Next Article in Journal
The Opening Capability for Security against Privacy Infringements in the Smart Grid Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Information
Previous Article in Journal
High-Order Energy and Linear Momentum Conserving Methods for the Klein-Gordon Equation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acquisition War-Gaming Technique for Acquiring Future Complex Systems: Modeling and Simulation Results for Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Information

School of Business, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2018, 6(10), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100201
Submission received: 27 September 2018 / Revised: 4 October 2018 / Accepted: 8 October 2018 / Published: 13 October 2018

Abstract

:
The Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM) operator is a classical mean type aggregation operator used in modern information fusion theory, which is suitable to aggregate numerical values. The prominent characteristic of the MSM operator is that it can capture the interrelationship among multi-input arguments. Motivated by the ideal characteristic of the MSM operator, in this paper, we expand the MSM operator, generalized MSM (GMSM), and dual MSM (DMSM) operator with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (IV2TLPFNs) to propose the interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy MSM (IV2TLPFMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted MSM (IV2TLPFWMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy GMSM (IN2TLPFGMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted GMSM (IV2TLPFWGMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy DMSM (IN2TLPFDMSM) operator, Interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted DMSM (IV2TLPFWDMSM) operator. Then the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) methods are developed with these three operators. Finally, an example of green supplier selection is used to show the proposed methods.

1. Introduction

Atanassov [1,2] introduced the concept of an intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), which is a generalization of the concept of fuzzy set [3]. Each element in the IFS is expressed by an ordered pair, and each ordered pair is characterized by a membership degree and a non-membership degree. The sum of the membership degree and the non-membership degree of each ordered pair is less than or equal to 1. More recently, the Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS) [4,5] has emerged as an effective tool for depicting uncertainty of the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems. The PFS is also characterized by the membership degree and the non-membership degree, whose sum of squares is less than or equal to 1, the PFS is more general than the IFS. Zhang and Xu [6] developed a Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) for handling the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem within Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFNs). Peng and Yang [7] proposed the division and subtraction operations for PFNs, and also developed a Pythagorean fuzzy superiority and inferiority ranking method to solve multicriteria group decision making problems with PFNs. Ren et al. [8] developed the Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese for Interactive Multi-Criteria Decision Making) approach which considers the DMs’ psychological behaviors. Garg [9] proposed the new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation by using Einstein Operations. Zhang [10] proposed the hierarchical QUALIFLEX (qualitative flexible multiple criteria method) approach in PFS. Chen [11] developed the Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I KOmpromisno Resenje) models. Peng and Yang [12] proposed the MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) method for multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with PFNs. Zeng et al. [13] developed a hybrid method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. Garg [14] studied a novel accuracy function under interval-valued PFSs for solving multicriteria decision making problem. Wei [15] utilized arithmetic and geometric operations [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] to develop some Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators. Wei and Lu [25] utilize power aggregation operators [26,27,28,29] to develop some Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators. Wei and Lu [30] we extend the Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM) [31] to the Pythagorean fuzzy environment to propose the Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean (PFMSM) operator and Pythagorean fuzzy weighted Maclaurin symmetric mean (PFWMSM) operator. Wan et al. [32] proposed a Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for MAGDM with Pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees. Peng and Dai [33] studied the Pythagorean fuzzy stochastic MADM with prospect theory. Garg [34] proposed linear programming for MADM with interval-valued PFS (IVPFSs). Chen [35] proposed an interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy outranking method with a closeness-based assignment model for MADM. Garg [36] developed a novel improved accuracy function for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets.
Although, IVPFSs theory has been broadly applied to many domains, all the above approaches are unsuitable to depict the membership degree and a non-membership degree of an element to a set by interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic sets (IV2TLSs) [37]. In order to overcome this issue, we propose the definition of interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (IV2TLPFSs) based on the IVPFSs [34] and 2-tuple linguistic sets [38,39]. The MSM operator [31] is a famous aggregation operator which can depict interrelationships among the multi-input arguments. Moreover, for a given collection of arguments, the MSM operator is monotonically decreasing with respect to the values of parameters, which can reflect the risk preferences of the decision makers in practical situations. In the past few years, the MSM has received more and more attentions, many important results both in theory and application are developed [40,41,42,43]. Therefore, the MSM operators can supply a robust and flexible mechanism to deal with the information fusion in MADM problems. Because IV2TLPFSs can easily describe the fuzzy information, and the MSM operator can capture interrelationships among the multi-input arguments, it is necessary to extend the MSM operators to deal with the 2TLPFNs. The aim of this paper is to propose some MSM operators with IV2TLPFNs, then to study some properties of these operators, and applied them to cope with the MADM with IV2TLPFNs. In order to do so, the rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we develop the IV2TLPFSs. In Section 3, we develop MSM operators with IV2TLPFSs. In Section 4, we develop generalized MSM operators with IV2TLPFSs. In Section 5, we develop dual MSM operators with IV2TLPFSs. In Section 6, we present an example for green supplier selection. Conclusions are given in Section 7.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we shall propose the concept of interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (IV2TLPFSs) based on the IVPFSs [34] and 2TLSs [38,39].

2.1. 2-Tuple Linguistic Sets

Definition 1.
[38,39] Let S = { s i | i = 0 , 1 , , t } be a linguistic term set with odd cardinality. Any label, s i represents a possible value for a linguistic variable, and S can be defined as:
S = { s 0 = e x t r e m e l y   p o o r ,   s 1 = v e r y   p o o r ,   s 2 = p o o r ,   s 3 = m e d i u m , s 4 = g o o d ,   s 5 = v e r y   g o o d ,   s 6 = e x t r e m e l y   g o o d . }
Herrera and Martinez [38,39] developed the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model based on the concept of symbolic translation. It is used for representing the linguistic assessment information by means of a 2-tuple ( s i , ρ i ) , where s i is a linguistic label for predefined linguistic term set S and ρ i is the value of symbolic translation, and ρ i [ 0.5 , 0.5 ) .

2.2. Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets

In this section, some basic concepts of the PFSs and IVPFSs have been reviewed over a fix set X .
Definition 2.
[4,5] A PFS P is defined as
P = { x , ( μ P ( x ) , ν P ( x ) ) | x X }
where the functions μ P :   X [ 0 , 1 ] and ν P :   X [ 0 , 1 ] defines the degrees of membership and non-membership of the element x X to P , such that for each x , the condition ( μ p ( x ) ) 2 + ( ν p ( x ) ) 2 1 , holds.
Definition 3.
[8] The p = ( μ , ν ) be called as a Pythagorean fuzzy number (PFN) and define the score and accuracy functions as S ( p ) = μ 2 ν 2 and H ( p ) = μ 2 + ν 2 . In order to compare two or more PFNs p 1 and p 2 , a comparison law is defined as
(1) 
if S ( p 1 ) < S ( p 2 ) , then p 1 < p 2 ;
(2) 
if S ( p 1 ) = S ( p 2 ) , then
(i) 
if H ( p 1 ) = H ( p 2 ) , then p 1 = p 2 ;
(ii) 
if H ( p 1 ) < H ( p 2 ) , then p 1 < p 2 .

2.3. Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets

Zhang [10] extended the PFSs to the IVPFSs which is defined as followed over the fix set X .
Definition 4.
[10] An IVPFS P ˜ is defined as
P ˜ = { x , ( μ ˜ P ˜ ( x ) , ν ˜ P ˜ ( x ) ) | x X }
where μ ˜ P ˜ ( x ) = [ μ P ˜ L ( x ) , μ P ˜ R ( x ) ] , ν ˜ P ˜ ( x ) = [ ν P ˜ L ( x ) , ν P ˜ R ( x ) ] are the interval numbers of [0,1] with the condition 0 ( μ P ˜ R ( x ) ) 2 + ( ν P ˜ R ( x ) ) 2 1 , x X . The pair p ˜ = ( [ u p ˜ L , u p ˜ R ] , [ v p ˜ L , v p ˜ R ] ) is called as an IVPF number (IVPFN), where u p ˜ , ν p ˜   [ 0 , 1 ] and ( u p ˜ R ) 2 + ( ν p ˜ R ) 2 1 .
Theorem 1.
[14] For three IVPFNs p ˜ 1 = ( [ u p ˜ 1 L , u p ˜ 1 R ] , [ v p ˜ 1 L , v p ˜ 1 R ] ) , p ˜ 2 = ( [ u p ˜ 2 L , u p ˜ 2 R ] , [ v p ˜ 2 L , v p ˜ 2 R ] ) , and p ˜ = ( [ u p ˜ L , u p ˜ R ] , [ v p ˜ L , v p ˜ R ] ) , the basic operational laws are defined as follows:
( 1 )   p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 = ( [ ( u p ˜ 1 L ) 2 + ( u p ˜ 2 L ) 2 ( u p ˜ 1 L ) 2 ( u p ˜ 2 L ) 2 , ( u p ˜ 1 R ) 2 + ( u p ˜ 2 R ) 2 ( u p ˜ 1 R ) 2 ( u p ˜ 2 R ) 2 ] , [ v p ˜ 1 L v p ˜ 2 L , v p ˜ 1 R v p ˜ 2 R ] ) ; ( 2 )   p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 = ( [ μ p ˜ 1 L v p ˜ 2 L , μ p ˜ 1 R v p ˜ 2 R ] , [ ( v p ˜ 1 L ) 2 + ( v p ˜ 2 L ) 2 ( v p ˜ 1 L ) 2 ( v p ˜ 2 L ) 2 , ( v p ˜ 1 R ) 2 + ( v p ˜ 2 R ) 2 ( v p ˜ 1 R ) 2 ( v p ˜ 2 R ) 2 ] ) ; ( 3 )   λ p ˜ = ( [ 1 ( 1 ( u p ˜ L ) 2 ) λ , 1 ( 1 ( u p ˜ R ) 2 ) λ ] , [ ( v p ˜ L ) λ , ( v p ˜ R ) λ ] ) , λ > 0 ; ( 4 )   ( p ˜ ) λ = ( [ ( μ p ˜ L ) λ , ( μ p ˜ R ) λ ] [ 1 ( 1 ( v p ˜ L ) 2 ) λ , 1 ( 1 ( v p ˜ R ) 2 ) λ ] ) , λ > 0 ; ( 5 )   p ˜ c = ( [ v p ˜ L , v p ˜ R ] , [ μ p ˜ L , μ p ˜ R ] ) .

2.4. Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets

Then, we shall propose the concept of interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (IV2TLPFSs) based on the IVPFSs [34] and 2TLSs [38,39].
Definition 5.
Assume that P = { p 0 , p 1 , , p t } is a 2TLSs with odd cardinality t + 1 . If p ˜ = [ ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ] , [ ( s χ L , ξ L ) , ( s χ R , ξ R ) ] is defined for [ ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ] , [ ( s χ L , ξ L ) , ( s χ R , ξ R ) ] P where [ ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ]   a n d   [ ( s χ L , ξ L ) , ( s χ R , ξ R ) ] express independently the degree of membership and non-membership by 2TLSs, then IV2TLPFSs is defined as follows:
p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ]
where Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) [ 0 , t ] , and 0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Definition 6.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) , ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) ] , [ ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) , ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) ] be an IV2TLPFN in P. Then the score and accuracy functions of p ˜ 1 are defined as follows:
S ( p ˜ 1 ) = Δ { 1 2 t ( 2 t 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ) 2 ) } , S ( p ˜ 1 ) [ 0 , 1 ]
H ( p ˜ 1 ) = Δ { 1 2 t ( ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ) 2 ) } ,   H ( p ˜ 1 ) [ 0 , 1 ]
Definition 7.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) , ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) ] , [ ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) , ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) ] and p ˜ 2 = [ ( s ϕ 2 L , φ 2 L ) , ( s ϕ 2 R , φ 2 R ) ] , [ ( s χ 2 L , ξ 2 L ) , ( s χ 2 R , ξ 2 R ) ] be two IV2TLPFNs, then
(1) 
if   S ( p ˜ 1 ) S ( p ˜ 2 ) , then   p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 ;
(2) 
if   S ( p ˜ 1 ) S ( p ˜ 2 ) , then   p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 ;
(3) 
if   S ( p ˜ 1 ) = S ( p ˜ 2 ) , H ( p ˜ 1 ) H ( p ˜ 2 ) ,   then   p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 ;
(4) 
if   S ( p ˜ 1 ) = S ( p ˜ 2 ) , H ( p ˜ 1 ) H ( p ˜ 2 ) , then   p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 ;
(5) 
if   S ( p ˜ 1 ) = S ( p ˜ 2 ) , H ( p ˜ 1 ) = H ( p ˜ 2 ) , then   p ˜ 1 = p ˜ 2 .
Definition 8.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) , ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) ] , [ ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) , ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) ] and p ˜ 2 = [ ( s ϕ 2 L , φ 2 L ) , ( s ϕ 2 R , φ 2 R ) ] , [ ( s χ 2 L , ξ 2 L ) , ( s χ 2 R , ξ 2 R ) ] be two IV2TLPFNs, then
(1)
p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 = { [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 2 L , φ 2 L ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 2 L , φ 2 L ) t ) 2 ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 2 R , φ 2 R ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 2 R , φ 2 R ) t ) 2 ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) t ) ( Δ 1 ( s χ 2 L , ξ 2 L ) t ) ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) t ) ( Δ 1 ( s χ 2 R , ξ 2 R ) t ) ) ] }
(2)
p ˜ 1 p ˜ 2 = { [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) t ) ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 2 L , φ 2 L ) t ) ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) t ) ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 2 R , φ 2 R ) t ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ 2 L , ξ 2 L ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s χ 2 L , ξ 2 L ) t ) 2 ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ 2 R , ξ 2 R ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) t ) 2 ( Δ 1 ( s χ 2 R , ξ 2 R ) t ) 2 ) ] }
(3)
λ p ˜ 1 = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) t ) 2 ) λ ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) t ) 2 ) λ ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) t ) λ ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) t ) λ ) ] } , λ > 0 ;
(4)
( p ˜ 1 ) λ = { [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 L , φ 1 L ) t ) λ ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ 1 R , φ 1 R ) t ) λ ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 L , ξ 1 L ) t ) 2 ) λ ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ 1 R , ξ 1 R ) t ) 2 ) λ ) ] } , λ > 0 .

2.5. Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators

Maclaurin [31] proposed the MSM operator.
Definition 9.
[31] Let x i ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of nonnegative real numbers, and k = ( 1 , 2 , , n ) . If
MSM ( k ) ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n j = 1 k x i j C n k ) 1 k
Then we called MSM ( k ) the Maclaurin symmetric mean operator, where ( i 1 , i 2 , , i k ) traverses all the k-tuple combinations of ( 1 , 2 , , n ) , C n k is the binomial coefficient.

3. Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy MSM and Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Weighted MSM Operators

3.1. The IV2TLPFMSM Operator

This section extends MSM and to fuse the IV2TLPFNs and proposes the Interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy MSM (IV2TLPFMSM) operator.
Definition 10.
Let p ˜ i = [ ( s ϕ i L , φ i L ) , ( s ϕ i R , φ i R ) ] , [ ( s χ i L , ξ i L ) , ( s χ i R , ξ i R ) ] be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The Interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy MSM (IV2TLPFMSM) operator:
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k p ˜ i j ) C n k ) 1 k
Theorem 2.
Let p ˜ i = [ ( s ϕ i L , φ i L ) , ( s ϕ i R , φ i R ) ] , [ ( s χ i L , ξ i L ) , ( s χ i R , ξ i R ) ] be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The aggregated value by using IV2TLPFMSM operators is also an IV2TLPFN where
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k p ˜ i j ) C n k ) 1 k = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k ) ] }
Proof. 
According to Definition 8, we can obtain
j = 1 k p ˜ i j = { [ Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) ) , Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) , Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) ] }
Thus,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k p ˜ i j ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) ] }
Thereafter,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k p ˜ i j ) C n k = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Therefore,
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k p ˜ i j ) C n k ) 1 k = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k ) ] }
Hence, (8) is kept.
Then we need to prove that (8) is an IV2TLPFN. We need to prove two conditions as follows:
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) [ 0 , t ]
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Let
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t = 1 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = 1 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k
Proof. 
① Since 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t 1 , we get
0 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 1   a n d   0 ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k 1
Then,
0 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k 1
0 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
That means 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t , so ① is maintained, similarly, we can get 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t .
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t ) 2 = ( ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 + ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k ) 2 = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k + 1 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ) 1 k 1
Example 1.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s 2 , 0.3 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.3 ) ] , p ˜ 2 = [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 3 , 0.3 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1 ) ] and p ˜ 3 = [ ( s 3 , 0.2 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.1 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2 ) ] be three IV2TLPFNs, and suppose k = 2 then according to (8), we have
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( 2 ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k p ˜ i j ) C n k ) 1 k = { [ Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 × ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 × ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 × ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 × ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 × ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 × ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] , [ Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] } = { [ ( s 2 , 0.3073 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2978 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.3758 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1288 ) ] }
Then we will discuss some properties of IV2TLPFMSM operator.
Property 1.
(Idempotency) If p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) are equal, that’s to say, p ˜ j = p ˜ = [ ( s L , φ L ) , ( s R , φ R ) ] , [ ( s L , ξ L ) , ( s R , ξ R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = p ˜
Property 2.
(Monotonicity) Let p ˜ x i = [ ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) , ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) ] , [ ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) , ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ y i = [ ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) ] , [ ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L ) , ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be two sets of IV2TLPFNs. If Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L )   a n d   Δ 1 ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) hold for all i , then
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ x 1 , p ˜ x 2 , , p ˜ x n ) IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ y 1 , p ˜ y 2 , , p ˜ y n )
Property 3.
(Boundedness) Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. If p ˜ + = { [ max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ min Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ = { [ min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ max Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) then
p ˜ IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) p ˜ +
Property 4.
(Commutativity) IfLet p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a collection of IV2TLPFNs, and p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) is any permutation of p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = IV 2 TLPFMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n )

3.2. The IV2TLPFWMSM Operator

In actual MADM, it is important to consider attribute weights. This section will propose interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted MSM (IV2TLPFWMSM) operator as follows.
Definition 11.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs with their weight vector be w i = ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n ) T , thereby satisfying w i [ 0 , 1 ] and i = 1 n w i = 1 . If
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) C n k ) 1 k
Then we called IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) the interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted MSM (IV2TLPFWMSM) operator.
Theorem 3.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The aggregated value by using IV2TLPFWMSM operators is also an IV2TLPFN where
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) C n k ) 1 k = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] }
Proof. 
According to Definition 8, we can obtain
n w i j p ˜ i j = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) n w i j ) ] }
Thus,
j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) = { [ Δ ( t j = 1 k 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t j = 1 k 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) , Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j r , ξ i j r ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) ] }
Thereafter,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j r , ξ i j r ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) ) ] }
Furthermore,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) C n k = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j r , ξ i j r ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Therefore,
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) C n k ) 1 k = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] }
Hence, (21) is kept.
Then we need to prove that (21) is an IV2TLPFN. We need to prove two conditions as follows
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) [ 0 , t ]
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Let
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t = ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k
① Since 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t 1 , we get
0 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j 1   a n d   0 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1
Then
0 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) 1
Furthermore,
0 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k 1
Therefore,
0 ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
That means 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t , so ① is maintained, similarly, we can get 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t .
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t ) 2 = ( ( 1 ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 + ( 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k
+ 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
Example 2.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s 2 , 0.3 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.3 ) ] , p ˜ 2 = [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 3 , 0.3 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1 ) ] and p ˜ 3 = [ ( s 3 , 0.2 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.1 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2 ) ] be three IV2TLPFNs, and suppose k = 2 , w = ( 0.2 , 0.3 , 0.5 ) then according to (21), we have
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( 2 ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) C n k ) 1 k = { [ Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] , }
= { [ Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 1.2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 1.8 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 1.2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 3 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 1.8 ) × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 3 ) ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 1.2 ) × ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 1.8 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 1.2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 3 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 1 , 8 ) × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 3 ) ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] } = { [ ( s 2 , 0.2565 ) , ( s 4 , 0.3954 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.2430 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1586 ) ] }
Then we will discuss some properties of IV2TLPFWMSM operator.
Property 5.
(Idempotency) If p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) are equal, then
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = p ˜
Property 6.
(Monotonicity) Let p ˜ x i = [ ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) , ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) ] , [ ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) , ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ y i = [ ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) ] , [ ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L ) , ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be two sets of IV2TLPFNs. If Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L )   a n d   Δ 1 ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) hold for all i , then
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ x 1 , p ˜ x 2 , , p ˜ x n ) IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ y 1 , p ˜ y 2 , , p ˜ y n )
Property 7.
(Boundedness) Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. If p ˜ + = { [ max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ min Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ = { [ min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ max Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) then
p ˜ IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) p ˜ +
Property 8.
(Commutativity) IfLet p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a collection of IV2TLPFNs, and p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) is any permutation of p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = IV 2 TLPFWMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n )

4. The Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Generalized MSM (IV2TLPFGMSM) and Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Weighted GMSM (IV2TLPFWGMSM) Operators

4.1. IV2TLPFGMSM Operator

Detemple and Robertson [40] proposed the generalized MSM (GMSM) considering the individual differences.
Definition 12.
[40] Let a i ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of nonnegative real numbers, and λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k 0 . A generalized MSM operator of dimension n is a mapping GMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) : ( R + ) n R , and it can be defined as follows:
GMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n j = 1 k x i j λ j C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j
Then we called GMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) the generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean (GMSM) operator, where ( i 1 , i 2 , , i k ) traverses all the k-tuple combinations of ( 1 , 2 , , n ) , C n k is the binomial coefficient.
In this section, we will propose the GMSM operator for IV2TLPFNs as follows.
Definition 13.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs and let λ = ( λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ n ) R n be a vector of parameters. If
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j
Then we called IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) the interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy generalized MSM (IV2TLPFGMSM) operator.
Theorem 4.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The aggregated value by using IV2TLPFGMSM operator is also an IV2TLPFN where
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] }
Proof. 
According to Definition 8, we can obtain
p ˜ i j λ j = { [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) λ j ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) ] }
Thus,
j = 1 k p ˜ i j λ j = { [ Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) λ j ) , Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) ] }
Thereafter,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j λ j ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k n ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 λ j ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) ] }
Furthermore,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j λ j ) C n k = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Therefore,
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] }
Hence, (37) is kept.
Then we need to prove that (37) is an IV2TLPFN. We need to prove two conditions as follows:
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) [ 0 , t ]
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Let
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j
① Since 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t 1 , we get
0 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j 1   a n d   0 ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1
Then
0 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k 1
Furthermore,
0 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k 1
Therefore,
0 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j 1
That means 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t , so ① is maintained, similarly, we can get 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t .
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t ) 2 = ( ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) 2 + ( 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) 2 = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j + 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j 1
Example 3.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s 2 , 0.3 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.3 ) ] , p ˜ 2 = [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 3 , 0.3 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1 ) ] and p ˜ 3 = [ ( s 3 , 0.2 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.1 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2 ) ] be three IV2TLPFNs, and suppose k = 2 , λ =   ( 1 , 2 ) then according to (37), we have
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j = { [ Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 × 1 × ( 1.4 6 ) 2 × 2 ) × ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 × 1 × ( 3.2 6 ) 2 × 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 × 1 × ( 3.2 6 ) 2 × 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 × 1 × ( 3.3 6 ) 2 × 2 ) × ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 × 1 × ( 3.6 6 ) 2 × 2 ) × ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 × 1 × ( 3.6 6 ) 2 × 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) ] , [ Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 2 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 2 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 2 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 2 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 2 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 2 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) ] } = { [ ( s 3 , 0.4725 ) , ( s 4 , 0.3675 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4634 ) , ( s 2 , 0.0223 ) ] }
Then we will discuss some properties of IV2TLPFGMSM operator.
Property 9.
(Idempotency) If p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) are equal, then
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = p ˜
Property 10.
(Monotonicity) Let p ˜ x i = [ ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) , ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) ] , [ ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) , ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ y i = [ ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) ] , [ ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L ) , ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be two sets of IV2TLPFNs. If Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L )   a n d   Δ 1 ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) hold for all i , then
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ x 1 , p ˜ x 2 , , p ˜ x n ) IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ y 1 , p ˜ y 2 , , p ˜ y n )
Property 11.
(Boundedness) Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. If p ˜ + = { [ max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ min Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ = { [ min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ max Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) then
p ˜ IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) p ˜ +
Property 12.
(Commutativity) IfLet p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a collection of IV2TLPFNs, and p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) is any permutation of p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = IV 2 TLPFGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n )

4.2. The IV2TLPFWGMSM Operator

In actual MADM, it is important to consider attribute weights; this section will propose an interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted generalized MSM (IV2TLPFWGMSM) operator as follows.
Definition 14.
Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs with their weight vector be w i = ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n ) T , thereby satisfying w i [ 0 , 1 ] and i = 1 n w i = 1 . If
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j
Then we called IV 2 TLPFWGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) the interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted generalized MSM (IV2TLPFWGMSM) operator.
Theorem 5.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The aggregated value by using IV2TLPFWGMSM operator is also an IV2TLPFN where
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] }
Proof. 
According to Definition 8, we can obtain
n w i j p ˜ i j = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) n w i j ) ] }
Thus,
( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) , Δ ( t ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) ] }
j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j = { [ Δ ( t j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) , Δ ( t j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) ] }
Thereafter,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) ) ] }
Furthermore,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j ) C n k = { [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Therefore,
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) ] }
Hence, (52) is kept.
Then we need to prove that (52) is an IV2TLPFN. We need to prove two conditions as follows:
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) [ 0 , t ]
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Let
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j
① Since 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t 1 , we get
0 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j 1   a n d   0 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j 1
Then
0 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k 1
Furthermore,
0 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k 1
Therefore,
0 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j 1
That means 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t , so ① is maintained, similarly, we can get 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t .
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t ) 2 = ( ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) 2 + ( 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j ) 2 = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j
+ 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) λ j ) 1 C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j 1
Example 4.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s 2 , 0.3 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.3 ) ] , p ˜ 2 = [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 3 , 0.3 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1 ) ] and p ˜ 3 = [ ( s 3 , 0.2 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.1 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2 ) ] be three IV2TLPFNs, and suppose k = 2 , λ = ( 1 , 2 ) , w = ( 0.2 , 0.3 , 0.5 ) then according to (52), we have
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( 2 , λ 1 , λ 2 ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) λ j ) C n k ) 1 j = 1 k λ j = { [ Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1.5 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) ] , }
= { [ Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 1.2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 1.8 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 1.2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 3 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 1.8 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.1 6 ) 3 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 1.2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 1.8 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 1.2 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 3 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 1.8 ) 1 × ( 1 ( 1.8 6 ) 3 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 1 + 2 ) ] } = { [ ( s 3 , 0.3535 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2764 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4452 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2175 ) ] }
Then we will discuss some properties of IV2TLPFWGMSM operator.
Property 13.
(Idempotency) If p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) are equal, then
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = p ˜
Property 14.
(Monotonicity) Let p ˜ x i = [ ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) , ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) ] , [ ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) , ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ y i = [ ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) ] , [ ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L ) , ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be two sets of IV2TLPFNs. If Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L )   a n d   Δ 1 ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) hold for all i , then
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ x 1 , p ˜ x 2 , , p ˜ x n ) IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ y 1 , p ˜ y 2 , , p ˜ y n )
Property 15.
(Boundedness) Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. If p ˜ + = { [ max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ min Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ = { [ min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ max Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) then
p ˜ IV 2 TLPFWGMSM n w ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) p ˜ +
Property 16.
(Commutativity) IfLet p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a collection of IV2TLPFNs, and p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) is any permutation of p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFWGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = IV 2 TLPFWGMSM ( k , λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n )

5. The IV2TLPFDMSM and IV2TLPFWDMSM Operators

5.1. IV2TLPFDMSM Operator

Qin and Liu [44] proposed the dual MSM (DMSM) operator considering both the MSM and the dual operation.
Definition 15.
[44] Let a i ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of nonnegative real numbers, and λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ k 0 . If
DMSM ( k ) ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k x i j ) 1 C n k )
Then we called DMSM ( k ) the dual Maclaurin symmetric mean (DMSM) operator, where ( i 1 , i 2 , , i k ) traverses all the k-tuple combinations of ( 1 , 2 , , n ) , C n k is the binomial coefficient.
In this section, we will propose the DMSM operator for IV2TLPFNs as follows.
Definition 16.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. If
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j ) 1 C n k )
Then we called IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) the interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy dual MSM (IV2TLPFDMSM) operator.
Theorem 6.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The aggregated value by using IV2TLPFDMSM operator is also an IV2TLPFN where
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j ) 1 C n k ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] }
Proof. 
According to Definition 8, we can obtain
j = 1 n p ˜ i j = { [ Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) , Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) ] , [ Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) ) , Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) ) ] }
Thus,
( j = 1 n p ˜ i j ) 1 C n k = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Thereafter,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j ) 1 C n k = { [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Furthermore,
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j ) 1 C n k ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] }
Hence, (69) is kept.
Then we need to prove that (69) is an IV2TLPFN. We need to prove two conditions as follows:
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) [ 0 , t ]
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Let
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k
① Since 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t 1 , we get
0 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) 1   a n d   0 ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1
Then
0 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k 1
Furthermore,
0 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
Therefore,
0 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
That means 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t , so ① is maintained, similarly, we can get 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t .
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t ) 2 = ( 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 + ( ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) ) 1 C n k ) 1 k + ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
Example 5.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s 2 , 0.3 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.3 ) ] , p ˜ 2 = [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 3 , 0.3 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1 ) ] and p ˜ 3 = [ ( s 3 , 0.2 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.1 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2 ) ] be three IV2TLPFNs, and suppose k = 2 , then according to (69), we have
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 n p ˜ i j ) 1 C n k ) = { [ Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] , [ Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 × ( 1.6 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 × ( 1.1 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 2 × ( 1.1 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 2 × ( 2.1 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 2 × ( 1.8 6 ) 2 ) × ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 2 × ( 1.8 6 ) 2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] } = { [ ( s 2 , 0.3799 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2775 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.3674 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1336 ) ] }
Then we will discuss some properties of IV2TLPFDMSM operator.
Property 17.
(Idempotency) If p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) are equal, then
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = p ˜
Property 18.
(Monotonicity) Let p ˜ x i = [ ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) , ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) ] , [ ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) , ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ y i = [ ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) ] , [ ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L ) , ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be two sets of IV2TLPFNs. If Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L )   a n d   Δ 1 ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) hold for all i , then
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ x 1 , p ˜ x 2 , , p ˜ x n ) IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ y 1 , p ˜ y 2 , , p ˜ y n )
Property 19.
(Boundedness) Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. If p ˜ + = { [ max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ min Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ = { [ min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ max Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) then
p ˜ IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) p ˜ +
Property 20.
(Commutativity) IfLet p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a collection of IV2TLPFNs, and p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) is any permutation of p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = IV 2 TLPFDMSM ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n )

5.2. The IV2TLPFWDMSM Operator

In actual MADM, it is important to consider attribute weights; this section will propose an interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted dual MSM (IV2TLPFWDMSM) operator as follows.
Definition 17.
Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs with their weight vector be w i = ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n ) T , thereby satisfying w i [ 0 , 1 ] and i = 1 n w i = 1 . If
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) 1 C n k )
Then we called IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) the interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted dual MSM (IV2TLPFWDMSM) operator.
Theorem 7.
Let p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of IV2TLPFNs. The aggregated value by using 2TLPFWDMSM operator is also an IV2TLPFN where
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) 1 C n k ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] }
Proof. 
According to Definition 8, we can obtain
n w i j p ˜ i j = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) n w i j ) ] }
Thus,
j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) ] , [ Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) n w i j ) , Δ ( t j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) n w i j ) ] }
Thereafter,
( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) 1 C n k = { [ Δ ( t ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Furthermore,
1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) 1 C n k = { [ Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) ] , [ Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) , Δ ( t 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) ] }
Therefore,
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) 1 C n k ) = { [ Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] , [ Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) , Δ ( t ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) ] }
Hence, (83) is kept.
Then we need to prove that (83) is an IV2TLPFN. We need to prove two conditions as follows:
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) , Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) [ 0 , t ]
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) ) 2 t 2 .
Let
Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j L , ξ i j L ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t = ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k
① Since 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t 1 , we get
0 ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j 1   a n d   0 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j 1
Then
0 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k 1
Furthermore,
0 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
Therefore,
0 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j L , φ i j L ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
That means 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ L , φ L ) t , so ① is maintained, similarly, we can get 0 Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ L , ξ L ) t , 0 Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t .
0 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ R , φ R ) t ) 2 + ( Δ 1 ( s χ R , ξ R ) t ) 2 = ( 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 + ( ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k ) 2 = 1 ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( 1 ( Δ 1 ( s ϕ i j R , φ i j R ) t ) 2 ) n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k
+ ( 1 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( 1 j = 1 k ( Δ 1 ( s χ i j R , ξ i j R ) t ) 2 n w i j ) 1 C n k ) 1 k 1
Example 6.
Let p ˜ 1 = [ ( s 2 , 0.3 ) , ( s 4 , 0.2 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.3 ) ] , p ˜ 2 = [ ( s 1 , 0.4 ) , ( s 3 , 0.3 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.4 ) , ( s 2 , 0.1 ) ] and p ˜ 3 = [ ( s 3 , 0.2 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4 ) ] , [ ( s 1 , 0.1 ) , ( s 2 , 0.2 ) ] be three IV2TLPFNs, and suppose k =   2 , w   =   ( 0.2 , 0.3 , 0.5 ) then according to (83), we have
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( 2 ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = 1 k ( 1 i 1 < < i k i n ( j = 1 k ( n w i j p ˜ i j ) ) 1 C n k )
= { [ Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 × ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 2.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 × ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1.2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 × ( 1 ( 3.2 6 ) 2 ) 1.2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 × ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 4.2 6 ) 2 ) 0.6 × ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1.2 ) × ( 1 ( 1 ( 3.3 6 ) 2 ) 0.9 × ( 1 ( 3.6 6 ) 2 ) 1.2 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] , [ Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 1.2 × ( 1.6 6 ) 1.8 ) × ( 1 ( 1.4 6 ) 1.2 × ( 1.1 6 ) 3 ) × ( 1 ( 1.6 6 ) 1.8 × ( 1.1 6 ) 3 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) , Δ ( 6 × ( 1 ( ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 1.2 × ( 2.1 6 ) 1.8 ) × ( 1 ( 1.7 6 ) 1.2 × ( 1.8 6 ) 3 ) × ( 1 ( 2.1 6 ) 1.8 × ( 1.8 6 ) 3 ) ) 1 3 ) 1 2 ) ] }
= { [ ( s 2 , 0.2817 ) , ( s 4 , 0.4935 ) ] , [ ( s 2 , 0.3329 ) , ( s 2 , 0.0829 ) ] }
Then we will discuss some properties of IV2TLPFWDMSM operator.
Property 21.
(Idempotency) If p ˜ j = [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) are equal, then
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = p ˜
Property 22.
(Monotonicity) Let p ˜ x i = [ ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) , ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) ] , [ ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) , ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ y i = [ ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) ] , [ ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L ) , ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) ] ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) be two sets of IV2TLPFNs. If Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i L , φ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i L , φ y i L ) , Δ 1 ( s ϕ x i R , φ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s ϕ y i R , φ y i R ) , Δ 1 ( s χ x i L , ξ x i L ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i L , ξ y i L )   a n d   Δ 1 ( s χ x i R , ξ x i R ) Δ 1 ( s χ y i R , ξ y i R ) hold for all i , then
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ x 1 , p ˜ x 2 , , p ˜ x n ) IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ y 1 , p ˜ y 2 , , p ˜ y n )
Property 23.
(Boundedness) Let p ˜ j = { [ ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a set of 2TLPFNs. If p ˜ + = { [ max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ min Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) and p ˜ = { [ min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j L , φ j L ) , min Δ 1 ( s ϕ j R , φ j R ) ] , [ max Δ 1 ( s χ j L , ξ j L ) , max Δ 1 ( s χ j R , ξ j R ) ] } ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) then
p ˜ IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) p ˜ +
Property 24.
(Commutativity) IfLet p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) be a collection of IV2TLPFNs, and p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) is any permutation of p ˜ j ( j = 1 , 2 , , n ) , then
IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n ) = IV 2 TLPFWDMSM n w ( k ) ( p ˜ 1 , p ˜ 2 , , p ˜ n )

6. Numerical Example and Comparative Analysis

6.1. Numerical Example

With the rapid development of economic globalization and the growing enterprise competition environment, the competition between modern enterprises has become the competition between supply chain and supply chain. The diversity of the people consumption concept, shorter new product life cycles, the volatility of demand market, and other external factors drive enterprises for effective supply chain integration and management, and strategic alliance with other enterprises in order to enhance core competitiveness and resist external risk. The key measure to achieving this goal is supplier selection. Therefore, the supplier selection problem has gained great attention in supply chain management theory and in actual production management problems. In practical supplier selection problems, there are a large number of uncertainties, such as the fuzziness of producers and consumers demand, fuzziness and dynamic of supplier supply capacity, risk from natural and man-made factors, visibility of the whole supply chain, etc. These uncertain factors have a great influence on actual assessment and selection. In order to properly deal with those uncertainty factors, thus, in this section we give an example to select green suppliers with IV2TLPFNs in order to show the method proposed. There are five possible green suppliers in the green supply chain management A i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) to select. The experts select four attributes to evaluate these green suppliers: ① G1 is the price factor; ② G2 is the delivery factor; ③ G3 is the environmental factors; ④ G4 is the product quality factor. The five possible green suppliers A i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) are to be assessed with 2TLPFNs by the decision maker according to these four attributes (whose weighting vector ω = ( 0.14 , 0.37 , 0.29 , 0.20 ) ), the IV2TLPFNs decision matrix as listed in Table 1.
Step 1. According to Table 1, we can aggregate all IV2TLPFNs r i j by using the IV2TLPFWMSM, IV2TLPFWGMSM (Suppose that P = ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) ), and IV2TLPFWDMSM operator to get the overall IV2TLPFNs A i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) of the green suppliers A i , then the aggregating results are shown in Table 2. ( k = 2 ) .
Step 2. According to the aggregating results listed in Table 2 and the score functions of the green suppliers are listed in Table 3.
Step 3. According to the score functions shown in Table 3 and the comparison formula of score functions, the ordering of the green suppliers is shown in Table 4. Note that “>” means “preferred to”. As we can see, depending on the aggregation operators used, the best green supplier is A3.

6.2. Influence of the Parameter on the Final Result

In order to show the effects on the ranking results by changing parameters of k in the IV2TLPFWMSM, IV2TLPFWGMSM, and IV2TLPFWDMSM operators, all the results are shown in Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7.

6.3. Comparative Analysis

Qin & Liu [44] developed the uncertain linguistic dual Maclaurin symmetric mean (ULDMSM) operator, the uncertain linguistic weighted dual Maclaurin symmetric mean (ULWDMSM) operator and the uncertain linguistic Choquet dual Maclaurin symmetric mean (ULCDMSM) operator, but these operators can only deal with uncertain linguistic membership. However, the IV2TLPFWMSM, IV2TLPFWGMSM, and IV2TLPFWDMSM operators which are proposed in this paper can deal with both uncertain linguistic membership and uncertain linguistic non-membership.
Garg [14] proposed the IVPFWA operator and IVPFWG operator to fuse interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (IVPFNs), but these operators for IVPFNs can only deal with both membership and non-membership of non-negative interval-valued numbers and cannot deal with both membership and non-membership of interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. However, the IV2TLPFWMSM, IV2TLPFWGMSM, and IV2TLPFWDMSM operators which are proposed in this paper can deal with both membership and non-membership of interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information.

7. Conclusions

In this paper, we propose a new class of fuzzy sets (FSs), which can be seen as an extension of PFSs, named IV2TLPFSs. They can satisfactorily reflect imprecise, incomplete, and inconsistent information in order to address decision-making situations that involve qualitative information rather than numerical information. At the same time, in recent years, a number of researchers have developed aggregation operators under various fuzzy environments and applied these to solve different decision-making problems. However, these aggregation operators have some drawbacks in actual applications, such as being unable to reflect the correlation of all input arguments. The MSM operator has an apparent advantage in that it can deal with the relationships between all the input arguments according to the parameter vector. Motivated by the ideal characteristic of the MSM operator, we utilize the MSM operator, GMSM operator, and DMSM operator to develop some MSM aggregation operators with IV2TLPFNs: Interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy MSM (IV2TLPFMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted MSM (IV2TLPFWMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy GMSM (IV2TLPFGMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted GMSM (IV2TLPFWGMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy DMSM (IV2TLPFDMSM) operator, interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted DMSM (IV2TLPFWDMSM) operator. The characteristics of these operators are also investigated. Then, we have used these operators to solve the MADM problems with IV2TLPFNs. At the same time, some comparative analysis is given. Finally, a practical example for green supplier selection is used to show the developed approach. In the future, the application of the proposed operators of IV2TLPFNs needs to be explored in the other uncertain [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] and fuzzy MADM [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].

Author Contributions

J.W., G.W.W. and H.G. conceived and worked together to achieve this work; J.W. compiled the computing program by Matlab and analyzed the data; J.W. and G.W. Wei wrote the paper. Finally, all the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71571128 and the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (17XJA630003) and the Construction Plan of Scientific Research Innovation Team for Colleges and Universities in Sichuan Province (15TD0004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Atanassov, K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986, 20, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Atanassov, K. Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000, 110, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8, 338–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yager, R.R. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In Proceedings of the Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 24–28 June 2013; pp. 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yager, R.R. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2014, 22, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, X.L.; Xu, Z.S. Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2014, 29, 1061–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peng, X.; Yang, Y. Some results for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2015, 30, 1133–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, P.; Xu, Z.; Gou, X. Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016, 42, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Garg, H. A New Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations and Its Application to Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2016, 31, 886–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, X. Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inf. Sci. 2016, 330, 104–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, T.-Y. Remoteness index-based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf. Fusion 2018, 41, 129–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, X.; Yang, Y. Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2016, 31, 989–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, S.; Chen, J.; Li, X. A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 2016, 15, 403–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Garg, H. A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 31, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, G.W. Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 2119–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, G.W.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Picture 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Soft Comput. 2018, 22, 989–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, G.W. Picture uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Kybernetes 2017, 46, 1777–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, G.W. Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, G.W. Picture 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 19, 997–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, G.W.; Lu, M.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1129–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, M.; Wei, G.W.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Bipolar 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1197–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, G.W. Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wei, G.W. Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2016, 7, 1093–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wei, G.W.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic arithmetic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wei, G.W.; Lu, M. Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yager, R.R. The power average operator. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part A 2001, 31, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Z.S.; Yager, R.R. Power-Geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2010, 18, 94–105. [Google Scholar]
  28. Garg, H. Complex Intuitionistic Fuzzy Power Aggregation Operators and Their Applications in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Expert Systems; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, G.W.; Zhao, X.F.; Wang, H.J.; Lin, R. Fuzzy power aggregating operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2013, 19, 377–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, G.W.; Lu, M. Pythagorean Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 1043–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maclaurin, C. A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser A 1729, 36, 59–96. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wan, S.; Jin, Z.; Dong, J. Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for multi-attribute group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2018, 55, 437–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, X.; Dai, J. Approaches to Pythagorean Fuzzy Stochastic Multi-criteria Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory and Regret Theory with New Distance Measure and Score Function. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017, 32, 1187–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Garg, H. A Linear Programming Method Based on an Improved Score Function for Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Numbers and Its Application to Decision-Making. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 2018, 26, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, T.-Y. An Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Outranking Method with a Closeness-Based Assignment Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 126–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garg, H. A Novel Improved Accuracy Function for Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Its Applications in the Decision-Making Process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017, 32, 1247–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, H. The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 56, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Herrera, F.; Martinez, L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2000, 8, 746–752. [Google Scholar]
  39. Herrera, F.; Martinez, L. An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model in decision-making. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 2000, 8, 539–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Detemple, D.; Robertson, J. On generalized symmetric means of two variables. Univ. Beograd. Publ. Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat. Fiz. 1979, No. 634/677. 236–238. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bapat, R.B. Symmetrical function means and permanents. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 1993, 182, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abu-Saris, R.; Hajja, M. On Gauss compounding of symmetric weighted arithmetic means. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 322, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cuttler, A.; Greene, C.; Skandera, M. Inequalities for symmetric means. Eur. J. Comb. 2011, 32, 745–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qin, J.D.; Liu, X.W. Approaches to uncertain linguistic multiple attribute decision making based on dual Maclaurin symmetric mean. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2015, 29, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wei, G.W.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Verma, R. Multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized trapezoid fuzzy linguistic prioritized weighted average operator. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2017, 8, 1993–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wei, G.W. Some similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 15, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
  48. Akram, M.; Shahzadi, S. Novel intuitionistic fuzzy soft multiple-attribute decision-making methods. Neural Comput. Appl. 2018, 29, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, G.W.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Projection models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2018, 9, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, T. The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 26, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, G.W.; Gao, H. The generalized Dice similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Informatica 2018, 29, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Park, J.H.; Kwark, H.E.; Kwun, Y.C. Entropy and Cross-entropy for Generalized Hesitant Fuzzy Information and Their Use in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017, 32, 266–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wei, G.; Wei, Y. Some single-valued neutrosophic dombi prioritized weighted aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Al-Quran, A.; Hassan, N. The Complex Neutrosophic Soft Expert Relation and Its Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method. Entropy 2018, 20, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gao, H.; Wei, G.W.; Huang, Y.H. Dual hesitant bipolar fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 11508–11522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, C.; Chen, S. A new multiple attribute decision making method based on linear programming methodology and novel score function and novel accuracy function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf. Sci. 2018, 438, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, Y.H.; Wei, G.W. TODIM Method for Pythagorean 2-tuple Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision Making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 901–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, S.; Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Wei, Y. Research on Construction Engineering Project Risk Assessment with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Hamy Mean Operators. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, J.; Wei, G.W.; Wei, Y. Models for Green Supplier Selection with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators. Symmetry 2018, 10, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Merigo, J.M.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M. Fuzzy induced generalized aggregation operators and its application in multi-person decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 9761–9772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Garg, H. Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multi attribute decision making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 1234–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, C.; Chen, S. Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inf. Sci. 2017, 397, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Garg, H. New Logarithmic operational laws and their aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy set and their applications. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 653–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wei, G.W.; Gao, H.; Wei, Y. Some q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 1426–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Garg, H. Some methods for strategic decision-making problems with immediate probabilities in Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 687–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mohagheghi, V.; Mousavi, S.M.; Vahdani, B. Enhancing decision-making flexibility by introducing a new last aggregation evaluating approach based on multi-criteria group decision making and Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 61, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Deng, X.M.; Wei, G.; Gao, H.; Wang, J. Models for safety assessment of construction project with some 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 52105–52137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Garg, H. Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and its applications to multiattribute decision making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gao, H. Pythagorean Fuzzy Hamacher Prioritized Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 2229–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Garg, H.; Arora, R. Novel scaled prioritized intuitionistic fuzzy soft interaction averaging aggregation operators and their application to multi criteria decision making. Eng. Appl. AI 2018, 71, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Garg, H. Confidence levels based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its application to decision-making process. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 2017, 23, 546–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baloglu, U.B.; Demir, Y. An Agent-Based Pythagorean Fuzzy Approach for Demand Analysis with Incomplete Information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 983–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tang, X.Y.; Wei, G.W. Models for green supplier selection in green supply chain management with Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic information. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 18042–18060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Lu, M. TODIM Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making under 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Environment. Symmetry 2018, 10, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hao, Y.; Chen, X. Study on the ranking problems in multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wei, G.W. Picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Fundam. Inform. 2018, 157, 271–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wei, G.W.; Gao, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.H. Research on Risk Evaluation of Enterprise Human Capital Investment with Interval-valued bipolar 2-tuple linguistic Information. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 35697–35712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Beliakov, G.; James, S.; Mordelov´a, J.; Ruckschlossov´a, T.; Yager, R.R. Generalized Bonferroni mean operators in multicriteria aggregation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2010, 161, 2227–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wei, G.W. Some cosine similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications to strategic decision making. Informatica 2017, 28, 547–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Garg, H. Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Using Einsteint-Norm and t-Conorm for Multicriteria Decision-Making Process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017, 32, 597–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Garg, H. Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 5275–5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wei, G.W.; Wei, Y. Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on cosine function and their applications. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 634–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Garg, H. Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng. Appl. AI 2017, 60, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Smarandache, F. Neutrosophic Perspectives: Triplets, Duplets, Multisets, Hybrid. Operators, Modal Logic., Hedge Algebras. And Applications; Amazon.com: Seattle, WA, USA, 2017; Pons Editions, 1st ed.; June 2017; 324p. 2nd ed.; September 2017; 346p. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. The interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy number decision matrix.
Table 1. The interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy number decision matrix.
G 1 G 2
A1{[(s2,0),(s3,0)],[(s1,0),(s2,0)]}{[(s2,0),(s4,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}
A2{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}{[(s2,0),(s3,0)],[(s1,0),(s2,0)]}
A3{[(s3,0),(s4,0)],[(s1,0),(s2,0)]}{[(s3,0),(s5,0)],[(s1,0),(s2,0)]}
A4{[(s2,0),(s3,0)],[(s1,0),(s2,0)]}{[(s2,0),(s3,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}
A5{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}{[(s2,0),(s4,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}
G 3 G 4
A1{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s1,0),(s3,0)]}{[(s2,0),(s3,0)],[(s1,0),(s2,0)]}
A2{[(s2,0),(s3,0)],[(s1,0),(s4,0)]}{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}
A3{[(s3,0),(s4,0)],[(s2,0),(s4,0)]}{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}
A4{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s1,0),(s3,0)]}{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s2,0),(s3,0)]}
A5{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s1,0),(s4,0)]}{[(s1,0),(s2,0)],[(s1,0),(s3,0)]}
Table 2. The operation results by the IV2TLPFWMSM, IV2TLPFWGMSM, and IV2TLPFWDMSM operators.
Table 2. The operation results by the IV2TLPFWMSM, IV2TLPFWGMSM, and IV2TLPFWDMSM operators.
Aggregation OperatorGreen SupplierOperation Results
IV2TLPFWMSMA1{[(s1,0.4990),(s3,−0.3639)],[(s2,0.0079),(s3,0.2511)]}
A2{[(s1,0.4130),(s2,0.2682)],[(s2,0.3463),(s4,−0.2297)]}
A3{[(s2,0.2948),(s3,0.4641)],[(s2,0.3800),(s4,−0.4372)]}
A4{[(s1,0.3026),(s2,0.1673)],[(s2,0.0079),(s3,0.4758)]}
A5{[(s1,0.1226),(s2,0.2467)],[(s2,0.2644),(s4,−0.0822)]}
IV2TLPFWGMSMA1{[(s4,0.2143),(s5,−0.2477)],[(s1,0.0561),(s2,−0.1623)]}
A2{[(s4,0.1090),(s5,−0.4737)],[(s1,0.1838),(s2,0.0989)]}
A3{[(s5,−0.4698),(s5,0.1698)],[(s1,0.2394),(s2,0.−0307)]}
A4{[(s4,0.0031),(s5,0.−4490)],[(s1,0.0561),(s2,−0.0399)]}
A5{[(s4,−0.1988),(s5,−0.3714)],[(s1,0.1872),(s2,0.2531)]}
IV2TLPFWDMSMA1{[(s2,−0.4993),(s3,−0.3427)],[(s2,0.0023),(s3,0.2460)]}
A2{[(s1,0.3906),(s2,0.2675)],[(s2,0.3993),(s4,−0.2651)]}
A3{[(s2,0.3027),(s3,0.4920)],[(s2,0.3663),(s4,−0.4670)]}
A4{[(s1,0.3020),(s2,0.1752)],[(s2,0.0023),(s3,0.4677)]}
A5{[(s1,0.1240),(s2,0.2680)],[(s2,0.2492),(s4,−0.0989)]}
Table 3. The score functions of the green suppliers.
Table 3. The score functions of the green suppliers.
IV2TLPFWMSMIV2TLPFWGMSMIV2TLPFWDMSM
A10.68000.86930.6809
A20.64240.84090.6421
A30.70170.88910.7042
A40.65770.84890.6582
A50.63370.83910.6354
Table 4. Ordering of the green suppliers.
Table 4. Ordering of the green suppliers.
MethodsOrdering
IV2TLPFWMSMA3>A1>A4>A2>A5
IV2TLPFWGMSMA3>A1>A4>A2>A5
IV2TLPFWDMSMA3>A1>A4>A2>A5
Table 5. Ranking results for different operational parameters of the IV2TLPFWMSM operator.
Table 5. Ranking results for different operational parameters of the IV2TLPFWMSM operator.
s(A1)s(A2)s(A3)s(A4)s(A5)Ordering
K = 10.69090.67170.73660.66550.6567A3>A1>A2>A4>A5
K = 20.68000.64240.70170.65770.6337A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 30.67550.62860.68840.65390.6243A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 40.67240.62100.67480.65140.6176A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
Table 6. Ranking results for different operational parameters of the IV2TLPFWGMSM operator.
Table 6. Ranking results for different operational parameters of the IV2TLPFWGMSM operator.
s(A1)s(A2)s(A3)s(A4)s(A5)Ordering
K = 10.49480.47290.51840.47230.4537A3>A1>A2>A4>A5
K = 20.86930.84090.88910.84890.8391A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 30.81400.78210.83830.79140.7766A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 40.75730.73370.79060.73910.7205A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
Table 7. Ranking results for different operational parameters of the IV2TLPFWDMSM operator.
Table 7. Ranking results for different operational parameters of the IV2TLPFWDMSM operator.
s(A1)s(A2)s(A3)s(A4)s(A5)Ordering
K = 10.67240.62100.67480.65140.6176A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 20.68090.64210.70420.65820.6354A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 30.68630.65800.71950.66220.6465A3>A1>A4>A2>A5
K = 40.69090.67170.73660.66550.6567A3>A1>A2>A4>A5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Gao, H. Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Mathematics 2018, 6, 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100201

AMA Style

Wang J, Wei G, Gao H. Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Mathematics. 2018; 6(10):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100201

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jie, Guiwu Wei, and Hui Gao. 2018. "Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Information" Mathematics 6, no. 10: 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100201

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop