Next Article in Journal
Validation of Sputum Biomarker Immunoassays and Cytokine Expression Profiles in COPD
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Insight into MYC Action: Control of RNA Polymerase II Methylation and Transcription Termination
Previous Article in Journal
Arc Regulates Transcription of Genes for Plasticity, Excitability and Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Targeted Proteomics Approach for Screening Serum Biomarkers Observed in the Early Stage of Type I Endometrial Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/biomedicines10081948
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Colorectal Cancer: Insights from Combined Regimens with Conventional Chemotherapy to Overcome Drug-Resistance

by
Laura Ioana Gavrilas
1,*,†,
Daniel Cruceriu
2,3,†,
Andrei Mocan
4,
Felicia Loghin
5,
Doina Miere
1 and
Ovidiu Balacescu
2
1
Department of Bromatology, Hygiene, Nutrition, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 23 Marinescu Street, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Functional Genomics, Proteomics and Experimental Pathology, “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta” Oncology Institute, 34-36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, “Babes-Bolyai” University, 5-7 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 23 Marinescu Street, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
5
Department of Toxicology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 1948; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081948
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 25 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 11 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acquired drug resistance represents a major clinical problem and one of the biggest limitations of chemotherapeutic regimens in colorectal cancer. Combination regimens using standard chemotherapeutic agents, together with bioactive natural compounds derived from diet or plants, may be one of the most valuable strategies to overcome drug resistance and re-sensitize chemoresistant cells. In this review, we highlight the effect of combined regimens based on conventional chemotherapeutics in conjunction with well-tolerated plant-derived bioactive compounds, mainly curcumin, resveratrol, and EGCG, with emphasis on the molecular mechanisms associated with the acquired drug resistance.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevalence remains remarkably high in both men and women, being one of the leading causes of cancer deaths despite all efforts made in recent years in screening and treatment development [1]. Although surgery is the main treatment option for patients with likely curable CRC, depending on the disease stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may be used before or after surgery [2]. Despite these efforts, up to 30% of the patients with stage I–III and about 65% of patients with stage IV CRC will develop recurrent disease [3]. In most cases, these conventional treatments are associated with high tumor relapse and recurrence rates, especially due to the acquired drug resistance [4]. Therefore, the CRC-acquired drug resistance represents a major clinical issue and the most significant limitation of chemotherapeutic regimens available nowadays, placing more emphasis on the need for novel, safe, and more effective approaches.
The therapeutic potential of bioactive natural compounds in different types of cancers, including breast cancer [5], prostate cancer [6], glioblastoma [7], and CRC [8], among others, especially in combination with other conventional chemotherapeutic agents, has been widely investigated, with mainly positive outcomes. Combination regimens using standard chemotherapeutic agents and bioactive natural compounds derived from food or plants may be one of the most valuable strategies to overcome drug resistance. Combination regimens refer to the simultaneous administration of a conventional drug with one natural agent or a mixture of those, as well as the co-treatment of two or more natural compounds [9,10,11]. The available research indicates that plant-derived bioactive products can increase drug efficacy at a lower dose, thus, reducing dosage toxicity [10,11]. In addition, they can re-sensitize chemoresistant cells by multiple molecular mechanisms representing an emerging area of cancer research. The plant-derived compounds most studied in relation to their capacity to potentiate other conventional chemotherapeutic drugs in CRC, especially by blocking and/or reversing the acquired drug resistance mechanisms, are curcumin (diferuloylmethane), resveratrol (3,4’,5-trihydroxystilbene), and (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). Due to the extensive data supporting curcumin, resveratrol, and EGCG efficacy in re-sensitizing chemoresistant cells, as well as the promise revealed by the latest research on new formulations with increased bioavailability, these natural compounds are regarded as leading candidates to counteract acquired drug-resistance in the near future in clinical practice.
Curcumin represents the most important polyphenolic active ingredient derived from turmeric (the rhizomes of Curcuma longa). Extensive research has highlighted the potential of curcumin in the prevention and therapy of colorectal cancer due to its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticarcinogenic properties. Recent studies have emphasized that combining conventional chemotherapeutic agents and curcumin may effectively overcome drug resistance [11,12]. Curcumin has been confirmed as safe and non-toxic in humans, when administered at doses up to 10 g/day [13]. However, curcumin undergoes extensive metabolism in the liver and demonstrates poor bioavailability, thus accounting as a main problem towards its chemosensitizing potential [14]. Approaches to enhance curcumin bioavailability includes nano-encapsulation [15] or association with piperine, which act as a bio-enhancers that considerably improve the absorption of curcumin by up to 2000-fold [16].
Resveratrol is a phytoalexin found in grapes skin, wine, berries, and other plant sources, mainly produced in response to bacterial or fungi infections as a defense mechanism [17,18]. It is a well-studied bioactive dietary compound known to modulate several cancer-related molecular pathways, with promising applications as an adjuvant in cancer management. Accumulating evidence has pointed out the efficacy of resveratrol as a chemosensitizer in multiple cancer types, including CRC [10,12]. Resveratrol is easily absorbed and transformed, primarily into sulfo- and glucuro-conjugates that are excreted in the urine. Resveratrol appears to be well tolerated, and no overt toxicity in humans has been reported [19]. However, these findings are still sporadic, and many areas demand more research and clarity. Specifically, the precise make-up of the endogenous metabolites, their biological properties, as well as the nature of interaction with other drugs or bioactive dietary components.
EGCG represents the most valuable green tea polyphenol with growth inhibitory properties against many tumors, including CRC [20]. It has been proposed that EGCG can enhance drug sensitivity in various cancers, such as gastric cancer [21], hepatocellular carcinoma [22], and CRC [23,24]. In addition, it is widely recognized as an important chemopreventive agent, as well as a modulator of apoptosis, angiogenesis, or other cancer-related biological processes [20]. Research advances in bioavailability studies involving absorption and metabolic biotransformation of tea catechins reported that the observed discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo investigations is mostly due to the low bioavailability of green tea catechins. Stability and absorption rate, as well as efflux, influence their bioavailability. However, molecular modification, drug delivery systems based on nanostructures, and co-administration with some other bioactive ingredients can all improve the bioavailability of catechins [25]. Despite the health beneficial effects reported in numerous studies, food supplements containing green tea catechins should be administered with caution as exposure to green tea extracts at and above 800 mg EGCG/day in intervention studies causes elevated serum transaminases, which is indicative of liver injury [26].
Therefore, in the present paper, we analyze how the combination of conventional chemotherapeutics with bioactive dietary compounds, mainly curcumin, resveratrol, and EGCG, may contribute to a better response of CRC by reversing epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), re-sensitizing chemoresistant cells, and enhancing the apoptosis. In this regard, we conducted a piece of literature research on Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar and selected publications between January 2000 and April 2022, using the search terms “colorectal cancer”, “drug resistance”, “chemotherapy resistance”, “combination therapy”, “combinatorial treatment”, “synergistic effect” “bioactive dietary compounds”, ”natural compounds” “chemosensitization”, “curcumin”, “resveratrol”, “epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)” individually or in combination. We included original research and review articles on both animals and humans. The non-English publications were excluded.

2. Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Therapeutic Approach

An active lifestyle, together with healthy eating patterns and particular natural components from food, can prevent, delay, and even reverse chronic diseases, especially those associated with cancer [27,28,29,30]. Functional foods, such as fish-rich in ώ-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids, algae, fiber-rich foods or medicinal mushrooms, as well as bioactive dietary compounds, such as curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), quercetin, α-mangostin, and vitamin D, have been reported to modulate important pathways involved in cancer prevention and treatment [7,8,10,11].
Current epidemiologic data indicate that CRC continues to be the third most diagnosed type of cancer but second in terms of mortality, with an estimated incidence of 1.9 million new cases and 935,000 deaths in 2020 [1]. CRC is recognized as a hallmark of socioeconomic improvement, although in most developed regions, rates have decreased over the past decades due to improved screening programs and advanced treatment approaches. Nonetheless, its incidence showed a steadily rising pattern in developing countries in conjunction with changes in environmental factors, including poor dietary choices, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption, all confirmed as critical determinants of CRC risk.
Since it’s a lifestyle-related cancer, dietary patterns play an essential role in developing CRC. As support in this regard, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified a high intake of processed meat as carcinogenic to humans [31]. Additional dietary risk factors include common patterns of a Western diet, such as high intakes of red meat, refined carbohydrates (white pasta, refined rice, or white flour), sweets and sugar-sweetened beverages. In contrast, consumption of vegetables, legumes, and fruits rich in bioactive dietary components, as well as options of fiber-rich foods and fish are negatively associated with CRC risk and sustain a normal weight status and a healthy gut microbiota [32,33,34]. In addition to dietary intake, regular exercise is one of the most important lifestyle factors for CRC prevention [35].
Conventional strategies for colorectal cancer treatment include surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. The most common therapeutic approach is surgery with chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiotherapy, given before or after surgery to most patients, depending on the disease stage [2]. Therapeutic regimens include one or more chemotherapeutic agents, such as platinum derivates (oxaliplatin, cisplatin), antimetabolites (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine), topoisomerase inhibitors (irinotecan), and more recently the targeted therapies with bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, chosen based on the molecular profile of the patient [2,36,37]. The first line approach in advanced CRC includes 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid alone or combined with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), while irinotecan represents a first-line therapeutic approach for metastatic colorectal cancer alone or combined with 5-FU [38]. The main cause of treatment failure and the need of switching between several chemotherapeutic regimens is mainly attributed to the development of drug resistance in tumor cells.

3. Mechanisms of Acquired Drug Resistance in CRC

Chemotherapeutic regimens used for CRC treatment lead to severe adverse effects that alter the quality of life of cancer patients, impair the treatment’s course and the treatment outcome, leading to malnourishment and depression [39]. However, the biggest limitation of systemic chemotherapeutic regimens available at the moment is the inability to prevent acquired drug resistance, with many patients experiencing relapsed/recurrent disease refractory to a variety of drugs, thus leaving metastatic patients with no treatment options [4]. Two types of drug resistance, baseline and acquired, are responsible for chemoresistance and treatment failure. [40,41]. The molecular mechanisms associated with acquired drug resistance, occurring during treatment, are related to increased rates of drug efflux, evasion of apoptosis, induction of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and persistence of cancer stem cells [41,42]. The activation of these mechanisms is mainly mediated by mutations, alterations, alternative splicing, and post-translational modifications of the genes and proteins that belong to them.
Several proteins involved in drug efflux belonging to ABC family transporters: ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein-Pgp), ABCC1 (MDR-associated protein 1-MRP1), and ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein-BCRP) are increased in colon cancer. These transporter proteins, by efflux the drugs outside the cancer cells, decrease the intracellular concentration of the drug and, therefore, their therapeutic effects [41,43]. Consequently, one practical approach to increase the drug efficacy is to maintain the intracellular concentration of the drug by inhibiting these proteins and re-sensitize resistant cells by using bioactive natural compounds.
EMT, another biological mechanism associated with chemoresistance, implies the transformation of epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells in specific pathological circumstances and represents the first step in tumor invasion and metastasis [4]. The process of EMT involves molecular reprogramming of the cells, including loss of cell adhesion molecules, such as E-cadherin, which changes the epithelial cell morphology, as well as overexpression of N-cadherin, osteopontin, Snail1, Snail2 (slug) and other interstitial proteins, thus, facilitating tumor cells to obtain higher potential with respect to migration, invasion, anti-apoptotic potential, and the degradation of extracellular matrix [4,44]. Therefore, EMT is a key event during the early stages of invasion and metastasis and on the onset of drug resistance.
Chemoresistance is also characterized by the ability of cancer cells to survive by suppressing cell death. A high grade of the alteration of cancer cell death-related pathways, resulting in decreased cell death rates, appear during the malignant transformation of colonic tissues into CRC [4]. In cases of apoptosis, the most documented alterations concern the Bcl-2 family and caspase genes [4]. Finally, yet importantly, the formation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is a well-documented hallmark of chemoresistance [45]. CSCs, which represent a small subpopulation of self-renewal epithelial cancer cells, can be induced from differentiated cancer cells as a response from therapeutic pressures. CSCs are generally characterized by the expression of surface markers associated with stem cells, such as CD133, CD44, CD90 [45,46].
Although, tumors develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs either by decreasing the intratumor level of the drug or by genetic and epigenetic modifications within the cancer cells, which can alter apoptosis mechanisms and favor EMT, the resistance mechanisms are, of course, unique to each treatment. Specifically, nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a key regulator of cellular defense against oxidative and electrophilic stresses, is considered significant in 5-FU resistance [47]. In addition, irinotecan administration modulates the expression and/or the activation of multiple proteins involved in the EGFR-MAPK7 [48], NFkB8 [49], and PI3K-AKT/mTOR9 [50] signaling pathways. These irinotecan-triggered gene expression alterations are actually promoting cell survival, proliferation, and invasiveness, thus being important contributors in the development of irinotecan resistance.

4. Combined Approaches in CRC Treatment Using Bioactive Natural Compounds

Combination regimens account for the simultaneous targeting of many cancer pathways having pleiotropic effects, allowing the reduction in the development of tumor drug resistance, as well as re-sensitizing chemoresistant cells. In most cases, plant-derived bioactive components additionally target multiple apoptotic mechanisms being much more effective than the use of single drug treatment.
The main mechanisms by which CRC tumor cells acquire drug resistance in return to systemic chemotherapy, along with the most important combinatory therapies involving a plant-derived compound that might re-sensitize the cancer cells are presented in Figure 1.

5. 5-FU

The most extensively used chemotherapeutic agent in colorectal cancer regimens is represented by 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). The fluoropyrimidine analogue, 5-FU, is an antimetabolite drug with anticancer activity inhibiting the thymidylate synthase (TS) during DNA replication. Despite multiple advantages, the clinical use of 5-FU is limited due to the development of drug resistance [51].
He and colleagues confirmed that curcumin can enhance the sensitivity of HCT-8 colorectal cancer cells to 5-FU by down-regulating HSP-27 and P-gp protein, a well-known MDR-protein from the ABC family, both correlated with MDR [52]. In addition, another study demonstrated that curcumin can boost the anticancer activity of the 5-FU due to the suppression of MDR1. ROS induction mediated this action mechanism through modulation of the miR-27a-ZBTB10-Sp-axis [53]. Moreover, curcumin could inhibit proliferation and enhance apoptosis in 5-FU-resistant colorectal cell lines modulating a group of EMT-suppressive miRNAs [54]. The same authors further demonstrated that treatment with curcumin sensitized 5-FU to promote tumor growth inhibition in vivo in a xenograft mouse model [54]. Curcumin has been included in phase I and phase II clinical trials with FOLFOX showing anti-proliferative effects, as well as proving safe and tolerable adjunct to FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer at doses up to 2 g daily [55,56].
In DLD-1 and SW480 colorectal cancer cell lines, EGCG associated with 5-FU resulted in synergistic growth suppression, as showed by the combination index value of less than 1.0 [24]. More recently, Xiaoquin et al. demonstrated that EGCG enhanced the chemo-sensitivity of 5-FU at low doses in HCT-116 and DLD1 CRC cells by inhibiting cancer proliferation, targeting apoptosis and DNA damage [23]. The underlying mechanism is associated with the overexpression of miR-155-5p, which in turn strongly suppresses target gene MDR1 expression, blocking the efflux of 5-FU, ultimately leading to cancer cell apoptosis.
A recent research conducted by Chung and colleagues [57] demonstrated the pleiotropic potential of the combined treatment with resveratrol and 5-FU in CRC. The combination regimen enhanced the antiproliferative potential of 5-FU in colorectal cancer by targeting cell cycle arrest in S-phase and augmented 5-FU pro-apoptotic effect by simultaneously inhibiting Akt and STAT3 signaling pathways. Furthermore, the combination of the two agents repressed EMT transition, targeting expression levels of slug and vimentin, both being downregulated following the combinatorial treatment. Remarkably, the combined approach with resveratrol and 5-FU-inhibited STAT3, a well-known transcription factor, from binding with the promoter region of hTERT gene, demonstrating the anti-telomerase activity of the regimen. Likewise, in HT-29 and SW-620 CRC cell lines, the treatment regimen based on 5-FU, combined with resveratrol, resulted in enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxides, which was linked to the inhibition of oncogenic proteins AKT and STAT3 [58]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated in a recent study that resveratrol can chemosensitize 5-FU-resistant CRC cells in a tumor microenvironment suppressing the pro-carcinogenic and metastatic potential of tumor necrosis factor-β (TNF-β). It was noteworthy that resveratrol treatment strongly modulated EMT factors, showing significant suppression of vimentin and slug while increasing E-cadherin [59].
As summarized in Table 1, numerous studies have highlighted the potential of curcumin and other naturally derived compounds to enhance the drug response rates and overcome the drug resistance of most of the chemotherapeutic agents used in CRC treatment, including curcumin.

6. Platinum Compounds

The platinum-based compounds, such as cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and carboplatin, have been widely used in oncology for the last 40 years in treating several cancers, including bladder, ovarian, testicular, lung, head and neck, and colorectal cancer. The mechanism of action of most platinum-based drugs involves covalent binding to purine DNA bases leading to the formation of DNA adducts, thereby inhibiting DNA replication and transcription finally leading to apoptotic cell death [77,78]. The major limitations for the use of these chemotherapeutic agents are the frequent onset of drug resistance and the common side effects associated with toxicity [78]. The use of naturally derived compounds together with platinum-derived agents presents synergic effects increasing the efficiency of the conventional treatment, which may lead to dose reduction, as well as the decline in the adverse effects of chemotherapy.

6.1. Cisplatin

Cisplatin is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic drugs for colon cancer treatment. However, the unavoidable toxicity, as well as the development of acquired resistance severely limited its clinical applicability. In combination with cisplatin, EGCG enhanced the effect of cisplatin-induced autophagy in DLD-1 and HT-29 colorectal cancer cells, as characterized by the accumulation of LC3-II protein, improving the increase in acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs), as well as the formation of autophagosome [60].

6.2. Oxaliplatin

Oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum drug, which has received more recently its approval for metastatic CRC treatment [79], is broadly used alone or in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin in FOLFOX regimens.
Curcumin has been shown to increase the chemotherapeutic potential of oxaliplatin, to overcome chemoresistance while improving the side effect profile of the oxaliplatin regimens [80]. The combined regimen with curcumin and oxaliplatin had synergistic potential in cell lines with acquired resistance to oxaliplatin, leading to the reversion of their resistant phenotype [61]. Curcumin inhibited the oxaliplatin-induced activation of NF-κB and decreases the expression of NF-κB signaling cascade, including downregulation of CXCL8, CXCL1, and CXCL2. Furthermore, CXCL8 and CXCL1 gene silencing re-sensitized oxaliplatin-resistant cells through the inhibition of the Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway [61]. Another study reported that HCT-116 and HT-29 CRC cells treated with FOLFOX for 48 h resulted in 60–70% overall survival and the activation of both IGF-1R, as well as EGFR. The addition of curcumin for another 48 h resulted in increased growth inhibition and concomitant reduction of EGFR, HER-2, IGF-R1, and Akt, as well as downregulation of COX-2 and cyclin-D1 [81]. Furthermore, difluorinated curcumin, a novel curcumin analog, has been shown to re-sensitize drug-resistant mice modulating the miR-21-PTEN-Akt axis [63].
The role of stem cells (CSCs), a small sub-population of self-renewal epithelial cancer cells, in chemoresistance is well-documented [45]. The addition of curcumin to FOLFOX-surviving colorectal cancer cells resulted in a significant reduction in CSCs, as evidenced by the downregulation of CD44, CD166, and EGFR, as well as by CSCs ability to form anchorage-dependent colonies [82]. Moreover, curcumin-inhibited EMT via regulation of TGF-β/Smad2/3 signaling cascade indicated that curcumin could reverse oxaliplatin-resistance in CRC. The same study confirmed the result in vivo using HCT116/OXA xenograft mice, demonstrating that both the tumor volumes and weights and Smad2/3 levels were reduced when animals were treated with the combined regimens compared with those administered with oxaliplatin alone [62]. Consistent with these results, curcumin formulating with phosphatidylcholine (Meriva) showed the enhanced efficacy of oxaliplatin in a combined regimen both in vitro and in vivo [83].
The research conducted by Kaminski et al. evaluated the implication of resveratrol in improving the chemotherapeutic effect of oxaliplatin in the Caco-2 colon cancer cell line, as well as its likely role in the inflammatory response [64]. The combined treatment was able to reduce cell growth synergistically via caspase-3 activation, PARP breakage, and mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization. Furthermore, the combined treatment was effective in shaping an immune response, inhibiting the macrophages from becoming immunosuppressive. In another study, resveratrol sensitized CRC cells to oxaliplatin through up regulating the tumor suppressing microRNA, miR-34c, which silenced its target gene KITLG [65]. Furthermore, to determine the regimen’s in vivo effect, the same authors used a xenograft model in BALB/c athymic nude mice. The xenograft experiments showed that exposure to either resveratrol or oxaliplatin suppressed tumor growth, but the efficacy was evidently augmented when the two agents were used together. Moreover, a study conducted on HCT116 colon cancer cell line showed that resveratrol can reverse oxaliplatin-induced survivin suppression in HCT116 cells, restoring survivin expression at both mRNA and protein level, and pled for caution when using resveratrol with oxaliplatin in clinical practice [66]. Survivin, one of the smallest members of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) is related with poor prognosis and chemoresistance, has anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenic properties, and it is known to be a target of oxaliplatin treatment in CRC [66,84].
Other promising natural compounds have been proposed in combination with oxaliplatin, such as betulinic acid, alanolactone, or piperlongumine, with promising results but yet only scarce research available. In oxaliplatin-resistant CRC cells treated with betulinic acid, Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic protein was down-regulated, whereas pro-apoptotic Bad was up-regulated [67]. Furthermore, alantolactone, a sesquiterpene lactone extracted from the roots of Inula helenium L., a Chinese herbal remedy, enhanced the effect of oxaliplatin on colorectal cancer HCT-116 cells through induction of ROS, activation of JNK and p38 MAPK apoptotic pathways [68]. Another novel therapeutic approach using oxaliplatin and piperlongumine, a natural product derived from the Piper longum Linn plant, was tested. Piperlongumine sensitized CRC cells to oxaliplatin by inducing ROS-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in CRC. Moreover, in vitro evidence was strongly supported by xenograft experiments in mice models [69].

7. Irinotecan

Irinotecan, a semisynthetic analog of camptothecin, is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor able of interfering with DNA replication and transcription. In its active, metabolized form (SN-38), irinotecan stabilizes the intermediate cleavage complexes formed between topoisomerase I and the single strand of DNA, preventing DNA ligation, and so enhancing cell death. In clinical practice, irinotecan represents a first-line therapeutic approach for advanced stages of colorectal cancer associated with invasion and metastasis [85]. Even though the addition of irinotecan to the standard regimens used for treating advanced metastatic CRC significantly improved the therapeutic outcomes [86], the response rate to these regimens is only in the range of 30–50% [87]. The primary reason for treatment failure is thought to be the tumor’s acquired drug resistance, a phenomenon that occurs in 90% of the patients with metastatic CRC [86]. Therefore, acquired resistance to irinotecan in patients with advanced CRC is still a major clinical issue. Only a limited number of studies have evaluated the interaction of bioactive dietary components with irinotecan and show promising results.
Curcumin and irinotecan are more effective at decreasing cell viability and increasing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest when administered simultaneously, in comparison to the single drug treatments. The observed effects of curcumin were via endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway, as well as through ROS generation [70]. In terms of re-sensitizing chemoresistant cells, promising data are available. Su et al. indicated that curcumin can efficiently attenuate chemoresistance of CRC cells by inducing apoptosis in an irinotecan-resistant cell line by significantly altering the expression levels of CSC identification markers. Moreover, curcumin up-regulated Bax pro-apoptotic protein expression, while down-regulating the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 [71]. Likewise, Zhang et al. demonstrated that curcumin is an effective chemosensitizing agent able to reverse EMT in colorectal cancer. In irinotecan-resistant cells (LoVo/CPT-11R) treated with curcumin, E-cadherin expression was upregulated, whereas vimentin and N-cadherin expressions were downregulated [72]. In addition to the re-sensitizing potential, Ouyang et al. demonstrated that curcumin exerts a protective effect against irinotecan-induced intestinal mucosal injury mediated by the inhibition of NF-κB activation [73].
A recent study evaluated the combined approach with EGCG and irinotecan on migration, invasion, DNA damage, cell cycle, and autophagy of CRC cells. The authors demonstrated that the combination treatment had a stronger inhibitory effect than either agent alone and was able to prevent tumor cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, EGCG and irinotecan can synergistically inhibit the activity of topoisomerase I, leading to more extensive DNA damage [74].

8. Doxorubicin

Doxorubicin is a chemotherapy medication routinely used in the treatment of several cancers, including CRC regimens. It acts as a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor, thus impairing DNA transcription and replication. However, it is associated with cardiac side effects, the most common drawback being the development of heart failure [88]. In the attempt of finding strategies for lowering the total dose administered, the combined treatment with resveratrol was proposed. The cotreatment of resveratrol and doxorubicin up-regulated pro-apoptotic gene Bax in colorectal HCT116 cell line enhancing apoptosis, while limiting the efflux of the drug via down-regulation of ABCB1 member of ABC proteins, and thus increases the intracellular concentration of the drug, as well as its therapeutic effect [75]. Likewise, in Caco-2-resistant colorectal cancer cells, the resveratrol-mediated inhibition of ABC-transporters efflux functions by altering mRNA levels of ABCB1/MDR1, MRP1, and BCRP [76]. In addition, the use of resveratrol at very low concentrations, in combination with doxorubicin, resulted in a dose reduction for doxorubicin while maintaining the same cytotoxic effect, thus overcoming the most important challenge associated with the administration of doxorubicin.

9. Conclusions and Further Perspectives

Plant-derived bioactive compounds represent strong candidates in order to overcome the increasing prevalence of acquired drug-resistance in cancer therapy. When administered in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents, they often yield augmented antitumor effects and are able to block and/or reverse the acquired drug-resistance mechanisms. Considering the research papers presented in this review (summarized in Table 1), bioactive dietary components can enhance the chemotherapeutic effect of the drugs and reduce chemoresistance by decreasing efflux proteins belonging to ABC family transporters, promoting apoptotic cell death, as well as reversing EMT. One of the major problems in the clinical translation is related to the limited bioavailability of most of the compounds, such as curcumin or resveratrol, since both are fast metabolized and eliminated by the body, making the maintenance of the therapeutically appropriate concentration in the circulation challenging. The advance of nanotechnology opens numerous possibilities for improving the therapeutic effects of these plant-derived bioactive compounds. By lowering the particle size, altering the surface, and entrapping the compound with various nanocarriers, a well-formulated nano approach increases bioavailability and bioactivity as reported in extensive detail in recent reviews in the case of curcumin [89,90], resveratrol [91] or EGCG [92]. As further knowledge is gained in the formulation of novel drug delivery systems, is essential that these natural compounds undergo clinical evaluation through a large number of clinical trials to validate the effectiveness observed in vitro, as well as in animal models. In addition, it is necessary to establish the safety profile of each compound when administered in cancer patients. Despite the hurdles that lie ahead, the potential of these plant-derived bioactive components is enormous, and it is well worth the collaborative effort of the scientific community for the benefit of oncological patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.I.G., D.C. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.I.G., D.C. and D.M.; writing—review and editing O.B. and F.L.; supervision, L.I.G. and O.B.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-0468, within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gelibter, A.J.; Caponnetto, S.; Urbano, F.; Emiliani, A.; Scagnoli, S.; Sirgiovanni, G.; Napoli, V.M.; Cortesi, E. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Colon Cancer: When, How and How Long? Surg. Oncol. 2019, 30, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Van der Stok, E.P.; Verhoef, C.; Grunhagen, D.J. Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Surgery Alone in High-Risk Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: The CHARISMA Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, TPS790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Skarkova, V.; Kralova, V.; Vitovcova, B.; Rudolf, E. Selected Aspects of Chemoresistance Mechanisms in Colorectal Carcinoma—A Focus on Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition, Autophagy, and Apoptosis. Cells 2019, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Muniraj, N.; Siddharth, S.; Sharma, D. Bioactive Compounds: Multi-Targeting Silver Bullets for Preventing and Treating Breast Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lodi, A.; Saha, A.; Lu, X.; Wang, B.; Sentandreu, E.; Collins, M.; Kolonin, M.G.; DiGiovanni, J.; Tiziani, S. Combinatorial Treatment with Natural Compounds in Prostate Cancer Inhibits Prostate Tumor Growth and Leads to Key Modulations of Cancer Cell Metabolism. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2017, 1, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rotondo, R.; Ragucci, S.; Castaldo, S.; Landi, N.; Oliva, M.A.; Pedone, P.V.; Di Maro, A.; Arcella, A. Ageritin—The Ribotoxin-like Protein from Poplar Mushroom (Cyclocybe aegerita) Sensitizes Primary Glioblastoma Cells to Conventional Temozolomide Chemotherapy. Molecules 2022, 27, 2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gavrilas, L.; Ionescu, C.; Tudoran, O.; Lisencu, C.; Balacescu, O.; Miere, D. The Role of Bioactive Dietary Components in Modulating miRNA Expression in Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients 2016, 8, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gavrilas, L.I.; Cruceriu, D.; Ionescu, C.; Miere, D.; Balacescu, O. Pro-Apoptotic Genes as New Targets for Single and Combinatorial Treatments with Resveratrol and Curcumin in Colorectal Cancer. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 3717–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cocetta, V.; Quagliariello, V.; Fiorica, F.; Berretta, M.; Montopoli, M. Resveratrol as Chemosensitizer Agent: State of Art and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wei, Y.; Yang, P.; Cao, S.; Zhao, L. The Combination of Curcumin and 5-Fluorouracil in Cancer Therapy. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2018, 41, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Redondo-Blanco, S.; Fernández, J.; Gutiérrez-del-Río, I.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. New Insights toward Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Using Natural Bioactive Compounds. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chainani-Wu, N. Safety and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Curcumin: A Component of Tumeric (Curcuma longa). J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2003, 9, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anand, P.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Newman, R.A.; Aggarwal, B.B. Bioavailability of Curcumin: Problems and Promises. Mol. Pharm. 2007, 4, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anitha, A.; Sreeranganathan, M.; Chennazhi, K.P.; Lakshmanan, V.K.; Jayakumar, R. In Vitro Combinatorial Anticancer Effects of 5-Fluorouracil and Curcumin Loaded N,O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Nanoparticles toward Colon Cancer and in Vivo Pharmacokinetic Studies. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 88, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, H.K. The Effects of Black Pepper on the Intestinal Absorption and Hepatic Metabolism of Drugs. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2011, 7, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kotecha, R.; Takami, A.; Espinoza, J.L. Dietary Phytochemicals and Cancer Chemoprevention: A Review of the Clinical Evidence. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 52517–52529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Banc, R.; Loghin, F.; Miere, D.; Ranga, F.; Socaciu, C. Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Red, Rosé and White Wines Originating from Romanian Grape Cultivars. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2020, 48, 716–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cottart, C.H.; Nivet-Antoine, V.; Laguillier-Morizot, C.; Beaudeux, J.L. Resveratrol Bioavailability and Toxicity in Humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Shao, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, W.; Lu, X.; et al. A Review on Anti-Cancer Effect of Green Tea Catechins. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 74, 104172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, H.; Zeng, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ruan, Q.; Wang, J.; Cui, S.; Yang, D. Reversal of 5-Fluorouracil Resistance by EGCG Is Mediate by Inactivation of TFAP2A/VEGF Signaling Pathway and down-Regulation of MDR-1 and P-Gp Expression in Gastric Cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 82842–82853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, X.W.; Wang, X.L.; Cao, L.Q.; Jiang, X.F.; Peng, H.P.; Lin, S.M.; Xue, P.; Chen, D. Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Enhances 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Cell Growth Inhibition of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Hepatol. Res. 2012, 42, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. La, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, Y. (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) Enhances the Sensitivity of Colorectal Cancer Cells to 5-FU by Inhibiting GRP78/NF-ΚB/MiR-155-5p/MDR1 Pathway. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2510–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumazaki, M.; Noguchi, S.; Yasui, Y.; Iwasaki, J.; Shinohara, H.; Yamada, N.; Akao, Y. Anti-Cancer Effects of Naturally Occurring Compounds through Modulation of Signal Transduction and MiRNA Expression in Human Colon Cancer Cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cai, Z.Y.; Li, X.M.; Liang, J.P.; Xiang, L.P.; Wang, K.R.; Shi, Y.L.; Yang, R.; Shi, M.; Ye, J.H.; Lu, J.L.; et al. Bioavailability of Tea Catechins and Its Improvement. Molecules 2018, 23, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Younes, M.; Aggett, P.; Aguilar, F.; Crebelli, R.; Dusemund, B.; Filipič, M.; Frutos, M.J.; Galtier, P.; Gott, D.; Gundert-Remy, U.; et al. Scientific Opinion on the Safety of Green Tea Catechins. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05239. [Google Scholar]
  27. Al Shamsi, M.; Amin, A.; Adeghate, E. Effect of Vitamin C on Liver and Kidney Functions in Normal and Diabetic Rats. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1084, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al Shamsi, M.; Amin, A.; Adeghate, E. Vitamin E Ameliorates Some Biochemical Parameters in Normal and Diabetic Rats. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1084, 411–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Colorectal Cancer; Colorectal Cancer Report, World Cancer Research Fund. 2017. Available online: https://www.wcrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Colorectal-cancer-report.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  30. Hughes, L.A.E.; Simons, C.C.J.M.; van den Brandt, P.A.; van Engeland, M.; Weijenberg, M.P. Lifestyle, Diet and Colorectal Cancer Risk According to (Epi)Genetic Instability: Current Evidence and Future Directions of Molecular Pathological Epidemiology. Curr. Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2017, 13, 455–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer. Monographs Evaluate Consumption of Red Meat and Processed Meat. 2015. Available online: https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr240_E.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  32. Gavrilaș, L.I.; Ionescu, C.; Bălăcescu, O.; Mureșan, D.; Revnic, C.; Filip, L.; Miere, D. Intake of Plant Based Foods and Colorectal Cancer. A Case- Control Study in Romania. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gavrilas, L.I.; Ionescu, C.; Balacescu, O.; Ciobarca, D.; Filip, L.; Boboia, A.; Miere, D. Foods and Food Groups Associated with Colorectal Cancer: A Case-Control Study. Farmacia 2018, 66, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ciobârcă, D.; Cătoi, A.F.; Copăescu, C.; Miere, D.; Crișan, G. Bariatric Surgery in Obesity: Effects on Gut Microbiota and Micronutrient Status. Nutrients 2020, 12, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gavrilaș, L.I.; Ionescu, C.; Bălăcescu, O.; Cruceriu, D.; Filip, L.; Miere, D. Physical Activity in Colorectal Cancer. Palestrica Third Millenn.-Civiliz. Sport 2018, 19, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Giuliani, J.; Bonetti, A. First-Line Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Integrating Clinical Benefit with the Costs of Drugs. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2018, 33, 1505–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matos, I.; Noguerido, A.; Ros, J.; Mulet, N.; Argilés, G.; Elez, É.; Tabernero, J. Triple-Drug Chemotherapy Regimens in Combination with an Anti-EGFR Agent in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-Prospects from Phase II Clinical Trials. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2019, 28, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McQuade, R.M.; Stojanovska, V.; Bornstein, J.C.; Nurgali, K. Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy: The Evolution of Treatment and New Approaches. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 1537–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ramasubbu, S.K.; Pasricha, R.K.; Nath, U.K.; Rawat, V.S.; Das, B. Quality of Life and Factors Affecting It in Adult Cancer Patients Undergoing Cancer Chemotherapy in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cancer Rep. 2021, 4, e1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bharti, A.C.; Vishnoi, K.; Singh, S.M.; Aggarwal, B.B. Pathways Linked to Cancer Chemoresistance and Their Targeting by Nutraceuticals. In Cancer Sensitizing Agents for Chemotherapy, Role of Nutraceuticals in Cancer Chemosensitization, 1st ed.; Bharti, A.C., Aggarwal, B.B., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 2, pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hu, T.; Li, Z.; Gao, C.Y.; Cho, C.H. Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Colon Cancer and Its Therapeutic Strategies. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 6876–6889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Du, B.; Shim, J.S. Targeting Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) to Overcome Drug Resistance in Cancer. Molecules 2016, 21, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hamed, A.R.; Abdel-Azim, N.S.; Shams, K.A.; Hammouda, F.M. Targeting Multidrug Resistance in Cancer by Natural Chemosensitizers. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sipos, F.; Galamb, O. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal and Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transitions in the Colon. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rahman, M.; Deleyrolle, L.; Vedam-Mai, V.; Azari, H.; Abd-El-Barr, M.; Reynolds, B.A. The Cancer Stem Cell Hypothesis: Failures and Pitfalls. Neurosurgery 2011, 68, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ayob, A.Z.; Ramasamy, T.S. Cancer Stem Cells as Key Drivers of Tumour Progression. J. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 25, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gong, J.; Xu, H. Current Perspectives on the Role of Nrf2 in 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Colorectal Cancer. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 2297–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Makondi, P.T.; Chu, C.M.; Wei, P.L.; Chang, Y.J. Prediction of Novel Target Genes and Pathways Involved in Irinotecan-Resistant Colorectal Cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, M.C.; Lee, N.H.; Hsu, H.H.; Ho, T.J.; Tu, C.C.; Chen, R.J.; Lin, Y.M.; Viswanadha, V.P.; Kuo, W.W.; Huang, C.Y. Inhibition of NF-ΚB and Metastasis in Irinotecan (CPT-11)-Resistant LoVo Colon Cancer Cells by Thymoquinone via JNK and P38. Environ. Toxicol. 2017, 32, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tosi, D.; Pérez-Gracia, E.; Atis, S.; Vié, N.; Combès, E.; Gabanou, M.; Larbouret, C.; Jarlier, M.; Mollevi, C.; Torro, A.; et al. Rational Development of Synergistic Combinations of Chemotherapy and Molecular Targeted Agents for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vodenkova, S.; Buchler, T.; Cervena, K.; Veskrnova, V.; Vodicka, P.; Vymetalkova, V. 5-Fluorouracil and Other Fluoropyrimidines in Colorectal Cancer: Past, Present and Future. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 206, 107447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, W.T.; Zhu, Y.H.; Zhang, T.; Abulimiti, P.; Zeng, F.Y.; Zhang, L.P.; Luo, L.J.; Xie, X.M.; Zhang, H.L. Curcumin Reverses 5-Fluorouracil Resistance by Promoting Human Colon Cancer HCT-8/5-FU Cell Apoptosis and Down-Regulating Heat Shock Protein 27 and P-Glycoprotein. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2019, 25, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Noratto, G.D.; Jutooru, I.; Safe, S.; Angel-morales, G. The Drug Resistance Suppression Induced by Curcuminoids in Colon Cancer SW-480 Cells Is Mediated by Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced Disruption of the MicroRNA-27a-ZBTB10-Sp Axis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 1638–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Toden, S.; Okugawa, Y.; Jascur, T.; Wodarz, D.; Komarova, N.L.; Buhrmann, C.; Shakibaei, M.; Richard Boland, C.; Goel, A. Curcumin Mediates Chemosensitization to 5-Fluorouracil through MiRNA-Induced Suppression of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Chemoresistant Colorectal Cancer. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Howells, L.M.; Iwuji, C.O.O.; Irving, G.R.B.; Barber, S.; Walter, H.; Sidat, Z.; Griffin-Teall, N.; Singh, R.; Foreman, N.; Patel, S.R.; et al. Curcumin Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Randomized Phase IIa Trial. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. James, M.I.; Iwuji, C.; Irving, G.; Karmokar, A.; Higgins, J.A.; Griffin-Teal, N.; Thomas, A.; Greaves, P.; Cai, H.; Patel, S.R.; et al. Curcumin Inhibits Cancer Stem Cell Phenotypes in Ex Vivo Models of Colorectal Liver Metastases, and Is Clinically Safe and Tolerable in Combination with FOLFOX Chemotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2015, 364, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chung, S.S.; Dutta, P.; Austin, D.; Wang, P.; Awad, A.; Vadgama, J.V. Combination of Resveratrol and 5-Flurouracil Enhanced Anti-Telomerase Activity and Apoptosis by Inhibiting STAT3 and Akt Signaling Pathways in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 32943–32957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Santandreu, F.M.; Valle, A.; Oliver, J.; Roca, P. Resveratrol Potentiates the Cytotoxic Oxidative Stress Induced by Chemotherapy in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 28, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Buhrmann, C.; Yazdi, M.; Popper, B.; Shayan, P.; Goel, A.; Aggarwal, B.; Shakibaei, M. Resveratrol Chemosensitizes TNF-β-Induced Survival of 5-FU-Treated Colorectal Cancer Cells. Nutrients 2018, 10, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hu, F.; Wei, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, B.; Fang, Y.; Xiong, B. EGCG Synergizes the Therapeutic Effect of Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin through Autophagic Pathway in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 128, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ruiz De Porras, V.; Bystrup, S.; Martínez-Cardús, A.; Pluvinet, R.; Sumoy, L.; Howells, L.; James, M.I.; Iwuji, C.; Manzano, J.L.; Layos, L.; et al. Curcumin Mediates Oxaliplatin-Acquired Resistance Reversion in Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines through Modulation of CXC-Chemokine/NF-ΚB Signalling Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yin, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Shen, H.; Wang, X.; Wu, L. Curcumin Reverses Oxaliplatin Resistance in Human Colorectal Cancer via Regulation of TGF-β/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathway. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2019, 12, 3893–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roy, S.; Yu, Y.; Padhye, S.B.; Sarkar, F.H.; Majumdar, A.P.N. Difluorinated-Curcumin (CDF) Restores PTEN Expression in Colon Cancer Cells by Down-Regulating MiR-21. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kaminski, B.M.; Weigert, A.; Scherzberg, M.C.; Ley, S.; Gilbert, B.; Brecht, K.; Brüne, B.; Steinhilber, D.; Stein, J.; Ulrich-Rückert, S. Resveratrol-Induced Potentiation of the Antitumor Effects of Oxaliplatin Is Accompanied by an Altered Cytokine Profile of Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. Apoptosis 2014, 19, 1136–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yang, S.; Li, W.; Sun, H.; Wu, B.; Ji, F.; Sun, T.; Chang, H.; Shen, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, D. Resveratrol Elicits Anti-Colorectal Cancer Effect by Activating MiR-34c-KITLG in Vitro and in Vivo. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Park, D.G. Antichemosensitizing Effect of Resveratrol in Cotreatment with Oxaliplatin in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cell. Ann. Surg. Treat. Res. 2014, 86, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jung, G.R.; Kim, K.J.; Choi, C.H.; Lee, T.B.; Han, S.I.; Han, H.K.; Lim, S.C. Effect of Betulinic Acid on Anticancer Drug-Resistant Colon Cancer Cells. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 101, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cao, P.; Xia, Y.; He, W.; Zhang, T.; Hong, L.; Zheng, P.; Shen, X.; Liang, G.; Cui, R.; Zou, P. Enhancement of Oxaliplatin-Induced Colon Cancer Cell Apoptosis by Alantolactone, a Natural Product Inducer of ROS. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 1676–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, W.Q.; Lian, W.S.; Yuan, Y.F.; Li, M.Q. The Synergistic Effects of Oxaliplatin and Piperlongumine on Colorectal Cancer Are Mediated by Oxidative Stress. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huang, Y.F.; Zhu, D.J.; Chen, X.W.; Chen, Q.K.; Luo, Z.T.; Liu, C.C.; Wang, G.X.; Zhang, W.J.; Liao, N.Z. Curcumin Enhances the Effects of Irinotecan on Colorectal Cancer Cells through the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species and Activation of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 40264–40275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Su, P.; Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, X.; Ju, Y. Curcumin Attenuates Resistance to Irinotecan via Induction of Apoptosis of Cancer Stem Cells in Chemoresistant Colon Cancer Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 1343–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, G.; Yan, H.; Fei, Z.; Xu, Y.; Li, W. Curcumin Reverses Irinotecan Resistance in Colon Cancer Cell by Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Anticancer. Drugs 2018, 29, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ouyang, M.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, D.; Lu, Y.; Wu, J.; Yao, X. Protective Effect of Curcumin against Irinotecan-Induced Intestinal Mucosal Injury via Attenuation of NF-ΚB Activation, Oxidative Stress and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, W.; Dong, J.; Gou, H.; Geng, R.; Yang, X.; Chen, D.; Xiang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, S.; Chen, L.; et al. EGCG Synergizes the Therapeutic Effect of Irinotecan through Enhanced DNA Damage in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 7913–7921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khaleel, S.A.; Al-Abd, A.M.; Ali, A.A.; Abdel-Naim, A.B. Didox and Resveratrol Sensitize Colorectal Cancer Cells to Doxorubicin via Activating Apoptosis and Ameliorating P-Glycoprotein Activity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. El-Readi, M.Z.; Eid, S.; Abdelghany, A.A.; Al-Amoudi, H.S.; Efferth, T.; Wink, M. Resveratrol Mediated Cancer Cell Apoptosis, and Modulation of Multidrug Resistance Proteins and Metabolic Enzymes. Phytomedicine 2019, 55, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kelland, L. The Resurgence of Platinum-Based Cancer Chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Makovec, T. Cisplatin and beyond: Molecular Mechanisms of Action and Drug Resistance Development in Cancer Chemotherapy. Radiol. Oncol. 2019, 53, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Comella, P.; Casaretti, R.; Sandomenico, C.; Avallone, A.; Franco, L. Role of Oxaliplatin in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2009, 5, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zangui, M.; Atkin, S.L.; Majeed, M.; Sahebkar, A. Current Evidence and Future Perspectives for Curcumin and Its Analogues as Promising Adjuncts to Oxaliplatin: State-of-the-Art. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 141, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Patel, B.B.; Gupta, D.; Elliott, A.A.; Sengupta, V.; Yu, Y.; Majumdar, A.P. Curcumin Targets FOLFOX-Surviving Colon Cancer Cells via Inhibition of EGFRs and IGF-1R. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 319–325. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yu, Y.; Kanwar, S.S.; Patel, B.B.; Nautiyal, J.; Sarkar, F.H.; Majumdar, A.P.N. Elimination of Colon Cancer Stem-Like Cells by the Combination of Curcumin and FOLFOX. Transl. Oncol. 2009, 2, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Howells, L.M.; Sale, S.; Sriramareddy, S.N.; Irving, G.R.B.; Jones, D.J.L.; Ottley, C.J.; Pearson, D.G.; Mann, C.D.; Manson, M.M.; Berry, D.P.; et al. Curcumin Ameliorates Oxaliplatin-Induced Chemoresistance in HCT116 Colorectal Cancer Cells in Vitro and in Vivo. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 129, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mita, A.C.; Mita, M.M.; Nawrocki, S.T.; Giles, F.J. Survivin: Key Regulator of Mitosis and Apoptosis and Novel Target for Cancer Therapeutics. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 5000–5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Si, J.; Zhao, X.; Gao, S.; Huang, D.; Sui, M. Advances in Delivery of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Active Metabolite 7-Ethyl-10-Hydroxycamptothecin. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 568, 118499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hammond, W.A.; Swaika, A.; Mody, K. Pharmacologic Resistance in Colorectal Cancer: A Review. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2016, 8, 57–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sievers, C.K.; Kratz, J.D.; Zurbriggen, L.D.; Loconte, N.K.; Lubner, S.J.; Uboha, N.; Mulkerin, D.; Matkowskyj, K.A.; Deming, D.A. The Multidisciplinary Management of Colorectal Cancer: Present and Future Paradigms. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 2016, 29, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Murabito, A.; Hirsch, E.; Ghigo, A. Mechanisms of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Is Mitochondrial Dysfunction the Answer? Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gera, M.; Sharma, N.; Ghosh, M.; Huynh, D.L.; Lee, S.J.; Min, T.; Kwon, T.; Jeong, D.K. Nanoformulations of Curcumin: An Emerging Paradigm for Improved Remedial Application. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 66680–66698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wong, K.E.; Ngai, S.C.; Chan, K.G.; Lee, L.H.; Goh, B.H.; Chuah, L.H. Curcumin Nanoformulations for Colorectal Cancer: A Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Quispe, C.; Mukazhanova, Z.; Knut, E.; Turgumbayeva, A.; Kipchakbayeva, A.; Seitimova, G.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Lobine, D.; Koay, A.; et al. Resveratrol-Based Nanoformulations as an Emerging Therapeutic Strategy for Cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Granja, A.; Pinheiro, M.; Reis, S. Epigallocatechin Gallate Nanodelivery Systems for Cancer Therapy. Nutrients 2016, 8, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 01948 g001 550
Figure 1. Combinatory therapeutic strategies involving a systemic chemotherapeutic drug and a plant-derived compound that proved their efficiency in reversing the acquired drug resistance in CRC. OXA—oxaliplatin; 5-FU—5-fluorouracil; IRI—irinotecan: DOXO—doxorubicin; CURC—curcumin; EGCG—epigallocatechin gallate; RES—resveratrol; ↓—increased, ↑—decreased.
Figure 1. Combinatory therapeutic strategies involving a systemic chemotherapeutic drug and a plant-derived compound that proved their efficiency in reversing the acquired drug resistance in CRC. OXA—oxaliplatin; 5-FU—5-fluorouracil; IRI—irinotecan: DOXO—doxorubicin; CURC—curcumin; EGCG—epigallocatechin gallate; RES—resveratrol; ↓—increased, ↑—decreased.
Biomedicines 10 01948 g001
Table
Table 1. Main in vitro and in vivo effects of chemotherapeutic agents in combination with plant-derived bioactive components against CRC.
Table 1. Main in vitro and in vivo effects of chemotherapeutic agents in combination with plant-derived bioactive components against CRC.
DrugPlant-Derived Bioactive ComponentExperimental ModelMain EffectMolecular TargetRef.
5-FUCurcuminHCT-8
HCT-8/5-FU (5-FU-resistant)		Reversal effects on the multidrug resistance↓ P-gp HSP-27[52]
SW-480Enhance the therapeutic effects of 5-FU
Induction of ROS		↓ Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, miR-27a[53]
HCT116/
HCT116-5FUR SW480/SW480-5FUR		Suppressed EMT↑ miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-141, miR-429, miR-101
↓ BMI1, SUZ12, EZH2 mRNA		[54]
EGCGDLD-1Synergistic growth suppression, apoptosis-[24]
HCT-116Promotes cancer cell apoptosis and suppressed EMT↓ GRP78, MDR1, Bcl-2
↑ miR-155-5p, caspase-3 PARP, Bad		[23]
ResveratrolDLD-1Synergistic growth suppression,
apoptosis		miR-34a/E2F3/Sirt1 cascade[24]
DLD1 HCT116Enhanced the antiproliferative potential of 5-FU
Augmented 5-FU pro-apoptotic effect
Repressed EMT transition		↓ Akt and STAT3 pathways
↓ slug and vimentin		[57]
HT-29
SW-620 CRC		Enhanced ROS and lipid peroxides↓ AKT, STAT3[58]
HCT116/HCT116R in 3D-alginate tumor microenvironmentSuppressed EMT↓ TNF- β, vimentin, slug
↑ E-cadherin		[59]
CisplatinEGCGDLD-1
HT-29		Synergistic effect on inhibition of cell proliferation and induction
of cell death		↑ LC3-II[60]
OxaliplatinCurcuminHT29/HTOXAR3
DLD1/DLDOXAR3
LoVo/LoVOXAR3		Re-sensitized oxaliplatin-resistant cells↓ NF-κB, CXCL8, CXCL1, CXCL2
↓ Akt pathway		[61]
HCT116/OXA xenograft miceReverse oxaliplatin resistance-reduced tumor weight and volume↓ Smad2/3[62]
Difluorinated-CurcuminHCT116 xenograft miceRe-sensitize drug-resistant micemiR-21-PTEN-Akt axis[63]
ResveratrolCaco-2Reduce cell growth
immunomodulator		↑ caspase-3, PARP[64]
HT-29
HCT-116		Sensitized cells to oxaliplatin↑ miR-34c
↓ KITLG		[65]
HCT116 xenograft miceAugmented efficacy on suppressing tumor growth-[65]
HCT116Antichemosensitizing effect↑ survivin[66]
Betulinic acidSNU-C5/OXT-RSensitized cells to oxaliplatin↓ Bcl-2
↑ Bad		[67]
AlanolactoneHCT-116Induction of ROS
Enhanced the effect of oxaliplatin		JNK, p38 MAPK apoptotic pathways[68]
PiperlongumineHCT-116
LoVo		Sensitizes cells to oxaliplatin
Enhances oxaliplatin-associated ROS production		↓ Bcl-2
↑ Bax, ER-stress- associated proteins (eIF2α, ATF4, CHOP)		[69]
IrinotecanCurcuminLoVo
HT-29		Enhanced the effects of irinotecan in inhibiting colorectal cancer cell viability
Enhanced the anti-tumor activity of irinotecan through reactive oxygen species generation		-[70]
LoVo/CPT-11 (irinotecan-resistant cells)Significantly attenuated chemoresistance to irinotecan through induction of apoptosis of CSCs↓ CD44, EpCAM, CD24, Bcl-2
↑ Bax		[71]
LoVo/CPT-11RSuppressed EMT↑ E-cadherin
↓ vimentin, N-cadherin		[72]
Irinotecan-treated BALB/c nude miceProtective effect against irinotecan-induced intestinal mucosal injury↓ NF-κB[73]
EGCGRKO
HCT116		Stronger inhibitory effect on tumor cells
Prevention of migration and invasion
S or G2 phase arrest
induction of apoptosis		↓ topoisomerase I[74]
DoxorubicinResveratrolHCT116Sensitize colorectal cancer cells to doxorubicin via facilitating apoptosis and enhancing intracellular entrapment↑ Bax
↓ P-gp		[75]
Multidrug-resistant Caco-2Inhibition of ABC-transporters’ efflux functions↓ P-gp, MRP1, BCRP, CYP3A4, GST, hPXR mRNA[76]
↓—increased, ↑—decreased.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gavrilas, L.I.; Cruceriu, D.; Mocan, A.; Loghin, F.; Miere, D.; Balacescu, O. Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Colorectal Cancer: Insights from Combined Regimens with Conventional Chemotherapy to Overcome Drug-Resistance. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081948

AMA Style

Gavrilas LI, Cruceriu D, Mocan A, Loghin F, Miere D, Balacescu O. Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Colorectal Cancer: Insights from Combined Regimens with Conventional Chemotherapy to Overcome Drug-Resistance. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(8):1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081948

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gavrilas, Laura Ioana, Daniel Cruceriu, Andrei Mocan, Felicia Loghin, Doina Miere, and Ovidiu Balacescu. 2022. "Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Colorectal Cancer: Insights from Combined Regimens with Conventional Chemotherapy to Overcome Drug-Resistance" Biomedicines 10, no. 8: 1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081948

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop