Next Article in Journal
Alpha-Lipoic Acid Supplementation Restores Early Age-Related Sensory and Endothelial Dysfunction in the Skin
Next Article in Special Issue
The Vehicles of Calcium Hydroxide Pastes Interfere with Antimicrobial Effect, Biofilm Polysaccharidic Matrix, and Pastes’ Physicochemical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
An Innovative PTD-IVT-mRNA Delivery Platform for CAR Immunotherapy of ErbB(+) Solid Tumor Neoplastic Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Growth and Biofilm Formation by Tannic Acid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines10112886
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Efficacy of an N-Acetylcysteine–Antibiotic Combination Therapy on Achromobacter xylosoxidans in a Cystic Fibrosis Sputum/Lung Cell Model

by
Aditi Aiyer
1,*,
Theerthankar Das
1,*,†,
Gregory S. Whiteley
1,2,3,
Trevor Glasbey
4,
Frederik H. Kriel
4,
Jessica Farrell
1,2 and
Jim Manos
1,†
1
Charles Perkins Centre, Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2
Whiteley Corporation, Level 5, 12 Mount Street North Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
3
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2566, Australia
4
Whiteley Corporation, 19-23 Laverick Avenue, Tomago, NSW 2322, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(11), 2886; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112886
Submission received: 11 August 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofilms at Interfaces)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a disorder causing dysfunctional ion transport resulting in the accumulation of viscous mucus. This environment fosters a chronic bacterial biofilm-associated infection in the airways. Achromobacter xylosoxidans, a gram-negative aerobic bacillus, has been increasingly associated with antibiotic resistance and chronic colonisation in CF. In this study, we aimed to create a reproducible model of CF infection using an artificial sputum medium (ASMDM-1) with bronchial (BEAS-2B) and macrophage (THP-1) cells to test A. xylosoxidans infection and treatment toxicity. This study was conducted in three distinct stages. First, the tolerance of BEAS-2B cell lines and two A. xylosoxidans strains against ASMDM-1 was optimised. Secondly, the cytotoxicity of combined therapy (CT) comprising N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the antibiotics colistin or ciprofloxacin was tested on cells alone in the sputum model in both BEAS-2B and THP-1 cells. Third, the efficacy of CT was assessed in the context of a bacterial infection within the live cell/sputum model. We found that a model using 20% ASMDM-1 in both cell populations tolerated a colistin–NAC-based CT and could significantly reduce bacterial loads in vitro (~2 log10 CFU/mL compared to untreated controls). This pilot study provides the foundation to study other bacterial opportunists that infect the CF lung to observe infection and CT kinetics. This model also acts as a springboard for more complex co-culture models.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease that is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein [1]. This results in dysfunctional transepithelial ion transport, which is critical to maintain appropriate ionic composition of the airway surface liquid (ASL). CF presents with dehydrated ASL and elevated bronchial mucus production [1]. This creates the ideal environment for opportunistic and progressively chronic bacterial colonisation. While the most common pathogen is Pseudomonas aeruginosa [2], in the past decade newer or emerging pathogens pose an increasing risk to patient treatment. One such pathogen is Achromobacter xylosoxidans.
A. xylosoxidans is a gram-negative aerobic bacillus that is ubiquitous in the environment. It has been associated with increased antibiotic resistance, lung inflammation in CF, and severe lung disease in adults [3,4]. The rate of colonisation of A. xylosoxidans varies between 2–17.9% worldwide; however, this figure could be underestimated as it is often confused with other pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, especially in laboratories that are unequipped to manage nuanced CF identification [5]. Our previous research has highlighted how the combination of the neutralised form of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (neutralised form referred to herein as “NACneutral”) enhances the effect of the antibiotics colistin and ciprofloxacin in certain clinical strains of A. xylosoxidans [6]. While it is understood through discriminative molecular tools that the presence of A. xylosoxidans is becoming more prevalent in recent years, current research lacks an understanding of chronic Achromobacter spp. colonisation and adaptation to the human lungs. Thus, further study is required to clarify its pathogenesis in CF lung disease [5].
Antibiotics are conventionally administered to manage CF bacterial infections. However, due to rising antibiotic resistance, different therapies or combined treatments need to be investigated. Recent studies have suggested that antibiotic activity may be improved by employing a combination therapy (CT) with antioxidants. NAC has been investigated against gram-negative opportunistic CF pathogens with promising results in vitro. Previous studies have investigated the related antioxidant, glutathione (GSH), on A549 cells following the addition of pyocyanin, which is a P. aeruginosa-released virulence factor [7]. NAC is recognised as a precursor to glutathione and so their activities are expected to be similar [8]. However, to our knowledge, NACneutral has not been investigated in a similar way to GSH in a reproducible model.
While most cell lines have been derived from virally transformed tissue, recent studies indicate they are an ideal surrogate system to monitor drug metabolism, toxicity, and infectious pathology [9] and provide an ethical alternative to animal testing [10,11]. The pulmonary epithelia are defined according to their region of isolation; upper, lower, and distal. Primary and secondary manifestations of infection and inflammation in CF occur in the lower respiratory tract, the trachea, and primary bronchi. While the gold standard to conduct testing would be primary human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells, their supply is limited and hard to come by [12]. The cell line BEAS-2B, an immortalised HBE cell line, is recognised as a valid cell type to screen chemical and biological agents to monitor cell differentiation [13,14,15]. Due to the similarities in gene expression of BEAS-2B to primary cultured cells, its use has currently expanded from testing of pollutants [16] and nanomaterials [17,18] to monitoring proinflammatory cytokine landscapes following infection [19].
In addition to cell models, modifications to in vitro culture mediums are now being developed to mimic host-specific nutrient profiles to uncover microbial pathogenicity [20]. The CF microenvironment is defined by excessive mucus, and to mimic this environment, we have formulated a modified artificial sputum medium (ASMDM-1) based on optimisation and refinement of the methods of Kirchner et al. (2012) [21], Sriramulu et al. (2010) [22], and Fung et al. (2010) [23]. This medium can approximate CF sputum in terms of concentrations of components and its physical properties. Previous studies have mainly used the medium to assess changes in the gene expression of P. aeruginosa chronic infections [23,24]. In a study by Wijers et al. (2016), a unique methodology was outlined where artificial sputum and A549 cells were used together to investigate Burkholderia cenocepacia infections in vitro [25]. However, their study did not assess the impact of a treatment of any kind following bacterial infection and focused exclusively on the use of alveolar cells. However, the literature has highlighted that CF opportunist species may also infect bronchial cells [26] and human macrophages [27] and bacterial colonisation may persist. CF epithelial cells are well known for their inability to mount an appropriate response to infection, allowing bacterial colonisation [28]. Lung macrophages are also a site of A. xylosoxidans infection [27]. Macrophages are sentinels of innate immunity with their main effector function being phagocytosis of bacterial cells [29]. While the literature has yet to confirm the site of infection of A. xylosoxidans in the CF lung, we hypothesised that it would have similar patterns of infection in HBE cells (BEAS-2B) and macrophages (THP-1).
In this study, we aim to build on the use of artificial sputum and cell lines by substituting a human bronchial cell line (BEAS-2B) and differentiated monocytes (THP-1) to investigate the effect of a CT on biofilms of the opportunistic CF species: A. xylosoxidans. Ultimately, our objective is to create a reproducible model for CF infection by using artificial sputum medium and BEAS-2B cells to test bacterial infection and treatment toxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Artificial Sputum Media (ASMDM-1)

Modified artificial sputum medium (ASMDM-1) was prepared using previously detailed methods [21,22,23]. ASMDM-1 contains mucin from porcine stomach (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), DNA from salmon testes (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), the iron chelator diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), “10× Salt solution” made using NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), KCl (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), CaCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), 5× Bovine Serum Albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia), 10× Casamino acids (Bacto, Sydney, Australia), and egg yolk emulsion (Oxoid, Sydney, Australia) at concentrations found in an average CF patient [30,31]. The components were homogenised in sterile dH2O and filter sterilised overnight at 4 °C. Media was warmed to room temperature prior to use. To create a 20% ASMDM-1 solution, 20% of pure ASMDM-1 was added to 80% Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) or 80% RPMI-1640 (RPMI) (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) and filter-sterilised through a 0.22 μm membrane filter.

2.2. A. xylosoxidans Strains and Growth Conditions

A. xylosoxidans ATCC 27061™ (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) and one representative CF strain of A. xylosoxidans (referred to as “AX 4365”) were used in this study (Table 1). CF strains isolated and identified using MALDI-TOF (Bruker, MA, United States) from patient sputum cultures (CF clinic, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia) were stored at −80 °C. A CF specialist at the clinic collected sputum from patients and isolated this clinical strain of A. xylosoxidans.
A. xylosoxidans isolates were grown in full strength in Tryptone soya broth (TSB, Oxoid, Sydney, Australia) and on Tryptone soya agar (TSA, ThermoFisher Scientific, Sydney, Australia) plates for 48 h (37 °C and 150 rpm). After 48 h growth, bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation (15 min, 1100 g, 20–24 °C) and washed once with 1 × phosphate buffer saline (PBS: 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl and 10 mM phosphate, pH 7.41) (POCD Healthcare, Sydney, Australia) and centrifuged again for 10 min as above, before being suspended in the relevant cell media below. “Suspended bacterial cultures” referred to herein were maintained at OD600nm 0.1 ± 0.02.

2.3. Bronchial and Differentiated Monocyte Cell Lines and Propagation Conditions

BEAS-2B cells were maintained in 1 mL aliquots at −80 °C. Cells were resuscitated and cultured using DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Sydney, Australia), penicillin (100 IU/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) (referred to as “PenStrep”). Cells were grown to confluence in T25 cell culture flasks (Corning, New York, NY, USA) at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2. To subculture, cells were harvested at 90% confluency using 0.12% v/v trypsin-EDTA (with phenol red) (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia). Cells were collected in conical 50 mL falcon tubes and centrifuged (7 min, 125 g, 20 °C). The cell pellet was resuspended in supplemented DMEM or diluted ASMDM-1 for further experiments.
THP-1 cells were maintained as above with the following exceptions. Cells were resuscitated and cultured in suspension using RPMI media, instead of DMEM, and supplemented with 10% v/v FBS and PenStrep. THP-1 suspension monocytes were differentiated into adherent macrophages by seeding at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL in a final concentration of 160 nM of phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) for 48 h. Cells were washed with fresh RPMI media before use in experiments.

2.4. Preparation of Treatments and Media formulation

CT formulations were derived from a previous publication [6] and are detailed in Table 2. The pH-adjusted NAC, NACneutral, was used for the following experiments. NACneutral, ciprofloxacin, and colistin stock solutions were prepared immediately before use by dissolving the respective powder in sterilised solutions of ASMDM-1 diluted in DMEM or RPMI, and in the case of ciprofloxacin, to a final concentration of 0.1 M HCl. All experiments were performed in 20% ASMDM-1.
To prepare fresh NACneutral stock solutions (97.9 mg/mL) each time before experiments, NAC powder (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) was dissolved in sterile DMEM, and the pH was adjusted to 6.5–7.4 with 0.1 M NaOH (Table S1). The antibiotic ciprofloxacin and colistin (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) stock solutions (900 μg/mL) were also prepared fresh before each experiment. Importantly, ciprofloxacin was specifically required to be dissolved in 0.1 M HCl which was created in DMEM. Both NAC and antibiotic solutions were filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane filter.

2.5. Optimal Tolerance of Bronchial Epithelial Cells (BEAS-2B) in ASMDM-1

The optimal concentration of ASMDM-1 in BEAS-2B was determined using previously detailed methods [25] with modifications. Briefly, BEAS-2B cells were seeded in 24-well plates (Corning Corp, New York, NY, USA) at 5 × 104 cells/mL. The plates were incubated at 37 °C (5% v/v CO2) until confluent. Following incubation, the media was discarded, and cells were washed once with 1 × PBS. DMEM or diluted ASMDM-1 was then added to the cells at varying concentrations; 0-, 20-, 40-, 60-, and 80% or 100% ASMDM-1. Following incubation, the supernatant was removed from all wells and plates and washed with 1 × PBS.
To assess cell viability, cells were detached from plates by washing with 1 × trypsin-EDTA at 37 °C for 10 min. Cell density and viability (% live cells) was measured using trypan blue staining using a hemocytometer (Neubauer, Stallikon, Switzerland). To assess cell metabolic viability, 0.05% w/v resazurin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney) was added to adherent cells, and incubated further at 37 °C with orbital shaking (150 RPM). After 24 h, the fluorescence intensity of the BEAS-2B cells were determined at Ex544nm and Em590nm using the Tecan infinite M1000 pro plate reader (Tecan, Grödig, Austria).

2.6. Cytotoxicity and Re-Growth of BEAS-2B and THP-1 following Treatment with Single and Combination Therapy

To determine the cytotoxicity of treatments on cells, the resazurin reduction assay was performed using metabolic viability as a surrogate for overall cell viability. In brief, BEAS-2B cells were seeded in 24-well plates to a density of 5 × 104 cells/mL and incubated at 37 °C until confluence was achieved. Cells were then washed with 1 × PBS and treated with NACneutral in 20% ASMDM-1 mixed with DMEM. Treatments were removed at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24 h and plates were washed twice with 1 × PBS. Treatments in 24-well plates were replaced with 0.05% w/v resazurin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) and after 6 h the fluorescence intensity of the BEAS-2B cells were determined at Ex544nm and Em590nm using the Tecan infinite M1000 pro plate reader.
Regrowth was performed on BEAS-2B cells only, as described in the cytotoxicity assay as above, with the following exceptions. Treatments made in 20% ASMDM-1 were added to the wells for 3 h. Following the removal of treatments, the media was replaced with the relevant 20% ASMDM-1 and cells were incubated for a further 24 h before the resazurin viability stain was added and viability quantified as above.
Following on from results of the above experiments, cytotoxicity following 3 h treatment was assessed in differentiated THP-1 cells. Cells were seeded, differentiated, and then washed twice with RPMI media to remove remaining PMA and treatments made in 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% RPMI medium were added for 3 h. After treatment, media was removed and replaced with 0.05% w/v resazurin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) and quantified as above.

2.7. Bacterial Mucin Adhesion Assay

Adhesion of A. xylosoxidans strains to mucin matrices was measured according to the modified methods [32,33]. In brief, 96-well microtiter plates were coated with 30 mg/mL porcine stomach mucin type IV (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) (made in 50 mM carbonate buffer) for 24 h at 4 °C. Control wells were carbonate buffer alone and were replaced with 1% (v/v) Tween20 × PBS to saturate uncoated binding sites for 1 h at room temperature. Wells were subsequently washed with 1 × PBS before 200 μL of diluted bacterial suspensions in 1 × PBS were added for 48 h (37 °C and 150 RPM) to allow for mature biofilm formation. Incubated alongside this, control wells with the same bacterial suspension were included without any mucin. After incubation, wells were washed in 0.05% Tween20 × PBS to remove any non-adherent cells before CT (detailed in Table 2) and were added for 3 h (37 °C and 150 RPM). Wells were then washed twice in 1 × PBS and heat fixed for 1 h in a 65 °C dry oven. Adhered cells were stained with 0.1 mg/mL crystal violet overnight (37 °C and 150 RPM) and washed twice with 1 × PBS to remove any excess stain. Excess stain was dissolved by adding 50 mM citrate buffer to all wells for 1 h and reading absorbance at 595 nm using a plate reader.

2.8. Bacterial Invasion Assay of Bronchial and Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Cells

BEAS-2B and THP-1 cells were seeded at 5 × 104 cells/mL or 2 × 105, respectively, in 24-well plates. BEAS-2B cells were grown until confluent, while THP-1 cells were differentiated in PMA for 48 h prior to use. Cells were washed with 1 × PBS twice. Diluted bacterial cultures were then added to the BEAS-2B cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of ~1 in 10 for 1 h. Following bacterial incubation, the cells were washed once with 1 × PBS. Gentamicin was added to wash the cells 3 times for a total of 30 min to kill any extracellular bacteria. Cells were then treated with CT (outlined in Table 2) for 3 h. Following treatment, cells were then washed twice with 1 × PBS and treated with Triton X-100 (0.4% vol/vol) for 20 min to lyse epithelial cells and release intracellular bacteria. A Whitley automatic spiral plater (WASP) was used (Don Whitley Scientific, Bingley, West Yorkshire, UK) to establish a colony-forming unit (CFU/mL) count. The WASP automatically plated 50 μL of serially diluted bacterial suspension on TSA plates. Plates where incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in a static incubator, following which the plate colonies were enumerated and expressed as CFU/mL.

2.9. Statistical Data Analysis

Statistical significance difference was analysed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 (San Diego, CA, USA). Data were analysed using unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction) and multiple comparison tests (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s correction). The difference was considered statistically significant if cut-offs were p > 0.05 (n), p ≤ 0.05 (*). All experiments were conducted at least in n = 3 biological replicates.

3. Results

3.1. BEAS-2B Cell Viability Decreases with Increasing Concentrations of ASMDM-1

ASMDM has been used to simulate the presence of mucus in the CF lung [23,24,34]; specifically the modified version, ASMDM-1, as used in this study. Cell viability and density quantification were used as supplementary methods to determine the concentration of ASMDM-1 that could be tolerated by BEAS-2B cells (Figure 1). All statistical comparisons were performed against this untreated (0% ASMDM-1) control. Untreated cells had 100% viability evidenced by 100% metabolic viability and a 1.8 × 106 cells/mL live cell density. These results were mirrored in Figure 1b, where cell density began to reduce significantly from 40% ASMDM-1 or higher. There was no significant difference between 20% ASMDM-1 and 0% live cell control. Therefore, the following experiments were performed in 20% ASMDM-1 (80% DMEM) media.

3.2. BEAS-2B Cells Regrow following Three-Hour Treatment Time

The duration that the BEAS-2B cells in 20% ASMDM-1 could withstand and regrow following treatment challenge was assessed by determining resazurin metabolic viability over time (Figure 2). As the cytotoxicity of the antioxidant component, NACneutral, has not yet been determined in this model, the results in Figure 2a highlight the cytotoxicity of all individual NACneutral concentrations (1-, 2-, 4.1-, and 8.2 mg/mL over 24 h). The cells experienced an initial decrease in viability at the one-hour time point but were able to recover at the three-hour time point and eventually maintained nearly 100% viability for 1- and 2 mg/mL concentrations. Conversely, viability dropped to 56.4% and 48.3% for 4.1- and 8.2 mg/mL NACneutral, respectively.
The three-hour time point was chosen in order to observe the ability of cells to restore viability for all treatment options, including NACneutral treatments (Figure 2b). Following a three-hour treatment challenge, represented by red bars, viability was measured after 24 h, represented by yellow bars. Cells subjected to CT did not experience significant decreases in viability both in the initial challenge and in the regrowth phase, with the exception of combinations G and J, both colistin based CTs. Combinations G and J both significantly decreased in viability after three hours to 82.9% and 44.3%, respectively. However, both conditions recovered to 100% viability following regrowth after 24 h.
There was a significant decrease in viability for most conditions, especially for all individual antibiotic treatments (p ≤ 0.05). However, cells were able to recover viability to 100% following 24 h in 20% ASMDM-1 growth medium. There were some exceptions to this, such as for 64 μg/mL ciprofloxacin, where viability significantly decreased to 27.5% at three hours and recovered to 85% after 24 h. Similarly, both 8- and 16 μg/mL colistin treatments decreased cell viability to 39.1% and 32.9% but this recovered to 70% for both conditions after 24 h (Figure 2b).

3.3. THP-1 Cells Maintain Metabolic Viability after Three Hours of Combination Treatment

THP-1 cells were subjected to a three-hour treatment challenge with CT and individual components to assess metabolic viability against an untreated control (Figure 3). Application of treatments on differentiated THP-1 cells resulted in a significant reduction in metabolic viability, specifically for individual antibiotic treatments with average reductions of 65% compared to the untreated control (p < 0.05). Similarly, significant reductions (p < 0.05) ranging from 11–20% were observed in NACneutral individual treatments compared with the untreated control. However, when both components were applied in combination, all but one combination, F, did not experience any significant reductions in viability after three hours (p > 0.05) and remained metabolically viable compared to the untreated control.

3.4. Mucin Provides a Suitable Substrate for Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation

Adhesion of A. xylosoxidans to mucin and its subsequent response to a three-hour treatment challenge was measured relative to control non-coated wells and has been expressed as % bacterial biomass in Figure 4.
In Figure 4a, significant reductions in biomass were observed when using colistin-based CT, with an average percentage biomass reduction of 65% from the normalised untreated control. These reductions were also significant in comparison to the individual components of the CT, with an average percentage biomass reduction of 20% recorded in both NACneutral and colistin components (p ≤ 0.05).
The representative clinical strain AX 4365 as shown in Figure 4b had fewer significant reductions compared with its ATCC counterpart. However, all significant reductions in biomass were identified with colistin combinations; specifically, E, F, and I. Average percentage biomass reductions of 70% were recorded compared with the normalised, untreated controls. When individual components of CT were compared, average biomass reductions of 7% were recorded in NACneutral components and 18% for colistin components (p ≤ 0.05).

3.5. A. xylosoxidans Intracellular Bacterial Load Is Not Universally Reduced When Assessed in BEAS-2B + ASMDM-1 Cell Model

Similar to Section 3.6, BEAS-2B cells were infected with A. xylosoxidans strains, and following a three-hour treatment exposure, bacterial loads were also significantly reduced predominately in colistin-based CT (Figure 5). Bacterial load reductions were compared against the untreated control and both individual components of the combination to determine statistical significance.
In Figure 5a, ATCC 27061 showed greater significant reductions when using all 16 μg/mL colistin + NACneutral CT, as seen in combinations H, I, and J. All combinations had a ~1.5 log10 reduction compared with untreated controls (p ≤ 0.05) and also displayed synergy during planktonic synergy testing. The other combination, E, was also a colistin-based CT and displayed synergy during planktonic testing and had similar ~1.5 log10 reductions as other combinations.
In Figure 5b, strain AX 4365 did not show significant reductions in comparison to Figure 5a with only one combination leading to significant reduction (D). This was a 64 μg/mL ciprofloxacin combination which originally displayed indifference during checkerboard synergy planktonic testing. However, its reduction was significant (p ≤ 0.05) with a ~2 log10 reduction compared with the untreated control.

3.6. Synergistic Colistin Combination Therapy Reduced A. xylosoxidans Invasion in THP-1 Cells

To determine intracellular invasion in THP-1 macrophages, differentiated cells were infected with A. xylosoxidans for one hour followed by a three-hour treatment exposure, where bacterial loads were significantly reduced, predominantly in colistin-based CT (Figure 6).
ATCC 27061 successfully invaded the THP-1 cells and intracellular bacterial loads were reduced compared with both untreated control and individual components of the treatments D, H, and I (Figure 6a). Combination J was additive in planktonic states but did not display a significant intracellular bacteria reduction when compared to 16 μg/mL colistin alone (p > 0.05). Combinations H and I both displayed synergy in planktonic states which was translated into significant reductions of ~2 log10 compared with the untreated control in this cell + (ASMDM-1) model. Combination I, while considered indifferent under planktonic conditions, showed significant reductions of ~0.5 log10 compared with the untreated control (p ≤ 0.05).
Strain AX 4365 showed reductions similar to its ATCC counterpart (Figure 6b). The CFU/mL reductions were mirrored here for combinations H and I, with two ciprofloxacin combinations, B and C, also resulting in significant reductions. The colistin-based combinations displayed synergy in planktonic cultures also resulting in significant ~2 log10 reductions compared with the untreated control. Combinations B and C initially displayed indifference in planktonic cultures; however, their ~2 log10 reductions compared with the untreated control were considerably significant despite the initially displayed indifference (p ≤ 0.05).

4. Discussion

The goal of this study was to optimise an in vitro cell culture plus ASMDM-1 model as a surrogate to assess the efficacy of antioxidant-based CT on A. xylosoxidans infection. A hallmark of the CF microenvironment is the accumulation of mucus [35]. Therefore, to mimic this environment [32], we substituted general growth media for diluted ASMDM-1 [23]. As such, this study allowed for a more accurate assessment of CF by bringing together two previous studies [6,25]. This study assesses the impact of synergistic and additive CT in an ASMDM-1 model using bronchial cells and lung macrophages to model A. xylosoxidans infection. We have separated this study into three distinct stages. Firstly, optimisation of the bronchial/bacterial cell to sputum ratio. Secondly, testing cytotoxicity of treatments on cells alone in the optimised sputum model, and, thirdly, assessment of CT in the context of bacterial infection within the live cell/sputum model. While the site of infection of A. xylosoxidans in the lungs is yet to be confirmed in either bronchial epithelial cells or macrophages, we have chosen these two cell populations to separately model infection and treatment. To avoid introducing too many external variables in the form of diverse clinical strains, only two A. xylosoxidans strains were tested.
Our model was optimised based on the concentration of ASMDM-1 that could be tolerated by both BEAS-2B cells and bacteria. As a result, 20% ASMDM-1 was chosen to maintain cells as it showed no significant differences in viability between the conventional growth medium control in cells alone (Figure 1) (Figure S3), bacterial growth alone (Figure S2), and did not hinder imaging capabilities (Figure S1). These factors formed the cornerstone of the sputum model as it allowed us to monitor treatment cytotoxicity in viable cells in subsequent experiments.
We then wanted to optimise the treatment time with CT by determining its cytotoxicity within the lung cell/ASMDM-1 model on both BEAS-2B and THP-1 cells without bacteria. Unlike a biofilm-only in vitro model, live cells pose a unique challenge in that most treatments would not likely be tolerated for extensive periods of time. As such, the “treatment time” was defined as the threshold where cells may experience cytotoxicity but still could maintain viability to regrow when the treatment was replaced with growth medium (Figure 2). Cytotoxicity testing is a requirement of most regulatory authorities. The appropriate in vitro methods have been reviewed by Liu et al. [36], who stipulate that any new antimicrobials must be tested in a live cell model for a period of 24 h. As ciprofloxacin and colistin are already regularly used clinically [37], we chose NACneutral as our signpost for cytotoxicity as its use at this neutralised pH has not yet been approved for inhaled human therapy [38]. Our results showed that BEAS-2B cells tolerated NACneutral well over a time course of 24 h (Figure 2a). However, we chose to further investigate regrowth of cells following the three hours of combination treatment as the BEAS-2B maintained cell viability close to or above 50% using individual treatments. Following the three-hour treatment challenge, all conditions were able to recover to 100% viability in both BEAS-2B (Figure 2b) and THP-1 cells (Figure 3), even in the cases of mildly acidic pH ciprofloxacin CT. This result confirmed that within the 20% ASMDM-1/lung cell model, cells could retain their viability following a three-hour treatment time. This optimised cell and treatment model allows us to monitor A. xylosoxidans intracellular infections in subsequent experiments.
We then confirmed the ability of A. xylosoxidans to adhere and colonise to the mucin component in ASMDM-1 and the impact of the three-hour treatment on the resultant biomass (Figure 4). We used Type IV porcine stomach mucin-coated plates, the structure of which is similar to the human mucin molecule, and MUC5AC [39] to provide a substrate for A. xylosoxidans biomass formation. Following the three-hour treatment time, there was a significant reduction in biomass using colistin-based CT for all strains (Figure 4a,b), which suggested that bacteria may colonise in the sputum layer of the model and the CT are able to reduce biomass.
Finally, we tested the effect of CT on A. xylosoxidans infection within the cell/sputum model in BEAS-2B and THP-1 cells (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Our research question was: did the CT conditions significantly lower bacterial loads in comparison to the untreated control and both individual components of the CT? Significance was only displayed in those instances. We compared any significant combinations from this study with previously published data [6], assigning relevant synergy classifications. In THP-1 cells, there were significant and synergistic reductions in ATCC 27061 and AX 4365 bacterial loads when the colistin-based combinations, H and I, were used (Figure 6). In BEAS-2B cells, while the combinations H, I, and J, were able to reduce ATCC 27061 bacterial loads, this was not mirrored in AX 4365 where only one ciprofloxacin-based combination, D, could reduce bacterial loads (Figure 5). Thus, while colistin-based CT may provide adequate reductions in some cases, it does not address all A. xylosoxidans infections in the CF lung due to strain variability.
The main benefit of conducting work in a live cell model versus a flow cell or microplate is that the cells provide a live medium with changing bacterial dynamics. ASMDM-1 was used to create a replicable model and provides the benefit of ease of access and consistency due to defined concentrations in the formulation. These two features are not present if using an extracted sputum sample, which is complicated by patient-to-patient variation [34,40].
A. xylosoxidans has received less attention than other CF pathogens, but is emerging as an opportunist, causing progressive lung dysfunction in chronic infection [41]. The cell/sputum model could provide greater insights into the A. xylosoxidans genes affected during colonisation and treatment challenge. In a study by Jakobsen et al. (2013), the entire genome of pathogenic A. xylosoxidans NH44784-1996 was studied [42]. The A. xylosoxidans genome contained the pgaABCD operon. This encodes the polysaccharide β-1,6-GlcNAc, involved in cell-to-cell adherence and cell surface adherence, and contributed to biofilm formation [43] within the cell-sputum model.
One limitation is the chosen ASMDM-1 concentration of 20%. In the CF lung, the defective CFTR ion transport results in characteristic static mucus accumulation which eventually progresses to bronchiectasis [44]. In our in vitro study, however, we required viable cells in which to study bacterial infection, which meant using “suffocating” sputum concentrations was not possible. One could rectify this by conducting optimisation using gas-permeable wells to regulate oxygen bioavailability to cells [25,45]. However, this poses the same issue of misrepresentation of the CF lung where the mucus created varied O2 gradients [46] and patients generally report chronic hypoxemia [47,48]. As such, in vitro models will always have their limitations, but without them it is nearly impossible to derive any inkling of infection capacity or treatment efficacy.
Future work could assess other emergent bacterial species, such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [49], and improving the model in which testing is performed. A. xylosoxidans mucin adhesion suggests an investigation into relative bacterial colonisation in the ASMDM-1 layer versus the adherent cell layer is warranted. This could be accomplished by fluorescently tagging the bacteria and performing live cell confocal microscopy to monitor colonisation and eventual biofilm formation [4,50,51]. Another future direction could be the co-culture of THP-1 and BEAS-2B cells to investigate the cell-to-cell signalling and proinflammatory [19] responses to bacterial infection, thus shedding light on how CT either mitigates or abrogates cell processes. Studies by Li et al. (2012) assessed the effect of asbestos particles in transwells on the proinflammatory responses of THP-1 cells in the apical chamber and their effects on bronchial epithelial cells in the basolateral chamber [19]. This model may be altered to suit specific requirements and could highlight the impact of cytokine responses and oxidative stress.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study has optimised a cell/artificial sputum model using two relevant lung cell populations, BEAS-2B and THP-1, to study the effects of CT on A. xylosoxidans infection. We found that colistin-based CT is well tolerated by both cell types and may significantly reduce bacterial loads in vitro. This pilot study provides a foundation to study other bacterial opportunists that infect the CF lung to observe infection and for recording CT effectiveness. This model can also act as a springboard to more complex co-culture models and eventually more streamlined, optimised, and budget-friendly testing in air–liquid interface cell models [52].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10112886/s1, Table S1: Assessment of changes in pH of media formulations. Figure S1 Images of tolerance of BEAS-2B cells against ASMDM-1. Figure S2: Assessment of ASMDM-1 effect on A. xylosoxidans bacterial growth. Figure S3: Wound healing not significantly different in DMEM alone versus 20% ASMDM-1. References [53,54] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.A.; methodology, A.A.; formal analysis, A.A.; investigation, A.A. resources, T.D., J.F., J.M. and G.S.W.; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A., G.S.W., T.G., F.H.K., J.F., T.D. and J.M.; visualisation, A.A.; supervision, T.D. and J.M.; project administration, A.A., J.F., T.D. and J.M.; funding acquisition, T.D., J.M. and G.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Commercial Development and Industry Partnership, grant number CT20584, University of Sydney and Whiteley Corporation and Department of Industry, Innovation, and Science (Innovative Manufacturing CRC Ltd.) and Whiteley Corporation co-funded project grant “A Novel approach to Biofilm Disruption and Removal”, grant number IMCRC/WLY/08052019.1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Ethical approval was granted for collection of A. xylosoxidans clinical isolate AX 4365 (Protocol X16-0481, HREC/16/RPAH/690, SSA/18/RPAH/201). Informed consent was signed and obtained from subjects involved in the study where A. xylosoxidans strains were collected.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bradley Watson from the Microbiology Department at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for performing susceptibility testing of the strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors Gregory S. Whiteley, Jessica Farrell, Frederik H. Kriel, and Trevor O. Glasbey are employed by Whiteley Corporation. All other authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Elborn, J.S. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2016, 388, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hatziagorou, E.; Orenti, A.; Drevinek, P.; Kashirskaya, N.; Mei-Zahav, M.; De Boeck, K.; ECFSPR. Changing epidemiology of the respiratory bacteriology of patients with cystic fibrosis-data from the European cystic fibrosis society patient registry. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2020, 19, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Baets, F.; Schelstraete, P.; Van Daele, S.; Haerynck, F.; Vaneechoutte, M. Achromobacter xylosoxidans in cystic fibrosis: Prevalence and clinical relevance. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2007, 6, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hansen, C.R.; Pressler, T.; Nielsen, K.G.; Jensen, P.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Høiby, N. Inflammation in Achromobacter xylosoxidans infected cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2010, 9, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Firmida, M.C.; Pereira, R.H.; Silva, E.A.; Marques, E.A.; Lopes, A.J. Clinical impact of Achromobacter xylosoxidans colonization/infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2016, 49, e5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Aiyer, A.; Visser, S.K.; Bye, P.; Britton, W.J.; Whiteley, G.S.; Glasbey, T.; Kriel, F.H.; Farrell, J.; Das, T.; Manos, J. Effect of N-Acetylcysteine in Combination with Antibiotics on the Biofilms of Three Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens of Emerging Importance. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Das, T.; Simone, M.; Ibugo, A.I.; Witting, P.K.; Manefield, M.; Manos, J. Glutathione Enhances Antibiotic Efficiency and Effectiveness of DNase I in Disrupting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms While Also Inhibiting Pyocyanin Activity, Thus Facilitating Restoration of Cell Enzymatic Activity, Confluence and Viability. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Aldini, G.; Altomare, A.; Baron, G.; Vistoli, G.; Carini, M.; Borsani, L.; Sergio, F. N-Acetylcysteine as an antioxidant and disulphide breaking agent: The reasons why. Free Radic. Res. 2018, 52, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Guguen-Guillouzo, C.; Corlu, A.; Guillouzo, A. Stem cell-derived hepatocytes and their use in toxicology. Toxicology 2010, 270, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Upadhyay, S.; Palmberg, L. Air-Liquid Interface: Relevant In Vitro Models for Investigating Air Pollutant-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 2018, 164, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gibb, S. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. Reprod. Toxicol. 2008, 25, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Awatade, N.T.; Wong, S.L.; Hewson, C.K.; Fawcett, L.K.; Kicic, A.; Jaffe, A.; Waters, S.A. Human Primary Epithelial Cell Models: Promising Tools in the Era of Cystic Fibrosis Personalized Medicine. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Han, X.; Na, T.; Wu, T.; Yuan, B.Z. Human lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells exhibit characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gillette, D.D.; Shah, P.A.; Cremer, T.; Gavrilin, M.A.; Besecker, B.Y.; Sarkar, A.; Knoell, D.L.; Cormet-Boyaka, E.; Wewers, M.D.; Butchar, J.P.; et al. Analysis of human bronchial epithelial cell proinflammatory response to Burkholderia cenocepacia infection: Inability to secrete il-1β. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 3691–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gruenert, D.C.; Willems, M.; Cassiman, J.J.; Frizzell, R.A. Established cell lines used in cystic fibrosis research. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2004, 3 (Suppl. 2), 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Persoz, C.; Achard, S.; Momas, I.; Seta, N. Inflammatory response modulation of airway epithelial cells exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 211, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Veljkovic, E.; Jiricny, J.; Menigatti, M.; Rehrauer, H.; Han, W. Chronic exposure to cigarette smoke condensate in vitro induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition-like changes in human bronchial epithelial cells, BEAS-2B. Toxicol. In Vitro 2011, 25, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garcia-Canton, C.; Minet, E.; Anadon, A.; Meredith, C. Metabolic characterization of cell systems used in in vitro toxicology testing: Lung cell system BEAS-2B as a working example. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27, 1719–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, M.; Gunter, M.E.; Fukagawa, N.K. Differential activation of the inflammasome in THP-1 cells exposed to chrysotile asbestos and Libby “six-mix” amphiboles and subsequent activation of BEAS-2B cells. Cytokine 2012, 60, 718–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neve, R.L.; Carrillo, B.D.; Phelan, V.V. Impact of Artificial Sputum Medium Formulation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Secondary Metabolite Production. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e0025021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kirchner, S.; Fothergill, J.L.; Wright, E.A.; James, C.E.; Mowat, E.; Winstanley, C. Use of artificial sputum medium to test antibiotic efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in conditions more relevant to the cystic fibrosis lung. J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 64, e3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sriramulu, D.D. Amino Acids Enhance Adaptive Behaviour of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung Environment. Microbiol. Insights 2010, 3, MBI.S4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fung, C.; Naughton, S.; Turnbull, L.; Tingpej, P.; Rose, B.; Arthur, J.; Hu, H.; Harmer, C.; Harbour, C.; Hassett, D.J.; et al. Gene expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a mucin-containing synthetic growth medium mimicking cystic fibrosis lung sputum. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Klare, W.; Das, T.; Ibugo, A.; Buckle, E.; Manefield, M.; Manos, J. Glutathione-Disrupted Biofilms of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Exhibit an Enhanced Antibiotic Effect and a Novel Biofilm Transcriptome. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 4539–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wijers, C.D.; Vagedes, R.; Weingart, C. A novel method for investigating Burkholderia cenocepacia infections in patients with cystic fibrosis and other chronic diseases of the airways. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bhagirath, A.Y.; Li, Y.; Somayajula, D.; Dadashi, M.; Badr, S.; Duan, K. Cystic fibrosis lung environment and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. BMC Pulm. Med. 2016, 16, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pickrum, A.M.; DeLeon, O.; Dirck, A.; Tessmer, M.H.; Riegert, M.O.; Biller, J.A.; Ledeboer, N.A.; Kirby, J.R.; Frank, D.W. Achromobacter xylosoxidans Cellular Pathology Is Correlated with Activation of a Type III Secretion System. Infect. Immun. 2020, 88, e00136-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Balloy, V.; Koshy, R.; Perra, L.; Corvol, H.; Chignard, M.; Guillot, L.; Scaria, V. Bronchial Epithelial Cells from Cystic Fibrosis Patients Express a Specific Long Non-coding RNA Signature upon. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hirayama, D.; Iida, T.; Nakase, H. The Phagocytic Function of Macrophage-Enforcing Innate Immunity and Tissue Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sriramulu, D.D.; Lunsdorf, H.; Lam, J.S.; Romling, U. Microcolony formation: A novel biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the cystic fibrosis lung. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 54, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wright, E.A.; Fothergill, J.L.; Paterson, S.; Brockhurst, M.A.; Winstanley, C. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of some antibiotics can drive diversification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations in artificial sputum medium. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Filipic, B.; Malesevic, M.; Vasiljevic, Z.; Lukic, J.; Novovic, K.; Kojic, M.; Jovcic, B. Uncovering Differences in Virulence Markers Associated with Achromobacter Species of CF and Non-CF Origin. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Muñoz-Provencio, D.; Llopis, M.; Antolín, M.; de Torres, I.; Guarner, F.; Pérez-Martínez, G.; Monedero, V. Adhesion properties of Lactobacillus casei strains to resected intestinal fragments and components of the extracellular matrix. Arch. Microbiol. 2009, 191, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aiyer, A.; Manos, J. The Use of Artificial Sputum Media to Enhance Investigation and Subsequent Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis Bacterial Infections. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rubin, B.K.; Thornton, D.J. Dropping acid: Why is cystic fibrosis mucus abnormal? Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 52, 1802057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, X.; Rodeheaver, D.P.; White, J.C.; Wright, A.M.; Walker, L.M.; Zhang, F.; Shannon, S. A comparison of in vitro cytotoxicity assays in medical device regulatory studies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 97, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brodt, A.M.; Stovold, E.; Zhang, L. Inhaled antibiotics for stable non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Blasi, F.; Page, C.; Rossolini, G.M.; Pallecchi, L.; Matera, M.G.; Rogliani, P.; Cazzola, M. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on biofilms: Implications for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Respir. Med. 2016, 117, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Barmpatsalou, V.; Dubbelboer, I.R.; Rodler, A.; Jacobson, M.; Karlsson, E.; Pedersen, B.L.; Bergström, C.A.S. Physiological properties, composition and structural profiling of porcine gastrointestinal mucus. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2021, 169, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Palmer, K.L.; Aye, L.M.; Whiteley, M. Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8079–8087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Marsac, C.; Berdah, L.; Thouvenin, G.; Sermet-Gaudelus, I.; Corvol, H. Achromobacter xylosoxidans airway infection is associated with lung disease severity in children with cystic fibrosis. ERJ Open Res. 2021, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jakobsen, T.H.; Hansen, M.A.; Jensen, P.; Hansen, L.; Riber, L.; Cockburn, A.; Kolpen, M.; Rønne Hansen, C.; Ridderberg, W.; Eickhardt, S.; et al. Complete genome sequence of the cystic fibrosis pathogen Achromobacter xylosoxidans NH44784-1996 complies with important pathogenic phenotypes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, X.; Preston, J.F.; Romeo, T. The pgaABCD locus of Escherichia coli promotes the synthesis of a polysaccharide adhesin required for biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 2724–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Button, B.M.; Button, B. Structure and function of the mucus clearance system of the lung. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013, 3, a009720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Naciri, M.; Kuystermans, D.; Al-Rubeai, M. Monitoring pH and dissolved oxygen in mammalian cell culture using optical sensors. Cytotechnology 2008, 57, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Worlitzsch, D.; Tarran, R.; Ulrich, M.; Schwab, U.; Cekici, A.; Meyer, K.C.; Birrer, P.; Bellon, G.; Berger, J.; Weiss, T.; et al. Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 109, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fraser, K.L.; Tullis, D.E.; Sasson, Z.; Hyland, R.H.; Thornley, K.S.; Hanly, P.J. Pulmonary hypertension and cardiac function in adult cystic fibrosis: Role of hypoxemia. Chest 1999, 115, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ramsey, B.W.; Pepe, M.S.; Quan, J.M.; Otto, K.L.; Montgomery, A.B.; Williams-Warren, J.; Vasiljev, K.M.; Borowitz, D.; Bowman, C.M.; Marshall, B.C.; et al. Intermittent administration of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis. Cystic Fibrosis Inhaled Tobramycin Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Menetrey, Q.; Sorlin, P.; Jumas-Bilak, E.; Chiron, R.; Dupont, C.; Marchandin, H. Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Emerging Pathogens Well-Armed for Life in the Cystic Fibrosis Patients’ Lung. Genes 2021, 12, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, L.; Li, Y.; Lim, T.M.; Pan, S.Q. GFP-aided confocal laser scanning microscopy can monitor Agrobacterium tumefaciens cell morphology and gene expression associated with infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 179, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Stretton, S.; Techkarnjanaruk, S.; McLennan, A.M.; Goodman, A.E. Use of green fluorescent protein to tag and investigate gene expression in marine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 2554–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sheikh, Z.; Bradbury, P.; Pozzoli, M.; Young, P.M.; Ong, H.X.; Traini, D. An in vitro model for assessing drug transport in cystic fibrosis treatment: Characterisation of the CuFi-1 cell line. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2020, 156, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suarez-Arnedo, A.; Torres Figueroa, F.; Clavijo, C.; Arbeláez, P.; Cruz, J.C.; Muñoz-Camargo, C. An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jonkman, J.E.; Cathcart, J.A.; Xu, F.; Bartolini, M.E.; Amon, J.E.; Stevens, K.M.; Colarusso, P. An introduction to the wound healing assay using live-cell microscopy. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2014, 8, 440–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 10 02886 g001 550
Figure 1. The effect of ASMDM-1 on BEAS-2B cell density and viability. BEAS-2B cells were grown to confluence in 24-well plates and exposed to varying concentrations of ASMDM-1 diluted in DMEM media. After 24 h incubation, the (a) cell viability (resazurin metabolic viability %) and (b) cell density (cells/mL) were compared with a normalised, untreated control. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Significance cut-offs were p > 0.05 (n), p ≤ 0.05 (*). Data represent an average of n = 3 biological replicates.
Figure 1. The effect of ASMDM-1 on BEAS-2B cell density and viability. BEAS-2B cells were grown to confluence in 24-well plates and exposed to varying concentrations of ASMDM-1 diluted in DMEM media. After 24 h incubation, the (a) cell viability (resazurin metabolic viability %) and (b) cell density (cells/mL) were compared with a normalised, untreated control. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Significance cut-offs were p > 0.05 (n), p ≤ 0.05 (*). Data represent an average of n = 3 biological replicates.
Biomedicines 10 02886 g001
Biomedicines 10 02886 g002 550
Figure 2. BEAS-2B cells experience minimal cytotoxicity following three-hour combination treatment challenge. BEAS-2B cells were grown to confluence and the cytotoxicity of NACneutral CT made in 20% ASMDM-1 (as detailed in Table 1) was tested. (a) Cytotoxicity of NACneutral was measured using resazurin metabolic viability staining over 24 h to determine viability. (b) Regrowth following three hours of treatment with CT and individual components were assessed after 24 h. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction).
Figure 2. BEAS-2B cells experience minimal cytotoxicity following three-hour combination treatment challenge. BEAS-2B cells were grown to confluence and the cytotoxicity of NACneutral CT made in 20% ASMDM-1 (as detailed in Table 1) was tested. (a) Cytotoxicity of NACneutral was measured using resazurin metabolic viability staining over 24 h to determine viability. (b) Regrowth following three hours of treatment with CT and individual components were assessed after 24 h. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction).
Biomedicines 10 02886 g002
Biomedicines 10 02886 g003 550
Figure 3. THP-1 cells maintained metabolic viability after three-hour combination therapy treatment challenge. THP-1 cells were grown in suspension until a density of 2–4 × 105 cells/mL was achieved. Cells were differentiated by seeding into 24-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL in a final concentration of 160 nM PMA for 48 h. Cells were washed and combinations were added to a concentration of 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% RPMI medium for three hours and metabolic viability was measured using resazurin staining. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Figure 3. THP-1 cells maintained metabolic viability after three-hour combination therapy treatment challenge. THP-1 cells were grown in suspension until a density of 2–4 × 105 cells/mL was achieved. Cells were differentiated by seeding into 24-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL in a final concentration of 160 nM PMA for 48 h. Cells were washed and combinations were added to a concentration of 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% RPMI medium for three hours and metabolic viability was measured using resazurin staining. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Biomedicines 10 02886 g003
Biomedicines 10 02886 g004 550
Figure 4. Mucin substrate-enhances A. xylosoxidans bacterial adhesion and reduced biomass occurred after a three-hour treatment challenge. Porcine mucin (Type IV)-coated plates were used to monitor bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation. Briefly, diluted bacterial cultures were added to mucin-coated wells at an OD600 0.1 ± 0.02 for 48 h. Wells were washed with 1 × PBS. Treatments prepared in 1 × PBS were added for three hours. Wells were washed three times before heat fixing in a dry oven at 65 °C for one hour. Wells were stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet for 24 h and de-stained with citrate buffer for one hour prior to absorbance being read at 595 nm. Biomass was quantified against a normalised, untreated control and displayed as “% biofilm biomass”. Strains shown are (a) ATCC 27061 and (b) AX 4365. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) (*) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Significance was only displayed if CT was significant compared with untreated controls and both individual components of CT. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Figure 4. Mucin substrate-enhances A. xylosoxidans bacterial adhesion and reduced biomass occurred after a three-hour treatment challenge. Porcine mucin (Type IV)-coated plates were used to monitor bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation. Briefly, diluted bacterial cultures were added to mucin-coated wells at an OD600 0.1 ± 0.02 for 48 h. Wells were washed with 1 × PBS. Treatments prepared in 1 × PBS were added for three hours. Wells were washed three times before heat fixing in a dry oven at 65 °C for one hour. Wells were stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet for 24 h and de-stained with citrate buffer for one hour prior to absorbance being read at 595 nm. Biomass was quantified against a normalised, untreated control and displayed as “% biofilm biomass”. Strains shown are (a) ATCC 27061 and (b) AX 4365. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) (*) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Significance was only displayed if CT was significant compared with untreated controls and both individual components of CT. Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Biomedicines 10 02886 g004
Biomedicines 10 02886 g005 550
Figure 5. Combination treatment challenge against A. xylosoxidans invasion in BEAS-2B + 20% ASMDM-1 cell model. Confluent BEAS-2B cells were washed and infected with OD600 0.1 ± 0.02 for one hour to allow for intracellular invasion. Following this, cells were washed thrice with 100 μg/mL gentamicin before addition of combinations in a final concentration of 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% DMEM medium for three hours. Cells were washed twice with 1 × PBS before being lysed and intracellular bacterial loads were enumerated using CFU/mL. (a) ATCC 27061 and (b) AX 4365. Correlation with planktonic synergy was determined previously and is denoted as (S) synergy and (I) indifferent. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) (*) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Figure 5. Combination treatment challenge against A. xylosoxidans invasion in BEAS-2B + 20% ASMDM-1 cell model. Confluent BEAS-2B cells were washed and infected with OD600 0.1 ± 0.02 for one hour to allow for intracellular invasion. Following this, cells were washed thrice with 100 μg/mL gentamicin before addition of combinations in a final concentration of 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% DMEM medium for three hours. Cells were washed twice with 1 × PBS before being lysed and intracellular bacterial loads were enumerated using CFU/mL. (a) ATCC 27061 and (b) AX 4365. Correlation with planktonic synergy was determined previously and is denoted as (S) synergy and (I) indifferent. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) (*) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Biomedicines 10 02886 g005
Biomedicines 10 02886 g006 550
Figure 6. THP-1 cell invasion by A. xylosoxidans may be reduced with synergistic combinations of colistin. PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were washed and infected with diluted bacterial cultures for one hour to allow for intracellular invasion. Following this, cells were washed thrice with 100 μg/mL gentamicin before adding CT [6] in a final concentration of 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% RPMI medium for three hours. Cells were washed twice with 1 × PBS before being lysed and intracellular bacterial loads were enumerated using CFU/mL. Strains shown are (a) ATCC 27061 and (b) AX 4365. Correlation with planktonic synergy has been determined previously [6] and is denoted on relevant data as follows: (S), synergy, (A) additive, and (I) indifferent. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05 (*) or not significant (p > 0.05) (n) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Figure 6. THP-1 cell invasion by A. xylosoxidans may be reduced with synergistic combinations of colistin. PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were washed and infected with diluted bacterial cultures for one hour to allow for intracellular invasion. Following this, cells were washed thrice with 100 μg/mL gentamicin before adding CT [6] in a final concentration of 20% ASMDM-1 and 80% RPMI medium for three hours. Cells were washed twice with 1 × PBS before being lysed and intracellular bacterial loads were enumerated using CFU/mL. Strains shown are (a) ATCC 27061 and (b) AX 4365. Correlation with planktonic synergy has been determined previously [6] and is denoted on relevant data as follows: (S), synergy, (A) additive, and (I) indifferent. (*) indicates the results are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05 (*) or not significant (p > 0.05) (n) based on unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Welch’s correction). Experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3).
Biomedicines 10 02886 g006
Table
Table 1. Source and antibiotic profiles of A. xylosoxidans strains used in this study.
Table 1. Source and antibiotic profiles of A. xylosoxidans strains used in this study.
StrainSourceAntibiotic Profile
TZP110CAZ30MEM10CIP5SXT25
ATCC 27061 TMATCC (Manassas, Virginia) (Ear Discharge)SISRR
AX 4365 +CF SputumNANANANAR
+ Clinical isolate of A. xylosoxidans was collecetd and de-identified at the respiratory clinic, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, Australia, prior to use in this study. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed at the microbiology department, RPAH, using VITEK2 as per the manufacturer’s instructions, using CLSI breakpoints for “other non-enterobacterales” (1). For colistin no breakpoints were detected. Breakpoints for antibiotics are Piperacillin-Tazobactam (TZP100) = 110 μg/mL; Ceftazidime (CAZ30) = 30 µg/mL; Meropenem (MEM10) = 10 μg/mL; Ciprofloxacin (CIP5) = 5 μg/mL; Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (SXT25) = 1.25/23.75 μg/mL. S, I, and R represent breakpoints intermediate and resistance, respectively, whereas NA = not available.
Table
Table 2. Combination therapy (CT) used in study was derived from Aiyer et al. (2021) [6] and was based on a synergy fractional inhibitory concentration index checkerboard assessment.
Table 2. Combination therapy (CT) used in study was derived from Aiyer et al. (2021) [6] and was based on a synergy fractional inhibitory concentration index checkerboard assessment.
Letter ReferenceNeutral NAC (mg/mL)Antibiotic (μg/mL)
A232 μg/mL Ciprofloxacin
B4.1
C8.2
D164 μg/mL Ciprofloxacin
E28 μg/mL Colistin
F4.1
G8.2
H216 μg/mL Colistin
I4.1
J8.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aiyer, A.; Das, T.; Whiteley, G.S.; Glasbey, T.; Kriel, F.H.; Farrell, J.; Manos, J. The Efficacy of an N-Acetylcysteine–Antibiotic Combination Therapy on Achromobacter xylosoxidans in a Cystic Fibrosis Sputum/Lung Cell Model. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112886

AMA Style

Aiyer A, Das T, Whiteley GS, Glasbey T, Kriel FH, Farrell J, Manos J. The Efficacy of an N-Acetylcysteine–Antibiotic Combination Therapy on Achromobacter xylosoxidans in a Cystic Fibrosis Sputum/Lung Cell Model. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11):2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aiyer, Aditi, Theerthankar Das, Gregory S. Whiteley, Trevor Glasbey, Frederik H. Kriel, Jessica Farrell, and Jim Manos. 2022. "The Efficacy of an N-Acetylcysteine–Antibiotic Combination Therapy on Achromobacter xylosoxidans in a Cystic Fibrosis Sputum/Lung Cell Model" Biomedicines 10, no. 11: 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop