Next Article in Journal
Secreted Frizzled Related Protein 5 (SFRP5) Serum Levels Are Decreased in Critical Illness and Sepsis and Are Associated with Short-Term Mortality
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Thyroid Volume Determination by Stitched 3D-Ultrasound Data Sets in Patients with Structural Thyroid Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of PD-L1 and CD3 Expression in Glioblastoma Patients and Correlation with Outcome: A Single Center Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Thyroid Physiology and Diseases: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/biomedicines11020312
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Graves’ Eye Disease: Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis

by
Kasen R. Hutchings
1,
Seth J. Fritzhand
1,
Bita Esmaeli
2,
Kirthi Koka
2,3,
Jiawei Zhao
2,
Salmaan Ahmed
1 and
James Matthew Debnam
1,*
1
Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Orbit, Oculoplasty, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai 600006, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(2), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020312
Submission received: 17 July 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 22 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Thyroid Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Graves’ disease is an autoimmune disorder in which hyperthyroidism results in various systematic symptoms, with about 30% of patients presenting with Graves’ eye disease (GED). The majority of patients with GED develop mild symptoms, including eyelid retraction, exposure of the globe, superior rectus–levator muscle complex inflammation, and fat expansion, leading to exophthalmos. More severe cases can result in extraocular muscle enlargement, restricted ocular movement, eyelid and conjunctival edema, and compression of the optic nerve leading to compressive optic neuropathy (CON). GED severity can be classified using the Clinical Activity Score, European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy scale, NO SPECS Classification system, and VISA system. CT and MRI aid in the diagnosis of GED through the demonstration of orbital pathology. Several recent studies have shown that MRI findings correlate with disease severity and can be used to evaluate CON. Mild cases of GED can be self-limiting, and patients often recover spontaneously within 2–5 years. When medical treatment is required, immunomodulators or radiotherapy can be used to limit immunologic damage. Surgery may be needed to improve patient comfort, preserve the orbit, and prevent vision loss from optic nerve compression or breakdown of the cornea.

1. Introduction

Under normal physiologic conditions, thyroid function is regulated by the hypothalamic–pituitary axis. In response to low triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) is released from the hypothalamus, leading to increased stimulation of anterior pituitary gland thyrotrophs and production of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). TSH is secreted into the blood and binds to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), causing the release of T3 and T4 from thyroid follicular cells. Through negative feedback, TRH levels decrease. This system allows the body to maintain thyroid hormone homeostasis.
This homeostasis is radically disrupted in Graves’ disease, the most common etiology of hyperthyroidism in the developed world. Graves’ disease is caused by a breakdown of immunological tolerance and the subsequent formation of antibodies that target the TSHR. These antibodies bind to TSHRs and overstimulate the release of T3 and T4 regardless of TRH or TSH levels. The elevation of thyroid hormones may cause thyrotoxicosis and deposition of autoreactive lymphocytes within thyroid tissue [1]. Additionally, the severity of immune tolerance breakdown is enhanced as the function of the TSHR, thyroid peroxidase (TPO), and thyroglobulin (Tg) is altered [2].
Graves’ disease is 5–10 times more common in women and typically presents between 30 and 60 years of age [3]. An estimated 79% of the risk for Graves’ disease can be attributed to a genetic predisposition. The other 21% results from environmental and occupational risk factors such as smoking, radiation exposure, stress, iodine toxicity, deficiency of vitamin D, and Agent Orange exposure [4]. Viruses including Hepatitis C and Epstein–Barr may also put patients at risk for Graves’ disease [3].
Many Graves’ disease symptoms are caused by elevated T3 and T4, including fatigue, heat intolerance, palpitations, weight loss, anxiety, sleep disturbance, polydipsia, and sweating [5,6]. Patients can present with a nodular goiter leading to esophageal or tracheal compression and resulting dysphagia, orthopnea, or globus pharyngeus. Graves’ disease is also associated with thyroid dermopathy, a rare disorder characterized by lesions of thickened, pigmentated skin, often involving the pretibial region [7]. There might also be clubbing of the digits and toes due to acropachy, another rare extrathyroidal manifestation [8,9].

2. Graves’ Eye Disease

Patients with Graves’ disease are also at risk of developing Graves’ eye disease (GED), an inflammatory condition of orbital soft tissues that occurs in approximately 25% of cases [10,11]. Though the exact mechanism of this disease remains unclear, a cross-reaction of TSHR antibodies and antigens appears to cause lymphocyte infiltration and activation within orbital tissue [12]. As GED progresses, inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, and eosinophils infiltrate the extraocular muscles (EOMs). Chronic GED may be further complicated by collagen deposition and fibrosis [13]. Although 90% of patients with GED have hyperthyroidism, a small percentage of patients can have euthyroidism or hypothyroidism [14].
GED is the most prevalent orbital disease, with a rate of 2% among women and 0.5% among men. It has been shown to affect all races [15]. In 70% of patients with GED, the symptoms present within 12 months of Graves’ disease onset. In some cases, GED can be the initial presentation [16,17]. Patients tend to be at a higher risk of developing GED due to smoking, stress, radioactive iodine exposure, or a family history of GED [18].
The clinical findings of GED vary based on the location of the affected orbital soft tissue. Most patients develop mild symptoms, which commonly include eyelid retraction, globe exposure, EOM inflammation, and fat expansion, leading to exophthalmos [19]. This clinical GED presentation tends to develop gradually over several months [20]. Approximately 40% of patients with GED present with EOM enlargement. This usually occurs in an older population, leading to the rapid development of more severe symptoms, including restricted ocular movement, optic nerve compression, and edema of the conjunctiva and eyelids. Typically, the more severe symptoms develop in a biphasic pattern beginning with a 6–18 month-long progressive phase and a subsequent inactive phase. Smoking history and family history of GED are often associated with these symptoms [20,21,22].
More than 80% of patients with GED will develop retraction of the upper eyelid [23]. Superior rectus–levator muscle complex enlargement has been shown to correlate with upper eyelid retraction [24]. This connection suggests that this muscle complex is the most commonly affected muscle in GED. However, the inferior rectus muscle has generally been thought to be the most commonly enlarged extraocular muscle in GED [25,26,27]. Research has shown that in GED, involvement of the superior rectus–levator muscle complex is common, although other EOMs were only shown to be involved in approximately one-third of cases. Enlargement of the superior rectus–levator muscle complex in isolation presents in 30% of GED patients [24,28].
Lower eyelid retraction is another symptom of GED and often manifests as exophthalmos and scleral show. Exophthalmos in GED can also occur due to retro-orbital fat expansion. When combined, eyelid retraction and exophthalmos can result in cornea exposure, irritation, and ulceration. These patients will also be at risk for eventual visual loss. Periorbital soft-tissue inflammation often presents as discomfort of the orbit, conjunctival injection, orbital edema, and swelling of the eyelids.
In the initial active inflammatory phase, it is common for patients to experience progressive intermittent restriction of ocular motility. This phase is also associated with conjunctival injection, edema of affected muscles, and pain with eye movement. As the disease progresses, secondary fibrosis can lead to motility restriction and resulting diplopia and strabismus [20].
Approximately 6% of GED cases involve compressive optic neuropathy (CON), which is caused by hypertrophied EOMs compressing the optic nerve at the orbital apex [29]. Clinical manifestations can include decreased visual acuity, decreased visual-evoked potentials, relative afferent pupillary defect, and visual field defects [30,31].

3. GED Grading Systems

Four primary schemes are used to classify and grade GED severity: the Clinical Activity Score (CAS), European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EGOGO) scale, NO SPECS Classification system, and VISA system.
The CAS uses a summed binary scale to identify patients with GED who could benefit from immunosuppressive therapy (Table 1). This scale uses a point system with points tallied for seven different signs and symptoms of periorbital soft-tissue inflammation. Additional points are recorded during a follow-up evaluation for progression of disease: decreased visual acuity, decreased ocular motility (≥8°), or increased exophthalmos (≥2 mm). The resulting score is highly predictive of immunosuppressive therapy efficacy. CAS scores ≥4 have a positive predictive value of 80% and a negative predictive value of 64% in predicting corticosteroid efficacy [32].
The EGOGO scale categorizes GED severity within one of three disease states: mild disease, moderate-to-severe disease, or very serious disease. The mild disease classification is used in cases with exophthalmos, mild eyelid retraction, and limited EOM involvement. Treatment for GED categorized as mild disease tends to be relatively conservative. GED cases categorized as moderate-to-severe disease present with restricted eye motility, exophthalmos of more than 25 mm, and a greater degree of inflammatory changes. Treatment for this category is usually medical. The most severe EGOGO categorization is very serious disease, including less common conditions such as corneal ulceration and CON. This categorization often requires surgical treatment [33].
The NO SPECS Classification system assigns each case a Global Severity Score, which grades based on GED signs and symptoms (Table 2). This score emphasizes GED features by order of frequency of presentation; however, this system does not provide managemental guidelines or include clinical activity [34].
The VISA system focuses on GED symptoms and physical exam findings by assessing four independently graded parameters: vision, inflammation, strabismus, and appearance. A graded score out of 10 is assigned based on the results (Table 3). Patients with a score of less than 4 are treated conservatively, but a score greater than 5 may require a more aggressive regimen as this score shows evidence of progressive inflammation [18,35].

4. Clinical Diagnosis

GED diagnosis is based on three common symptoms: exophthalmos, eyelid retraction, and restricted orbital motility [36]. These features are especially significant when they are found bilaterally. Increased T3 and T4, decreased TSH, or a family history of thyroid disease can support the diagnosis, though it must be noted that approximately 10% of patients with GED have normal or low thyroid hormone levels at disease onset [14]. Diagnosis of Graves’ disease can be confirmed through the detection of TSHR antibodies. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI can aid GED diagnosis [37,38].

5. Radiological Diagnosis

Radiological studies of patients with suspected GED help confirm the initial clinical diagnosis as they provide a detailed demonstration of orbital pathology. For example, although many GED cases initially present unilaterally, approximately 90% of cases have bilateral involvement, as seen on imaging [39]. These studies can also aid in the assessment of treatment response or progression of disease.

5.1. Computed Tomography (CT)

CT is the preferred method for evaluating the orbital bony structures, including remodeling and post-operative changes following orbital decompression (Figure 1). CT can also accurately demonstrate eyelid edema, lacrimal gland prolapse, and increased orbital fat that can result in optic nerve stretching [40,41]. CT is faster than MRI but uses low-dose radiation. Lymphocyte accumulation and mucopolysaccharide deposition can present with hypodense areas within the EOMs [39]. The Hounsfield unit (HU) density of EOMs can be used to characterize fatty infiltration in patients with GED. Hounsfield units are a measurement of soft-tissue density, with higher HU values corresponding to tissues of greater density. Water is defined as 0 HU, and values range from −1000 HU for air to 700–2000 HU for bone, and 3000 HU for certain metals. Cohen et al. found significant differences in Hounsfield unit density in cases of GED (−40.4 HU) compared to patients without GED (−34.8 HU) (p = 0.048) [42].

5.2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI is better suited than CT for the evaluation of soft-tissue structures due to its high spatial resolution with varying sequences aiding in the diagnosis of GED. MRI offers a greater range of soft-tissue contrast than CT and is better able to depict features that are obscured by bone and metal. T1-weighted and T2-weighted scans constitute the most common MRI sequences. T1-weighted images provide insight into the anatomy of an image, with contrast proving useful for defining the extent of the disease. Fat is hyperintense and appears bright white on T1-weighted sequences, which enables clear visualization of the disease involvement relative to fat. T2-weighted imaging is employed to define the characteristics of the disease.
On MRI, enlargement of the EOMs is demonstrated, and fatty infiltration causes the EOMs to appear T1 hyperintense, while edema causes them to appear T2 hyperintense (Figure 2). Additionally, superior ophthalmic vein dilation and EOM enhancement may also be noted. During the acute phase of GED, EOM belly enlargement with tendinous insertion sparing can be identified; however, occasional cases include portions of tendinous thickening. Coronal plane imaging can reveal EOM enlargement and optic nerve compression at the orbital apex (Figure 3).

5.3. MRI Correlation with Disease Severity

MRI findings have been correlated with disease severity. Kvetny et al. [43] found that the thickness of EOMs on T1-weighted sequences was significantly associated with the patients’ CAS and the duration of active disease. Tortora et al. [44] studied the signal intensity of the EOMs on the short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted post-contrast sequences and correlated the signal intensities with the Clinical Activity Score (CAS). They found a significant correlation between the signal intensity values on the STIR and T1 post-contrast sequences with the severity of the CAS scores. The authors concluded that MRI could be used to establish the activity phase of GED more than CAS by itself and that contrast-enhanced sequences may not be needed to correlate MRI with CAS.
Higashiyama et al. [45] studied the signal intensity ratios (SIRs) of the orbital fat and EOMs on STIR sequences in patients with active and inactive GED and controls. The mean SIR in the active GED group was significantly higher than both the inactive group and controls (p < 0.001). The SIR of orbital fat in all patients with GED demonstrated a significant positive correlation with that of the EOMs (p < 0.001). A correlation was also found between the severity of GED and the orbital fat SIR. The authors concluded that measuring SIRs in orbital fat may be useful in the evaluation of disease activity.
Ollitrault et al. [46] demonstrated that Dixon-T2-weighted imaging (Dixon-T2WI) has a higher sensitivity (100% vs. 94.7%) and specificity (71.2% vs. 68.5%) for assessing inflamed EOMs in patients with GED as compared to T1, T2, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI sequences at 3 Tesla. In this study, patients with confirmed GED underwent Dixon-TT2WI and conventional MRI sequences. The sequences were randomly and independently interpreted by two neuroradiologists, blinded to all data. Dixon-T2WI was significantly more likely to detect at least one inflamed EOM when compared to conventional sequences (p = 0.02) and significantly less likely to show artifacts when compared to fat-suppressed T2WI (p < 0.001). Confidence of the diagnosis was significantly higher with Dixon-T2WI than with the conventional sequences (p = 0.003).
Wu et al. [47] studied the microstructural and morphological changes in white and gray matter in GED patients using voxel-based morphometry. Compared to healthy controls, patients with GED had significantly less gray matter within the right middle frontal gyrus. Additionally, patients with GED had decreased fractional anisotropy and increased mean, axial, and radial diffusivities in the middle occipital gyrus, cuneus, and right superior occipital gyrus. The fractional anisotropy in these patients was shown to positively correlate with visual acuity (r = 0.456, p = 0.025). There was a negative correlation with the duration of disease (r = 0.609, p = 0.003). Microstructural and morphological abnormalities in areas corresponding to known functional deficits of cognition and vision were found in patients with GED.

5.4. Diagnosis of Compressive Optic Neuropathy (CON)

Enlargement of EOMs, subsequent crowding at the apex of the orbit, and fat plane effacement around the optic nerve by the muscle are common radiological signs of CON [30,48,49,50,51,52]. The increased EOM volume often leads to exophthalmos, periorbital edema, venous congestion, and elevated intraocular pressure [53,54,55,56].
Stark et al. [28] found a correlation between the visual field with the worst mean deviation (MD) and EOM enlargement on CT in patients with CON. They demonstrated that as the EOM area increases on CT, the visual field MD worsens. Using multivariate linear regression, they identified that an increased superior rectus–levator muscle complex area can accurately predict visual field MD (p = 0.01) over the total EOM area (p = 0.25). They concluded that enlargement of the superior rectus–levator muscle complex may predict worsening CON.
MRI can also be used to evaluate CON. In a study by Dodds et al. [57] optic nerve diameters were measured and compared between three different patient populations: (1) patients who have GED and CON (GED+CON+), (2) patients who have GED but do not have CON (GED+CON−), and (3) control patients who do not have GED or CON (GED−CON−). Significant differences in optic nerve diameter were noted when comparing the GED+CON+ and GED+CON− groups. No significant differences were found between the GED+CON− and GED−CON− groups. The intracranial pre-canalicular and intra-orbital apical segments of the optic nerves were the most commonly affected locations identified in their study. Additionally, there was optic nerve narrowing on MRI in some patients with GED with CON, whereas other patients in this same group presented with exophthalmos and typical EOM presentation. The authors proposed that optic nerve compression may be related to optic neuropathy caused by increased fat volume.

6. Radiological Differential Diagnosis

The radiologic differential diagnosis should include several diseases that commonly involve the EOMs. Ancillary findings are frequently required to arrive at the correct diagnosis.
Autoimmune diseases such as IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) (Figure 4) are characterized by diffuse lesions made up of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration containing storiform fibrosis and IgG4-positive plasma cells [58,59]. The lateral rectus has been reported to be the most commonly involved muscle, but this may not always be the case, and the tendinous insertions are often spared. IgG4-RD often presents with fat infiltration of the orbit, pre-septal soft-tissue swelling, and perineural involvement, which can include the maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve (V2) [60]. Additional findings on imaging include infiltration of the pachymeninges, pituitary gland, lacrimal glands, salivary glands, and the thyroid gland [58].
Idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI), previously named orbital pseudotumor, is caused by polymorphous lymphocyte infiltration with varying degrees of fibrosis, leading to painful inflammation of the orbit (Figure 5). In contradistinction to GED, IOI often involves tendinous portions of EOMs. Cases of IOI can also involve retro-bulbar fat, the optic nerve, the globe and optic nerve junction, the lacrimal glands, and the cavernous sinus [61,62].
Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare multisystem histiocytic neoplasm. ECD is characterized by lipid-laden histiocyte tissue infiltration [63,64]. Imaging findings usually show bone involvement that can present as medullary sclerosis. Other areas of involvement may include the orbits and EOMs (Figure 6), meninges, brain parenchyma, paranasal sinuses, and the hypothalamic–pituitary axis. ECD also impacts the bony spinal column, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, and pulmonary interstitium [65,66,67].
Orbital lymphoma accounts for 2% of lymphomas, making it the most common primary orbital malignancy in adults [68]. The sites of involvement of orbital lymphoma include the EOMs and retrobulbar fat (Figure 7), eyelid, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland. When lymphoma involves EOM, the presentation is usually painless and unilateral with associated tendon thickening and involvement of the tendinous insertion. MRI findings in patients with orbital lymphoma tend to be nonspecific with T1 and T2 homogeneous enhancement and an isointense signal intensity [69].
Orbital metastasis commonly involves the EOMs. Approximately 60% of EOM metastases cause EOM enlargement [70]. Additionally, about 58% of patients with orbital metastasis have already been diagnosed with a primary tumor. These primary tumors are most commonly gastrointestinal tumors, breast cancer, or cutaneous melanoma. While GED imaging findings tend to show diffuse infiltration, EOM metastasis findings show a nodular pattern (Figure 8) [71,72]. The number of EOMs affected can vary, and there may be a delay in time from the diagnosis of the primary disease. Other findings may include lesions in the bony orbit or the intracranial compartment [71].
EOM enlargement can also be caused by vascular conditions such as arteriovenous malformations, dural-venous shunts, venous angiomas, and carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. Increased venous pressure and vascular distention can cause EOM enlargement, which may be diffuse or affect a single EOM [73]. Another differential consideration is that infection which spreads from the ethmoid sinus commonly involves the medial rectus muscle [74].

7. Treatment

GED can be self-limiting, and patients often recover spontaneously within 2–5 years [12]. When medical treatment is required, immunomodulators or radiotherapy can be used to limit immunologic damage during the early active phase [75]. In the post-inflammatory phase, surgery may be needed to improve patient comfort, preserve the orbit, and prevent vision loss from optic nerve compression or breakdown of the cornea [18]. Treatment tends to be relatively effective, and the recurrence rate of GED is less than 10% [76].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.R.H., S.J.F. and J.M.D.; methodology, K.R.H., S.J.F. and J.M.D.; investigation, K.R.H., S.J.F., S.A. and J.M.D.; resources, K.R.H., S.J.F., S.A. and J.M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, K.R.H., S.J.F., B.E., K.K., J.Z., S.A. and J.M.D.; writing—review and editing, K.R.H., S.J.F. and J.M.D.; visualization, K.R.H., S.J.F., B.E., K.K., J.Z., S.A. and J.M.D.; supervision, J.M.D.; project administration, J.M.D.; funding acquisition, J.M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferrari, S.M.; Ruffilli, I.; Elia, G.; Ragusa, F.; Paparo, S.R.; Patrizio, A.; Mazzi, V.; Antonelli, A.; Fallahi, P. Chemokines in hyperthyroidism. J. Clin. Transl. Endocrinol. 2019, 16, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McLachlan, S.M.; Rapoport, B. Breaking Tolerance to Thyroid Antigens: Changing Concepts in Thyroid Autoimmunity. Endocr. Rev. 2013, 35, 59–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Antonelli, A.; Ferrari, S.M.; Ragusa, F.; Elia, G.; Paparo, S.R.; Ruffilli, I.; Patrizio, A.; Giusti, C.; Gonnella, D.; Cristaudo, A.; et al. Graves’ disease: Epidemiology, genetic and environmental risk factors and viruses. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 34, 101387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Smith, T.J.; Hegedus, L. Graves’ Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1552–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Boelaert, K.; Torlinska, B.; Holder, R.L.; Franklyn, J.A. Older Subjects with Hyperthyroidism Present with a Paucity of Symptoms and Signs: A Large Cross-Sectional Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 2715–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Devereaux, D.; Tewelde, S.Z. Hyperthyroidism and Thyrotoxicosis. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 32, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schwartz, K.M.; Fatourechi, V.; Ahmed, D.D.F.; Pond, G.R. Dermopathy of Graves’ Disease (Pretibial Myxedema): Long-Term Outcome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fatourechi, V.; Ahmed, D.D.F.; Schwartz, K.M. Thyroid Acropachy: Report of 40 Patients Treated at a Single Institution in a 26-Year Period. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 5435–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perini, N.; Santos, R.B.; Romaldini, J.H.; Villagelin, D. Thyroid acropachy: A rare manifestation of graves’ disease in joints. AACE Clin. Case Rep. 2019, 5, e369–e371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lindgren, A.L.; Sidhu, S.; Welsh, K.M. Periorbital myxedema treated with intralesional hyaluronidase. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2020, 19, 100751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wei, Y.; Kang, X.L.; Monte, M.A.D. Enlargement of the superior rectus and superior oblique muscles causes intorsion in Graves’ eye disease. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 100, 1280–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cockerham, K.P.; Kennerdell, J.S. Does radiotherapy have a role in the management of thyroid orbitopathy? View 1. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002, 86, 102–104. [Google Scholar]
  13. Glatt, H.J. Optic nerve dysfunction in thyroid eye disease: A clinician’s perspective. Radiology 1996, 200, 26–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eckstein, A.; Losch, C.; Glowacka, D.; Schott, M.; Mann, K.; Esser, J.; Morgenthaler, N.G. Euthyroid and primarily hypothyroid patients develop milder and significantly more asymmetrical Graves ophthalmopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 93, 1052–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kendall-Taylor, P.; Perros, P. Clinical Presentation of Thyroid Associated Orbitopathy. Thyroid 1998, 8, 427–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Noth, D.; Gebauer, M.; Müller, B.; Bürgi, U.; Diem, P. Graves’ ophthalmopathy: Natural history and treatment outcomes. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2001, 131, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Wiersinga, W.M.; Smit, T.; Van Der Gaag, R.; Koornneef, L. Temporal relationship between onset of Graves’ ophthalmopathy and onset of thyroidal Graves’ disease. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 1988, 11, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dolman, P.J. Grading Severity and Activity in Thyroid Eye Disease. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 34, S34–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McKeag, D.; Lane, C.; Lazarus, J.H.; Baldeschi, L.; Boboridis, K.; Dickinson, A.J.; Hullo, A.I.; Kahaly, G.; Krassas, G.; Marcocci, C.; et al. Clinical features of dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) survey. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 91, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dolman, P.J. Evaluating Graves’ orbitopathy. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 26, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kendler, D.L.; Lippa, J.; Rootman, J. The initial clinical characteristics of Graves’ orbitopathy vary with age and sex. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1993, 111, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Regensburg, N.I.; Wiersinga, W.M.; Berendschot, T.T.; Saeed, P.; Mourits, M.P. Effect of smoking on orbital fat and muscle volume in Graves’ orbitopathy. Thyroid 2011, 21, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Frueh, B.R.; Musch, D.C.; Garber, F.W. Lid retraction and levator aponeurosis defects in Graves’ eye disease. Ophthalmic Surg. 1986, 17, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Davies, M.J.; Dolman, P.J. Levator muscle enlargement in thyroid eye disease-related upper eyelid retraction. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017, 33, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crisp, M.; Starkey, K.J.; Lane, C.; Ham, J.; Ludgate, M. Adipogenesis in thyroid eye disease. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 3249–3255. [Google Scholar]
  26. Feldon, S.E.; Weiner, J.M. Clinical significance of extraocular muscle volumes in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: A quantitative computed tomography study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1982, 100, 1266–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Villadolid, M.C.; Yokoyama, N.; Izumi, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Kimura, H.; Ashizawa, K.; Kiriyama, T.; Uetani, M.; Nagataki, S. Untreated Graves’ disease patients without clinical ophthalmopathy demonstrate a high frequency of extraocular muscle (EOM) enlargement by magnetic resonance. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 2830–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Starks, V.S.; Reinshagen, K.L.; Lee, N.G.; Freitag, S.K. Visual field and orbital computed tomography correlation in dysthyroid optic neuropathy due to thyroid eye disease. Orbit 2019, 39, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bartley, G.B. The epidemiologic characteristics and clinical course of ophthalmopathy associated with autoimmune thyroid disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 1994, 92, 477–588. [Google Scholar]
  30. Neigel, J.M.; Rootman, J.; Belkin, R.I.; Nugent, R.A.; Drance, S.M.; Beattie, C.W.; Spinelli, J.A. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy: The crowded orbital apex syndrome. Ophthalmology 1988, 95, 1515–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trobe, J.D.; Glaser, J.S.; Laflamme, P. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Clinical profile and rationale for management. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1978, 96, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mourits, M.P.; Prummel, M.F.; Wiersinga, W.M.; Koornneef, L. Clinical activity score as a guide in the management of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin. Endocrinol. 1997, 47, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Boboridis, K.; Perros, P. General management plan. In Graves’ Orbitopathy; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 2010; pp. 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  34. Werner, S.C. Classification of the eye changes of Graves’ disease. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1969, 68, 646–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barrio-Barrio, J.; Sabater, A.L.; Bonet-Farriol, E.; Velázquez-Villoria, A.; Galofré, J.C. Graves’ ophthalmopathy: VISA versus EUGOGO classification, assessment, and management. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 2015, 249125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bahn, R.S.; Kazim, M. Thyroid eye disease. In Diseases and Disorders of the Orbit and Ocular Adnexa; Fay, A., Dolman, P.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2017; pp. 219–234. [Google Scholar]
  37. Polito, E.; Leccisotti, A. MRI in Graves orbitopathy: Recognition of enlarged muscles and prediction of steroid response. Ophthalmologica 1995, 209, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Regensburg, N.I.; Wiersinga, W.M.; Berendschot, T.T.J.M.; Saeed, P.; Mourits, M.P. Densities of Orbital Fat and Extraocular Muscles in Graves Orbitopathy Patients and Controls. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011, 27, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rootman, J. Diseases of the orbit: A multidisciplinary approach. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1988, 64, 143–240. [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller, M.T.; Mafee, M.F. Computed tomography scanning in the evaluation of ocular motility disorders. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 1987, 25, 733–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tan, N.Y.Q.; Leong, Y.-Y.; Lang, S.S.; Htoon, Z.M.; Young, S.M.; Sundar, G. Radiologic parameters of orbital bone remodeling in thyroid eye disease. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cohen, L.M.; Liou, V.D.; Cunnane, M.E.; Yoon, M.K. Radiographic analysis of fatty infiltration of the extraocular muscles in thyroid eye disease. Orbit 2020, 41, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kvetny, J.; Puhakka, K.B.; Røhl, L. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of extraocular eye muscle volume in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy and proptosis. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2006, 84, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tortora, F.; Cirillo, M.; Ferrara, M.; Belfiore, M.P.; Carella, C.; Caranci, F.; Cirillo, S. Disease activity in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: Diagnosis with orbital MR imaging and correlation with clinical score. Neuroradiol. J. 2013, 26, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Higashiyama, T.; Iwasa, M.; Ohji, M. Quantitative analysis of inflammation in orbital fat of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy using MRI signal intensity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ollitrault, A.; Charbonneau, F.; Herdan, M.-L.; Bergès, O.; Zuber, K.; Giovansili, L.; Launay, P.; Savatovsky, J.; Lecler, A. Dixon-T2WI magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla outperforms conventional imaging for thyroid eye disease. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 5198–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, Q.; Hu, H.; Chen, W.; Chen, H.-H.; Chen, L.; Xu, X.-Q.; Wu, F.-Y. Morphological and microstructural brain changes in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: A combined voxel-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging study. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2020, 43, 1591–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barrett, L.; Glatt, H.J.; Burde, R.M.; Gado, M.H. Optic nerve dysfunction in thyroid eye disease: CT. Radiology 1988, 167, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Birchall, D.; Goodall, K.L.; Noble, J.L.; Jackson, A. Graves ophthalmopathy: Intracranial fat prolapse on CT images as an indicator of optic nerve compression. Radiology 1996, 200, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Feldon, S.E.; Lee, C.P.; Muramatsu, S.K. Quantitative computed tomography of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Extraocular muscle and orbital fat in development of optic neuropathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1985, 103, 213–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Goncalves, A.C.P.; Silva, L.; Gebrim, E.; Monteiro, M. Quantification of Orbital apex crowding for screening of dysthyroid optic neuropathy using multidetector CT. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 33, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Nugent, R.A.; Belkin, R.I.; Neigel, J.M.; Rootman, J.; Robertson, W.D.; Spinelli, J.; Graeb, D.A. Graves orbitopathy: Correlation of CT and clinical findings. Radiology 1990, 177, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Feldon, S.E.; Muramatsu, S.; Weiner, J.M. Clinical classification of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Identification of risk factors for optic neuropathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1984, 102, 1469–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gorman, C.A. The Measurement of Change in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 1998, 8, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ohtsuka, K. Intraocular pressure and proptosis in 95 patients with graves ophthalmopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1997, 124, 570–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Peyster, R.; Ginsberg, F.; Silber, J.; Adler, L. Exophthalmos caused by excessive fat: CT volumetric analysis and differential diagnosis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1986, 146, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Dodds, N.I.; Atcha, A.W.; Birchall, D.; Jackson, A. Use of high-resolution MRI of the optic nerve in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Br. J. Radiol. 2009, 82, 541–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, G.; Cheuk, W.; Chan, J.K.-C. IgG4-related sclerosing disease: A critical appraisal of an evolving clinicopathologic entity. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2010, 39, 303–332. [Google Scholar]
  59. Stone, J.H.; Zen, Y.; Deshpande, V. IgG4-related disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tiegs-Heiden, C.; Eckel, L.; Hunt, C.; Diehn, F.; Schwartz, K.; Kallmes, D.; Salomão, D.; Witzig, T.; Garrity, J. Immunoglobulin G4–related disease of the orbit: Imaging features in 27 patients. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2014, 35, 1393–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Rothfus, W.E.; Curtin, H.D. Extraocular muscle enlargement: A CT review. Radiology 1984, 151, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yuen, S.J.; Rubin, P.A. Idiopathic orbital inflammation: Distribution, clinical features, and treatment outcome. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003, 121, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Martinez, R. Erdheim-Chester disease: MR of intraaxial and extraaxial brain stem lesions. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1995, 16, 1787–1790. [Google Scholar]
  64. Veyssier-Belot, C.; Cacoub, P.; Caparros-Lefebvre, D.; Wechsler, J.; Brun, B.; Remy, M.; Wallaert, B.; Petit, H.; Grimaldi, A.; Wechsler, B.; et al. Erdheim-Chester disease clinical and radiologic characteristics of 59 cases. Medicine 1996, 75, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Albayram, S.; Kizilkilic, O.; Zulfikar, Z.; Işlak, C.; Kocer, N. Spinal dural involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: MRI findings. Neuroradiology 2002, 44, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Allmendinger, A.M.; Krauthamer, A.V.; Spektor, V.; Aziz, M.S.; Zablow, B. Atypical spine involvement of Erdheim-Chester disease in an elderly male. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2010, 12, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Drier, A.; Haroche, J.; Savatovsky, J.; Godenèche, G.; Dormont, D.; Chiras, J.; Amoura, Z.; Bonneville, F. Cerebral, facial, and orbital involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiology 2010, 255, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Coha, B.; Vucinic, I.; Mahovne, I.; Vukovic-Arar, Z. Extranodal lymphomas of head and neck with emphasis on NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 42, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Surov, A.; Behrmann, C.; Holzhausen, H.-J.; Kösling, S. Lymphomas and metastases of the extra-ocular musculature. Neuroradiology 2011, 53, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. El-Hadad, C.; Koka, K.; Dong, W.; Do, T.; Haider, M.; Ursua, J.D.; Ning, J.; Debnam, J.M.; Esmaeli, B. Multidisciplinary management of orbital metastasis and survival outcomes. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 37, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Alsuhaibani, A.H.; Carter, K.D.; Nerad, J.A.; Lee, A.G. Prostate carcinoma metastasis to extraocular muscles. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008, 24, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lacey, B.; Chang, W.; Rootman, J. Nonthyroid causes of extraocular muscle disease. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1999, 44, 187–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shafi, F.; Mathewson, P.; Mehta, P.; Ahluwalia, H.S. The enlarged extraocular muscle: To relax, reflect or refer? Eye 2016, 31, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Towbin, R.; Han, B.K.; Kaufman, R.; Burke, M. Postseptal cellulitis: CT in diagnosis and management. Radiology 1986, 158, 735–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dolman, P.J.; Rath, S. Orbital radiotherapy for thyroid eye disease. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2012, 23, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Selva-Nayagam, D.; Chen, C.; King, G. Late reactivation of thyroid orbitopathy. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2004, 32, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 11 00312 g001 550
Figure 1. Graves’ eye disease. Coronal CT with contrast shows an enlarged left inferior rectus muscle (white arrow) and post-operative changes following decompressive surgery in the infero-medal left orbital wall and the medial aspect of the left orbital floor (black arrow).
Figure 1. Graves’ eye disease. Coronal CT with contrast shows an enlarged left inferior rectus muscle (white arrow) and post-operative changes following decompressive surgery in the infero-medal left orbital wall and the medial aspect of the left orbital floor (black arrow).
Biomedicines 11 00312 g001
Biomedicines 11 00312 g002a 550Biomedicines 11 00312 g002b 550
Figure 2. Graves’ eye disease, MRI. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows enlargement of bilateral extra-ocular muscles with sparring of the lateral rectus muscles (arrows). (B) Coronal T2 MRI sequence shows hyperintense signal signifying edema in the enlarged extraocular muscles (arrow). (C) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows the normal appearance of the extra-ocular muscles.
Figure 2. Graves’ eye disease, MRI. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows enlargement of bilateral extra-ocular muscles with sparring of the lateral rectus muscles (arrows). (B) Coronal T2 MRI sequence shows hyperintense signal signifying edema in the enlarged extraocular muscles (arrow). (C) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows the normal appearance of the extra-ocular muscles.
Biomedicines 11 00312 g002aBiomedicines 11 00312 g002b
Biomedicines 11 00312 g003a 550Biomedicines 11 00312 g003b 550
Figure 3. Compressive optic neuropathy. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows enlargement of the extra-ocular muscles at the orbital apices (arrows). (B) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows the normal appearance of the extra-ocular muscles at the orbital apices. (C) Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows crowding of enlarged extra-ocular muscles with compression upon the optic nerves (white arrows). Note sparing of the tendinous insertions of the extraocular muscles (black arrow). (D) Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows a normal appearance of the extra-ocular muscles.
Figure 3. Compressive optic neuropathy. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows enlargement of the extra-ocular muscles at the orbital apices (arrows). (B) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows the normal appearance of the extra-ocular muscles at the orbital apices. (C) Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows crowding of enlarged extra-ocular muscles with compression upon the optic nerves (white arrows). Note sparing of the tendinous insertions of the extraocular muscles (black arrow). (D) Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows a normal appearance of the extra-ocular muscles.
Biomedicines 11 00312 g003aBiomedicines 11 00312 g003b
Biomedicines 11 00312 g004 550
Figure 4. IgG4-related disease. Coronal T1 post-contrast MR sequence shows enlargement of the right superior rectus–levator complex (thick white arrow) and the inferior rectus muscle. Enhancing disease is also present around the optic nerve (black arrow) and seen involving the infra-orbital nerves bilaterally (V2) (thin white arrows).
Figure 4. IgG4-related disease. Coronal T1 post-contrast MR sequence shows enlargement of the right superior rectus–levator complex (thick white arrow) and the inferior rectus muscle. Enhancing disease is also present around the optic nerve (black arrow) and seen involving the infra-orbital nerves bilaterally (V2) (thin white arrows).
Biomedicines 11 00312 g004
Biomedicines 11 00312 g005 550
Figure 5. Idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI). Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows enlargement of the right medial rectus muscle (white arrow). Additional enhancing disease is present in the right orbit with involvement of the tendinous insertions and extension through the superior orbital fissure towards the cavernous sinus (black arrows).
Figure 5. Idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI). Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows enlargement of the right medial rectus muscle (white arrow). Additional enhancing disease is present in the right orbit with involvement of the tendinous insertions and extension through the superior orbital fissure towards the cavernous sinus (black arrows).
Biomedicines 11 00312 g005
Biomedicines 11 00312 g006 550
Figure 6. Erdheim–Chester disease. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows extra-ocular muscle enlargement and disease in bilateral retrobulbar spaces (arrows). (B) Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows the disease in the bilateral intraconal spaces.
Figure 6. Erdheim–Chester disease. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows extra-ocular muscle enlargement and disease in bilateral retrobulbar spaces (arrows). (B) Axial T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows the disease in the bilateral intraconal spaces.
Biomedicines 11 00312 g006
Biomedicines 11 00312 g007a 550Biomedicines 11 00312 g007b 550
Figure 7. Lymphoma. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows a homogeneously enhancing, well-circumscribed mass involving the right superior rectus–levator muscle complex (arrow). (B) Coronal PET image shows diffuse adenopathy throughout the neck and body.
Figure 7. Lymphoma. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows a homogeneously enhancing, well-circumscribed mass involving the right superior rectus–levator muscle complex (arrow). (B) Coronal PET image shows diffuse adenopathy throughout the neck and body.
Biomedicines 11 00312 g007aBiomedicines 11 00312 g007b
Biomedicines 11 00312 g008 550
Figure 8. Gastrointestinal carcinoid tumor metastatic to the extra-ocular muscles. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows heterogeneously enhancing metastases to the right medial and left inferior rectus muscles (arrows). (B) Axial T1 post-contrast sequence shows a nodular appearance of the right medial metastasis (arrow).
Figure 8. Gastrointestinal carcinoid tumor metastatic to the extra-ocular muscles. (A) Coronal T1 post-contrast MRI sequence shows heterogeneously enhancing metastases to the right medial and left inferior rectus muscles (arrows). (B) Axial T1 post-contrast sequence shows a nodular appearance of the right medial metastasis (arrow).
Biomedicines 11 00312 g008
Table
Table 1. Clinical activity score (CAS) *.
Table 1. Clinical activity score (CAS) *.
1—Orbital pain
2—Pain evoked by gaze
3—Eyelid swelling
4—Eyelid redness
5—Injected conjunctiva
6—Chemosis
7—Inflamed caruncle
* based on table by Mourits et al [32].
Table
Table 2. NO SPECS classification of Graves’ Eye Disease *.
Table 2. NO SPECS classification of Graves’ Eye Disease *.
ClassificationSigns and Symptoms (Grade)
0Asymptomatic, no physical exam findings
IPhysical signs only
IIInvolvement of soft tissue
0: absent
a: minimal
b: moderate
c: marked
IIIProptosis
0: absent
a: minimal: 3 to 4 mm above normal
b: moderate: 5 to 7 mm above normal
c: marked: 8+ mm above normal
IVExtraocular muscles
0: absent
a: minimal: gaze limitations at extremes
b: moderate: motion restriction, no fixation
c: marked: globe fixation
VCornea
0: absent
a: minimal: stippling
b: moderate: ulceration
c: marked: necrosis, perforation, clouding
VIOptic nerve compression/vision loss
0: absent
a: minimal: 20/20–20/60 vision; disc pallor
b: moderate: 20/70–20/200 vision; disc pallor
c: marked: <20/200 vision; blindness
* based on table by Werner [34].
Table
Table 3. VISA (Vision, Inflammation, Strabismus, and Appearance) *.
Table 3. VISA (Vision, Inflammation, Strabismus, and Appearance) *.
• Inflamed caruncle0: absent1: present
• Injected conjunctiva0: absent1: present
• Eyelid redness0: absent1: present
• Diurnal variation of symptoms0: absent1: present
• Chemosis0: absent
1: conjunctiva behind lid
2: conjunctiva beyond lid
• Painful sensation behind globe
At rest0: absent1: present
With gaze0: absent1: present
• Eyelid edema0: absent
1: present without festoons (bags under eyes)
2: present with festoons
* based on table by Barrio-Barrio et al [35].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hutchings, K.R.; Fritzhand, S.J.; Esmaeli, B.; Koka, K.; Zhao, J.; Ahmed, S.; Debnam, J.M. Graves’ Eye Disease: Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020312

AMA Style

Hutchings KR, Fritzhand SJ, Esmaeli B, Koka K, Zhao J, Ahmed S, Debnam JM. Graves’ Eye Disease: Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(2):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hutchings, Kasen R., Seth J. Fritzhand, Bita Esmaeli, Kirthi Koka, Jiawei Zhao, Salmaan Ahmed, and James Matthew Debnam. 2023. "Graves’ Eye Disease: Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis" Biomedicines 11, no. 2: 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020312

APA Style

Hutchings, K. R., Fritzhand, S. J., Esmaeli, B., Koka, K., Zhao, J., Ahmed, S., & Debnam, J. M. (2023). Graves’ Eye Disease: Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis. Biomedicines, 11(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop