Next Article in Journal
Healthy Movement Leads to Emotional Connection: Development of the Movement Poomasi “Wello!” Application Based on Digital Psychosocial Touch—A Mixed-Methods Study
Previous Article in Journal
Smoking Abstinence Self-Efficacy, Decisional Balance, and Quitting Desire Among Adult Smokers in Saudi Arabia: Gender-Based Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Contributing Factors to Burnout in Healthcare Professionals—Does Emotional Intelligence Play a Protective Role? A Narrative Review

by
Ioana Ruxandra Stoian-Bălăşoiu
1,2,
Liliana Veronica Diaconescu
1,*,
Alexandra Ioana Mihăilescu
1,2,*,
Sabina Stan
3,
Adela Magdalena Ciobanu
2,4 and
Ovidiu Popa-Velea
1
1
Department of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Psychiatry, “Prof. Dr. Alexandru Obregia” Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry, 041914 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Special Psychopedagogy, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania
4
Neuroscience Department, Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(17), 2156; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172156
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Revised: 18 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025

Abstract

Background: In light of the concerning increase in burnout among healthcare professionals, it is essential to identify the specific factors that contribute to this phenomenon and can be addressed. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on the relationship between burnout and emotional intelligence (EI) among healthcare professionals, alongside additional factors that may influence both concepts. Methods: A structured search in OVID, PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000–2024) was conducted. The inclusion criteria were English language and peer-reviewed studies assessing both burnout and EI in healthcare professionals. The exclusion criteria were non-English papers, studies without EI–burnout correlation, or involving non-healthcare populations. Thirty-one eligible studies were included in this analysis. Results: The findings suggest a consistent inverse correlation between EI and burnout across various healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, and residents. Higher EI was associated with reduced levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and a greater sense of personal accomplishment. Burnout was found to be prevalent among younger healthcare workers, particularly residents, with contributing factors including exposure to workplace violence, high workload, and diminished psychological ownership. In contrast, associations that suggest protective influences on emotional intelligence included spiritual intelligence, self-control, income, and healthy habits, such as sufficient sleep and physical activity. Conclusions: This narrative review highlights a consistent inverse association between EI and burnout in healthcare professionals. Given that both burnout and EI are affected by adjustable individual and organizational elements, specific interventions aimed at enhancing EI and improving workplace conditions may provide effective techniques to boost clinician occupational well-being and performance.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the prevalence of burnout syndrome among healthcare workers has sharply increased, estimated to be double that reported in the general population [1]. According to the recent literature, half of the investigated doctors technically meet the criteria for burnout [2], even if they do not complain or act as professionally impaired.
Maslach and Leiter consider burnout as a „breakdown in the relationship of people and their work” [3], which occurs as a psychological syndrome response to the exposure to chronic personal and interpersonal stressors associated with the job. Although it does not constitute a disease, the profound impact this psychological phenomenon has on the individual makes it essential to take into consideration when evaluating the development of all aspects of one’s life. It includes three dimensions:
  • Emotional exhaustion (EE), perceived by the individual as an emotional depletion, as if „their reserves are consumed” [1];
  • Depersonalization (DP), characterized by a subjective feeling of detachment and even diminished empathy [4];
  • Decreased sense of personal accomplishment (PA), which can distort one’s self-evaluation of their work and leads them to feel less competent [5].
The consequences of burnout can influence both physical and mental health, and they might vary from muscle tension, sleep disorders, anxiety, cognitive dysfunction, social disconnection, or depression [6]. As a whole, burnout and its outcomes can surpass the professional level and significantly decrease the overall functionality and well-being. Sometimes, burnout evolution can go as far as to contribute to the development of a serious condition, making it rather an extensive problem than a syndrome in itself. Moreover, burnout can be self-perpetuated by inadequate coping strategies and reluctance in seeking support from others, possibly accentuating the stigma around seeking help [7,8].
In the long term, all these effects can influence not only health professionals but also their patients and families. Possible mechanisms involved include, for example, the higher risk of taking careless decisions, poor communication, and an overall decline in their professional performance [9].
Since burnout has such an impact on a great array of domains in an individual’s life and because it can have such a great toll on how one’s work is perceived and influenced, it becomes increasingly important to identify the variables contributing to its occurrence. They include individual and organizational factors. Specific individual factors comprise the presence of certain individual traits, such as high neuroticism and low resilience, alexithymia, and perfectionism [10,11], alongside maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as avoidance, denial, substance use, and a lack of emotional regulation [7]. A distinct category of individual factors is represented by demographic variables (e.g., age and gender), with lower age and female gender being correlated with a higher predisposition to burnout, an effect which could be due to lower resilience [12].
When it comes to the organizational factors that predispose individuals to burnout, a meta-analysis conducted by Bria et al. [13] concluded that perceived stress, high workload, and the imbalance between personal and professional life were the most frequently identified contributors. In addition, the level of work experience, core organizational values, and perceived recognition of work were also identified as key environmental variables in the development of burnout [14,15,16].
In regard to protective factors, a meta-analysis conducted by de Mendonça et al. [17] indicated that higher emotional intelligence (EI) can play a protective role against burnout risk, with similar effects observed from mindfulness, stress-management strategies, time-management skills, and self-care practices [18,19]. Organizational factors preventing or delaying burnout include work–life balance, meaningful work, a positive workplace culture, and good-quality relationships with colleagues and superiors [20,21]. Among the abovementioned factors, EI plays a distinctive role, as it has not only a protective role against burnout, but also a significant positive effect on overall well-being and on the wise use of stress-management skills [22]. Accordingly, EI is a concept that has triggered a lot of debate and has been studied consistently in relation to the individual capacities to adapt and succeed in social environments [23].
The concept of EI can be considered either a set of abilities or a set of personality traits, referring to one’s capacity to understand, express, and regulate one’s own or others’ emotions [24]. Literature data point out that individuals who are able to experience emotions with clarity and who can process them effectively are more efficient at applying mood-regulation strategies. These skills transcend individual use and can be applied to interpersonal relationships [25]. When the management of emotions is put into action, the interacting experience becomes a more empathetic one [26]. According to the model structured by Goleman [27], EI is associated with five major personality traits:
  • Self-awareness represents an individual’s ability to recognize their own emotions, as well as the impact of those emotions on other people;
  • Self-management (or self-regulation) assumes the recognition of negative emotions, as well as controlling and forwarding them toward a more productive purpose;
  • Inner motivation represents the tendency to be driven by values and passion, not only by external reward;
  • Social awareness includes the ability to manage and guide the relationships with others;
  • Empathy represents the capacity to understand and share the feelings of others [24,28].
The consistent study of EI in the current literature and the rise in the popularity of the concept itself are challenged by a number of difficulties:
-
A methodological heterogeneity in approach, making it more complicated to reach a consensus [24,29];
-
Diversity when it comes to cultural and contextual differences regarding work ethic, work–life balance, or the approach of expressing feelings in certain regions. In the context of obtaining most of the data used by self-administered questionnaires, the cultural stigma or bias may be important contributors to the accuracy of data. The individualistic vs. collectivist models can also shape the way not only work is perceived, but also how individuals tend to seek or receive support and guidance [30].
Regarding challenges in understanding how exactly EI influences burnout, the exact mechanism is still unclear. According to Glenn [31], EI could improve coping strategies and emotional regulation, enhance the use of social support, and even influence stress-response, but the precise underlying mechanisms are yet unknown. Furthermore, the multitude of individual psychological factors associated with EI and their interdependence increases the difficulty of pinpointing a specific pattern. According to the Job–Demands–Resources model (JD-R) of burnout, EI can act as a personal resource that regulates the demands of the job that contribute to burnout and buffers their personal impact, alongside building resilience. In other words, although EI does not change or eliminate job demands, it better equips the individual against these adversities [32]. According to Hobfoll et al., the Conservation of Resources Theory, higher EI levels act as a personal resource that could mediate the loss of individual resources that occurs in burnout, by offering the individual better skills to both prevent resource loss and further gain additional resources, employing techniques like emotional regulation, building social support, and developing alternative coping mechanisms [33].
According to a study conducted by Di Gesto et al., psychological inflexibility and difficulties in emotional regulation may play a crucial role when it comes to the levels of perceived stress, meaning that employees who displayed difficulties in regulating emotions were more prone to display psychological inflexibility, which, furthermore, had an impact on stress perception [34].
When focusing on healthcare workers, better EI skills should result in better communication, increased empathy toward the patients and their families, and, therefore, a better therapeutic relationship [35]. However, when it comes to applying the same skills to oneself, it is debatable if having better-developed emotional skills is efficient in delaying or even preventing the effects of chronic occupational stress. Furthermore, one’s ability to regulate their emotions could also be impacted by various factors, such as the leadership style they work under, workload, and exposure to suffering. The gap in the existing literature is related to the limited understanding of how different factors, especially emotional intelligence, interact to influence the development of burnout among healthcare workers and the lack of evidence-based strategies to improve protection against these risk factors.
This study aims to investigate the relationship between EI and burnout in healthcare workers following three research questions (RQ):
RQ 1: What is the burnout prevalence among healthcare workers, and what are the main contributing factors to burnout?
RQ 2: Does EI play a role in protecting against burnout?
RQ 3: Which additional factors influence EI in healthcare workers?

2. Materials and Methods

The present work is a narrative review, with its reporting quality checked against the SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) criteria, with all items addressed to ensure methodological transparency and rigor. A narrative approach was chosen due to the heterogeneity of study designs, populations, and instruments used to assess EI and burnout, which made a systematic synthesis inappropriate but facilitated a comprehensive mapping and interpretative integration of the evidence on the relationship between healthcare workers’ EI and burnout while also identifying additional modulating factors relevant for targeted interventions.
A structured literature search that focused on the topics of EI and burnout in healthcare workers was conducted in OVID, PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for English-language studies published between January 2000 and April 2024. Search terms combined “emotional intelligence” AND (“burnout” OR “the burnout syndrome”) IN (“healthcare workers” OR “healthcare professionals” OR “doctors” OR “nurses” OR “physician” OR “residents”), using Boolean operators and filters for language and time frame. The last search was conducted on 17 February 2025.
Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies in English, focused on healthcare professionals, and that investigated the correlation between EI and burnout.
The exclusion criteria were represented by studies focused on students or personnel who did not work in a hospital and veterinarians, centered only on a limited number of burnout components (such as emotional exhaustion or depersonalization), or those that did not correlate EI to burnout. To enhance accuracy, only peer-reviewed articles were included; the grey literature (e.g., conference proceedings, preprints, dissertations) was excluded.
Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted study data, with disagreements resolved through discussion. This process is summarized in Figure 1 (PRISMA-like format for transparency).
Titles and abstracts were evaluated to eliminate irrelevant papers (e.g., non-English publications, research involving non-healthcare populations—veterinarians, teachers, administrative staff, medical students, or those not addressing both emotional intelligence and burnout). Full texts were examined to verify eligibility. To improve conceptual clarity, we excluded studies examining only single components of burnout (e.g., emotional exhaustion) or emotional intelligence (EI). Since some of the articles also studied additional factors both in correlation to EI and burnout, the narrative approach allowed us to also incorporate this additional information.
The first search yielded 360 hits; after deduplication, 233 titles/abstracts were screened, and 165 were excluded. Of 38 full texts reviewed, 7 were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria (reasons detailed in Supplementary Table S1), resulting in 31 studies included in the final synthesis.

3. Results

3.1. General Findings

Table 1 shows a summary of the study’s characteristics, instruments, and principal findings.
All 31 articles presented in Table 1 measured EI, burnout, and the correlation between them. Sample sizes varied from 28 to 12,704 respondents, covering a large cultural background and demographical diversity. Eleven articles were specifically focused on resident doctors; eight articles focused on nurses, and five on doctors. Seven articles studied healthcare workers with different professions combined (doctors, nurses, interns, physical therapists, and other caregivers). The comparatively high number of studies centered on residents illustrates their depiction in the current literature as one of the most predisposed categories to burnout.
All identified articles were published within the last 15 years, which could also indicate an increasing interest in the study of EI potential benefits, on the one hand, and the increasing burnout prevalence in healthcare workers, on the other hand.
Across all identified articles, burnout syndrome was consistently understood as an occupational phenomenon, resulting from the prolonged exposure to work-related stress, while EI was seen as the ability to recognize, understand, manage, and even change individual emotions or the emotions of others.
Given the great variability in both EI and burnout instruments, we acknowledge that this might impact the association between the two concepts by slightly influencing the conceptual framework of the already subjective variables.

Measurement and Interpretation of Constructs

Burnout. When it comes to measuring burnout levels, most of the identified studies (22) opted for using The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI); studies used either the MBI-HSS (human services; domains: Emotional Exhaustion [EE], Depersonalization [DP], Personal Accomplishment [PA]) or the MBI-GS (general survey; domains: Exhaustion, Cynicism, and Professional Efficacy). Importantly, higher PA/Professional Efficacy reflects lower burnout; higher EE/DP (or Exhaustion/Cynicism) reflects higher burnout. Although both scales employ a three-dimensional approach to burnout, the MBI-HSS specifically targets helping professions preferring depersonalization as a domain, rather than cynicism, which would be more tailored for this professional category than the general population. Because included studies used non-equivalent instruments, we interpreted scores within the instrument rather than pooling raw ranges.
We also included studies using the Brief Burnout Questionnaire (CBB), which also approaches burnout as a three-dimensional concept, in a short and accessible form; The Tedium Index, which is an instrument rather focusing on exhaustion as a unidimensional element; The Questionnaire for the Assessment of Occupational Burnout Syndrome (CESQT), which comprises four subscales—enthusiasm toward work, psychological exhaustion, indolence and brings as a novelty element the concept of guilt, comparing to other tools; The Link Burnout Questionnaire (LBQ), which also structures burnout as a four-dimensional concept, comprising psychological exhaustion, relationship deterioration, sense of failure and psychosomatic complaints; The Oldenburg Burnout inventory (OBLI), containing two core dimensions, exhaustion and disengagement; and the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM), which views burnout as a three-dimensional concept focused around exhaustion: physical fatigue, emotional exhaustion and cognitive weariness. This diversity reflects, in part, the various conceptualizations of the burnout syndrome, which resulted in a multitude of measurement instruments that overlap to some extent [36]. Accordingly, results are summarized per instrument and domain, avoiding cross-tool pooling.
Emotional intelligence (EI). We classify EI measures as (a) ability-based tests (e.g., MSCEIT) that score performance on emotion tasks, and (b) trait/self-report measures (e.g., TEIQue/TEIQue-SF, WLEIS, SSEIT, EIS). Although the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) is a standard ability-based measure, none of the included studies employed it. All studies in this review used The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQ) (13 studies) or its short form, TEIQ-SF, which measures self-reported emotional traits, like emotion regulation and self-awareness, followed by the use of The Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS), which evaluates skills like emotion perception or social skills. The other instruments used to determine the levels of EI were The Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT), which is based in the Mayer–Salovey model, in a self-report format; The Brief Inventory of Emotional Intelligence for Adults (EQ-i-20M), which is more frequently used in clinical settings and in the workplace; The Trait Meta-Mood Scale 24 (TTMS-24), which distincts itself by focusing on the metacognitive component of emotions; The Swinburne University Emotional Intelligence Test, which evaluates empathy, emotion management, and social skills; The Nurses Job Emotions Scale (NJES), used to evaluate job-specific emotions; The Emotional Quotient Test, based on the mixed-models of EI; The Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire of Cyber or sharing EI, which takes into consideration EI in digital interactions; The Scale of Emotional Functioning: Health Service Provider, focusing on EI in healthcare providers; and The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), which comprises four dimensions: self-emotional appraisal, others’ emotion appraisal, use of emotion, and emotional regulation. Trait EI instruments often report facets, such as self-emotions appraisal, others’ emotion appraisal, use of emotions, and regulation, or broader domains such as well-being, self-control, emotionality, and sociability. Where reported, we extracted facet-level results to reduce over-generalization. According to a review conducted by Bru-Luna et al. [37], there has been an increase in the number of instruments used to measure EI, with over 40 scales available at the time being. This reflects both the increasing interest in the concept and its utility, but also the difficulty of constructing objective criteria to measure EI.
Table 1. Characteristics of the 31 studies included in the narrative review of country of origin, study design, participant characteristics, EI, and burnout measurement tools; main findings are for all included studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of the 31 studies included in the narrative review of country of origin, study design, participant characteristics, EI, and burnout measurement tools; main findings are for all included studies.
No.Study TitleAuthors, Position in Reference ListYearCountryStudy DesignSample SizeType of PersonnelInstruments Used for Measuring BurnoutInstruments Used for Measuring EIMain Findings
Correlations Between Burnout and EIFactors Contributing to BurnoutModulating Factors for EI
1The Influence of Emotional Intelligence on Job Burnout of Healthcare Workers and Mediating Role of Workplace Violence: A Cross-Sectional StudyCao, Y., Gao, L., Fan, L., Jiao, M., Li, Y., & Ma, Y. [38]2022ChinaCross-sectional2061Physicians, nurses, and medical techniciansMBI-GSEISEI was significantly negatively associated with all three dimensions of job burnoutExposure to violence is correlated with higher burnoutFemale gender significantly correlated with higher EI
2Effect of spiritual intelligence, emotional intelligence, psychological ownership, and burnout on caring behaviour of nurses: a cross-sectional studyKaur, D., Sambasivan, M., Kumar, N. [39]2013MalaysiaCross-sectional550NursesMBI-HSSSSEITNurses with higher levels of EI suffer lower levels of burnoutPsychological ownership correlates with lower levels of burnoutSpiritual intelligence influences EI
3Association of Burnout With Emotional Intelligence and Personality in Surgical Residents: Can We Predict Who Is Most at Risk?Lindeman, B., Petrusa, E., McKinley, S., Hashimoto, D. A., Gee, D., Smink, D. S., … & Phitayakorn, R. [40]2017United StatesLongitudinal cohort 143Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFBurnout scores were significantly inversely correlated with all 4 facets of EI and EI totalFemale sex and older age are associated with higher burnout levels. Agreeableness and positive work experiences were inversely correlated with burnoutEI global scores decrease significantly with age
4Burnout is Associated With Emotional Intelligence but not Traditional Job Performance Measurements in Surgical ResidentsCofer, K. D., Hollis, R. H., Goss, L., Morris, M. S., Porterfield, J. R., Chu, D. I. [41]2018United StatesCross-sectional40Resident doctorsMBI-HSSTEIQ-SFThe mean EI scores were lower in residents with burnout than in residents without burnout
5The Contribution of Emotional Intelligence to the Components of Burnout: The Case of Health Care Sector ProfessionalsÜnal, Z [42]2014TurkeyCross-sectional136Trainees, interns, nurses, and doctorsMBIEISEI has a positive contribution to PA but negative contributions to EE and DPMarried individuals report lower levels of burnout
6Burnout Risk and Protection Factors in Certified Nursing AidesMolero Jurado, M. D. M., Pérez-Fuentes, M. D.C., Gázquez Linares, J.J.G., Simón Márquez, M. D.M., Martos Martínez, Á. [43]2018SpainCross-sectional278NursesCBBEQ-i-20MBurnout Syndrome score is significantly related negatively to all the EI factorsLower age is linked to a higher burnout risk; the group of professionals with a permanent contract showed a significantly higher mean score in burnout
7Exploring the relationship between burnout and emotional intelligence among academics and clinicians at King Saud UniversityAlmeneessier, A.S., Azer, S. A. [44]2023Saudi ArabiaCross-sectional126Medical academics, doctorsMBI-HSSTEIQ-SFAn inverse interrelation was reported between burnout and EIWorkplace risk factors for burnout: workload, job control, lack of a supportive environment, recognition and rewards, equitability, and organizational valuesIn contrast with other studies, we reported that EI and its elements were higher in men than in women, which can be explained by cultural differences
8Emotional intelligence, workplace conflict, and job burnout among critical care physicians: a mediation analysis with a cross-sectional study design in EgyptKasemy, Z. A., Sharif, A. F., Bahgat, N.M., Abdelsattar, S., Latif, A.A. A. [45]2023EgyptCross-sectional144DoctorsMBITEIQEI could significantly predict job burnout across various dimensions, and it showed a negative association with EE, depersonalisation, and reduced personal achievement.Age and years of experience, conflict management skills, and CoQ10 levels have a negative correlation with burnout. Exposure to violence and inadequate resources and facilities had a positive correlation with burnout levelsConflict management and CoQ10 levels exhibited positive correlations with EI
9The Effect of Emotional Intelligence on Burnout in Healthcare ProfessionalsNăstasă, L. E., Fărcaş, A. D. [46]2015RomaniaCross-sectional120Doctors and nursesMBIEISThe level of burnout experienced by the medical personnel did not correlate with the level of EI development.The burnout syndrome is felt more acutely by women
10Analysis of the Risk and Protective Roles of Work-Related and Individual Variables in Burnout Syndrome in NursesPérez-Fuentes, M. D.C., Molero Jurado, M. D.M., Martos Martínez, Á., Gázquez Linares, J. J. [47]2019SpainCross-sectional1236NursesCBBEQ-I-M20There was a negative association between burnout and various factors of EISpending more time with colleagues and patients and reporting good-quality relationships exhibits a negative relationship with burnout. Nurses with permanent contracts had a higher mean score for burnout than those on temporary contracts
11Emotional Intelligence in Internal Medicine Residents: Educational Implications for Clinical Performance and BurnoutSatterfield, J., Swenson, S., Rabow, M. [48]2010United StatesCross-sectional28Resident doctorsThe Tedium IndexEISEI scores increased over the course of an academic year, and higher year-end scores correlated with less burnout and higher overall clinical performance and interviewing ratings.
12Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Psychosocial Risks on Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Nurses’ Health during the COVID-19 PandemicSoto-Rubio, A., Giménez-Espert, M.D.C., Prado-Gascó, V. [49]2020SpainCross-sectional125NursesCESQTTMMS-24The emotional repair component stands out as an element of EI that should be enhanced to prevent the possible adverse effects of psychosocial risks on nurses, specifically those related to burnout, psychosomatic complaints, and job satisfaction.
13Emotional Intelligence and Burnout in Surgical Residents: A 5-Year StudyGleason, F., Baker, S.J., Wood, T., Wood, L., Hollis, R.H., Chu, D.I., Lindeman, B. [50]2020United StatesLongitudinal cohort236Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFBurnout scores showed significant inverse correlation with the 4 domains of EI, total job resources score, and all 4 sub-domains of job resources.Individuals who were subjected to disruptive behaviors (particularly others taking credit for work and public humiliation) were more likely to experience higher burnout levels. Each additional PGY year demonstrated an incremental increase in burnout
14Relationship of Emotional Intelligence and Burnout among MBBS Doctors of Himachal PradeshKaul, I., Reddy, K.J. [51]2022IndiaCross-sectional190DoctorsMBISSEITA highly negative correlation is found between EI, EE, and DP, and a positive correlation between EI and PA
15The Relationship between Burnout Syndrome and Emotional Intelligence in Healthcare ProfessionalsVlachou, E. M., Damigos, D., Lyrakos, G., Chanopoulos, K., Kosmidis, G., Karavis, M. [52]2016GreeceCross-sectional148Doctors, nurses, and physical therapistsMBITEIQ-SFThere is a positive relationship between EI and Burnout syndrome, as EI acts protectively against Burnout syndrome and even reduces it
16The role of Emotional Intelligence in healthcare professionals’ burnoutArnone, R., Cascio, M.I., Parenti, I. [53]2019ItalyCross-sectional148Doctors, nurses, and other caregiversLBQSSEITThere is a negative and significant correlation between Burnout and EI
17Emotional intelligence as a moderator in the stress–burnout relationship: a questionnaire study on nursesGörgens-Ekermans, G., Brand, T. [54]2012South AfricaCross-sectional122NursesMBIThe Swinburne University Emotional Intelligence TestConsistent inverse relationships between emotional control and management as dimensions of EI, and stress and burnout emerged. A differential effect of high vs. low EI on the stress–burnout relationship was evident.Workload and the work/family interface emerged as significant predictors of burnout
18Emotional Intelligence Buffers the Effects of Negative Emotions on Job Burnout in NursingSzczygiel, D. D., Mikolajczak, M. [55]2018PolandCross-sectional188NursesOLBINJESNegative emotions do not always lead to burnout, but they particularly do for nurses who lack EI.
19The Role of Emotional Intelligence on Health Care Professionals’ Occupational Stress and BurnoutTiwari, S., Bhagat, D. [56]2020IndiaCross-sectional388Nurses and DoctorsOLBIEmotional Quotient TestThe dimensions of EI, emotional sensitivity, emotional maturity, and emotional competency have been reported to significantly predict all seven dimensions of occupational stress and the dimensions of burnout, and the order and strength of the predictors differ across the two groups of healthcare professionals.A positive relationship was found between age, working experience, and stress, with younger healthcare professionals and those with a shorter length of service experiencing more stressEI levels increased with the age and experience of the respondents on emotional intelligence
20The Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Job Stress on Burnout: A Structural Equation Model among Hospital NursesSamaei, S.E., Khosravi, Y., Heravizadeh, O., Ahangar, H. G., Pourshariati, F., Amrollahi, M. [57] 2017IranCross-sectional300NursesMBI-HSSThe Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire of Cyber or sharing-EIThere was meaningful relationship between EI and job stress with nurses’ occupational burnout. The EI was effective on job stress A significant difference was found in correlation with income–the higher income correlated with increasing EI levels
21Evaluating and Exploring Variations in Surgical Resident Emotional Intelligence and BurnoutBeierle, S.P., Kirkpatrick, B.A., Heidel, R.E., Russ, A., Ramshaw, B., McCallum, R.S., Lewis, J.M. [58]2019United StatesLongitudinal cohort86Resident doctorsMBIScale of Emotional Functioning: Health Service ProviderThe data confirm an inverse relationship between EI and burnout
22The Mediating Role of Emotion Management, Self-Efficacy, and Emotional Intelligence in Clinical Nurses Related to Negative Psychology and BurnoutYu, C., Liu, Z., Zhao, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Lin, A., … & Wan, H. [59]2023ChinaCross-sectional12,704NursesMBI-GSETSEI among nurses could reduce the incidence of burnout
23Emotional intelligence, perceived stress, and burnout among resident doctors: An assessment of the relationshipSwami, M. K., Mathur, D.M., Pushp, B.K. [60]2013IndiaCross-sectional56Resident doctorsSMBMTEIQThere is a significant negative correlation between burnout and trait EI and a positive correlation with perceived stress, indicating that burnout is probably influenced by perception of stress and EI.
24Associations between emotional intelligence and doctor burnout, job satisfaction, and patient satisfactionWeng, H.C., Hung, C.M., Liu, Y.T., Cheng, Y.J., Yen, C.Y., Chang, C.C., Huang, C.K. [61]2011TaiwanObserva-tional 110DoctorsMBIWLEISHigher EI was significantly associated with less burnout and higher job satisfaction. In addition, less burnout was not only associated with higher levels of patient satisfaction but also with higher levels of job satisfaction.
25Correlation among Perceived Stress, Emotional Intelligence, and Burnout of Resident Doctors in a Medical College of West BengalMitra, S., Sarkar, A.P., Haldar, D., Saren, A.B., Lo, S., Sarkar, G.N. [62]2018IndiaCross-sectional63Resident doctorsSMBMTEIQBurnout had a significant positive correlation with perceived stress and negative correlation with EI-well-being and positive correlation with EI-self-control and sociability.
26Self-control as mediator between emotional intelligence and burnout among doctorsJahanzeb, Z., Parveen, S., & Khizar, U. [63]2023PakistanQuantita-tive 150DoctorsMBIEISEI is negatively correlated with burnout. The result showed a significant negative correlation between burnout and self-control.Burnout appears to be a more female experience, with women reporting it at a higher rate than men
27Emotional Intelligence and Burnout in Plastic Surgery Residents: Is There a Relationship?Bin Dahmash, A.B., Alhadlaq, A.S., Alhujayri, A.K., Alkholaiwi, F., Alosaimi, N.A. [64]2019Saudi ArabiaCross-sectional37Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFThere is a positive correlation between higher levels of EI and sense of personal achievement, whereas a negative correlation was observed between higher levels of EI and EE and DP among the residents in this study.Significant risk factors for burnout included dissatisfaction with plastic surgery as a career choice, dissatisfaction with income, and dissatisfaction with the role in the operating room
28Emotional Intelligence, Burnout, and Wellbeing Among Residents as a Result of the COVID-19 PandemicKirkpatrick, H., Wasfie, T., Laykova, A., Barber, K., Hella, J., Vogel, M. [65]2022United StatesCross-sectional81Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFEI continues to partially protect our residents’ burnout and well-being. The COVID-19 pandemic’s initial surge appeared to negatively alter the protective effect of residents’ emotional intelligence on their burnout and well-being in our community hospital.
29Burnout and well-being of medical and surgical residents in relation to emotional intelligence: A 3-year studyWasfie, T., Kirkpatrick, H., Barber, K., Hella, J., Lange, M., Vogel, M. [66]2024United StatesLongitudinal77Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFEI was inversely related to burnout and distress and is related to wellness factors in this community–hospital–based resident study sample.
30Emotional Intelligence and Burnout Among Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery ResidentsSharaf, A. M., Abdulla, I.H., Alnatheer, A.M., Alahmari, A.N., Alwhibi, O.A., Alabduljabbar, Z., … & Alkholaiwi, F.M. [67]2022Saudi ArabiaCross-sectional51Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFThis study showed that surgical specialty residents with higher EI levels had a lower risk of burnout One extra sleeping hour is associated with a 0.44-unit increase in the average EI score; the average EI score was 0.52 units higher in residents who exercised than in those who did not
31Longitudinal study of emotional intelligence, well-being, and burnout of surgical and medical residentsWasfie, T., Kirkpatrick, H., Barber, K., Hella, J. R., Anderson, T., Vogel, M. [68]2023United StatesLongitudinal 80Resident doctorsMBITEIQ-SFEI is associated with well-being and burnout in individual residents

3.2. RQ 1: What Is the Burnout Prevalence Among Healthcare Professionals and Which Are the Main Contributing Factors to Burnout?

Despite using a wide variety of instruments and identifying a large range of burnout prevalence, most of the studies—with only two exceptions [39,42]—concluded that burnout represents a substantial problem for healthcare workers. In each of the identified studies, medical personnel were at risk of developing burnout and even presented symptoms in some cases (Table 1). For instance, in the study conducted by Lindeman et al. [40], 51% of the evaluated resident doctors met criteria for high burnout, and only 9% had low levels or no burnout. In the study with the largest sample size [59], 12,704 clinical nurses from 32 general hospitals across China were investigated using the MBI-GS scale, resulting in moderate scores of EE (15.87, SD 6.02), moderate scores of DP (10.80, SD 5.09), and significant scores of decreased PA (25.53, SD 8.65). Overall, they were assessed as displaying moderate to high burnout, with a tendency to experience psychiatric comorbidities in the form of anxiety and depression.
Among MBI-based studies, higher EI consistently aligned with lower EE/DP (or Exhaustion/Cynicism) and higher PA/Professional Efficacy (i.e., lower burnout). OLBI-based studies converged on lower Exhaustion/Disengagement with higher EI; SMBM-based studies showed lower Physical Fatigue/Emotional Exhaustion/Cognitive Weariness at higher EI. Because thresholds and scaling differ across tools, we report direction and domain rather than pooled raw ranges.
Since 16 of the identified articles used the Maslach Burnout Inventory, we analyzed their comparative results. Across them, EE ranged from 3.41 to 31.24 (a score of less than 18 means low EE, and over 27 signifies high levels of EE). DP levels varied from 2.2 to 11.9 (scores lower than 5 meaning low levels of DP, and above 10 indicating higher levels of DP). PA ranged from 2.84 to 38.13 (levels under 33 mean high levels of PA, and levels over 40 mean low PA). In MBI-type instruments, higher PA/Professional Efficacy indicates greater accomplishment and lower burnout, whereas higher EE/DP (or Exhaustion/Cynicism) indicates higher burnout.
Several studies identified additional factors involved in burnout development. By categories, they were depicted as follows:
(a)
demographic factors (age and gender);
(b)
psychological variables (e.g., psychological ownership and agreeableness);
(c)
physiological factors (e.g., coenzyme Q10–CoQ10 levels);
(d)
environmental variables (exposure to violence, positive work experience, workload, type of work contract, dissatisfaction with career choices).
(a)
Demographic factors
When it comes to gender influence in burnout, several studies [40,46,63] pointed out that higher burnout levels were correlated with female gender.
Regarding age and work experience, Lindeman et al. [40] reported a higher risk of burnout with increased age, whereas other studies [43,45,56] found a negative correlation between age and experience and burnout levels. Sharaf et al. [67] also pointed out that the risk for burnout increased sharply at the beginning of residency training.
(b)
Psychological variables
According to the study included in our review by Kaur et al. [39], psychological ownership (PO) among medical personnel creates a sense of responsibility, which influences behavior and was found to have a negative relationship with burnout. The concept of PO represents a state in which an individual feels as though the target of ownership—whether it is a job or an organization—is theirs; therefore, one’s possessions are felt as extensions of the self. PO can mitigate the effects of burnout by giving employees greater autonomy over their work, fostering more meaning in their efforts, and making the entire distressing experience feel more meaningful [69].
Furthermore, in another study included in our review, Lindeman et al. [40] pointed out in their longitudinal cohort that the personal trait of agreeableness was inversely correlated with burnout. The trait of agreeableness refers to a person’s tendency to be considerate towards others, polite, and compassionate.
(c)
Physiological factors
A study conducted by Kasemy et al. [45] found a correlation between the functioning of the immune system, as expressed in individual CoQ10 levels, and burnout: higher burnout levels seem to deplete the body’s CoQ10 reserves, therefore making the protective mechanisms weaker. CoQ10 is a vitamin-like compound with roles in energy production and antioxidant protection.
(d)
Environmental variables
Ünal [42] identified marital status as a factor contributing to burnout protection, with married individuals reporting lower burnout levels.
Cao et al. [38] identified exposure to violence as a strong burnout predictor, with up to 98% of respondents experiencing verbal violence in the last year, and the personnel exposed to violence displaying higher levels of burnout.
In the longitudinal study conducted by Lindeman et al. [40], positive work experience showed a strong inverse correlation with individual burnout. The magnitude of the relationship for positive work experience was larger than that for negative work experience, proving that an overall positive work experience might have a protective role against burnout in surgical residents. Resident doctors examined in a longitudinal study by Gleason et al. [50] were more prone to burnout if their work environment was aversive and if they were subject to disruptive behaviors, especially when others took credit for their work or exposed them to public humiliation. Dissatisfaction with their career choice, the low income, and the marginal role in the operating room were also factors contributing to resident doctors’ burnout, according to Kirkpatrick et al. [65].
Some studies [43,47] have identified the type of work contract as a contributing factor for burnout development. These authors claim that nurses with a permanent work contract also displayed a higher risk for burnout.
Finally, as expected, high workload was a significant factor contributing to burnout [44,54]. This data is consistent with the findings of other papers not included in this review.

3.3. RQ 2: Does Emotional Intelligence Play a Role in Protecting Against Burnout?

With the exception of the study conducted by Năstasă & Fărcaş [46], all the other papers included in this review identified EI as an important contributor in the protection against burnout (Table 1). The concerns mentioned above, despite not identifying a significant correlation between EI and burnout levels in the examined population, still point out a relationship between EI and personal accomplishment in healthcare workers, which, in turn, leads to the authors’ conclusion about the need to develop EI in this work category. As a confirmatory finding, higher EI in the categories of healthcare professionals was negatively associated with burnout by the studies included in this review (Table 1), except for the aforementioned one. Among the studies that employed the most commonly used assessment instrument for burnout, MBI, and the three-dimensional model (EE, DP, and PA), all of them, except the one mentioned before, found that high levels of EI were inversely correlated with EE and DP and directly correlated with PA. In the longitudinal studies identified [58,66,68], higher baseline EI was associated with lower burnout scores at follow-up; however, potential confounding by demographic or occupational factors cannot be ruled out.

3.4. RQ 3: Which Additional Factors Influence EI in Healthcare Workers?

Some of the researched studies [38,39,40,67] identified several additional factors significantly related to EI (age, experience, gender, spiritual intelligence, PO, perceived stress levels, income, exercise levels, and sleep hours).
From a longitudinal perspective, PO, spiritual intelligence, and low perceived stress were not only correlated with EI, but also had a significant association with burnout.
When it comes to age and experience influence on EI levels, Lindeman et al. [40] found that EI global scores decreased significantly with increasing age, while Tiwari & Bhagat [56] found a significant positive correlation between EI and age.
In terms of gender, many studies were inconclusive about which gender is more EI-privileged, although the association of gender with EI seemed significant. Cao et al. [38] reported higher EI in women, while Almeneessier et al. [44] found higher EI in men.
Ünal and Molero Jurado et al. [42,43] did not find any correlation of EI to gender or age and explained this finding through other cultural differences rather than feminine stereotypes, potentially obscuring the role of gender.
The study conducted by Tiwari & Bhagat [56] found a positive correlation between EI and income, which could be explained by the EI skills potentially playing a key role in successful careers, especially if they have a higher social exposure.
Sharaf et al. [67] identified an association between EI and healthy daily habits (sleep and exercise). Specifically, they found that the average number of sleeping hours was correlated with the total EI score, and that one extra hour of sleeping a night is associated with a 0.44-unit increase in the average EI score (using the TEIQue-SF). The same study showed that exercise determined a 0.52-unit increase in EI in residents who exercised, compared to those who did not.

4. Discussion

The primary goals of this review were (a) to assess the prevalence of burnout in healthcare professionals and highlight the contributing factors to burnout; (b) to identify whether EI provides protection against burnout, and (c) to expose additional variables contributing to EI and which could potentially be subject to change.

4.1. Burnout Prevalence and Variability

In terms of burnout prevalence in healthcare professionals, this has been a consistently reported issue, which has additionally grown in interest since the COVID-19 pandemic [70]. In the studies we identified, burnout rates were not always explicitly stated, since most of them focused on the correlations between burnout and predictive variables. However, those who reported burnout prevalence displayed great variability, from low burnout (2.15 on the MBI scale) [39] to high or even alarming burnout, with up to 70% from the maximum values [38]. This great variability can be explained by the heterogeneity of the used instruments and protocols, the substantial array of geographical and cultural backgrounds covered by the included studies, where only a few of them put their conclusions in the context of socioeconomic or income-related frameworks, making the comparison of results across regions difficult, and the use of self-reported questionnaires, which may have induced bias by itself, via the underreporting or overreporting of emotional distress and burnout symptoms.
Amongst the articles that used the MBI, high global burnout scores were mostly associated with high EE, DP, or both. According to Maslach & Leiter [71], EE is considered to be the closest parameter to a conventional stress variable, making it more reliable in predicting burnout-related symptoms.
All the identified articles have been published within the last 15 years, illustrating an obvious increase in interest in the topic. A number of factors could explain this, such as the official recognition of burnout as an “occupational phenomenon” by the World Health Organization [72]. The COVID-19 pandemic may have also played an important role, not only in the increased demands that the medical system had to face, but also in the way that work–life balance has been perceived since [70].
Furthermore, the exposure of mental health issues has recently grown, while the stigma around talking about one’s struggles has steadily decreased. As more and more people come forward to testify about their professional and personal struggles, the need to identify their root causes and address them as early as possible has become imperative [73]. It is also important to keep in mind when analyzing this data that there is great variability in care settings, various specialties, and even the different distribution of resources among various places.
Regarding the gender influence on burnout, the identified studies stated that women were more prone to burnout development. According to a review conducted by Purvanova & Muros [74], these differences stem most probably from higher reporting of burnout by women, specifically when it comes to the EE component. As stated before in the literature, the EE component tends to be considered the most representative for burnout, while, at the same time, it is typically easily identified by women [75]. Self-reporting bias associated with cultural stereotypes surrounding masculine traits may also be involved, with men being less likely to report exhaustion, in order not to be perceived as either weak or unprofessional [76]. To avoid this bias and make future studies more reliable, it could be helpful to use qualitative methods and cross-cultural validation of psychometric instruments assessing burnout and, specifically, EE. Using terminology that is not gender-specific or culture-specific could also assist in reducing the existing research biases.
When it comes to age and work experience, several identified studies [43,45,56,66] found that the lack of experience associated with young age and the beginning of residency was correlated with higher burnout, while, oppositely, Lindeman et al. [40] pointed out that there is a tendency for burnout to increase with age. The first result was supported by a meta-analysis by Brewer & Shapard [77], which concluded that higher burnout levels have been correlated with lower age and less job experience, and by a separate study conducted by Gómez-Urquiza et al. [78], who found that younger age was a significant risk factor for the EE and DP component of burnout and less influential regarding PA. The sharp increase in prevalence of burnout at the beginning of residency may be explained by the multitude of changes in a young professional’s life, such as gaining responsibility, changes in schedule and workload, all the while not yet having the experience to effectively cope with these new challenges. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that interventions applied at this point in the medical career, targeting resident support and mentorship, are important for addressing this problem and preventing its aggravation.
Factors found as having a protective role against burnout were two-fold: individual (PO, agreeableness, and CoQ10 levels), but also environmental (marital status, exposure to violence, workload, positive work experiences, and dissatisfaction with career choices). Some of these factors (such as workload, PO, and exposure to violence) are circumstantial, so they can be targeted by personalized interventions. A good example is PO, with strategies increasing its leading to higher autonomy, especially by being given decision-making power, promoting hands-on contributions, the use of group symbols, and non-monetary recognition, such as public acknowledgement [79]. These outcomes may not only contribute to a more cohesive work environment and increased personal well-being, but also improve PA scores [80].
Agreeable healthcare professionals tend to reframe patient interaction as more meaningful than draining; they tend to develop better workplace relationships and even have lower rates of conflict due to their prosocial behavior [81]. According to Roberts et al. [82], the idea of personality plasticity implies that certain traits, such as agreeableness, could improve with consistent practice by employing multiple strategies, such as social skill training, reinforcement of the prosocial behavior, perspective taking, and even cognitive intervention techniques. Increasing agreeableness could not only have an impact on individual burnout, but could also have a substantial effect on the therapeutic relationship and perceived quality of care [83].
The decrease in CoQ10 levels as a consequence of exhaustion could be effectively targeted by using nutritional supplements, according to Tsai et al. [84]. The use of CoQ10-only formulations proved to be more effective than CoQ10 compounds, and the longer duration of the treatment had a positive correlation to fatigue reduction. CoQ10 supplementation could, thereby, represent an additional tool, alongside psychological interventions, in the comprehensive targeting of burnout.
Marital status was identified as playing a protective role against burnout development. These findings are consistent with a meta-analysis conducted by Cañadas-De la Fuente et al. [85], who reported that individuals with single or divorced marital statuses are exposed to higher burnout. In contrast, married individuals would benefit from protection against burnout through an array of mechanisms, of which social support plays a key role.
Regarding work-associated environmental factors, exposure to violence was linked to increased burnout, this being supported by other literature data [86,87]. Adding violence prevention to larger organizational plans for employee well-being, like mental health assistance, systematic debriefing after events, and encouraging a culture of self-reporting, can make employees more resilient and less likely to burnout. Weng et al. [61] found that the EI development could be useful in preventing burnout, not only directly, but also mediated by less exposure to violence. Individual trainings in EI development, self-defense, and de-escalating techniques, alongside changes in logistics and workplace design (such as an increase in safety strategies and increased security), may be effectively employed to address or prevent burnout [88,89].
In terms of work stability, healthcare workers with temporary contracts are exposed to a higher risk of burnout because of higher perceived insecurity, but also as a result of often higher workload or fewer paid hours. Personal resources, such as resilience and EI, could act as compensating factors in such work conditions. Their positive role is also reported among employees who have a stable job but feel like caught in a trap, with more administrative tasks, less meaningful work time, and without any exit options [90].
Since both workload and dissatisfaction with career choices were found to increase burnout, while positive work experience might have a protective role, organizational interventions may prove to be of critical importance. Alongside the aforementioned mentorship programs for residents, an early target component might be vocational assistance, in order to help with early career dissatisfaction.

4.2. Protective Role of EI

Trait/self-report emotional intelligence (EI) tests assess individuals’ self-perceptions of their emotional capabilities and include affective dispositions such as self-control, adaptability, and emotion regulation, which are directly pertinent to managing stress and emotional demands. The same self-report methodology employed in numerous burnout assessments may also enhance the observed relationships. On the other hand, ability-based EI tests, like tests of how well someone can understand and manage emotions, are less affected by personality traits and self-perceptions. They may have a more indirect effect on burnout by improving problem-solving and interpersonal effectiveness. As a result, correlations may be more pronounced for trait/self-report emotional intelligence than for ability emotional intelligence.
In terms of the correlation between burnout and EI, our selected studies identified an inverse relationship, which was identified in the existing literature not only for EI as a whole, but also for its distinct subcomponents (well-being, self-control, emotionality, and sociability) [91]. Specifically, Mitra et al. [62] pointed out that burnout had a significant negative correlation with EI’s well-being component and a positive correlation with self-control and sociability. Among distinct EI components, self-control seems to have an important role, as it is connected to adaptability in changing environments, but also with personal values and personal accomplishments [92]. The study conducted by Jahanazeb et al. [63] claims that self-control has a direct inverse relationship to burnout, with higher self-control ensuring a better control of emotional reactions to stressors, which, in turn, lowers the risk of burnout. Encouraging self-control (via therapies like mindfulness training, cognitive–behavioral methods, and programs that boost emotional intelligence) may not only be a valuable strategy to prevent or delay burnout, but also to impede mental illness resulting from the failure of emotional self-regulation mechanisms. The inclusion of such programs seems to have substantial benefits among healthcare students and residents [40,43,93,94]. About one-third of the research took place during or after the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating that stresses associated with the pandemic may partially explain the diversity in burnout–emotional intelligence relationships. Longitudinal data, when available [40,50,58,66,68], indicate that higher baseline emotional intelligence (EI) correlates with reduced subsequent burnout after controlling for relevant factors. Conversely, it is also plausible that prolonged emotional exhaustion may diminish perceived EI or weaken emotional regulation capabilities over time. In addition, unquantified contextual variables—such as workload, staffing ratios, leadership methodologies, moral discomfort, and recurrent exposure to suffering—may obscure discerned correlations. These factors highlight the necessity for prospective, controlled research to elucidate causal pathways and guide focused interventions.

4.3. Factors Influencing EI

The gender-related influences regarding EI levels in the identified articles showed either higher EI in women or men, or did not find any correlation of EI with gender or age. This is explained, as in the case of the relationship gender–burnout, as being possibly influenced by cultural differences, particularly by feminine stereotypes, potentially obscuring the role of gender. In the current literature, many studies were inconclusive about which gender is more EI-privileged, although the association of gender with EI seemed significant. Some studies in the current literature [95,96] reported higher EI in women, while, on the other hand, Almeneessier et al. [44] found higher EI in men. The higher number of articles reporting EI as more prevalent in women may result from the dimensions of EI tightly related to “feminine” stereotypes (such as emotional attention, emotional regulation, and emotional clarity), therefore potentially creating a self-reporting bias [97]. In order to address this taxonomy-induced misinterpretation, future studies could use gender-neutral language in the self-reported questionnaires.
Regarding the connection between age and EI, the identified articles found inconsistent associations, with some of them [40,56] stating that either higher or lower age was related to higher EI, while others [41,42] claimed that age plays no role. The study conducted by Cabello et al. [95] found that EI levels varied with age according to a U-inverted curve, with younger and older adults scoring lower than middle-aged adults. Another study conducted by Fariselli et al. [98] concluded that several components of EI increase with age, whereas others do not, further raising the issue of the selection of the EI components potentially developing through training. These findings emphasize the importance of future research focused on specific EI domains and their development in relation to other variables.
The studies included in this review identified a positive correlation between high EI and higher income. This could be important at least from two perspectives: firstly, the choice of EI-developing strategies could be influenced by the existing outcome, thereby limiting the access of low-income individuals to all kinds of programs of EI development. Secondly, EI could predict income itself, making its development a path to better societal rewards. This hypothesis is backed up by the results of a recent meta-analysis by Sanchez-Gomez et al. [99], who found that, after taking all the other variables into consideration, participants who displayed higher levels of EI and emotional-repair capacities had higher salaries, making EI one of the relevant variables when talking about building professional success.
The included papers suggested a positive relationship between sleep, exercise, and EI. This is consistent with the results of Killgore et al. [100], who found that sleep duration and habitual sleep quality are both independently associated with self-perceived dispositional aspects of EI. These benefits are further supported by the study by Sepdanius et al. [101], who also found a positive correlation between sleep quality and EI. Acebes-Sánchez et al. [102] found a gender-specific positive effect of physical activity, associated with higher emotional clarity and emotional repair in men and higher emotional attention in women. These findings could be the subject of a series of chain-related individual interventions. Therefore, by tackling the development of healthy habits such as the ones described, not only could the individual improve EI levels, but ultimately, indirectly prevent burnout.

5. Limitations and Future Directions

This study has several limitations. It was run as a narrative review, so some relevant articles may have been excluded. This review was limited to peer-reviewed journal articles published in English, which may introduce language and publication bias; the grey literature was not included. Duplicate sample risk was minimized by screening author lists, affiliations, and study periods; where overlaps were suspected, the most complete dataset was retained. This review was not preregistered; however, eligibility criteria, search strategy, and data extraction procedures were defined a priori to minimize hindsight bias. Other limitations were derived from the heterogeneity of scales used for evaluating burnout and EI, the self-reporting method, and the heterogeneity of the cultural backgrounds of respondents and the variations in study quality. Most included studies relied on self-reported EI and burnout instruments, which may introduce common-method bias and inflate associations. Although the general focus was on health professionals, these studies included medical personnel from different categories and specialties as participants, each of them having particular burnout and EI characteristics. Future research should address these limitations through preregistered, longitudinal, and multicenter designs employing standardized or ability-based EI instruments. Comparative analyses across professional groups would clarify whether certain specialties benefit differently from EI-based interventions. Mechanistic studies are required to elucidate how specific the EI traits interact with distinct burnout dimensions. Furthermore, intervention studies in addressing burnout—such as mindfulness-based stress reduction [103] and EI-enhancing training—should evaluate not only clinician well-being but also organizational outcomes (e.g., absenteeism, turnover) and patient-related endpoints (e.g., satisfaction, quality of care).

6. Conclusions

The current paper had the main goal to analyze the connection between burnout and EI in healthcare professionals. During this research, it became increasingly obvious that burnout syndrome has evolved to become a significant concern for employees in the healthcare sector. In this context, the identified protective role of EI is important because it suggests EI as both a potential target and a promising instrument against professional exhaustion; therefore, employing EI-enhancing strategies could help address the root causes of burnout. Furthermore, expanding our understanding of this connection could offer a theoretical framework that might prove useful in redefining strategies in high-stress fields. Among the determinants of EI, many may be integrated into individual and organizational interventions. Although the current study was not specifically focused on evaluating the comparative efficacy of direct vs. indirect (e.g., EI-enhancing) burnout-reducing strategies, this topic is very attractive for future research, considering its potential for building cost-effective systems of psychological support for healthcare professionals, reducing turnover, and guiding organizational policies in healthcare.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare13172156/s1, Table S1: Full-text articles excluded with reasons (n = 7).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.R.S.-B. and O.P.-V.; methodology, I.R.S.-B., A.I.M. and O.P.-V.; software, L.V.D. and A.I.M.; validation, I.R.S.-B., L.V.D., A.M.C. and O.P.-V.; formal analysis, A.I.M. and S.S.; investigation, I.R.S.-B., L.V.D. and A.I.M.; resources, L.V.D., A.I.M. and O.P.-V.; data curation, S.S. and O.P.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R.S.-B. and A.M.C.; writing—review and editing, L.V.D., A.I.M., S.S. and O.P.-V.; visualization, A.I.M., A.M.C. and O.P.-V.; supervision, I.R.S.-B., L.V.D., A.M.C. and O.P.-V.; project administration, S.S. and O.P.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
EIEmotional Intelligence
EEEmotional Exhaustion
DPDepersonalization
PAPersonal Accomplishment
POPsychological Ownership

References

  1. Grow, H.M.; McPhillips, H.A.; Batra, M. Understanding physician burnout. Curr. Probl. Pediatr. Adolesc. Health Care 2019, 49, 100656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shalaby, R.; Oluwasina, F.; Eboreime, E.; El Gindi, H.; Agyapong, B.; Hrabok, M.; Agyapong, V.I.O. Burnout among residents: Prevalence and predictors of depersonalization, emotional exhaustion and professional unfulfillment among resident doctors in Canada. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Maslach, C.; Leiter, M.P. New insights into burnout and health care: Strategies for improving civility and alleviating burnout. Med. Teach. 2017, 39, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, S. Preventing and Managing Burnout: What have we learned. Biomed. J. 2018, 2, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E.; Leiter, M.P. Maslach Burnout Inventory. In Evaluating Stress: A Book of Resources; Scarecrow Education: Lanham, MD, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tavella, G.; Hadzi-Pavlovic, D.; Parker, G. Burnout: Redefining its key symptoms. Psychiatry Res. 2021, 302, 114023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bittner, J.G.; Khan, Z.; Babu, M.; Hamed, O. Stress, burnout, and maladaptive coping. Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011, 96, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Canu, I.G.; Marca, S.C.; Dell’Oro, F.; Balázs, Á.; Bergamaschi, E.; Besse, C.; Wahlen, A. Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2021, 47, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, S. Burnout and doctors: Prevalence, prevention and intervention. Healthcare 2016, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Popa-Velea, O.; Diaconescu, L.V.; Gheorghe, I.R.; Olariu, O.; Panaitiu, I.; Cerniţanu, M.; Spinei, L. Factors associated with burnout in medical academia: An exploratory analysis of Romanian and Moldavian physicians. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Genly, B. Safety and job burnout: Understanding complex contributing factors. Prof. Saf. 2016, 61, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  12. McKinley, N.; Karayiannis, P.N.; Convie, L.; Clarke, M.; Kirk, S.J.; Campbell, W.J. Resilience in medical doctors: A systematic review. Postgrad. Med. J. 2019, 95, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bria, M.; Băban, A.; Dumitraşcu, D.L. Systematic review of burnout risk factors among European healthcare professionals. Cogn. Brain Behav. Interdiscip. J. 2012, 16, 423–452. [Google Scholar]
  14. Renger, D.; Miché, M.; Casini, A. Professional Recognition at Work: The Protective Role of Esteem, Respect, and Care for Burnout Among Employees. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 62, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dahiya, R.; Raghuvanshi, J. Do values reflect what is important? Exploring the nexus between work values, work engagement and job burnout. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2023, 31, 1414–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liao, T.; Liu, Y.; Luo, W.; Duan, Z.; Zhan, K.; Lu, H.; Chen, X. Non-linear association of years of experience and burnout among nursing staff: A restricted cubic spline analysis. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1343293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. de Mendonça, N.R.F.; de Santana, A.N.; Bueno, J.M.H. The relationship between burnout and emotional intelligence: A meta-analysis. Rev. Psicol. Organ. E Trab. 2023, 23, 2471–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Klein, A.; Taieb, O.; Xavier, S.; Baubet, T.; Reyre, A. The benefits of mindfulness-based interventions on burnout among health professionals: A systematic review. Explore 2020, 16, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hricová, M. The mediating role of self-care activities in the stress-burnout relationship. Health Psychol. Rep. 2020, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koh, M.Y.H.; Khoo, H.S.; Gallardo, M.D.; Hum, A. How leaders, teams and organisations can prevent burnout and build resilience: A thematic analysis. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2020, 14, e827–e836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tan, K.-L.; Yeap, P.F. The impact of work engagement and meaningful work to alleviate job burnout among social workers in New Zealand. Manag. Decis. 2022, 60, 3042–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ciarrochi, J.; Deane, F.P.; Anderson, S. Emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between stress and mental health. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2002, 32, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ebrahimi, M.R.; Khoshsima, H.; Zare-Behtash, E. The impacts of enhancing emotional intelligence on the development of reading skill. Int. J. Instr. 2018, 11, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kanesan, P.; Fauzan, N. Models of emotional intelligence: A review. e-BANGI J. 2019, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayer, J.D.; Gaschke, Y.N. The experience and meta-experience of mood. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 55, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mayer, J.D.; Salovey, P.; Gomberg-Kaufman, S.; Blainey, K. A broader conception of mood experience. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1991, 60, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goleman, D. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ; Bantam Books: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  28. Goleman, D. Emotional intelligence: Issues in paradigm building. Emot. Intell. Workplace 2001, 13, 26–44. [Google Scholar]
  29. Angelini, G. Big five model personality traits and job burnout: A systematic literature review. BMC Psychol. 2023, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Listopad, I.W.; Michaelsen, M.M.; Werdecker, L.; Esch, T. Bio-psycho-socio-spirito-cultural factors of burnout: A systematic narrative review of the literature. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 722862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Glenn, M. Preventing Burnout: Controlling Emotions, the Right Way. Master’s Thesis, Lamar University-Beaumont, Beaumont, TX, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  32. Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B.; Nachreiner, F.; Schaufeli, W.B. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Di Gesto, C.; Policardo, G.R.; Bocci Benucci, S.; Çela, E.; Grano, C. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Stress in Intensive Care Unit Nurses During COVID-19: Exploring the Mediating Role of Psychological Inflexibility and the Moderating Effect of Work Experience. Healthcare 2025, 13, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kadadi, S.; Bharamanaikar, S.R. Role of emotional intelligence in healthcare industry. Drishtikon A Manag. J. 2020, 11, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  36. Edú-Valsania, S.; Laguía, A.; Moriano, J.A. Burnout: A review of theory and measurement. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bru-Luna, L.M.; Martí-Vilar, M.; Merino-Soto, C.; Cervera-Santiago, J.L. Emotional intelligence measures: A systematic review. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cao, Y.; Gao, L.; Fan, L.; Jiao, M.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y. The influence of emotional intelligence on job burnout of healthcare workers and mediating role of workplace violence: A cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 892421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, D.; Sambasivan, M.; Kumar, N. Effect of spiritual intelligence, emotional intelligence, psychological ownership and burnout on caring behaviour of nurses: A cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Nurs. 2013, 22, 3192–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lindeman, B.; Petrusa, E.; McKinley, S.; Hashimoto, D.A.; Gee, D.; Smink, D.S.; Phitayakorn, R. Association of burnout with emotional intelligence and personality in surgical residents: Can we predict who is most at risk? J. Surg. Educ. 2017, 74, e22–e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cofer, K.D.; Hollis, R.H.; Goss, L.; Morris, M.S.; Porterfield, J.R.; Chu, D.I. Burnout is associated with emotional intelligence but not traditional job performance measurements in surgical residents. J. Surg. Educ. 2018, 75, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ünal, Z. The contribution of emotional intelligence on the components of burnout: The case of health care sector professionals. Electron. J. Bus. Ethics Organ. Stud. 2014, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  43. Molero Jurado, M.D.M.; Pérez-Fuentes, M.D.C.; Gázquez Linares, J.J.; Simón Márquez, M.D.M.; Martos Martínez, Á. Burnout risk and protection factors in certified nursing aides. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Almeneessier, A.S.; Azer, S.A. Exploring the relationship between burnout and emotional intelligence among academics and clinicians at King Saud University. BMC Med. Educ. 2023, 23, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kasemy, Z.A.; Sharif, A.F.; Bahgat, N.M.; Abdelsattar, S.; Latif, A.A.A. Emotional intelligence, workplace conflict and job burn-out among critical care physicians: A mediation analysis with a cross-sectional study design in Egypt. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e074645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Năstasă, L.E.; Fărcaş, A.D. The effect of emotional intelligence on burnout in healthcare professionals. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 187, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pérez-Fuentes, M.D.C.; Molero Jurado, M.D.M.; Martos Martínez, Á.; Gázquez Linares, J.J. Analysis of the risk and protective roles of work-related and individual variables in burnout syndrome in nurses. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Satterfield, J.; Swenson, S.; Rabow, M. Emotional intelligence in internal medicine residents: Educational implications for clinical performance and burnout. Ann. Behav. Sci. Med. Educ. 2009, 14, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  49. Soto-Rubio, A.; Giménez-Espert, M.D.C.; Prado-Gascó, V. Effect of emotional intelligence and psychosocial risks on burnout, job satisfaction, and nurses’ health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gleason, F.; Baker, S.J.; Wood, T.; Wood, L.; Hollis, R.H.; Chu, D.I.; Lindeman, B. Emotional intelligence and burnout in surgical residents: A 5-year study. J. Surg. Educ. 2020, 77, e63–e70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaul, I.; Reddy, K.J. Relationship of Emotional Intelligence and Burnout among MBBS Doctors of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Psychol. Sci. 2022, 15, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vlachou, E.M.; Damigos, D.; Lyrakos, G.; Chanopoulos, K.; Kosmidis, G.; Karavis, M. The relationship between burnout syndrome and emotional intelligence in healthcare professionals. Health Sci. J. 2016, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  53. Arnone, R.; Cascio, M.I.; Parenti, I. The role of Emotional Intelligence in health care professionals burnout. Eur. J. Public Health 2019, 29, 186–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Görgens-Ekermans, G.; Brand, T. Emotional intelligence as a moderator in the stress-burnout relationship: A questionnaire study on nurses. J. Clin. Nurs. 2012, 21, 2275–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Szczygiel, D.D.; Mikolajczak, M. Emotional intelligence buffers the effects of negative emotions on job burnout in nursing. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tiwari, S.; Bhagat, D. The role of emotional intelligence on health care professionals occupational stress and burnout. Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev. 2020, 12, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Samaei, S.E.; Khosravi, Y.; Heravizadeh, O.; Ahangar, H.G.; Pourshariati, F.; Amrollahi, M. The effect of emotional intelligence and job stress on burnout: A structural equation model among hospital nurses. Int. J. Occup. Hyg. 2017, 9, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  58. Beierle, S.P.; Kirkpatrick, B.A.; Heidel, R.E.; Russ, A.; Ramshaw, B.; McCallum, R.S.; Lewis, J.M. Evaluating and exploring variations in surgical resident emotional intelligence and burnout. J. Surg. Educ. 2019, 76, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yu, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, A.; Wan, H. The mediating role of emotion management, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence in clinical nurses related to negative psychology and burnout. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2023, 16, 3333–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Swami, M.K.; Mathur, D.M.; Pushp, B.K. Emotional intelligence, perceived stress and burnout among resident doctors: An assessment of the relationship. Natl. Med. J. India 2013, 26, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Weng, H.C.; Hung, C.M.; Liu, Y.T.; Cheng, Y.J.; Yen, C.Y.; Chang, C.C.; Huang, C.K. Associations between emotional intelligence and doctor burnout, job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Med. Educ. 2011, 45, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mitra, S.; Sarkar, A.P.; Haldar, D.; Saren, A.B.; Lo, S.; Sarkar, G.N. Correlation among perceived stress, emotional intelligence, and burnout of resident doctors in a medical college of West Bengal: A mediation analysis. Indian J. Public Health 2018, 62, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jahanzeb, Z.; Parveen, S.; Khizar, U. Self-control as mediator between emotional intelligence and burnout among doctors. J. Posit. Sch. Psychol. 2023, 7, 388–400. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bin Dahmash, A.; Alhadlaq, A.S.; Alhujayri, A.K.; Alkholaiwi, F.; Alosaimi, N.A. Emotional Intelligence and Burnout in Plastic Surgery Residents: Is There a Relationship? Plast. Reconstr. Surgery. Glob. Open 2019, 7, e2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kirkpatrick, H.; Wasfie, T.; Laykova, A.; Barber, K.; Hella, J.; Vogel, M. Emotional intelligence, burnout, and wellbeing among residents as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. Surg. 2022, 88, 1856–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wasfie, T.; Kirkpatrick, H.; Barber, K.; Hella, J.R.; Anderson, T.; Vogel, M. Burnout and well-being of medical and surgical residents in relation to emotional intelligence: A 3-year study. Surgery 2024, 175, 856–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sharaf, A.M.; Abdulla, I.H.; Alnatheer, A.M.; Alahmari, A.N.; Alwhibi, O.A.; Alabduljabbar, Z.; Alkholaiwi, F.M. Emotional intelligence and burnout among otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 851408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wasfie, T.; Kirkpatrick, H.; Barber, K.; Hella, J.R.; Anderson, T.; Vogel, M. Longitudinal study of emotional intelligence, well-being, and burnout of surgical and medical residents. Am. Surg. 2023, 89, 3077–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dawkins, S.; Tian, A.W.; Newman, A.; Martin, A. Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. J. Organ. Behav. 2017, 38, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Reshetnikov, A.; Abaeva, O.; Prisyazhnaya, N.; Romanova, T.; Romanov, S.; Sobolev, K.; Manukyan, A. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Burnout Levels among Healthcare Workers: A Comparative Analysis of the Pandemic Period and Post-Pandemic Period. Heliyon 2024, 10, e36769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maslach, C.; Leiter, M.P. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry 2016, 15, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. World Health Organization (WHO). Burn-Out an "Occupational Phenomenon": International Classification of Diseases; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases (accessed on 1 July 2025).
  73. Goldberg, D.G.; Soylu, T.; Hoffman, C.F.; Kishton, R.E.; Cronholm, P.F. "Anxiety, COVID, Burnout and Now Depression": A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians’ Perceptions of Burnout. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2024, 39, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Purvanova, R.K.; Muros, J.P. Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010, 77, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mahalik, J.R.; Di Bianca, M. Help-Seeking for Depression as a Stigmatized Threat to Masculinity. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 2021, 52, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wong, Y.J.; Ho, M.-H.R.; Wang, S.-Y.; Miller, I.S.K. Meta-Analyses of the Relationship between Conformity to Masculine Norms and Mental Health-Related Outcomes. J. Couns. Psychol. 2017, 64, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Brewer, E.W.; Shapard, L. Employee burnout: A meta-analysis of the relationship between age or years of experience. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2004, 3, 102–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gómez-Urquiza, J.L.; Vargas, C.; De la Fuente, E.I.; Fernández-Castillo, R.; Cañadas-De la Fuente, G.A. Age as a risk factor for burnout syndrome in nursing professionals: A meta-analytic study. Res. Nurs. Health 2017, 40, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. van Zyl, L.; van der Vaart, L.; Stemmet, L. Positive Psychological Interventions Aimed at Enhancing Psychological Ownership. In Theoretical Orientations and Practical Applications of Psychological Ownership; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 119–134. [Google Scholar]
  80. O’Connor, K.; Muller Neff, D.; Pitman, S. Burnout in mental health professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and determinants. Eur. Psychiatry J. Assoc. Eur. Psychiatr. 2018, 53, 74–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alarcon, G.; Eschleman, K.J.; Bowling, N.A. Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work Stress 2009, 23, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Roberts, B.W.; Luo, J.; Briley, D.A.; Chow, P.I.; Su, R.; Hill, P.L. A Systematic Review of Personality Trait Change Through Intervention. Psychol. Bull. 2017, 143, 117–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Teng, C.-I.; Hsu, W.-H. The Impact of Health Service Provider Agreeableness on Care Quality Variation. Serv. Sci. 2012, 4, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tsai, I.C.; Hsu, C.W.; Chang, C.H.; Tseng, P.T.; Chang, K.V. Effectiveness of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation for Reducing Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 883251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cañadas-De la Fuente, G.A.; Ortega, E.; Ramirez-Baena, L.; De la Fuente-Solana, E.I.; Vargas, C.; Gómez-Urquiza, J.L. Gender, marital status, and children as risk factors for burnout in nurses: A meta-analytic study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Isaksson, U.; Graneheim, U.H.; Richter, J.; Eisemann, M.; Åström, S. Exposure to violence in relation to personality traits, coping abilities, and burnout among caregivers in nursing homes: A case-control study. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2008, 22, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Converso, D.; Sottimano, I.; Balducci, C. Violence exposure and burnout in healthcare sector: Mediating role of work ability. La Med. Del Lav. 2021, 112, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Somani, R.; Muntaner, C.; Hillan, E.; Velonis, A.J.; Smith, P. A Systematic Review: Effectiveness of Interventions to De-escalate Workplace Violence against Nurses in Healthcare Settings. Saf. Health Work 2021, 12, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Phillips, J.P. Workplace Violence against Health Care Workers in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Molino, M.; Cortese, C.G.; Ghislieri, C. The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Siegling, A.B.; Vesely, A.K.; Petrides, K.V.; Saklofske, D.H. Incremental validity of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire-short form (TEIQue-SF). J. Personal. Assess. 2015, 97, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. de Ridder, D.T.; Lensvelt-Mulders, G.; Finkenauer, C.; Stok, F.M.; Baumeister, R.F. Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 16, 76–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mattingly, V.; Kraiger, K. Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2019, 29, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Taylor, M.J.; Andreatta, R.; Woltenberg, L.; Cormier, M.; Hoch, J.M. The relationship of emotional intelligence to burnout and related factors in healthcare profession students. Nurse Educ. Today 2024, 143, 106387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cabello, R.; Sorrel, M.A.; Fernández-Pinto, I.; Extremera, N.; Fernández-Berrocal, P. Age and gender differences in ability emotional intelligence in adults: A cross-sectional study. Dev. Psychol. 2016, 52, 1486–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dhillon, S.K.; Shipley, N.; Jackson, M.; Segrest, S.; Sharma, D.; Chapman, B.P.; Hayslip, B. Emotional intelligence: A comparative study on age and gender differences. Int. J. Basic Appl. Res. 2018, 8, 670–681. [Google Scholar]
  97. Lopez-Zafra, E.; Gartzia, L. Perceptions of gender differences in self-report measures of emotional intelligence. Sex Roles 2014, 70, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fariselli, L.; Ghini, M.; Freeman, J. Age and Emotional Intelligence: White Paper. 2008. Available online: http://www.6seconds.org/sei/media/WP_EQ_and_Age.pdf (accessed on 8 April 2025).
  99. Sanchez-Gomez, M.; Breso, E.; Giorgi, G. Could Emotional Intelligence Ability Predict Salary? A Cross-Sectional Study in a Multioccupational Sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Killgore, W.D.S.; Vanuk, J.R.; Persich, M.R.; Cloonan, S.A.; Grandner, M.A.; Dailey, N.S. Sleep quality and duration are associated with greater trait emotional intelligence. Sleep Health 2022, 8, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sepdanius, E.; Harefa, S.K.; Indika, P.M.; Effendi, H.; Rifki, M.S.; Afriani, R. Relationship between physical activity, stress and sleep quality and emotional intelligence. Int. J. Hum. Mov. Sports Sci. 2023, 11, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Acebes-Sánchez, J.; Diez-Vega, I.; Esteban-Gonzalo, S.; Rodríguez-Romo, G. Physical Activity and Emotional Intelligence among Undergraduate Students: A Correlational Study. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Marisa, D.E.; Dioso, R.; Elengoe, A.; Kamasturyani, Y.; Nurhaeni, A. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) for Healthcare Workers. Int. Res. J. Multidiscip. Scope 2025, 6, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram illustrating study selection process.
Figure 1. Flow diagram illustrating study selection process.
Healthcare 13 02156 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stoian-Bălăşoiu, I.R.; Diaconescu, L.V.; Mihăilescu, A.I.; Stan, S.; Ciobanu, A.M.; Popa-Velea, O. Contributing Factors to Burnout in Healthcare Professionals—Does Emotional Intelligence Play a Protective Role? A Narrative Review. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172156

AMA Style

Stoian-Bălăşoiu IR, Diaconescu LV, Mihăilescu AI, Stan S, Ciobanu AM, Popa-Velea O. Contributing Factors to Burnout in Healthcare Professionals—Does Emotional Intelligence Play a Protective Role? A Narrative Review. Healthcare. 2025; 13(17):2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stoian-Bălăşoiu, Ioana Ruxandra, Liliana Veronica Diaconescu, Alexandra Ioana Mihăilescu, Sabina Stan, Adela Magdalena Ciobanu, and Ovidiu Popa-Velea. 2025. "Contributing Factors to Burnout in Healthcare Professionals—Does Emotional Intelligence Play a Protective Role? A Narrative Review" Healthcare 13, no. 17: 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172156

APA Style

Stoian-Bălăşoiu, I. R., Diaconescu, L. V., Mihăilescu, A. I., Stan, S., Ciobanu, A. M., & Popa-Velea, O. (2025). Contributing Factors to Burnout in Healthcare Professionals—Does Emotional Intelligence Play a Protective Role? A Narrative Review. Healthcare, 13(17), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172156

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop