Reliability of the Linear Measurement (Contact) Method Compared with Stereophotogrammetry (Optical Scanning) for the Evaluation of Edema after Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bretschneider, T.; Koop, U.; Schreiner, V.; Wenck, H.; Jaspers, S. Validation of the body scanner as a measuring tool for a rapid quantification of body shape. Skin Res. Technol. 2009, 15, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brüllmann, D.; Jürchott, L.M.; John, C.; Trempler, C.; Schwanecke, U.; Schulze, R.K. A contact-free volumetric measurement of facial volume after third molar osteotomy: proof of concept. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2014, 117, e51–e56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwenzer-Zimmerer, K.; Boerner, B.I.; Schwenzer, N.F.; Müller, A.A.; Juergens, P.; Ringenbach, A.; Schkommodau, E.; Zeilhofer, H.F. Facial acquisition by dynamic optical tracked laser imaging: a new approach. J. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009, 62, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soncul, M.; Bamber, M.A. Evaluation of facial soft tissue changeswith optical surface scan after surgical correction of class III deformities. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004, 62, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, P.V.; Zhao, L.; Patel, P.K.; Bolognese, A.M. Three-dimensional facial surface analysis of patients with skeletal malocclusion. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2009, 20, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krimmel, M.; Schuck, N.; Bacher, M.; Reinert, S. Facial surface changes after cleft alveolar bone grafting. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011, 69, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Meer, W.J.; Dijkstra, P.; Visser, A.; Vissink, A. Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner. British J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014, 52, 922–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kau, C.H.; Cronin, A.J.; Richmond, S. A three-dimensional evaluation of post-operative following orthognathic surgery at months. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 2007, 119, 2192–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzou, C.; Frey, M. Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg. Clin. North Am. 2011, 19, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koudstaal, M.J.; Poort, L.J.; van der Wal, K.G.; Wolvius, E.B.; Prahl-Andersen, B.; Schulten, A.J. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME): A review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 3, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, A. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod. 1961, 31, 73–90. [Google Scholar]
- Woods, M.; Wiesenfeld, D.; Probert, T. Surgically-assisted maxillary expansion. Aust. Dent. J. 1997, 42, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amin, M.M.; Laskin, D.M. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 1983, 55, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, M.; Gellrich, N.; Joos, U.; Piffko, J. 3D evaluation of post-operative swelling using two different cooling methods following orthognathic surgery: A randomised observer blind prospective pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011, 40, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nickenig, H.; Wichmann, M.; Zöller, J.; Eitner, S. 3-D based minimally invasive one-stage lateral sinus elevation: A prospective randomized clinical pilot study with blinded assessment of post-operative visible facial soft tissue volume change. J. Cranio. Maxillofac Surg. 2014, 42, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tozzi, U.; Santillo, V.; Tartaro, P.; Sellitto, A.; Gravino, G.; Santagata, A. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Anti-edema Drugs for Edema Control in Orthognathic Surgery Using Digitizer 3-D to Measure Facial Swelling. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015, 14, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asutay, F.; Ozcan-Kucuk, A.; Alan, H.; Koparal, M. Three-dimensional evaluation of the effect of low-level laser therapy on facial swelling after lower third molar surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2018, 21, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koparal, M.; Ozcan Kucuk, A.; Alan, H.; Asutay, F.; Avcı, M. Effects of low-level laser therapy following surgical extraction of the lower third molar with objective measurement of swelling using a three-dimensional system. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 15, 3820–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mocan, A.; Kisnisci, R.; Uçok, C. Stereophotogrammetric and clinical evaluation of morbidity after removal of lower third molarsby two different surgical techniques. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996, 2, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulu, M.; Gözlüklü, Ö.; Kaya, Ç.; Ünal, N.; Akçay, H. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Effects of Kinesio Taping on Post-operative Swelling and Pain after Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion. J. Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018, 9, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yip, E.; Smith, A.; Yoshino, M. Volumetric evaluation of facial swelling utilizing a 3-D range camera. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004, 33, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Side | Day 1 (cm) | Day 2 (cm) | Day 5 (cm) | Mean (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Right | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.72 ± 0.03 | 0.59 ± 0.023 | 0.65 ± 0.02 |
Left | 0.63 ± 0.028 | 0.71 ± 0.032 | 0.59 ± 0.026 | 0.64 ± 0.02 |
Both | 1.26 ± 0.02 | 1.42 ± 0.03 | 1.42 ± 0.03 |
Side | Day 1 (dL) | Day 2 (dL) | Day 5 (dL) | Mean (dL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Right | 12.634 ± 0.618 | 15.027 ± 0.922 | 10.994 ± 0.648 | 12.885 ± 0.616 |
Left | 12.183 ± 0.839 | 15.027 ± 0.922 | 10.859 ± 0.779 | 12.469 ± 0.801 |
Both | 24.818 ± 0.684 | 29.392 ± 0.926 | 21.852 ± 0.7 |
Face Volumetric | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
General Face Guide Points | 1 | 0.99 | ||
2 | 0.99 | |||
3 | 0.98 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Koçer, G.; Sönmez, S.; Findik, Y.; Yazici, T. Reliability of the Linear Measurement (Contact) Method Compared with Stereophotogrammetry (Optical Scanning) for the Evaluation of Edema after Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion. Healthcare 2020, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010052
Koçer G, Sönmez S, Findik Y, Yazici T. Reliability of the Linear Measurement (Contact) Method Compared with Stereophotogrammetry (Optical Scanning) for the Evaluation of Edema after Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion. Healthcare. 2020; 8(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010052
Chicago/Turabian StyleKoçer, Gülperi, Samed Sönmez, Yavuz Findik, and Tayfun Yazici. 2020. "Reliability of the Linear Measurement (Contact) Method Compared with Stereophotogrammetry (Optical Scanning) for the Evaluation of Edema after Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion" Healthcare 8, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010052
APA StyleKoçer, G., Sönmez, S., Findik, Y., & Yazici, T. (2020). Reliability of the Linear Measurement (Contact) Method Compared with Stereophotogrammetry (Optical Scanning) for the Evaluation of Edema after Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion. Healthcare, 8(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010052