Next Article in Journal
Hand-Washing Habits in a Sample of Spanish Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Previous Article in Journal
Change in Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer Between 2010 and 2022
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advancing Pharmaceutical Care in Community Pharmacies in Poland: A Blueprint for Enhanced Patient Care Quality

by
Piotr Merks
1,
Anna Kowalczuk
2,
Aleksandra Howell
3,
Artur Białoszewski
4,
Justyna Strocka
5,
Ewa Krajewska
6,
Jarosław Pinkas
5,
Janusz Ostrowski
5,
Anna Staniszewska
7,
Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska
8,
Melania Brzozowska
9,
Anna Augustynowicz
5,10,
Mariola Borowska
11,
Agnieszka Drab
12,
Jolanta Herda
13,
Justyna Kaźmierczak
14 and
Urszula Religioni
5,*
1
Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
2
Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, 00-032 Warsaw, Poland
3
Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
4
Department of the Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
5
School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
6
Main Pharmaceutical Inspectorate, 00-082 Warsaw, Poland
7
Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
8
Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland
9
Drug Reimbursement Department, National Health Fund, 02-528 Warsaw, Poland
10
Department of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland
11
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Primary Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
12
Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics with e-Health Lab, Medical University of Lublin, 20-124 Lublin, Poland
13
Department of Public Health, Medical University of Lublin, 20-124 Lublin, Poland
14
The Polish Pharmacy Practice Research Network (PPPRN), 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(21), 2109; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212109
Submission received: 18 September 2024 / Revised: 11 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 23 October 2024

Abstract

:
Background: This article reviews the current state of pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies in Poland and proposes a collaborative framework for its advancement. While pharmaceutical care has evolved significantly worldwide, with Europe leading the way, Poland has lagged in its development. Although Polish pharmacists are well-qualified and community pharmacies are numerous, pharmaceutical care remains underdeveloped. Methods: We conducted a literature review and analyzed case studies from European countries with advanced pharmaceutical services. Based on these findings, we collaborated with policy makers, commissioners, and academics to develop a framework for enhancing pharmaceutical care in Poland. The plan emphasizes integrating seven key services into Polish community pharmacies. Results: Our proposed framework outlines seven essential pharmaceutical services: medicine use reviews, new medicine services, minor ailment services, repeat prescription services, integrated prevention programs, cardiovascular disease prevention programs, and vaccination programs. Evidence from other European countries suggests that implementing these services could significantly improve health outcomes and patient quality of life. This is particularly important in light of Poland’s ageing population, the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, and the healthcare system’s increasing burden due to polypharmacy. Conclusions: The proposed framework presents a practical and collaborative approach to advancing pharmaceutical care in Poland. By adopting these key services, community pharmacies could play a more integral role in improving patient care quality and alleviating pressure on the broader healthcare system.

1. Introduction

The Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) defines pharmaceutical care as a pharmacist’s contribution to the care of individuals in order to optimize medicine use and improve health outcomes [1]. This entails identifying and solving potential and existing drug-related problems (DRPs), most effectively achieved through close collaboration between patients, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals, predominantly doctors. To address DRPs, comprehensive pharmaceutical care plans integrated into overall patient treatment schemes are essential. Key elements of pharmaceutical care encompass patient counselling on medications and supporting healthcare systems, particularly in the context of prescribing [2].
However, an important actor in this relationship that is often overlooked is the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmaceutical companies play a key role in the development and distribution of medicines, which influences pharmacists’ ability to provide effective care and address DRPs. Their collaboration is essential in ensuring that patients have access to appropriate medications.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) underscores the importance of integrating pharmacists into healthcare teams, emphasizing close collaboration between pharmacists and other healthcare professionals to maximize health outcomes [3,4,5]. In Poland, medicines—both prescription and over-the-counter (OTC)—are sold primarily in pharmacies, with pharmacists acting as gatekeepers. Even OTC drugs require pharmacist oversight, a unique feature of the Polish healthcare system, unlike in many other countries where OTC medications are more freely available without professional involvement.
The European Council, in 2000, highlighted the benefits of pharmaceutical care for patients, recommending its incorporation into national healthcare systems [6]. In recent years, several countries have developed advanced pharmaceutical care plans [7]. Despite the explicit definition of pharmaceutical care in the Pharmaceutical Chambers Act in Poland [8], involving pharmacist collaboration with patients, doctors, and, if necessary, other healthcare professionals, the actual implementation has been notably low. Recognizing this gap, recent initiatives have been planned in Poland to elevate the level of pharmaceutical care and align it with the defined objectives.

2. The Role of Pharmaceutical Care in Healthcare Systems

Community pharmacies, being the most frequently visited healthcare facilities, present a prime opportunity for a diverse array of activities aimed at maximising health outcomes [9,10]. Pharmacists can play a crucial role by offering various services, including designing and implementing therapeutic plans; identifying, explaining, and resolving drug-related problems; organising educational campaigns; and facilitating laboratory and screening tests [11].
These activities are of particular importance in the context of our ageing society, which is witnessing a rise in individuals with chronic diseases and cancers [12,13]. This demographic shift leads to potentially inappropriate polypharmacy, i.e., the administration of multiple medications exceeding medical necessity, requiring vigilant monitoring of prescribed products [14,15,16]. Polypharmacy, understood as situations where patients take five or more medications [14], disproportionately affects the elderly, with nearly 50% of those aged over 65 taking unnecessary medications, often leading to problems such as double therapies and contraindicated combinations [17,18].
Self-medication has become more common in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic, as patients often bypassed healthcare professionals due to limited access to doctors and hospitals [19]. This increase in self-medication has highlighted both the importance of pharmacists as trusted advisors on the safe use of medications and the risks associated with unsupervised use of medications, leading to potential medication-related problems. Trust in pharmacists, doctors, and vaccines has clearly been affected by the pandemic, with mixed results. While pharmacists have gained greater recognition for their role in healthcare, particularly through the administration of vaccines, skepticism about vaccines and medicines has increased in some groups, complicating efforts to improve public health outcomes [20].
Non-adherence to prescribed treatments, affecting approximately 50% of patients, poses another significant challenge [21,22]. The consequences of non-adherence include health deterioration, worsening comorbidities, and, in extreme cases, fatalities [23]. The economic impact is substantial, with an average annual cost per non-adherent patient ranging from USD 949 to 44,190 [21].
Pharmaceutical care serves as an exemplar of integrated services involving diverse medical professions. The WHO emphasizes that pharmaceutical services should be delivered in a manner that ensures patients receive continuous preventive and medical care tailored to their needs across different levels of the healthcare system. Integrated services streamline provision, minimising stages of meetings and separate visits, facilitating effective communication among healthcare staff from different facilities to ensure continuous and high-quality patient care [24].
The implementation of comprehensive pharmaceutical care in healthcare systems promises multiple health benefits, optimising clinical outcomes for patients, alleviating the strain on healthcare systems, and—through proactive identification and resolution of drug-related problems—minimising unnecessary medical visits or hospitalisations, thereby resulting in substantial financial benefits.

3. Pharmaceutical Services in Poland and Worldwide

Pharmaceutical services exhibit notable variations among different countries, with recent years witnessing significant evolution [25]. A study by the Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare highlights that Medicine use reviews are the most prevalent services offered in European pharmacies [26]. Other common services include medication dosing support programmes, medical device usage training, and pharmacist-administered vaccinations, as seen in countries like in Canada, Australia and Great Britain. Some countries offer services related to initial medication dispensing, adherence support, and ongoing medical guidance [26,27]. Additional services may include treating minor ailments and conducting screening tests for early diagnosis (Pharmacy First Service, PFS) [28,29].
In Poland, the sole reimbursement service pertains to the preparation of compound medications. Amendments to the Pharmacist Profession Act will soon permit the continuation of medical instruction by pharmacists. Currently, there are no publicly funded pilot programmes for pharmaceutical care in the country. European nations, on the other hand, implement screening programmes for at-risk patients, covering conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, HIV, hepatitis, colorectal cancer and lipid disorders, along with pharmaceutical consultations for initial medication dispensing [26].
The role of pharmacists in healthcare has been particularly pronounced since the COVID-19 pandemic. With many healthcare facilities closed, pharmacists assumed a crucial role in advising patients on medications, significantly alleviating the strain on primary healthcare. Presently, global efforts are underway to administer COVID-19 vaccinations. A key challenge lies in ensuring widespread access to vaccinations. Countries that have empowered pharmacists to administer other vaccinations, such as the flu vaccine, can leverage this professional group to facilitate COVID-19 vaccinations and enhance accessibility.

4. Arguments for Enhancing Pharmaceutical Care in Poland

The aging demographic trend in Poland, as projected by the Central Statistical Office (GUS), foresees a population exceeding 11 million individuals who are aged over 65 by 2050 [30]. This demographic shift could place significant strain on the public budget, with the latest data indicating that 42% of public health expenditures are directed towards patients aged over 60 [31,32]. With a growing elderly population, these expenditures are poised to increase.
Elderly individuals constitute the predominant group reliant on prescription medications, with Eurostat reporting that 13.8% of Polish seniors receive prescription medications (slightly below the EU average). Notably, 51.8% of seniors in Poland use over-the-counter (OTC) medications, surpassing the European average. Moreover, medication consumption increases with age, necessitating specialised treatment monitoring.
The insufficient number of medical staff, particularly doctors and nurses, represents another compelling argument for the introduction of pharmaceutical care in Poland. In 2018, there were 2.4 doctors per 1000 inhabitants, the lowest ratio among all European Union states, with the highest number of consultations per doctor [33].
Pharmaceutical services offer a viable solution to relieve the burden on the healthcare system. Poland boasts a pharmacy and pharmacist density (36 and 77 per hundred thousand inhabitants, respectively) in line with the European average [34]. The relatively low number of individuals visiting a pharmacy or pharmacy outlet (approximately 2700), suggests untapped potential for more comprehensive patient care [35]. Furthermore, studies carried out in Poland indicate the high level of public trust in pharmacists [36].
These considerations collectively indicate that, given the accessibility of pharmacies and public trust, pharmacists could assume a substantial role in various healthcare activities. This includes repeat prescription service, managing minor ailments, monitoring the efficacy and safety of chronic disease therapies, administering vaccinations and other injections, and conducting screening tests.

5. Policies and Strategic Plans

The Team for Pharmaceutical Care—consisting of representatives of the Ministry of Health, the National Health Fund, the National Pharmacy Chamber and the academic community—collaboratively produced a document entitled “Report. Pharmaceutical Care. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Implementation Process” [37]. This report lays the foundation for the introduction of pharmaceutical care services into the healthcare system in Poland, offering strategic suggestions that can be implemented in the coming years, subject to the necessary legal requirements. This document is instrumental for the effective integration of pharmaceutical care in Poland. The following are the key assumptions outlined in the report.

5.1. Medicine Use Reviews (MURs)

The medicine use review (MUR) is a structured patient interview designed to enhance patient understanding of their medications and optimise pharmacotherapy [38]. This comprehensive review encompasses all medications, including dietary supplements and specific nutritional products. MURs aim to identify potential drug-related problems and interactions while educating patients to improve adherence, leading to enhanced health outcomes [39,40,41,42]. Given the prevalent use of multiple medications, particularly among the elderly, it is recommended that individuals at risk of polypharmacy (simultaneous administration of five or more medications) and those with medical recommendations for reviews (for example, after changing treatments prescribed by doctor) should automatically qualify for MURs.
Several pilot MUR programmes have been conducted in Polish community pharmacies, including OF-Senior [43]. This initiative involved 291 reviews among patients aged ≥ 65 years (mean age 74.9 ± 74.3) with significant polypharmacy of ≥10 pharmaceutical products.
The proposed pilot programme will assess the effectiveness of MURs in community pharmacies and evaluate the service’s utility beyond the programme’s duration. To enable pharmacists’ access to the patients’ list of medications stored in their medical records, the electronic health record MUR module of the Pharmaceutical Care System will be used.

5.2. New Medicine Service (NMS)

Non-adherence to new medications affects nearly 30% of patients within the initial days of treatment [44]. To address this, the New Medicine Service (NMS) has been implemented in pharmaceutical practice in multiple countries [45,46]. Its objective is to support pharmacists to assist patients in taking new medications. Studies show that NMS significantly improves adherence, increases medication safety, optimises health outcomes, and enhances patient involvement in their treatment [45,46].
In Poland, the NMS was included in the pilot programme “Closer to the Patient”, aimed at patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation receiving prescriptions for a new-generation anticoagulant (dabigatran) for the first time [47]. Findings from this study indicate that pharmaceutical interventions in the study group result in significantly improved adherence to pharmacotherapy.
The NMS will comprise three pharmaceutical consultations within the first month of initiating a new medication, with a minimum interval of one week and the option for online consultations. Targeting patients receiving a prescription for a medication used in a chronic disease treatment for the first time, the service aims to educate patients by providing comprehensive information on their medications, offer personalised lifestyle advice, ensure pharmacist supervision over treatment efficacy in the initial weeks, and evaluate treatment tolerance and effectiveness.

5.3. Minor Ailment Service (MAS)

The primary goals of implementing the Minor Ailment Service (MAS) within pharmaceutical care are to increase the access to healthcare and alleviate the strain on healthcare facilities, specifically general practitioner (GP) consultations for minor ailments, where pharmacists can provide valuable assistance. MAS has been successfully introduced to community pharmacies in several countries [48,49,50], resulting in improved doctor availability for other patients and cost savings. In Poland, doctors provided advice on 23 million minor ailments in 2019 [51], a service that pharmacists could potentially handle, thereby optimising resource utilisation. To facilitate this, the Team for Pharmaceutical Care has compiled a list of 162 diagnoses (ICD-10 codes) for minor ailments that pharmacists can effectively address. Establishing clear guidelines and conditions for the treatment of these specific conditions is crucial for enabling pharmacist consultations on minor ailments in community pharmacies in Poland.

5.4. Repeat Prescription Service

The objective of repeat prescriptions is to ensure the uninterrupted continuation of patient treatment. Enabling pharmacists to issue repeat prescriptions simplifies medication purchases for patients and significantly relieves the burden on healthcare facilities. This is of particular significance as visits related to repeat prescriptions constitute approximately 15% of all healthcare facility visits in Poland [52].
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have empowered pharmacists to issue repeat prescriptions. In Poland, however, pharmacists were initially limited to issuing such prescriptions only in life and health-threatening situations, starting in 2020 [53]. The extensive informatisation of healthcare in Poland and the introduction of e-prescriptions provide an opportunity to swiftly alleviate the burden on primary care physicians. At last, pharmacists in Poland will be able to provide repeat prescription service and issue prescriptions for medicinal product refills, nutritional products, and medicinal devices based on medical orders stored in the Medical Information System (MIS). These orders will remain valid for 12 months from issuing, although the initial recommendation proposed a 6-month validity to ensure regular monitoring of patients with chronic conditions (REF) [54].

5.5. Integrated Prevention Programme

Although several preventive screening programs in Poland are publicly funded, the system lacks effective integration and coordination of these initiatives, which limits the ability to compile comprehensive patient health information necessary for ensuring high-quality care. The Integrated Prevention Programme seeks to close this gap by collecting detailed patient health data and engaging at-risk groups in screening tests. This initiative is built around standardized electronic patient surveys tailored to each preventive program, along with a screening qualification questionnaire and the Information System for Prevention Monitoring. A key element of this programme is involving pharmacists in conducting screening and prevention tests. By leveraging their professional role, pharmacists can actively encourage patients to complete the surveys and participate in preventive programmes, such as the cardiovascular disease prevention initiative.

5.6. Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Programme

Cardiovascular diseases account for over 40% of all deaths in Poland [55]. Currently, GPs in Poland are responsible for conducting cardiovascular disease prevention programmes. The Pharmacist Profession Act underscores pharmacists’ participation in health education, promoting healthy lifestyles, and preventive medicine. Given that prevention programmes often involve pharmacotherapy, the involvement of pharmacists in conducting these programmes has been proposed. Drawing from successful experiences in other countries [56,57,58], it is recommended that pharmacists issue referrals for diagnostic tests or even perform some tests within pharmacies.
As part of these cardiovascular disease prevention programs, during a pharmaceutical consultation, pharmacists would interview patients and complete the prevention test report. Patients showing indications of cardiovascular disease would be referred to doctors for further investigations. This collaborative approach, integrating pharmacists into prevention initiatives, aims to enhance accessibility, promote early detection, and contribute to a more comprehensive and proactive approach to cardiovascular health within the healthcare system.

5.7. Vaccinations in Community Pharmacies

In various countries, community pharmacies have successfully incorporated vaccinations as an important component of public health prevention and protection [59,60,61]. Studies show that the implementation of vaccinations in community pharmacies significantly boosts vaccination coverage levels and eases the burden on healthcare facilities [62]. Vaccinations administered by pharmacists in community pharmacies are of particular importance in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Given the notably low vaccination coverage in Poland (for example, in the case of influenza vaccines, coverage is approximately 7%, compared to 70% in Great Britain) [63], introducing vaccinations in community pharmacies can increase their availability and popularity among patients.
Although current Polish law allows only doctors to qualify patients for vaccinations [64], there is a proposal to extend this authority to nurses and pharmacists through a specialised questionnaire. Pharmacies intending to administer vaccinations would need to meet specific requirements, including technical and staff requirements [65]. Pharmacists administering vaccinations would undergo specialised training. To initiate the pilot programme in pharmacies in Poland, influenza vaccinations will be prioritised, aiming to facilitate access and increase vaccination coverage among patients at risk of post-influenza complications. This initiative seeks to minimise visits to healthcare facilities, while offering greater convenience to patients.

5.8. Other Pharmaceutical Care Services

Tailoring pharmaceutical services to the needs of patients in the Polish healthcare system allows for potential expansions. These may include preventative measures against smoking-attributable diseases, provision of syringes and needles, targeted MURs for specific groups of medications (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet medications, diuretics, medications with a narrow therapeutic index), and support for patients with long-term conditions. The latter suggestion was piloted and evaluated in the Pharmaceutical Care in Hypertension (PCH) programme and its continuation, the Pharmaceutical Care in Hypertension and Diabetes (PCHD) programme [66,67,68]. These long-term intervention studies revealed that pharmaceutical care, compared to standard care, improved patient knowledge of their disease and positively impacted hypertension management. Notably, in the PCHD study, pharmacists identified 77 drug-related problems in 30 patients.
Considering the advancing informatisation of healthcare in Poland, pharmacists can also play a role in assisting patients in setting up Internet Patient Accounts (IPAs). These accounts consolidate comprehensive medical records, including e-referrals and e-prescriptions, making them accessible to selected medical professionals. This access is particularly valuable for pharmacists, enabling them to verify information on administered medications.

6. Conclusions

Pharmacotherapy stands as a fundamental component of patient treatment, underscoring the critical role of pharmacists’ knowledge and experience in maximising treatment outcomes and ensuring the highest possible quality of life for patients.
The implications of drug-related problems and non-adherence are profound, impacting health, economy and society. Pharmaceutical services centred on prevention, education, uninterrupted treatment provision, and supporting patients in resolving treatment issues can significantly alleviate the strain on healthcare system. Consequently, pharmaceutical care should emerge as a cornerstone of primary healthcare and a key objective within national health policies.
Efficient provision of pharmaceutical services necessitates the specification of requirements for pharmacies concerning premises, equipment, and staff. It is equally vital to establish essential qualifications for pharmacists offering specific services and ensure comprehensive training in these areas. The development of healthcare funding principles, including provisions for financing from public funds, is of paramount importance in this context.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.K., P.M., A.N.-P. and U.R.; Methodology: A.K., P.M., A.N.-P. and U.R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: A.K., A.N.-P., M.B. (Mariola Borowska), A.A., M.B. (Melania Brzozowska), A.D., J.H., J.K., U.R. and J.S.; Writing—Review and Editing: U.R., A.H., J.S., E.K., J.P., J.O., A.S., M.B. (Mariola Borowska), A.D., J.H., A.A., A.K., E.K., A.B., A.N.-P., M.B. (Melania Brzozowska), J.K. and P.M.; Supervision: P.M., A.N.-P., A.K., U.R. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Allemann, S.S.; van Mil, J.W.; Botermann, L.; Berger, K.; Griese, N.; Hersberger, K.E. Pharmaceutical care: The PCNE definition 2013. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2014, 36, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. van Mil, J.F. Definitions of Pharmaceutical Care and Related Concepts. In The Pharmacist Guide to Implementing Pharmaceutical Care; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO Consultative Group on the Role of the Pharmacist in the Health Care System (3rd: 1997: Vancouver, Canada) & World Health Organization. Division of Drug Management and Policies. The Role of the Pharmacist in the Health Care System: Preparing the Future Pharmacist: Curricular Development: Report of a Third WHO Consultative Group on the Role of the Pharmacist. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/63817/WHO_PHARM_97_599.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 7 June 2024).
  4. World Health Organization. The Role of the Pharmacist in the Health Care System. 1994. Available online: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Jh2995e/ (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  5. Foulon, V.; Wuyts, J.; Liekens, S.; Tsakitzidis, G. The Role of Interprofessional Communication in Pharmaceutical Care. In The Pharmacist Guide to Implementing Pharmaceutical Care; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  6. Resolution on the Implementation of Pharmaceutical Care for the Benefit of Patients and Health Services; Committee of Ministers, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2020; pp. 1–11. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cdf26 (accessed on 7 June 2024).
  7. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Vision and Mission. Available online: https://www.fip.org/vision-mission (accessed on 7 June 2024).
  8. Act of 19 April 1991 on Pharmaceutical Chambers; Chancellery of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland: Warsaw, Poland, 2004; pp. 1–24. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu19910410179 (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  9. Benrimoj, S.I.; Fernandez-Llimos, F. An international series on the integration of community pharmacy in primary health care. Pharm. Pract. 2020, 18, 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Anderson, C. Pharmaceutical care, health promotion, and disease prevention. In The Pharmacist Guide to Implementing Pharmaceutical Care; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 287–293. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shawahna, R. Quality Indicators of Pharmaceutical Care for Integrative Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Indicators Developed Using the Delphi Technique. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 9131850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kennedy, B.K.; Berger, S.L.; Brunet, A.; Campisi, J.; Cuervo, A.M.; Epel, E.S. Geroscience: Linking aging to chronic disease. Cell 2014, 159, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Prince, M.J.; Wu, F.; Guo, Y.; Gutierrez Robledo, L.M.; O’Donnell, M.; Sullivan, R.; Yusuf, S. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet 2015, 385, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. World Health Organization. Medication Safety in Polypharmacy—Technical Report. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/medication-safety-in-polypharmacy-technical-report (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  15. Maher, R.L.; Hanlon, J.; Hajjar, E.R. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2014, 13, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vrettos, I.; Voukelatou, P.; Katsoras, A.; Theotoka, D.; Kalliakmanis, A. Diseases Linked to Polypharmacy in Elderly Patients. Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. Res. 2017, 2017, 4276047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Midão, L.; Giardini, A.; Menditto, E.; Kardas, P.; Costa, E. Polypharmacy prevalence among older adults based on the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2018, 78, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Golchin, N.; Frank, S.H.; Vince, A.; Isham, L.; Meropol, S.B. Polypharmacy in the elderly. J. Res. Pharm. Pract. 2015, 4, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Makowska, M.; Boguszewki, R.; Nowakowski, M.; Podkowińska, M. Self-Medication-Related Behaviors and Poland’s COVID-19 Lockdown. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sobierajski, T.; Rzymski, P.; Wanke-Rytt, M. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Attitudes toward Vaccination: Representative Study of Polish Society. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cutler, R.L.; Fernandez-Llimos, F.; Frommer, M.; Benrimoj, C.; Garcia-Cardenas, V. Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: A systematic review. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e016982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brown, M.T.; Bussell, J.; Dutta, S.; Davis, K.; Strong, S.; Mathew, S. Medication Adherence: Truth and Consequences. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 351, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chisholm-Burns, M.A.; Spivey, C.A. The ‘cost’ of medication nonadherence: Consequences we cannot afford to accept. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2012, 52, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. World Health Organization. Integrated Health Services-What and Why? Technical Brief No.1. 2008. Available online: https://terrance.who.int/mediacentre/data/sage/SAGE_Docs_Ppt_Apr2014/10_session_child_health_services/Apr2014_session10_integrated_health_services.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  25. Costa, F.A.; Scullin, C.; Al-Taani, G.; Hawwa, A.F.; Anderson, C.; Bezverhni, Z.; Binakaj, Z.; Cordina, M.; Foulon, V.; Garcia de Bikuña, B.; et al. Provision of pharmaceutical care by community pharmacists across Europe: Is it developing and spreading? J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2017, 23, 1336–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Institute for Evidence-Based Health. Pharmacy Services in Europe: Evaluating Trends and Value. 2020. Available online: https://www.pgeu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ISBE-EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY_Pharmacy-Services-in-Europe_Evaluating-Trends-and-Value_-20210205.pdf (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  27. Soares, I.B.; Imfeld-Isenegger, T.L.; Makovec, U.N.; Horvat, N.; Kos, M.; Arnet, I.; Hersberger, K.E.; Costa, F.A. A survey to assess the availability, implementation rate and remuneration of pharmacist-led cognitive services throughout Europe. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2020, 16, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. NHS Pharmacy First Service (PFS). Available online: https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/pharmacies-gp-practices-and-appliance-contractors/dispensing-contractors-information/nhs-pharmacy-first-service-pfs (accessed on 18 September 2024).
  29. Yuan, C.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, K.; Huang, Y.; Xi, X. Clinical outcomes of community pharmacy services: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Soc. Care Community 2019, 27, e567–e587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Central Statistical Office. Population Forecast for 2014–2050; Central Statistical Office: Warszawa, Poland, 2014.
  31. Central Statistical Office. The Situation of Older People in Poland in 2018; Central Statistical Office: Warszawa, Poland, 2020.
  32. Eurostat. Youth Unemployment by Sex, Age and Educational Attainment Level. European Health Interview Survey (EHIS). 2018. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/fmahf7dazwixjmp0d1uaaq?locale=en (accessed on 27 August 2024).
  33. OECD/European Union. Health at a Glance: Europe 2020. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-europe-2020_82129230-en (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  34. OECD. Health at a Glance: OECD Indicators. 2019. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  35. Wiśniewski, M.; Religioni, U.; Merks, P. Community Pharmacies in Poland-The Journey from a Deregulated to a Strictly Regulated Market. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Supreme Pharmaceutical Chamber. The Most Important Conclusions of the Report “Pharmacist in Poland. Nationwide Image Study 2019”. Available online: https://www.nia.org.pl/2019/09/16/najwazniejsze-wnioski-raportu-farmaceuta-w-polsce-ogolnopolskie-badanie-wizerunkowe-2019/ (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  37. Supreme Pharmaceutical Chamber. Ministry of Health Presents the Document “Pharmaceutical Care Report. Comprehensive Analysis of the Implementation Process”. Available online: https://www.nia.org.pl/2021/04/06/ministerstwo-zdrowia-przedstawia-dokument-raport-opieka-farmaceutyczna-kompleksowa-analiza-procesu-wdrozenia/ (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  38. Latif, A. Community pharmacy Medicines Use Review: Current challenges. Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2018, 7, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Latif, A.; Boardman, H.F.; Pollock, K. Understanding the patient perspective of the English community pharmacy Medicines Use Review (MUR). Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2013, 9, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Latif, A.; Pollock, K.; Boardman, H.F. Medicines use reviews: A potential resource or lost opportunity for general practice? BMC Fam. Pract. 2013, 14, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Harding, G.; Wilcock, M. Community pharmacists’ perceptions of medicines use reviews and quality assurance by peer review. Pharm. World Sci. 2010, 32, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Walckiers, D.; Van der Heyden, J.; Tafforeau, J. Factors associated with excessive polypharmacy in older people. Arch. Public Health 2015, 73, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Neumann-Podczaska, A. Optimization of pharmacological treatment of the elderly. In Results of the First Pharmaceutical Care Program in Poland in Geriatrics (OF-Senior); Scientific Publishing House of the Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences in Poznań: Poznań, Poland, 2019; pp. 154–196. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fallis, B.A.; Dhalla, I.A.; Klemensberg, J.; Bell, C.M. Primary medication non-adherence after discharge from a general internal medicine service. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stewart, D.; Whittlesea, C.; Dhital, R.; Newbould, L.; McCambridge, J. Community pharmacist led medication reviews in the UK: A scoping review of the medicines use review and the new medicine service literatures. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2020, 16, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elliott, R.A.; Boyd, M.J.; Salema, N.E.; Davies, J.; Barber, N.; Mehta, R.L.; Tanajewski, L.; Waring, J.; Latif, A.; Gkountouras, G.; et al. Supporting adherence for people starting a new medication for a long-term condition through community pharmacies: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the New Medicine Service. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2016, 25, 747–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Merks, P.; Świeczkowski, D.; Balcerzak, M.; Religioni, U.; Drelich, E.; Krysiński, J.; Hering, D.; Jaguszewski, M. Patient counselling service with the use of pictograms as the example of pharmacist intervention to improving compliance and medicine safety. Cardiol. J. 2021, 28, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mansell, K.; Bootsman, N.; Kuntz, A.; Taylor, J. Evaluating pharmacist prescribing for minor ailments. Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 2015, 23, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Taylor, J.G.; Joubert, R. Pharmacist-led minor ailment programs: A Canadian perspective. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2016, 9, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aly, M.; García-Cárdenas, V.; Williams, K.; Benrimoj, S.I. A review of international pharmacy-based minor ailment services and proposed service design model. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2018, 14, 989–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ministry of Health. Pharmaceutical Care Report. Comprehensive Analysis of the Implementation Process. Repeat Prescriptions 2017–2019 POZ and AOS; Department of Analysis and Strategy of the Ministry of Health: Warsaw, Poland, 2020. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/gif/raport-opieka-farmaceutyczna-kompleksowa-analiza-procesu-wdrozenia-juz-dostepny (accessed on 22 October 2023).
  52. Act of 14 May 2020 Amending Certain Acts on Protective Measures in Connection with the Spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus. Chancellery of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. 2020. Available online: https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/proc9.nsf/ustawy/344_u.htm (accessed on 7 July 2024).
  53. Merks, P.; Byliniak, M.; Olszewska, A.; Świeczkowski, D.; Paluch, A.; Śliwa, R.; Słomiak, L.; Kaźmierczak, J.; Krupa, K.; Krysiński, J. Pharmaceutical service—Repeating prescriptions as a way to integrate the medical and pharmaceutical communities. Farm. Pol. 2015, 71, 574–585. [Google Scholar]
  54. WHO. Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Country Profiles. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514620 (accessed on 16 August 2024).
  55. Kelling, S.E.; Rondon-Begazo, A.; DiPietro Mager, N.A.; Murphy, B.L.; Bright, D.R. Provision of Clinical Preventive Services by Community Pharmacists. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2016, 13, E149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Willis, A.; Rivers, P.; Gray, L.J.; Davies, M.; Khunti, K. The effectiveness of screening for diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors in a community pharmacy setting. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ayorinde, A.A.; Porteous, T.; Sharma, P. Screening for major diseases in community pharmacies: A systematic review. Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 2013, 21, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Poudel, A.; Lau, E.T.L.; Deldot, M.; Campbell, C.; Waite, N.M.; Nissen, L.M. Pharmacist role in vaccination: Evidence and challenges. Vaccine 2019, 37, 5939–5945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alsaleh, N.A. Pharmacist-led flu vaccination services in community pharmacy: Experiences and benefits. J. Adv. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2020, 10, 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bach, A.T.; Goad, J.A. The role of community pharmacy-based vaccination in the USA: Current practice and future directions. Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2015, 4, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kirkdale, C.L.; Nebout, G.; Megerlin, F.; Thornley, T. Benefits of pharmacist-led flu vaccination services in community pharmacy. Ann. Pharm. Fr. 2017, 75, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mereckiene, J. Seasonal Influenza Vaccination and Antiviral Use in EU/EEA Member States—Overview of Vaccine Recommendations for 2017–2018 and Vaccination Coverage Rates for 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Influenza Seasons. ECDC. 2018. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/seasonal-influenza-antiviral-use-2018.pdf (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  63. Act of July 13, 2012 Amending the Act on Preventing and Combating Infections and Infectious Diseases in Humans and the Act on the State Sanitary Inspection. Chancellery of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. 2012. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20120000892 (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  64. Czech, M.; Balcerzak, M.; Antczak, A.; Byliniak, M.; Piotrowska-Rutkowska, E.; Drozd, M.; Juszczyk, G.; Religioni, U.; Vaillancourt, R.; Merks, P. Flu vaccinations in pharmacies—A review of pharmacists fighting pandemics and infectious diseases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Skowron, A.; Polak, S.; Brandys, J. Evaluation of the ability of pharmacists to detect drug-related problems in patients with hypertension. Farm. Prz. Nauk. 2011, 8, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  66. Skowron, A.; Polak, S.; Brandys, J. The impact of pharmaceutical care on patients with hypertension and their pharmacists. Pharm. Pract. 2011, 9, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Skowron, A.; Polak, W.; Polak, S.; Polak, M. Dokumentowanie opieki farmaceutycznej z wykorzystaniem bazy FONTiC (Providing pharmaceutical care documentation with PCHAD application). Farm. Pol. 2010, 66, 393–402. [Google Scholar]
  68. Skowron, A.; Polak, W.; Golda, A.; Dymek, J.; Pelka, P. The effectiveness of pharmaceutical care in diabetes in Poland—Markov model. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2015, 37, 419. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Merks, P.; Kowalczuk, A.; Howell, A.; Białoszewski, A.; Strocka, J.; Krajewska, E.; Pinkas, J.; Ostrowski, J.; Staniszewska, A.; Neumann-Podczaska, A.; et al. Advancing Pharmaceutical Care in Community Pharmacies in Poland: A Blueprint for Enhanced Patient Care Quality. Healthcare 2024, 12, 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212109

AMA Style

Merks P, Kowalczuk A, Howell A, Białoszewski A, Strocka J, Krajewska E, Pinkas J, Ostrowski J, Staniszewska A, Neumann-Podczaska A, et al. Advancing Pharmaceutical Care in Community Pharmacies in Poland: A Blueprint for Enhanced Patient Care Quality. Healthcare. 2024; 12(21):2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Merks, Piotr, Anna Kowalczuk, Aleksandra Howell, Artur Białoszewski, Justyna Strocka, Ewa Krajewska, Jarosław Pinkas, Janusz Ostrowski, Anna Staniszewska, Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, and et al. 2024. "Advancing Pharmaceutical Care in Community Pharmacies in Poland: A Blueprint for Enhanced Patient Care Quality" Healthcare 12, no. 21: 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212109

APA Style

Merks, P., Kowalczuk, A., Howell, A., Białoszewski, A., Strocka, J., Krajewska, E., Pinkas, J., Ostrowski, J., Staniszewska, A., Neumann-Podczaska, A., Brzozowska, M., Augustynowicz, A., Borowska, M., Drab, A., Herda, J., Kaźmierczak, J., & Religioni, U. (2024). Advancing Pharmaceutical Care in Community Pharmacies in Poland: A Blueprint for Enhanced Patient Care Quality. Healthcare, 12(21), 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop