Next Article in Journal
Childhood Underinsurance in Primary Care: A Practice-Based Study
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Impacts of Extreme Weather Events on Vector-Borne Disease Transmission Across Urban and Rural Settings: A Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Navigating Therapies, Challenges, and Recommendations for Treatment-Resistant Peripartum Depression: A Comprehensive Review

1
Department of Medical Laboratories, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Biochemistry, Jinnah University for Women, Karachi 74600, Pakistan
3
Department of Basic Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(19), 2426; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192426
Submission received: 18 August 2025 / Revised: 14 September 2025 / Accepted: 20 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025

Abstract

Treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD) is a significant public health concern due to the dual imperative of maternal symptom relief and fetal/neonatal safety with complex therapeutic challenges, particularly among expecting mothers worldwide. This comprehensive review focused on current pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression (TRD)/peripartum depression (PPD), highlighting their mechanisms, efficacy, safety profiles, and practical considerations. The search strategy is based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis), using a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for English-language articles published between 2000 and 2024, with a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms for TRD/TRPD. After screening, the initial search yielded 142 articles; only 67 articles were qualified for eligibility and quality assessment. According to related research, pharmacological treatments such as SSRIs or brexanolone and zuranolone can be effective in addressing TRPD challenges, but they carry concerns regarding fetal and neonatal risk. In contrast, non-pharmacological interventions—such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and exercise—offer safe, evidence-based alternatives that are becoming increasingly accessible. Our findings imply that innovative therapeutics and integration of these interventions personalized to individual needs are the optimal clinical approach that may help in balancing maternal symptom control and perinatal safety. Also, expanded mental health infrastructure with enhanced research is essential for advancing TRPD care.

1. Introduction

Peripartum depression (PPD) affects 15–20% of expecting mothers worldwide in the months following childbirth, also called postpartum depression. Effective management of PPD is not only a clinical priority due to profound implications for maternal, fetal, and infant health but also a public health imperative [1,2]. To discriminate between different interlinked terminologies clearly, it is evident that peripartum depression (PPD) is a subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) occurring during pregnancy or within 12 months postpartum. MDD is characterized by persistent low moods, anhedonia, exhaustion, and cognitive deficits lasting at least two weeks. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined as a major depressive episode that fails to respond to at least two adequate antidepressant trials at an adequate dose and duration, consistent with established TRD criteria. TRD significantly impairs maternal health, child development, and family functioning. Treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD) is diagnosed when the challenges of both PPD and TRD occur during the peripartum period [3,4].
Despite multiple antidepressant trials, reported studies observed that up to 40% of peripartum depressed women may not respond to the initial therapy, while up to 60% do not achieve remission [4,5], and these figures may indicate a pressing need to better understand and manage TRD. Treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD) is defined as peripartum depression that fails to remit after at least two adequate trials of antidepressant therapy, consistent with established TRD criteria [6]. TRPD can severely impact a mother’s physical and mental health and ability to form strong attachments to her child, leading to a negative impact on a child’s health, increasing the risk of behavioral problems, cognitive challenges, and developmental delays [7,8,9]. The condition may exhibit a variety of typical symptoms, including consistent sorrow, loss of interest in activities, exhaustion, impatience, changes in appetite, sleep troubles, and concentration difficulties and are linked to certain conditions, according to the DSM-V criteria [10]. In addition, anxiety, mood swings, and suicidal thoughts may occur frequently in individuals with TRPD [11,12].
This review focuses exclusively on maternal treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD), as most available epidemiological data and clinical trials address women, reflecting both the higher prevalence of peripartum depression in mothers and substantial gaps in paternal TRPD research. While paternal peripartum depression affects approximately 10% of fathers, the literature on treatment resistance, unique risk factors, and specific interventions in fathers remains limited due to pervasive stigma and under-recognition in clinical settings. Future reviews should consider this unmet need as this evidence base grows.

1.1. Associated Factors/Comorbidities

A complex interaction of genetic, neurobiological, and psychosocial factors is linked with TRD. Genetic factors have been found to influence both a person’s chance of getting depression and how likely they are to respond to treatment. During the peripartum period, hormonal fluctuations, particularly in estrogen and progesterone, have been associated with increased risk for depression and may contribute to treatment resistance [13].
While psychosocial factors contribute to peripartum depression and may increase TRPD risk, biological mechanisms—such as altered serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine neurotransmitter levels, and HPA axis dysregulation—are also implicated in its pathophysiology [4,14].
TRD is frequently combined with other mental health conditions, such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorders. These comorbidities complicate diagnosis and treatment, and are associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease, reduced quality of life, and functional impairment. Additionally, medical conditions like thyroid dysfunction and chronic pain contribute to reduced productivity and higher healthcare costs, which may further influence the incidence and severity of TRPD [4,14].

1.2. Diagnostics Obstacles

Accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to the complex and varied nature of TRD in individuals with peripartum depression, and its overlap with other mental health problems. Persistent depressive symptoms despite at least two adequate antidepressant trials, in the absence of reliable biomarkers, complicate clinical decision-making [4].
It is important to note that a considerable proportion of evidence for TRPD is extrapolated from general TRD studies. Due to physiological, hormonal, and psychosocial differences in the peripartum period, the generalizability of TRD findings to TRPD may be limited. Dedicated perinatal research is urgently needed.
The present review highlights the current challenges and emerging evidence, with critical assessment of the efficacy and limitations of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and peripartum depression (PPD), to inform clinical practice and guide future research to better support women experiencing treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD).

2. Methods

In the present review, the search strategy is based on PRISMA-Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis criteria [15] to evaluate the current and emerging therapies for individuals with treatment-resistant peripartum depression.
The inclusion criteria were based on a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for English-language articles published between 2000 and 2024. The review focused on (applied filters: abstract, full text, meta-analysis, systematic review) with a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms were used, including (“treatment resistant depression” OR “TRD”) AND (“peripartum depression” OR “postpartum depression” OR “perinatal depression” OR “PPD” OR “treatment resistant peripartum depression” OR “TRPD”) AND (“therapy” OR “treatment” OR “intervention”). Search terms included “peripartum depression”, “postpartum depression”, and “perinatal depression” were not entered as exact phrases to maximize inclusion of international studies and nomenclature, but as Boolean combinations to maximize sensitivity and capture relevant variations in terminology.
Studies were limited by exclusion criteria, including studies not related to peripartum or postpartum depression, outcomes not attributable to women, not a quantitative study, not meeting criteria for treatment resistance (TRD/PPD/TRPD), not published in a peer-reviewed journal, published in another language, and having insufficient information. However, we restricted our inclusion to studies on maternal TRPD to ensure consistency in the population studied and due to the scarcity of high-quality research on paternal TRPD. Likewise, while child developmental outcomes are mentioned in context, our primary focus remains on maternal outcomes and interventions, as dictated by the scope and prevalence of current evidence.
After screening, the initial search yielded 142 articles; only 67 articles were qualified for eligibility. Although this number may limit the generalizability of some conclusions, it provides an analytically manageable and clinically meaningful dataset for review. A larger set may have introduced redundancies or diluted specificity. Most current PPD/TRPD studies are limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in patient populations, and short-term follow-up; this constrains the generalizability of findings and warrants further large-scale, long-term trials. The quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials. Of the 67 included studies, quality appraisal analyses found that 38 were at low risk of bias, 20 at moderate risk, and 9 at high risk. High-quality studies were prioritized in the synthesis. With two independent reviewers’ assessments, discrepancies were resolved by consensus (Figure 1).

2.1. TRPD Current Therapeutics

Numerous interventions were evaluated in the previous studies, including pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and neuro-modulation techniques. Below, we provide a more detailed synthesis of the evidence for each intervention, with emphasis on effectiveness and limitations in the peripartum context. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the targeted pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for TRD and PPD, with details of available drugs, mode of action, and outcomes where available. Table 3 depicts the integrated comparison with various fundamental aspects of these interventions.

2.2. Pharmacological Interventions

Pharmacological interventions for TRD/PPD include switching to a different antidepressant, augmenting current medication, or combining multiple antidepressants. SSRIs are commonly used as first-line pharmacological therapy for peripartum depression, but evidence for their effectiveness in TRPD is mixed. Some studies report modest improvements, but remission rates remain low in this population [6]. Intranasal esketamine [16], immunomodulators [17], and glutamate modulators [18] have been explored in small trials, but data specific to peripartum populations are limited.
The main pharmacological bridge between TRD and PPD is SSRIs and SNRIs, as demonstrated in Table 1, suggesting that, with sertraline considered safest in lactation, brexanolone and zuranolone are unique to PPD [19,20]. The other drugs, such as ketamine/esketamine, show rapid efficacy, while omega-3s are low-risk, evidence-supported adjuncts in both TRPD, especially for severe cases having inflammation-linked symptoms. Emerging evidence indicates that a subset of severe TRPD cases exhibits elevated inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein, interleukin-6), suggesting an inflammation-linked endophenotype. This raises the prospect of targeted immunomodulatory or anti-inflammatory therapies, though further research is needed to clarify treatment response and the impact of perinatal hormonal-immune changes on inflammation-driven depression [20]. Moreover, several agents like MAOIs, TCAs, and atypical antipsychotics are effective in TRD but are not suitable during the peripartum period due to safety concerns.

2.3. Augmentation Strategies

Augmentation Strategies involve adding a second medication to an existing antidepressant regimen. Several medications, such as lithium and atypical antipsychotics, have been investigated as potential augmenting agents in TRD patients [21]. Switching to a different medication and adding adjunctive therapies were associated with a higher likelihood of remission in TRD than augmenting or combining medications [22]. However, there is little data to back up medication used for TRD [6], but most studies excluded peripartum populations, limiting generalizability [23]. Overall, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence specific to TRPD, and most recommendations are extrapolated from general TRD populations.
The other treatment option is the use of adjunctive drugs for non-response or partial response to an antidepressant, including Aripiprazole, Quetiapine, and Risperidone as a first line, and Brexpiprazole, Bupropion, Lithium, Mirtazapine/Mianserin, Modafinil, Olanzapine, Triiodothyronine as a second line, and Esketamine for TRD [24]. A rational pharmacologic approach for TRPD includes reevaluating diagnosis, assessing prior treatment response and tolerability, using adjunctive medications judiciously, discontinuing ineffective medications, and closely monitoring symptoms and adverse effects [25].
Table 1. Targeted pharmacological interventions for TRD and peripartum depression (PPD).
Table 1. Targeted pharmacological interventions for TRD and peripartum depression (PPD).
CategoryAgent/ClassMechanism of Action/ModalityLevel of Evidence (TRD)Level of Evidence (PPD)Main Safety Warnings (Perinatal)References
First-line AntidepressantsSSRIs (e.g., fluoxetine, sertraline)Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitionCommon first-line; often insufficient alone in TRDWidely used; sertraline preferred in breastfeedingGood safety profile; low infant exposure via breast milk[26,27]
SNRIs (e.g., venlafaxine, duloxetine)Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitionUsed when SSRIs fail; moderate efficacyUsed cautiously postpartumVenlafaxine frequently used postpartum; monitor for side effects[26,27]
BupropionDopamine–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitionAlternative option; especially for fatigue, anhedoniaLimited use in breastfeedingLimited data in lactation; caution advised[26]
MirtazapineNoradrenergic and specific serotonergic actionOften used as augmentation; sedation useful in insomniaLimited safety data in lactationConsider if insomnia or appetite loss dominate[26]
VortioxetineMultimodal serotonergic activityModest efficacy in TRD; well toleratedNot commonly used in PPDCognitive benefit in TRD[26,27]
AgomelatineMelatonergic agonist and 5-HT2C antagonistMild-moderate benefit in TRDLimited data in PPDNon-sedative; supports circadian rhythm[26]
Second-line/Other AntidepressantsTCAs (e.g., amitriptyline)Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitionUsed after SSRI/SNRI failureNot typically used in PPDSide effect burden, especially anticholinergic[28]
Quetiapine, trazodoneMulti-receptor activityUsed for augmentation; quetiapine has evidence in TRDNot recommended in PPD due to sedationMonitor metabolic and sedative side effects[28]
Vilazodone, levomilnacipranSerotonergic and norepinephrine/dopamine actionConsidered after SSRI failureLimited to no use in PPDNovel agents, limited perinatal data[28]
MAO InhibitorsPhenelzine, tranylcypromine, etc.Inhibit MAO-A/B, prevent monoamine breakdownHigh efficacy in atypical/TRDContraindicated in pregnancy/lactationDietary restrictions and hypertensive crisis risk[29]
NeurosteroidBrexanolone (IV allopregnanolone)Positive allosteric modulator of GABA-A receptorsNot indicated for TRDFDA-approved for PPDRapid action; 60-hour IV infusion required[19]
Zuranolone
(zurzuvae) oral neurosteroid
positive allosteric modulator of GABA-A receptor)Not indicated for TRDFDA (2023) approved for PPDOral alternative to brexanolone’s IV infusion, with evidence for rapid, sustained symptom control from multiple RCTs.[20]
NMDA Receptor ModulatorsEsketamine (intranasal)NMDA receptor antagonist; enhances glutamate signalingFDA-approved for TRD; rapid effectNot approved in pregnancy; possible postpartum useIn-clinic monitoring due to dissociation[16]
Ketamine (IV)Non-selective NMDA receptor antagonistEffective in 60–70% of TRD casesExperimental use in severe PPDShort-acting; some pilot postpartum trials[18]
(2R,6R)-HNKKetamine metabolite; NMDA-independentPromising early trials; non-dissociativeNot yet studied in PPDStill investigational[30]
Augmentation StrategiesLithium, atypical antipsychoticsEnhance monoamine function; antipsychotic modulationEffective as augmentation in TRDLithium not preferred during breastfeedingRequires serum monitoring; side effect risk[21]
ImmunomodulatorsInfliximab, tocilizumabAnti-cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6) inhibitionPromising in inflammation-related TRDNot approved or studied in PPDOff-label; biomarker-guided therapy[17]
Anti-inflammatory AgentsNSAIDs (e.g., celecoxib), cytokine blockersInhibit peripheral and CNS inflammationModerate benefit in inflamed TRD casesLimited peripartum safety dataGI and cardiovascular risks; adjunctive only[31]
Psychedelic-Assisted TherapyPsilocybin, MDMA5-HT2A receptor agonism, neuroplasticity facilitationRapid effects in trials for TRDNot studied or approved for PPDRequires psychotherapeutic setting[32]
CannabinoidsCBD (cannabidiol)Endocannabinoid modulation, serotonin activityPreliminary TRD evidenceInsufficient safety data for PPDNot FDA-approved; formulation challenges[33]
Novel AgentsKappa opioid antagonists, sigma-1 modulators, etc.Non-monoaminergic targetsEarly-phase trials in TRDNo data in PPDPotential future treatments[34]
Nutritional AdjunctsOmega-3 fatty acids (EPA/DHA)Anti-inflammatory; membrane fluidity; serotonin modulationSafe adjunct in TRDSafe during pregnancy and lactationModest efficacy; neurodevelopmental benefit in PPD[35]
Legend: TRD: treatment-resistant depression; PPD: peripartum depression; SSRIs/SNRIs: selective/serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate; MAO: monoamine Oxidase; EPA/DHA: eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid. Level of Evidence (TRD/PPD) indicates, e.g., “High (multiple RCTs, meta-analyses)/Low (case reports)” or “Low—Not recommended for peripartum use”. Main Safety Warnings (perinatal) (e.g., contraindicated in pregnancy; risk of neonatal withdrawal; limited lactation safety). Note: For each drug/class, despite strong evidence, requires close monitoring in peripartum.

2.4. Non-Pharmacological Interventions

Non-pharmacological interventions for TRD include psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). ECT has demonstrated response rates of 60–70% in severe TRD, including peripartum cases, but stigma and side effects limit its use [36]. Digital therapeutics [37] and virtual reality therapy [38] are evidence-based therapies potentially effective in treating depression, including TRD. Smartphones and other electronic devices can access software-based interventions, or “digital therapeutics,” explicitly designed to treat depression and other mental health conditions. TMS and digital therapeutics have shown promise in non-peripartum TRD, but data in peripartum populations are sparse and further research is needed [39]. Virtual reality therapy and neurofeedback are emerging modalities with limited but growing evidence.
Psychotherapy, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy (IPT), is recommended for TRPD, especially in individuals with a history of trauma or comorbid anxiety disorders. However, there is insufficient evidence to support psychotherapy as a stand-alone treatment for TRPD; most studies suggest benefit as part of a multimodal approach. Lifestyle modifications such as regular exercise, a healthy diet, and stress management may provide additional benefit [40,41].
Table 2. Integrated non-pharmacological interventions for TRD and peripartum depression (PPD).
Table 2. Integrated non-pharmacological interventions for TRD and peripartum depression (PPD).
InterventionModality/MechanismEvidence and EfficacyLevel of Evidence (TRD)Level of Evidence (PPD)Main Safety Warnings (Perinatal)References
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) (including CBTi)Psychotherapy to restructure thoughts and behaviors; CBTi targets insomniaStrong RCT/meta-analysis support; effective monotherapy or adjunct in TRD and PPDWidely used and effectiveStrong efficacy in pregnancy and postpartumSafe during pregnancy/lactation; flexible delivery (teletherapy, group, individual)[42,43]
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)Combines CBT with mindfulness to reduce ruminationEvidence supports relapse prevention in TRDEffective in residual symptoms, relapse preventionLimited data, but likely safe and beneficialGentle, non-invasive, supports emotional regulation[44]
Digital TherapeuticsApp-based CBT and mood regulation toolsGrowing evidence for mild/moderate TRDBeneficial as adjunct or for access-limited patientsUnder investigation for PPDHigh accessibility; digital literacy dependent[37]
Virtual Reality TherapyImmersive environments for therapeutic exposureEmerging data in TRD, especially PTSD comorbidityPromising in emotional regulationNot yet studied in PPDCostly and niche; not first-line[38]
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)Induces seizure via electrical stimulationGold standard in severe TRD (50–70% response)Widely used in refractory TRDRarely used in PPD (case-based)Not first-line in peripartum due to anesthesia/memory concerns[36]
Bifrontal ECTModified ECT with fewer cognitive side effectsComparable efficacy to bilateral ECTConsidered safer cognitively in TRDNo data in PPDStill requires anesthesia[42]
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)Magnetic pulses stimulate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex~50% response in TRD; FDA-approvedWidely used in TRDDemonstrated safety and efficacy in postpartum depressionMedication-free; non-invasive; safe during lactation[45,46,47]
Deep TMS (rdTMS)Reaches deeper cortical and subcortical areasSome evidence of superior efficacy in TRDEffective in TRDNot yet validated for PPDHigh cost, limited availability[48,49]
tDCS (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation)Low current alters cortical excitability30–40% response in TRDUsed as low-cost, portable optionLimited data in PPDTheoretical safety; not mainstream in perinatal settings[50]
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)Implanted electrodes target deep brain regionsUp to 60% response in severe, refractory TRDExperimental in advanced TRDNot applicable in PPDInvasive; contraindicated in pregnancy[51]
NeurofeedbackBrainwave training via real-time feedbackPromising early TRD studiesPotential for self-regulation supportNo current data for PPDTraining-intensive; not routine[52]
Exercise/Physical ActivityEnhances BDNF, endorphins, circadian rhythmStrong efficacy in mild-moderate depression; adjunct in TRDEffective adjunct in TRDReduces PPD symptoms (SMD −0.41 to −0.53)Safe, low-cost, improves physical/mental health[53,54,55]
Mind-Body Practices (e.g., Yoga)Integrates movement, breathing, and mindfulnessBeneficial in both TRD and PPDUsed as adjunctive supportParticularly effective postpartumImproves mood, sleep, and bonding[56]
Peer/Social Support and PsychoeducationGroup sessions, home visits, non-specialist supportStrong community-based evidence in PPDLimited evidence in TRD; emerging in group therapyEffective in reducing PPD, especially in low-resource settingsSafe, culturally adaptable, scalable[57]
Gene TherapyModifies gene expression via viral vectorsPreclinical success in TRD modelsExperimental stage in TRDNo use in PPDEthical issues; not ready for clinical use[58]
Table 2 explains the double comparison between non-pharmacological interventions effective in both TRD and PPD, the CBT and exercise. Efficacious with high safety in perinatal contexts, while rTMS shows strong dual-utility, and is FDA-approved for TRD and supported by meta-analyses in PPD. Peer support is uniquely potent in PPD, especially in low-resource or culturally sensitive contexts; however, several invasive or high-tech interventions (DBS, ECT, VR) are TRD-specific and not applicable to peripartum populations due to safety or practicality. Additionally, Lifestyle interventions such as exercise and yoga offer low-cost, high-accessibility options particularly suited for postpartum recovery and mood support in TRPD.
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions with TRD and PPD in comparison with different aspects like treatment modalities and mechanisms, efficacy and evidence base, safety and side effects, and practical considerations were illustrated in Table 3. It suggests that the pharmacological options remain foundational, especially in moderate to severe cases of TRD and PPD but are often limited due to safety concerns during pregnancy and lactation in PPD. Multimodal strategies and frequent augmentation are the basic requirements for the TRD treatment, while early detection and individualization with low-risk support systems helped PPD interventions. However, non-pharmacological approaches offer safe, effective, and scalable alternatives, especially important in TRPD settings where drug-free treatments are preferred.
Table 3. Integrated comparison of pharmacological vs. non-pharmacological interventions in TRD and PPD.
Table 3. Integrated comparison of pharmacological vs. non-pharmacological interventions in TRD and PPD.
AspectPharmacological InterventionsNon-Pharmacological Interventions
1.Treatment Modalities and MechanismsTRD: Targets monoamine systems (serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine), glutamate (e.g., ketamine), neurosteroids, inflammation. Often biochemical.
PPD: Includes SSRIs, SNRIs, brexanolone, zuranolone (GABA-A modulator), with focus on safety in pregnancy/lactation.
TRD: Includes neuromodulation (ECT, TMS, DBS), psychotherapy (CBT, MBCT), and lifestyle/digital tools. Aims to restore neuroplasticity, cognition, emotional processing.
PPD: Includes CBT/MBCT, rTMS, exercise, peer support, and digital therapies—non-invasive and safe for perinatal populations.
2.Efficacy and Evidence BaseTRD: Esketamine and ketamine offer rapid symptom relief. Antidepressants often need augmentation. MAOIs and glutamatergic agents show promise. Broad evidence base.
PPD: SSRIs, brexanolone, and zuranolone supported by RCTs. Offers rapid onset but is complex to administer. Concerns about breastfeeding and fetal safety persist.
TRD: ECT and rTMS show robust short-term results; CBT/MBCT support long-term remission; digital tools are emerging.
PPD: CBT and MBCT are highly effective; rTMS has growing support; exercise and peer-based support reduce symptoms and promote maternal-infant bonding.
3.Safety and Side EffectsTRD: Risk of sedation, metabolic and cardiovascular side effects; ketamine has misuse potential. Requires monitoring (e.g., lithium levels, MAOI diets).
PPD: Risk of teratogenicity and neonatal effects; brexanolone requires 60-hour infusion under supervision. Breastfeeding exposure is a concern.
TRD: Side effects include cognitive effects (ECT), discomfort (TMS), but minimal systemic toxicity.
PPD: Very safe—no systemic drug exposure. rTMS and CBT are well tolerated. Exercise low-risk when guided. No known adverse effects on fetus or infant.
4.Practical ConsiderationsTRD: Widely available agents; some novel treatments are expensive (e.g., esketamine). Pharmacogenomics in early use.
PPD: SSRIs are first-line but patient hesitancy is common. Brexanolone is costly, IV-only, and underutilized.
TRD: Access limited by cost/availability (TMS, DBS); therapy requires time and engagement. Long-term cost-effective.
PPD: Access challenges for TMS and therapy in some areas; digital and behavioral options increase scalability. High patient acceptance due to safety.

2.5. Critical Appraisal

This review offers valuable pathways toward personalized and safe care for peripartum depression, highlighting that both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions each with unique strengths and limitations.
While pharmacological therapies remain foundational, especially for moderate to severe TRPD, they are often constrained due to fetal or neonatal safety concerns [12]. Despite SSRIs like sertraline having a well-established safety profile during lactation and significant efficacy in moderate to severe cases [59]. Being widely used off-label for PPD with favorable safety data, the absence of FDA approval can lead to insurance restrictions and varying levels of acceptance among clinicians and patients. This drug has strong evidence for efficacy in PPD but is not specifically FDA-approved for PPD; caution is warranted and individual risk–benefit must be considered. Conversely, FDA-approved agents like brexanolone and zuranolone increase access and clinician confidence but face challenges related to cost and delivery (e.g., brexanolone’s 60-hour infusion requirement).
MAOIs have high efficacy in TRD but are not recommended in perinatal populations due to significant safety concerns. Caution is advised with other antidepressants, and shared decision-making is critical, especially during pregnancy, where the balance between maternal benefits and fetal risks must be carefully navigated [60].
Recently, the role of GABA–glutamate dysregulation has emerged as a key mechanism in TRD and TRPD, particularly through modulation of GABA-A receptors. Novel agents like brexanolone and zuranolone, a GABA-A receptor modulator and ketamine analogs specifically approved for PPD, have demonstrated rapid, sustained symptom relief, though access and cost remain barriers [19]. It provides a more practical option for patients while maintaining robust efficacy in improving depressive symptoms within days, and may represent a breakthrough for women who do not respond to traditional antidepressants [19,20].
In contrast, non-pharmacological interventions—notably psychotherapy modalities such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), neurostimulation techniques including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and adjunctive lifestyle interventions such as structured exercise—offer safe, effective, and increasingly accessible alternatives or complements to pharmacotherapy.
These approaches avoid systemic drug exposure and align well with patient preferences for non-medication options, especially during pregnancy and breastfeeding. However, barriers including limited availability, treatment adherence challenges, and costs persist, underscoring the need for expanded infrastructure and integration of digital therapeutics to improve reach. Meta-analyses support CBT and MBCT as highly efficacious for reducing depressive symptoms, while rTMS and physical activity show moderate to strong benefits with minimal risk [57,61,62,63,64,65].
The limited inclusion of peripartum women in clinical trials has left a significant gap in safety data. International bodies are now calling for better-designed studies and registries to ensure evidence-based pharmacological care in this vulnerable population. Personalizing pharmacological strategies in TRPD requires careful assessment of prior treatment responses, safety profiles during pregnancy and lactation, and close symptom monitoring. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these treatments; for those who have not reacted to conventional antidepressant therapy, the fact that so many alternative therapies exist is reassuring that there may still be hope.

2.6. Challenges and Prospects

The preceding sections provided an integrated, section-by-section critique of pharmacological, augmentation, and non-pharmacological strategies, while this section highlights overarching challenges across all approaches.
Treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD) is the worldwide health issue impact people from various cultures and geographical areas, particularly complex for expecting mothers and has significant challenges besides other genders, like common fluctuations in hormonal levels and/or comorbid conditions and family and social pressures, inhibition of willingness to seek treatment, and further exploitation to worsen the depressive symptoms and complicate the treatment of TRPD [66,67].
It is assumed that in clinical practice, the most realistic and effective approach to TRPD is a personalized, multidisciplinary treatment model that judiciously integrates pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. This model prioritizes symptom severity, patient safety, and preference while leveraging the complementary strengths of rapid symptom control via medication and sustainable remission supported by psychotherapy and neurostimulation.
Long-standing depression, variability in treatment response, financial stress, personal and social issues, and women’s reproductive health are other contributing factors that could further complicate the issue, and it may require more intensive and multifaceted treatment approaches to address these challenges. Looking forward, ongoing research into novel agents with improved safety profiles, refinement of neurostimulation protocols, and scalable digital therapeutics hold promises for advancing TRPD care. Equally important is the enhancement of the perinatal mental health services infrastructure to ensure equitable access to comprehensive treatment options.

2.7. Recommendations for TRPD

Early identification of TRPD, close monitoring, and collaborative decision-making with patients are paramount to optimizing outcomes. Strengths of the current literature include growing recognition of the need for tailored approaches in peripartum populations and emerging evidence for novel interventions (e.g., digital therapeutics, neuromodulation). However, weaknesses include small sample sizes, lack of standardized definitions for TRPD, and limited long-term outcome data.
Individual treatment decisions should consider the patient’s preferences, risks, and potential advantages of using pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for TRD/PPD in women. Future studies should work to deepen our comprehension of the root causes and risk factors for TRD/PPD and create secure and efficient treatment alternatives for the women at risk for TRPD and offer prompt and effective alternative therapies; raising awareness and enhancing screening and diagnostic methods is vital. To improve outcomes for this vulnerable population, researchers and clinicians are urged by this critical review to give alternate treatments for TRPD in women with peripartum depression top priority.
An interdisciplinary approach is added in the recommendations involving the team of experts, which may include psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, nutritionists, and other specialists to offer the most appropriate treatment for TRPD patients according to the individual’s needs, with an evidence-based treatment plan.
Furthermore, adopting and adapting effective framework models (e.g., the “Perinatal Mental Health Community Services” model-UK; MumSpace model perinatal depression and anxiety—Australia), that demonstrate investment in multidisciplinary perinatal mental health teams, universal screening, integrated care pathways, and digital mental health solutions can dramatically improve maternal outcomes and service access. Using such proven models in local health systems should be prioritized in future policy and practice initiatives [68,69].
In summary, the future of PPD/TRPD care lies not in choosing between pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, but in strategically combining them to support each woman’s unique needs, values, and life circumstances. Continued research, education, and policy-level commitment are essential to closing the treatment gap and enhancing the mental health of mothers and their children.

3. Conclusions

Treatment-resistant peripartum depression (TRPD) poses a significant clinical challenge due to the complex interplay of maternal physiological changes, fetal safety considerations, and the profound psychosocial impact of untreated maternal mental illness. This review examines various contributing factors, challenges, and recommendations that highlight the potential interventions for the TRD/PPD, which offers a substantial therapeutic issue in women with limited evidence-based treatment options and considerable negative impacts on mother and child health outcomes.
Comparison of the relative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions like SSRIs, brexanolone, and zuranolone demonstrates moderate-to-strong evidence for symptom reduction in TRPD (particularly moderate-to-severe cases), while non-pharmacological methods such as CBT and rTMS also show robust efficacy and often superior safety/tolerability profiles in perinatal women. Meta-analyses suggest that the magnitude of benefit for CBT in mild-to-moderate PPD may equal or exceed that of some pharmacological agents, and combined therapy is recommended for the most resistant cases.
Our findings imply that no one treatment works for all cases of TRPD and that a combination of therapy and an interdisciplinary approach with a team of experts may be the most successful strategy.
Future research should prioritize randomized controlled trials specifically enrolling peripartum individuals with TRD; standardized definitions of treatment resistance and head-to-head comparisons of interventions, with a critical lens on their feasibility, efficacy, and safety within the peripartum context; and also address safety data gaps by including pregnant and lactating participants in clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Supervision, conceptualization, and basic manuscript draft A.Z.W.; methodology, validation, and formal analysis, A.Z.W., S.A. and F.J.; formal analysis A.M.H.M., A.H. and B.A.; critical review M.H., A.G.M. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University (QU-APC-2025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. Should any raw data files be needed in another format, they are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sidhu, G.S.; Sidhu, T.K.; Kaur, P.; Lal, D.; Sangha, N.K. Evaluation of Peripartum Depression in Females. Int. J. Appl. Basic. Med. Res. 2019, 9, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gelaye, B.; Rondon, M.B.; Araya, R.; Williams, M.A. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry 2016, 3, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alzahrani, J.; Al-Ghamdi, S.; Aldossari, K.; Al-Ajmi, M.; Al-Ajmi, D.; Alanazi, F.; Aldossary, A.; Alharbi, A. Postpartum Depression Prevalence and Associated Factors: An Observational Study in Saudi Arabia. Medicina 2022, 58, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guintivano, J.; Manuck, T.; Meltzer-Brody, S. Predictors of Postpartum Depression: A Comprehensive Review of the Last Decade of Evidence. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 61, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al Nasr, R.S.; Altharwi, K.; Derbah, M.S.; Gharibo, S.O.; Fallatah, S.A.; Alotaibi, S.G.; Almutairi, K.A.; Asdaq, S.M.B. Prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yonkers, K.A.; Blackwell, K.A.; Glover, J.; Forray, A.; Stroud, L.R. Antidepressant use in pregnant and postpartum women. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2014, 10, 369–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prenoveau, J.M.; Craske, M.G.; West, V.; Giannakakis, A.; Zioga, M.; Lehtonen, A.; Davies, B.; Netsi, E.; Cardy, J.; Cooper, P.; et al. Maternal postnatal depression and anxiety and their association with child emotional negativity and behavior problems at two years. Dev. Psychol. 2017, 53, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murray, L.; Halligan, S.; Cooper, P. Effects of Postnatal Depression on Mother–Infant Interactions and Child Development. In The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Infant Development; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 192–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stein, A.; Pearson, R.M.; Goodman, S.H.; Rapa, E.; Rahman, A.; McCallum, M.; Howard, L.M.; Pariante, C.M. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet 2014, 384, 1800–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; Psychiatric Publishing: Arlington, VA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Biaggi, A.; Conroy, S.; Pawlby, S.; Pariante, C.M. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 191, 62–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wisner, K.L.; Sit, D.K.; McShea, M.C.; Rizzo, D.M.; Zoretich, R.A.; Hughes, C.L.; Eng, H.F.; Luther, J.F.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Costantino, M.L.; et al. Onset timing, thoughts of self-harm, and diagnoses in postpartum women with screen-positive depression findings. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hill, K.E.; Cárdenas, E.F.; Yu, E.; Hammond, R.; Humphreys, K.L.; Kujawa, A. A systematic review of associations between hormone levels in hair and peripartum depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2025, 171, 107194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meltzer-Brody, S.; Howard, L.M.; Bergink, V.; Vigod, S.; Jones, I.; Munk-Olsen, T.; Honikman, S. Postpartum psychiatric disorders. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 18022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Daly, E.J.; Trivedi, M.H.; Janik, A.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Lane, R.; Lim, P.; Duca, A.R.; Hough, D.; et al. Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019, 76, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kappelmann, N.; Lewis, G.; Dantzer, R.; Jones, P.B.; Khandaker, G.M. Antidepressant activity of anti-cytokine treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of chronic inflammatory conditions. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sanacora, G.; Frye, M.A.; McDonald, W.; Mathew, S.J.; Turner, M.S.; Schatzberg, A.F.; Summergrad, P.; Nemeroff, C.B.; American Psychiatric Association (APA) Council of Research Task Force on Novel Biomarkers and Treatments. A Consensus Statement on the Use of Ketamine in the Treatment of Mood Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 2017, 74, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meltzer-Brody, S.; Colquhoun, H.; Riesenberg, R.; Epperson, C.N.; Deligiannidis, K.M.; Rubinow, D.R.; Li, H.; Sankoh, A.J.; Clemson, C.; Schacterle, A.; et al. Brexanolone injection in post-partum depression: Two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet 2018, 392, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fareed, A.; Vaid, R. FDA approval of Zurzuvae (zuranolone) to combat postpartum depression. Clin. Med. Insights Psychiatry 2023, 14, 11795573231208983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rafeyan, R.; Papakostas, G.I.; Jackson, W.C.; Trivedi, M.H. Inadequate Response to Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder: Augmentation and Adjunctive Strategies. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2020, 81, OT19037BR3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nierenberg, A.A.; Fava, M.; Trivedi, M.H.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Thase, M.E.; McGrath, P.J.; Alpert, J.E.; Warden, D.; Luther, J.F.; Niederehe, G.; et al. A comparison of lithium and T(3) augmentation following two failed medication treatments for depression: A STAR*D report. Am. J. Psychiatry 2006, 163, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Spielmans, G.I.; Berman, M.I.; Linardatos, E. Adjunctive atypical antipsychotic treatment for major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of depression, quality of life, and safety outcomes. PLoS Med. 2013, 10, e1001403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Voineskos, D.; Daskalakis, Z.J.; Blumberger, D.M. Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Challenges and Strategies. Neuropsychiatry Dis Treat. 2020, 16, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kennedy, S.H.; Lam, R.W.; McIntyre, R.S.; Tourjman, S.V.; Bhat, V.; Blier, P.; Hasnain, M.; Jollant, F.; Levitt, A.J.; MacQueen, G.M.; et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 3. Pharmacological Treatments. Can J. Psychiatry 2016, 61, 540–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Crescenzo, F.; Perelli, F.; Armando, M.; Vicari, S. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for postpartum depression (PPD): A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J. Affect. Disorder. 2014, 152–154, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dimcea, D.A.; Petca, R.C.; Dumitrașcu, M.C.; Șandru, F.; Mehedințu, C.; Petca, A. Postpartum Depression: Etiology, Treatment, and Consequences for Maternal Care. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Daly, E.J.; Singh, J.B.; Fedgchin, M.; Cooper, K.; Lim, P.; Shelton, R.C.; Thase, M.E.; Winokur, A.; Van Nueten, L.; Manji, H.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2018, 75, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thomas, S.J.; Shin, M.; McInnis, M.G.; Bostwick, J.R. Combination therapy with monoamine oxidase inhibitors and other antidepressants or stimulants: Strategies for the management of treatment- resistant depression. Pharmacotherapy 2015, 35, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zanos, P.; Moaddel, R.; Morris, P.J.; Georgiou, P.; Fischell, J.; Elmer, G.I.; Alkondon, M.; Yuan, P.; Pribut, H.J.; Singh, N.S.; et al. NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature 2016, 533, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Raison, C.L.; Rutherford, R.E.; Woolwine, B.J.; Shuo, C.; Schettler, P.; Drake, D.F.; Haroon, E.; Miller, A.H. A randomized controlled trial of the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab for treatment-resistant depression: The role of baseline inflammatory biomarkers. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Goodwin, G.M. The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: Past, present, and future. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 2105–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blessing, E.M.; Steenkamp, M.M.; Manzanares, J.; Marmar, C.R. Cannabidiol as a potential treatment for anxiety disorders. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Elias, E.; Zhang, A.Y.; Manners, M.T. Novel Pharmacological Approaches to the Treatment of Depression. Life 2022, 12, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mischoulon, D.; Nierenberg, A.A.; Schettler, P.J.; Kinkead, B.L.; Fehling, K.; Martinson, M.A.; Hyman Rapaport, M. A double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid for depression. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2015, 76, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lupi, M.; Martinotti, G.; Santacroce, R.; Cinosi, E.; Carlucci, M.; Marini, S.; Acciavatti, T.; di Giannantonio, M. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review of Scientific Literature. J. ECT 2017, 33, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mantani, A.; Kato, T.; Furukawa, T.A.; Horikoshi, M.; Imai, H.; Hiroe, T.; Chino, B.; Funayama, T.; Yonemo, N.; Zhou, Q.; et al. Correction: Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as an Adjunct to Pharmacotherapy for Refractory Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018, 20, e11702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mills, J.C.; Harman, J.S.; Cook, R.L.; Marlow, N.M.; Harle, C.A.; Duncan, R.P.; Bengtson, A.M.; Penc, B.W. Comparative effectiveness of dual-action versus single-action antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people living with HIV/AIDS. J. Affect. Disord. 2017, 215, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lisanby, S.H.; Husain, M.M.; Rosenquist, P.B.; Maixner, D.; Gutierrez, R.; Krystal, A.; Gilmer, W.; Marangell, L.B.; Aaronson, S.; Daskalakis, Z.J.; et al. Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: Clinical predictors of outcome in a multisite, randomized controlled clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34, 522–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dennis, C.L.; Falah-Hassani, K.; Shiri, R.; Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Treatment Outcomes Study of Depression during Pregnancy Team. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 2017, 210, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Daley, A.J.; Foster, L.; Long, G.; Palmer, C.; Robinson, O.; Walmsley, H.; Ward, R. The effectiveness of exercise for preventing and treating antenatal depression: A systematic review with meta-analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holtzheimer, P.E.; Husain, M.M.; Lisanby, S.H.; Taylor, S.F.; Whitworth, L.A.; McClintock, S.; Slavin, K.V.; Berman, J.; McKhann, G.M.; Patil, P.G.; et al. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A multisite, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2012, 1, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, X.; Laplante, D.P.; Paquin, V.; Lafortune, S.; Elgbeili, G.; King, S. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for perinatal maternal depression, anxiety and stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2022, 92, 102129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. McGirr, A.; Van den Eynde, F.; Tovar-Perdomo, S.; Fleck, M.P.; Berlim, M.T. Effectiveness and acceptability of accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: An open-label trial. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 173, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sitaram, R.; Ros, T.; Stoeckel, L.; Haller, S.; Scharnowski, F.; Lewis-Peacock, J.; Weiskopf, N.; Blefari, M.L.; Rana, M.; Oblak, E.; et al. Author Correction: Closed-loop brain training: The science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 20, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, C.; Pan, W.; Jia, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Ren, Y.; Ma, X. Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 294, 113543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cox, E.Q.; Killenberg, S.; Frische, R.; McClure, R.; Hill, M.; Jenson, J.; Pearson, B.; Meltzer- Brody, S.E. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of postpartum depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 264, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brunoni, A.R.; Moffa, A.H.; Sampaio-Junior, B.; Borrione, L.; Moreno, M.L.; Fernandes, R.A.; Fregni, F. Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2523–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.M.; Kwon, J.Y. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: Systematic review & meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Trifu, S.; Sevcenco, A.; Stănescu, M.; Drăgoi, A.M.; Cristea, M.B. Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy as a potential first-choice treatment in treatment-resistant depression (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Strauss, C.; Cavanagh, K.; Oliver, A.; Pettman, D.; Hayward, M. Mindfulness-based interventions for people diagnosed with a current episode of anxiety or depressive disorder: A meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Coppola, G.; Cortese, F.; Bracaglia, M.; Di Lorenzo, C.; Serrao, M.; Magis, D.; Pierelli, F. The function of the lateral inhibitory mechanisms in the somatosensory cortex is normal in patients with chronic migraine. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2020, 131, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shirayama, Y.; Chaki, S. Neurochemistry of the nucleus accumbens and its relevance to depression and antidepressant action in rodents. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2006, 4, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Poyatos-León, R.; García-Hermoso, A.; Sanabria-Martínez, G.; Álvarez-Bueno, C.; Cavero- Redondo, I.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. Effects of exercise-based interventions on postpartum depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Birth 2017, 44, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Marconcin, P.; Peralta, M.; Gouveia, É.R.; Ferrari, G.; Carraça, E.; Ihle, A.; Marques, A. Effects of Exercise during Pregnancy on Postpartum Depression: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. Biology 2021, 10, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schuch, F.B.; Vancampfort, D.; Rosenbaum, S.; Richards, J.; Ward, P.B.; Stubbs, B. Exercise improves physical and psychological outcomes in people with depression: A meta-analysis including the evaluation of control group response. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 241, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sockol, L.E.; Epperson, C.N.; Barber, J.P. A meta-analysis of treatments for perinatal depression. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 31, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. DeRubeis, R.J.; Hollon, S.D.; Amsterdam, J.D.; Shelton, R.C.; Young, P.R.; Salomon, R.M.; O’Reardon, J.P.; Lovett, M.L.; Gladis, M.M.; Brown, L.L.; et al. Cognitive therapy vs. medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2005, 62, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stewart, D.E.; Vigod, S.N. Postpartum Depression: Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Emerging Therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Med. 2019, 70, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yonkers, K.A.; Wisner, K.L.; Stewart, D.E.; Oberlander, T.F.; Dell, D.L.; Stotland, N.; Ramin, S.; Chaudron, L.; Lockwood, C. The management of depression during pregnancy: A report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2009, 31, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Peng, L.; Fu, C.; Xiong, F.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, Z.; Chen, L.; He, C.; Wei, Q. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression symptoms and cognitive function in treating patients with postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 290, 113124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Silang, K.; MacKinnon, A.; Madsen, J.; Giesbrecht, G.F.; Campbell, T.; Keys, E.; Freeman, M.; Dewsnap, K.; Jung, J.W.; Tomfohr-Madsen, L.M. Sleeping for two: A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT I) delivered in pregnancy and secondary impacts on symptoms of postpartum depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 362, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Daley, A.; Jolly, K.; MacArthur, C. The effectiveness of exercise in the management of post-natal depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam. Pract. 2009, 26, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, L.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y. Summary of the effect of an exercise intervention on antenatal depression and the optimal program: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023, 23, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Saharoy, R.; Potdukhe, A.; Wanjari, M.; Taksande, A.B. Postpartum Depression and Maternal Care: Exploring the Complex Effects on Mothers and Infants. Cureus 2023, 15, e41381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. O’Hara, M.W.; Wisner, K.L. Perinatal mental illness: Definition, description and aetiology. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 28, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mouliou, D.S. C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians. Diseases 2023, 11, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Howard, L.M.; Khalifeh, H. Perinatal mental health: A review of progress and challenges. World Psychiatry 2020, 19, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Milgrom, J.; Garner, B.; Rodrigues, A.; Fisher, J.; Borninkhof, J.; Kavanagh, D.; Gemmill, A.W. National Implementation of Perinatal Mental Health Treatment—The MumSpace Digital Stepped-Care Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The mechanism for selecting records related to the study according to the PRISMA guidelines.
Figure 1. The mechanism for selecting records related to the study according to the PRISMA guidelines.
Healthcare 13 02426 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wasti, A.Z.; Almutairi, S.; Huq, M.; Hussain, A.; Mackawy, A.M.H.; Jabeen, F.; Alharbi, B.; Memon, A.G.; Ahmed, M. Navigating Therapies, Challenges, and Recommendations for Treatment-Resistant Peripartum Depression: A Comprehensive Review. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192426

AMA Style

Wasti AZ, Almutairi S, Huq M, Hussain A, Mackawy AMH, Jabeen F, Alharbi B, Memon AG, Ahmed M. Navigating Therapies, Challenges, and Recommendations for Treatment-Resistant Peripartum Depression: A Comprehensive Review. Healthcare. 2025; 13(19):2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wasti, Afshan Zeeshan, Sarah Almutairi, Mohsina Huq, Amal Hussain, Amal Mohamad Husein Mackawy, Farah Jabeen, Basmah Alharbi, Anjuman Gul Memon, and Mawahib Ahmed. 2025. "Navigating Therapies, Challenges, and Recommendations for Treatment-Resistant Peripartum Depression: A Comprehensive Review" Healthcare 13, no. 19: 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192426

APA Style

Wasti, A. Z., Almutairi, S., Huq, M., Hussain, A., Mackawy, A. M. H., Jabeen, F., Alharbi, B., Memon, A. G., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Navigating Therapies, Challenges, and Recommendations for Treatment-Resistant Peripartum Depression: A Comprehensive Review. Healthcare, 13(19), 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop