Harnessing Digital Phenotyping for Early Self-Detection of Psychological Distress
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Methodology
- Scoping Review: We conducted a preliminary scoping review of recent literature on digital phenotyping and psychological distress. This exploratory approach helped us identify key behavioral markers and data streams, such as screen time, location, and social interaction, commonly associated with mental health outcomes. Insights from this review guided our subsequent system design.
- Designing ESFY: Building on the insights from our review and Melcher et al.’s [1] conceptual framework, we developed ESFY: Expert System for Youth, a prototype system that collects and analyzes smartphone data to detect early signs of psychological distress.
- Evaluating ESFY: We evaluated the ESFY through a mixed-method user study with participants. The study assessed usability, user experience, cognitive load, and the system’s ability to provide meaningful feedback. Feedback and results informed the system’s validation and future improvements.
3.1. Scoping Review Method
- First, we familiarized ourselves with the dataset by thoroughly reading and reviewing the full text and extracted details of each included study, focusing on their use of digital phenotyping modalities and targeted psychological distress types.
- Next, we generated initial codes by systematically categorizing meaningful data excerpts, capturing recurring topics such as sensor type, data stream, mental health outcome, (e.g., anxiety, stress), methodological approach, design recommendations.
- After coding, we identified preliminary themes by grouping related codes into broader categories, such as mobility tracking for depression, social interaction data for loneliness, and multi-sensor integration for stress detection.
- These themes were then reviewed and refined to ensure that they accurately represented the underlying studies and were clearly distinct from one another. Examples of emergent themes included behavioral markers of anxiety, scalability of passive sensing, and gaps in loneliness detection.
- Finally, the refined themes were analyzed in depth and synthesized into a coherent narrative, highlighting the key findings, methodological strengths, and gaps in the digital phenotyping literature for psychological distress. This structured approach ensured that the review provided a comprehensive, evidence-based map of the field while also identifying directions for future research and system development.
Paper | Study Type | Phenotypes Studied | Main Contribution |
---|---|---|---|
Hamilton et al. [37] | Empirical study | App usage, screen activity, accelerometer, communication | Tested the feasibility and acceptability of using smartphone-based mobile sensing (via AWARE app) to objectively track social media use among adolescents and proposed methods to improve digital phenotyping accuracy for mental health insights. In this study, they focused on depression, mood, and emotions. |
Fransson et al. [38] | Empirical study | GPS, app usage, self-reported mental health surveys, voice diaries | This study combined passive smartphone data (GPS/mobility) and active self-reports from pregnant women during COVID-19 to track mental health changes. It found that reduced mobility and increased internet searches were linked to worse mental health, highlighting digital phenotyping’s value for real-time monitoring during crises. In this study, they focused on depression and anxiety. |
Williams et al. [39] | Review | GPS, accelerometer, app usage, keystroke patterns, voice, camera | Digital phenotyping for mental health should be understood in relation to its environmental, spatial, and technological contexts, highlighting the need to consider how sensors, data, and environments interact. In this review study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Choi et al. [40] | Review | GPS, microphone, accelerometer, call logs, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, keyboard, SMS, emails, app usage, Gyroscope | This study explored the potential of smartphone sensors to detect behavioral patterns linked to stress, anxiety, and mild depression among nonclinical populations. The findings from the reviewed studies support the effectiveness of smartphone sensors in recognizing behaviors associated with these psychological conditions. In this review study, they focused on stress, anxiety, and mild depression. |
Jacobson et al. [41] | Empirical study | Accelerometer, call logs, SMS | Demonstrated that smartphone sensor data can predict social anxiety severity using machine learning, with strong discriminant validity. In this study, they focused on social anxiety. |
Jacobson et al. [42] | Empirical study | Wearable accelerometer | Demonstrated that wearable movement data can accurately predict GAD symptom severity using machine learning, with strong specificity and symptom associations. In this study, they focused on generalized anxiety disorder. |
Cohen et al. [3] | Empirical study | Geolocation, accelerometer, screen state, active survey responses | Demonstrated that combined active and passive smartphone data can predict significant mood and anxiety symptom changes across users, supporting the feasibility of scalable symptom monitoring. In this study, they focused on mood and anxiety. |
Zhang et al. [4] | Empirical study | physical activity, heart rate, sleep patterns | Used wearable data and machine learning to identify behavioral markers of depression and anxiety, showing the feasibility of large-scale mental health screening using digital phenotyping. In this study, they focused on depression and anxiety. |
Nguyen et al. [43] | Empirical study | Pseudo-passive data, GPS, accelerometer | Applied machine learning to classify anxiety severity using survey-derived features during COVID-19 and introduced pseudo-passive features as a proxy for digital phenotyping. In this study, they focused on anxiety. |
Kang et al. [44] | Study protocol | App usage, smartphone activity logs, wearable data | Introduced a hybrid research model combining centralized (clinical + app data) and decentralized (app-only) data collection methods to gather digital phenotyping data for mood and anxiety assessment at scale. In this study, they focused on mood and anxiety. |
Egger et al. [45] | Empirical study | GPS, accelerometer, screen state, call logs, app usage | Proposed a framework to assess real-time stress and stress responses using passive smartphone data and digital phenotyping methods to enhance detection and early intervention in mental health. In this study, they focused on stress. |
Shvetcov et al. [46] | Empirical study | GPS, accelerometer, app usage | Developed and validated a machine learning pipeline to predict stress levels in university students using passive smartphone sensing data. In this study, they focused on stress. |
Melcher et al. [1] | Review | GPS, Accelerometer, social interaction data, app usage | Reviewed 25 digital phenotyping studies involving college students; highlighted the use of mobile sensing to monitor behaviors like sleep, social interaction, and exercise and emphasized the potential of these data streams for remote mental health assessment and personalized care. In this review study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Mendes et al. [23] | Review | GPS, Accelerometer, Light sensor, Ambient data, App usage, Screen activity | Reviewed 31 sensing apps and 8 public datasets for digital phenotyping in mental health; highlighted key sensing modalities, gaps in dataset availability, and challenges in translating digital biomarkers into clinically actionable tools. In this review study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Oudin et al. [47] | Perspective | GPS, smartphone interactions, and behavioral patterns | Discusses the conceptual and ethical implications of digital phenotyping in psychiatry, advocating for its integration into patient-centered care while cautioning against the depersonalization of therapeutic relationships. In this study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Currey et al. [48] | Empirical study | GPS, call logs, sleep duration, screen state | Evaluated correlations between passive smartphone data and mental health survey scores in a large sample using the mindLAMP app. Found weaker correlations than smaller studies and highlighted the improved predictive value when passive data is combined with daily self-reports. In this study, they focused on stress, generalized anxiety disorder, loneliness, sleep quality, psychosis, depression and anxiety. |
Currey et al. [49] | Empirical study | GPS, screen time, phone unlocks, app usage, sleep estimates | Validated a digital phenotyping model for predicting symptom improvement and guiding personalized interventions among college students, demonstrating its feasibility and engagement potential. In this study, they focused on stress, generalized anxiety disorder, loneliness, sleep quality, psychosis, depression and anxiety. |
Birk et al. [50] | Review | Passive data, wearables, social media activity, behavioral tracking, sensor data | The paper critically examines digital phenotyping in mental health, highlighting ethical and conceptual challenges such as algorithmic bias, reductionism, and the need for greater reflexivity and social science involvement. In this study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Adam, David [51] | Perspective | GPS, call logs, messaging frequency, battery usage, sleep patterns | Provides a synthesis of current efforts and challenges in using smartphone-derived digital phenotyping for mental health care, including its potential to predict relapse and symptom changes, while highlighting issues of privacy, platform fragmentation, and lack of large-scale validation. In this study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Langholm et al. [52] | Empirical study | Phone usage, message usage, device usage, visits (location), Ambient light | Demonstrated the feasibility of using Apple’s SensorKit framework to expand the range and quality of digital phenotyping data in mental health research, highlighting the improved granularity and potential clinical relevance of these new data streams. In this study, they focused on depression. |
Cosgrove et al. [53] | Perspective | Tracking sensors | Critiques the ethical and human rights implications of digital phenotyping and sensor-embedded psychotropic drugs, warning that such technologies may reinforce coercion and compromise autonomy in mental health care. In this study, they focused on mood. |
Moura et al. [54] | Review | GPS, accelerometer, app usage, sleep data, physical activity, mobility patterns | Reviewed 59 studies involving multimodal sensing for digital phenotyping of mental health. Highlighted the evolution, applications, and methodological challenges in using digital biomarkers for real-world clinical decision support. In this review study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Cohen et al. [55] | Empirical study | Sleep duration patterns, digital activity | Demonstrated that smartphone-based digital phenotyping and mobile cognitive tasks show promising validity and cross-cultural applicability in assessing cognition and related behaviors among individuals with schizophrenia. In this study, they focused on schizophrenia. |
Jilka et al. [56] | Perspective | GPS, accelerometer, app usage, and wearables as general sources of behavioral and physiological data | Advocates for broader adoption of digital phenotyping in mental health care; highlights its potential to improve ecological validity of assessments, enhance patient monitoring, and support real-world, data-driven interventions. In this study, they focused on mental health in general. |
Lakhtakia et al. [57] | Empirical study | App usage, smartphone surveys, cognitive assessment games | Evaluated feasibility and acceptability of using smartphone digital phenotyping and cognitive tasks for monitoring symptoms in first-episode psychosis across India and the USA, demonstrating good engagement and preliminary clinical correlations. In this study, they focused on schizophrenia. |
Song et al. [58] | Empirical study | Heart rate variability, sleep quality, physical activity | Demonstrated that wearable-derived sleep and activity data can predict daily depressive symptoms among vulnerable older adults, and showed preliminary benefits of individualized health feedback to users and caregivers. In this study, they focused on depression. |
Currey et al. [59] | Empirical study | GPS, accelerometer, screen state, app usage | Demonstrated that digital phenotyping-based models predicting symptom improvement in students can generalize across two independent cohorts, supporting the external validity of sensor-derived behavioral features for mental health monitoring. In this study, they focused on stress, generalized anxiety disorder, loneliness, sleep quality, psychosis, depression, and anxiety. |
Akbarialiabad et al. [60] | Perspective | GPS, accelerometer, social media, screen lock/unlock, call logs, camera, app usage, browser history, light sensor, sleep cycle, exercise, social interactions, heart rate | The commentary highlights the mental health risks and ethical challenges associated with the unregulated use of digital phenotyping and neuromarketing, particularly in vulnerable and low-resource populations. The authors call for greater regulation, transparency and the development of privacy-preserving technologies to safeguard mental health and personal autonomy. In this study, they focused on mental health in general. |
3.2. Method of Designing ESFY
3.2.1. Daily Prognosis and Insights Hub
3.2.2. Multi-Device Integration Panel
3.2.3. Proactive Notifications and Feedback
3.2.4. External Healthcare Interventions
3.2.5. Health Stats Overview
3.2.6. Weekly Insights Analytics
3.2.7. Automated Weekly Summary and Actionable Insights
3.2.8. ESFY Expert Conversational Interface
3.3. User Study Method
3.3.1. Study Procedure and Design
- Completion of Prototype Tasks: Participants were asked to complete a predefined set of tasks that simulated typical interactions with the ESFY system. These tasks were designed to reflect real-world use cases, such as onboarding, reviewing personalized mental health feedback, and interacting with behavioral insights generated by the system. As participants navigated through each task, they moved sequentially from one screen to another, making choices and utilizing the app’s core features to achieve specific goals. Throughout the study, multiple usability and performance metrics were systematically recorded, including the average duration spent on each task, average misclick rate, and task drop-off rates. We also tracked the number of participants who completed each mission by following the expected path (direct success) versus those who achieved completion through alternative navigation paths. Additionally, we computed the average success rate across all tasks and measured the average time each participant required to complete a given mission.
- Follow-Up Questionnaires: To complement these quantitative metrics, participants were prompted with open-ended questions at the conclusion of their interactions, allowing them to provide qualitative feedback on their experiences, challenges, and suggestions for improvement.
- NASA TLX Survey: To assess cognitive workload, participants completed the NASA TLX [64], which measures mental demand, effort, frustration, and other usability factors when interacting with the ESFY.
3.3.2. Participants
4. Results
4.1. Scoping Review Results: Psychological Distress
4.1.1. Stress
4.1.2. Anxiety
4.1.3. Loneliness
4.1.4. Depression
4.1.5. Other Psychological Distress Types
4.1.6. Summary
4.2. Scoping Review Results: Digital Phenotyping
4.2.1. GPS/Geolocation
4.2.2. Accelerometer
4.2.3. App Usage
4.2.4. Screen Activity
4.2.5. Call Logs
4.2.6. SMS and Email
4.2.7. Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and Proximity Sensing
4.2.8. Light Sensor and Microphone
4.2.9. Physical Activity, Heart Rate, and Sleep Patterns
4.2.10. Self-Reported Data
4.2.11. Summary
4.3. User Study Results
4.3.1. Cognitive Workload
4.3.2. Usability and Aesthetics
4.3.3. Clarity and Perceived Value
4.3.4. Integration with Healthcare
4.3.5. Accuracy and Reliability
4.3.6. Privacy and Transparency
4.3.7. Suggestions for Future Features
5. Discussion
5.1. Privacy and User Control
5.2. Integration with Healthcare Ecosystems
5.3. Personalization and Inclusivity
5.4. Limitations and Future Work
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Melcher, J.; Hays, R.; Torous, J. Digital phenotyping for mental health of college students: A clinical review. BMJ Ment. Health 2020, 23, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinan, I.I.; Degila, J.; Nwaocha, V.; Onashoga, S.A. Data Architectures’ Evolution and Protection. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Prague, Czech Republic, 20–22 July 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, A.; Naslund, J.; Lane, E.; Bhan, A.; Rozatkar, A.; Mehta, U.M.; Vaidyam, A.; Byun, A.; Barnett, I.; Torous, J. Digital phenotyping data and anomaly detection methods to assess changes in mood and anxiety symptoms across a transdiagnostic clinical sample. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2025, 151, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Stewart, C.; Ranjan, Y.; Conde, P.; Sankesara, H.; Rashid, Z.; Sun, S.; Dobson, R.J.; Folarin, A.A. Large-scale digital phenotyping: Identifying depression and anxiety indicators in a general UK population with over 10,000 participants. J. Affect. Disord. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanova, A.; Gorbaniuk, O.; Błachnio, A.; Przepiórka, A.; Mraka, N.; Polishchuk, V.; Gorbaniuk, J. Mobile phone addiction, phubbing, and depression among men and women: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychiatr. Q. 2020, 91, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharthi, S.A. Bridging the Digital Divide in Health for Older Adults: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study of mHealth in Saudi Arabia. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 63757–63773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coyne, S.M.; Stockdale, L.; Summers, K. Problematic cell phone use, depression, anxiety, and self-regulation: Evidence from a three year longitudinal study from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 96, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noë, B.; Turner, L.D.; Linden, D.E.; Allen, S.M.; Winkens, B.; Whitaker, R.M. Identifying Indicators of Smartphone Addiction Through User-App Interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 99, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, D.J.; Im, S.K.; Kim, M.S. Identification of Video Game Addiction Using Heart-Rate Variability Parameters. Sensors 2021, 21, 4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kostopoulos, P.; Kyritsis, A.I.; Deriaz, M.; Konstantas, D. Stress detection using smart phone data. In Proceedings of the eHealth 360°: International Summit on eHealth, Budapest, Hungary, 14–16 June 2016; Revised Selected Papers. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 340–351. [Google Scholar]
- Winslow, B.D.; Kwasinski, R.; Hullfish, J.; Ruble, M.; Lynch, A.; Rogers, T.; Nofziger, D.; Brim, W.; Woodworth, C. Automated stress detection using mobile application and wearable sensors improves symptoms of mental health disorders in military personnel. Front. Digit. Health 2022, 4, 919626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Limone, P.; Toto, G.A. Psychological and emotional effects of Digital Technology on Children in COVID-19 Pandemic. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, L.; Gu, J.; Shao, F.; Liang, X.; Yue, L.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, L. Application and preliminary outcomes of remote diagnosis and treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak: Retrospective cohort study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2020, 8, e19417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Bouey, J. Public mental health crisis during COVID-19 pandemic, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Cuadrado, T.; Ortiz, C.; Ayuso-Álvarez, A.; Galan, I. Impact of psychological distress on mortality in Spain. The importance of early detection and treatment of mental disorders. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2024, 169, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torous, J.; Kiang, M.V.; Lorme, J.; Onnela, J.P. New tools for new research in psychiatry: A scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment. Health 2016, 3, e5165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onnela, J.P. Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data. Neuropsychopharmacology 2021, 46, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Insel, T.R. Digital phenotyping: Technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA 2017, 318, 1215–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Martin, N.; Insel, T.R.; Dagum, P.; Greely, H.T.; Cho, M.K. Data mining for health: Staking out the ethical territory of digital phenotyping. NPJ Digit. Med. 2018, 1, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandelow, B.; Michaelis, S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2015, 17, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Institutes of Health (NIH). Any Anxiety Disorder. 2020. Available online: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/any-anxiety-disorder (accessed on 13 May 2025).
- Alharthi, S.A. mHealth Applications in Saudi Arabia: Current Features and Future Opportunities. Healthcare 2025, 13, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mendes, J.P.; Moura, I.R.; Van de Ven, P.; Viana, D.; Silva, F.J.; Coutinho, L.R.; Teixeira, S.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Teles, A.S. Sensing apps and public data sets for digital phenotyping of mental health: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e28735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naslund, J.A.; Aschbrenner, K.A.; Araya, R.; Marsch, L.A.; Unützer, J.; Patel, V.; Bartels, S.J. Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries: A narrative review of the literature. Lancet Psychiatry 2017, 4, 486–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.H.; Powers, B.W.; Hawkins, J.B.; Brownstein, J.S. The digital phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 462–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bufano, P.; Laurino, M.; Said, S.; Tognetti, A.; Menicucci, D. Digital phenotyping for monitoring mental disorders: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e46778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onnela, J.P.; Rauch, S.L. Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 1691–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torous, J.; Wisniewski, H.; Bird, B.; Carpenter, E.; David, G.; Elejalde, E.; Fulford, D.; Guimond, S.; Hays, R.; Henson, P.; et al. Creating a digital health smartphone app and digital phenotyping platform for mental health and diverse healthcare needs: An interdisciplinary and collaborative approach. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 2019, 4, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshe, I.; Terhorst, Y.; Philippi, P.; Domhardt, M.; Cuijpers, P.; Cristea, I.; Pulkki-Råback, L.; Baumeister, H.; Sander, L.B. Digital interventions for the treatment of depression: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 2021, 147, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Norman, D.A.; Draper, S.W. User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction; L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Thematic Analysis; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Haddaway, N.R.; Collins, A.M.; Coughlin, D.; Kirk, S. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS ONE 2015, 10, e0138237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gusenbauer, M.; Haddaway, N.R. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods 2020, 11, 181–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Martín, A.; Thelwall, M.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Delgado López-Cózar, E. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics 2021, 126, 871–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharthi, S.A.; Alsaedi, O.; Toups, P.O.; Tanenbaum, T.J.; Hammer, J. Playing to Wait: A Taxonomy of Idle Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’18, New York, NY, USA, 21–26 April2018; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, J.L.; Dreier, M.J.; Caproni, B.; Fedor, J.; Durica, K.C.; Low, C.A. Improving the Science of Adolescent Social Media and Mental Health: Challenges and Opportunities of Smartphone-Based Mobile Sensing and Digital Phenotyping. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 2025, 10, 301–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fransson, E.; Karalexi, M.; Kimmel, M.; Bränn, E.; Kollia, N.; Tas, A.; van Zoest, V.; Nordling, E.; Skalkidou, A.; Papadopoulos, F.C. Differentiated mental health patterns in pregnancy during COVID-19 first two waves in Sweden: A mixed methods study using digital phenotyping. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Williams, J.; Pykett, J. Techno-Geographies of Digital Phenotyping in Mental Health Research. 2022. Available online: https://somatosphere.com/2022/techno-geographies-digital-phenotyping-mental-health-williams-pykett.html/ (accessed on 13 May 2025).
- Choi, A.; Ooi, A.; Lottridge, D. Digital phenotyping for stress, anxiety, and mild depression: Systematic literature review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2024, 12, e40689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, N.C.; Summers, B.; Wilhelm, S. Digital biomarkers of social anxiety severity: Digital phenotyping using passive smartphone sensors. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e16875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, N.C.; Feng, B. Digital phenotyping of generalized anxiety disorder: Using artificial intelligence to accurately predict symptom severity using wearable sensors in daily life. Transl. Psychiatry 2022, 12, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, B.; Ivanov, M.; Bhat, V.; Krishnan, S. Digital phenotyping for classification of anxiety severity during COVID-19. Front. Digit. Health 2022, 4, 877762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.W.; Sun, T.H.; Kim, G.Y.; Jung, H.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.; Park, Y.R.; Tu, J.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, K.Y.; et al. Design and methods of a prospective smartphone app-based study for digital phenotyping of mood and anxiety symptoms mixed with centralized and decentralized research form: The search your mind (SYM, 心) project. Psychiatry Investig. 2022, 19, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egger, S.T.; Knorr, M.; Bobes, J.; Bernstein, A.; Seifritz, E.; Vetter, S. Real-time assessment of stress and stress response using digital phenotyping: A study protocol. Front. Digit. Health 2020, 2, 544418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shvetcov, A.; Funke Kupper, J.; Zheng, W.Y.; Slade, A.; Han, J.; Whitton, A.; Spoelma, M.; Hoon, L.; Mouzakis, K.; Vasa, R.; et al. Passive sensing data predicts stress in university students: A supervised machine learning method for digital phenotyping. Front. Psychiatry 2024, 15, 1422027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oudin, A.; Maatoug, R.; Bourla, A.; Ferreri, F.; Bonnot, O.; Millet, B.; Schoeller, F.; Mouchabac, S.; Adrien, V. Digital phenotyping: Data-driven psychiatry to redefine mental health. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e44502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Currey, D.; Torous, J. Digital phenotyping correlations in larger mental health samples: Analysis and replication. BJPsych Open 2022, 8, e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Currey, D.; Torous, J. Digital phenotyping data to predict symptom improvement and mental health app personalization in college students: Prospective validation of a predictive model. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e39258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birk, R.H.; Samuel, G. Can digital data diagnose mental health problems? A sociological exploration of ‘digital phenotyping’. Sociol. Health Illn. 2020, 42, 1873–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, D. Digital phenotyping using smartphones could help steer mental health treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2505700122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langholm, C.; Kowatsch, T.; Bucci, S.; Cipriani, A.; Torous, J. Exploring the potential of apple SensorKit and digital phenotyping data as new digital biomarkers for mental health research. Digit. Biomark. 2023, 7, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosgrove, L.; Karter, J.M.; McGinley, M.; Morrill, Z. Digital phenotyping and digital psychotropic drugs: Mental health surveillance tools that threaten human rights. Health Hum. Rights 2020, 22, 33. [Google Scholar]
- Moura, I.; Teles, A.; Viana, D.; Marques, J.; Coutinho, L.; Silva, F. Digital phenotyping of mental health using multimodal sensing of multiple situations of interest: A systematic literature review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2023, 138, 104278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, A.; Joshi, D.; Bondre, A.; Chand, P.K.; Chaturvedi, N.; Choudhary, S.; Dutt, S.; Khan, A.; Langholm, C.; Kumar, M.; et al. Digital phenotyping correlates of mobile cognitive measures in schizophrenia: A multisite global mental health feasibility trial. PLoS Digit. Health 2024, 3, e0000526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jilka, S.; Giacco, D. Digital phenotyping: How it could change mental health care and why we should all keep up. J. Ment. Health 2024, 33, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lakhtakia, T.; Bondre, A.; Chand, P.K.; Chaturvedi, N.; Choudhary, S.; Currey, D.; Dutt, S.; Khan, A.; Kumar, M.; Gupta, S.; et al. Smartphone digital phenotyping, surveys, and cognitive assessments for global mental health: Initial data and clinical correlations from an international first episode psychosis study. Digit. Health 2022, 8, 20552076221133758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, S.; Seo, Y.; Hwang, S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J. Digital phenotyping of geriatric Depression using a Community-Based Digital Mental Health Monitoring Platform for socially vulnerable older adults and their community caregivers: 6-Week living lab single-arm pilot study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2024, 12, e55842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Currey, D.; Hays, R.; Torous, J. Digital phenotyping models of symptom improvement in college mental health: Generalizability across two cohorts. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 2023, 8, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbarialiabad, H.; Bastani, B.; Taghrir, M.H.; Paydar, S.; Ghahramani, N.; Kumar, M. Threats to global mental health from unregulated digital Phenotyping and Neuromarketing: Recommendations for COVID-19 era and beyond. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 713987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulavani, S.; Kulkarni, R. A review of knowledge based systems in medical diagnosis. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Knowl. Manag. 2009, 2, 269–275. [Google Scholar]
- Lucas, G.M.; Gratch, J.; King, A.; Morency, L.P. It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput. Human Behav. 2014, 37, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Miranda, J.; Martínez, A.; Ramos, R.; Aguilar, H.; Jiménez, L.; Arias, H.; Rosales, G.; Valencia, E. Assessment of users’ acceptability of a mobile-based embodied conversational agent for the prevention and detection of suicidal behaviour. J. Med. Syst. 2019, 43, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hart, S.G. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 16–20 October 2006; Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2006; Volume 50, pp. 904–908. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zakai, J.G.; Alharthi, S.A. Harnessing Digital Phenotyping for Early Self-Detection of Psychological Distress. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13162008
Zakai JG, Alharthi SA. Harnessing Digital Phenotyping for Early Self-Detection of Psychological Distress. Healthcare. 2025; 13(16):2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13162008
Chicago/Turabian StyleZakai, Jana G., and Sultan A. Alharthi. 2025. "Harnessing Digital Phenotyping for Early Self-Detection of Psychological Distress" Healthcare 13, no. 16: 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13162008
APA StyleZakai, J. G., & Alharthi, S. A. (2025). Harnessing Digital Phenotyping for Early Self-Detection of Psychological Distress. Healthcare, 13(16), 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13162008