Next Article in Journal
The Role of Dental Occlusion and Neuromuscular Behavior in Professional Ballet Dancers’ Performance: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Accuracy of Oral Cancer and Suspicious Malignant Mucosal Changes among Future Dentists
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review
Open AccessArticle

Efficacy of Arabic Coffee and Black Tea in Reducing Halitosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial

1
Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
2
Dental Intern, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Saturnino Marco Lupi
Healthcare 2021, 9(3), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030250
Received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 18 February 2021 / Published: 1 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Solutions for Oral Healthcare)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to objectively evaluate the short-term effect of Arabic coffee and black tea on oral halitosis. This study was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial on 17 healthy individuals. During the initial visit, pre-treatment breath samples were collected from each subject and analyzed using portable gas chromatography (OralChroma™). Four interventions were evaluated, with Arabic coffee and black tea as the test intervention tools, mouthwash containing a solution (0.05% chlorhexidine, 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride, and 0.14% zinc lactate (CHX-CPC-Zn)) as a positive control, and drinking water as a negative control. Halitosis was induced by rinsing with 10 mL solution of L-cysteine for 30 s. Twenty minutes later, a breath sample was taken to record the baseline volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) levels (T0). Then, the participants were asked to rinse with 10 mL of a randomly-assigned solution for 30 s. Sixty minutes later, another breath sample was recorded (T1). Finally, after 120 min, the final breath sample was recorded (T2). It was found that rinsing with Arabic coffee decreased the level of H2S both in the first hour (T1) and the second hour (T2). The reduction was significantly greater at T1 (p = 0.017). There was a similar result after the volunteers rinsed with black tea. At T2, Arabic coffee showed a substantially greater reduction in H2S (p < 0.001). On the contrary, using CHX-CPC-Zn showed a significant and continuous decrease in H2S values in the breath throughout the experiment (p < 0.001). Water showed no significant impact on the level of VSC (p = 0.71). This study demonstrates that black tea and Arabic coffee had inhibitory effects on halitosis that was greater in the first hour and was not sustained over a long period. Additionally, Arabic coffee had a greater inhibitory effect on halitosis than black tea.
Keywords: Arabic coffee; black tea; Camellia sinensis; cysteine challenge; oral malodor; cardamom Arabic coffee; black tea; Camellia sinensis; cysteine challenge; oral malodor; cardamom

1. Introduction

Halitosis is a term of Latin origin derived from halitus (breathed air) and osis (pathologic alteration). According to the Glossary of Periodontal Terms (2001), halitosis is defined as “breath that is offensive to others, caused by a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, periodontal disease, bacterial coating of the tongue, systemic disorders, and different types of food” [1]. Various factors cause oral malodor, including those originating from the oral cavity, such as tongue coating, periodontal disease, peri-implant disease, deep carious lesions, exposed necrotic tooth pulps, pericoronitis, imperfect dental restorations, and food impaction [2,3,4]. On the contrary, non-oral halitosis results from upper or lower respiratory tract diseases, gastrointestinal tract disorders, metabolic disorders, some systemic diseases, and carcinomas [5].
Several odoriferous components lead to oral malodor. Volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH, MM), and dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3) were found to have a notable connection with oral malodor [6]. The bacteria produce odorous volatile sulfur compounds in the oral cavity [7].
The first line of therapy to treat halitosis should be to eliminate the identified causal factors. Reduced plaque accumulation could be achieved by mechanical and chemical methods or a combination of both [8]. Several types of mouthwash reportedly treat halitosis effectively with specific active ingredients, such as: chlorhexidine gluconate [9], essential oils [10], and triclosan [11]. Some reports suggest that mouthwashes consisting of chlorhexidine gluconate and a combination of cetylpyridinum chloride with zinc yield better outcomes in treating oral malodor [12,13]. Additionally, patients suffering from halitosis have used some natural herbal products that might provide a masking effect against bad breath odor. A survey carried out on 481 dental students found that around 44% of males and 37% of females reported drinking black tea to mask halitosis [14].
Coffee, a commonly brewed beverage worldwide [15], comes from beans of the genus Coffea. Coffee contains caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and trigonelline, which have both antibacterial and antioxidant effects. Coffee extracts reportedly have antimicrobial activity in addition to the ability to inhibit the protease production of Porphyromonas gingivalis [16]. Furthermore, coffee extract reportedly significantly minimized the concentration of VSC by 85%, as well as VSC-producing bacteria in vitro [17].
Tea is made from plant leaves of Camellia sinensis, which is considered the second most consumed beverage globally [15]. Of the total tea consumption, 20% is green tea, while 78% is black tea [18]. The fermentation of green tea leaves achieves black tea production; this fermentation process reportedly reduces some of the tea’s beneficial chemical components [19,20,21]. Tea contains several polyphenolic compounds, such as flavonols and catechins. These compounds have demonstrated a wide variety of antioxidant and antibacterial activities [20,22]. Zeng et al. showed reduced levels of hydrogen sulfide and MM after using green tea extract [23]. Other in vitro studies reported the antimicrobial effect of green tea extract. In vivo observations by Lodhia et al. found a significant reduction in VSC immediately due to green tea usage [24]. Up to this date, there is little evidence of the short-term effect of using Arabic coffee and black tea on the VSC of subjects suffering from halitosis.
This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effect of Arabic coffee and black tea on halitosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This study was a single-center, crossover, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University. The institutional review board of the King Saud University approved this study (No. 17/0316), and reported following the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Figure 1).
All participants provided informed consent; 29 were initially screened for the following inclusion criteria:
  • Healthy male participants;
  • Age 18 years or older;
  • Absence of halitosis in exhaled air.
The participants were excluded from this study if they had any of the following conditions:
  • Respiratory tract diseases;
  • Tonsillitis;
  • Stomach disorders;
  • Antibiotic use in the previous three months;
  • Being a smoker;
  • Presence of fewer than 20 natural teeth.
The presence of halitosis was defined as the ability to detect volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) in the breath sample equal to or greater than the cognitive threshold [Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) ≥ 112 ppb or Methyl Mercaptan (CH3SH, MM) ≥ 26 ppb [25].

2.2. Study Protocol

The study enrolled 17 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and consented to participate voluntarily. At the initial visit, a pre-treatment breath sample was collected from each subject. Additionally, the probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) [26], and gingival index (GI) [27] were recorded.
All clinical measurements were performed by two examiners (AZ and KW). Calibration exercises for clinical measurements were performed in 10 patients not included in the study. The intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability yielded kappa values of 0.9 and 0.88, respectively. At the end of the initial visit, each subject received an oral hygiene kit containing a dentifrice and a soft toothbrush, and they were instructed to use it throughout the study.
There were four interventions in this study: Arabic coffee and black tea used as test solutions, as well as mouthwash containing CHX-CPC-Zn (Halita®, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain) as a positive control, and drinking water as a negative control.
Arabic coffee and black tea were standardized and freshly prepared daily. Black tea solution was prepared by adding 12 g of black tea (AlMunayes General Trading Est., Sharq, Kuwait) to a liter of boiled water. The tea was brewed for ten minutes.
The Arabic coffee solution prepared using 30 g of ground coffee (Jiad Al-Qassim, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia) was added to 800 mL of water and boiled for 15 min. Then 10 g of cardamom were added, and the solution was boiled for an additional 2 min, after which it was allowed to brew for 10 min. Later, the coffee solution was filtered to remove the coffee grounds. All solutions used in the four interventions were served in identical paper cups, covered with lids, and encoded as A, B, C, and D by another investigator (WA). To ensure the blindness of the study, neither participants nor examiners were aware of the codification. The subjects were randomly allocated to each intervention using a computer-generated randomization schedule.

2.3. Experimental Phase

At the beginning of each intervention, halitosis was induced by rinsing with 10 mL of 6 mM aqueous solution of L-cysteine solution for 30 s, according to the Kleinberg protocol [28]. Twenty minutes later, a breath sample was taken to record the increased VSC levels at baseline before the intervention (T0). After the baseline reading, the participant was asked to rinse with 10 mL of a randomly-allocated mouthwash for 30 s. Sixty minutes later, another breath sample was taken and recorded (T1). Finally, after 120 min, the final breath sample was taken (T2). The subjects were asked to refrain from eating, drinking, brushing, or using chewing gum throughout the experimental phase. The same procedure was repeated for the next intervention after one-week washout period (Figure 1).

2.4. VSC Assessment

VSC was detected using a portable Semiconductor Gas Sensor OralChromaTM CHM-2 (Abilit, Osaka, Japan). Participants were requested to close their mouths and breathe with their noses for 60 s before the breath samples were collected. Then, using a disposable plastic syringe, a 1-mL breath sample was collected. Immediately, the collected breath sample was injected into the OralChroma device. The concentration of H2S and MM were recorded in ppb.

2.5. Statistical Tests

2.5.1. Study Power

The sample size was determined using the Cohen (1988) procedure, by assuming an effect size (f) of 0.80 and with study power of 90% (1 − β = 0.90) and at α = 0.05. The study required at least 10 subjects to establish a statistically significant difference between the four study intervention groups. Since this was a crossover trial, more subjects were enrolled to guard against the possibility of withdrawal from follow-up.

2.5.2. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS Pc+ version 21.0 statistical software. The descriptive statistics (mean and the standard deviation) were used to present the average value obtained for H2S and MM for each given intervention and time. A line graph was also used to present averages’ movement due to each intervention’s change in time. Furthermore, the difference in H2S and MM’s mean values due to variations in interventions at a given time (T0, T1, T2) was analyzed using the one-way ANOVA. Similarly, the effect of variation in time within each intervention was also studied for each gas through the one-way ANOVA. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Out of the 17 subjects, six withdrew from the study due to personal circumstances. Therefore, the data of 11 study subjects were analyzed. The age range was 20–24 years, with a mean age of 22 years (Table 1).

3.1. Impact of Arabic Coffee on Halitosis

The comparison of total VSC values between pre- and post-intervention using Arabic coffee showed statistically significant changes in the H2S values (p < 0.001), but there were no significant changes in those of MM (p = 0.005). At baseline, the means of H2S and MM were 446 ppb and 73 ppb, respectively. Two hours after treatment, they dropped to 230 ppb and 66 ppb, respectively.

3.2. Impact of Black Tea on Halitosis

Black tea demonstrated a significant impact on the VSC level. The baseline mean of H2S was 457 ppb. After treatment, it decreased to 307 ppb (p = 0.045). Meanwhile, the mean of MM at baseline was 101 ppb, which significantly reduced at 2 h to 79 ppb (p = 0.03) (Table 2).

3.3. Impact of CHX-CPC-Zn Mouthwash on Halitosis

At baseline, the mean level of H2S was 450 ppb. H2S concentration decreased to 74 ppb after 2 h of treatment with CHX-CPC-Zn (p < 0.001). Additionally, MM concentration decreased from 106 ppb to 36 ppb at 2 h after treatment (p = 0.005) Table 2.

3.4. Impact of Water on Halitosis

Water had the least impact on the VSC concentrations among all four interventions. At baseline, the means of H2S and MM were 412 ppb and 73 ppb, respectively. H2S reduced to 244 ppb, one hour after treatment, then increased, although not significantly, to 384 ppb (p = 0.71). Similarly, there was no significant change in MM (p = 0.3) Table 2.

3.5. Mouthwashes Intergroup Analysis

At baseline and the first hour, there was no significant difference in the means of H2S and MM in the pre-treatment breath samples of all four interventions (Figure 2 and Figure 3). On the contrary, there was a statistically significant difference in the means of H2S and MM at 2 h post-treatment among all four interventions (p = 0.000 and p = 0.034, respectively) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

All over the world, coffee and tea are the most consumed beverages after water [29]. Customarily, coffee and tea are used, especially in the morning, to reduce oral halitosis [14]. The present study aimed to assess the short-term effect of coffee and black tea on halitosis.
This study used a crossover trial technique, where each individual acts as his/her own control. The crossover study design decreased the chance of inter-individual variations that may influence the study outcome. On the contrary, the parallel design has a much greater inter-subject variation. Furthermore, a crossover study design is inherently more powerful than a parallel design for the same number of subjects recruited. An appropriate washout period is required for any crossover study to avoid any treatment intervention’s carry-over effects. The appropriate washout period for products would depend on their efficacy and/or their mode of action. For regular oral care products, a one-week washout period is considered an appropriate timescale to ensure no carry-over effects [30].
Several clinical trials have been conducted using either short- or long-term models to evaluate mouthwashes’ efficacy in reducing oral malodor. The long-term model is used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of using a particular mouthwash for a long period (2–3 weeks). On the other hand, the short-term model is used to assess the mouthwash’s immediate effect (masking) over 1–5 h. The cysteine challenge model was adopted in this study to evaluate the effect of various mouthwashes on halitosis [28]. Rinsing with cysteine (10 mL of 6 mM for 30 s) will raise the VSC production by the bacteria on the tongue and teeth, which will result in oral malodor. Cysteine breakdown occurs by oral bacteria into VSC, which can be assessed as a quantitative parameter using chromatography devices such as OralChroma [28].
The current study revealed an initial decrease in the VSC level during the first hour in both black tea and coffee groups. The decrease was followed by an increase in VSC concentration during the second hour, which indicates that coffee and black tea have no long-term effect on VSC reduction after 2 h. The current study results showed a statistically significant reduction in the VSC levels 2 h after using coffee. Gov et al. demonstrated in an in vitro study that coffee components significantly reduced VSC levels and VSC-producing bacteria [17]. It has been reported in several studies that coffee extracts contain substances that have both antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [16,31,32,33]. Roasted coffee’s antibacterial activity was attributable to the presence of compounds like caffeine, α-dicarbonyl, glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and diacetyl [34]. More specifically, in vitro studies have demonstrated that coffee extract has antibacterial effects against P. gingivalis, and Prevotella intermedia, which are the bacteria closely associated with halitosis [16,35,36]. Furthermore, the coffee extract can inhibit protease production by P. gingivalis [16]. Cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), which is a traditional aromatic plant, is one of the major ingredients of Arabic coffee. It has been reported that cardamom has some antibacterial activities [37,38]. More specifically, Souiss et al. reported that cardamom inhibits the growth of periodontal pathogens such as: P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; those bacteria are highly associated with production of halitosis [38]. In a clinical trial, Erawati et al. stated that rinsing with a mouthwash containing 0.5% cardamom essential oil had reduced the levels of VSC in breath for up 5 h after rinsing [39].
The effect of green tea extract mouthwash on VSC was studied by Farina et al.; they observed that green tea had an immediate inhibitory effect on the production of VSC, with no residual inhibitory effects at 90 and 180 min. This is in agreement with the present study [40]. The black tea used in this study has a different composition from green tea due to the fermentation process, which degrades the phenolic compounds responsible for antibacterial and antioxidant activities [20,21]. Furthermore, the concentration of zinc in black tea is less than that in green tea [19]. The presence of zinc plays an important role in masking halitosis by binding to volatile H2S and MM, which will convert them into Zn-sulfides (non-volatile), reducing the expression of the VSCs in the breath [41].
In this study, the data demonstrated the positive impact of using CHX-CPC-Zn mouthwash on reducing the VSC. This study’s results are in agreement with those of previous studies, which showed the beneficial impact of using CHX-CPC-Zn mouthwash [13,42,43,44]. In a systematic review, Blom et al. concluded that CHX-CPC-Zn mouthwash provided the best evidence in the bifacial effect concerning halitosis [12].
Female subjects were not included in this trial due to fluctuations in sex hormone levels during the menstrual cycle, which will affect the levels of volatile sulfur compounds and thus affecting the outcome of the clinical trial [45,46].
One of the study’s limitations is the difficulty of blinding well-known drinks such as tea and coffee. The examiners were completely blinded; however, the participants could identify the type of drink they were taking. Future studies with larger sample size should be conducted.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that tea and Arabic coffee had inhibitory effects on halitosis. The greater reduction in halitosis occurred in the first hour and was not sustained over a long period of time. Additionally, Arabic coffee had a greater inhibitory effect on halitosis than black tea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A., A.A., and K.A.; data curation, H.A., A.A., K.A., and W.A.; formal analysis, H.A. and K.A.; funding acquisition, H.A.; investigation, H.A., A.A., K.A., and W.A.; methodology, H.A., A.A., K.A., and W.A.; project administration, H.A.; resources, H.A.; supervision, H.A.; validation, H.A.; visualization, H.A. and M.A.; writing—original draft, H.A., A.A., K.A., and W.A.; writing—review and editing, H.A. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors express their sincere appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2020/255), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This clinical trial was approved by institutional review board (IRB) of the King Saud University (No. 17/0316). The ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards were followed.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of Periodontal Terms; American Academy of Periodontology: Chicago, IL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Scully, C.; Greenman, J. Halitosis (breath odor). Periodontology 2000 2008, 48, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scully, C.; Greenman, J. Halitology (breath odour: Aetiopathogenesis and management). Oral Dis. 2012, 18, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alzoman, H. The association between periodontal diseases and halitosis among Saudi patients. Saudi Dent. J. 2021, 33, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yaegaki, K.; Coil, J.M. Examination, classification, and treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J. Canadian Dent. Assoc. 2000, 66, 257–261. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yaegaki, K.; Brunette, D.M.; Tangerman, A.; Choe, Y.-S.; Winkel, E.G.; Ito, S.; Kitano, T.; Ii, H.; Calenic, B.; Ishkitiev, N.; et al. Standardization of clinical protocols in oral malodor research. J. Breath Res. 2012, 6, 017101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Oshiro, A.; Zaitsu, T.; Ueno, M.; Kawaguchi, Y. Characterization of oral bacteria in the tongue coating of patients with halitosis using 16S rRNA analysis. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2020, 78, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Slot, D.E.; De Geest, S.; Van Der Weijden, F.A.; Quirynen, M. Treatment of oral malodour. Medium-term efficacy of mechanical and/or chemical agents: A systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2015, 42, S303–S316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sood, P.; Devi, A.M.; Narang, R.; Swathi, V.; Makkar, D.K. Comparative Efficacy of Oil Pulling and Chlorhexidine on Oral Malodor: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, ZC18–ZC21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carvalho, M.D.; Tabchoury, C.; Cury, J.A.; Toledo, S.; Nogueira-Filho, G.R. Impact of mouthrinses on morning bad breath in healthy subjects. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2004, 31, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Young, A.; Jonski, G.; Rölla, G. A study of triclosan and its solubilizers as inhibitors of oral malodour. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2002, 29, 1078–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blom, T.; Slot, D.; Quirynen, M.; Van Der Weijden, G. The effect of mouthrinses on oral malodor: A systematic review. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2012, 10, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alsaffar, D.; Alzoman, H. Efficacy of antioxidant mouthwash in the reduction of halitosis: A randomized, double blind, controlled crossover clinical trial. J. Dent. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Almas, K.; Al-Hawish, A.; Al-Khamis, W. Oral Hygiene Practices, Smoking Habits, and Self-Perceived Oral Malodor among Dental Students. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2003, 4, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Özen, A.E.; Bibiloni, M.D.M.; Pons, A.; Tur, J.A. Fluid intake from beverages across age groups: A systematic review. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 28, 417–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tsou, S.-H.; Hu, S.-W.; Yang, J.-J.; Yan, M.; Lin, Y.-Y. Potential Oral Health Care Agent from Coffee against Virulence Factor of Periodontitis. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gov, Y.; Sterer, N.; Rosenberg, M. In vitro effect of coffee on oral malodor-related parameters. J. Breath Res. 2010, 4, 026004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siddiqui, I.A.; Afaq, F.; Adhami, V.M.; Ahmad, N.; Mukhtar, H. Antioxidants of the Beverage Tea in Promotion of Human Health. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2004, 6, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pohl, P.; Szymczycha-Madeja, A.; Welna, M. Direct ICP-OES multielement analysis of infused black and green teas and chemical fractionation of selected essential and non-essential elements prior to evaluation of their bioavailability and classification of teas by pattern recognition. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 1955–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chan, E.W.; Tie, P.P.; Soh, E.Y.; Law, Y.P. Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of green, black, and herbal teas of Camellia sinensis. Pharmacogn. Res. 2011, 3, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.; Bruins, M.E.; Ni, L.; Vincken, J.-P. Green and Black Tea Phenolics: Bioavailability, Transformation by Colonic Microbiota, and Modulation of Colonic Microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8469–8477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anita, P.; Sivasamy, S.; Kumar, P.D.M.; Balan, I.N.; Ethiraj, S. In vitro antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis extract against cariogenic microorganisms. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2015, 6, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zeng, Q.C.; Wu, A.Z.; Pika, J. The effect of green tea extract on the removal of sulfur-containing oral malodor volatiles in vitro and its potential application in chewing gum. J. Breath Res. 2010, 4, 036005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lodhia, P.; Yaegaki, K.; Khakbaznejad, A.; Imai, T.; Sato, T.; Tanaka, T.; Murata, T.; Kamoda, T. Effect of Green Tea on Volatile Sulfur Compounds in Mouth Air. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2008, 54, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aizawa, F.; Kishi, M.; Moriya, T.; Takahashi, M.; Inaba, D.; Yonemitsu, M. The analysis of characteristics of elderly people with high VSC level. Oral Dis. 2005, 11, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Silness, J.; Löe, H. Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condition. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1964, 22, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Löe, H.; Silness, J. Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy I. Prevalence and Severity. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1963, 21, 533–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kleinberg, I.; Codipilly, D. Cysteine challenge testing: A powerful tool for examining oral malodour processes and treatments in vivo. Int. Dent. J. 2002, 52, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Reyes, C.M.; Cornelis, M.C. Caffeine in the Diet: Country-Level Consumption and Guidelines. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mendes, L.; Coimbra, J.; Pereira, A.L.; Resende, M.; Pinto, M.G. Comparative effect of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, triclosan and zinc on volatile sulphur compounds: A randomized, crossover, double-blind study. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2016, 14, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duangjai, A.; Suphrom, N.; Wungrath, J.; Ontawong, A.; Nuengchamnong, N.; Yosboonruang, A. Comparison of antioxidant, antimicrobial activities and chemical profiles of three coffee (Coffea arabica L.) pulp aqueous extracts. Integr. Med. Res. 2016, 5, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tomac, I.; Šeruga, M.; Labuda, J. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of chlorogenic acids and coffee extracts by an electrochemical DNA-based biosensor. Food Chem. 2020, 325, 126787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tasew, T.; Mekonnen, Y.; Gelana, T.; Redi-Abshiro, M.; Chandravanshi, B.S.; Ele, E.; Mohammed, A.M.; Mamo, H. In Vitro Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Roasted and Green Coffee Beans Originating from Different Regions of Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Daglia, M.; Papetti, A.; Grisoli, P.; Aceti, C.; Spini, V.; Dacarro, C.; Gazzani, G. Isolation, Identification, and Quantification of Roasted Coffee Antibacterial Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10208–10213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mehta, V.V.; Rajesh, G.; Rao, A.; Shenoy, R.; Mithun Pai, B.H. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Punica granatum mesocarp, Nelumbo nucifera Leaf, Psidium guajava Leaf and Coffea Canephora Extract on Common Oral Pathogens: An In-vitro Study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2014, 8, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bharath, N.; Sowmya, N.K.; Mehta, D.S. Determination of antibacterial activity of green coffee bean extract on periodontogenic bacteria like Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: An in vitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2015, 6, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghazi, A.M.; Na’Ma, A.J.; Kshash, Q.H.; Jasim, N.S. Study of the Antibacterial Activity of Elettaria Cardamomum Extracts on the Growth of Some Gingivitis Inducing Bacteria in Culture Media. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2020, 10, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Souissi, M.; Azelmat, J.; Chaieb, K.; Grenier, D. Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) extracts: Potential therapeutic benefits for periodontal infections. Anaerobe 2020, 61, 102089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Erawati, S.; Rahardjo, A.; Pintauli, S. Clinical Efficacy of a New Mouthwash Containing Essential Oil of Cardamom in Reducing Volatile Sulphur Coumpounds Concentration. Int. J. Clin. Prev. Dent. 2014, 10, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farina, V.H.; De Lima, A.P.; Balducci, I.; Brandão, A.A.H. Effects of the medicinal plants Curcuma zedoaria and Camellia sinensis on halitosis control. Braz. Oral Res. 2012, 26, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Young, A.; Jonski, G.; Rölla, G. The oral anti-volatile sulphur compound effects of zinc salts and their stability constants. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2002, 110, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Van Steenberghe, D.; Avontroodt, P.; Peeters, W.; Pauwels, M.; Coucke, W.; Lijnen, A.; Quirynen, M. Effect of Different Mouthrinses on Morning Breath. J. Periodontol. 2001, 72, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Roldán, S.; Winkel, E.G.; Herrera, D.; Sanz, M.; Van Winkelhoff, A.J. The effects of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride and zinc lactate on the microflora of oral halitosis patients: A dual-centre, double-blind placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2003, 30, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dadamio, J.; Laleman, I.; De Geest, S.; Vancauwenberghe, F.; DeKeyser, C.; Coucke, W.; Quirynen, M. Usefulness of a new malodour-compound detection portable device in oral malodour diagnosis. J. Breath Res. 2013, 7, 46005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kakoei, S.; Barkhori, F.; Mirzazadeh, A.; Mohammadi, M.; Gholamhoseinian, A. Influence of menstrual cycle and salivary ß-estradiol on volatile sulfur compound. J. Oral Health Oral Epidemiol. 2012, 1, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  46. Calil, C.; Lima, P.; Bernardes, C.; Groppo, F.; Bado, F.; Marcondes, F. Influence of gender and menstrual cycle on volatile sulphur compounds production. Arch. Oral Biol. 2008, 53, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Consort flowchart of the study inclusion, allocation, and follow-up.
Figure 1. Consort flowchart of the study inclusion, allocation, and follow-up.
Healthcare 09 00250 g001
Figure 2. Variation in averages of H2S for all interventions at three time intervals.
Figure 2. Variation in averages of H2S for all interventions at three time intervals.
Healthcare 09 00250 g002
Figure 3. Variation in averages of methyl mercaptan for all interventions at three time intervals.
Figure 3. Variation in averages of methyl mercaptan for all interventions at three time intervals.
Healthcare 09 00250 g003
Table 1. Subjects’ characteristics.
Table 1. Subjects’ characteristics.
VariablesMean ± SD
Age22.2(±4.1)
PI1.05 (±0.77)
GI1.26 (±0.74)
PD2.1 (±0.92)
Table 2. Comparison of averages at three different times for each intervention.
Table 2. Comparison of averages at three different times for each intervention.
InterventionMean (SD)p-Value
ToT1T2
H2S
WATER412.18 (148.53)244.54 (95.28)384.36 (161.89)0.710
CHX-CPC-ZN450.54 (291.35)163.72 (178.95)74.27 (72.21)0.000 *
COFFEE446.82 (169.65)167.82 (88.41)230.54 (128.82)0.000 *
TEA457.27 (334.58)195.54 (154.27)307.27 (252.08)0.045 *
Methyl mercaptan
WATER73.18 (44.61)54.82 (20.65)77.72 (38.96)0.306
CHX-CPC-ZN106.36 (63.73)55.63 (38.87)36.0 (36.05)0.005 *
COFFEE73.0 (58.88)45.36 (52.87)66.36 (44.77)0.445
TEA101.27 (67.35)48.82 (26.35)79.09 (27.03)0.033 *
* Statistically significant at the 0.05 significance threshold.
Table 3. Comparison of averages from four different interventions at given time.
Table 3. Comparison of averages from four different interventions at given time.
TimeMean (SD)p-Value
WATERCHX-CPC-ZNCOFFEETEA
H2S
BASELINE412.18 (148.53)450.54 (291.35)446.82 (169.65)457.27 (334.58)0.975
T1244.54 (95.28)163.72 (178.95)167.82 (88.41)195.54 (154.27)0.481
T2384.36 (161.89)74.27 (72.21)230.54 (128.82)307.27(252.08)0.000 *
Methyl mercaptan
T073.18 (44.61)106.36 (63.73)73.0 (58.88)101.27 (67.35)0.403
T154.82 (20.65)55.63 (38.87)45.36 (52.87)48.82 (26.35)0.899
T277.72 (38.96)36.0 (36.05)66.36 (44.77)79.09 (27.03)0.034 *
* Statistically significant at the 0.05 significance threshold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to TopTop