This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
Open Notes in Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Stakeholder Experiences and Implications for Clinical Practice
by
Michela Monaci
Michela Monaci 1
,
Setareh Javaher
Setareh Javaher 1
and
Serena Barello
Serena Barello 1,2,*
1
WHYpsy Lab, Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Unit of Applied Psychology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(21), 2777; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212777 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 September 2025
/
Revised: 21 October 2025
/
Accepted: 28 October 2025
/
Published: 31 October 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Open Notes—defined as patients’ electronic, portal-based access to clinicians’ narrative documentation within electronic health records (EHRs)—has become routine through policy and portal initiatives. In mental health (MH), transparency intersects with sensitive formulation and risk language, making outcomes contingent on documentation practices, release timing, and reader support. This scoping review mapped empirical evidence on experiences, perceived impacts, and implementation of Open Notes in MH across stakeholders and settings, deriving implications for practice, training, and policy. Methods: A PRISMA-ScR-guided review was conducted with a preregistered protocol on OSF. Eligible studies examined Open Notes in MH settings and reported stakeholder perspectives. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, analyzed through inductive narrative thematic synthesis. Results: Twenty-two studies (2012–2025) from the USA, Sweden, Germany, Canada, and international settings included surveys, qualitative interviews, mixed-methods designs, pilot and quasi-experimental implementations, and a Delphi consensus. Patients consistently reported improved comprehension, recall, empowerment, and—in some cases—greater trust. Large surveys identified error detection and patient-initiated corrections as safety mechanisms, while a minority reported worry or feeling judged by wording. Clinicians adapted documentation—modifying tone, wording, or candor—to minimize misinterpretation. Workload effects were generally modest, limited to occasional clarifications. Implementation and expert studies emphasize organizational readiness, training, patient preparation, and privacy-aware portal design as key enablers of safe transparency. Conclusions: In MH, Open Notes function as a communication and engagement tool that strengthens partnership, comprehension, and safety when implemented with attention to risk-sensitive documentation and privacy safeguards.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Monaci, M.; Javaher, S.; Barello, S.
Open Notes in Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Stakeholder Experiences and Implications for Clinical Practice. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2777.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212777
AMA Style
Monaci M, Javaher S, Barello S.
Open Notes in Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Stakeholder Experiences and Implications for Clinical Practice. Healthcare. 2025; 13(21):2777.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212777
Chicago/Turabian Style
Monaci, Michela, Setareh Javaher, and Serena Barello.
2025. "Open Notes in Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Stakeholder Experiences and Implications for Clinical Practice" Healthcare 13, no. 21: 2777.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212777
APA Style
Monaci, M., Javaher, S., & Barello, S.
(2025). Open Notes in Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Stakeholder Experiences and Implications for Clinical Practice. Healthcare, 13(21), 2777.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212777
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.