Assessment of Pregnant Women’s Satisfaction with Model of Care Initiative: Antenatal Care Service at Primary Health Care in Cluster One in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site and Design
2.2. Sample Size
2.3. Sampling Technique
2.4. Data Collection Methods, Instructions Used, and Measurements
2.5. Data Management and Analysis Plan
2.6. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Participants
3.2. Overall Adequate Satisfaction among Participants
3.3. Satisfaction with Provided Services
3.4. Satisfaction with Provided Care
3.5. Satisfaction with Provided Consultation
3.6. Regression Analysis of Satisfaction about Provided Services and Participants Characteristics
3.7. Regression Analysis of Satisfaction about Provided Care and Participants Characteristics
3.8. Regression Analysis of Satisfaction about Provided Consultation and Participant Characteristics
4. Discussion
5. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ANC | Antenatal care |
PHCs | Primary health care centers |
HCWs | Health care workers |
SAR | Saudi riyal |
References
- Catling, C.J.; Medley, N.; Foureur, M.; Ryan, C.; Leap, N.; Teate, A.; Homer, C.S. Group versus Conventional Antenatal Care for Women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ameh, S.; Adeleye, O.A.; Kabiru, C.W.; Agan, T.; Duke, R.; Mkpanam, N.; Nwoha, D. Predictors of Poor Pregnancy Outcomes among Antenatal Care Attendees in Primary Health Care Facilities in Cross River State, Nigeria: A Multilevel Model. Matern. Child Health J. 2016, 20, 1662–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Margolis, S.A.; Al-Marzouqi, S.; Revel, T.; Reed, R.L. Patient Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Services in the United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2003, 15, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Maharani, C.; Afief, D.F.; Weber, D.; Marx, M.; Loukanova, S. Primary Care Physicians’ Satisfaction after Health Care Reform: A Cross-Sectional Study from Two Cities in Central Java, Indonesia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2019, 19, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. National E-Health Strategy. 2021. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/nehs/Pages/The-New-PHC-Systems.aspx (accessed on 10 August 2021).
- El-Gilany, A.H.; Aref, Y. Failure to Register for Antenatal Care at Local Primary Health Care Centers. Ann. Saudi Med. 2000, 20, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Saudi Vision. Health Sector Transformation Program. 2021. Available online: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/v2030/vrps/hstp/ (accessed on 7 March 2021).
- Kaiser, R.; Woodruff, B.A.; Bilukha, O.; Spiegel, P.B.; Salama, P. Using design effetcs from previous cluster surveys to guide sample size calculation in emergency settings. Disasters 2006, 30, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bennett, S.; Woods, T.; Liyanage, W.M.; Smith, D.L. A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. World Health Stat. Q. 1991, 44, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Emiru, A.A.; Alene, G.D.; Debelew, G.T. Women’s Satisfaction with the Quality of Antenatal Care Services Rendered at Public Health Facilities in Northwest Ethiopia: The Application of Partial Proportional Odds Model. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e037085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soliman, F.E.S. Satisfaction of Rural Pregnant Women as Quality Indicator of Provided Antenatal Care. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2015, 5, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Wynne, S.J.; Duarte, R.; de Wildt, G.; Meza, G.; Merriel, A. The Timing and Quality of Antenatal Care Received by Women Attending a Primary Care Centre in Iquitos, Peru: A Facility Exit Survey. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Swart, A.T.; Muller, C.E.; Rabie, T. The Role of Triage to Reduce Waiting Times in Primary Health Care Facilities in the North West Province of South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. Child Health—Mother and Child Health Passport. 2021. Available online: https://cutt.ly/1jmDoQi (accessed on 7 March 2021).
- Ademuyiwa, I.Y.; Opeke, R.O.; Odetola, T.D. Utilisation of Antenatal Care Services as Determinants of Satisfaction and Its Challenges in Lagos, Nigeria. Br. J. Midwifery 2020, 28, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehissan, H.A.; Deen, L.D.A. Assessment of Antenatal Knowledge and Learning Needs of Pregnant Women Attending Primary Health Care Centers in Baghdad. Iraqi J. Community Med. 2019, 32, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Tai, Y.Y.; Lee, C.N.; Kuo, C.H.; Lin, M.W.; Chen, K.Y.; Lin, S.Y.; Li, H.Y. Simplifying the Screening of Gestational Diabetes by Maternal Age plus Fasting Plasma Glucose at First Prenatal Visit: A Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onyeajam, D.J.; Xirasagar, S.; Khan, M.M.; Hardin, J.W.; Odutolu, O. Antenatal Care Satisfaction in a Developing Country: A Cross-Sectional Study from Nigeria. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Montasser NA, E.H.; Helal, R.M.; Megahed, W.M.; Amin, S.K.; Saad, A.M.; Ibrahim, T.R.; Abd Elmoneem, H.M. Egyptian Women’s Satisfaction and Perception of Antenatal Care. Int. J. Trop. Dis. Health 2012, 2, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Task Sharing to Improve Access to Family Planning; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Sodeinde, K.; Onigbogi, O.; Odukoya, O.; Abiodun, O. Knowledge, Utilization and Clients’ Satisfaction with Antenatal Care Services in Primary Health Care Centres, in Ikenne Local Government Area, Ogun State, Nigeria. Ann. Health Res. 2020, 6, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. Infant and Young Child Feeding. 2018. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/infant-and-young-child-feeding/ (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Samuel, G.A.; Ogbu, B.N.; Odunyemi, F.T.; Suberu, A.; George, E.O.; Agaba, L.O. Evaluation of Service-Quality Dimensions during Antenatal Care in Primary Health Care Centers, Southern Kaduna Senatorial District, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2020, 24, 799–804. [Google Scholar]
- Dauletyarova, M.A.; Semenova, Y.M.; Kaylubaeva, G.; Manabaeva, G.K.; Toktabayeva, B.; Zhelpakova, M.S.; Yurkovskaya, O.A.; Tlemissov, A.S.; Antonova, G.; Grjibovski, A.M. Are Kazakhstani Women Satisfied with Antenatal Care? Implementing the WHO Tool to Assess the Quality of Antenatal Services. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fseha, B. Assessment of Mothers Level of Satisfaction with Antenatal Care Services Provided at Alganesh Health Center Shire, North West Tigray, Ethiopia. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2019, 16, 11798–11802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Items | No. | % |
---|---|---|
Overall adequate satisfaction of initial triage assessment | 605 | 93.7 |
Overall adequate satisfaction of investigation, physical examination, and medication | 348 | 53.9 |
Overall adequate consultation | 464 | 71.8 |
Overall adequate satisfaction for HCWs and provided services | 567 | 87.8 |
Variables | Categories | Provided Services | Provided Care | Provided Consultation | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inadequate | Adequate | Inadequate | Adequate | Inadequate | Adequate | |||||||||||
No. | % | No. | % | p-Value | No. | % | No. | % | p-Value | No. | % | No. | % | p-Value | ||
Age groups (years) | ≤25 years | 23 | 29.1 | 138 | 24.3 | 0.501 | 75 | 25.2 | 86 | 24.7 | 0.003 | 48 | 26.4 | 113 | 24.4 | 0.546 |
26–35 years | 43 | 54.4 | 309 | 54.5 | 145 | 48.7 | 207 | 59.5 | 93 | 51.1 | 259 | 55.8 | ||||
≥36 years | 13 | 16.5 | 120 | 21.2 | 78 | 26.2 | 55 | 15.8 | 41 | 22.5 | 92 | 19.8 | ||||
Education | Basic | 17 | 21.5 | 98 | 17.3 | 0.030 | 84 | 28.2 | 31 | 8.9 | <0.000 | 47 | 25.8 | 68 | 14.7 | <0.000 |
Secondary | 26 | 32.9 | 276 | 48.7 | 107 | 35.9 | 195 | 56.0 | 61 | 33.5 | 241 | 51.9 | ||||
University | 36 | 45.6 | 193 | 34.0 | 107 | 35.9 | 122 | 35.1 | 74 | 40.7 | 155 | 33.4 | ||||
Monthly income | SAR ≤ 4900 | 19 | 24.1 | 196 | 34.6 | 0.072 | 95 | 31.9 | 120 | 34.5 | 0.001 | 67 | 36.8 | 148 | 31.9 | 0.045 |
SAR 5000–7000 | 31 | 39.2 | 224 | 39.5 | 102 | 34.2 | 153 | 44.0 | 58 | 31.9 | 197 | 42.5 | ||||
SAR > 7000 | 29 | 36.7 | 147 | 25.9 | 101 | 33.9 | 75 | 21.6 | 57 | 31.3 | 119 | 25.6 | ||||
Number of pregnancies | One pregnancy | 23 | 29.1 | 152 | 26.8 | 0.598 | 79 | 26.5 | 96 | 27.6 | 0.000 | 55 | 30.2 | 120 | 25.9 | 0.058 |
2–3 pregnancies | 42 | 53.2 | 286 | 50.4 | 127 | 42.6 | 201 | 57.8 | 79 | 43.4 | 249 | 53.7 | ||||
≥4 pregnancies | 14 | 17.7 | 129 | 22.8 | 92 | 30.9 | 51 | 14.7 | 48 | 26.4 | 95 | 20.5 | ||||
First visit to the PHC | Yes | 30 | 38.0 | 223 | 39.3 | 0.817 | 150 | 50.3 | 103 | 29.6 | 0.000 | 82 | 45.1 | 171 | 36.9 | 0.055 |
No | 49 | 62.0 | 344 | 60.7 | 148 | 49.7 | 245 | 70.4 | 100 | 54.9 | 293 | 63.1 |
Variables | Categories | n Adequate | Not Adequate | UAOR | 95% CI | AOR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provided services | |||||||
Age groups (years) | ≤25 years | 138 | 23 | 0.751 | 0.327–1.727 | - | - |
26–35 years | 309 | 43 | 0.865 | 0.421–1.778 | - | - | |
≥36 years | 120 | 13 | Reference | - | |||
Education | Basic | 98 | 17 | 0.483–1.758 | 1.075 | 0.575–2.011 | |
Secondary | 276 | 26 | 1.041–3.136 | 1.980 | 1.157–3.387 | ||
University | 193 | 36 | Reference | - | - | - | |
Monthly income | SAR ≤ 4900 | 196 | 19 | 1.035–3.666 | - | - | |
SAR 5000–7000 | 224 | 31 | 0.775–2.395 | - | - | ||
SAR > 7000 | 147 | 29 | Reference | - | - | - | |
Number of Pregnancies | One pregnancy | 152 | 23 | 0.725 | 0.321–1.636 | - | - |
2–3 pregnancies | 286 | 42 | 0.731 | 0.355–1.502 | - | - | |
≥4 pregnancies | 129 | 14 | Reference | - | - | - | |
First visit to the PHC | Yes | 223 | 30 | 0.708–1.939 | - | - | |
No | 344 | 49 | Reference | - | - | - | |
Provided care | |||||||
Age groups (years) | ≤25 years | 86 | 75 | 1.126 | 0.641–1.979 | - | - |
26–35 years | 207 | 145 | 1.338 | 0.830–2.155 | - | - | |
≥36 years | 55 | 78 | Reference | - | - | - | |
Education | Basic | 31 | 84 | 0.372 | 0.224–0.617 | 0.365 | 0.220–0.605 |
Secondary | 195 | 107 | 1.521 | 1.049–2.205 | 1.503 | 1.038–2.175 | |
University | 122 | 107 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
Monthly income | SAR ≤ 4900 | 120 | 95 | 1.448 | 0.938–2.236 | 1.456 | 0.943–2.247 |
SAR 5000–7000 | 153 | 102 | 1.610 | 1.056–2.455 | 1.618 | 1.061–2.466 | |
SAR > 7000 | 75 | 101 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
Number of Pregnancies | One pregnancy | 96 | 79 | 1.892 | 1.099–3.257 | 2.019 | 1.245–3.271 |
2–3 pregnancies | 201 | 127 | 2.238 | 1.391–3.600 | 2.449 | 1.589–3.776 | |
≥4 pregnancies | 51 | 92 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
First visit to the PHC | Yes | 103 | 150 | 0.477 | 0.338–0.675 | 0.471 | 0.334–0.665 |
No | 245 | 148 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
Provided consultation | |||||||
Age groups (years) | ≤25 years | 113 | 48 | 0.969 | 0.534–1.757 | - | - |
26–35 years | 259 | 93 | 1.052 | 0.640–1.728 | - | - | |
≥36 years | 92 | 41 | Reference | - | - | - | |
Education | Basic | 68 | 47 | 0.747 | 0.464–1.204 | 0.734 | 0.456–1.180 |
Secondary | 241 | 61 | 1.885 | 1.258–2.825 | 1.899 | 1.269–2.842 | |
University | 155 | 74 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
Monthly income | SAR ≤ 4900 | 148 | 67 | 0.902 | 0.578–1.407 | 0.911 | 0.584–1.421 |
SAR 5000–7000 | 197 | 58 | 1.422 | 0.910–2.221 | 1.457 | 0.935–2.270 | |
SAR > 7000 | 119 | 57 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
Number of Pregnancies | One pregnancy | 120 | 55 | 1.006 | 0.574–1.762 | 0.972 | 0.597–1.585 |
2–3 pregnancies | 249 | 79 | 1.490 | 0.909–2.442 | 1.506 | 0.965–2.352 | |
≥4 pregnancies | 95 | 48 | Reference | - | Reference | - | |
First visit to the PHC | yes | 171 | 82 | 0.838 | 0.583–1.205 | - | - |
no | 293 | 100 | Reference | - | - | - |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alhaqbani, S.M.; Bawazir, A.A. Assessment of Pregnant Women’s Satisfaction with Model of Care Initiative: Antenatal Care Service at Primary Health Care in Cluster One in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Healthcare 2022, 10, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010151
Alhaqbani SM, Bawazir AA. Assessment of Pregnant Women’s Satisfaction with Model of Care Initiative: Antenatal Care Service at Primary Health Care in Cluster One in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Healthcare. 2022; 10(1):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010151
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlhaqbani, Saad M., and Amen A. Bawazir. 2022. "Assessment of Pregnant Women’s Satisfaction with Model of Care Initiative: Antenatal Care Service at Primary Health Care in Cluster One in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia" Healthcare 10, no. 1: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010151
APA StyleAlhaqbani, S. M., & Bawazir, A. A. (2022). Assessment of Pregnant Women’s Satisfaction with Model of Care Initiative: Antenatal Care Service at Primary Health Care in Cluster One in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Healthcare, 10(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010151