Abstract
In Lorentz–Minkowski space, the angles between any two non-null vectors have been defined in the sense of the angles in Euclidean space. In this work, the angles relating to lightlike vectors are characterized by the Frenet frame of a pseudo null curve and the angles between any two non-null vectors in Minkowski 3-space. Meanwhile, the explicit measuring methods are demonstrated through several examples.
1. Introduction
In Einstein’s theory of relativity, time, together with the three dimension space, constitutes the four-dimension space–time. As one of the important space–time models in theory of relativity, Lorentz–Minkowski space–time is attracting the attentions of many physicians and mathematicians. One of the remarkable things is that some classical research topics with Riemannian metric are generalized into Lorentz–Minkowski space with a pseudo-Riemannian metric [1,2].
The Lorentz–Minkowski metric divides the vectors into timelike, lightlike (null) or spacelike vectors [1]. Due to the causal character of vectors in this space, some simple problems become a little complicated and strange, especially the ones relating to null vectors, such as null curves, pseudo null curves, B-scrolls, marginally trapped surfaces and so on [3,4,5]. One of the reasons is the angles relating to lightlike vectors that cannot be defined properly, which restrict some research, depending on angular measurement to some extent. As far as the authors know, this problem is still in the air at present.
The angles between any two nonzero vectors in Euclidean space can be defined through their scalar product. Naturally, the idea can be moved to Lorentz–Minkowski space. In Lorentz–Minkowski space, the angles between any two non-null vectors have been defined in the light of the angles in Euclidean space [6]. However, the method cannot be taken into the angles relating to lightlike vectors because of the character of lightlike vectors, i.e., the norm of lightlike vectors vanishes everywhere.
Considering the relationship between any two independent lightlike vectors and the existing definitions of angles between any two non-null vectors in Minkowski space, an appropriate method is proposed to define the angles relating to lightlike vectors by the Frenet frame of a pseudo null curve and the angles between any two non-null vectors. In Section 2, some fundamental facts about the pseudo null curves and the definitions of angles between any two non-null vectors are recalled. In Section 3, the angles between a lightlike vector and a spacelike vector, a timelike vector or another lightlike vector which is independent to it are defined, respectively. Last but not least, several examples are given explicitly.
Using the new angular measurement proposed in this paper, a lot of research works can be completed systematically. For example, the helix, k-type slant helix, the curves with constant precession, and the constant angle surfaces, which play important roles in the science of biology and physics, such as analyzing the structure of DNA and characterizing the motion of particles in a magnetic field [7,8]. It is of great significance to study the theory of relativity.
The curves in this paper are regular and smooth unless otherwise stated.
2. Preliminaries
A Minkowski 3-space is provided with the standard flat metric given by
in terms of the natural coordinate system . Recall that a vector v is said to be spacelike, timelike and lightlike (null), if or , and , , respectively. The norm (modulus) of v is defined by . Comparing to the vectors in Euclidean space, the existence of timelike and lightlike vectors gives some particular properties, as follows:
- Two lightlike vectors x and y are linearly dependent if and only if ;
- If x and y are two timelike or lightlike vectors with , then they are lightlike vectors.
Definition 1
([9]). Two vectors in are Lorentz orthogonal if and only if .
For any two vectors , , the exterior product is given by
An arbitrary curve is spacelike, timelike or lightlike if all of its velocity vectors are spacelike, timelike or lightlike. A surface is said to be timelike, spacelike or lightlike if all of its normal vectors are spacelike, timelike or lightlike, respectively. Furthermore, the spacelike curves in can be classified into three kinds according to their principal normal vectors are spacelike, timelike and lightlike, which are called the first and the second kind of spacelike curve and the pseudo null curve, respectively [9]. Among of them, the pseudo null curve is defined as follows:
Definition 2
([10]). A spacelike curve framed by Frenet frame in is called a pseudo null curve, if its principal normal vector β and binormal vector γ are linearly independent lightlike (null) vectors.
Proposition 1
([10]). Let be a pseudo null curve parameterized by arc-length s, i.e., . Then there exists a unique Frenet frame such that
where and In sequence, is called the tangent, principal normal and binormal vector field of , respectively. The function is called the curvature function.
Remark 1.
In some research papers for pseudo null curves such as [10], the function is also called torsion function. Throughout the paper, the pseudo null curves are parameterized by arc-length s.
Motivated by the angular measurement in Euclidean 3-space, the angles between any two non-null vectors u and v are defined according to the classification of vectors in , as follows [6]:
Definition 3.
Let u and v be spacelike vectors in .
- If u and v span a timelike vector subspace. Then we have and hence, there is a unique positive real number θ such thatThe real number θ is called the Lorentz timelike angle between u and v.
- If u and v span a spacelike vector subspace. Then we have and hence, there is a unique real number such thatThe real number θ is called the Lorentz spacelike angle between u and v.
Definition 4.
Let u and v be future pointing (past pointing) timelike vectors in . Then there is a unique non-negative real number θ such that
The real number θ is called the Lorentz timelike angle between u and v.
Definition 5.
Let u be a spacelike vector and v a future pointing timelike vector in . Then there is a unique non-negative real number θ such that
The real number θ is called the Lorentz timelike angle between u and v.
Remark 2.
Obviously, the angles recalled in Definitions 3–5 do not include the angles relating to lightlike vectors. In what follows, we will seek a method to fill this gap.
3. Main Conclusions
In this section, we will focus on the angle between any two lightlike vectors and the angles between a lightlike vector and a spacelike vector or a timelike vector, respectively.
3.1. The Angle between Any Two Lightlike Vectors
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by . From the lightlike vector , we let be an arbitrary lightlike vector which is independent to . Similarly, from the lightlike vector , we can assume another arbitrary lightlike vector which is independent to , where and are non-zero smooth functions of arc-length s.
From the Frenet frame of , we know that and which satisfy the axiom of angles. Thus, we have the following definition.
Definition 6.
The angle between any two lightlike vectors and is defined by
Remark 3.
Obviously, when , , and when , . Therefore, the function , represents the rotation angle between u and γ, between v and β, respectively. In particular, when , which coincides with the Frenet frame of the pseudo null curve .
3.2. The Angle between a Lightlike Vector and a Spacelike Vector
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by , and be any two lightlike vectors. Assume be an arbitrary unit spacelike vector, where , are smooth functions and .
From the Frenet frame of , we know that and which satisfy the axiom of angles. Then the angles and can be defined by
Considering the Frenet frame of , we can fix two vectors, a spacelike vector and a timelike vector . Due to is spacelike, is timelike, assuming is the angle between and , from Equation (5), we have
On the other hand, , then
Notice that from , then we have
Case 1: when , is a spacelike vector, i.e., and span a timelike subspace. Assume is the angle between and From Equation (2), we know
- when , we have
- when , we have
- when or , we have
- when or , we have
Case 2: when , is a timelike vector, i.e., and span a spacelike subspace. Assume is the angle between and From Equation (3), we know
- when or , we have
- when or , we have
- when or , we have
- when or , we have
Case 3: when , and span a lightlike subspace. And
- when , we have
- when , we have
- when , we have
- when , we have
Substituting Equations (9)–(12), (14)–(17) and (19)–(22) to Equation (6), we have the following definition.
Definition 7.
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by in , and any two lightlike vectors; a unit spacelike vector and a unit timelike vector; , an arbitrary unit spacelike vector. Then the angles and can be defined explicitly as
- if and span a timelike subspace, then
- 1.
- when , we get
- 2.
- when , we get
- 3.
- when or , we get
- 4.
- when or , we get
- if and span a spacelike subspace, then
- 1.
- when or , we get
- 2.
- when or , we get
- 3.
- when or , we get
- 4.
- when or , we get
- if and span a lightlike subspace, then
- 1.
- when , we get
- 2.
- when , we get
- 3.
- when , we get
- 4.
- when , we get
where θ is the angle between and , is the angle between and , and , is the angle between u and γ, between v and β, respectively.
Remark 4.
Particularly, when , then which is orthogonal to u and v; when , then which is orthogonal to v; when , then which is orthogonal to u.
Remark 5.
Obviously, if or , then and are decided by the angles θ and , completely.
3.3. The Angle between a Lightlike Vector and a Timelike Vector
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by , and any two lightlike vectors. Assume be an arbitrary unit timelike vector, where , are smooth functions and .
From the Frenet frame of , we know that and which satisfy the axiom of angles. Then the angles and can be defined by
Considering the Frenet frame of , we can fix two vectors, a spacelike vector and a timelike vector . Assume be the angle between and , the angle between and . Due to is spacelike, and are timelike, from Equations (4) and (5), we know
and
Notice that from . Then we have
- when , we get
- when , we get
- when or we get
- when or , we get
Definition 8.
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by in , and any two lightlike vectors; a unit spacelike vector and a unit timelike vector; , an arbitrary unit timelike vector. Then the angles and can be defined explicitly as
- 1.
- when , we get
- 2.
- when , we get
- 3.
- when or , we get
- 4.
- when or , we get
where is the angle between and , is the angle between and , and , is the angle between u and γ, between v and β, respectively.
Remark 6.
Obviously, if or , then , are decided by the angles and , completely.
Example 1.
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by and , two lightlike vectors. Then according to Definition 6, the angle between u and v is
Example 2.
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by and a lightlike vector. There is a unit spacelike vector whose intersection angles with and are all . From Definition 7, the angle can be expressed as follows:
- 1.
- when x and span a timelike subspace, and , we have
- if , then
- if , then
- if or , then
- if or , then
- 2.
- when x and span a spacelike subspace, and , we have
- if or , then
- if or , then
- if or , then
- if or , then
- 3.
- when x and span a lightlike subspace, and , we have
- if , then
- if , then
- if , then
- if , then
Example 3.
Let be a pseudo null curve framed by and a lightlike vector. There is a unit timelike vector whose intersection angles with and are all . From Definition 8 and , , the angle can be expressed as follows:
- 1.
- when , we have
- 2.
- when , we have
- 3.
- when or , we have
- 4.
- when or , we have
Author Contributions
J.Q., X.T. and J.L. set up the problem and computed the details. Y.H.K. checked and polished the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The first author was supported by NSFC (No. 11801065) and the fourth author was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (2016R1A2B1006974).
Acknowledgments
We thank H. Liu of Northeastern University and the referee for the careful review and the valuable comments to improve the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Ali, A.T.; Turgut, M. Position vector of a timelike slant helix in Minkowski 3-space. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2010, 365, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graves, L.K. Codimension one isometric immersions between Lorentz spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1979, 252, 367–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H. Ruled surfaces with lightlike ruling in 3-Minkowski space. J. Geom. Phys. 2009, 59, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Yuan, Y. Pitch functions of ruled surfaces and B-scrolls in Minkowski 3-space. J. Geom. Phys. 2012, 62, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, J.H.; Kim, Y.H. Directional associated curves of a null curve in E13. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2015, 52, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Wang, X.S. Classification of timelike constant slope Surfaces in 3-Dimensional Minkowski spaces. Results Math. 2013, 63, 1095–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez, R.; Munteanu, M.I. Constant angle surfaces in Minkowski space. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 2011, 18, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, J.H.; Kim, Y.H. Null helix and k-type null slant helices in E14. Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina 2016, 57, 71–83. [Google Scholar]
- Inoguchi, J.; Lee, S. Null curves in Monkowski 3-space. Int. Electron. J. Geom. 2008, 1, 40–83. [Google Scholar]
- Nesovic, E.; Ozturk, U.; Ozturk, E.B.K. On k-type pseudo null Darboux helices in Minkowski 3-space. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 439, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).