Next Article in Journal
Clinical Implementation of an Adapted Infection Risk Screening Tool Following Nurse-Led Haemodialysis Vascular Access Consultation
Previous Article in Journal
Chronic Disease Monitoring: Methodology for Classification Error and Self-Selection Bias Correction in Clinical Laboratory Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Ethical Decision-Making Guidelines for Mental Health Clinicians in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era

Department of Counseling and Higher Education, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
Healthcare 2025, 13(23), 3057; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233057
Submission received: 9 September 2025 / Revised: 19 November 2025 / Accepted: 20 November 2025 / Published: 25 November 2025

Abstract

The meteoric rise in generative AI has created both opportunities and ethical challenges for the mental health disciplines, namely in clinical mental health counseling, psychology, psychiatry, and social work. While these disciplines have been grounded in well-established ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, justice, fidelity, and confidentiality, the exponential ubiquity of AI in society has rendered mental health professionals unsure as to how to navigate ethical decision making in the AI era. The author proposes a preliminary ethical framework which synthesizes the code of ethics of the American Counseling Association (ACA), the American Psychological Association (APA), the American Medical Association (AMA), and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), which is then organized around five pillars: (i) autonomy and informed consent; (ii) beneficence and non-malfeasance; (iii) confidentiality, privacy, and transparency; (iv) justice, fairness and inclusiveness; and (v) fidelity, professional integrity, and accountability. These pillars are juxtaposed with AI ethical guidelines developed by multinational organizations, governmental and non-governmental entities, and technology corporations. The resulting integrated ethical framework provides a practical cogent structure that mental health professionals can use when navigating this uncharted terrain. A case study based on the proposed ethical framework and strategies that clinical mental professionals can consider prior to incorporating AI into their clinical repertoire are offered. Limitations of the framework and its implications for future research are addressed.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; ethics; mental health artificial intelligence; ethics; mental health

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pillay, Y. Ethical Decision-Making Guidelines for Mental Health Clinicians in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era. Healthcare 2025, 13, 3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233057

AMA Style

Pillay Y. Ethical Decision-Making Guidelines for Mental Health Clinicians in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era. Healthcare. 2025; 13(23):3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pillay, Yegan. 2025. "Ethical Decision-Making Guidelines for Mental Health Clinicians in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era" Healthcare 13, no. 23: 3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233057

APA Style

Pillay, Y. (2025). Ethical Decision-Making Guidelines for Mental Health Clinicians in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era. Healthcare, 13(23), 3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop