Next Article in Journal
Can Empathy Help Individuals and Society? Through the Lens of Volunteering and Mental Health
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia and Achalasia-Related Diseases in Patients Aged 75 Years and Over
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Social Media Use on Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Impairment: An Empirical Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission

1
Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
2
Integrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Science, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2021, 9(11), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405
Submission received: 18 September 2021 / Revised: 16 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021

Abstract

The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES parameters used for the endoscopic evaluation of UC in histological remission. First, 42 endoscopists of four observer groups examined each MES parameter, which were evaluated from endoscopically obtained images of 100 cases as Grade 0 or 1 of the Nancy histological index of histopathological inflammation. Then, IOR was assessed using multiple κ statistics for each finding of MES. The results showed that IOR among all the observers was slight or fair for all the parameters, indicating a low IOR. The experts of the UC practice group had “moderate” or higher IOR for seven of the nine parameters, whereas “slight” or “fair” results were found for all parameters by the trainee group. The IOR for each MES parameter was calculated separately for the observer groups. All the groups showed “slight” or “fair” for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. Large differences between the endoscopists were found in the IOR for the MES parameters in UC in histological remission. Even among UC practice experts, the IOR was low for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”.
Keywords: endoscopic remission; histological remission; interobserver reliability; Mayo endoscopic subscore; ulcerative colitis endoscopic remission; histological remission; interobserver reliability; Mayo endoscopic subscore; ulcerative colitis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanazawa, M.; Tominaga, K.; Yamamiya, A.; Tanaka, T.; Watanabe, S.; Sugaya, T.; Abe, K.; Kanamori, A.; Arisaka, T.; Hoshi, K.; et al. Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405

AMA Style

Kanazawa M, Tominaga K, Yamamiya A, Tanaka T, Watanabe S, Sugaya T, Abe K, Kanamori A, Arisaka T, Hoshi K, et al. Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission. Healthcare. 2021; 9(11):1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanazawa, Mimari, Keiichi Tominaga, Akira Yamamiya, Takanao Tanaka, Shoko Watanabe, Takeshi Sugaya, Keiichiro Abe, Akira Kanamori, Takahiro Arisaka, Koki Hoshi, and et al. 2021. "Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission" Healthcare 9, no. 11: 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405

APA Style

Kanazawa, M., Tominaga, K., Yamamiya, A., Tanaka, T., Watanabe, S., Sugaya, T., Abe, K., Kanamori, A., Arisaka, T., Hoshi, K., Iijima, M., Goda, K., Haruyama, Y., & Irisawa, A. (2021). Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission. Healthcare, 9(11), 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop