Abstract
We present general Leray-Schauder type theorems for compact acyclic Multifunctions, using the topological transversality theorem by the author.
MSC:
47H10; 54H25
1. Introduction
If F and G are continuous compact single valued maps and , then F is essential [1] if and only if G is essential. This result was extended to multimaps in a variety of settings; see [2,3] and the references therein. In this paper, using the topological transversality by the author for compact acyclic maps [2,4,5,6,7], we establish a variety of Leray-Schauder type theorems which are useful from an application viewpoint. Please note that essential maps automatically generate fixed point results for these maps. As a result, our theory can be applied when considering variation methods, iteration methods, perturbation methods, degree theory methods, upper and lower solution methods, etc. (see for example [8,9,10]). Many problems which arise naturally in applications can be formulated in the form and we can relate it to a simpler problem via the family of problems , . If the zero map is essential then under appropriate conditions (see our Leray-Schauder type alternatives) F will be essential (so it automatically has a fixed point).
Let be the Čech homology functor with compact carriers and coefficients in the field of rational numbers from the category of Hausdorff topological spaces and continuous maps to the category of graded vector spaces and linear maps of degree zero. Now (where X is a Hausdorff topological space) is a graded vector space, being the -dimensional Čech homology group with compact carriers of . For a continuous map , is the induced linear map where . A space X is called acyclic if X is nonempty, for every , and . Let and be subsets of Hausdorff topological spaces. Consider a map where denotes the family of nonempty compact subsets of . Now is called acyclic if is upper semicontinuous (u.s.c.) with acyclic values.
2. Topological Transversality Theorem
We begin this section with essential maps. Let be a completely regular topological space (i.e., a Tychonoff space) and an open subset of (now is the closure of in and the boundary of in ).
Definition 1.
Writeifis an acyclic compact map.
Definition 2.
Writeifwithwhen.
Definition 3.
Considering two mapsand they are said to be homotopic inwritteninif there exists a u.s.c. compact mapwithfor each,and(where).
Note is an equivalence relation in .
Definition 4.
A map is essential in if for any with and with in there exists a with .
In [4] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 1.
Consider two maps and in with in . Now is essential in iff is essential in .
We now present two ways of proceeding from here.
Approach 1.
This approach is motivated from [4,7] (here we present a more general result). We consider the question: If and are two maps in with is in ? We will now show that this is true if E is a topological (Hausdorff) vector space, U is convex and
[Note if E is an infinite dimensional Banach space and U is convex then [7] we know holds].
Let be two maps in with and let r be as in . Consider defined by , . Note , since . With
(here (note is convex) is ) it is immediate that
note is a u.s.c. compact map and for any fixed and note has acyclic values and finally note if and with then , a contradiction.
With
we have
Consequently in .
In this situation we replace Definition 4 with:
Definition 5.
A map is essential in if any map with there exists a with .
Recall topological vector spaces are Tychonoff so from Theorem 1 we have:
Theorem 2.
Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of and suppose holds. Suppose with in . Now is essential (Definition 5) in iff is essential (Definition 5) in .
From Theorem 2 we present very general Leray-Schauder type results.
Definition 6.
Write if is an acyclic compact map.
Theorem 3.
Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of , holds and . Assume with
and
Suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 5) in .
Proof.
We show J is essential (Definition 5) in . If this is true then is essential (Definition 5) in from Theorem 2. Let with . We need to show that G has a fixed point in U. Let
Note so from we have a with . Now yields so . □
Corollary 1.
Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of , holds, , and suppose holds. Suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 5) in .
Proof.
Let for and the result follows from Theorem 3. □
Remark 1.
(i). For spaces E which satisfy we refer the reader to [11].
(ii). Without loss of generality, take . Note if E is a completely metrizable locally convex space and for and then one homotopy from F to is (here and ). To see this note is a u.s.c. compact (see [12], Theorem 4.18) map and also note for a fixed and a fixed that is acyclic valued (recall homeomorphic spaces have isomorphic homology groups) so . [Note E being a completely metrizable locally convex space can be replaced by any (Hausdorff) topological vector space E which has the property that the closed convex hull of a compact set in E is compact].
Approach 2.
Here we do not assume E is a topological vector space and we do not assume . In this approach, instead of concentrating on homotopies, we will consider essential maps and spaces in general.
From Theorem 1, we present very general Leray-Schauder type results.
Definition 7.
Consider two maps and they are said to be homotopic in , written in , if there exists a u.s.c. compact map with for each , and (where ).
Theorem 4.
Let be a completely regular topological space, an open subset of and suppose . Assume with holding and suppose
and
Suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 4) in .
Proof.
We show J is essential (Definition 4) in (so then is essential (Definition 4) in from Theorem 1). Let with and with in . We need to show G has a fixed point in U. There exists (see Definition 3) a u.s.c. compact map with for each , and and let
Notice (see ) is closed and compact and (note for ). Thus, there exists a continuous map with and . Define by
Note is an upper semicontinuous compact map with for each , so as a result in . From we have a with . If then which contradicts . Consequently so and as a result which implies and so . □
Corollary 2.
Let be a completely regular topological space, an open subset of , and suppose . Assume
Suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 4) in .
Proof.
Let for and apply Theorem 4. □
Of course if holds then automatically holds. We now give a result where in plays a major role.
Theorem 5.
Let be a (metrizable) ANR, an open subset of , , and suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 4) in .
Proof.
It follows immediately from Corollary 2. once we show . Let with in , so (see Definition 7) there exists a u.s.c. compact map with for each , and . Note can be regarded as a closed subset of a normed space (see the Arens-Eells theorem). Since there is an open neighborhood of in and a retraction (continuous) . Let be a (continuous) function with and and let
(note if then ). For fixed note is acyclic valued and is a u.s.c. compact map i.e., . Now from [3] there exists a with . If then , a contradiction (note and ). If then since (note ) and one has , a contradiction. Thus, , , so i.e., holds. □
Remark 2.
From the proof above, please note that one could replace E is a (metrizable) ANR with any space provided the following hold: (i). can be regarded as a closed subset of a normal space , (ii). there exists an open neighborhood of in and a retraction , and (iii). any map has a fixed point in X.
One can extend the above ideas to many other natural situations. In the remainder of this section, we will consider several extensions. Let be a (Hausdorff) topological vector space (so automatically Tychonoff), a topological vector space, and an open subset of . Also is a linear (not necessarily continuous) single valued map where is a vector subspace of and finally let be a linear, continuous single valued map with an isomorphism (i.e., a linear homeomorphism) and for convenience we say .
A map is said to be upper semicontinuous ( u.s.c.) if is u.s.c. Now is said to be compact if is a compact map.
Definition 8.
Write if .
Definition 9.
Write if with for .
Definition 10.
Consider two maps and they are said to be homotopic in , written in , if there exists a u.s.c., compact mapping such that for each and with (where ).
Definition 11.
A map is L-essential in if for any with and with in there exists a with .
In [2,4,5] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 6.
Consider maps and in with in . Now is L-essential in if and only if is L-essential in .
We present the analogue of Theorem 2. Suppose holds and U is convex. Let be in with . Then in . To see this let , and be as before Definition 5 Note and are u.s.c. and compact mappings and in (if and with then , a contradiction) and in . Combining gives in .
In this situation we replace Definition 11 with:
Definition 12.
A map is L-essential in if for any with there exists a with .
From Theorem 6 we have:
Theorem 7.
Let U be convex and suppose holds. Consider two maps and in with in . Now is L-essential (Definition 12) in if and only if is L-essential (Definition 12) in .
Now we present the analogue of Theorem 4.
Definition 13.
Write if .
Definition 14.
Consider two maps and they are said to be homotopic in , written in , if there exists a u.s.c., compact mapping with for each , and (where ).
Theorem 8.
Let , , , and be as above and suppose . Assume and the following hold:
Suppose in . Then is L-essential (Definition 11) in .
Proof.
We show J is L-essential (Definition 11) in (and then apply Theorem 6). Let with and with in . We need to show there exists a with . There exists (see Definition 10) a u.s.c., compact mapping with for each , and and let
Now (see ) is compact, , and since X is Tychonoff there exists a (continuous) map with and . Let be
Now is a u.s.c., compact mapping and for each , so in . Now from there exists with . If then which contradicts . Consequently so and so , and . □
Next we consider a generalization of essential maps, namely the d-essential maps. Let be a completely regular topological space and an open subset of .
Consider and write , here is , and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set where .
Definition 15.
Let and write . We write is d-essential if for any (write ) and and in we have .
Remark 3.
If is -essential then
so there exists a with .
In [6] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 9.
Consider two maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-essential if and only if is d-essential.
We present the analogue of Theorem 2. Suppose E is a (Hausdorff) topological vector space, U is convex and assume holds. Let be in with . Then before Definition 5 we showed in . In this situation, we can replace Definition 15 with:
Definition 16.
Let and write . We write is d-essential if for any (write ) and we have .
From Theorem 9 we have:
Theorem 10.
Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of , and suppose holds. Consider two maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-essential (Definition 16) if and only if is d-essential (Definition 16).
Now we present the analogue of Theorem 4.
Consider and write , here is , and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set where .
Theorem 11.
Let be a completely regular topological space, an open subset of , , and d is the map defined in . Suppose (write ), (write ) and and hold. Also suppose
and in . Then is d-essential (Definition 15).
Proof.
We show J is d-essential (Definition 15) (and then is d-essential (Definition 15) from Theorem 9). Let (write ), with in . We need to show . There exists (see Definition 3) a u.s.c. compact map with for each , and . Let be and let
Notice (see ) is compact and . Thus, there exists a continuous function with and . Let be
Note is a u.s.c. compact map with for each , so in . Write and implies
Note from that
and also from (note for ) that
so
Finally, note (note ) so
and as a result
□
Next we consider a generalization of L-essential maps, namely the d-L-essential maps. Let and T be as described after Remark 2.
Consider and write , here is , and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set where .
Definition 17.
Let and write . We write is d-L-essential if for any (write ) with and in we have .
Remark 4.
If is -L-essential then
so there exists a with .
In [5] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 12.
Consider maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-L-essential if and only if is d-L-essential.
We present the analogue of Theorem 2. Suppose holds and U is convex. Let be in with . Then after Theorem 6 we showed in . In this situation we can replace Definition 17 with:
Definition 18.
Let and write . We write is d-L-essential if for any (write ) with we have .
From Theorem 12 we have:
Theorem 17.
Let U be convex and suppose holds. Consider two maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-L-essential (Definition 18) if and only if is d-L-essential (Definition 18).
Finally, we present the analogue of Theorem 4. Consider and write , here given is , and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set where .
Theorem 18.
Let , , , and be as above, , and d is the map defined in . Suppose (write ), (write ) and and hold. In addition assume
and in . Then is d-L-essential (Definition 17).
Proof.
We show J is d-L-essential (Definition 17) (and then apply Theorem 12). Let and write , with in . Now there exists (Definition 10) a u.s.c., compact map with for each , and . Let be and let
Note (see ) is compact, and since X is Tychonoff there exists a (continuous) map with and . Let by
Note is a u.s.c., compact map with for each , so in . Write and implies
Note from that
and also from (note for ) we have
so
Finally, note (note ) so
and so
□
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Granas, A. Sur la méthode de continuité de Poincare. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1976, 282, 983–985. [Google Scholar]
- O’Regan, D. Continuation principles based on essential maps and topological degree. Appl. Anal. 2015, 94, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Precup, R. On the topological transversality principle. Nonlinear Anal. 1993, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, D. Continuation theorems for acyclic maps in topological spaces. Commun. Appl. Anal. 2009, 13, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
- O’Regan, D. A unified theory for homotopy principles for multimaps. Appl. Anal. 2013, 92, 1944–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, D. Homotopy principles for d-essential maps. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2013, 14, 415–422. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, R.P.; O’Regan, D. A note on the topological transversality theorem for acyclic maps. Appl. Math. Lett. 2005, 18, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- He, J.H.; Ji, F.Y. Taylor series solution for Lane-Emden equation. J. Math. Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, D.; Precup, R. Theorems of Leray-Schauder Type and Applications; Gordon and Breach Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Gorniewicz, L. Topological Fixed Point Theory of Multivalued Mappings; Kluwer Acad. Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- O’Regan, D. Fixed point theory on extension type spaces and essential maps on topological spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2004, 1, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliprantis, C.D.; Border, K.C. Infinite-Dimensional Analysis. Studies in Economic Theory; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1994; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).