Abstract
In this paper, we study the periodic orbits of a type of odd order differential delay system with lags via the index theory and the variational method. This type of system has not been studied by others. Our results provide a new and more accurate method for counting the number of periodic orbits.
1. Introduction
The delay differential equations have useful applications in various fields such as age-structured population growth, life sciences, control theory, and any model involving responses with non-zero delays [1,2].
The problem of periodic solutions for multi-delay differential equations started from the research work of Kaplan and Yorke [3] in 1974. Consider the following differential delay equation
in which . They proved the existence of the periodic solutions of (1) when and , respectively. In the subsequent literatures [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], the number of 2 (n + 1)-periodic solutions of Equation (1) was studied by using the results of Nussbaum [18]. In 1998, Li and He [15] made some researches for (1) by use of the theory of symmetric group. Especially, in 2006, Fei used the variational method to study the number of periodic solutions of Equation (1). He studied the cases of and respectively in literature [4,5] since the specific research methods and details vary greatly. Almost at the same time, Guo and Yu [13] applied critical point theories to study the multiplicity of the 4-periodic solutions for (1) when . After then they [12] studied the same problem for (1) when which is an extension of Fei’s article [4] but the proof of theorem is more difficult and more complicated. In addition, all of these researches are about first order differential equations and did not give the precise counting method for the number of periodic solutions.
The goal of this paper is to study the periodic orbits to a type of odd order differential delay system in the form
where
and there are real symmetric matrices such that
The method applied in this paper is the index theory and the variational approach [19,20,21]. The variation structure we built in this paper is simpler compared with [13]. In addition, the counting method for the number of periodic orbits in our results only depends on the eigenvalues of and . So it is more precise and easier to examine.
To facilitate the following discussion, we suppose that
are respectively the eigenvalues of and . Their corresponding unit eigenvectors are respectively . At the same time, the one-dimensional space corresponding to each eigenvector is denoted as
2. Space and Functional
Consider the -periodic orbits of (2), and suppose
Let
and define by
Let
For , define
Therefore, is an space.
In order to facilitate subsequent calculations, we make a more detailed division as follows,
then we have , and let
It is easy to see that, ,
Then, we can get
and
If we have
Obviously is invertible.
According to Theorem 1.4 in [21], the differential of functional is
where It is easy to prove that is compact.
3. Partition of Space and Symbols
Thereby, , , we have
Similarly, , , we have
Hence, define
Then, we have
Thus,
It is easy to see that as then we can get that and
4. Lemmas
Let X be a Hilbert space, be a linear operator, and be a differentiable functional.
Lemma 1.
([4], Lemma 2.4). Assume that there are two closed -invariant linear subspaces, and , and such that
- (a)
- is closed and of finite codimensions in X,
- (b)
- (c)
- there exists such that
- (d)
- there is such that
- (e)
- Φsatisfies -condition, i.e., every sequence with and possesses a convergent subsequence.
ThenΦhas at least generally different critical orbits in if
In addition, we make the following assumptions for convenience,
Lemma 2.
Under the assumptions of and , there exists such that
Proof of Lemma 2.
Let be the orthogonal projection, then . Assuming that , then for , we can get
Then from (12), we can get
For convenience, let
then
in which as .
Furthermore, let and . If , then . It follows that is a finite set and then there exists , such that . In this case, let .
On the other hand, if , then there exists , such that when . Therefore, , such that
In this case, let . Then let , one has .
Similarly, if , one has , such that
Then let , we can get that
when , and
when .
Then let . The inequalities in (14) are proved. □
Lemma 3.
Under the assumptions of and , the functional Φ defined by (9) satisfies -condition.
Proof of Lemma 3.
Let be the orthogonal projections, then .
Assume that is a subsequence such that and is bounded. Then we can get that, , and is bounded. Let . Similarly, when and are bounded. According to (4), we can get that
for some . Thus, from
and (14), we can get
which implies the boundedness of . Then we can get the boundedness of . Similarly, we have the boundedness of . At the same time, is bounded since is finite-dimensional. Therefore, is bounded. It follows from (11) that
Considering the compactness of operator K and the boundedness of , we can get that . Then, we have that
as . Therefore,
which implies -condition. □
Lemma 4.
If x is a critical point ofΦ, then the orbit corresponding to x is a periodic orbit to the system (2).
5. Main Results
From the definition of (13), we can get that there exists , such that
when and . Meanwhile,
when and .
So,
when . Thus, we have
Then, we can get
Denote
Now we give the main results of this paper.
Theorem 1.
Suppose that and hold. Then system (2) possesses at least
-periodic orbits satisfying .
Proof of Theorem 1.
Suppose without loss of generality that
Firstly, it can be seen from (16) that and are finite numbers, which implies that condition (a) in Lemma 1 holds. For each , we have that yields which implies that the condition (b) in Lemma 1 holds.
Moreover, Lemma 3 gives the -condition.
In the following part, we just need to show that conditions (c) and (d) in Lemma 1 hold.
Let be the orthogonal projection. let , then .
The second condition in (4) implies that for some Meanwhile, taking Lemma 2 into account, we can get
if . Clearly, there is such that
On the other hand,
so there exists , such that
Thus, when , we have
So
That is, there are and such that
Then, according to Lemma 1, has at least different -periodic orbits satisfying . □
Furthermore, let
According to the definition of (13), we have
Let
Then, and
when . Therefore,
when .
On the other hand, so
Similarly, so
Hence,
However, the existence of integer d is proved only in theory in the above formulas, and the calculation method is not given, so it is difficult to calculate the specific values of and , causing inconvenience in practical application. So, define
in which
Obviously, . Then when , we can get
Hence,
This leads to the following corollary,
Corollary 1.
Suppose that and hold. Then system (2) possesses at least
geometrically different -periodic orbits satisfying .
Assume that
are respectively the eigenvalues of and . Their corresponding unit eigenvectors in space are respectively and .
Further subdivision, let
, denote
and
Then we can get
Theorem 2.
Suppose that and hold and the differential system (2) can be decomposed into the independent systems shown in (18), then the system (2) possesses at least
geometrically different -periodic orbits satisfying .
Proof of Theorem 2.
Furthermore, when , let
Then for , define
in which . Obviously, . Then when , we have
Hence,
Combining theorem 2 with corollary 1, it is easy to get
6. Example
Example 1.
We study the multiplicity of 8-periodic orbits of the system
in which
In this case,
Then
and .
Let
Then
System (19) can be decomposed into independent systems as follows
Hence, according to corollary 2, we can get
In this case, , then by calculating, we have
and
So, according to corollary 2, system (19) possesses at least geometrically different 8-periodic orbits satisfying .
Author Contributions
Both authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Science Foundations of China grant number 11601493.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the referees for carefully reading the manuscript and for their valuable suggestions, which have significantly improved the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Kolmanovskii, V.; Myshkis, A. Introduction to the Theory and Applications of Functional Differential Equations; Kluver: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, H.L. An Introduction to Delay Differential Equations with Applications to the Life Sciences; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan, J.; Yorke, J. Ordinary differential equations which yield periodic solution of delay equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1974, 48, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, G. Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations via Hamiltonian systems (I). Nonlinear Anal 2006, 65, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, G. Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations via Hamiltonian systems (II). Nonlinear Anal 2006, 65, 40–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Ge, W.; Li, L. Multiple periodic orbits of high-dimensional differential delay systems. Adv. Diff. Equ. 2019, 2019, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, W. Periodic solutions of the differential delay equation x′(t) = −f(x(t − 1)). Acta Math. Sin. (New Ser.) 1996, 12, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, W. On the existence of periodic solutions of differential delay equations with multiple lags. Acta Appl. Math. Sin. 1994, 17, 173–181. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ge, W. Two existence theorems of periodic solutions for differential delay equations. Chin. Ann. Math. 1994, 15, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, W. Oscillatory periodic solutions of differential delay equations with multiple lags. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1997, 42, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, W.; Zhang, L. Multiple periodic solutions of delay differential systems with 2k − 1 lags via variational approach. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2016, 36, 4925–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Yu, J. Multiple results on periodic solutions to higher dimensional differential equations with multiple delays. J. Dyn. Diff. Equ. 2011, 23, 1029–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Yu, J. Multiplicity results for periodic solutions to delay differential equations via critical point theory. J. Differ. Equ. 2005, 218, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Xue, C.; Ge, W. Periodic orbits to Kaplan-Yorke like differential delay equations with two lags of ratio. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 247. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; He, X. Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations created by asymptotically linear Hamiltonian systems. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 1998, 31, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Sun, H.; Ge, W. Multiple Periodic Solutions of Differential Delay Equations with 2k − 1 Lags. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2020, 36, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Sun, H.; Ge, W. On the Number of Periodic Solutions to Kaplan Yorke like High Order Differential Delay Equations with 2 k Lags. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2019, 29, 1950196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nussbaum, R. Periodic solutions of special differential delay equations: An example in nonlinear functional analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Edingb. 1978, 81, 131–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benci, V. On critical point theory for indefinite functionals in the presence of symmetries. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1982, 274, 533–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fannio, L. Multiple periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems with strong resonance at infinity. Discret. Cont. Dyn. Sys. 1997, 3, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mawhen, J.; Willem, M. Critical Point Theory and Hamiltonian Systems; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).