You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Mathematics
  • Article
  • Open Access

23 November 2018

Fourier Series for Functions Related to Chebyshev Polynomials of the First Kind and Lucas Polynomials

,
,
and
1
Department of Mathematics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Korea
2
Department of Mathematics, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Korea
3
Graduate School of Education, Konkuk University, Seoul 139-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Functions and Applications

Abstract

In this paper, we derive Fourier series expansions for functions related to sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and of Lucas polynomials. From the Fourier series expansions, we are able to express those two kinds of sums of finite products of polynomials as linear combinations of Bernoulli polynomials.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

In this paper, we will consider some functions related to sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and of Lucas polynomials, and derive Fourier series expansions for them. Then, from the Fourier series expansions, we will be able to express those two kinds of sums of finite products of polynomials as linear combinations of Bernoulli polynomials.
Here, we would like to mention the following example as a motivation for studying these kinds of sums of finite products of special polynomials. Let us consider
γ m ( x ) = k = 1 m 1 1 k ( m k ) B k ( x ) B m k ( x ) , ( m 2 ) .
Then, in the same way as we will do in (14) and (17), it is possible to express γ m ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials by making use of the Fourier series expansion of γ m ( < x > ) (see (11)). Then, unlike the known involved proofs, from this expression, we can easily deduce the famous FPZ-identity (Faber-Pandharipande-Zagier identity) (see [1]) and a variant of the Miki’s identity ([2,3,4,5]). Indeed, from the Fourier series expansion of γ m ( < x > ) , we were able to deduce the following polynomial identity in (2), from which the variant of Miki’s identity and FPZ-identity follow respectively by setting x = 0 and x = 1 2 in the following:
k = 1 m 1 1 2 k 2 m 2 k B 2 k x B 2 m 2 k x + 2 2 m 1 B 1 x B 2 m 1 x = 1 m k = 1 m 1 2 k 2 m 2 k B 2 k B 2 m 2 k x + 1 m H 2 m 1 B 2 m x + 2 2 m 1 B 1 x B 2 m 1 , m 2 ,
where H m = j = 1 m 1 j are the harmonic numbers.
The reader refers to the Introduction of the paper [6] for some details on this.
Along the same line as the present paper, we obtained Fourier series expansions of sums of finite products of functions related to some Appell and some non-Appell polynomials and were able to express those sums of finite products of such polynomials in terms of Bernoulli polynomials as immediate corollaries. Indeed, they had been done for Appell polynomials like Bernoulli and Euler polynomials in [7,8], and, for quite a few non-Appell polynomials, namely Genocchi polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials of the second, third, fourth kinds, and Fibonacci, Legendre and Laguerre polynomials in [9,10,11,12]. Here, we let the reader refer to [13,14] as general references on orthogonal polynomials and to [15,16,17] as some recent papers on Lucas polynomials. As to some related results, we recommend the reader to look at the papers [7,8,12,18,19,20,21,22].
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind have important applications in approximation theory. Indeed, their roots are used as nodes in polynomial interpolation and the resulting interpolation polynomial gives us a good polynomial approximation to a continuous function under the maximum norm. On the other hand, Lucas polynomials are useful in generating irreducible polynomials of high degree so that they have some applications in coding and cryptography. In addition, Lucas numbers are used in the areas relevant to operational research, statistics and computational mathematics, and allow us to find very large prime numbers in low complexity.
The Chebyshev polynomials T n ( x ) of the first kind and the Lucas polynomials L n ( x ) are respectively given by the recurrence relations as follows (see [13,14,16]):
T n + 2 ( x ) = 2 x T n + 1 ( x ) T n ( x ) , ( n 0 ) , T 0 ( x ) = 1 , T 1 ( x ) = x ,
L n + 2 ( x ) = x L n + 1 ( x ) + L n ( x ) , ( n 0 ) , L 0 ( x ) = 2 , L 1 ( x ) = x .
From (3) and (4), we can easily derive the generating functions for T n ( x ) and L n ( x ) as follows:
F ( t , x ) = 1 x t 1 2 x t + t 2 = n = 0 T n ( x ) t n ,
G ( t , x ) = 2 x t 1 x t t 2 = n = 0 L n ( x ) t n .
The T n ( x ) and L n ( x ) are explicitly given as in the following:
T n ( x ) = n 2 l = 0 n 2 ( 1 ) l 1 n l n l l ( 2 x ) n 2 l , ( n 1 ) ,
L n ( x ) = n l = 0 n 2 1 n l n l l x n 2 l , ( n 1 ) .
It is well known or easily checked from (7) and (8) that the two polynomials are related by
L n ( x ) = 2 i n T n i x 2 , i = 1 .
In terms of the generating function, the Bernoulli polynomials B n ( x ) are given by
t e t 1 e x t = n = 0 B n ( x ) t n n ! .
For any real number x, the fractional part of x is denoted by
< x > = x [ x ] [ 0 , 1 ) ,
where [ x ] indicates the greatest integer x . For any integers m , r , with m 2 , r 1 , we let
α m , r ( x ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) ,
where the first and second inner sums run, respectively, over all nonnegative integers i 1 , , i r + 1 , with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l , and with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 .
Then, we will consider the functions α m , r ( < x > ) , and derive their Fourier series expansions. From these Fourier series expansions, as a corollary, we can express α m , r ( x ) as a linear combination of Bernoulli polynomials. Indeed, Theorems 1 and 2 are our results for the Fourier expansions of α m , r ( < x > ) , and Theorem 3 is those for the expressions of α m , r ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
Theorem 1.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let
Δ m , r = m + r r ! l = 0 m 1 2 ( 1 ) l m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r 2 m 2 l .
Assume that Δ m , r = 0 , for some integers m , r . Then, we have the following:
(a) 
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) = 1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j ( r + j 1 ) j ( 2 π i n ) j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x ,
for all x R . Here, the convergence is uniform.
(b) 
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) = 1 2 r j = 0 , j 1 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) ,
for all x R . Here, ( x ) r are the falling factorial polynomials defined by
( x ) r = x ( x 1 ) ( x r + 1 ) , ( r 1 ) , ( x ) 0 = 1 .
Theorem 2.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , let Δ m , r be as in (13). Assume that Δ m , r 0 , for some positive integers m , r . Then, we have the following:
(a) 
1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j ( r + j 1 ) j ( 2 π i n ) j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 1 2 Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , ( 1 ) m 2 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r + 1 2 Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
(b) 
1 2 r j = 0 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) ,
                         for all x R Z ;
1 2 r j = 0 , j 1 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = 1 2 r Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , ( 1 ) m 2 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r + 1 2 Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
Theorem 3.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let Δ m , r be as in (13). Then, we have the identity
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) = 1 2 r j = 0 m 2 j r + j 1 r 1 Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( x ) .
In addition, for any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we put
β m , r ( x ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) ,
where the first and second inner sums are over all nonnegative integers i 1 , , i r + 1 , with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l , and with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 , respectively.
Then, we will derive the Fourier series expansions of the functions β m , r ( < x > ) , and express β m , r ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials, as an easy corollary to these Fourier series expansions.
In detail, Theorem 4 is our results for the Fourier series expansions of the functions β m , r ( < x > ) , and Theorem 5 is those for the expressions of β m , r ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
Theorem 4.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let
Ω m , r = 2 r + 1 ( m + r ) r ! l = 0 m 1 2 1 m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r .
Then, we have the following:
(a) 
2 r Ω m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 2 r j = 1 m 1 2 π i n j ( r + j 1 ) j 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) , + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 1 2 Ω m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , 1 2 Ω m , r + 2 r + 1 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
(b) 
2 r j = 0 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) ,
                         for x R Z ;
2 r j = 0 , j 1 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = 1 2 Ω m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , 1 2 Ω m , r + 2 r + 1 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
Theorem 5.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , let Ω m , r be as in (16). Then, we have the identity
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) = 2 r j = 0 m r + j 1 r 1 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( x ) .

4. Conclusions

In general, the connection problem is concerned with determining the coefficients c n m ( k ) in the representation of the product of two polynomials r n ( x ) and s m ( x ) as linear combinations of an arbitrary polynomial sequence p k ( x ) k 0 :
r n ( x ) s m ( x ) = k = 0 n + m c n m ( k ) p k ( x ) .
As a generalization of this and motivated by the example in (1), we considered the problem of representing sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and those of Lucas polynomials in terms of Bernoulli polynomials. We accomplished this by deriving the Fourier series expansions of the functions related to those two kinds of sums of finite products of polynomials. Finally, we remark here that it is certainly possible to represent such sums of finite products of polynomials by some orthogonal polynomials, which is our ongoing project.

Author Contributions

T.K. and D.S.K. conceived the framework and structured the whole paper; D.S.K. wrote the paper; L.-C.J. and G.-W.J. checked the results of the paper; D.S.K. and T.K. completed the revision of the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the referees for their comments and suggestions which improved the original manuscript in its present form.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Faber, C.; Pandharipande, R. Hodge integrals and Gromov-Witten theory. Invent. Math. 2000, 139, 173–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dunne, G.V.; Schubert, C. Bernoulli number identities from quantum field theory and topological string theory. Commun. Number Theory Phys. 2013, 7, 225–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gessel, I.M. On Miki’s identity for Bernoulli numbers. J. Number Theory 2005, 110, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miki, H. A relation between Bernoulli numbers. J. Number Theory 1978, 10, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shiratani, K.; Yokoyama, S. An application of p-adic convolutions. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A 1982, 36, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.C.; Jang, G.-W. Fourier series of sums of products of Bernoulli functions and their applications. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 2798–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agarwal, R.P.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Bernoulli functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, G.-W.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Euler functions. In Advances in Real and Complex Analysis with Applications, 243–260, Trends in Math; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Park, J.W. Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the second and of Fibonacci polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Park, J.W. Sums of finite products of Legendre and Laguerre polynomials. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.C.; Jang, G.-W. Sums of finite products of Genocchi functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.; Roy, R. Special functions. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 71; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  14. Beals, R.; Wong, R. Special functions and orthogonal polynomials. In Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 153; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma, R.; Zhang, W. Several identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2007, 45, 164–170. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, T.; Zhang, W. Some identities involving Fibonacci, Lucas polynomials and their applications. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie 2012, 55, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, W. Some identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2004, 42, 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jang, G.-W.; Dolgy, D.V.; Jang, L.C.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Sums of products of two variable higher-order Fubini functions arising from Fourier series. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 533–550. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, H.-I.; Kwon, J. Representing sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind and Fibonacci polynomials in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 321–335. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, T.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kim, D.S. Fourier series of sums of products of higher-order Genocchi functions. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 215–230. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.; Jang, G.-W. Sums of finite products of Legendre and Laguerre polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 551–565. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dogly, D.V.; Jang, G.-W.; Kwon, J. Fourier series of functions related to two variable higher-order Fubini polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 589–605. [Google Scholar]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.