Next Article in Journal
Identification of Determinants of Biofeedback Treatment’s Efficacy in Treating Migraine and Oxidative Stress by ARIANNA (ARtificial Intelligent Assistant for Neural Network Analysis)
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological Comparison of the Maxillary Arch in Buccal and Palatal Canine Impaction among Asian Population of Gujarati Origin: A Hospital-Based Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Cybersecurity Culture Survey Targeting Healthcare Critical Infrastructures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

The Newfound Opportunities of Wearable Systems Based on Biofeedback in the Prevention of Falls. Comment on Tanwar et al. Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 172

by
Giovanni Morone
1,
Giovanni Maccioni
2 and
Daniele Giansanti
2,*
1
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2
Centre Tisp, The Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2022, 10(5), 940; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050940
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 May 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022
We are writing to you as the corresponding authors of the interesting systematic review study “Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review” [1].
We found this work to be particularly stimulating, and feel it provides great added value in the field.
Specifically, we believe, first of all, that this review has the great merit of simultaneously focusing both on important key aspects of the integration of systems for fall detection/prediction and prevention in the health domain, and on aspects relating to technological innovation and deployment in the three most important fields, where neuromotor problems due to pathologies or aging have a strong impact: falls from bed, falls from sitting, and falls from walking and standing. When the Special Issue “Cybersecurity and the Digital Health: An Investigation on the State of the Art and the Position of the Actors” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/healthcare/special_issues/cybersecurity_digital_health (accessed on 1 May 2022)) [2] was launched, one of the objectives [3] was to give scholars the opportunity to broaden the boundaries of studies in this area.
Mainly, studies on cybersecurity turn more toward IT aspects, which is defined as the activity carried out in defending computers, servers, mobile devices, electronic systems, networks, and data from malicious attacks or software defaults. Therefore, what is often addressed is so-called information security and data security.
We very much appreciated your contribution because it has precisely achieved the goal of expanding and exploring new areas in this sector, enlarging the concept of cyber-systems as tools for the development of physical security approaches for people.
We found your work particularly interesting, wide-ranging, attractive and full of stimuli for future research. We agree with the findings of the study, that falling is one of the most serious health risks throughout the world for elderly people and for people affected by particular diseases or after recovery from accidents. In the event of a fall, as you have highlighted, considerable expenses are unfortunately necessary for patient management in the health domain. The cyber-systems developed in the field of fall risk, detection/prediction and prevention have the potential to minimize these problems. This is why we believe that your work, that has reviewed papers systematically (publications, projects, and patents), is strategic in this perspective.
As we wrote above, your study, being a review, is also very stimulating toward research initiatives to be undertaken in the future.
We would therefore like to share a reflection on this with you and with the other scholars involved in this field of research.
In the past, there has been much discussion about biofeedback systems for the prevention of falls through training and/or the use of wearable systems. Several studies have been developed based on audio, video, and vibrotactile biofeedback systems [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], some involving some of us as authors [8,13]. Many of these wearable systems were considered even before the smartphone boom as we know it today [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Some recent studies are continuing in this direction [20,21,22,23]. The use of inertial sensors, such as accelerometers, for stability control [24,25,26] integrated in wearable systems equipped with biofeedback [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] will certainly provide an increasingly important response in the prevention of falls.
In conclusion, we believe that your review has been a great stimulus for the Special Issue and for the scholars in general regarding future developments. Among these future developments, we also consider important those connected to wearable systems equipped with biofeedback for the prevention of falls.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tanwar, R.; Nandal, N.; Zamani, M.; Manaf, A.A. Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/healthcare/special_issues/cybersecurity_digital_health (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  3. Giansanti, D. Cybersecurity and the Digital-Health: The Challenge of This Millennium. Healthcare 2021, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mirelman, A.; Herman, T.; Nicolai, S.; Zijlstra, A.; Zijlstra, W.; Becker, C.; Chiari, L.; Hausdorff, J.M. Audio-biofeedback training for posture and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2011, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zijlstra, A.; Mancini, M.; Chiari, L.; Zijlstra, W. Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: A systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2010, 7, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pirini, M.; Mancini, M.; Farella, E.; Chiari, L. EEG correlates of postural audio- biofeedback. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2011, 30, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Horak, F.B.; Dozza, M.; Peterka, R.; Chiari, L.; Wall, C., 3rd. Vibrotactile biofeedback improves tandem gait in patients with unilateral vestibular loss. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1164, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Giansanti, D.; Dozza, M.; Chiari, L.; Maccioni, G.; Cappello, A. Energetic assessment of trunk postural modifications induced by a wearable audio-biofeedback system. Med. Eng. Phys. 2009, 31, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dozza, M.; Wall, C., 3rd; Peterka, R.J.; Chiari, L.; Horak, F.B. Effects of practicing tandem gait with and without vibrotactile biofeedback in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss. J. Vestib. Res. 2007, 17, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dozza, M.; Chiari, L.; Horak, F.B. A portable audio-biofeedback system to improve postural control. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2004, 2004, 4799–4802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dozza, M.; Chiari, L.; Hlavacka, F.; Cappello, A.; Horak, F.B. Effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of visual or audio biofeedback for the control of upright stance. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2006, 14, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dozza, M.; Horak, F.B.; Chiari, L. Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 178, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chiari, L.; Dozza, M.; Cappello, A.; Horak, F.B.; Macellari, V.; Giansanti, D. Audio-biofeedback for balance improvement: An accelerometry-based system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 52, 2108–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dozza, M.; Chiari, L.; Horak, F.B. Audio-biofeedback improves balance in patients with bilateral vestibular loss. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005, 86, 1401–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dozza, M.; Chiari, L.; Chan, B.; Rocchi, L.; Horak, F.B.; Cappello, A. Influence of a portable audio-biofeedback device on structural properties of postural sway. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2005, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wall, C., 3rd; Kentala, E. Control of sway using vibrotactile feedback of body tilt in patients with moderate and severe postural control deficits. J. Vestib. Res. 2005, 15, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kadkade, P.P.; Benda, B.J.; Schmidt, P.B.; Wall, C., 3rd. Vibrotactile display coding for a balance prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2003, 11, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kentala, E.; Vivas, J.; Wall, C., 3rd. Reduction of postural sway by use of a vibrotactile balance prosthesis prototype in subjects with vestibular deficits. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2003, 112, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wall, C., 3rd; Weinberg, M.S.; Schmidt, P.B.; Krebs, D.E. Balance prosthesis based on micromechanical sensors using vibrotactile feedback of tilt. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 48, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Islam, M.S.; Lim, S. Vibrotactile feedback in virtual motor learning: A systematic review. Appl. Ergon. 2022, 101, 103694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tannert, I.; Schulleri, K.H.; Michel, Y.; Villa, S.; Johannsen, L.; Hermsdorfer, J.; Lee, D. Immediate Effects of Vibrotactile Biofeedback Instructions on Human Postural Control. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2021, 2021, 7426–7432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, J.H.; Ling, J.Y.; Hong, J.C.; Yasuda, K.; Muroi, D.; Iwata, H. Investigation of optimal gait speed for motor learning of walking using the vibro-tactile biofeedback system. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2021, 2021, 4662–4665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, L.; Feng, Y.; Chen, B.; Wang, Q.; Wei, K. Improving postural stability among people with lower-limb amputations by tactile sensory substitution. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2021, 18, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iosa, M.; Bini, F.; Marinozzi, F.; Fusco, A.; Morone, G.; Koch, G.; Martino Cinnera, A.; Bonnì, S.; Paolucci, S. Stability and Harmony of Gait in Patients with Subacute Stroke. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2016, 36, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tramontano, M.; Morone, G.; Curcio, A.; Temperoni, G.; Medici, A.; Morelli, D.; Caltagirone, C.; Paolucci, S.; Iosa, M. Maintaining gait stability during dual walking task: Effects of age and neurological disorders. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2017, 53, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Iosa, M.; Fusco, A.; Morone, G.; Paolucci, S. Development and decline of upright gait stability. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morone, G.; Maccioni, G.; Giansanti, D. The Newfound Opportunities of Wearable Systems Based on Biofeedback in the Prevention of Falls. Comment on Tanwar et al. Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 172. Healthcare 2022, 10, 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050940

AMA Style

Morone G, Maccioni G, Giansanti D. The Newfound Opportunities of Wearable Systems Based on Biofeedback in the Prevention of Falls. Comment on Tanwar et al. Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 172. Healthcare. 2022; 10(5):940. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050940

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morone, Giovanni, Giovanni Maccioni, and Daniele Giansanti. 2022. "The Newfound Opportunities of Wearable Systems Based on Biofeedback in the Prevention of Falls. Comment on Tanwar et al. Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 172" Healthcare 10, no. 5: 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050940

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop