Abstract
This paper deals with well-known weak homotopy equivalences that relate homotopy colimits of small categories and simplicial sets. We show that these weak homotopy equivalences have stronger cohomology-preserving properties than for local coefficients.
    MSC:
                18G30; 18G60; 55U10; 55U35
            1. Introduction
Since the 1980 paper by Thomason [], we know that the categories , of simplicial sets, and , of small categories, are equivalent from a homotopical point of view. Indeed, there are several basic functorial constructions by which one can pass freely between these categories, preserving all the homotopy invariants of their objects and morphisms. For instance, we have the functor  which assigns to each small category  its nerve , and the functor  sending each simplicial set X to its category of simplices .
Nevertheless, there are interesting algebraic constructions, both on simplicial sets and on small categories, that are not invariants of their homotopy type. This is the case for Gabriel–Zisman cohomology groups  ([] Appendix II), of simplicial sets X with arbitrary coefficient systems on them, that is, with coefficients in abelian group valued functors . Recall from Quillen ([] II §3, Prop. 4) that a simplicial map  is a weak homotopy equivalence if and only if it induces an equivalence of fundamental groupoids , as well isomorphisms , for all , whenever  is a local coefficient system on X, that is, whenever  is a morphism-inverting functor or, equivalently, if  is actually an abelian group valued functor on the fundamental groupoid of X. Similarly, Baues–Wirsching cohomology groups [], of a small category  with coefficients in natural systems on it, that is, with coefficients in abelian group valued functors on its category of factorizations , are homotopy invariants of  only for local coefficients .
There are, however, some particular weak homotopy equivalences that have a stronger conservation property of cohomology than for local coefficients. For instance, for any small category , the morphism between end vertices functor is a weak homotopy equivalence of categories which induces isomorphisms  for any natural system of coefficients  on . The aim of this paper is to prove that two relevant and well-known weak homotopy equivalences have similar strong cohomology-preserving properties. These come respectively associated to diagrams of small categories and simplicial sets. The first of them arises from the seminal Homotopy Colimit Theorem by Thomason ([] Theorem 1.2). This theorem states that, for any indexing small category  and any functor , there is a natural weak homotopy equivalence of simplicial sets
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      between the homotopy colimit of the -diagram of simplicial sets , obtained by applying the nerve construction  to each category , and the nerve of the category obtained by applying the Grothendieck construction on F, see (9) below for details. Thus, the Grothendieck construction on a diagram of small categories represents its homotopy colimit with respect to the Thomason model structure in  []. Since one easily sees that the simplicial map  induces an isomorphism between the associated fundamental groupoids  (see ([] p. 95)), Thomason’s theorem is actually equivalent to the fact that  induces isomorphisms
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      for every local coefficient system  on the category . We prove here the following stronger result.
Theorem 1. 
For any natural system , the isomorphisms (Equation (1)) hold.
The proof we give of this theorem is independent of that given by Thomason in [] of his Homotopy Colimit Theorem, so that this latter appears now as a consequence.
Going in the opposite direction, we also consider diagrams of simplicial sets. For any functor , there is a known natural weak homotopy equivalence in 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      between the category of simplices of the homotopy colimit of G and the Grothendieck construction on the diagram of small categories , obtained by applying the category of simplices construction  to each simplicial set , see Equation (29) below for details. Then, for any local coefficient system , the functor  induces isomorphisms
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Our second main result in the paper is the following.
Theorem 2. 
For any coefficient system , the isomorphisms (Equation (2)) hold.
We show several consequences of the above theorems. For instance, given a functor  and a natural system  on , for any morphism  in , there is an induced natural system  on the category . We describe a first quadrant spectral sequence
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      where  is the natural system on  that assigns to each morphism  the cohomology group . This spectral sequence reduces to that constructed by Pirashvili–Redondo in ([] Theorem 5.2) when the natural system of coefficients  is h-local (see also Gálvez–Neumann–Tonks ([] Theorem 2.5) and ([] Theorem 2.16)). In the other direction, given a functor , for a coefficient system  on  and an object c of , there is an induced coefficient system  on the simplicial set . We describe a Bousfield–Kan type first quadrant spectral sequence (cf. ([] XII, 4.5, 5.8))
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      where  is the functor that assigns to each object c of  the cohomology group . Various invariance results appears here as corollaries. Some of them are already known, such as the Invariance Theorem by Moerdijk–Svensson ([] Theorem 2.3), but others are new. For example, if  are diagrams of categories and  a natural transformation such that every functor , , is a weak homotopy equivalence having the Baues–Wirsching cohomology-preserving property, then the induced  is also a weak homotopy equivalence with the same cohomology-preserving property.
The plan of the paper is simple. After this introductory section, the preliminary Section 2 comprises some notations and a brief review of notions and facts concerning cohomology of small categories and simplicial sets, and Section 3 and Section 4 are essentially dedicated to proving Theorems 1 and 2 above, respectively. Although the proofs of both theorems follow a similar strategy, they are independent.
2. Preliminaries
This section aims to make this paper as self-contained as possible; hence, at the same time as fixing notations and terminology, we review some needed constructions and facts concerning cohomology of small categories and simplicial sets.
Throughout the paper, the composition of maps between sets, homomorphisms between abelian groups, and functors between categories, is written by juxtaposition. The composition of arrows in any abstract small category  is denoted by the symbol ∘.
2.1. Cohomology of Small Categories
If  is any small category, then the category of -modules, denoted -Mod, has as objects the abelian group valued functors , with morphisms the natural transformations between them. If  is any -module and  is a morphism in , then we write the associated homomorphism  by .
The category -Mod is abelian. We refer to Mac Lane ([] Chapter IX, §3) for details, but recall that the set of morphisms between two -modules  and , denoted by , is an abelian group by pointwise addition, that is, if  are morphisms, then  is defined by setting , for each object . The zero -module is the constant functor  defined by the trivial abelian group 0, and a sequence of -modules  is exact if and only if all the induced sequences of abelian groups  are exact.
Furthermore, the category -Mod has enough projective objects. A way to see this is by means of free -modules: There is a forgetful functor , from the category of -modules to the comma category of sets over the set of objects of , which carries a -module  to the disjoint union set
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        endowed with the projection map , given by . If  is any morphism of -modules, then  is defined by . This functor  has a left adjoint, the free -module functor, , which is defined as follows. If  is any set over , then
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is the -module that assigns to each  the free abelian group  with generators all pairs  consisting of an element  together with a morphism  of . We usually write  simply by s, so that each element of  is regarded as an element of . For any morphism  in , the homomorphism  is defined on generators by . Thus, for any generator  of , we have the equality , where  is the homomorphism induced by u. If  is any map of sets over  (so that ), the induced  is the morphism whose component at an object a of  is the homomorphism  such that .
Proposition 1. 
The functor  is left adjoint to the functor . Thus, for  any set over  and any -module , there is a natural isomorphism
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
This follows from the Yoneda Lemma. For any list , the unique morphism of -modules  such that , for all , consists of the homomorphisms , , defined on generators by . □
From the above proposition, it is plain to see that any free -module is projective and, moreover, the counit  is a projective presentation of any -module .
Let
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        be the -module that associates to each  the free abelian group on the generator a, and to each morphism  the isomorphism of abelian groups  such that . This is isomorphic to the constant functor on  defined by the abelian group .
The cohomology groups  of a small category  with coefficients in a -module  (cf., e.g., Gabriel–Zisman [], Illusie [], Roos [], and Watts []), are defined as
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
2.2. Baues–Wirsching Cohomology of Small Categories
If  is any small category, its category of factorizations, , is the category whose objects are the morphisms  in , and whose morphisms  are pairs of morphisms of  such that , that is, making commutative the square below.
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      Composition is given by the formula . The identity arrow at any  is the pair . In [], Baues and Wirsching call such -modules by the name of natural systems on , and they define the cohomology groups  of  with coefficients in a natural system  to be those of its category of factorizations (see ([] Theorem (4.4))): 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Notation: If  is a natural system, for  any two composible arrows in , we denote the induced homomorphisms  and  briefly by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        respectively. Thus, for any composible arrows , the equalities below hold.
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Baues–Wirsching cohomology recovers the cohomology of a small category  with coefficients in -modules, as follows. There is a canonical target functor
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        sending a morphism  in  to . By composing with this functor t, every -module  gives rise to a natural system on , which is equally denoted . This way, every -module  is regarded as a natural system on  and, by ([] Proposition (8.5)), there are natural isomorphisms , so that both Equations (3) and (4), for coefficients in -modules, are the same.
2.3. Cohomology of Simplicial Sets
As usual, let  denote the simplicial category, whose objects are the finite ordered sets , and morphisms the weakly order-preserving maps between them. The coface maps are denoted by , . Recall that these are the injections that omit the ith element. We denote by  the category of simplicial sets. If  is any simplicial set, for any map  in , we write the attached map  by . In particular, the face maps  are denoted by .
The category of simplices of a simplicial set X is denoted by . This has as objects the pairs  where  and , and an arrow  is map  in  such that . The assignment  is the function on objects of a functor , from the category of simplicial sets to the category of small categories, which carries a simplicial map  to the functor  sending an arrow  of  to the arrow  of .
A coefficient system on a simplicial set X is a -module, that is, a functor . To shorten notation, for an object  of , we usually write  instead of , leaving understood the dimension n of the simplex x. Thus, if  is a morphism in , the associated homomorphism is written as . In particular, for any , we have the coface homomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
The cohomology groups  of a simplicial set X with coefficients -module  are defined to be those of its category of simplices (cf., e.g., Illusie ([] Chapitre VI §3) and Gabriel–Zisman ([] Appendix II)), that is,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Remark 1. 
A -module  is called a local coefficient system on the simplicial set X (see Goerss–Jardine ([] Chapter III §1) and Gabriel–Zisman ([] Appendix II, 4.7)) whenever, for any map  of Δ and any n-simplex x of X, the induced homomorphism  is an isomorphism. A weak homotopy equivalence  induces isomorphisms , provided  is a local coefficient system on X, see Quillen ([] Chapter II, §3, Prop. 4). However, for arbitrary coefficient systems  on a simplicial set X, the cohomology groups  are not invariants of the homotopy type of X.
The standard cochain complex , of a simplicial set X with coefficients in a -module , consists of the abelian groups
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        with coboundary  given by . In Section 4 below (see Corollary 8) there is a proof of the following well-known fact (see Illusie ([] Chapitre VI, (3.4.3))) and Gabriel–Zisman ([] Appendix II, Prop. 4.2).
Fact 1. 
For any coefficient system  on a simplicial set X, there are natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
2.4. The Nerve of a Small Category
We usually regard the ordered sets  of  as categories with only one arrow  whenever , and the maps  in  as functors. The nerve  of any small category  is the simplicial set whose n-simplices are the functors , and the map , induced by a map , is given by . The functor nerve  carries a functor  to the simplicial map  such that .
From now on, we will employ several times the following notation: If  is a functor, then we write  for the morphism . Thus, for any  in , we have
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
The morphism between end vertices functor is denoted by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
This carries any object  of  to the morphism  of , and carries a morphism  of  to the morphism of 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        depicted as below.
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      By composing with this functor e, every natural system  on  produces a coefficient system on the simplicial set , which is denoted also by . In Section 3 below (see Corollary 1) there is a proof of the following well-known fact (cf. Baues–Wirsching ([] Definition (1.4), Theorem (4.4)), Illusie ([] Chapitre VI, (3.4.2)), and Gabriel–Zisman ([] Appendix II, Proposition 3.3)).
Fact 2. 
For any natural system  on a small category , there are natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Let us stress that, after Fact 1, it is implicit in the above Fact 2 that, for any natural system  on , the cohomology groups  can be computed by means of the standard cochain complex , which is denoted in [] by . Thus,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        and the coboundary  is given by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Also, let us point out that the composition of the functors in Equations (7) and (5),
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is just the last vertex functor, which sends each object  of  to the object  of . By composition with it, any -module defines a coefficient system on  and, in this way, Fact 2 applies to the ordinary cohomology groups of  with coefficients in -modules.
Remark 2. 
For a small category , arbitrary coefficient systems on , that is, arbitrary functors , are called Thomason natural systems on  by Gálvez–Carrillo–Neumann–Tonks in [], where the cohomology groups  are denoted by  and studied under the name of Thomason cohomology groups of the category.
3. On the Weak Equivalence
Throughout this section,  denotes a functor, where  is a small category. For a morphism  of , we write  for the functor . Thus, for any n-simplex  of , that is, for any functor , we have functors (see Equation (6) for the notation)
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
3.1. The Involved Constructions
By composing F with the nerve functor, we get a diagram of simplicial sets , whose homotopy colimit ([] Chapter XII, §5) is denoted by . This simplicial set has as n-simplices pairs of functors , where  and  and, for any map  in , the induced  acts by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, its face operators are given by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
On the other hand, the Grothendieck construction [,,] on the diagram F yields a small category, denoted by , whose objects are pairs  where a is an object of  and x is an object of . A morphism form  to  in  is a pair  with  a morphism in  and  a morphism in . Arrows in  compose by the formula
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
The Thomason weak equivalence ([] Theorem 1.2) is the simplicial map
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        which carries an n-simplex  of the homotopy colimit to the n-simplex of the nerve of the Grothendieck construction  defined by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
3.2. A Free Resolution of the Natural System over
The following construction is key for our main result in this section.
Let  be the simplicial replacement construction of Bousfield–Kan ([] Chapter XII, §5) on : that is, the bisimplicial set
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        whose -simplices are pairs of functors  where  and . If  and  are maps in , the induced maps
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are defined on a -simplex  as above by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, its face operators  act by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Now, for each integers , let the set  be endowed with the morphism between end vertices map , defined by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        and let  be the corresponding free -module (i.e., free natural system on ). Thus, for each morphism  in ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is the free abelian group with generators the sextuples , where
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        such that
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Note that the latter equations mean that the square in the category  below commutes.
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      For any three composible morphisms in ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        the induced homomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are, respectively, given on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
These  provide a bisimplicial natural system on 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        where, for any maps in the simplicial category,  and , the induced  and  are the morphisms whose respective components at a morphism  of  are the homomorphisms  and  respectively defined on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, the horizontal and vertical face homomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        act on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Let  be the complex associated to the simplicial natural system diagonal of : that is, the cochain complex of natural systems on  with , and whose differential , at a morphism  of , is given on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Lemma 1. 
 is a projective resolution of the natural system  on . Therefore, for any natural system  on ,
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
Let us write  as in Equation (11). Let  be the morphism of natural systems whose component , at a morphism  of , is the homomorphism defined on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          where we have identified any object  of  with the functor  such that  and, similarly, an object  of  with the functor  with . It is easily seen that this morphism  determines an augmentation .
Since every natural system  is free, whence projective, it suffices to prove that, for any morphism  of , the augmented chain complex of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          is exact. To do this, let us fix such a morphism  and proceed as follows.
For each , let  be the free abelian group on the set of triples  consisting of a functor  and morphisms  and  of  with , that is, making commutative the square
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      These  define a simplicial abelian group , where each map  of  induces the homomorphism  defined on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, its face homomorphisms  are defined by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
This simplicial abelian group  can be endowed with an augmentation over  by the homomorphism  which acts on generators by . Let us also denote by  the associated chain complex, in which the differentials  are obtained by taking alternating sums. The resulting augmented chain complex of abelian groups admits a contracting homotopy k
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          whence it is exact. Such a contraction k is given by the homomorphisms  and ,  which act on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      In the above formula, for any functor  and any morphism , the functor  is defined by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
To check that  is actually a chain homotopy, we first observe the equalities
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
From these, it is not hard to see that the operators  satisfy the equations
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          whence the equality  follows for all .
Consider now the simplicial abelian group  as a bisimplicial abelian group which is constant in the horizontal direction. Then, the homomorphisms  defined on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          determine a bisimplicial homomorphism . For every , the associated augmented chain complex of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          is exact, because of it admits a contracting homotopy h given by the homomorphisms  and  which act on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          where, for any functor  and any morphism , the functor  is defined by the formulas
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      As above, to check that h is actually a contracting chain homotopy, we first observe the equalities
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
From these, we see that the operators  satisfy the equations
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          whence the equality  follows.
Let us now consider the category of simplices , whose objects are triples , where  and  are functors, and whose morphisms  are those maps  in  such that  and . We have the composite functor ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        of the functor  induced by Thomason simplicial map Equation (9) with the morphism between end vertices functor e Equation (7). This functor  carries each object  to the morphism of 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        and a morphism , as above, to the morphism of the category of factorizations  given by the broken arrows below.
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      Then, by composition with , any natural system  on  gives rise to a coefficient system, denoted by , on the simplicial set . As a main result in this paper, we have
Theorem 3. 
For any natural system  on , the Thomason map η in Equation (9) induces isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
For any given natural system  on , the coefficient system  on the homotopy colimit  carries an n-simplex  to the abelian group
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          and, for any map  in the simplicial category, the induced homomorphism  is the homomorphism
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, for any n-simplex  of , the coface homomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          are
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Then, the standard cochain complex  consists of the abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          with coboundary  given by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Now, let  be the bisimplicial natural system in Equation (11). By Proposition 1, for every , there is an isomorphism of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          which carries any n-cochain  to the morphism of natural systems  whose component at every morphism  of  is the homomorphism of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
These morphisms  fit together to define an isomorphism of cochain complexes
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In effect, for any , any morphism  of , and any generator  of , we have
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Hence, the result follows from Lemma 1 and Fact 1 (=Corollary 8 below). □
Theorem 3 above is actually a natural generalization of the useful and well-known result below, already presented as Fact 2 in the preliminary Section 2.
Corollary 1. 
Let  be a small category. For any natural system  on , there are natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
Let us specialize Theorem 3 to the case when  is the constant functor defined by the only-one-arrow category . In this case, , , and the Thomason simplicial map Equation (9), , is the identity map on . Therefore, Theorem 3 just says that, for any natural system  on , there are isomorphisms . □
Particular cases of the following corollary have been used several times in homological algebra to compute cohomology of semidirect products of groups or monoids, diagrams of groups, etc. (see, e.g., Cegarra [,]), by means of certain chain complexes more manageable than the standard ones.
Let  be the bisimplicial natural system on  in Equation (11), and let  be any given natural system on . By Proposition 1, there is a natural isomorphism of bicosimplicial abelian groups
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        where  is the bicosimplicial abelian group described as follows: for every integers ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        and, for any maps  and  in the simplicial category, the induced homomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are defined by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, its horizontal and vertical coface homomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are given by the formulas
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Define the non-standard cochain complex of  with coefficients in a natural system  to be , the total cochain complex of the associated double cochain complex to . Thus, it consists of the abelian groups
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        with coboundary  given by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Corollary 2. 
For any natural system  on , there are natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
From the descriptions of the bicomplex  in Equations (18) and (17) and the complex  in Equations (19)–(21), a straightforward comparison shows that . Then the result follows from Theorem 3, since both cochain complexes  and  are cohomology equivalent by the generalized Eilenberg–Zilber theorem of Dold and Puppe (see, e.g., Goerss–Jardine ([] Chapter IV, Theorem 2.4)). □
Spectral sequences for the cohomology of the Grotendieck construction are implicit in the above corollary. Let  be a natural system on . Every arrow  in  determines a functor between the categories of factorizations
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        which acts on objects by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        and on morphisms by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      Then, by composition with , the natural system  on the Grothendieck construction gives rise to a natural system on the category , denoted by , so that the cohomology groups
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are defined. For any integer , there is a natural system on ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        which acts on morphisms as follows: For any morphism  in ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        one has the natural transformation 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        whose component at a morphism  of  is the morphism of 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        depicted as
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      
      
      Then, the induced homomorphism
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is the composite of the homomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Corollary 3. 
For any natural system  on  there is a natural first quadrant spectral sequence
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
where  is the natural system on  defined in Equation (24).
Proof.  
Let  be the double cochain complex associated to the bicosimplicial abelian group in Equation (19). Fixing any , and taking homology in the vertical complex , we have
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Taking now the cohomology again, we have , whence the result follows from Corollary 2. □
Note that, when  is the identity arrow of any object b of , then functor  in (22) is the induced one on the category of factorizations by the canonical inclusion functor
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
So, in this case, we can write the corresponding cohomology group Equation (23) simply as . For any , we have the -module
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        which carries every morphism  to the composite homomorphism
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        where 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is the natural transformation defined, at any object x of , by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      There is, for any integer , a morphism of natural systems on 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        where, recall, the -module  is regarded as a natural system by composition with the target functor  in Equation (5). Its component at any morphism  in  is the homomorphism
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        induced by the natural transformation ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        which is defined on any morphism  of  by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      
      Following to Pirsahvili–Redondo [], we say that the natural system  is h-local provided the morphism  in Equation (27) is an isomorphism, for all . This means that, for any arrow  in , the cochain map 
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is a homology isomorphism. We call the natural system local whenever the natural transformations  induces an isomorphism  of natural systems on , that is, if for any  in ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        is an isomorphism (note that this condition is a bit weaker than the corresponding one stated in []). Clearly every local natural system on  is h-local, as well as every -module is a local natural system. The spectral sequence by Pirsahvili–Redondo in ([] Theorem 5.2) (cf. also Gálvez–Neumann–Tonks ([] Theorem 2.5)) and ([] Theorem 2.16)) appears now as a particular case of the spectral sequence in the above Corollary 3.
      Corollary 4. 
For any h-local natural system  on  there is a natural spectral sequence
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
where  is the natural system on  defined in Equation (26).
The spectral sequence in Corollary 3 involves some invariance results, as we show below.
Corollary 5. 
Let  be functors, let  be a natural transformation, and let  be a natural system on . If, for any arrow  in , the functor  induces isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
then the functor  also induces isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
For any arrow  of , the square
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          commutes. Therefore  induces isomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      Since these are natural in u, it follows that  induces an isomorphism of natural systems on  between  and . Then, for any integers , there are natural isomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          and the result follows from the spectral sequences in Corollary 3 for F and  and  and , respectively. □
Recall now that a functor  is called a twisted system of coefficients on the diagram of categories  whenever, for any object b of ,  is a local system of coefficients on the category ; that is, provided that, for any arrow  in , the induced  is an isomorphism, see ([] Definition 2.1). The following invariance result was proved by Moerdijk–Svensson in ([] Theorem 2.3).
Corollary 6. 
Let  be functors. Suppose  is a natural transformation such that all the functors , , are weak homotopy equivalences of categories. Then, for any twisted system of coefficients  on F, ν induces natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
For any twisted system of coefficients  on F, the induced homomorphisms  are isomorphisms. Since, for any  in , we have , the hypothesis of Corollary 5 above hold, whence the result follows. □
The following terminology is suggested by T. Pirashvili.
Definition 1. 
A weak homotopy equivalence of categories  is a Baues–Wirsching weak homotopy equivalence (resp. a Roos–Watts weak homotopy equivalence) provided that, for any natural system  on  (resp. -module), the induced homomorphisms , , are all isomorphisms.
For instance, if  is any functor with a left or right adjoint, then it is a Baues–Wirsching weak homotopy equivalence. This fact follows from ([] Lemma 1.5, p. 10). See also ([] Lemma 2.2), ([] Corollary 2.3), and ([] Corollary 4.3).
Corollary 7. 
Let  be functors. Suppose  is a natural transformation such that all the functors , , are Baues–Wirsching (resp. Roos–Watts) weak homotopy equivalences, then  also is.
Proof.  
This follows from Corollary 5. □
4. On the Weak Equivalence
Throughout this section,  is a small category and  is a functor. For any morphism  of , we write  for the simplicial map . Since  is simplicial, for any map  in , we have , that is, the square below commutes.
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      In particular, every functor  gives rise to the simplicial maps, see Equation (6),
      
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
4.1. The Involved Constructions
The simplicial replacement of G of Bousfield–Kan ([] Chapter XII, §5) produces the bisimplicial set
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        whose -simplices are pairs  where  is a functor and  is a q-simplex of . If  and  are maps in , the induced maps
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are respectively defined on any -simplex  as above by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, its horizontal and vertical face maps  act by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
The homotopy colimit construction on G is the simplicial set
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Its n-simplices are then pairs  where  is a functor and . If  is any map in , then the induced map  acts by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, its face maps are given by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
On the other hand, by composing G with the category of simplices functor , we get a diagram of categories  on which we can apply the Grothendieck construction. This yields the small category
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        whose objects are triples , where , , and  is a n-simplex of . A morphism  consists of morphisms , of , and , of , such that . Composition in  is given by .
Let  be the category of simplices of the homotopy colimit of G. Its objects are triples , where  is a functor and . Its morphisms  are those maps  in  such that  and . We have the functor
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        which is defined on objects by , and on morphisms  by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
4.2. A Projective Resolution of the -module
To shorten some expressions, if  is any -module and  is an object of , then we write  for , leaving understood the dimension n of the simplex x of .
Let  be as in Equation (28). For any integers , let the set  be equipped with the map
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        and let  be the associated free -module. Thus, for each object  of ,  is the free abelian group on the set of lists  consisting of a functor , a simplex , a map  in , and a morphism  in , such that . Equivalently, we can take
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        the free abelian group on the set of triples  consisting of a functor , a morphism  in , and a map  in . If  is any morphism of the category , then the induced homomorphism  is given on generators by .
These  provide us of a bisimplicial -module
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        in which, for any maps  and  in the simplicial category, the induced morphisms at any object  of ,
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are the homomorphisms acting on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, the horizontal and vertical face homomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        are defined on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Let  be the complex associated to the simplicial -module diagonal of . Thus,  and, at any object  of , the differential  is given on generators by
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Lemma 2. 
 is a projective resolution of the -module . Hence, for any -module ,
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
Let us write  as in Equation (31). There is an augmentation  which, at any object  of , is given by the homomorphism
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          that carries all generators  of  to the generator  of . Since every -module  is free, whence projective, it suffices to prove that, for any object  of , the augmented chain complex of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          is exact. To do this, let us fix any such  and proceed as follows.
Let  be the standard simplicial n-simplex, and let us consider the simplicial abelian group , , as a bisimplicial abelian group which is constant in the horizontal direction. Then, a bisimplicial homomorphism  is given by the homomorphisms  defined on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          where we have identified any object  of  with the functor  such that . For any , the associated augmented chain complex of abelian groups admits a contracting homotopy k
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          whence it is exact. Such a homotopy k is given by the homomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          which act on generators by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          where, for any  and ,  is defined as in Equation (15). It follows from Dold–Puppe Theorem that the induced map on the associated augmented diagonal complexes ,
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          is a homology isomorphism. Then, the exactness of Equation (33) follows from the exactness of the augmented chain complex at the bottom in the above diagram, as it has a contracting homotopy given by the homomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          which are defined on generators as follows:  is the map , and, for any ,  is the map  and . □
      
      By composing with the functor  in Equation (29), every -module  gives rise to a coefficient system  on , and we have
Theorem 4. 
For any -module , there are natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Proof.  
Let  be any given -module. As we did before, for any object  of  we write  instead of , and also, for any morphism  of  we write
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          for the induced homomorphism . Similarly, for  any map in , we write
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          by the homomorphism . Thus, we have the equalities
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          that is, both inner triangles in the diagram below commutes.
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
      The induced coefficient system  on  carries an n-simplex  to the abelian group  and, for any map  in , the attached  is the homomorphism
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In particular, the cofaces  are the homomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Then, the standard cochain complex  consists of the abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          with coboundary  given by
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Now, let  be the bisimplicial -module in Equation (31). By Proposition 1, there are isomorphisms of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          which carry an m-cochain  to the morphism of -modules  given, at any object  of , by the homomorphism of abelian groups
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
These  fit together to define an isomorphism of cochain complexes
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
In effect, for any , any object  of , and any generator  of , we have
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Hence, the result follows from Lemma 2. □
Let X be a simplicial set. When we specialize Theorem 4 above to the case when  is the only-one-arrow category and  the functor with , then , the simplicial set X, , the category of simplices of X, and the comparison functor (Equation (29)), , is the identity on . Therefore, we obtain the following well-known result, already mentioned in Section 2 as Fact 1.
Corollary 8. 
For any simplicial set X and any -module , there are natural isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Returning to the general case, if  is any -module, we have are natural isomorphisms
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        whence our second main result in the paper follows
Corollary 9. 
The functor μ in Equation (29) is a Roos–Watts weak homotopy equivalence; that is, for any -module , μ induces isomorphisms
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
Remark 3. 
For any -module , the spectral sequence in Corollary 4 can be written as
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
where  is the -module assigning to each object b of  the q-th cohomology group of the simplicial set  with coefficients in the -module obtained by restriction of  via the inclusion functor  (25).
Remark 4. 
Let us say that a weak homotopy equivalence of simplicial sets  is Gabriel–Zisman weak homotopy equivalence provided that, for any coefficient system  on Y, the induced  are isomorphisms for all . That is, whenever  is a Roos–Watts weak homotopy equivalence. The invariance result in Corollary 7, tell us that if  is a natural transformation between diagrams of simplicial sets , such that every , , is a Gabriel–Zisman weak homotopy equivalence, then the induced functor  is a Roos–Watts weak homotopy equivalence (cf. Moerdijk–Svensson ([] Corollary 2.5)).
Finally, it is worth noting that both Theorem 3 and Corollary 9 can be useful in combination. For example, for any diagram of categories , there is a canonical functor
        
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
        induced by the natural transformation , whose component at any object , is the last vertex functor , see Equation (8). We now can prove
Corollary 10. 
For any functor , the functor L above is a Roos–Watts weak homotopy equivalence.
Proof.  
We know that every last vertex functor  is a weak homotopy equivalence (see, e.g., Illusie ([] Chapitre VI, Thèormé 3.3)). Then, the functor L is also a weak homotopy equivalence by Thomason ([] Corollary 3.3.1). Furthermore, since the square of functors
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
    
          commutes, for any -module , the induced homomorphisms  are the composite of the isomorphisms
          
      
        
      
      
      
      
     □
      Funding
This research received external funding from FQM-379: Algebra y Teoría de la Información.
Acknowledgments
The author is much indebted to the anonymous referees, whose useful observations greatly improved our exposition.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Thomason, R.W. Cat as a closed model category. Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques 1980, 21, 305–324. [Google Scholar]
 - Gabriel, P.; Zisman, M. Calculus of Fractions and Homotopy Theory; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1967. [Google Scholar]
 - Quillen, D. Homotopical algebra, Lecture Notes in Math; Springer: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1967; Volume 34. [Google Scholar]
 - Baues, H.J.; Wirsching, G. The cohomology of small categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 1985, 38, 187–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Thomason, R.W. Homotopy colimits in the category of small categories. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1979, 85, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Pirashvili, T.; Redondo, M.J. Cohomology of the Grothendieck construction. Manuscripta Math. 2006, 120, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
 - Gálvez-Carrillo, I.; Neumann, F.; Tonks, A. André spectral sequences for Baues–Wirsching cohomology of categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2012, 216, 2549–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Gálvez-Carrillo, I.; Neumann, F.; Tonks, A. Thomason cohomology of categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2013, 217, 2163–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
 - Bousfield, A.; Kan, D.M. Homotopy Limits, Completions and Localizations; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1972; Volume 304. [Google Scholar]
 - Moerdijk, I.; Svensson, J.-A. A Shapiro lemma for diagrams of spaces with applications to equivariant topology. Compos. Math. 1995, 96, 249–282. [Google Scholar]
 - Mac Lane, S. Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd ed.; GTM 5; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
 - Illusie, L. Complex Cotangent et Déformations II; Lecture Notes in Math. 283; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1972. [Google Scholar]
 - Roos, J.-E. Sur les foncteurs dérivés de . Applications. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1961, 252, 3702–3704. [Google Scholar]
 - Watts, C.E. A homology theory for small categories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra, La Jolla 1965; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1966; pp. 331–336. [Google Scholar]
 - Goerss, P.G.; Jardine, J.F. Simplicial Homotopy Theory; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
 - Grothendieck, A. Catégories fibrées et descente. Exposé VI in Revtêments étales et groupe fondamental, SGA1 (1960-61). In Documents Mathématiques; Societé Matheématique de France: Paris, France, 2003; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
 - Carrasco, P.; Cegarra, A.M.; Garzón, A.R. Classifying spaces for braided monoidal categories and lax diagrams of bicategories. Adv. Math. 2011, 226, 419–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Cegarra, A.M. Cohomology of diagrams of groups. The classification of (co)fibred categorical groups. Int. Math. J. 2003, 3, 643–680. [Google Scholar]
 - Cegarra, A.M. Equivariant Brauer groups and cohomology. J. Algebra 2006, 296, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
 - Franjou, V.; Friedlander, E.M.; Pirashvili, T.; Schwartz, L. Rational Representations, the Steenrod Algebra and Functor Homology; Panoramas et Synthéses; SociétéMathématique de France: Paris, France, 2003; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
 - Muro, F. On the functoriality of cohomology of categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2006, 204, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
 
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
