Next Article in Journal
A Factor XIa Inhibitor Engineered from Banded Krait Venom Toxin: Efficacy and Safety in Rodent Models of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Cell Reprogramming for Regeneration and Repair of the Nervous System
Previous Article in Journal
Patient-Derived Lung Tumoroids—An Emerging Technology in Drug Development and Precision Medicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gut Microbiota–Brain Axis as a Potential Modulator of Psychological Stress after Spinal Cord Injury
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Review of Drug Therapy for Peripheral Facial Nerve Regeneration That Can Be Used in Actual Clinical Practice

Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1678; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071678
by Soo Young Choi 1, Jung Min Kim 1, Junyang Jung 2, Dong Choon Park 3, Myung Chul Yoo 4, Sung Soo Kim 5, Sang Hoon Kim 1 and Seung Geun Yeo 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1678; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071678
Submission received: 14 June 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 12 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nervous System Injury, Regeneration, and Neuromodulation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very well written comprehensive review of drugs that have shown efficacy for nerve regeneration and could be used off-label for facial nerve regeneration. 

 

Intro:

"The next most important factor is the drug used." This seems presumptuous. Do you have a citation? Please remove or moderate this statement. The rest of the paragraph lays out the uncertainty of efficacy and limitations of use for the the various drugs that can be considered... other than steroids, none of these drugs have been clinically tested and therefore are not clinically indicated for facial nerve regeneration

 

2.3.2 Growth Hormones

-There are many more studies showing the efficacy of IGF-1 for nerve injuries in translational models. Consider including some of these. 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This subject is of great importance given the significant morbidity facial paralysis can cause and the little known regarding medical therapy in patients with facial paralysis. The authors do a good job presenting the broad and varied evidence existing for medical therapies in facial paralysis. I would recommend adding 1-2 more paragraphs to the conclusion to summarize the research presented and offer suggestions for future research. Specifically, the below topics should be presented in the conclusion:

1) Majority of facial nerve medical therapy research has been performed in rodents. Rodents have robust peripheral nerve regeneration, likely at least in part due to the short distances axons have to regenerate across compared to humans. More studies are required in NHP models, as well as more clinical trials. 

2) Much of this research does not assess functional outcomes but presents morphologic and histologic findings that may or may not correlate with improved function. 

3) Clinically, facial paralysis is a manifestation of many different disease processes. Medications may have differing impacts on facial nerve recovery depending on the underlying etiology. 

Another moderate revision required is a section on Antiviral therapy as Valacyclovir and Acyclovir are relatively well-studied medications in Ramsay Hunt syndrome as well as Bell's palsy. This is the second most commonly used medication clinically in facial paralysis patients and so should be discussed. 

Minor revisions suggested:

1) The abstract mentions complete recovery after facial paralysis is "impossible." This statement is not correct as many patients after Bell's palsy, Ramsay Hunt syndrome, and other causes of facial paralysis make a complete recovery. 

2) Page two notes the second most important factor regarding how well a patient will recover from facial paralysis is the "drug used." This statement is not correct (depends on the etiology of facial paralysis, duration of facial paralysis, etc.) and so I would recommend removing it or adjusting to say an important factor regarding outcome of paralysis is drug used. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop