Next Article in Journal
Preimplantation Testing of Human Blastomeres for Aneuploidy Increases IVF Success in Couples Where Male Partners Had Abnormal Semen Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNA Signatures in Endometrial Receptivity—Unlocking Their Role in Embryo Implantation and IVF Success: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Repetitive Mild but Not Single Moderate Brain Trauma Is Associated with TAR DNA-Binding Protein 43 Mislocalization and Glial Activation in the Mouse Spinal Cord
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Brain Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms and Future Promising Treatments”

Department of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(5), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051190
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 12 May 2025 / Published: 13 May 2025
This Special Issue of Biomedicines presents 12 published, peer-reviewed articles on the theme of “Brain Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms and Future Promising Treatments”, including 10 original research papers and 2 reviews covering the topics related to the pathophysiology of acquired central nervous system (CNS) injuries, as well as biomarker discovery, diagnosis, and potential pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches in the treatment of these disorders.
Each year, upwards of 85 million people sustain acquired brain injuries, the most common of which are traumatic injuries and stroke. The treatment of injured CNS tissue, due to its structural and functional complexity and slow regeneration rate, presents a particular challenge for medical practitioners. Most of the therapeutic approaches in brain injury management that have been studied in the preclinical and clinical settings have been focused on trying to reduce the consequences of initial injury and enhance the function of the remaining brain and spinal cord tissue. However, there is still the unmet need to regenerate or replace damaged or necrotic tissue. One promising approach for the repair of traumatically injured brains involves using nanotechnology and tissue engineering approaches, techniques that focus on bridging structural gaps and allowing the reconnection of severed neuronal processes.
In this Special Issue, we aimed to cover recent research from preclinical and clinical studies and present relevant and up-to-date reviews, thus highlighting the current knowledge and opportunities for future tailored research in this area.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) refers to damage to the brain caused by a sudden mechanical force to the skull. It is a significant public health concern globally, affecting millions each year and often resulting in long-term disability [1]. The immediate damage caused by TBI, as well as the secondary pathophysiological changes within the CNS, can have life-long consequences [2]. The severity of TBI is categorized as mild, moderate, or severe, with mild TBI, commonly referred to as a concussion, being the most prevalent form. However, even mild TBI can result in chronic health issues, particularly when it occurs repeatedly, as is common in contact sports or among military personnel [3,4,5,6].
While mild TBIs are generally temporary, moderate and severe injuries often result in more significant neurological impairments, requiring intensive neurorehabilitation. Notably, both single and repetitive TBIs are associated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy [4,7,8,9,10]. A common pathological marker among these conditions is the aggregation of the TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) [11]. Research conducted by Janković et al. [12] explored the effects of both moderate and repetitive mild TBIs on TDP-43 expression in the cervical spinal cord of mice. The findings indicate that repetitive mild TBI leads to significant increases in TDP-43 aggregation and microglial activation, suggesting a detrimental long-term impact on the CNS.
In addition to the immediate damage caused by mechanical forces, TBI often triggers a range of secondary injury processes, including an elevation in intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral edema, and hypoxia. Hernandez et al. [13] explored the role of cathepsin B (Cath B) in the progression of TBI in a rat model, particularly under conditions of elevated ICP. Previous research has shown that elevated ICP following TBI exacerbates neuronal membrane disruption [14]. Cath B is a lysosomal protease implicated in different TBI pathologies, e.g., cell damage and death processes [15,16], and it seems to have a role in the exacerbation of behavioral morbidities following TBI [17,18]. While direct effects of Cath B on membrane disruption were not conclusively established in the study by Hernandez et al. [13], their results suggest a potential involvement of Cath B in TBI-induced sensory hypersensitivity. This finding warrants further research into Cath B’s role in TBI progression and provides compelling evidence that inhibiting Cath B may serve as a viable neuroprotective strategy in TBI management.
TBI is often accompanied by hydrocephalus, a condition characterized by the impaired flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and ventricular enlargement [19]. It often leads to significant neurological impairments, including gait disturbance, cognitive deficits, and urinary incontinence [19,20,21,22]. However, in many patients with hydrocephalus, bladder dysfunction more commonly appears as storage-related symptoms, including frequent urination, urgency, and detrusor overactivity, rather than true incontinence [23]. The periaqueductal gray and the locus coeruleus are the key brain regions involved in the regulation of the micturition reflex, and changes in these regions are associated with bladder dysfunction in hydrocephalus [23]. Loucano et al. [24] investigated hydrocephalus in a rat model. Their findings suggest that urinary dysfunction in hydrocephalus may stem from disrupted descending noradrenergic modulation, pointing to significant neurological consequences due to the damaged brainstem circuits.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychological condition that can arise following exposure to traumatic events. While PTSD is typically associated with emotional and psychological trauma, there is growing evidence suggesting that it can also be linked to neurological injury, including TBI [24,25,26]. PTSD symptoms, such as intrusive memories, flashbacks, and hyperarousal, are common among individuals who have sustained TBI, particularly mild TBI [27]. Gillam et al. [28] reviewed the relationship between TBI and PTSD. Their work highlights the bidirectional relationship between these conditions, emphasizing the role of neuroinflammation and altered stress response mechanisms. The review suggests that future research should focus on integrative therapeutic approaches that address both neurological and psychological aspects of TBI-related PTSD.
The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new challenges in understanding the neurological implications of viral infections [29,30,31]. Mavroudis et al. [31] explored post-COVID-19 neurological syndrome (PCNS) and its similarities to post-concussion syndrome, highlighting overlapping symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive difficulties, and mood and sleep disturbances. Their review identifies shared mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, autonomic dysfunction, and prolonged cognitive deficits. These findings suggest that the lessons learned from TBI research could inform therapeutic approaches for PCNS, particularly in individuals experiencing long-term cognitive impairment post-COVID-19.
Disorders of consciousness (DoCs), such as coma, minimally conscious state, or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, are common consequences of TBI. Recovery from DoC is typically assessed through behaviors like responding to stimuli or following commands [32]. Gangemi et al. [33] explored the potential of transcranial stimulation in modulating neuroplasticity following TBI. Using rodent models, they demonstrate significant improvements in cognitive recovery, supporting the therapeutic promise of non-invasive brain stimulation in TBI rehabilitation. Their findings showed that a combination of robotic verticalization training and transcranial direct current stimulation enhances motor function and hemodynamic stability in individuals with DoC.
Foot drop syndrome (FDS) is a common condition in people with severe acquired brain injury (ABI); it is characterized by significant weakening and atrophy of the dorsiflexor muscles of the foot [34]. Piccione et al. [34] proposed a simplified electrophysiological screening for identifying the causes of FDS to help clinicians to recognize the significant clinical predictors of poor outcomes in severe ABI at admission to an intensive rehabilitation unit. Their electrophysiological screening method allows for the early identification of neuropathies associated with ABI, improving rehabilitative strategies for these patients. Their study demonstrates that precise diagnostic tools can facilitate early interventions, ultimately enhancing functional recovery and mobility in affected individuals.
The severity of TBI is often assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), which measures the level of consciousness following injury [35]. However, the predictive value of the GCS in terms of long-term outcomes remains limited [36,37]. Friedrich et al. [38] investigated the pathophysiology of TBI in a clinical cohort, analyzing inflammatory markers and their correlation with cognitive and motor deficits. Their findings suggest that targeting specific inflammatory pathways could offer new therapeutic avenues for TBI treatment. Specifically, they report that the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio serves as a potential biomarker for predicting in-hospital mortality in TBI patients, offering a valuable prognostic tool for clinical management. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that metabolites can be a crucial biomarker for TBI [39]. Detecting the changes in these metabolites may be significant for evaluating post-TBI neurological recovery [40]. Research has linked TBI severity to specific biomolecules, such as medium-chain fatty acids and certain phospholipids, but the exact role of these metabolites remains unclear [39,41,42]. Duan et al. [40] investigated the causal effect of serum metabolites and CSF metabolites on TBI susceptibility through Mendelian randomization. A metabolic pathway analysis found ten related pathways that played a role in the pathogenesis of TBI, which may help us to better comprehend the underlying mechanisms of TBI. These metabolites may serve as useful circulating biomarkers in clinical screening and prevention, and could also be candidate molecules for the exploration of mechanisms and drug targets.
Ischemic stroke, a condition resulting from the blockage of blood flow to the brain, leads to neuronal injury due to the lack of oxygen and glucose [43]. While research on neuroprotective strategies for ischemic stroke has advanced, there are still significant gaps in understanding the best therapeutic interventions [43]. Antonova et al. [44] explored the potential neuroprotective effects of krypton in ischemic brain injury. Noble gases like xenon, argon, and krypton have gained attention for their potential medical applications due to their ability to exert biological effects without being metabolized [45]. These gases have shown promise in activating the Nrf2 transcription factor, which plays a key role in managing oxidative stress and enhancing cellular resistance to damage [44]. In Antonova et al.’s research [44], krypton demonstrated neuroprotective effects in hypoxic conditions, improving survival rates in animal models exposed to low oxygen levels.
In addition to ischemic mechanisms, genetic factors also contribute to the severity and risk of stroke. Pavlov et al. [46] investigate hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), a severe brain injury caused by oxygen deprivation during birth, emphasizing genetic predispositions that influence disease progression. Their study identifies key genetic variants associated with HIE severity, paving the way for precision medicine approaches in neonatal brain injury. Their findings underscore the importance of early genetic screening to identify at-risk populations for targeted therapeutic strategies.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage leads to high mortality rates due to both the initial bleeding and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) [47,48,49]. Traditional treatments targeting vasospasms, such as nimodipine, have shown limited success in improving outcomes [50]. Hofmann et al. [50] examined cerebral ischemia and its neurobiological underpinnings. Their clinical study evaluates metabolic changes post-stroke, providing insights into potential metabolic targets for therapeutic intervention. They report that variations in microvascular perfusion contribute to DCI, emphasizing the need for multimodal treatment approaches such as induced hypertension and intra-arterial nimodipine to optimize patient outcomes.
The articles featured in this Special Issue collectively advance our understanding of the mechanisms of brain injury and identify promising therapeutic strategies. Clinical studies provide valuable insights into patient outcomes and potential prognostic markers, while preclinical investigations lay the foundation for novel treatment approaches. The review studies further contextualize emerging research trends, bridging gaps between clinical observations and mechanistic insights. Future research should continue integrating these findings to optimize translational applications and improve patient care. The diversity of approaches presented in this collection underscores the complexity of brain injury and the necessity of multidisciplinary collaboration in addressing this pressing medical challenge.

Funding

This work was supported by funding provided to K.P. by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project number UIP-2017-05-9517, and a grant awarded to K.P by the University of Rijeka, Croatia, under project number uniri-iskusni-biomed-23-56.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. James, S.L.; Theadom, A.; Ellenbogen, R.G.; Bannick, M.S.; Montjoy-Venning, W.; Lucchesi, L.R.; Abbasi, N.; Abdulkader, R.; Abraha, H.N.; Adsuar, J.C.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 56–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oberholzer, M.; Müri, R.M. Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): A Clinical Review. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Semple, B.D.; Lee, S.; Sadjadi, R.; Fritz, N.; Carlson, J.; Griep, C.; Ho, V.; Jang, P.; Lamb, A.; Popolizio, B.; et al. Repetitive Concussions in Adolescent Athletes—Translating Clinical and Experimental Research into Perspectives on Rehabilitation Strategies. Front. Neurol. 2015, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vile, A.R.; Atkinson, L. Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: The Cellular Sequela to Repetitive Brain Injury. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 41, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McKee, A.C.; Robinson, M.E. Military-Related Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurodegeneration. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2014, 10, S242–S253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bryan, C.J.; Clemans, T.A. Repetitive Traumatic Brain Injury, Psychological Symptoms, and Suicide Risk in a Clinical Sample of Deployed Military Personnel. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Armstrong, R.A. Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease. Folia Neuropathol. 2019, 57, 87–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kenney, K.; Iacono, D.; Edlow, B.L.; Katz, D.I.; Diaz-Arrastia, R.; Dams-O’Connor, K.; Daneshvar, D.H.; Stevens, A.; Moreau, A.L.; Tirrell, L.S.; et al. Dementia After Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Coexistence of Multiple Proteinopathies. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 77, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barker, S.; Paul, B.D.; Pieper, A.A. Increased Risk of Aging-Related Neurodegenerative Disease after Traumatic Brain Injury. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Delic, V.; Beck, K.D.; Pang, K.C.H.; Citron, B.A. Biological Links between Traumatic Brain Injury and Parkinson’s Disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Johnson, V.E.; Stewart, W.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Smith, D.H. Acute and Chronically Increased Immunoreactivity to Phosphorylation-Independent but Not Pathological TDP-43 after a Single Traumatic Brain Injury in Humans. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 122, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Janković, T.; Rajič Bumber, J.; Gržeta Krpan, N.; Dolenec, P.; Jaeger, M.; Kriz, J.; Župan, G.; Pilipović, K. Repetitive Mild but Not Single Moderate Brain Trauma Is Associated with TAR DNA-Binding Protein 43 Mislocalization and Glial Activation in the Mouse Spinal Cord. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hernandez, M.; Regan, S.; Ansari, R.; Logan-Wesley, A.; Lilova, R.; Levi, C.; Gorse, K.; Lafrenaye, A. The Effects of Cathepsin B Inhibition in the Face of Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury and Secondary Intracranial Pressure Elevation. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lafrenaye, A.D.; Krahe, T.E.; Povlishock, J.T. Moderately Elevated Intracranial Pressure after Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated with Exacerbated Neuronal Pathology and Behavioral Morbidity in the Rat. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chaitanya, G.V.; Babu, P.P. Multiple Apoptogenic Proteins Are Involved in the Nuclear Translocation of Apoptosis Inducing Factor during Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rat. Brain Res. 2008, 1246, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, K.D.; Sarkar, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Patra, D.; Sengupta, D.; Banerjee, S.; Chakraborty, P.; Sadhukhan, G.C. Cathepsin B Mediated Scramblase Activation Triggers Cytotoxicity and Cell Cycle Arrest by Andrographolide to Overcome Cellular Resistance in Cisplatin Resistant Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma HepG2 Cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 68, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hook, G.R.; Yu, J.; Sipes, N.; Pierschbacher, M.D.; Hook, V.; Kindy, M.S. The Cysteine Protease Cathepsin B Is a Key Drug Target and Cysteine Protease Inhibitors Are Potential Therapeutics for Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2014, 31, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, C.-L.; Chen, X.-P.; Yang, R.; Sun, Y.-X.; Li, Q.-Q.; Bao, H.-J.; Cao, Q.-Q.; Ni, H.; Qin, Z.-H.; Tao, L.-Y. Cathepsin B Contributes to Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Cell Death through a Mitochondria-Mediated Apoptotic Pathway. J. Neurosci. Res. 2010, 88, 2847–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hochstetler, A.; Raskin, J.; Blazer-Yost, B.L. Hydrocephalus: Historical Analysis and Considerations for Treatment. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2022, 27, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olopade, F.E.; Shokunbi, M.T.; Sirén, A.-L. The Relationship between Ventricular Dilatation, Neuropathological and Neurobehavioural Changes in Hydrocephalic Rats. Fluids Barriers CNS 2012, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Del Bigio, M.R. Neuropathology and Structural Changes in Hydrocephalus. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2010, 16, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sakakibara, R. Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Patients with Brain Lesions. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2015, 130, 269–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sakakibara, R.; Kanda, T.; Sekido, T.; Uchiyama, T.; Awa, Y.; Ito, T.; Liu, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamanishi, T.; Yuasa, T.; et al. Mechanism of Bladder Dysfunction in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2008, 27, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Van Praag, D.L.G.; Cnossen, M.C.; Polinder, S.; Wilson, L.; Maas, A.I.R. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after Civilian Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Rates. J. Neurotrauma 2019, 36, 3220–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaplan, G.B.; Leite-Morris, K.A.; Wang, L.; Rumbika, K.K.; Heinrichs, S.C.; Zeng, X.; Wu, L.; Arena, D.T.; Teng, Y.D. Pathophysiological Bases of Comorbidity: Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 210–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. O’Neil, M.E.; Klyce, D.W.; Pogoda, T.K.; Cifu, D.X.; Eggleston, B.E.; Cameron, D.C.; Wilde, E.A.; Walker, W.C.; Carlson, K.F. Associations Among PTSD and Postconcussive Symptoms in the Long-Term Impact of Military-Relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Prospective, Longitudinal Study Cohort. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021, 36, E363–E372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Howlett, J.R.; Nelson, L.D.; Stein, M.B. Mental Health Consequences of Traumatic Brain Injury. Biol. Psychiatry 2022, 91, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gillam, W.; Godbole, N.; Sangam, S.; DeTommaso, A.; Foreman, M.; Lucke-Wold, B. Neurologic Injury-Related Predisposing Factors of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Critical Examination. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Winter, D.; Braw, Y. COVID-19: Impact of Diagnosis Threat and Suggestibility on Subjective Cognitive Complaints. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2022, 22, 100253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, D.H.; Trojian, T.; Leddy, J.J. Post–COVID-19 Neurological Syndrome and Concussion. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2022, 32, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mavroudis, I.; Petridis, F.; Petroaie, A.D.; Ciobica, A.; Kamal, F.Z.; Honceriu, C.; Iordache, A.; Ionescu, C.; Novac, B.; Novac, O. Exploring Symptom Overlaps: Post-COVID-19 Neurological Syndrome and Post-Concussion Syndrome in Athletes. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Luca, R.; Bonanno, M.; Vermiglio, G.; Trombetta, G.; Andidero, E.; Caminiti, A.; Pollicino, P.; Rifici, C.; Calabrò, R.S. Robotic Verticalization plus Music Therapy in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Promising Results from a Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gangemi, A.; De Luca, R.; Fabio, R.A.; Bonanno, M.; Cardile, D.; Mignacca, M.R.; Rifici, C.; Corallo, F.; Quartarone, A.; Impellizzeri, F.; et al. Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Robotic Verticalization in Minimally Conscious State. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Piccione, F.; Cerasa, A.; Tonin, P.; Carozzo, S.; Calabrò, R.S.; Masiero, S.; Lucca, L.F. Electrophysiological Screening to Assess Foot Drop Syndrome in Severe Acquired Brain Injury in Rehabilitative Settings. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brazinova, A.; Rehorcikova, V.; Taylor, M.S.; Buckova, V.; Majdan, M.; Psota, M.; Peeters, W.; Feigin, V.; Theadom, A.; Holkovic, L.; et al. Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Europe: A Living Systematic Review. J. Neurotrauma 2021, 38, 1411–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maas, A.I.R.; Menon, D.K.; Adelson, P.D.; Andelic, N.; Bell, M.J.; Belli, A.; Bragge, P.; Brazinova, A.; Büki, A.; Chesnut, R.M.; et al. Traumatic Brain Injury: Integrated Approaches to Improve Prevention, Clinical Care, and Research. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 987–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carney, N.; Totten, A.M.; O’Reilly, C.; Ullman, J.S.; Hawryluk, G.W.J.; Bell, M.J.; Bratton, S.L.; Chesnut, R.; Harris, O.A.; Kissoon, N.; et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery 2017, 80, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Friedrich, M.; Haferkorn, K.; Stein, M.; Uhl, E.; Bender, M. Prediction of Initial CRP/Albumin Ratio on In-Hospital Mortality in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Orešič, M.; Posti, J.P.; Kamstrup-Nielsen, M.H.; Takala, R.S.K.; Lingsma, H.F.; Mattila, I.; Jäntti, S.; Katila, A.J.; Carpenter, K.L.H.; Ala-Seppälä, H.; et al. Human Serum Metabolites Associate with Severity and Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury. eBioMedicine 2016, 12, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duan, A.; Qiu, Y.; Song, B.; Tao, Y.; Wang, M.; Yin, Z.; Xie, M.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Sun, X. Metabolome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Assessing the Causal Role of Serum and Cerebrospinal Metabolites in Traumatic Brain Injury. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thomas, I.; Dickens, A.M.; Posti, J.P.; Czeiter, E.; Duberg, D.; Sinioja, T.; Kråkström, M.; Retel Helmrich, I.R.A.; Wang, K.K.W.; Maas, A.I.R.; et al. Serum Metabolome Associated with Severity of Acute Traumatic Brain Injury. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dickens, A.M.; Posti, J.P.; Takala, R.S.K.; Ala-Seppälä, H.; Mattila, I.; Coles, J.P.; Frantzén, J.; Hutchinson, P.J.; Katila, A.J.; Kyllönen, A.; et al. Serum Metabolites Associated with Computed Tomography Findings after Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 2673–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bolat, B.; Bayraktaroglu, C.; Degirmenci, Z.; Cerah, E.; Sali, M.; Kolcu, E.; Bars, D.N.; Aydin, C.; Abasova, F.; Alisoy, A.; et al. Unraveling the Role of NeuroD2 in Ischemic Pathophysiology: Insight into Neuroprotection Mechanisms Associated with AKT Survival Kinase. NeuroMol. Med. 2025, 27, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Antonova, V.V.; Silachev, D.N.; Plotnikov, E.Y.; Pevzner, I.B.; Yakupova, E.I.; Pisarev, M.V.; Boeva, E.A.; Tsokolaeva, Z.I.; Lyubomudrov, M.A.; Shumov, I.V.; et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Krypton Inhalation on Photothrombotic Ischemic Stroke. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yin, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, H.; Huang, H.; Liu, W. Noble Gas and Neuroprotection: From Bench to Bedside. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1028688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pavlov, V.; Papazovska Cherepnalkovski, A.; Marcic, M.; Marcic, L.; Kuzmanic Samija, R. The Association of Different Genetic Variants with the Development of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lovelock, C.E.; Rinkel, G.J.E.; Rothwell, P.M. Time Trends in Outcome of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Population-Based Study and Systematic Review. Neurology 2010, 74, 1494–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. van Gijn, J.; Kerr, R.S.; Rinkel, G.J. Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. Lancet 2007, 369, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dodd, W.S.; Laurent, D.; Dumont, A.S.; Hasan, D.M.; Jabbour, P.M.; Starke, R.M.; Hosaka, K.; Polifka, A.J.; Hoh, B.L.; Chalouhi, N. Pathophysiology of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Review. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2021, 10, e021845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hofmann, B.B.; Karadag, C.; Rubbert, C.; Schieferdecker, S.; Neyazi, M.; Abusabha, Y.; Fischer, I.; Boogaarts, H.D.; Muhammad, S.; Beseoglu, K.; et al. Novel Insights into Pathophysiology of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia: Effects of Current Rescue Therapy on Microvascular Perfusion Heterogeneity. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pilipović, K.; Dolenec, P. Special Issue “Brain Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms and Future Promising Treatments”. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051190

AMA Style

Pilipović K, Dolenec P. Special Issue “Brain Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms and Future Promising Treatments”. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(5):1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pilipović, Kristina, and Petra Dolenec. 2025. "Special Issue “Brain Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms and Future Promising Treatments”" Biomedicines 13, no. 5: 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051190

APA Style

Pilipović, K., & Dolenec, P. (2025). Special Issue “Brain Injury: New Insights into Mechanisms and Future Promising Treatments”. Biomedicines, 13(5), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop