Next Article in Journal
The Biosynthesis and Medicinal Properties of Taraxerol
Next Article in Special Issue
Ferroptosis Inducer Improves the Efficacy of Oncolytic Virus-Mediated Cancer Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
CAR-T Cells/-NK Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy and the Potential of MSC to Enhance Its Efficacy: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systemic Injection of Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Suppresses Primary Tumor Growth and Lung Metastasis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma by Remodeling Tumor Microenvironment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/biomedicines10040805
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Augments T Cell Factor 1-Positive Stem-like CD8+ T Cells, Which Underlies the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Combination Immunotherapy

by
Yun-Hui Jeon
1,2,
Namhee Lee
3,
Jiyoon Yoo
1,2,
Solchan Won
1,2,
Suk-kyung Shin
1,2,
Kyu-Hwan Kim
1,
Jun-Gyu Park
1,
Min-Gang Kim
1,2,
Hang-Rae Kim
1,2,
Keunhee Oh
3,* and
Dong-Sup Lee
1,2,*
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
2
Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Hongcheon-gun 25159, Korea
3
SillaJen, Inc. Research Center, Seongnam-si 13493, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(4), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040805
Submission received: 27 February 2022 / Revised: 16 March 2022 / Accepted: 28 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oncolytic Viruses as a Novel Form of Immunotherapy for Cancer III)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oncolytic virotherapy has garnered attention as an antigen-agnostic therapeutic cancer vaccine that induces cancer-specific T cell responses without additional antigen loading. As anticancer immune responses are compromised by a lack of antigenicity and chronic immunosuppressive microenvironments, an effective immuno-oncology modality that converts cold tumors into hot tumors is crucial. To evaluate the immune-activating characteristics of oncolytic vaccinia virus (VACV; JX-594, pexastimogene devacirepvec), diverse murine syngeneic cancer models with different tissue types and immune microenvironments were used. Intratumorally administered mJX-594, a murine variant of JX-594, potently increased CD8+ T cells, including antigen-specific cancer CD8+ T cells, and decreased immunosuppressive cells irrespective of tissue type or therapeutic efficacy. Remodeling of tumors into inflamed ones by mJX-594 led to a response to combined anti-PD-1 treatment, but not to mJX-594 or anti-PD-1 monotherapy. mJX-594 treatment increased T cell factor 1-positive stem-like T cells among cancer-specific CD8+ T cells, and anti-PD-1 combination treatment further increased proliferation of these cells, which was important for therapeutic efficacy. The presence of functional cancer-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen and bone marrow for an extended period, which proliferated upon encountering cancer antigen-loaded splenic dendritic cells, further indicated that long-term durable anticancer immunity was elicited by oncolytic VACV.

1. Introduction

The efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy for cancer was originally thought to be dependent on selective lysis of infected cancer cells; therefore, efficient cancer targeting and extensive intratumoral virus replication and propagation were considered limiting factors for cancer treatment [1]. However, subsequent studies have shown that oncolytic viruses (OVs) effectively induce immunogenic cancer cell death and release tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), suggesting that OVs evoke systemic immune responses against cancer antigens [2,3]. Therefore, OVs have been proposed as ideal agents for activating cancer-specific T cell responses, converting them into immunologically hot tumors, which is a prerequisite for the currently prevailing immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies, such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibodies, and eventually synergizing them with these antibodies [4,5]. Indeed, oncolytic herpes simplex virus, which was the first United States Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for advanced melanoma, showed synergistic anti-cancer activity with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy by promoting intratumoral T cell infiltration [6].
Immune responses against cancer are hampered by the poor activation of cancer-specific T cells and the suppressive nature of the tumor immune microenvironment [7,8]. Immune evasion by cancer results in a persistent antigen presence leads to exhausted T cell phenotypes in cancer [9]. These cells are divided into weakly and terminally exhausted T cells, where the former can be reinvigorated by ICB treatment [10]. Stem-like T cells show proliferative capacity following ICB treatment, and T cell factor 1 (TCF1) is an important marker for these cells [11]. A high percentage of stem-like T cells in the tumor is correlated with a good cancer prognosis [12] and a robust response to ICB [13]. The intratumoral niche has been proposed to be involved in the maintenance and differentiation of stem-like CD8+ T cells [14], and tumor-draining lymph nodes act as the reservoir for ongoing antitumor immune responses [15]. In addition, activation of stem-like CD8+ T cells is important for the therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticle vaccinations [16] and adoptive cell immunotherapy [17]. OVs have been considered antigen-agnostic cancer vaccines, as they kill cancer cells, release TAA, and induce TAA-specific T cell responses even without additional neo-antigens [18]. Thus, we consider stem-like cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cells to be key components of the OV-mediated immune response and synergistic action of combination therapies involving ICB.
Vaccinia virus (VACV) is highly immunogenic and has a broad range of host cells; therefore, it is an ideal candidate for oncolytic virotherapy [19]. Pexa-vec (pexastimogene devacirepvec, JX-594) is an oncolytic VACV with a defective viral thymidine kinase (TK) gene. It can activate dendritic cells (DCs) via granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and has exerted marked antitumor effects (with low toxicity) through oncolytic, anti-angiogenic, and immune-stimulating activities in preclinical and clinical studies [20]. Recent studies have shown that a murine variant of JX-594 (mJX-594; WR.TK− murine GM-CSF) robustly modulates the tumor microenvironment (TME), thereby increasing the efficacy of ICB in kidney cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis of colon cancer [21,22,23].
Here, we comprehensively evaluated immune microenvironment changes in murine syngeneic cancer models following mJX-594 treatment and found that mJX-594 potently increased CD8+ T cells, including cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, and decreased immunosuppressive cells in the tumors irrespective of therapeutic efficacy. Remodeling of tumors into inflamed ones by JX-594 led to a response to combined anti-PD-1 treatment in tumors, where single therapy, of either high-dose JX-594 or anti-PD-1 antibody, did not have significant tumor-reducing effects. mJX-594 treatment increased effector T cell and TCF1+ stem-like T cell expression among cancer-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue and spleen; anti-PD-1 antibody further increased these cells, which was important for therapeutic efficacy. These stem-like CD8+ T cells survived for an extended period in the secondary lymphoid organs and bone marrow and were functional in terms of in situ proliferation by antigen-loaded DCs, further demonstrating the long-term anticancer immunity induced by immunotherapy with oncolytic VACV and ICB.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice aged 7–8 weeks were purchased from Koatech (Pyeongtaek, Korea) and housed under standard specific pathogen-free conditions at Seoul National University Animal Facility (Seoul, Korea). All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University Hospital (no.19-0107-S1A1, 25 November 2019).

2.2. Cell Lines

EMT6 (experimental mammary tumour-6, murine triple-negative breast cancer cells of BALB/c origin), B16-F10 (B16 melanoma F10, murine melanoma cancer cells of C57BL/6 origin), RENCA (renal carcinoma, murine renal cell carcinoma cells of BALB/c origin), LLC (Lewis lung carcinoma, murine lung cancer cells of C57BL/6 origin), MB49 (mouse bladder-49, murine bladder cancer cells of BALB/c origin), MC38 (murine carcinoma-38, murine colon cancer cells of C57BL/6 origin), CT26 (colon tumor-26, murine colon cancer cells of BALB/c origin), and 4T1 (murine metastatic triple-negative breast cancer cells of BALB/c origin) cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA). As a cancer-specific immune response model, we established an LLC cell line expressing ovalbumin (OVA) (LLC-OVA) by transfecting the gene encoding cytosolic whole OVA protein into the LLC cell line using a lentiviral expression vector. Cancer cell lines were maintained in a complete culture medium consisting of either RPMI 1640 or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and 1% v/v antibiotic/antimycotic under sterile conditions at 37 °C in a 5% v/v CO2 atmosphere.

2.3. Oncolytic Virus

mJX-594, a mouse variant of JX-594, was propagated and provided by SillaJen, Inc. (Seoul, Korea). mJX-594 is a Western Reserve strain of VACV encoding murine GM-CSF in the vaccinia TK gene locus under the control of the p7.5 promoter. To amplify the virus, the host cell HeLa was infected with the virus at 0.02 MOI (multiplicity of infection) for 48 h and the infected cells were lysed in hypotonic lysis buffer. The infected cell lysate was filtered to eliminate host cell debris and concentrated by 36% sucrose cushion centrifugation. The virus was stored at −80 °C.

2.4. Tumor Models and Treatment Regimens

To generate tumor models, 2 × 105 cancer cells were implanted by subcutaneous injection into the right flank fat pads of wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. When the tumor volumes reached 50–60 mm3, mice with size-matched tumors were randomly assigned to the experimental groups, followed by intratumoral injection of either vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS), 1 × 107, or 5 × 107 plaque-forming units (pfu) of mJX-594, three or four times at 3-day intervals. Vehicle and virus were prepared in a volume of 40 μL per tumor burden for one mouse. Tumor growth was monitored every 2–3 days until the end of the experiment (tumor volume ≤ 1500 mm3). Tumor volumes were calculated as (width × width × length)/2.
To assess the proliferative activity of cancer antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells, LLC-OVA cancer-bearing mice were intratumorally treated with either vehicle or 5 × 107 pfu mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6, and primary tumors were resected 25 days after the first mJX-594 treatment to improve survival. Three days before analysis, 3 × 106 splenic DCs loaded with either vehicle or OVA 357–364 peptide (SIINFEKL) were injected intravenously into the mice. Thereafter, the mice were twice administered 10 mg/kg of EdU (5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on 2 consecutive days. DCs were prepared by incubation with 100 nM peptide for 2 h at 37 °C just prior to injection. Twenty-four hours after the second EdU labeling, EdU incorporation was measured by staining the cells isolated from the mice using a Click-iT™ EdU Flow Cytometry Assay Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis of Tumor-Associated Immune Cells

For flow cytometric analysis, the tumors were dissected into small pieces and subjected to digestion with 40 μg/mL DNase I (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and 1 mg/mL collagenase D (Roche) for 60 min at 37 °C. Leukocytes were isolated with a 30–70% Percoll gradient (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Wauwatosa, WI, USA). The spleens of all of the mice were harvested and minced. Bone marrow cells from the femora and tibiae of all mice were flushed with DMEM containing 2% horse serum (Gibco-BRL) and 10 mM HEPES. Single-cell suspensions were washed, and red blood cells (RBCs) were lysed with RBC lysis buffer (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The cells were resuspended in staining buffer containing 2% horse serum and 0.05% sodium azide, followed by application of an Fc receptor-blocking procedure using anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (clone 2.4G2; BioLegend) for 10 min; they were then immunostained with the following fluorochrome-conjugated primary antibodies: anti-CD45.2 (104), anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD4 (RM4-5), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-PD-1 (29F.1A12), anti-TIM3 (RMT3-23), anti-Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), anti-F4/80 (T45-2342), anti-KLRG1 (2F1), anti-IL-7Rα (A7R34), anti-TCF-1/TCF-7 (C63D9), Fixable Viability Stain 780 (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA), H-2Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer (Immudex, Copenhagen, Denmark) for the detection of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells, and VACV B8R tetramer (H-2Kb-TSYKFESV tetramer; Immudex) for the detection of VACV-specific CD8+ T cells. Following surface staining, the cells were incubated with fixation-permeabilization buffer, washed with permeabilization buffer (Fixation/Permeabilization Solution Kit; BD Biosciences), and incubated with antibodies against intracellular antigens. Samples were processed with a BD Fortessa X-20™ Cell Analyzer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (version 10.8.1 FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.6. Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed on the frozen tissue sections. The tumors were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C and infiltrated with graded sucrose solution (from 15% to 30%). Tissues incubated in 30% sucrose solution were frozen in an optimal cutting temperature compound, and the cut tissues (50-μm-thick) were transferred to a 12-well plate filled with storing solution. Tissue sections were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocked in 10% normal goat serum in PBS-T (0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS), and then incubated overnight with the following primary antibodies: anti-cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31)/platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (rabbit; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA), anti-CD8 (rat, 53-6.7; Novus Biologicals), and anti-CD11b (rabbit; Novus Biologicals). After several washes with PBS, the samples were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with Alexa fluor 594 dye-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa-fluor 488 dye-conjugated anti-rat IgG (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Finally, the samples were mounted with fluorescent mounting medium (DakoCytomation Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA) and images were acquired with an inverted microscope (DMi8; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction. For analyzing flow cytometry data, FlowJo software (version 10.8.1; FlowJo) was used. The two-tailed unpaired t-test was used to evaluate differences in immunogenicity between groups. Data are expressed as means with standard error of the mean (SEM), and p < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Differential Treatment Efficacy of mJX-594 in Syngeneic Murine Cancer Models

For better evaluation of the immunological characteristics of oncolytic VACV, we analyzed the treatment efficacy of intratumoral administration of mJX-594 using several well-characterized murine cancer cells, including orthotopically transplanted cancers (4T1, EMT6 and B16-F10) and subcutaneously transplanted cancers (LLC, LLC-OVA, MC38, CT26, MB49 and RENCA). Two different doses of mJX-594 (high dose: 5 × 107 pfu, low dose: 2 × 107 pfu) were administered intratumorally, three times at 3-day intervals, starting when the primary tumor mass reached 50–60 mm3 (Figure 1A). According to the therapeutic efficacy of mJX-594, murine cancer cells were classified into the following subgroups: more than half of the tumors were in complete remission (CR) after high-dose treatment (EMT6 breast cancer); tumor regression was evident after low-dose treatment and some tumors achieved CR through high-dose treatment (B16-F10 melanoma, RENCA renal cell carcinoma, and MB49 bladder cancer); dose-dependent tumor regression but CR was not achieved through high-dose treatment (LLC non-small-cell lung cancer and MC38 colon cancer); and there was no efficacy of low- or high-dose treatment (CT26 colon cancer and 4T1 breast cancer) (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S1).

3.2. Marked CD8+ T Cell Recruitment in the Tumor following mJX-594 Treatment

To elucidate the differential efficacy and characteristic mechanisms of action of mJX-594 in murine cancer models, we performed multi-color flow cytometry analysis of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes. Both the innate and adaptive arms of immune cells were analyzed 3 days after the last injection of mJX-594 (Figure 2A). The relative percentages of each subset of immune cells among tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (CD45+), and the absolute numbers of each subset per milligram of tumor tissue, were determined. All of the murine cancers used in this study contained high proportions (>50%) of immunosuppressive myeloid cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tumor-associated macrophages, and the relative percentages of MDSCs and macrophages differed among cancer cells (Figure 2D,E). T cells were the minority population among tumor-infiltrating leukocytes. Moreover, compared to human cancers, all of the murine cancers in this study were immune desert or immune-excluded phenotypes, with few cells in or around the tumor tissue (Figure 2C,E). At 3 days following the third inoculation of mJX-594, the total CD3+ T cell numbers in the tumor tissue increased by at least fourfold, irrespective of therapeutic efficacy in vivo, even with low-dose treatment (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S2). After high-dose treatment, the relative percentage of CD3+ T cells among CD45+ leukocytes increased by 2.1–7.8 fold, and the cell numbers per milligram of tumor tissue increased by 2.6–26.0 fold (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S2). The increase in intratumoral CD8+ T cells was more dramatic. The relative percentage of CD8+ T cells among CD45+ leukocytes increased by 3.1–19.6 fold, and the cell numbers per milligram of tumor tissue increased by 2.5–72.0 fold (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S2). A marked increase in the CD8+ T cell population in the tumor was a key advantage of oncolytic VACV treatment. There was an increase in CD8+ T cells in all of the cancers tested, irrespective of clinical efficacy, tissue type, or sensitivity to ICB.
Regarding the immunosuppressive cells recruited by the tumor, each cancer cell had a different immunosuppressive population (typically myeloid cells, such as MDSCs and tumor-associated macrophages, and regulatory T cells) [24]. All of the cancers tested exhibited decreases in the absolute numbers and relative percentages of immunosuppressive myeloid cells after mJX-594 treatment, irrespective of therapeutic efficacy (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S2). A dramatic increase in intratumoral CD8+ T cells and a decrease in myeloid cells were confirmed by immunofluorescence microscopy.
Although we cannot accurately predict whether a cancer will respond to mJX-594 therapeutically based on their tumor immune profiles before treatment, we know that mJX-594 treatment markedly increases intratumoral CD3+ T cells and (more profoundly) CD8+ T cells, and simultaneously decreases immunosuppressive cells such as MDSCs and macrophages in the TME. In summary, oncolytic VACV potently activates and recruits T cells, especially CD8+ T cells, in the tumor and renders tumor immune microenvironments more favorable for T cell responses when combined with ICB.

3.3. Cancer-Specific CD8+ T Cells as Well as Vaccinia Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Are Efficiently Activated and Recruited to Tumor Tissue

As the administration of VACV equates to an induced viral infection, which triggers effective antiviral cytotoxic T cell responses, we postulated that the increased T cell responses, especially CD8+ T cell responses, seen following intratumoral mJX-594 treatment may have included anticancer-specific CD8+ T cell responses. To pinpoint the cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cell response, we used the LLC-OVA cancer model, which expresses cytosolic a “whole sequence” OVA protein that serves as a cancer neo-antigen. We evaluated neoantigen (OVA)-specific CD8+ T cell responses using the Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer. The VACV-specific CD8+ T cell response was evaluated using the Kb-TSYKFESV tetramer, which detected an epitope from B8R encoding a secreted protein with homology to the interferon gamma receptor [25]. mJX-594 (5 × 107 pfu) was administered intratumorally, three times at 3-day intervals, starting when the primary LLC-OVA tumor reached 50–60 mm3 (Figure 1A). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed on day 3 after the last virus administration (i.e., 9 days after the first virus treatment), during which the CD8+ T cell response was maximal. mJX-594 treatment increased OVA-specific CD8+ T cell expression, as well as VACV-specific CD8+ T cell expression, more than 10-fold in terms of the percentage and 30–50-fold in terms of the number of cells per milligram of tumor tissue, compared to vehicle treatment (Figure 3A–C). These results show that mJX-594 effectively infected and destroyed cancer cells, and released cancer antigens in an immunogenic manner, thus efficiently activating and recruiting cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cells into the tumor tissue.

3.4. Anti-PD-1 Combination Therapy Increases Treatment Efficacy and Intratumoral Infiltration of T Cells in Two Murine Cancer Models

As mJX-594 markedly increased intratumoral CD8+ T cells in all syngeneic murine cancer cells tested irrespective of their therapeutic efficacy, mouse strain, or tumor immune microenvironment before inoculation, and also increased cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor, we considered mJX-594 to be among the most powerful reagents for converting immune desert or immune-excluded cancers into inflamed ones, thus making them susceptible to ICB therapies, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies. We tested 4T1 cancer cells, which are resistant to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy [24], and found that they did not respond to mJX-594 monotherapy at a high dose, but nevertheless exhibited an increase of intratumoral CD8+ T cells (by 6.7-fold) following mJX-594 treatment (Figure 2E and Supplementary Figure S2). Single therapy, of either high-dose mJX-594 or anti-PD-1 antibody, did not have significant tumor-reducing effects in 4T1-bearing mice. Combined treatment with mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 had anti-cancer effects on the murine triple-negative breast cancer 4T1 (Supplementary Figure S3A–C). These results showed that mJX-594 treatment sensitizes one of the most resistant murine cancer cells to anti-PD-1 antibody therapy.
To confirm the synergistic effect of mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 antibody, we used the MC38 murine colon cancer model, and combined low-dose mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Low-dose mJX-594 single therapy achieved 37% inhibition, while anti-PD-1 single therapy did not achieve a significant reduction. Combination therapy achieved tumor growth inhibition of 69% (Figure 4A–C). Increased numbers of CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue, as induced by mJX-594 treatment, were confirmed by immunofluorescence microscopy on days 9 and 15 of the first mJX-594 injection (Figure 4A). Vehicle treatment was associated with few CD8+ T cells in tumor tissue, and anti-PD-1 antibody single therapy slightly increased CD8+ T cell expression. However, single therapy of mJX-594 dramatically increased CD8+ T cell infiltration into the tumor tissue, and combined anti-PD-1 antibody further increased these cell populations (Figure 4D,E). A dramatic reduction of the CD11b+ myeloid population, the majority of which comprised MDSCs (Figure 2E), by mJX-594 single therapy and combination therapy with anti-PD-1 antibody was observed and anti-PD-1 single therapy did not significantly decrease these cell populations (Figure 4D,E). Reduction of the CD31 area (Figure 4D,E) reflected the well-known tumor-associated endothelial cell damage induced by VACV [26].

3.5. Among Cancer Antigen-Specific T Cells, TCF1+ Stem-like CD8+ T Cells Are Increased by mJX-594 and Further Increased by Anti-PD-1 Antibody Combination Treatment

As the production of TCF1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells is related to protective immunity following cancer vaccination [16], the prognosis of the patient [12], and putative future memory T cells [27], we evaluated whether stem-like CD8+ T cells were increased by mJX-594 treatment. We inoculated LLC-OVA cancer cells into the subcutaneous region and applied 5 × 107 Pfu mJX-594 intratumorally three times at 3-day intervals, starting when the primary tumor mass reached 50–60 mm3. Anti-PD-1 antibody was intravenously injected, starting on day 3 of mJX-594 inoculation, at 3-day intervals a total of three times. Tumor growth was inhibited by 55% by high-dose treatment of mJX-594 but was not inhibited by anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy. A synergistic tumor-inhibiting effect of the combined treatment was also seen (Figure 5A).
Tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and splenocytes were analyzed 3 days after the last injection of mJX-594 (day 9 after the first injection). The mJX-594 treatment was highly effective for CD8+ T cell differentiation. KLRG1+ CD8+ T cells were markedly increased by mJX-594 treatment and further increased by anti-PD-1 combination treatment in both the tumor and spleen (Figure 5B–D). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy did not appreciably increase effector cell expression. Both KLRG1+IL-7Rα− short-lived effector cells and KLRG1+IL-7Rα+ memory precursor effector cells were increased (Figure 5B,C). GZMB+ CD8+ T cells were also prominently increased by mJX-594 treatment and further increased by anti-PD-1 combination treatment in the spleen (Figure 5E,F).
TCF-1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells were also increased by mJX-594 treatment in the tumor and the spleen 9 days after the injection and further increased by anti-PD-1 combination treatment in the spleen (Figure 5H–J). On day 30 following the last injection (36 days after the first injection), increased percentages of TCF-1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells were noted in both the spleen and bone marrow (Figure 5K–N).
Kb-SIINFEKL+ OVA-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor were increased by mJX-594 and further increased by combined treatment involving anti-PD-1 (Supplementary Figure S4B). Among Kb-SIINFEKL+ CD8+ T cells, KLRG1+ effector T cells were also increased in both the tumor and spleen by mJX-594 treatment (Supplementary Figure S4C,D). TCF-1+PD-1+ stem-like Kb-SIINFEKL+ CD8+ T cells were also increased by mJX-594 treatment in the tumor and spleen on day 9 (Supplementary Figure S4E,F). On day 36 after the first injection, increased percentages of TCF-1+PD-1+ stem-like Kb-SIINFEKL+ CD8+ T cells were noted in both the spleen and bone marrow (Supplementary Figure S4G,H).

3.6. Cancer Neoantigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells That Survive for Extended Periods in the Spleen and Bone Marrow Proliferate in Response to Antigen-Loaded DCs In Situ

We showed that TCF-1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cell expression was increased in terms of both total and cancer neoantigen-specific CD8+ cells on day 9 after the first viral infection, and it remained elevated on day 36. To confirm the functional capacity of the cancer-specific stem-like/memory-like T cells in the lymphoid organs in situ following mJX-594-mediated cancer treatment, we utilized the LLC-OVA cancer model. We subcutaneously inoculated LLC-OVA cancer cells into mice, followed by intratumoral treatment with 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (five times at 3-day intervals starting when the primary tumor mass reached 50–60 mm3). To detect functional stem-like/memory-like T cells in specific organs, we used antigen-loaded splenic DCs for in situ activation of local antigen-specific T cells. As systematically injected DCs localize in the bone marrow and secondary lymphoid organs [28], we loaded SIINFEKL peptide (OVA peptides 357–364) onto splenic DCs, which were then injected intravenously. Proliferating Kb-SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells were evaluated using a CD45 congenic marker, Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer, and the EdU click chemistry method [29] on days 39 and 60 (Figure 6) after the first mJX-594 injection. We found that cancer neoantigen-specific T cells in the spleen and bone marrow proliferated in response to SIINFEKL-loaded splenic DCs (Figure 6). These results indicated that cancer neoantigen-specific T cells were present in the secondary lymphoid organs and bone marrow for a protracted period and were also functional (as they responded to antigen-loaded splenic DCs).

4. Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the immune-modulating characteristics of oncolytic VACV using murine syngeneic cancer models. We found that oncolytic VACV Pexa-vec (mJX-594) potently increased CD8+ T cells, including cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, and decreased immunosuppressive cells in tumors irrespective of therapeutic efficacy (Figure 2). These findings indicate that mJX-594 was highly effective at transforming immune desert and immune-excluded tumors into inflamed ones and modulating the immunosuppressive TME. These typical assets of mJX-594 were ideal for combination therapy involving anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1, which only targets inflamed tumors in which treatment reinvigorated immune exhausted T cells in the TME [30]. Indeed, mJX-594 led to a response to combination anti-PD-1 blocking antibody treatment in one of the most resistant murine cancer cell lines, which did not respond to mJX-594 single therapy or anti-PD-1 single therapy (Supplementary Figure S3) [24].
In the TME and cancer-bearing hosts, the functional capacity of cancer-specific effector CD8+ T cells was compromised by the expression of several negative immune checkpoint molecules on their surfaces, which led to their exhaustion [8,9]. Among these dysfunctional cancer-infiltrating T cells, which are quite similar to the exhausted cells seen in chronic viral infection, some subpopulations were still functional, where the number of these subpopulations correlated with the overall survival of several cancer types of human cancers [12,14]. The cells in these subpopulations proliferated following anti-PD-1 therapy and differentiated into effector T cells that controlled the tumor and maintained homeostasis, thus preventing further tumor progression [12,31]. The phenotype of these cells was TCF1+ PD-1+, which are referred to as either stem-like or progenitor-exhausted T cells [32]. The proliferation of stem-like T cells is positively correlated with the clinical outcomes and overall survival of patients [12,14,33], and a recent study showed that the efficacy of neoantigen cancer vaccines was correlated with stem-like T cell generation [16]. In this study, mJX-594 treatment was quite efficient for increasing cancer antigen-specific stem-like CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue and secondary lymphoid tissue, such as the spleen and bone marrow. Moreover, the quantity of these stem-like T cells correlated with the therapeutic efficacy of mJX-594 and was further increased by (and correlated with) combination therapy involving anti-PD-1 (Figure 5 and Supplementary Figure S4). Thus, mJX-594 acted as an antigen-agnostic vaccine platform, which could activate and expand the population of cancer-specific stem-like CD8+ T cells in association with the therapeutic efficacy of this treatment modality.
In acute viral infection, TCF1+ T cells expressed following infection serve as early memory precursor cells, which eventually differentiate into permanent memory T cells [27]. Memory T cell generation is the ultimate goal of cancer immunotherapy and therapeutic cancer vaccines for the prevention of recurrence of cancer in the future [34]. However, as in chronic viral infection, this ordinary differentiation process involving the formation of permanent memory T cells following activation is compromised in cancer [34,35]. In this study, mJX-594 treatment helped normalize the TME, which allowed for differentiation of functional effector and TCF1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells. In addition, we observed an increase in the expression of cancer-specific TCF1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells following mJX-594 treatment of the spleen and bone marrow for an extended period. In murine and human tumor models, stem-like T cells were found in the TME [12,14,31], and some reports have indicated that tertiary lymphoid structures within the tumor tissue are the main sites for these T cells [36]. In chronic viral infection, stem-like CD8+ T cells are evident in the secondary lymphoid organs and respond to anti-PD-1 antibody by proliferating and differentiating into effector cells [11,37]. Regarding the location of permanent memory T cells, the bone marrow and secondary lymphoid organs are the sites of the central memory T cells, whereas the target tissues are effector memory T cells and the recently characterized resident memory T cells [38,39,40]. The existence of cancer-specific stem-like CD8+ T cells in the secondary lymphoid organs noted in this study is relevant to these previous reports, and in terms of long-term survival of functional cancer antigen-specific T cells in the spleen and bone marrow, which proliferated upon encountering cancer antigen-loaded splenic DCs 2 months after cancer treatment (Figure 6), indicating that mJX-594 treatment elicits long-term anticancer immune responses.

5. Conclusions

Intratumorally administered oncolytic VACV (mJX-594, a murine variant of JX-594, Pexa-vec) potently increased CD8+ T cell proliferation, including of cancer antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, and decreased immunosuppressive cells irrespective of tissue type or therapeutic efficacy. Remodeling of tumors into inflamed ones by mJX-594 led to a response to combined anti-PD-1 treatment but not to mJX-594 or anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Among cancer-specific CD8+ T cells, mJX-594 treatment increased the expression of TCF1+ stem-like T cells, while anti-PD-1 combination treatment further increased their expression, which was important for therapeutic efficacy. The presence of functional cancer-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen and bone marrow for an extended period, where these cells proliferated upon encountering cancer antigen-loaded splenic DCs, further indicates that long-term anti-cancer immunity is elicited by oncolytic VACV.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10040805/s1. Figure S1: Treatment efficacy of mJX-594 in syngeneic murine cancer models; Figure S2: Fold change of infiltrating leukocytes following mJX-594 treatment; Figure S3: Combinational treatment of anti-PD-1 with mJX-594 revealed anti-tumor effects in a 4T1 breast cancer model; Figure S4: Analysis of cancer neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells following mJX-594, anti-PD-1, and combination therapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.O. and D.-S.L.; methodology, Y.-H.J. and K.O.; validation, Y.-H.J., J.Y., S.W., S.-k.S., K.-H.K. and N.L.; formal analysis, Y.-H.J., J.-G.P. and M.-G.K.; investigation, Y.-H.J., K.O. and D.-S.L.; resources, Y.-H.J., J.Y. and N.L.; data curation, Y.-H.J., S.W. and S.-k.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-H.J. and K.O.; writing—review and editing, K.O., H.-R.K. and D.-S.L.; visualization, Y.-H.J. and J.-G.P.; supervision, K.O. and D.-S.L.; project administration, K.O. and D.-S.L.; funding acquisition, D.-S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from SillaJen, Inc. and by a grant from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (NRF-2021R1A2C1011920 to D.-S.L.). J.Y., S.W., S.-k.S. and M.-G.K. are supported by BK21 Four Biomedical Science Program, Seoul National University College of Medicine.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank SNUMC animal facilities for their technical support. The authors thank all the members of Kim’s group for the valuable help and support throughout the course of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

K.O. and N.L. is an employee of SillaJen, Inc. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

ANOVAanalysis of variance
ATCCAmerican Type Culture Collection
CRcomplete remission
DCdendritic cells
DMEMDulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
FBSfetal bovine serum
GM-CSFgranulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
GZMBgranzyme B
HDhigh-dose
ICBimmune checkpoint blockade
IFN-γinterferon gamma
JX-594pexastimogene devacirepvec
LDlow-dose
LLC-OVALLC cell line expressing OVA
MDSCmyeloid-derived suppressor cell
mJX-594a mouse variant of JX-594
mJXmJX-594
OVoncolytic viruses
OVAovalbumin
PBSphosphate-buffered saline
PD-1programmed cell death protein 1
PD-L1programmed death-ligand 1
Pexa-vecpexastimogene devacirepvec
pfuplaque-forming units
SEMstandard error of the mean
TAAtumor-associated antigen
TCF1T cell factor 1
TKthymidine kinase
TMEtumor microenvironment
VACVvaccinia virus
VehVehicle

References

  1. Russell, S.J.; Peng, K.H.; John, C.; Bell, J.C. Oncolytic virotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 658–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kaufman, H.L.; Kohlhapp, F.J.; Zloza, A. Oncolytic viruses: A new class of immunotherapy drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 642–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Galluzzi, L.; Buqué, A.; Kepp, O.; Zitvogel, L.; Kroemer, G. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anandappa, A.J.; Wu, C.J.; Ott, P.A. Directing Traffic: How to Effectively Drive T Cells into Tumors. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bommareddy, P.K.; Shettigar, M.; Kaufman, H.L. Integrating oncolytic viruses in combination cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 498–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ribas, A.; Dummer, R.; Puzanov, I.; VanderWalde, A.; Andtbacka, R.H.I.; Michielin, O.; Olszanski, A.J.; Malvehy, J.; Cebon, J.; Fernandez, E.; et al. Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Cell 2017, 170, 1109–1119.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dersh, D.; Hollý, J.; Yewdell, J.W. A few good peptides: MHC class I-based cancer immunosurveillance and immunoevasion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rabinovich, G.A.; Gabrilovich, D.; Sotomayor, E.M. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 25, 267–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wherry, E.J.; Ha, S.J.; Kaech, S.M.; Haining, W.N.; Sarkar, S.; Kalia, V.; Subramaniam, S.; Blattman, J.N.; Barber, D.L.; Ahmed, R. Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity 2007, 27, 670–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wherry, E.J. T cell exhaustion. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Im, S.J.; Hashimoto, M.; Gerner, M.Y.; Lee, J.; Kissick, H.T.; Burger, M.C.; Shan, Q.; Hale, J.S.; Lee, J.; Nasti, T.H.; et al. Defining CD8+ T cells that provide the proliferative burst after PD-1 therapy. Nature 2016, 537, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Miller, B.C.; Sen, D.R.; Al Abosy, R.; Bi, K.; Virkud, Y.V.; LaFleur, M.W.; Yates, K.B.; Lako, A.; Felt, K.; Naik, G.S.; et al. Subsets of exhausted CD8+ T cells differentially mediate tumor control and respond to checkpoint blockade. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fairfax, B.P.; Taylor, C.A.; Watson, R.A.; Nassiri, I.; Danielli, S.; Fang, H.; Mahé, E.A.; Cooper, R.; Woodcock, V.; Traill, Z.; et al. Peripheral CD8+ T cell characteristics associated with durable responses to immune checkpoint blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jansen, C.S.; Prokhnevska, N.; Master, V.A.; Sanda, M.G.; Carlisle, J.W.; Bilen, M.A.; Cardenas, M.; Wilkinson, S.; Lake, R.; Sowalsky, A.G.; et al. An intra-tumoral niche maintains and differentiates stem-like CD8 T cells. Nature 2019, 576, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Connolly, K.A.; Kuchroo, M.; Venkat, A.; Khatun, A.; Wang, J.; William, I.; Hornick, N.I.; Fitzgerald, B.L.; Damo, M.; Kasmani, M.Y.; et al. A reservoir of stem-like CD8+ T cells in the tumor-draining lymph node preserves the ongoing antitumor immune response. Sci. Immunol. 2021, 6, eabg7836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Baharom, F.; Ramirez-Valdez, R.A.; Tobin, K.K.S.; Yamane, H.; Dutertre, C.A.; Khalilnezhad, A.; Reynoso, G.V.; Coble, V.L.; Lynn, G.M.; Mulè, M.P.; et al. Intravenous nanoparticle vaccination generates stem-like TCF1+ neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krishna, S.; Lowery, F.J.; Copeland, A.R.; Bahadiroglu, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Jia, L.; Anibal, J.T.; Sachs, A.; Adebola, S.O.; Gurusamy, D.; et al. Stem-like CD8 T cells mediate response of adoptive cell immunotherapy against human cancer. Science 2020, 370, 1328–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Russell, S.J.; Barber, G.N. Oncolytic Viruses as Antigen-Agnostic Cancer Vaccines. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Guo, Z.S.; Lu, B.; Guo, Z.; Giehl, E.; Feist, M.; Dai, E.; Liu, W.; Storkus, W.J.; He, Y.; Liu, Z.; et al. Vaccinia virus-mediated cancer immunotherapy: Cancer vaccines and oncolytics. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, S.H.; Breitbach, C.J.; Lee, J.; Park, J.O.; Lim, H.Y.; Kang, W.K.; Moon, A.; Mun, J.H.; Sommermann, E.M.; Avidal, L.M.; et al. Phase 1b Trial of Biweekly Intravenous Pexa-Vec (JX-594), an Oncolytic and Immunotherapeutic Vaccinia Virus in Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Ther. 2015, 23, 1532–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chon, H.J.; Lee, W.S.; Yang, H.; Kong, S.J.; Lee, N.K.; Moon, E.S.; Choi, J.; Han, E.C.; Kim, J.H.; Ahn, J.B.; et al. Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling by Intratumoral Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Enhances the Efficacy of Immune-Checkpoint Blockade. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 1612–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lee, Y.S.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, C.W.; Lee, S.J.; Yang, H.; Kong, S.J.; Ning, J.; Yang, K.M.; Kang, B.; Kim, W.R.; et al. Oncolytic vaccinia virus reinvigorates peritoneal immunity and cooperates with immune checkpoint inhibitor to suppress peritoneal carcinomatosis in colon cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, J.S.; Lee, M.E.; Jang, W.S.; Kim, J.; Park, S.M.; Oh, K.; Lee, N.; Ham, W.S. Systemic Injection of Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Suppresses Primary Tumor Growth and Lung Metastasis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma by Remodeling Tumor Microenvironment. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mosely, S.I.; Prime, J.E.; Sainson, R.C.; Koopmann, J.O.; Wang, D.Y.; Greenawalt, D.M.; Ahdesmaki, M.J.; Leyland, R.; Mullins, S.; Pacelli, L.; et al. Rational Selection of Syngeneic Preclinical Tumor Models for Immunotherapeutic Drug Discovery. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Giehl, E.; Kosaka, H.; Liu, Z.; Feist, M.; Kammula, U.S.; Lotze, M.T.; Ma, C.; Guo, Z.S.; Bartlett, D.L. In Vivo Priming of Peritoneal Tumor-Reactive Lymphocytes with a Potent Oncolytic Virus for Adoptive Cell Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 610042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kim, M.; Nitschké, M.; Sennino, B.; Murer, P.; Schriver, B.J.; Bell, A.; Subramanian, A.; McDonald, C.E.; Wang, J.; Cha, H.; et al. Amplification of Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Widespread Tumor Cell Killing by Sunitinib through Multiple Mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 922–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jeannet, G.; Boudousquié, C.; Gardiol, N.; Kang, J.; Huelsken, J.; Held, W. Essential role of the Wnt pathway effector Tcf-1 for the establishment of functional CD8 T cell memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9777–9782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cavanagh, L.L.; Bonasio, R.; Mazo, I.B.; Halin, C.; Cheng, G.; van der Velden, A.W.; Cariappa, A.; Chase, C.; Russell, P.; Starnbach, M.N.; et al. Activation of bone marrow-resident memory T cells by circulating, antigen-bearing dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Oh, K.; Shon, S.Y.; Seo, M.W.; Lee, H.M.; Oh, J.E.; Choi, E.Y.; Lee, D.S.; Park, K.S. Murine Sca1+Lin− bone marrow contains an endodermal precursor population that differentiates into hepatocytes. Exp. Mol. Med. 2015, 47, e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, Z.; Ravindranathan, R.; Kalinski, P.; Guo, Z.S.; Bartlett, D.L. Rational combination of oncolytic vaccinia virus and PD-L1 blockade works synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Siddiqui, I.; Schaeuble, K.; Chennupati, V.; Marraco, S.A.F.; Calderon-Copete, S.; Ferreira, D.P.; Carmona, S.J.; Scarpellino, L.; Gfeller, D.; Pradervand, S.; et al. Intratumoral Tcf1+PD-1+CD8+ T Cells with Stem-like Properties Promote Tumor Control in Response to Vaccination and Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy. Immunity 2019, 50, 195–211.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Paley, M.A.; Kroy, D.C.; Odorizzi, P.M.; Johnnidis, J.B.; Dolfi, D.V.; Barnett, B.E.; Bikoff, E.K.; Robertson, E.J.; Lauer, G.M.; Reiner, S.L.; et al. Progenitor and terminal subsets of CD8+ T cells cooperate to contain chronic viral infection. Science 2012, 338, 1220–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, H.; van der Leun, A.M.; Yofe, I.; Lubling, Y.; Gelbard-Solodkin, D.; van Akkooi, A.C.J.; van den Braber, M.; Rozeman, E.A.; Haanen, J.B.A.G.; Blank, C.U.; et al. Dysfunctional CD8 T Cells Form a Proliferative, Dynamically Regulated Compartment within Human Melanoma. Cell 2019, 176, 775–789.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Han, J.; Khatwani, N.; Searles, T.G.; Turk, M.J.; Angeles, C.V. Memory CD8+ T cell responses to cancer. Semin. Immunol. 2020, 49, 101435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosenberg, S.A.; Sherry, R.M.; Morton, K.E.; Scharfman, W.J.; Yang, J.C.; Topalian, S.L.; Royal, R.E.; Kammula, U.; Restifo, N.P.; Hughes, M.S.; et al. Tumor progression can occur despite the induction of very high levels of self/tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with melanoma. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 6169–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kang, W.; Feng, Z.; Luo, J.; He, Z.; Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Rong, P. Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Cancer: The Double-Edged Sword Role in Antitumor Immunity and Potential Therapeutic Induction Strategies. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 689270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Im, S.J.; Konieczny, B.T.; Hudson, W.H.; Masopust, D.; Ahmed, R. PD-1+ stemlike CD8 T cells are resident in lymphoid tissues during persistent LCMV infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 4292–4299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chang, H.D.; Tokoyoda, K.; Radbruch, A. Immunological memories of the bone marrow. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 283, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masopust, D.; Soerens, A.G. Tissue-Resident T Cells and Other Resident Leukocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 37, 521–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, S.L.; Gebhardt, T.; Mackay, L.K. Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells in Cancer Immunosurveillance. Trends Immunol. 2019, 40, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 00805 g001 550
Figure 1. Differential treatment efficacy of mJX-594 in syngeneic murine cancer models. (A) mJX-594 treatment strategy. Cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously into C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 8 per group). When the tumor reached a volume of 50–60 mm3, mice were intratumorally injected, three times at 3-day intervals, with vehicle, 1 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (LD), or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (HD). (B) Tumor growth kinetics of EMT6 tumors treated with vehicle or mJX-594 (HD). (C) Tumor growth kinetics of B16-F10, RENCA, LLC-OVA, LLC, MB49, MC38, CT26, and 4T1 tumors treated with vehicle, mJX-594 (LD), or mJX-594 (HD). The inhibitory effects (%) in the LD and HD groups were compared to the vehicle control group. Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction. Data are expressed as means with standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; HD, high dose; LD, low dose; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units.
Figure 1. Differential treatment efficacy of mJX-594 in syngeneic murine cancer models. (A) mJX-594 treatment strategy. Cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously into C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 8 per group). When the tumor reached a volume of 50–60 mm3, mice were intratumorally injected, three times at 3-day intervals, with vehicle, 1 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (LD), or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (HD). (B) Tumor growth kinetics of EMT6 tumors treated with vehicle or mJX-594 (HD). (C) Tumor growth kinetics of B16-F10, RENCA, LLC-OVA, LLC, MB49, MC38, CT26, and 4T1 tumors treated with vehicle, mJX-594 (LD), or mJX-594 (HD). The inhibitory effects (%) in the LD and HD groups were compared to the vehicle control group. Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction. Data are expressed as means with standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; HD, high dose; LD, low dose; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units.
Biomedicines 10 00805 g001
Biomedicines 10 00805 g002 550
Figure 2. Profound CD8+ T cell activation and decreased expression of suppressive myeloid cells by mJX-594. (A) mJX-594 treatment strategy. Cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously into C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. When the tumor reached a volume of 50–60 mm3, mice were intratumorally injected, three times at 3-day intervals, with vehicle, 1 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (LD), or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (HD). The tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were analyzed 3 days after the last treatment with mJX-594. (B) The numbers of CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, MDSCs, and macrophages per milligram of tumor mass among infiltrated leukocytes of B16-F10 melanoma. (C) Flowcytometric analysis and gating strategies for CD3+ T cells and CD11b+ myeloid cells among infiltrated leukocytes (upper) and CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells among infiltrated CD3+ cells (lower) of B16-F10 melanoma. (D) Flowcytometric analysis and gating strategies for MDSCs (CD11b+ Gr-1+) (upper) and macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+) (lower) among infiltrated leukocytes of B16-F10 melanoma. (E) Summarized relative proportions of CD8+ lymphocyte, CD4+ lymphocyte, MDSC, macrophage, and other immune cells among infiltrated leukocytes of B16-F10, RENCA, MB49, MC38, CT26, and 4T1 tumors. Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 6 per group). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; mJX, mJX-594; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units; Veh, vehicle.
Figure 2. Profound CD8+ T cell activation and decreased expression of suppressive myeloid cells by mJX-594. (A) mJX-594 treatment strategy. Cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously into C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. When the tumor reached a volume of 50–60 mm3, mice were intratumorally injected, three times at 3-day intervals, with vehicle, 1 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (LD), or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 (HD). The tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were analyzed 3 days after the last treatment with mJX-594. (B) The numbers of CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, MDSCs, and macrophages per milligram of tumor mass among infiltrated leukocytes of B16-F10 melanoma. (C) Flowcytometric analysis and gating strategies for CD3+ T cells and CD11b+ myeloid cells among infiltrated leukocytes (upper) and CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells among infiltrated CD3+ cells (lower) of B16-F10 melanoma. (D) Flowcytometric analysis and gating strategies for MDSCs (CD11b+ Gr-1+) (upper) and macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+) (lower) among infiltrated leukocytes of B16-F10 melanoma. (E) Summarized relative proportions of CD8+ lymphocyte, CD4+ lymphocyte, MDSC, macrophage, and other immune cells among infiltrated leukocytes of B16-F10, RENCA, MB49, MC38, CT26, and 4T1 tumors. Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 6 per group). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; mJX, mJX-594; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units; Veh, vehicle.
Biomedicines 10 00805 g002
Biomedicines 10 00805 g003 550
Figure 3. Cancer-specific CD8+ T cells and vaccinia virus-specific CD8+ T cells were efficiently activated and recruited to the tumor tissue. LLC-OVA cancer cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When tumors reached 50–60 mm3 in volume, the mice were intratumorally injected with vehicle or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6. The tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry on day 3 after the last treatment with mJX-594. (A) The proportion of vaccinia virus B8R-specific CD8+ T cells (Kb-TSYKFESV tetramer-positive) among CD3+ T cells. (B) The proportion of neoantigen (OVA)-specific T cells (Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer-positive) among CD3+ T cells. (C) Cell number per milligram of tumor mass of intratumoral CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B8R vaccinia-specific CD8+ T cells, and OVA-specific CD8+ T cells after mJX-594 treatment. Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 6 per group). ** p < 0.005. LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; mJX, mJX-594; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units; Veh, vehicle.
Figure 3. Cancer-specific CD8+ T cells and vaccinia virus-specific CD8+ T cells were efficiently activated and recruited to the tumor tissue. LLC-OVA cancer cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When tumors reached 50–60 mm3 in volume, the mice were intratumorally injected with vehicle or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6. The tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry on day 3 after the last treatment with mJX-594. (A) The proportion of vaccinia virus B8R-specific CD8+ T cells (Kb-TSYKFESV tetramer-positive) among CD3+ T cells. (B) The proportion of neoantigen (OVA)-specific T cells (Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer-positive) among CD3+ T cells. (C) Cell number per milligram of tumor mass of intratumoral CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B8R vaccinia-specific CD8+ T cells, and OVA-specific CD8+ T cells after mJX-594 treatment. Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 6 per group). ** p < 0.005. LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; mJX, mJX-594; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units; Veh, vehicle.
Biomedicines 10 00805 g003
Biomedicines 10 00805 g004 550
Figure 4. Combination treatment of anti-PD-1 with mJX-594 increased anti-tumor effects in a MC38 colon cancer model. (A) Combination treatment strategy. MC38 cancer cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When tumors reached 50–60 mm3 in volume, mice were intratumorally administered 1 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6. For combination therapy, anti-PD-1 antibody was intravenously injected five times at 3-day intervals, starting from the second treatment of mJX-594. Tumor growth monitoring until the end of the experiment (tumor volume ≤ 1500 mm3), and immunofluorescence microscopy images showing changes in immune cell infiltration on days 9 and 15 after the first mJX-594 treatment in MC38 tumor tissue. (B) Average tumor growth curve of MC38 tumor-bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment (n = 7 per group). Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Values are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (C) Individual tumor growth curves of MC38 tumor bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment. (n = 7 per group) (D) Representative images of CD8+ T cells, CD31+ blood vessels, CD11b+ myeloid cells in tissue sections. Scale bars, 200 mm. (E) Percentage of area infiltrated with leukocytes relative to the whole tumor, calculated using ImageJ software on days 9 and 15 after the first mJX-594 treatment. * p < 0.05. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for the analysis.
Figure 4. Combination treatment of anti-PD-1 with mJX-594 increased anti-tumor effects in a MC38 colon cancer model. (A) Combination treatment strategy. MC38 cancer cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When tumors reached 50–60 mm3 in volume, mice were intratumorally administered 1 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6. For combination therapy, anti-PD-1 antibody was intravenously injected five times at 3-day intervals, starting from the second treatment of mJX-594. Tumor growth monitoring until the end of the experiment (tumor volume ≤ 1500 mm3), and immunofluorescence microscopy images showing changes in immune cell infiltration on days 9 and 15 after the first mJX-594 treatment in MC38 tumor tissue. (B) Average tumor growth curve of MC38 tumor-bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment (n = 7 per group). Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Values are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (C) Individual tumor growth curves of MC38 tumor bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment. (n = 7 per group) (D) Representative images of CD8+ T cells, CD31+ blood vessels, CD11b+ myeloid cells in tissue sections. Scale bars, 200 mm. (E) Percentage of area infiltrated with leukocytes relative to the whole tumor, calculated using ImageJ software on days 9 and 15 after the first mJX-594 treatment. * p < 0.05. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for the analysis.
Biomedicines 10 00805 g004
Biomedicines 10 00805 g005 550
Figure 5. Tcf1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells including those directed against tumor-associated antigens, were increased by mJX-594 and further increased by anti-PD-1 antibody combination. LLC-OVA cancer cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When tumors reached 50–60 mm3 in volume, the mice were intratumorally injected with vehicle or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6. For combination therapy, anti-PD-1 antibody was intravenously injected five times at 3-day intervals, starting from the second treatment of mJX-594. Tumor growth was monitored until the end of the experiment (tumor volume ≤ 1500 mm3). The tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry at 9 days (D9), and splenocytes and bone marrow cells at 36 days (D36), after the first treatment with mJX-594. (A) Average tumor growth curve (left) and individual tumor growth curves (right) of LLC-OVA tumor-bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment (n = 7 per group). Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Values are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (C) Individual tumor growth curves of MC38 tumor-bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment. (n = 7 per group). (B,C) Relative proportions of memory precursor effector cells (IL-7Rα+KLRG1int) and short-lived effector cells (IL-7Rα−KLRG1high) among CD8+ T cells in spleen and tumor (D9). (D) Relative proportion among infiltrating leukocytes, the total cell numbers, and the number of cells per unit gram of tissue of KLRG1+ effector CD8+ T cells in spleen (D9). (E) Relative proportion of effector cells (TCF1−GzmB+) among CD8+ T cells in spleen (D9). (F,G) GzmB+ effector CD8+ T cells in spleen and tumor (D9). (H,I) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in spleen (D9). (J) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in tumor (D9). (K,L) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in spleen (D36). (M,N) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in tumor (D36). Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 6 per group). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. CO, combination therapy; GZMB, granzyme B; LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; JX, mJX-594; OVA, ovalbumin; PD, anti-PD-1; pfu, plaque-forming units; Vh, vehicle.
Figure 5. Tcf1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells including those directed against tumor-associated antigens, were increased by mJX-594 and further increased by anti-PD-1 antibody combination. LLC-OVA cancer cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When tumors reached 50–60 mm3 in volume, the mice were intratumorally injected with vehicle or 5 × 107 pfu of mJX-594 on days 0, 3, and 6. For combination therapy, anti-PD-1 antibody was intravenously injected five times at 3-day intervals, starting from the second treatment of mJX-594. Tumor growth was monitored until the end of the experiment (tumor volume ≤ 1500 mm3). The tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry at 9 days (D9), and splenocytes and bone marrow cells at 36 days (D36), after the first treatment with mJX-594. (A) Average tumor growth curve (left) and individual tumor growth curves (right) of LLC-OVA tumor-bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment (n = 7 per group). Group comparisons of tumor growth were carried out by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Values are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (C) Individual tumor growth curves of MC38 tumor-bearing mice after mJX-594 and anti-PD-1 combination treatment. (n = 7 per group). (B,C) Relative proportions of memory precursor effector cells (IL-7Rα+KLRG1int) and short-lived effector cells (IL-7Rα−KLRG1high) among CD8+ T cells in spleen and tumor (D9). (D) Relative proportion among infiltrating leukocytes, the total cell numbers, and the number of cells per unit gram of tissue of KLRG1+ effector CD8+ T cells in spleen (D9). (E) Relative proportion of effector cells (TCF1−GzmB+) among CD8+ T cells in spleen (D9). (F,G) GzmB+ effector CD8+ T cells in spleen and tumor (D9). (H,I) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in spleen (D9). (J) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in tumor (D9). (K,L) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in spleen (D36). (M,N) TCF1+PD-1+ stem-like CD8+ T cells in tumor (D36). Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 6 per group). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. CO, combination therapy; GZMB, granzyme B; LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; JX, mJX-594; OVA, ovalbumin; PD, anti-PD-1; pfu, plaque-forming units; Vh, vehicle.
Biomedicines 10 00805 g005
Biomedicines 10 00805 g006 550
Figure 6. Long-lived cancer neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells proliferated in response to antigen-loaded dendritic cells in situ. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental schedule. LLC-OVA cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When the tumor volume reached 50–60 mm3, the mice were intratumorally injected with 5 × 107 pfu mJX-594 five times at 3-day intervals. Intraperitoneal injection of 3 × 106 splenic dendritic cells (sDCs) that had been loaded with either vehicle or 100 nM SIINFEKL on day 36 or day 57 of the first mJX-594 injection. In vivo proliferation of cancer neoantigen-specific memory-like CD8+ T cells in response to antigen-loaded sDCs was measured by incorporation of EdU (10 mg/kg) after labeling the cells twice (once per day on day 1 and day 2 before analysis) and analyzed by Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer staining and Click-iT™ EdU Flow Cytometry Assay Kit (Kb-SIINFEKL+ EdU+). (B,C) Representative flowcytometric plot (B) and absolute number (C) of proliferating EdU+ cells among Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer-positive cells. Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 4–6 per group). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. BM, bone marrow; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; i.p., intraperitoneal; LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units; sDC, splenic dendritic cells.
Figure 6. Long-lived cancer neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells proliferated in response to antigen-loaded dendritic cells in situ. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental schedule. LLC-OVA cells were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When the tumor volume reached 50–60 mm3, the mice were intratumorally injected with 5 × 107 pfu mJX-594 five times at 3-day intervals. Intraperitoneal injection of 3 × 106 splenic dendritic cells (sDCs) that had been loaded with either vehicle or 100 nM SIINFEKL on day 36 or day 57 of the first mJX-594 injection. In vivo proliferation of cancer neoantigen-specific memory-like CD8+ T cells in response to antigen-loaded sDCs was measured by incorporation of EdU (10 mg/kg) after labeling the cells twice (once per day on day 1 and day 2 before analysis) and analyzed by Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer staining and Click-iT™ EdU Flow Cytometry Assay Kit (Kb-SIINFEKL+ EdU+). (B,C) Representative flowcytometric plot (B) and absolute number (C) of proliferating EdU+ cells among Kb-SIINFEKL dextramer-positive cells. Pooled data from two experiments are shown (n = 4–6 per group). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. BM, bone marrow; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; i.p., intraperitoneal; LLC-OVA, LLC expressing OVA; OVA, ovalbumin; pfu, plaque-forming units; sDC, splenic dendritic cells.
Biomedicines 10 00805 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeon, Y.-H.; Lee, N.; Yoo, J.; Won, S.; Shin, S.-k.; Kim, K.-H.; Park, J.-G.; Kim, M.-G.; Kim, H.-R.; Oh, K.; et al. Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Augments T Cell Factor 1-Positive Stem-like CD8+ T Cells, Which Underlies the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Combination Immunotherapy. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040805

AMA Style

Jeon Y-H, Lee N, Yoo J, Won S, Shin S-k, Kim K-H, Park J-G, Kim M-G, Kim H-R, Oh K, et al. Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Augments T Cell Factor 1-Positive Stem-like CD8+ T Cells, Which Underlies the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Combination Immunotherapy. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(4):805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeon, Yun-Hui, Namhee Lee, Jiyoon Yoo, Solchan Won, Suk-kyung Shin, Kyu-Hwan Kim, Jun-Gyu Park, Min-Gang Kim, Hang-Rae Kim, Keunhee Oh, and et al. 2022. "Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Augments T Cell Factor 1-Positive Stem-like CD8+ T Cells, Which Underlies the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Combination Immunotherapy" Biomedicines 10, no. 4: 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop