Next Article in Journal
A Study of Factors Influencing the Volume of Responses to Posts in Physician Online Community
Next Article in Special Issue
Operational Health Pavilions in Mass Disasters: Lessons Learned from the 2023 Earthquake in Turkey and Syria
Previous Article in Journal
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Movement Behaviour Questionnaire into Malay Language (MBQ-M) for Measuring Movement Behaviors among Preschool Children in Kelantan, Malaysia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Affecting the Public Intention to Repeat the COVID-19 Vaccination: Implications for Vaccine Communication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Psychological Resilience: Examining the Impact of Managerial Support on Mental Health Outcomes for Saudi Ambulance Personnel

by
Ahmed M. Al-Wathinani
1,*,
Mohannad A. Almusallam
2,
Nawaf A. Albaqami
1,
Mohammed Aljuaid
3,
Abdullah A. Alghamdi
1,
Mohammad A. Alhallaf
1 and
Krzysztof Goniewicz
4
1
Department of Emergency Medical Services, Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
National Guard Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Dirab Primary Health Center Riyadh, Riyadh 14972, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Security Studies, Polish Air Force University, 08-521 Dęblin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(9), 1277; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091277
Submission received: 8 April 2023 / Revised: 26 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 29 April 2023

Abstract

:
Ambulance personnel are among the groups with high mental health risks. This study aims to investigate the role of managerial support in determining the mental well-being of ambulance personnel, a group at high risk for mental health issues. A descriptive, cross-sectional survey design was conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in February 2022, involving a convenience sample of 354 ambulance personnel. An online survey was distributed via social media platforms. Manager behavior and mental well-being were assessed using the Manager Behavior Questionnaire (MBQ) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS). The participants represented nearly equal-sized groups from different agencies, with 50.3% residing in the Riyadh Region and 67.5% aged between 25 and 34. The mean score for manager behavior was 2.92 ± 1.124, while the mental well-being scale’s mean score was 3.398 ± 0.8219. Variance analyses revealed statistically significant differences in manager behavior concerning gender, age, residence, and years of experience (p < 0.05), as well as in the mental well-being of ambulance personnel. Generalized linear regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between manager behavior and mental well-being (p < 0.01). Focusing on improving organizational management behaviors is a promising strategy for enhancing mental health interventions among ambulance personnel. Further research is recommended to monitor the mental health of these professionals and develop evidence-based interventions to support their well-being.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization highlights the importance of mental health as part of overall well-being, encompassing not just the absence of mental disorders or disabilities, but also the ability to realize one’s potential, cope with life’s stresses, work productively, and contribute to the community [1]. Workplace stress is a critical issue, impacting both employees’ health and well-being and an organization’s productivity. High-stress occupations, such as emergency medical services (EMS), face an elevated risk of depression and anxiety [2].
Emergency health professionals’ performance and output are significantly affected by stress, resulting in high emotional costs [3]. Prehospital settings, in particular, subject EMS workers to constant emotional strain. Stress levels among these workers can range from 6% to 80% [4,5]. Unpredictable environments, as well as daily and cumulative trauma contribute to mental distress and psychological injury among ambulance personnel, who encompass individuals employed by emergency service provider agencies involved in prehospital or interhospital transport of patients requiring emergency care or life support services [6]. Because of their workload, ambulance personnel often report increased psychiatric and psychological distress symptoms, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress [7].
Paramedics, as frontline healthcare professionals, are frequently confronted with a myriad of highly stressful situations that demand effective coping mechanisms for dealing with unforeseen and non-specific threats [8]. In countries such as South Africa, EMS reports suggest that employees experience critical incidents at a higher frequency compared with their counterparts in more developed nations. [9]. Similarly, Saudi paramedics have been found to experience elevated levels of depression, PTSD, sleeplessness, exhaustion, and diminished physical functioning when compared with their Australian counterparts [10].
Despite the apparent need for psychological support, the Psychological Support Unit (PSU) of the Saudi Red Crescent Authority (SRCA) reveals that only a small percentage of cases reported to the PSU for psychological assistance and management are from SRCA workers [11]. This gap in accessing mental health services may be attributed to various factors, such as stigma surrounding mental health, lack of awareness of available resources, or insufficient organizational support.
EMS providers confront a wide array of challenges that can impede their effectiveness in delivering critical care. To bolster their efficiency, it is vital to thoroughly assess the scope of these difficulties, eradicate barriers, and offer comprehensive education and training programs [12]. Interventions aimed at enhancing mental health and well-being in industries with higher risks, such as EMS, have traditionally focused on individual-level factors. However, there is a growing interest in organizational-level interventions that recognize the significant role of managerial behavior in shaping a team’s success, morale, employee turnover, and overall workplace culture [13].
Organizational-level factors play a critical role in shaping the work environment, with the potential to influence mental health outcomes and job satisfaction among employees. In the EMS industry, it is essential to examine the impact of managerial practices, communication styles, and resource allocation on stress levels and well-being. By fostering a supportive atmosphere that emphasizes trust and open communication, EMS organizations can enhance employee well-being, leading to improved performance, retention, and overall service quality. Consequently, exploring the relationship between managerial support and the mental health of ambulance personnel is crucial for devising effective strategies that contribute to the improvement of emergency health systems.
The primary objective of this study is to examine the importance of managerial support in determining the mental well-being of ambulance personnel in Saudi Arabia, considering the heightened mental health risks they encounter. Gaining insight into the influence of managerial support on mental well-being is essential for devising effective interventions and strategies aimed at improving the overall mental health of these professionals. By highlighting the connection between managerial behavior and mental well-being, our research offers valuable guidance for policymakers and organizations in developing a supportive work environment that fosters mental health among frontline workers. Ultimately, this will enhance the quality of emergency medical services and contribute to the well-being of the communities they serve.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample and Procedures

The study, conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in February 2022, employed a robust descriptive cross-sectional survey design to investigate the relationship between managerial support and mental health among ambulance personnel. The target population consisted of various categories of ambulance personnel, including call takers, ambulance dispatchers, and front-line EMS personnel such as emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and intensive care paramedics, currently employed by the Saudi Red Crescent Authority (SRCA), government, and private health sectors in Saudi Arabia. Administrators, volunteers, and trainees were excluded from the study.
Demographic characteristics encompassed gender, age, nationality, region of residence, current employer (governmental or private sector), and years of experience. Additionally, the participants were categorized based on their skill levels, such as emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and intensive care paramedics. The employer region was categorized into five main regions—central, northern, western, southern, and eastern—that encompass all 13 administrative areas of Saudi Arabia.
We aimed to identify any notable differences between governmental and private sector organizations, particularly concerning the impact and behaviors of management. This allowed for a more comprehensive understanding of how organizational context may influence the relationship between managerial support and mental health among ambulance personnel.

2.2. Measures

Data collection utilized a modified questionnaire adapted from a previous open-access study that examined the importance of different managerial support factors in determining the mental health of ambulance personnel in Australia [12]. The modifications were made to better suit the cultural context and organizational structure of ambulance services in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire integrated the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) to assess mental well-being. SWEMWBS has been validated in both community and clinical samples [13], and primarily focuses on measuring an individual’s mental well-being. The scale consisted of seven positively phrased items, assessing well-being over the last two weeks on a five-point Likert scale. Total scores ranged from 7–35, with higher scores indicating greater overall psychological well-being.
Managerial behavior was assessed using a reliable and validated nine-item scale, known as the Managerial Behavior Questionnaire (MBQ). This questionnaire gauges employees’ direct experiences of various aspects of their manager’s behavior (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95) [12] and is designed to measure the perceived supportiveness of managerial behaviors. The positively worded items were evaluated on a five-point Likert frequency scale and summed to give a total score ranging from 9–45. Lower scores indicated less supportive, critical, and distant managers, while higher scores represented more frequent supportive managerial behaviors, such as providing encouragement and resources.
To ensure the anonymity of respondents, no personally identifiable information was collected during the survey process. All responses were coded using unique identifiers, and the data were stored securely with access limited to the research team.
The survey link was disseminated to ambulance personnel through Twitter, WhatsApp, and other social media platforms from February to April 2022.

2.3. Statistical Tools

Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v26). Demographics, manager behavior, and mental well-being were assessed through frequency tables, reliability and validity tests, relative importance tests, variance analyses, descriptive statistics, and t-tests. Generalized linear regression models were employed to establish the relationship between managerial support and the mental well-being of ambulance personnel.

2.4. Ethical Considerations

Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained from the King Saud University Research and Ethics Committee (Ref No: KSU-HE-22-060) in February 2022.

3. Results

A total of 400 participants completed the online survey. After excluding invalid responses from administrators, volunteers, and trainees (n = 45), the final sample consisted of 354 ambulance personnel. The majority of the participants were male (84.5%), Saudi nationals (98.9%), and aged between 25 and 34 years old (67.5%). Over half of the respondents (59.6%) were single. The predominant educational level among participants was a bachelor’s degree (79.4%), and nearly half (46.9%) had one to five years of work experience in the ambulance field.
The study collected responses from 11 out of the 13 administrative regions in Saudi Arabia, with approximately half of the participants (50.3%) residing in the Riyadh Region. The respondents represented a fairly balanced distribution across agencies, with 37.9% from the SRCA, 36.4% from the governmental health sector, and 25.7% from the private health sector. The regional distribution of employer locations showed varied response rates. The majority of participants worked in the central region (48%), followed by the eastern, western, southern, and northern regions. Detailed characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1.

3.1. Descriptive Statistics and t-Test

Descriptive statistics for the study dimensions (manager behavior and mental well-being) were calculated, including the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and t-test. Table 2 and Table 3 display the descriptive statistics and t-test results for the elements of the manager behavior and mental well-being scales, while Appendix A and Appendix B contain Table A1 and Table A2, which present the frequency distribution and percentage of the items for both scales.
The manager behavior scale had a mean of 2.92 ±1.124, indicating that the majority of the sample exhibited neutrality, rather than disagreement, with the elements. In contrast, the mental well-being scale yielded a mean of 3.398 ± 0.8219, signifying that most of the sample agreed with the elements. The coefficient of variation for all dimensions was less than 50, demonstrating low dispersion around the mean. The t-test revealed a level of significance for elements (1) and (5) of the manager behavior scale at p < 0.05, with an average lower than that of (3); hence, the responses disagreed with these statements. All elements of the mental well-being scale exhibited a level of significance at p < 0.05, rendering all statements statistically significant.

3.2. Factors Associated with Manager Behavior

The Mann–Whitney test revealed statistically significant differences in manager behavior based on the gender of the ambulance personnel (p < 0.05). The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated statistically significant differences in manager behavior according to the participants’ age, residence, and experience (p < 0.05) (refer to Appendix C, Appendix D, Appendix E and Appendix F: Table A3, Table A4, Table A5 and Table A6).

3.3. Factors Associated with Mental Well-Being of Ambulance Personnel

The Kruskal–Wallis test indicated statistically significant differences in the mental well-being of ambulance personnel based on their region of residence (p < 0.05). Additional details can be found in Appendix E: Table A5.

3.4. Impact of Manager Behavior on Mental Well-Being

A generalized linear regression model (Normal with Identity link) was employed to determine whether the independent variable (manager behavior score) had a statistically significant impact on the dependent variable (mental well-being score).
The normal regression model, based on a normal distribution, linked the independent variables to the predicted value of the dependent variable through the identity link function. The goodness-of-fit results suggested the best model, as illustrated in Table 4. The Omnibus Test showed that the model was significant (p < 0.01), as presented in Table 5.
The model parameters and standard errors for each estimate, including the Wald chi-square value, R-square value, and level of significance, were obtained. The manager behavior score significantly influenced the mental well-being score (p > 0.01), with an R-square of 0.35 (Table 6). The remaining percentage was either a random error or could be attributed to other independent variables not included in the model.

4. Discussion

This study examined the association between managerial support and the mental health of ambulance personnel, finding a statistically significant relationship between managerial support and the mental well-being of ambulance personnel in Saudi Arabia. This finding is consistent with a previous study conducted on ambulance personnel in Australia [14]. Our results identified statistically significant differences in managerial behavior based on gender, age, residence, and years of experience among ambulance personnel, as well as their mental well-being, in relation to their residential region.
One potential challenge faced by ambulance personnel in this study could be the difficulty in feeling relaxed amidst the high-pressure work environment. A possible managerial deficiency that emerged might be the inadequate attention given to the feelings and concerns of these frontline workers. This gap in support could lead to difficulties in effectively communicating work-related stress to their supervisors, leaving ambulance personnel feeling unheard and unsupported. Such communication barriers may contribute to a cumulative negative impact on the mental well-being of ambulance personnel, potentially leading to burnout, reduced job satisfaction, and increased turnover. Therefore, it is essential for organizations to consider the importance of open lines of communication and empathy from management towards their staff. By addressing these managerial shortcomings, organizations may create an environment in which ambulance personnel feel more comfortable discussing their concerns and stressors. In turn, this could enable the development and implementation of targeted support strategies to help alleviate stress, promote a healthy work–life balance, and ultimately enhance the mental well-being and overall performance of these essential frontline workers.
Poor psychological well-being can negatively impact medical professionals’ quality of life, which may, in turn, affect the quality of medical services they provide [15,16]. Identifying and addressing the factors contributing to workplace stress are essential for effectively managing and preventing mental health issues. Previous research has linked stress, depression, and anxiety to the level of engagement in patient care among EMS workers [17,18], with factors such as participants’ age, sex, workload, work duration, and sleep duration being examined.
Psychosocial support plays a crucial role in enabling interventions that help individuals process incidents more effectively, mediate strong emotions, change beliefs, and cope with situations to function more efficiently. Maintaining mental health at the core of operations is critical for enhancing the psychological resilience of ambulance personnel [19], who are constantly exposed to emotional strain. Stress levels among EMS workers can range from 6% to 80% [3,4], with anxiety, depression, and PTSD being associated with the pressures of emergency care and empathy for patients’ needs [3,19]. A study from Riyadh found anxiety disorders in 20.7%, 23.7%, and 7.6% of Saudi Arabia’s emergency department staff, respectively [17].
Mental health is the cornerstone of our collective and individual abilities as humans to think, emote, interact, earn a living, and enjoy life. As such, promoting, protecting, and restoring mental health are essential concerns for individuals, communities, and societies across the globe [1]. Ambulance personnel and their managers, due to the nature of their work, face unpredictable and often high-stress situations that can significantly impact their mental well-being. In recognition of these challenges, the Department of Health [20] has emphasized the importance of a psychosocial approach to support employees, advocating for strategies that complement the employer’s responsibility to safeguard the mental health and well-being of their team [21,22]. This approach involves understanding and addressing the unique mental health needs of ambulance personnel, providing resources for stress management, and fostering a supportive work environment that promotes open communication, resilience, and overall psychological wellness.
This study highlights the crucial role of managerial support in shaping the mental well-being of ambulance personnel in Saudi Arabia. The findings stress the importance of organizations concentrating on enhancing managerial behavior, cultivating open communication channels, and offering resources to tackle the mental health challenges confronted by these frontline workers. By comprehending the relationship between manager behavior and mental well-being, organizations can develop customized interventions and foster a nurturing work environment that bolsters the overall health and resilience of ambulance personnel [22,23]. Incorporating comprehensive mental health support within the organization not only benefits the ambulance personnel themselves, but also results in a positive ripple effect throughout the emergency medical services sector. By addressing the mental well-being of these workers, organizations may improve employee retention, reduce burnout, and enhance overall job satisfaction. This, in turn, may leads to higher-quality emergency medical services, better patient care, and strengthened public health outcomes [24,25,26,27,28]. Ultimately, investing in the mental health and well-being of ambulance personnel is a vital step towards creating a more resilient and effective emergency medical service system that benefits both the workers and the communities they serve.

5. Limitations

This his study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Firstly, the cross-sectional nature of this study prevents us from establishing a causal relationship between managerial support and the mental well-being of ambulance personnel. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the directionality of these associations.
Secondly, the study relied on self-reported data from participants, which may introduce bias due to social desirability, recall errors, or misunderstanding of questions. Future research could benefit from incorporating objective measures or observations to validate the findings. Additionally, the study used a convenience sampling method, which may limit the generalizability of the results. The participants may not be representative of the entire population of ambulance personnel in Saudi Arabia. A random sampling approach would provide more generalizable findings.
The survey distribution through social media platforms might also introduce selection bias, as not all ambulance personnel may be active on these platforms or may choose to participate. This may limit the representativeness of the sample.
Some variables were measured using single items, which may not capture the full complexity of the constructs. Future studies should consider using more comprehensive, multi-item measures to assess variables of interest. Finally, the study was conducted in Saudi Arabia, and the findings may not be generalizable to ambulance personnel in other countries with different cultural, organizational, and healthcare contexts.

6. Conclusions

This study examined the association between manager support and the mental well-being of currently employed ambulance personnel. The findings highlight the importance of providing appropriate support to ambulance personnel, who face high levels of stress and emotional strain in their daily work. By addressing the role of managerial behavior in the mental well-being of these frontline workers, healthcare organizations can improve the overall quality of emergency medical services and foster a healthier, more resilient workforce.
The study identifies the need for organizational interventions that focus on enhancing managerial support to promote a positive working environment for ambulance personnel. By improving communication, providing resources, and offering encouragement, managers can contribute to the mental well-being of their teams. This, in turn, can lead to better performance, reduced employee turnover, and improved patient care.
Given the high stress and emotional demands associated with ambulance work, it is crucial for healthcare organizations and policymakers to prioritize the mental well-being of these professionals. This study offers valuable insights into the factors associated with the mental health of ambulance personnel, paving the way for future research and the development of evidence-based interventions.
Ultimately, the promotion, protection, and restoration of mental health among ambulance personnel should be a central concern for healthcare organizations and policymakers. By understanding and addressing the factors that influence mental well-being in this high-risk population, we can ensure the ongoing delivery of high-quality emergency medical services and support the health and well-being of those who dedicate their lives to saving others.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.A.-W., methodology, A.M.A.-W., M.A.A. (Mohannad A. Almusallam), and N.A.A.; software, A.M.A.-W., validation, A.M.A.-W., formal analysis, M.A. and A.M.A.-W.; investigation, A.A.A. and M.A.A. (Mohammad A. Alhallaf); resources, A.M.A.-W.; data curation, A.M.A.-W. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.A.-W., M.A.A. (Mohannad A. Almusallam), N.A.A., M.A., A.A.A. and K.G. writing—review and editing, A.M.A.-W. and. K.G.; visualization, A.M.A.-W., supervision, A.M.A.-W. and K.G. project administration, A.M.A.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained from the King Saud University Research and Ethics Committee (Ref No: KSU-HE-22-060.), February 2022.

Informed Consent Statement

The information included the study’s purpose, the voluntary nature of their participation, and strict confidentiality and secure data storage. The survey was anonymous and all respondents agreed to participate in the survey. Written consent was obtained from participants who completed the online questionnaire.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author uon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to King Saud University for funding this work through the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R649), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saud Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Frequency distribution and percentage for items of manager behavior.
Table A1. Frequency distribution and percentage for items of manager behavior.
SrItems
My Supervisor…
ValidNever/Hardly EverRarelySometimesOftenAlways
1… pays attention to my feelings and problems and notices if I’m not feeling so well.n70102894944
%19.828.825.113.812.4
2… shows that they appreciate the way I do my jobn6477847455
%18.121.823.720.915.5
3… helps me with a certain task if necessaryn50791046061
%14.122.329.416.917.2
4… gives me advice on how to handle things if necessaryn5279976363
%14.722.327.417.817.8
5… would be someone I would speak to if I was experiencing workplace stress.n10082784351
%28.223.22212.114.4
6… is considerate when managing team membersn53801047047
%1522.629.419.813.3
7…involves me in decision makingn75701035650
%21.219.829.115.814.1
8… is accessible and approachable to people in the teamn31811057166
%8.822.929.720.118.6
9… remains objective when an issue between staff members arisen46691146263
%13.019.532.217.517.8
Totaln541719878548500
%16.9822.5732.217.517.8

Appendix B

Table A2. Frequency distribution and percentage for items of mental well-being dimension.
Table A2. Frequency distribution and percentage for items of mental well-being dimension.
Sr.ItemsValidNone of the TimeRarelySome of the TimeOftenAll of the Time
1I’ve been feeling optimistic about the futuren21441349659
%5.912.437.927.116.7
2I’ve been feeling useful.n22368911592
%6.210.225.132.526.0
3I’ve been feeling relaxed.n49961096337
%13.827.130.817.810.5
4I’ve been dealing with problems well.n173210513862
%4.8929.73917.5
5I’ve been thinking clearlyn184110513159
%5.111.629.73716.7
6I’ve been feeling close to other peoplen25658911263
%7.118.425.131.617.8
7I’ve been able to make up my own mind about thingsn15379913370
%4.210.52837.619.8
Totaln167351730788442
%6.7414.1629.4631.8017.84

Appendix C

Table A3. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to gender.
Table A3. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to gender.
DimensionsGenderNMean
Rank
Mann–WhitneySig.
Manager BehaviorMale299171.906547.0000.016
Female55207.96
Mental Well-BeingMale299179.517620.5000.387
Female55166.55

Appendix D

Table A4. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to age.
Table A4. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to age.
DimensionsAgeNMean
Rank
Kruskal–WallisSig.
Manager Behavior<2568216.6317.220.004
25–34 years239167.25
35–44 years37175.11
45–54 years6217.75
55–60 years3112.00
>60110.00
Mental Well-Being<2568190.078.7100.121
25–34 years239173.38
35–44 years37178.00
45–54 years6254.42
55–60 years3118.83
>6013.50

Appendix E

Table A5. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to residence.
Table A5. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to residence.
DimensionsResidenceNMean
Rank
Kruskal–WallisSig.
Manager BehaviorRiyadh Region178171.5226.8630.008
Makkah Region60198.43
Madinah Region15160.90
Qasim Region6145.92
Eastern Province58204.54
Asir Region8173.13
Tabuk Region665.33
Hail Region3192.83
Jazan Region5250.60
Najran Region9126.06
Bahah Region110.00
Outside Saudi Arabia244.75
Unknown3134.33
Mental Well-BeingRiyadh Region178166.393.1850.000
Makkah Region60202.15
Madinah Region1599.57
Qasim Region6167.33
Eastern Province58209.79
Asir Region8167.44
Tabuk Region6135.00
Hail Region3243.50
Jazan Region5251.50
Najran Region9123.28
Bahah Region1349.50
Outside Saudi Arabia210.75
Unknown3268.33

Appendix F

Table A6. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to years of experience.
Table A6. The variance analysis of the study’s dimensions according to years of experience.
DimensionsYears of ExperienceNMean
Rank
Kruskal–WallisSig.
Manager Behavior<1 year96213.8818.7250.001
1 to 5 years166167.03
6 to 10 years48153.22
11 to 15 years28177.80
16 years and above16140.19
Mental Well-Being<1 year96187.735.1510.272
1 to 5 years166166.01
6 to 10 years48176.51
11 to 15 years28197.89
16 years and above16202.63

References

  1. Ward, C.L.; Lombard, C.J.; Gwebushe, N. Critical incident exposure in South African emergency services personnel: Prevalence and associated mental health issues. Emerg. Med. J. 2006, 23, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alzahrani, A.Y.; Mahmod, S.; Bakhamis, T.M.; Al-Surimi, K. Improving referral to psychological support unit at Saudi Red Crescent Authority in Riyadh Region. BMJ Open Qual. 2017, 6, e000089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ardebili, M.E.; Naserbakht, M.; Bernstein, C.; Alazmani-Noodeh, F.; Hakimi, H.; Ranjbar, H. Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2021, 49, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alanazi, A.F. Emergency medical services in Saudi Arabia: A study on the significance of paramedics and their experiences on barriers as inhibitors of their efficiency. Int. J. Appl. Basic Med. Res. 2012, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan WA, A.; Conduit, R.; Kennedy, G.A.; Abdullah Alslamah, A.; Ahmad Alsuwayeh, M.; Jackson, M.L. Sleep and mental health among paramedics from Australia and Saudi Arabia: A comparison study. Clocks Sleep 2020, 2, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kashani, M.; Eliasson, A.; Chrosniak, L.; Vernalis, M. Taking aim at nurse stress: A call to action. Mil. Med. 2010, 175, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mahindru, P.; Sharma, M.K.; Chaturvedi, S.K. Job Related Stress and Employment of People with Mental Illness: A Catch 22. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health 2016, 3, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bentley, M.A.; Crawford, J.M.; Wilkins, J.R.; Fernandez, A.R.; Studnek, J.R. An assessment of depression, anxiety, and stress among nationally certified EMS professionals. Prehospital Emerg. Care 2013, 17, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lawn, S.; Roberts, L.; Willis, E.; Couzner, L.; Mohammadi, L.; Goble, E. The effects of emergency medical service work on the psychological, physical, and social well-being of ambulance personnel: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petrie, K.; Milligan-Saville, J.; Gayed, A.; Deady, M.; Phelps, A.; Dell, L.; Forbes, D.; Bryant, R.A.; Calvo, R.A.; Glozier, N.; et al. Prevalence of PTSD and common mental disorders amongst ambulance personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2018, 53, 897–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al Enazi, S.; AlEnzie, A.N. Stress and burnout among Red Crescent paramedic ambulance workers in Riyadh. Integr. Traum. Emerg. Med. 2018, 6, 2–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mental Health: Strengthening Our Response. 30 March 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response (accessed on 2 April 2023).
  13. Patterson, P.D.; Probst, J.C.; Leith, K.H.; Corwin, S.J.; Powell, M.P. Recruitment and retention of emergency medical technicians: A qualitative study. J. Allied Health 2005, 34, 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  14. McGuinness, S.L.; Johnson, J.; Eades, O.; Cameron, P.A.; Forbes, A.; Fisher, J.; Grantham, K.; Hodgson, C.; Hunter, P.; Kasza, J.; et al. Mental health outcomes in Australian healthcare and aged-care workers during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stewart-Brown, S.; Tennant, A.; Tennant, R.; Platt, S.; Parkinson, J.; Weich, S. Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2009, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bartone, P.T. Resilience under military operational stress: Can leaders influence hardiness? Mil. Psychol. 2006, 18 (Suppl. S1), S131–S148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brewin, C.R.; Andrews, B.; Valentine, J.D. Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2000, 68, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harvey, S.B.; Milligan-Saville, J.S.; Paterson, H.; Harkness, E.L.; Marsh, A.M.; Dobson, M.; Kemp, R.; Bryant, R.A. The mental health of fire-fighters: An examination of the impact of repeated trauma exposure. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2016, 50, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McCraty, R.; Atkinson, M. Resilience training program reduces physiological and psychological stress in police officers. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2012, 1, 44–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Department of Health. NHS Emergency Planning Guidance: Planning for the Psychosocial and Mental Health Care of People Affected by Major Incidents and Disasters: Interim National Strategic Guidance. 2009. Available online: https://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/nhs-emergency-planning-guidance-planning-for-the-psychosocial-and-mental-health-care-of-people-affected-by-major-incidents-and-disasters-interim-national-strategic-guidance/r/a11G00000017sVYIAY (accessed on 7 April 2023).
  21. Greenberg, N.; Docherty, M.; Gnanapragasam, S.; Wessely, S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ 2020, 368, m1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bennett, P.; Williams, Y.; Page, N.; Hood, K.; Woollard, M. Levels of mental health problems among UK emergency ambulance workers. Emerg. Med. J. 2004, 21, 235–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Berger, W.; Coutinho, E.S.F.; Figueira, I.; Marques-Portella, C.; Luz, M.P.; Neylan, T.C.; Marmar, C.R.; Mendlowicz, M.V. Rescuers at risk: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the worldwide current prevalence and correlates of PTSD in rescue workers. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2012, 47, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Petrie, K.; Gayed, A.; Bryan, B.T.; Deady, M.; Madan, I.; Savic, A.; Wooldridge, Z.; Counson, I.; Calvo, R.A.; Glozier, N.; et al. The importance of manager support for the mental health and well-being of ambulance personnel. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. NHS England. NHS England Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response Framework. 2015. Available online: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/eprr-framework.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2023).
  26. Al-Wathinani, A.M.; Barten, D.G.; Al-Balawi, H.; Al-Aqeel, S.; Al-Dulijan, N.; Al-Ghamdi, K.; Al-Shammari, S.; Alhallaf, M.A.; Aljuaid, M.; Tin, D.; et al. Reducing Violence in Riyadh’s Emergency Departments: The Critical Role of Healthcare Providers. Healthcare 2023, 11, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Goniewicz, K.; Carlström, E.; Hertelendy, A.J.; Burkle, F.M.; Goniewicz, M.; Lasota, D.; Richmond, J.G.; Khorram-Manesh, A. Integrated healthcare and the dilemma of public health emergencies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goniewicz, K.; Goniewicz, M.; Włoszczak-Szubzda, A.; Burkle, F.M.; Hertelendy, A.J.; Al-Wathinani, A.; Molloy, M.S.; Khorram-Manesh, A. The importance of pre-training gap analyses and the identification of competencies and skill requirements of medical personnel for mass casualty incidents and disaster training. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Frequency of demographics (N = 354).
Table 1. Frequency of demographics (N = 354).
Frequency%
SexMale29984.5
Female5515.5
Age<256819.2
25–34 years23967.5
35–44 years3710.5
45–54 years61.7
55–60 years30.8
>6010.3
NationalitySaudi35098.9
Non-Saudi41.1
ResidenceRiyadh Region17850.3
Makkah Region6016.9
Madinah Region154.2
Qasim Region61.7
Eastern Province5816.4
Asir Region82.3
Tabuk Region61.7
Hail Region30.8
Jazan Region51.4
Najran Region92.5
Bahah Region10.3
Outside Saudi Arabia20.6
Unknown30.8
Marital StatusMarried13839.0
Single21159.6
Divorced51.4
Level of EducationHigh school or less30.8
Diploma298.2
Bachelor28179.4
Postgraduate4111.6
Employer TypeSaudi Red Crescent Authority13437.9
Government Health Sector12936.4
Privet Health Sector9125.7
Employer RegionCentral region17048.0
Northern region195.4
Southern region277.6
Eastern region7120.1
Western region6718.9
Experience<1 year9627.1
1 to 5 years16646.9
6 to 10 years4813.6
11 to 15 years287.9
16 years and above164.5
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and t-test for elements for manager behavior.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and t-test for elements for manager behavior.
Sr.Elements
My Supervisor…
MeanStd. DeviationCoefficient of Variationt-TestSig.
1… pays attention to my feelings and problems and notices if I’m not feeling so well2.701.2770.47−4.3690.000
2… shows that they appreciate the way I do my job2.941.3310.45−0.8380.402
3… helps me with a certain task if necessary3.011.2850.430.1240.901
4… gives me advice on how to handle things if necessary3.021.3060.430.2440.807
5… would be someone I would speak to if I was experiencing workplace stress2.611.3840.53−5.2620.000
6… is considerate when managing team members2.941.2470.42−0.9380.349
7… involves me in decision-making2.821.3190.47−2.5780.10
8… is accessible and approachable to people in the team3.171.2250.392.6030.10
9… remains objective when an issue between staff members arise3.081.2650.411.1340.257
Manager behavior scale2.921.1240.38−1.330.184
Table 3. Descriptive statistics and t-test for elements for mental well-being.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics and t-test for elements for mental well-being.
Sr.ElementsMeanStd. DeviationCoefficient of Variationt-TestSig.
1I’ve been feeling optimistic about the future3.361.0830.326.2840.000
2I’ve been feeling useful3.621.1560.3210.0710.000
3I’ve been feeling relaxed2.841.1830.42−2.5610.011
4I’ve been dealing with problems well3.551.0340.2910.0740.000
5I’ve been thinking clearly3.491.0600.308.6260.000
6I’ve been feeling close to other people3.351.1740.355.5700.000
7I’ve been able to make up my own mind about things3.581.0510.2910.4150.000
Table 4. Goodness-of-fit of the used model.
Table 4. Goodness-of-fit of the used model.
Goodness-of-Fit
ValuedfValue/df
Deviance155.0233180.487
Scaled Deviance354.000318
Pearson Chi-Square155.0233180.487
Scaled Pearson Chi-Square354.000318
Log-Likelihood−356.151
Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC)786.302
Finite Sample Corrected AIC (AICC)795.200
Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)929.466
Consistent AIC (CAIC)966.466
Table 5. Significance test of the model.
Table 5. Significance test of the model.
Omnibus Test
Likelihood Ratio Chi-SquaredfSig.
152.460350.000
Table 6. Parameter estimates for the model.
Table 6. Parameter estimates for the model.
ParameterBStd. ErrorWald Chi-SquaredfSig.R-Square
(Intercept)2.5201.45173.01310.083
Sex--4.43110.035
Age in Years--3.21550.6670.350
Nationality--0.22310.637
Residence Area--49.500120.000
Marital Status--0.31920.852
Level of Education--4.01530.260
Employer Type--3.41320.182
Employer Region--6.70840.152
Employee Experience--10.24340.037
Manager Behavior0.3200.035083.68310.000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Wathinani, A.M.; Almusallam, M.A.; Albaqami, N.A.; Aljuaid, M.; Alghamdi, A.A.; Alhallaf, M.A.; Goniewicz, K. Enhancing Psychological Resilience: Examining the Impact of Managerial Support on Mental Health Outcomes for Saudi Ambulance Personnel. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091277

AMA Style

Al-Wathinani AM, Almusallam MA, Albaqami NA, Aljuaid M, Alghamdi AA, Alhallaf MA, Goniewicz K. Enhancing Psychological Resilience: Examining the Impact of Managerial Support on Mental Health Outcomes for Saudi Ambulance Personnel. Healthcare. 2023; 11(9):1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Wathinani, Ahmed M., Mohannad A. Almusallam, Nawaf A. Albaqami, Mohammed Aljuaid, Abdullah A. Alghamdi, Mohammad A. Alhallaf, and Krzysztof Goniewicz. 2023. "Enhancing Psychological Resilience: Examining the Impact of Managerial Support on Mental Health Outcomes for Saudi Ambulance Personnel" Healthcare 11, no. 9: 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop