Next Article in Journal
Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique versus Static Stretching in Patients with Pronated Dominant Foot: A Comparison in Effectiveness on Flexibility, Foot Posture, Foot Function Index, and Dynamic Balance
Next Article in Special Issue
Telehealth Readiness of Healthcare Providers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability Analysis of Muscle-Tone Evaluation Using a Myotonometer for Children with Developmental Disabilities
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Method of Estimating Time-to-Recovery for a Disease Caused by a Contagious Pathogen Such as SARS-CoV-2 Using a Time Series of Aggregated Case Reports
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evolution of a System to Monitor Infant Neuromotor Development in the Home: Lessons from COVID-19

Healthcare 2023, 11(6), 784; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060784
by Manon Maitland Schladen 1,*, Hsin-Hung Kuo 1, Tan Tran 2, Achuna Ofonedu 2, Hanh Hoang 1, Robert Jett 3, Megan Gu 1, Kimberly Liu 1, Kai’lyn Mohammed 1, Yas’lyn Mohammed 1, Peter S. Lum 2 and Yiannis Koumpouros 4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Healthcare 2023, 11(6), 784; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060784
Submission received: 1 January 2023 / Revised: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 7 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19: Digital Health Response around the World)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article's authors present a system to monitor infant neuromotor development using force sensor-embedded toys and 3D video captured during the interaction of babies with toys. The system is well presented, along with comparing two different versions of the system. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence - e.g., a thorough analysis of the use of both system designs by infants would improve the article's value. 

Rewrite the paragraph of line 76 (pay attention to line 79).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Very interesting subject ; suitable for publication.

Please, find my comments below :

I recommend that authors should more summurise the step of the study:

Step 1: Description of the equipment;

Step 2: Description of the start of the HUGS;

Step 3: Description of the difficulties in technical and practical levels;

Step 4: Description of the evolution of the HUGS

In the results part: Keep that the description of detected grip anomalies thanks to this system

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This research details the evolution of HUGS, a home-based system whose purpose is to empower families to monitor their infants' hand use development where there is concern for possible neuromotor problems. The first stage took place in the home but mainly under the direction of the research team, while parents were in an auxiliary role. The experiment ended prematurely by SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In the second stage, the process was under control of families, with researchers taking up the role of facilitators.

The written research is long and needs extensive editing of English language. References don't follow the numerical and usual standards. This point is the least notable. Table 2 deserves further editing, as well as tables 3 and 4. A stark cutting in the images should be solved. The same can be applied to language. For instance (sic): 
. what we had learning
. (te Velde et al., 2019)
. was The need to move most service provision to telehealth was a
. to a much simpler system for in the home
. to be implement
. Five, representative infant grasps
. a high-level, view
. selected. (See Figure 6)
. it was in their home. Robustness

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop