1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Let 
 be the class of functions 
f of the form
      
      which are analytic in the open unit disk 
 and 
 be the class of functions from 
 which are univalent in 
. One of the classical results regarding univalent functions related to coefficients 
 of a function’s Taylor series, named as the Fekete-Szegö problem, introduced by Fekete and Szegö [
1], is defined as follows:
If 
 and is of the form (
1), then
      
This result is sharp. The Fekete-Szegö problem has a rich history in literature. Several results dealing with maximizing the non-linear functional 
 for various classes and subclasses of univalent functions have been proved. The functional has been examined for 
 to be both a real and complex number. Several authors used certain classified techniques to maximize the Fekete-Szegö functional 
 for different types of functions having interesting geometric characteristics of image domains. For more details and results, we refer to [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11]. The function 
f is said to be subordinate to the function 
 written symbolically as 
 if there exists a schwarz function 
w such that
      
      where 
 for 
 Let 
P denote the class of analytic functions 
p such that 
 and 
 For details, see [
12].
In 1991, Goodman [
13] initiated the concept of a conic domain by introducing generalized convex functions which generated the first parabolic region as an image domain of analytic functions. He introduced and defined the class 
 of uniformly convex functions as follows:
Later on, Rønning [
14], and Ma and Minda [
7] independently gave the most suitable one variable characterization of the class 
 and defined it as follows:
This characterization gave birth to the first conic (parabolic) domain
This domain was then generalized by Kanas and Wiśniowska [
15,
16] who introduced the domain
      
The conic domain 
 represents the right half plane for 
 hyperbolic regions when 
 parabolic region for 
 and elliptic regions when 
 For more details, we refer [
15,
16]. This conic domain 
 has been extensively studied in [
17,
18,
19]. The domain 
 was also generalized by Noor and Malik [
20] by introducing the domain
      
The domain 
 represents the petal type region, for more details, we refer to [
20]. Now, we consider the following class of functions which take all values from the domain 
Definition 1. A function  is said to be in the class  if and only ifwhere ,   It can be seen that . This fact leads us to the following implications of different well-known classes of analytic functions.
      
-  the well-known class of functions with real part greater than  -  see [ 12- ]. 
-  the well-known class of functions, introduced by Kanas and Wiśniowska [ 4- , 21- ]. 
Now we consider the following classes 
 of uniformly Janowski convex functions and 
 of corresponding Janowski starlike functions (see [
20] ) as follows.
Definition 2. A function  is said to be in the class   if and only ifor equivalently,  Definition 3. A function  is said to be in the class   if and only ifor equivalently,  It can easily be seen that 
 It is clear that 
 and 
 the well-known classes of uniformly convex and corresponding starlike functions respectively, introduced by Goodman [
13] and Rønning [
22].
In 1994, Ma and Minda [
7] found the maximum bound of Fekete-Szegö functional 
 for uniformly convex functions of class 
 and then Kanas [
21] investigated the same for the functions of class 
 Our aim is to solve this classical Fekete-Szegö problem for the functions of classes 
 and 
 We need the following lemmas (see [
7]) to prove our results.
Lemma 1. If  is a function with positive real part in  then, for any complex number μ,and the result is sharp for the functions  Lemma 2. If  is a function with positive real part in  then, for any real number v, When  or , the equality holds if and only if  is  or one of its rotations. If , then, the equality holds if and only if  or one of its rotations. If , the equality holds if and only if,or one of its rotations. If  then, the equality holds if and only if  is reciprocal of one of the function such that equality holds in the case of . Although the above upper bound is sharp, when , it can be improved as follows:and    2. Main Results
Theorem 1. Let ,  and of the form  Then, for a complex number  we haveand for a real number  we have These results are sharp and the equality in (6) holds for the functionsor When  or  the equality in (7) holds for the function  or one of its rotations. If , then, the equality in (7) holds for the function  or one of its rotations. If , the equality in (7) holds for the functionor one of its rotations. If  then, the equality in (7) holds for the functions  which is reciprocal of one of the function such that equality holds in the case for .  Proof.  For 
 and of the form 
 we consider
        
        where 
 is such that 
 and 
 It follows easily that
        
Now, if 
 then from (
11), one may have
        
        where 
 and 
, see [
21]. Using these, the above series reduces to
        
Since 
, so from relations (
2), (
3) and (
12), one may have
        
If 
 then equating coefficients of 
z and 
 one may have
        
Now for a complex number 
 consider
        
Using Lemma 1, one may have
        
        where
        
This leads us to the required inequality (
6) and applying Lemma 2 to the expression (
14) for real number 
, we get the required inequality (
7). Sharpness follows from the functions 
, defined by (
8)–(
10), and the following series form.
        
		 □
		
 Corollary 1. Let  and of the form  Then, for a complex number  we haveand for real number  we have These inequalities are sharp.
 In [
4,
21], Kanas studied the class 
 which consists of functions who take all values from the conic domain 
. Kanas [
21] found the bound of Fekete-Szegö functional for the class 
 whose particular case for 
 is as follows:
Let 
 Then, for real number 
 we have
      
We observe that Corollary 1 improves the bounds of the Fekete-Szegö functional  for the functions of class .
Theorem 2. Let ,  and of the form (1). Then, for a real number  we have This result is sharp.
 Proof.  If 
, 
 then it follows from relations (
2)–(
4),
        
        where 
 is such that 
 and 
 The right hand side of above expression gets its series form from (
13) and reduces to
        
If 
 then one may have
        
From (
19) and (
20), comparison of coefficients of 
z and 
 gives
        
        and
        
This implies, by using (
21), that
        
Now, for a real number 
 consider
        
        where
        
Applying Lemma 2 leads us to the required result. The inequality (
18) is sharp and equality holds for 
 or 
 when 
 is 
 or one of its rotations, where 
 is defined such that 
 If 
, then, the equality holds for the function 
 or one of its rotations, where 
 is defined such that 
 If 
, the equality holds for the function 
 or one of its rotations, where 
 is defined such that 
 If 
 then, the equality holds for 
, which is such that 
 is reciprocal of one of the function such that equality holds in the case of 
. □
 For 
 the above result takes the following form which is proved by Ma and Minda [
8].
Corollary 2. Let  and of the form (1). Then, for a real number  This result is sharp.
 Theorem 3. Let ,  and of the form (1). Then, for a real number  This result is sharp.
 Proof.  The proof follows similarly as in Theorem 2. □
 For  the above result reduces to the following form.
Corollary 3. Let  and of the form (1). Then, for a real number   Now we consider the inverse function  which maps petal type regions to the open unit disk , defined as   and we find the following coefficient bound for inverse functions. As the classes  and  are the subclasses of  Thus the existence of such inverse functions to the functions from  and  is assured.
Theorem 4. Let  and  Then,  Proof.  Since 
 so it is easy to see that
        
By using (
21) and (
22), one can have
        
        and
        
From (
19) and (
20), comparison of 
 gives
        
Using the values of 
 we get
        
Now, from (
24) and (
25), one can have
        
        and
        
Application of the bounds 
 and 
 (see Lemma 2 for 
 and 
) gives 
 Lastly, (
26) reduces to
        
        where
        
        and
        
Applying the bounds 
 see [
23], 
 and 
 see [
7] to the right hand side of (
27) and using the fact that 
 we have 
 and this completes the proof. □
 For 
 the above result takes the following form which is proved by Ma and Minda [
8].
Corollary 4. Let  and  Then,  Theorem 5. Let  and  Then, for a real number  we have This result is sharp.
 Proof.  The proof follows directly from (
24), (
25) and Lemma 2. □