1. Introduction
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of motor neurons (MND) in the cortex, brainstem, and spinal cord [
1]. ALS typically involves simultaneous upper (UMN) and lower motor neurons (LMN) in four different body regions (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral) and is usually fatal within 4 years from disease onset [
1]. The varying association of UMN and LMN signs makes the clinical presentation and individual survival times highly heterogeneous, ranging from a rapidly progressive disease (with a survival rate of less than three years) to a very slow progressive form in 10–20% of cases [
1,
2]. In this regard, several studies have investigated the effects of the combination of UMN and LMN burden on the clinical and prognostic features of ALS patients. UMN signs in ALS tend to follow either a vertical pattern, originating from the cervical or lumbar region and extending to the ipsilateral leg or arm, or a non-contiguous pattern. In contrast, LMN signs typically manifest in a contiguous and horizontal manner, spreading from one limb to the contralateral one. These distinct patterns of UMN and LMN involvement provide important clinical information regarding the localization and spread of motor neuron pathology [
3,
4].
Furthermore, the degree of impairment of UMN and LMN can determine the ALS phenotype ranging from classic ALS, in which both UMN and LMN signs are equally affected, to phenotypes characterized by a predominance of UMN or LMN signs [
5]. These distinct phenotypes are associated with different clinical presentation and disease progression [
6,
7]. Bearing in mind these observations, a comprehensive assessment of UMN and LMN signs in the clinical examination of ALS patients is of the utmost importance, both for identifying individuals for clinical trials and for developing personalized interventions [
3,
4]. Over the past decades, several clinical scoring systems have been developed to assess UMN and LMN impairment in ALS. Among these, the most widely adopted are the scale proposed by Devine et al. [
8] for LMN signs and the Penn Upper Motor Neuron Scale [
9] for UMN signs. Unfortunately, the above-mentioned LMN scale considers bulbar LMN involvement solely as the presence/absence of signs without providing the degree of bulbar involvement [
8]. Aiming to fill in this clinical and research gap, we developed and validated a novel scale for rating the severity of LMN signs in the bulbar region.
2. Materials and Methods
We enrolled 195 consecutive patients (89 subjects of the female gender, 45.647%; mean age at the first assessment was 62.5 ± 11.3 years) who were referred to a tertiary medical center in Southern Italy from January 2014 to January 2023, and who received a final diagnosis of clinically definite, probable, possible, or suspect ALS according to the El Escorial criteria [
10]. All of the patients underwent a standardized clinical assessment, including the collection of demographic and clinical information (i.e., date and the type of onset, date of diagnosis, and disease duration) and an assessment of the disease severity using ALSFRS-R [
11], King’s stage [
12], and Milano–Torino Staging (MiToS) [
13].
Routine blood analysis, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electromyography, 3T brain and spinal cord MRI, and a cerebrospinal fluid analysis were performed to rule out any ALS-mimicking disorders. Longitudinal clinical evaluations were conducted at 4–6 month intervals and data regarding tracheostomy, positioning of PEG, or death were recorded. The censorship date was set at 31 March 2023. Tracheostomy, positioning of PEG, or death (if occurred) were considered as outcomes. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Medical Research at Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce on 25 May 2017 (approval number 6) and was performed following the Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. All subjects provided written informed consent.
2.1. Scale Development
The El Escorial criteria (1994) defined bulbar LMN involvement as the presence of atrophy, weakness, and fasciculations over the bulbar structures, among which include the jaw, face, palate, tongue, and larynx [
10]. Accordingly, we developed a scoring system to assess the LMN signs in the bulbar region, with a progressive degree of severity ranging from 0 (no involvement) to 3 (significant, severe involvement). The score has been assigned as follows: 0 (not clinically relevant), 1 (definite but trace severity, presence of atrophy and/or fasciculation), 2 (moderate severity, 1st score criteria plus presence of tongue/larynx hyposthenia/hypomobility), and 3 (significant/severe involvement, 2nd score criteria plus presence of jaw and/or face weakness) (for a detailed description, see
Table 1). Ten raters, including neurologists specializing in ALS and in neurocognitive disorders, retrospectively applied the scale to the medical records of the first evaluation of 195 ALS patients.
2.2. Statistical Analysis
The data were explored using descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation). Differences between the male and female patients with ALS were assessed using the independent sample t-test and the chi-squared test, as appropriate. Cohen’s kappa (Cohen’s k) and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the inter-rater reliability. Linear regression was used to assess the association between the scale score, the ALSFRS-R total score, and the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore. Finally, Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to test the survival distribution according to the bulbar scale scores. All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics v.20. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Demographic and clinical features of the study cohort, divided according to gender, are reported in
Table 2. No significant differences emerged in age, disease duration, ALSFRS-R, and King’s stage distribution between males and females. Male subjects with ALS were more likely to have clinically possible ALS (
p < 0.05) and spinal onset (
p < 0.05) than female ALS subjects. The site of symptoms onset was in the bulbar region in 33.8% of cases (
n = 66). Definite and probable ALS resulted in 59.5% (
n = 116) of the entire cohort. The mean disease duration was 21.6 months and the overall ALSFRS-R score and ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore were 35.6 and 8.8, respectively. MiTos stage 4 was observed in 13.8% of patients (
n = 27) and King’s stage 4 was observed in 31.3% of patients (
n = 61).
Cohen’s kappa coefficients for all raters are reported in
Table 3. The raters showed substantial to excellent agreement with Cohen’s
k ranging from 0.834 to 0.975, with an overall ICC of 0.922 (95% CI = 0.906–0.936). The linear regression analysis disclosed a significant association between the scale score and the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (R
2: 0.207
p < 0.05), while the scale score did not result in a significant association with the ALSFRS-R total score (R
2: 0.029
p = ns). The results of the log rank test assessing the differences in the survival distribution according to the bulbar scale score are shown in
Figure 1. The survival distribution was statistically different across the three bulbar scale scores (χ
2(2) = 9.50,
p < 0.01).
4. Discussion
In this study, we proposed a novel scale designed to assess the degree of LMN involvement in the bulbar region in ALS. Overall, the scale proved to be a reliable tool, as reflected by the substantial to excellent inter-rater agreement and the significant association with the ALSFRS-r bulbar subscore. Furthermore, the bulbar scale has been proven to be able to capture the overall survival associated with bulbar LMN involvement.
Involvement of the bulbar LMN in ALS is associated with a wide range of functional disabilities, including speech and swallowing dysfunctions, leading to dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia [
14]. However, although the burden of the LMN and UMN involvement across the four body regions and the bulbar onset of symptoms are well-established factors influencing the prognosis and survival in ALS, the influence of LMN in the bulbar region on patients’ survival has yet to be elucidated.
The paucity of studies on this topic is likely due to the lack of a clinical scale to assess bulbar LMN impairment. Indeed, several clinical scoring systems have been developed to assess LMN impairment in ALS, yet the most widely adopted LMN scale (i.e., the Devine scale), in contrast to the upper and lower limbs, does not provide a grading of the degree of bulbar LMN impairment and assesses signs in the bulbar region solely as a presence or absence [
8,
15]. In addition, previous studies failed to achieve a consensus regarding clinical and paraclinical exams that are able to quantify the bulbar LMN involvement [
16].
The simple four-items scale for the assessment of bulbar LMN burden in ALS that is proposed in this study proved to be a reliable tool as we observed an excellent agreement between the raters, regardless of their clinical experience with ALS. Furthermore, a higher burden of LMN bulbar signs, as assessed through the bulbar scale, resulted in an association with a lower ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore and a lower estimated survival.
These results suggest that the bulbar scale might present a suitable tool for bulbar LMN impairment assessment in clinical settings, as a complementary tool to the Devine scale. The scale proposed herein is indeed easy to administer in clinical practice as it does not require any instrumental assessment but relies only on clinical examination, and it is based on the LMN definition proposed in the El Escorial criteria [
10] which are widely adopted in the clinical practice and in most clinical trials [
17,
18].
Furthermore, this tool may be useful to better identify patients with ALS which require therapeutic interventions (e.g., positioning of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or tracheostomy) and to stratify subjects during clinical trials.
Some limitations of the study should be acknowledged. First, our center is a tertiary medical center and may be affected by selection bias, but it is worth noting that our center provides care for ALS patients to our entire region. Second, none of our subjects reached a score of 3 as the scale was applied only during the first evaluation. Third, we reported on a preliminary retrospective study and the clinical usefulness of the bulbar scale, which should be further validated in a prospective study. Finally, our sample size is relatively small, and although inclusive of different ALS phenotypes and stages, studies with a larger sample of patients are needed to further validate the bulbar scale.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the bulbar scale proposed here may represent a useful tool to assess LMN impairment in the bulbar region in ALS. A systematic quantitative assessment of bulbar LMN impairment may provide useful data about its prognosis. Indeed, the three bulbar scale scores showed significant differences among the survival distribution. Moreover, our scale is consistent with the natural progression of ALS, further confirming that the LMN burden is closely related to the global disease burden and reliably predicts the long-term survival.
Author Contributions
S.Z. and A.G.: Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis (lead); data curation (equal); writing—original draft (lead). G.M., A.I., A.F., E.D., V.G., L.T., D.U., F.C. and S.M.: data curation (supporting); writing—original draft (supporting). M.F.: formal analysis, data curation and editing. G.L.: supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Regione Puglia and CNR for Tecnopolo per la Medicina di Precisione. D.G.R. n. 2117 of 21.11.2018 (CUPB84I18000540002)—C.I.R.E.M.I.C. (Research Center of Excellence for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Brain Aging)—University of Bari Aldo Moro.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee for Medical Research at Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce on 25 May 2017 (approval number 6).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report there are no competing interest to declare.
References
- Kiernan, M.C.; Vucic, S.; Cheah, B.C.; Turner, M.R.; Eisen, A.; Hardiman, O.; Burrell, J.R.; Zoing, M.C. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet 2011, 377, 942–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zoccolella, S.; Beghi, E.; Palagano, G.; Fraddosio, A.; Guerra, V.; Samarelli, V.; Lepore, V.; Simone, I.L.; Lamberti, P.; Serlenga, L.; et al. Predictors of long survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population-based study. J. Neurol. Sci. 2008, 268, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maranzano, A.; Verde, F.; Colombo, E.; Poletti, B.; Doretti, A.; Bonetti, R.; Gagliardi, D.; Meneri, M.; Maderna, L.; Messina, S.; et al. Regional spreading pattern is associated with clinical phenotype in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2023, awad129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milella, G.; Zoccolella, S.; Urso, D.; Nigro, S.; Tamburrino, L.; Gnoni, V.; Filardi, M.; Logroscino, G. Different patterns of spreading direction and motor neurons involvement in a cohort of limb-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients from Southern Italy: Potential implication on disease course or progression? Brain Behav. 2023, 13, e2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiò, A.; Logroscino, G.; Hardiman, O.; Swingler, R.; Mitchell, D.; Beghi, E.; Traynor, B.G.; Eurals Consortium. Prognostic factors in ALS: A critical review. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2009, 10, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Milella, G.; Zoccolella, S.; Giugno, A.; Filardi, M.; Urso, D.; Nigro, S.; Tafuri, B.; Tamburrino, L.; Gnoni, V.; Logroscino, G. The impact of upper and lower motor neuron burden on diagnostic certainty, and clinical course of spinal-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A cluster-based approach. J. Neurol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabatelli, M.; Zollino, M.; Luigetti, M.; Grande, A.D.; Lattante, S.; Marangi, G.; Monaco, M.L.; Madia, F.; Meleo, E.; Bisogni, G.; et al. Uncovering amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotypes: Clinical features and long-term follow-up of upper motor neuron-dominant ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2011, 12, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Devine, M.S.; Ballard, E.; O’Rourke, P.; Kiernan, M.C.; Mccombe, P.A.; Henderson, R.D. Targeted assessment of lower motor neuron burden is associated with survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2016, 17, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quinn, C.; Edmundson, C.; Dahodwala, N.; Elman, L. Reliable and efficient scale to assess upper motor neuron disease burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 2020, 61, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brooks, B.R. El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subcommittee on Motor Neuron Diseases/Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Neuromuscular Diseases and the El Escorial “Clinical limits of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” workshop contributors. J. Neurol. Sci. 1994, 124, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cedarbaum, J.M.; Stambler, N.; Malta, E.; Fuller, C.; Hilt, D.; Thurmond, B.; Nakanishi, A.; BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). The ALSFRS-R: A revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. J. Neurol. Sci. 1999, 169, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roche, J.C.; Rojas-Garcia, R.; Scott, K.M.; Scotton, W.; Ellis, C.E.; Burman, R.; Wijesekera, L.; Turner, M.R.; Leigh, P.N.; Shaw, C.E.; et al. A proposed staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2012, 135, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tramacere, I.; Dalla Bella, E.; Chiò, A.; Mora, G.; Filippini, G.; Lauria, G.; EPOS Trial Study Group. The MITOS system predicts long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 1180–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Armon, C.; Moses, D. Linear estimates of rates of disease progression as predictors of survival in patients with ALS entering clinical trials. J. Neurol. Sci. 1998, 160 (Suppl. S1), S37–S41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colombo, E.; Doretti, A.; Scheveger, F.; Maranzano, A.; Pata, G.; Gagliardi, D.; Meneri, M.; Messina, S.; Verde, F.; Morelli, C.; et al. Correlation between clinical phenotype and electromyographic parameters in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2023, 270, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yunusova, Y.; Plowman, E.K.; Green, J.R.; Barnett, C.; Bede, P. Clinical Measures of Bulbar Dysfunction in ALS. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Beghi, E.; Pupillo, E.; Bianchi, E.; Bonetto, V.; Luotti, S.; Pasetto, L.; Bendotti, C.; Tortarolo, M.; Sironi, F.; Camporeale, L.; et al. Effect of RNS60 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A phase II multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur. J. Neurol. 2023, 30, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edaravone (MCI-186) ALS 16 Study Group. A post-hoc subgroup analysis of outcomes in the first phase III clinical study of edaravone (MCI-186) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).