolea, M.M.; Văduva, C.C. Pregnancy Under Pressure: Oxidative Stress as a Common Thread in Maternal Disorders. Life 2025, 15, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Karaşin, S.S.; Çift, T. The Role of Ischemia-modified Albumin as a Biomarker in Preeclampsia. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2020, 42, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Arias-Sánchez, C.; Pérez-Olmos, A.; Reverte, V.; Hernández, I.; Cuevas, S.; Llinás, M.T. Uric Acid and Preeclampsia: Pathophysiological Interactions and the Emerging Role of Inflammasome Activation. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. You, K.; Tong, Y.; Sun, T.; Wang, D.; Liu, Q.; Xu, X. HIF-1α mediated placental ischemic signaling in the development of early-onset preeclampsia. Redox Biol. 2026, 92, 104110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Ibrahim, A.; Engku Ismail, E.H.; Irwan Khoo, M.; Yusuf, L.; Nik Hussain, N.H.; Mat Zin, A.A.; Noordin, L.; Abdullah, S.; Mahdy, Z.A.; Nik Lah, N.A.Z. Impaired implantation as a major upstream pathway of preeclampsia: A narrative synthesis of mechanistic, epidemiological and biomarker evidence. Front. Reprod. Health 2026, 7, 1743504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Afrose, D.; Alfonso-Sánchez, S.; McClements, L. Targeting oxidative stress in preeclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2025, 44, 2445556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Afrose, D.; Johansen, M.D.; Nikolic, V.; Karadzov Orlic, N.; Mikovic, Z.; Stefanovic, M.; Cakic, Z.; Hansbro, P.M.; McClements, L. Evaluating oxidative stress targeting treatments in in vitro models of placental stress relevant to preeclampsia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1539496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Barbouti, A.; Varvarousis, D.N.; Kanavaros, P. The Role of Oxidative Stress-Induced Senescence in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Furchgott, R.F.; Zawadzki, J.V. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 1980, 288, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Ignarro, L.J.; Byrns, R.E.; Buga, G.M.; Wood, K.S. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor from pulmonary artery and vein possesses pharmacologic and chemical properties identical to those of nitric oxide radical. Circ. Res. 1987, 61, 866–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Palmer, R.M.; Ferrige, A.G.; Moncada, S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature 1987, 327, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Krause, B.J. Novel insights for the role of nitric oxide in placental vascular function during and beyond pregnancy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 7984–7999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. de Alwis, N.; Binder, N.K.; Beard, S.; Mangwiro, Y.T.; Kadife, E.; Cuffe, J.S.; Keenan, E.; Fato, B.R.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.J.; Brownfoot, F.C.; et al. The L-NAME mouse model of preeclampsia and impact to long-term maternal cardiovascular health. Life Sci. Alliance 2022, 5, e202201517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Garmendia, J.V.; Gutiérrez, Y.; Blanca, I.; Bianco, N.E.; De Sanctis, J.B. Nitric oxide in different types of hypertension during pregnancy. Clin. Sci. 1997, 93, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Tashie, W.; Fondjo, L.A.; Owiredu, W.K.B.A.; Ephraim, R.K.D.; Asare, L.; Adu-Gyamfi, E.A.; Seidu, L. Altered Bioavailability of Nitric Oxide and L-Arginine Is a Key Determinant of Endothelial Dysfunction in Preeclampsia. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 3251956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Fondjo, L.A.; Awuah, E.O.; Sakyi, S.A.; Senu, E.; Detoh, E. Association between endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene variants and nitric oxide production in preeclampsia: A case-control study in Ghana. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Dymara-Konopka, W.; Laskowska, M. The Role of Nitric Oxide, ADMA, and Homocysteine in The Etiopathogenesis of Preeclampsia—Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Pandey, A.K.; Singhi, E.K.; Arroyo, J.P.; Ikizler, T.A.; Gould, E.R.; Brown, J.; Beckman, J.A.; Harrison, D.G.; Moslehi, J. Mechanisms of VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) Inhibitor-Associated Hypertension and Vascular Disease. Hypertension 2018, 71, e1–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Li, F.; Hagaman, J.R.; Kim, H.S.; Maeda, N.; Jennette, J.C.; Faber, J.E.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Smithies, O.; Takahashi, N. eNOS deficiency acts through endothelin to aggravate sFlt-1-induced pre-eclampsia-like phenotype. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012, 23, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Ssengonzi, R.; Wang, Y.; Maeda-Smithies, N.; Li, F. Endothelial Nitric Oxide synthase (eNOS) in Preeclampsia: An Update. J. Pregnancy Child Health 2024, 6, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Hirashima, C.; Ohkuchi, A.; Matsubara, S.; Suzuki, H.; Takahashi, K.; Usui, R.; Suzuki, M. Alteration of serum soluble endoglin levels after the onset of preeclampsia is more pronounced in women with early-onset. Hypertens. Res. 2008, 31, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Margioula-Siarkou, G.; Margioula-Siarkou, C.; Petousis, S.; Margaritis, K.; Vavoulidis, E.; Gullo, G.; Alexandratou, M.; Dinas, K.; Sotiriadis, A.; Mavromatidis, G. The role of endoglin and its soluble form in pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2022, 477, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Barbosa, P.O.; Tanus-Santos, J.E.; Cavalli, R.C.; Bengtsson, T.; Montenegro, M.F.; Sandrim, V.C. The Nitrate-Nitrite-Nitric Oxide Pathway: Potential Role in Mitigating Oxidative Stress in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Myatt, L.; Rosenfield, R.B.; Eis, A.L.; Brockman, D.E.; Greer, I.; Lyall, F. Nitrotyrosine residues in placenta. Evidence of peroxynitrite formation and action. Hypertension 1996, 28, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Roggensack, A.M.; Zhang, Y.; Davidge, S.T. Evidence for peroxynitrite formation in the vasculature of women with preeclampsia. Hypertension 1999, 33, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Teran, E.; Chedraui, P.; Vivero, S.; Villena, F.; Duchicela, F.; Nacevilla, L. Plasma and placental nitric oxide levels in women with and without pre-eclampsia living at different altitudes. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2009, 104, 140–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Zhang, Y.; Mei, J.; Zhang, H. Arginine Metabolism in Decidual Macrophages During Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2025, 94, e70196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Rezeck Nunes, P.; Cezar Pinheiro, L.; Zanetoni Martins, L.; Alan Dias-Junior, C.; Carolina Taveiros Palei, A.; Cristina Sandrim, V. A new look at the role of nitric oxide in preeclampsia: Protein S-nitrosylation. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022, 29, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Iyer, A.K.; Rojanasakul, Y.; Azad, N. Nitrosothiol signaling and protein nitrosation in cell death. Nitric Oxide 2014, 42, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Kulandavelu, S.; Dulce, R.A.; Murray, C.I.; Bellio, M.A.; Fritsch, J.; Kaashiro-Takeuchi, R.; Arora, H.; Paulino, E.; Soetkamp, B.; Van Eyk, J.E.; et al. S-Nitrosoglutathione Reductase Deficiency Causes Aberrant Placental S-Nitrosylation and Preeclampsia. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e024008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Qian, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Orwig, A.; Chen, S.; Ding, W.X.; Xu, Y.; Kunz, R.C.; Lind, N.R.L.; Stamler, J.S.; Yang, L. S-Nitrosoglutathione Reductase Dysfunction Contributes to Obesity-Associated Hepatic Insulin Resistance via Regulating Autophagy. Diabetes 2018, 67, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Rodrigues, S.G.; Assis, K.A.; Silva, J.L.M.; Privado, D.J.T.; Alves, J.V.; Faulkner, J.L.; Bruder-Nascimento, T.; Costa, R.M. Molecular Signatures of Preeclampsia: The Role of Post-Translational Protein Modifications. Compr. Physiol. 2026, 16, e70107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Baczyk, D.; Audette, M.C.; Drewlo, S.; Levytska, K.; Kingdom, J.C. SUMO-4: A novel functional candidate in the human placental protein SUMOylation machinery. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Gusar, V.A.; Timofeeva, A.V.; Chagovets, V.V.; Kan, N.E.; Ivanets, T.Y.; Sukhikh, G.T. Regulation of the Placental Growth Factor Mediated by Sumoylation and Expression of miR-652-3p in Pregnant Women with Early-Onset Preeclampsia. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2022, 174, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Krishnamoorthy, K.; Sherman, L.S.; Romagano, M.P.; El Far, M.; Etchegaray, J.P.; Williams, S.F.; Rameshwar, P. Low dose acetyl salicylic acid (LDA) mediates epigenetic changes in preeclampsia placental mesenchymal stem cells similar to cells from healthy pregnancy. Placenta 2023, 137, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Levy, R. The role of apoptosis in preeclampsia. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2005, 7, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Meister, S.; Hahn, L.; Beyer, S.; Mannewitz, M.; Perleberg, C.; Schnell, K.; Anz, D.; Corradini, S.; Schmoeckel, E.; Mayr, D.; et al. Regulatory T Cell Apoptosis during Preeclampsia May Be Prevented by Gal-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Mei, J.Y.; Afshar, Y. Hypertensive complications of pregnancy: Hepatic consequences of preeclampsia through HELLP syndrome. Clin. Liver Dis. 2023, 22, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Yu, H.; Chen, L.; Du, B. Necroptosis in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Cell Cycle 2023, 22, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. He, L.; Zheng, S.; Zhan, F.; Lin, N. The role of necroptosis in pathological pregnancies: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2025, 169, 104460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Zhu, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Swamiappan, S.; Li, Z.; Peng, X. Pyroptosis as a therapeutic target in preeclampsia: Current research and future directions. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1622550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Li, W.; Zheng, R.; Shi, C.; Chen, D.; Sun, Y.; Hu, B.; Xu, G. Role of pyroptosis in pregnancy-related diseases. PeerJ 2025, 13, e19922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Chen, Z.; Gan, J.; Zhang, M.; Du, Y.; Zhao, H. Ferroptosis and Its Emerging Role in Pre-Eclampsia. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Edri, T.; Lianski, S.; Cohen, S.M.; Beharier, O. Placental ferroptosis in preeclampsia: An integrative and comprehensive review. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2026, 174, 104863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Katsi, V.; Alifragki, A.; Fragkiadakis, K.; Kopidakis, N.; Kallergis, E.; Zacharis, E.; Kampanieris, E.; Simantirakis, E.; Tsioufis, K.; Marketou, M. The Emerging Roles of Ferroptosis and NETosis in Pregnancy Complications: Insights into Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Tang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Novel cuproptosis-related prognostic gene profiles in preeclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024, 24, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Zheng, S.; Chen, X.; Tang, W.; Yang, D.; Han, Q. Identification and Validation of DLD as a Cuproptosis-Associated Biomarker in Preeclampsia. FASEB J. 2026, 40, e71787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Lokeswara, A.W.; Hiksas, R.; Irwinda, R.; Wibowo, N. Preeclampsia: From Cellular Wellness to Inappropriate Cell Death, and the Roles of Nutrition. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 726513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Shirasuna, K.; Karasawa, T.; Takahashi, M. Role of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Preeclampsia. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Wan, S.; Huang, Y.; Yang, H. Shedding light on the function of autophagy in complicated pregnancies. Cell Death Dis. 2026, 17, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Rustveld, L.O.; Kelsey, S.F.; Sharma, R. Association between maternal infections and preeclampsia: A systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Matern. Child Health J. 2008, 12, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Conde-Agudelo, A.; Villar, J.; Lindheimer, M. Maternal infection and risk of preeclampsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Nourollahpour Shiadeh, M.; Behboodi Moghadam, Z.; Adam, I.; Saber, V.; Bagheri, M.; Rostami, A. Human infectious diseases and risk of preeclampsia: An updated review of the literature. Infection 2017, 45, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Marlina, D.; Utomo, A.; Adriansyah, P.N.A.; Pelitawati, D.R.; Poernomo, M.A.P.D.; Sumawan, H.; Handono, B.; Aziz, M.A. Association of Bacteriuria with Hypertension Risk in Pregnant Women. Med. Sci. Monit. 2025, 31, e946167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Yadav, R.; Maity, S.; Saha, S. A review on TORCH: Groups of congenital infection during pregnancy. J. Sci. Innov. Res. 2014, 3, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Coyne, C.B.; Lazear, H.M. Zika virus—Reigniting the TORCH. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Carvajal, A.; Azpurua, H. Respiratory infection and the placenta. [Infecciones Respiratorias Virales y la Placenta]. Med. Interna 2021, 37, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  238. Taylor, B.D.; Haggerty, C.L.; Amabebe, E.; Richardson, L.S. Current Evidence of Maternal Infection With Chlamydia trachomatis and Preeclampsia Risk. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2025, 93, e70080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Cardaropoli, S.; Silvagno, F.; Morra, E.; Pescarmona, G.P.; Todros, T. Infectious and inflammatory stimuli decrease endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity in vitro. J. Hypertens. 2003, 21, 2103–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Todros, T.; Verdiglione, P.; Oggè, G.; Paladini, D.; Vergani, P.; Cardaropoli, S. Low incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in women treated with spiramycin for toxoplasma infection. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 61, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Alvarado-Esquivel, C.; Vázquez-Alaníz, F.; Sandoval-Carrillo, A.A.; Salas-Pacheco, J.M.; Hernández-Tinoco, J.; Sánchez-Anguiano, L.F.; Liesenfeld, O. Lack of association between Toxoplasma gondii infection and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A case-control study in a Northern Mexican population. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Fichorova, R.N. Impact of T. vaginalis infection on innate immune responses and reproductive outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2009, 83, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Brabin, B.J.; Johnson, P.M. Placental malaria and pre-eclampsia through the looking glass backwards? J. Reprod. Immunol. 2005, 65, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Sartelet, H.; Rogier, C.; Milko-Sartelet, I.; Angel, G.; Michel, G. Malaria associated pre-eclampsia in Senegal. Lancet 1996, 347, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Ndao, C.T.; Dumont, A.; Fievet, N.; Doucoure, S.; Gaye, A.; Lehesran, J.Y. Placental malarial infection as a risk factor for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy in Africa: A case-control study in an urban area of Senegal, West Africa. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 170, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Adam, I.; Elhassan, E.M.; Mohmmed, A.A.; Salih, M.M.; Elbashir, M.I. Malaria and pre-eclampsia in an area with unstable malaria transmission in Central Sudan. Malar. J. 2011, 10, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Muehlenbachs, A.; Fried, M.; Lachowitzer, J.; Mutabingwa, T.K.; Duffy, P.E. Genome-wide expression analysis of placental malaria reveals features of lymphoid neogenesis during chronic infection. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Dorman, E.K.; Shulman, C.E.; Kingdom, J.; Bulmer, J.N.; Mwendwa, J.; Peshu, N.; Marsh, K. Impaired uteroplacental blood flow in pregnancies complicated by falciparum malaria. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 19, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Lwamulungi, E.; Qureshi, Z.; Obimbo, M.; Ogutu, O.; Cheserem, E.; Kosgei, R.J.; Walong, E.; Inyangala, D.; Nyakundi, G.G.; Ndavi, P.M.; et al. Placental characteristics and neonatal weights among women with malaria-preeclampsia comorbidity and healthy pregnancies. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0291172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. von Dadelszen, P.; Magee, L.A.; Krajden, M.; Alasaly, K.; Popovska, V.; Devarakonda, R.M.; Baumann, S.; Adams Waldorf, K.M.; Afshar, Y.; Ahlberg, M.; et al. Levels of antibodies against cytomegalovirus and Chlamydophila pneumoniae are increased in early onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2003, 110, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Xie, F.; Turvey, S.E.; Williams, M.A.; Mor, G.; von Dadelszen, P. Toll-like receptor signaling and pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Xie, F.; von Dadelszen, P.; Nadeau, J. CMV infection, TLR-2 and -4 expression, and cytokine profiles in early-onset preeclampsia with HELLP syndrome. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 71, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Arechavaleta-Velasco, F.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, J.; McGrath, C.M.; Parry, S. Adeno-associated virus-2 (AAV-2) causes trophoblast dysfunction, and placental AAV-2 infection is associated with preeclampsia. Am. J. Pathol. 2006, 168, 1951–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Arechavaleta-Velasco, F.; Gomez, L.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, J.; McGrath, C.M.; Sammel, M.D.; Nelson, D.B.; Parry, S. Adverse reproductive outcomes in urban women with adeno-associated virus-2 infections in early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 23, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Karimi-Zarchi, M.; Schwartz, D.A.; Bahrami, R.; Dastgheib, S.A.; Javaheri, A.; Tabatabaiee, R.S.; Ferdosian, F.; Asadian, F.; Neamatzadeh, H. A meta-analysis for the risk and prevalence of preeclampsia among pregnant women with COVID-19. Turk. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 18, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Narang, K.; Enninga, E.A.L.; Gunaratne, M.D.S.K.; Ibirogba, E.R.; Trad, A.T.A.; Elrefaei, A.; Theiler, R.N.; Ruano, R.; Szymanski, L.M.; Chakraborty, R.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 During Pregnancy: A Multidisciplinary Review. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1750–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Nobrega, G.M.; Jones, B.R.; Mysorekar, I.U.; Costa, M.L. Preeclampsia in the Context of COVID-19: Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 92, e13915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. da-Costa-Santos, J.; Reis, V.V.L.; Japecanga, R.R.; Seabra, M.; Carvalho, M.A.; Ganzeli Oliveira, A.J.; Cintra Vinchi, L.; Righi, A.B.P.; Mayrink, J.; Guida, J.P.S.; et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: Identifying healthcare delays. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2026, 172, 953–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Bachnas, M.A.; Putri, A.O.; Rahmi, E.; Pranabakti, R.A.; Aggraini, N.W.P.; Astetri, L.; Yuliantara, E.E.; Prabowo, W.; Respati, S.H. Placental damage comparison between preeclampsia with COVID-19, COVID-19, and preeclampsia: Analysis of caspase-3, caspase-1, and TNF-alpha expression. AJOG Glob. Rep. 2023, 3, 100234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Jayaram, A.; Buhimschi, I.A.; Aldasoqi, H.; Hartwig, J.; Owens, T.; Elam, G.L.; Buhimschi, C.S. Who said differentiating preeclampsia from COVID-19 infection was easy? Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021, 26, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Palomo, M.; Youssef, L.; Ramos, A.; Torramade-Moix, S.; Moreno-Castaño, A.B.; Martinez-Sanchez, J.; Bonastre, L.; Pino, M.; Gomez-Ramirez, P.; Martin, L.; et al. Differences and similarities in endothelial and angiogenic profiles of preeclampsia and COVID-19 in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 227, 277.e1–277.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Smith, E.R.; Oakley, E.; Grandner, G.W.; Rukundo, G.; Farooq, F.; Ferguson, K.; Baumann, S.; Adams Waldorf, K.M.; Afshar, Y.; Ahlberg, M.; et al. Clinical risk factors of adverse outcomes among women with COVID-19 in the pregnancy and postpartum period: A sequential, prospective meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 228, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Romero, R.; Espinoza, J.; Gonçalves, L.F.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Friel, L.; Hassan, S. The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2007, 25, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Perez-Muñoz, M.E.; Arrieta, M.C.; Ramer-Tait, A.E.; Walter, J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: Implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 2017, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Aagaard, K.; Ma, J.; Antony, K.M.; Ganu, R.; Petrosino, J.; Versalovic, J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 237ra65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Zhao, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhao, X.; Cui, D.; Hou, S.; Zhang, H. The effect of gut microbiota dysbiosis on patients with preeclampsia. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 12, 1022857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Qin, J.; Li, Y.; Cai, Z.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Liang, S.; Zhang, W.; Guan, Y.; Shen, D. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012, 490, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Ghosh, T.S.; Das, M. Emerging tools for understanding the human microbiome. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2022, 191, 29–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Zhao, Y.; Wang, B.; Wei, X.; Liu, D.; Wang, R.; Ma, H.; Qiao, Z.; Kong, N.; Feng, J.; Cui, D. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Preeclampsia: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Probiotic-Based Interventions. Mediat. Inflamm. 2025, 2025, 3010379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Woting, A.; Blaut, M. The Intestinal Microbiota in Metabolic Disease. Nutrients 2016, 8, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Round, J.L.; Palm, N.W. Causal effects of the microbiota on immune-mediated diseases. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3, eaao1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Ley, R.E.; Bäckhed, F.; Turnbaugh, P.; Lozupone, C.A.; Knight, R.D.; Gordon, J.I. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11070–11075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Ridaura, V.K.; Faith, J.J.; Rey, F.E.; Cheng, J.; Duncan, A.E.; Kau, A.L.; Griffin, N.W.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B.; Bain, J.R. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science 2013, 341, 1241214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Koren, O.; Goodrich, J.K.; Cullender, T.C.; Spor, A.; Laitinen, K.; Bäckhed, H.K.; Gonzalez, A.; Werner, J.J.; Angenent, L.T.; Knight, R.; et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 2012, 150, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Ahmadian, E.; Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S.M.; Nariman-Saleh-Fam, Z.; Bastami, M.; Zununi Vahed, F.; Ardalan, M.; Zununi Vahed, S. Pre-Eclampsia: Microbiota possibly playing a role. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 155, 104692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Ebrahimzadeh Leylabadlo, H.; Sanaie, S.; Sadeghpour Heravi, F.; Ahmadian, Z.; Ghotaslou, R. From role of gut microbiota to microbial-based therapies in type 2-diabetes. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 81, 104268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Huang, L.; Cai, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Huang, Q.; Luo, G.; Zeng, Z.; Jin, C. Gut microbiota changes in preeclampsia, abnormal placental growth, and healthy pregnant women. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Fasano, A.; Chassaing, B.; Haller, D.; Flores Ventura, E.; Carmen-Collado, M.; Pastor, N.; Koren, O.; Berni Canani, R. Microbiota during pregnancy and early life: Role in maternal-neonatal outcomes based on human evidence. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2392009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. Singh, M.; Wambua, S.; Lee, S.I.; Okoth, K.; Wang, Z.; Fayaz, F.F.A.; Eastwood, K.A.; Nelson-Piercy, C.; Reynolds, J.A.; Nirantharakumar, K.; et al. Autoimmune diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes: An umbrella review. BMC Med. 2024, 22, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Wong, B.; Lee, J.; Liang, R.; Hu, Y.; Velickovic, I.; Cavusoglu, S.; Dalloul, M.; Zhang, M. The Role of Humoral Autoimmunity in the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2026, 81, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Murvai, V.R.; Galiș, R.; Panaitescu, A.; Radu, C.M.; Ghitea, T.C.; Trif, P.; Onița-Avram, M.; Vesa, A.A.; Huniadi, A. Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: A comprehensive literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025, 25, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Mayer-Pickel, K.; Nanda, M.; Gajic, M.; Cervar-Zivkovic, M. Preeclampsia and the Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Laht, B.; Timilsina, S.; Gershwin, M.E.; Uibo, R. B Cell Tolerance and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2025, 68, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Han, J.; Cai, R.; Chen, Q.; Huang, W.; Qin, L.; Zeng, R.; Gao, R. The diagnostic and prognostic values of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2026, 26, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Spinillo, A.; Beneventi, F.; Locatelli, E.; Ramoni, V.; Caporali, R.; Alpini, C.; Albonico, G.; Cavagnoli, C.; Montecucco, C. The impact of unrecognized autoimmune rheumatic diseases on the incidence of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: A longitudinal cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Gleicher, N. Reproductive failure prior to the onset of clinical autoimmune disease. Rheumatology 1999, 38, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Clowse, M.E.; Jamison, M.; Myers, E.; James, A.H. A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 199, 127.e1–127.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Rom, A.L.; Wu, C.S.; Olsen, J.; Kjaergaard, H.; Jawaheer, D.; Hetland, M.L.; Vestergaard, M.; Mørch, L.S. Fetal growth and preterm birth in children exposed to maternal or paternal rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 3265–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Zhu, T.; Zhan, G.; Shang, Z.; Ying, Z. Causal relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A two-sample Mendelian randomized study. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Grand, B.; Udry, S.; Avigliano, A.; Alcántara, M.G.; Latino, J.O.; Voto, L.S. Exploring the association between preeclampsia and antiphospholipid antibodies. A prospective study. Lupus 2026, 35, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Siegel, C.H.; Sammaritano, L.R. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review. JAMA 2024, 331, 1480–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Nguyen, N.V.; Sandström, A.; Dominicus, A.; Svenungsson, E.; Hellgren, K.; Simard, J.F.; Arkema, E.V. Nationwide Temporal Trends in Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Treatments in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pregnancy Over Two Decades in Sweden. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025. Available online: https://acrjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.70018 (accessed on 12 July 2026). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Lui, N.L.; Haroon, N.; Carty, A.; Shen, H.; Cook, R.J.; Shanmugarajah, S.; Gladman, D.D.; Inman, R.D. Effect of pregnancy on ankylosing spondylitis: A case-control study. J. Rheumatol. 2011, 38, 2442–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Amikam, U.; Badeghiesh, A.; Baghlaf, H.; Brown, R.; Dahan, M.H. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with Ankylosing spondylitis—An evaluation of a population database. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024, 24, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Secher, A.E.P.; Granath, F.; Glintborg, B.; Rom, A.; Hetland, M.L.; Hellgren, K. Risk of pre-eclampsia and impact of disease activity and antirheumatic treatment in women with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondylarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: A collaborative matched cohort study from Sweden and Denmark. RMD Open 2022, 8, e002445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Chung, M.P.; Kolstad, K.D.; Dontsi, M.; Postlethwaite, D.; Manwani, P.; Zhao, H.; Kesh, S.; Simard, J.F.; Chung, L. Increased Rates of Obstetric Complications Prior to Systemic Sclerosis Diagnosis. Arthritis Care Res. 2022, 74, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Barilaro, G.; Castellanos, A.; Gomez-Ferreira, I.; Lledó, G.M.; Della Rocca, C.; Fernandez-Blanco, L.; Cervera, R.; Baños, N.; Figueras, F.; Espinosa, G. Systemic sclerosis and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective study from a single center. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2022, 24, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Kamper-Jørgensen, M.; Gammill, H.S.; Nelson, J.L. Preeclampsia and scleroderma: A prospective nationwide analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2018, 97, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. van Wyk, L.; van der Marel, J.; Schuerwegh, A.J.; Schouffoer, A.A.; Voskuyl, A.E.; Huizinga, T.W.; Bianchi, D.W.; Scherjon, S.A. Increased incidence of pregnancy complications in women who later develop scleroderma: A case control study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2011, 13, R183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Gutaj, P.; Sawicka-Gutaj, N.; Gruszczyński, D.; Nijakowski, K.; Ruchała, M.; Wender-Ożegowska, E. Association between preeclampsia and thyroid hormone status in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2026, 136, 17199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Toloza, F.J.K.; Derakhshan, A.; Männistö, T.; Bliddal, S.; Popova, P.V.; Carty, D.M.; Chen, L.; Taylor, P.; Mosso, L.; Oken, E.; et al. Association between maternal thyroid function and risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022, 10, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Ekka, S.C.; Sinha, M.B.K.; Kumari, A. A study of autoimmune thyroid disease in pregnant women and its effect on fetal and maternal outcome. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2024, 13, 4916–4925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Hajifoghaha, M.; Teshnizi, S.H.; Forouhari, S.; Dabbaghmanesh, M.H. Association of thyroid function test abnormalities with preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022, 22, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Teng, C.J.; Huang, N.; Chou, Y.J. Effects of Autoimmune Thyroiditis on Pregnancy Outcomes: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2016-2020. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2026, 25, e70020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Lundgaard, M.H.; Sinding, M.M.; Sørensen, A.N.; Handberg, A.; Andersen, S.; Andersen, S.L. Maternal hypothyroidism and the risk of preeclampsia: A Danish national and regional study. Matern. Health Neonatol. Perinatol. 2024, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Ma, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Hou, D.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, L. Association between the presence of autoantibodies against adrenoreceptors and severe pre-eclampsia: A pilot study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Motawea, H.K.B.; Chotani, M.A.; Ali, M.; Ackerman, W.; Zhao, G.; Ahmed, A.A.E.; Buhimschi, C.S.; Buhimschi, I.A. Human Placenta Expresses α2-Adrenergic Receptors and May Be Implicated in Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction. Am. J. Pathol. 2018, 188, 2774–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Herrock, O.T.; Deer, E.; Amaral, L.M.; Campbell, N.; Lemon, J.; Ingram, N.; Cornelius, D.C.; Turner, T.W.; Fitzgerald, S.; Ibrahim, T.; et al. B2 cells contribute to hypertension and natural killer cell activation possibly via AT1-AA in response to placental ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2023, 324, F179–F192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Zhu, L.; Li, Y. Expression of autoantibody against the M2-muscarinic receptor in patients with severe preeclampsia. J. Cent. South Univ. Med. Sci. 2016, 41, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Kabashima, K.; Weidinger, S. NK cells as a possible new player in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Barbieri, J.S.; Shin, D.B.; Margolis, D.J. Atopic Dermatitis Is Associated with Preeclampsia and Endometriosis. JID Innov. 2022, 2, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Stokholm, J.; Sevelsted, A.; Anderson, U.D.; Bisgaard, H. Preeclampsia Associates with Asthma, Allergy, and Eczema in Childhood. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743 Summary: Low-Dose Aspirin Use During Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 132, 254–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Huang, J.; Chen, X.; Xing, H.; Chen, L.; Xie, Z.; He, S.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Cui, H.; Chen, J. Aspirin and heparin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e026920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Sakowicz, A.; Bralewska, M.; Rybak-Krzyszkowska, M.; Grzesiak, M.; Pietrucha, T. New Ideas for the Prevention and Treatment of Preeclampsia and Their Molecular Inspirations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Ahn, T.G.; Hwang, J.Y. Preeclampsia and aspirin. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 2023, 66, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Ren, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Shen, C.; Luo, H. Application of low dose aspirin in pre-eclampsia. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1111371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Shanmugalingam, R.; Hennessy, A.; Makris, A. Aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia: The conundrum of how, who and when. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2019, 33, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Nilesh D’Crus, A.; Nair, S.; Jellins, J.; Da Silva Costa, F.; Hyett, J.; Salomon, C. Does Aspirin Affect Extracellular Vesicles Involved in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension 2025, 82, 1277–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Alsulami, F.T.; Hamed, E.M. Early initiation of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk pregnancies. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. McLaughlin, K.; Scholten, R.R.; Parker, J.D.; Ferrazzi, E.; Kingdom, J.C.P. Low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of severe preeclampsia: Where next? Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  322. Aldika Akbar, M.I.; Rosaudyn, R.; Gumilar, K.E.; Shanmugalingam, R.; Dekker, G. Secondary prevention of preeclampsia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1520218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Baroutis, D.; Koukoumpanis, K.; Tzanis, A.A.; Theodora, M.; Rizogiannis, K.; Bairaktaris, D.; Manios, E.; Pergialiotis, V.; Alexopoulos, E.; Daskalakis, G. Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Preeclampsia: Effects on Biomarkers and Prevention: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Chen, J.; Huai, J.; Yang, H. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies without thrombophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024, 24, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. Zhong, X.; Zeng, D. Enoxaparin alleviates preeclampsia by enhancing trophoblast function via the NSUN2-mediated m5C methylation of PAX3 mRNA. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2025, 30, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  326. Gajić, M.; Schröder-Heurich, B.; Horvat Mercnik, M.; Cervar-Zivkovic, M.; Wadsack, C.; von Versen-Höynck, F.; Mayer-Pickel, K. The Impact of Hydroxychloroquine on Primary Feto-Placental Endothelial Cells from Healthy and Early-Onset Preeclamptic Placentas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Gajić, M.; Schröder-Heurich, B.; Mayer-Pickel, K. Deciphering the immunological interactions: Targeting preeclampsia with Hydroxychloroquine’s biological mechanisms. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1298928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Anees, F.; Shahwar, D.E.; Raza, A. Impact of hydroxychloroquine on pregnancy outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: A 25 years retrospective cohort study from Asia. Lupus 2026, 35, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Ye, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Exploration of Hydroxychloroquine to Improve Perinatal Outcomes in Women with Isolated Non-Specific Auto-Antibody Positivity During Pregnancy. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Mészáros, B.; Veres, D.S.; Nagyistók, L.; Somogyi, A.; Rosta, K.; Herold, Z.; Kukor, Z.; Valent, S. Pravastatin in preeclampsia: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Front. Med. 2023, 9, 1076372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  331. Khalili, P.; Zhong, Z.; Peng, Y. The role of statins during pregnancy on maternal risk of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025, 25, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Luque, N.M.; Leader, L.; Lowe, S.M.; Horrowitz, S.D.; Tare, M.; Hinkley, V.; Matchkov, V.V.; Costantine, M.M.; Markus, I.; Liu, L.; et al. Pravastatin Corrects Endothelial Dysfunction in Ex Vivo Uterine Radial Arteries in Preeclampsia. Acta Physiol. 2026, 242, e70186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Gray, G.; Scroggins, D.G.; Wilson, K.T.; Scroggins, S.M. Cellular Immunotherapy in Mice Prevents Maternal Hypertension and Restores Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Balance in Maternal and Fetal Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Taglauer, E.S.; Fernandez-Gonzalez, A.; Willis, G.R.; Reis, M.; Yeung, V.; Liu, X.; Mitsialis, S.A.; Kourembanas, S. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy prevents preeclamptic physiology through intrauterine immunomodulation. Biol. Reprod. 2021, 104, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Coats, L.E.; Campbell, N.; Solise, D.; Chamoun, G.M.; Rawls, A.Z.; Demesa, A.; Turner, T.; Zheng, B.; Alexander, B.T.; LaMarca, B. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition improves fetal growth in a rat model of preeclampsia. Placenta 2026, 176, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Travis, O.K.; Tardo, G.A.; Giachelli, C.; Siddiq, S.; Nguyen, H.T.; Crosby, M.T.; Johnson, T.; Brown, A.K.; Williams, J.M.; Cornelius, D.C. Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Blockade Improves Uterine Artery Resistance, Maternal Blood Pressure, and Fetal Growth in Placental Ischemic Rats. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021, 25, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Small, H.Y.; Nosalski, R.; Morgan, H.; Beattie, E.; Guzik, T.J.; Graham, D.; Delles, C. Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Natural Killer Cells in Uterine Artery Function and Pregnancy Outcome in the Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat. Hypertension 2016, 68, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Dai, F.F.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Y.W.; Zhu, R.H.; Chen, L.P.; Li, Z.D.; Huang, Y.J.; Hu, W.; Cheng, Y.X. TNF-α/anti-TNF-α drugs and its effect on pregnancy outcomes. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2022, 24, e26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  339. Patel, N.B.; Vinsard, D.G.; Kattah, A.G.; Kane, S.V. Decreased Risk of Preeclampsia in Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2023, 68, 3557–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  340. Kumar, V.; Stewart, J.H., 4th. The complement system in human pregnancy and preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1617140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  341. Pierik, E.; Prins, J.R.; van Goor, H.; Dekker, G.A.; Daha, M.R.; Seelen, M.A.J.; Scherjon, S.A. Dysregulation of Complement Activation and Placental Dysfunction: A Potential Target to Treat Preeclampsia? Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Stefanovic, V. The Extended Use of Eculizumab in Pregnancy and Complement Activation–Associated Diseases Affecting Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Kidneys—The Future Is Now? J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Collier, A.Y.; Smith, L.A.; Karumanchi, S.A. Review of the immune mechanisms of preeclampsia and the potential of immune modulating therapy. Hum. Immunol. 2021, 82, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  344. Zheng, S.; Xu, P.; Shen, H.; Shu, C. Immune dysregulation in preeclampsia: Integrative analysis of peripheral transcriptomes and placental single-cell landscapes. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1638603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Tong, S.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.J.; Hastie, R.; Brownfoot, F.; Cluver, C.; Hannan, N. Pravastatin, proton-pump inhibitors, metformin, micronutrients, and biologics: New horizons for the prevention or treatment of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 226, S1157–S1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  346. Horii, M.; Morey, R.; Chousal, J.N.; Edlabadkar, A.; Hakim, A.; Liu, T.N.; Meads, M.; Stanley, V.; La Belle, S.; Adkins, S.; et al. Clinical and Molecular Differences of Hypertensive Disorders During Pregnancy. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2026, 46, e323457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Ertl, R.; Syngelaki, A.; Frank, O.; Lüftinger, L.; Lukáčová, E.; Lumby, C.; Stütz, A.; Beisken, S.; Posch, A.E.; Nicolaides, K.H. First-trimester multi-modal cell-free DNA analysis for prediction of preterm and term preeclampsia. AJOG Glob. Rep. 2026, 6, 100659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xue, L.; He, C. Nano-Enabled Therapeutics: Novel Strategies for Preeclampsia Treatment. Int. J. Nanomed. 2026, 21, 578148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Events regulating galectin expression and the roles of different galectins in placentation. The hormones that regulate galectin expression are sex hormones (progesterone (PRG), 17-β estradiol, prolactin); however, in placentation, the key hormones are PRG and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Hypoxia and epigenetic changes induced by environmental factors can also alter galectin expression.
Figure 1. Events regulating galectin expression and the roles of different galectins in placentation. The hormones that regulate galectin expression are sex hormones (progesterone (PRG), 17-β estradiol, prolactin); however, in placentation, the key hormones are PRG and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Hypoxia and epigenetic changes induced by environmental factors can also alter galectin expression.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g001
Figure 2. The Role of Galectins in Placentation and Preeclampsia. The influence of galectins on critical functions during placentation is depicted. Galectin expression is notably affected by various factors, as illustrated in Figure 1. Significant aspects of placentation include the involvement of galectins in trophoblast/endothelial interactions, the promotion of immune tolerance, and trophoblast invasion. The levels of galectins 1 and 9 have been identified as potential predictors of preeclampsia, as indicated in the figure. In contrast, galectins 13 and 14 consistently show low levels across both stages of preeclampsia. Furthermore, galectin 3 levels do not demonstrate specificity to the stage of preeclampsia.
Figure 2. The Role of Galectins in Placentation and Preeclampsia. The influence of galectins on critical functions during placentation is depicted. Galectin expression is notably affected by various factors, as illustrated in Figure 1. Significant aspects of placentation include the involvement of galectins in trophoblast/endothelial interactions, the promotion of immune tolerance, and trophoblast invasion. The levels of galectins 1 and 9 have been identified as potential predictors of preeclampsia, as indicated in the figure. In contrast, galectins 13 and 14 consistently show low levels across both stages of preeclampsia. Furthermore, galectin 3 levels do not demonstrate specificity to the stage of preeclampsia.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g002
Figure 3. Interactions between trophoblasts and NK cells. The interactions between the HLA expressed by the trophoblast and the counterpart receptors on NK cells. HLA is the key protein expressed on the trophoblast and is dependent on the father’s genetic background. In the case of HLA-C*02, two distinct receptors on maternal NK cells are involved. The activating receptor, KIR2 DS1, activates the trophoblast, whereas the counterpart, KIR2 DL1, inhibits trophoblast function and is consequently associated with PE. In the case of HLAC1 expression by the trophoblast, the two receptors (KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3) are inhibitory, induce a tolerogenic response in NK cells, and protect trophoblast functions. HLA-E binds to the inhibitory complex CD94/NKG2A and to HLA-G, to KIR2Dl4 and LIR1. HLA-E and HLA-G regulate inflammatory responses. A decrease in HLA-E and HLA-G expression predisposes the trophoblast to NK cytotoxic lysis upon activation.
Figure 3. Interactions between trophoblasts and NK cells. The interactions between the HLA expressed by the trophoblast and the counterpart receptors on NK cells. HLA is the key protein expressed on the trophoblast and is dependent on the father’s genetic background. In the case of HLA-C*02, two distinct receptors on maternal NK cells are involved. The activating receptor, KIR2 DS1, activates the trophoblast, whereas the counterpart, KIR2 DL1, inhibits trophoblast function and is consequently associated with PE. In the case of HLAC1 expression by the trophoblast, the two receptors (KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3) are inhibitory, induce a tolerogenic response in NK cells, and protect trophoblast functions. HLA-E binds to the inhibitory complex CD94/NKG2A and to HLA-G, to KIR2Dl4 and LIR1. HLA-E and HLA-G regulate inflammatory responses. A decrease in HLA-E and HLA-G expression predisposes the trophoblast to NK cytotoxic lysis upon activation.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g003
Figure 4. Extracellular in normal and PE pregnancies. The figure illustrates the various types of extracellular vesicles and their correlation with size and cellular processes. Centrally, the structure encompasses pro-tolerogenic or pro-inflammatory mediators, contingent upon the specific cell type and conditions. These vesicles may be characterized by the presence of tetraspanin antigens such as CD9, CD63, and CD81, as well as annexins and other mediators, as detailed within the text. It is essential to highlight the three categories of RNA: messenger RNA, microRNA, and long non-coding RNA, all of which significantly influence the target tissue. The central section of the figure is derived from a template obtained from the BioRender website (Biorender.com). The template does not include the corona complex. The content of the complex is described in the text.
Figure 4. Extracellular in normal and PE pregnancies. The figure illustrates the various types of extracellular vesicles and their correlation with size and cellular processes. Centrally, the structure encompasses pro-tolerogenic or pro-inflammatory mediators, contingent upon the specific cell type and conditions. These vesicles may be characterized by the presence of tetraspanin antigens such as CD9, CD63, and CD81, as well as annexins and other mediators, as detailed within the text. It is essential to highlight the three categories of RNA: messenger RNA, microRNA, and long non-coding RNA, all of which significantly influence the target tissue. The central section of the figure is derived from a template obtained from the BioRender website (Biorender.com). The template does not include the corona complex. The content of the complex is described in the text.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g004
Figure 5. Cytokines and PE. The figure delineates the effects of various processes involved in PE and cytokine transcription and secretion. The pathophysiology of cell damage in the placenta involves elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines and mediators that affect the maternal endothelium. This induces peripheral inflammation, increases blood pressure, and activates a multi-organ response. Furthermore, individuals with a history of autoimmune diseases or essential hypertension prior to pregnancy are at an elevated risk of developing PE. The critical transcription factors in PE are Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and NFκB. References [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150] were used to generate the figure.
Figure 5. Cytokines and PE. The figure delineates the effects of various processes involved in PE and cytokine transcription and secretion. The pathophysiology of cell damage in the placenta involves elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines and mediators that affect the maternal endothelium. This induces peripheral inflammation, increases blood pressure, and activates a multi-organ response. Furthermore, individuals with a history of autoimmune diseases or essential hypertension prior to pregnancy are at an elevated risk of developing PE. The critical transcription factors in PE are Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and NFκB. References [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150] were used to generate the figure.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g005
Figure 6. The role of SPMs in normal pregnancy, along with the contrasting effect of thromboxane A2. The effects of SPMs on implantation and placentation are illustrated, as are the opposing effects of thromboxane A2, a product of arachidonic acid metabolism. SPMs supplementation could be important in the early phases of implantation and pregnancy in women at high risk of developing PE.
Figure 6. The role of SPMs in normal pregnancy, along with the contrasting effect of thromboxane A2. The effects of SPMs on implantation and placentation are illustrated, as are the opposing effects of thromboxane A2, a product of arachidonic acid metabolism. SPMs supplementation could be important in the early phases of implantation and pregnancy in women at high risk of developing PE.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g006
Figure 7. Formation of oxygen, hydroxyl, and nitrogen radicals and the effect on protein and lipid nitrosylation and DNA damage in PE. The key cellular enzymes that generate superoxide radical O2 are NAPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and lipoxygenase. The increase in superoxide produced by damaged mitochondria reflects impaired function of superoxide dismutase and catalase. In the presence of free Fe3+, the Fenton reaction generates the highly reactive hydroxyl radical, which can also react with proteins, lipids, and DNA. The uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) can also produce the O2● and the NO● radicals, which form the peroxynitrite radical (ONOO●). The enzyme competes with arginase for the substrate in the absence of the cofactor Tetrahydrobiopterin (BHT4) and is unable to metabolize the Asymmetric dimethylarginine dimer (ADMA). Moreover, the excess formation of NO by immune cells via inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) can increase NO● levels, which, in the presence of overproduced O2●, can also lead to the formation of peroxynitrite. The red line corresponds to the uncoupling effect of peroxynitrite on eNOS. The SUMOylation process was not depicted in the Figure.
Figure 7. Formation of oxygen, hydroxyl, and nitrogen radicals and the effect on protein and lipid nitrosylation and DNA damage in PE. The key cellular enzymes that generate superoxide radical O2 are NAPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and lipoxygenase. The increase in superoxide produced by damaged mitochondria reflects impaired function of superoxide dismutase and catalase. In the presence of free Fe3+, the Fenton reaction generates the highly reactive hydroxyl radical, which can also react with proteins, lipids, and DNA. The uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) can also produce the O2● and the NO● radicals, which form the peroxynitrite radical (ONOO●). The enzyme competes with arginase for the substrate in the absence of the cofactor Tetrahydrobiopterin (BHT4) and is unable to metabolize the Asymmetric dimethylarginine dimer (ADMA). Moreover, the excess formation of NO by immune cells via inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) can increase NO● levels, which, in the presence of overproduced O2●, can also lead to the formation of peroxynitrite. The red line corresponds to the uncoupling effect of peroxynitrite on eNOS. The SUMOylation process was not depicted in the Figure.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g007
Figure 10. Effects of aspirin on endometrial, placental, and peripheral tissues. The effects of aspirin depicted in the figure were obtained from references [313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320].
Figure 10. Effects of aspirin on endometrial, placental, and peripheral tissues. The effects of aspirin depicted in the figure were obtained from references [313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320].
Biomedicines 14 01591 g010
Figure 11. Proposed local, vascular, and anti-inflammatory effects of heparin in PE. The effect of heparin has been depicted from [314,320,321,322,323,324,325].
Figure 11. Proposed local, vascular, and anti-inflammatory effects of heparin in PE. The effect of heparin has been depicted from [314,320,321,322,323,324,325].
Biomedicines 14 01591 g011
Figure 12. Comparison of the proposed effects of statins and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on immune response modulation in PE. References [326,327,328,329,330,331,332] were used to make the figure.
Figure 12. Comparison of the proposed effects of statins and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on immune response modulation in PE. References [326,327,328,329,330,331,332] were used to make the figure.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g012
Figure 14. Pathogenesis of preeclampsia: from upstream etiologies to systemic manifestations. The transition from a healthy pregnancy (left) to PE is driven by upstream factors triggering placental dysregulation, altered galectin signaling, and oxidative stress (center). This local dysfunction drives systemic progression to severe maternal complications (right). Importantly, the immune response plays a crucial role in all these scenarios; therefore, changes in immune response are expected across these conditions and generated via Nano Banana.
Figure 14. Pathogenesis of preeclampsia: from upstream etiologies to systemic manifestations. The transition from a healthy pregnancy (left) to PE is driven by upstream factors triggering placental dysregulation, altered galectin signaling, and oxidative stress (center). This local dysfunction drives systemic progression to severe maternal complications (right). Importantly, the immune response plays a crucial role in all these scenarios; therefore, changes in immune response are expected across these conditions and generated via Nano Banana.
Biomedicines 14 01591 g014
Table 1. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in predicting preeclampsia onset and associated complications [2,87,90].
Table 1. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in predicting preeclampsia onset and associated complications [2,87,90].
sFlt-1/PlGF RatioResultInterpretation
<38Negative test.Excludes the diagnosis of preeclampsia in patients with suspected preeclampsia. Indicates a low risk of preterm birth.
≤38 y < 84Positive test abnormalSuggestive of placental dysfunction. Increased risk of preterm birth.
≥85Positive test abnormalIndicates placental dysfunction. Effectively predicts the onset of PE, with a high risk of preterm birth and associated complications.
Table 3. Relevant Autoantibodies in PE.
Table 3. Relevant Autoantibodies in PE.
AntibodyPathologic EffectsRef.
Antiphospholipid antibodiesIncreased blood clotting and damage to the endothelial lining, leading to vasoconstriction and high blood pressure.[284,290]
Anti-thyroid antibodiesAffect the function of the thyroid gland. May interact with antigens in the fetus or placenta.[302,303,304,305]
Anti-α adrenergic receptorIt may stimulate placental α-adrenergic receptors, thereby elevating blood pressure.[306,307]
Anti-β adrenergic receptorThe results are controversial and need to be confirmed through large-scale studies.[306]
Anti-angiotensin II type IThe autoantibodies may cause hypertension and other abnormalities by increasing sFlt-1 and ET-1 levels.[308]
Anti-muscarinic receptorThe results are controversial and need to be confirmed through large-scale studies.[309]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garmendia, J.V.; Azpurua, H.; García, A.H.; De Sanctis, J.B. The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia. Biomedicines 2026, 14, 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071591

AMA Style

Garmendia JV, Azpurua H, García AH, De Sanctis JB. The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia. Biomedicines. 2026; 14(7):1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garmendia, Jenny Valentina, Humberto Azpurua, Alexis Hipólito García, and Juan Bautista De Sanctis. 2026. "The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia" Biomedicines 14, no. 7: 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071591

APA Style

Garmendia, J. V., Azpurua, H., García, A. H., & De Sanctis, J. B. (2026). The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia. Biomedicines, 14(7), 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop