Next Article in Journal
Controlled Metric Type Spaces and the Related Contraction Principle
Previous Article in Journal
Tunneling Time in Attosecond Experiments and Time Operator in Quantum Mechanics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Some Inequalities Involving Liouville–Caputo Fractional Derivatives and Applications to Special Means of Real Numbers

1
Nonlinear Analysis Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
3
Department of Mathematics, College of Education in Jubail, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 12020, Jubail 31961, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2018, 6(10), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100193
Submission received: 3 September 2018 / Revised: 1 October 2018 / Accepted: 2 October 2018 / Published: 8 October 2018

Abstract

:
We are concerned with the class of functions f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , a , b R , a < b , such that c D a α f is convex or c D b α f is convex, where 0 < α < 1 , c D a α f is the left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order α of f and c D b α f is the right-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order α of f. Some extensions of Dragomir–Agarwal inequality to this class of functions are obtained. A parallel development is made for the class of functions f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) such that c D a α f is concave or c D b α f is concave. Next, an application to special means of real numbers is provided.

1. Introduction

Let 0 < α < 1 and a , b R be such that a < b . We consider the classes of functions
Conv a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) = f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) : c D a α f is   Convex ;
Conv b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) = f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) : c D b α f is   Convex ;
Conc a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) = f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) : c D a α f is   concave ;
Conc b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) = f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) : c D b α f is   concave ,
where c D a α f is the left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order α of f and c D b α f is the right-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order α of f. In this paper, we extend Dragomir–Agarwal inequality to the above classes of functions. Next, we provide an application to the special means of real numbers.
Let us mention some motivations for studying the proposed problems. Let f : I R be a given function, where I is a certain interval of R , and let a , b I be such that a < b . If f is convex in I, then
f a + b 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 .
Inequality (5) is known in the literature as Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality (see [1,2]). Several improvements and extensions of inequality (5) to different types of convexity were established by many authors. In this direction, we refer the reader to [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] and the references therein. In [9], Dragomir and Agarwal established the following interesting result, which provides an estimate between the difference between the middle and right terms in inequality (5).
Theorem 1 (Dragomir–Agarwal inequality).
Let f : I R be a given function, where I is a certain interval of R , and let a , b I be such that a < b . If f is differentiable in I ˚ and | f | is convex in [ a , b ] , then
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) 8 .
The main idea for proving Theorem 1 is based on the following lemma [9].
Lemma 1.
Let f : I R be a given function, where I is a certain interval of R , and let a , b I be such that a < b . If f is differentiable in I ˚ and f L 1 ( ] a , b [ ; R ) , then
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x = b a 2 0 1 ( 1 2 t ) f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t .
In [10], Pearce and Pečarić extended Theorem 1 to the case when | f | is concave. Using Lemma 1 and Jensen integral inequality, they obtained the following interesting result.
Theorem 2.
Let f : I R be a given function, where I is a certain interval of R , and let a , b I be such that a < b . If f is differentiable in I ˚ and | f | is concave in [ a , b ] , then
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x b a 4 f a + b 2 .
Motivated by the above cited works, our aim in this paper is to extend Theorems 1 and 2 to the classes of functions given by (1)–(4).
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some basic concepts on fractional calculus. In Section 3, we state and prove our main results. In Section 4, an application to special means of real numbers is provided.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some basic notions on fractional calculus. For more details, we refer the reader to [11,12].
First, let us fix a , b R with a < b .
Definition 1.
The left-side Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order σ > 0 of a function f C ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is given by
I a σ f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( σ ) a x ( x t ) σ 1 f ( t ) d t , a < x b ,
where Γ denotes the Gamma function.
Definition 2.
The right-side Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order σ > 0 of a function f C ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is given by
I b σ f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( σ ) x b ( t x ) σ 1 f ( t ) d t , a x < b .
Lemma 2.
Let σ > 0 and f C ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
I a σ f ( a + ) = I b σ f ( b ) = 0 ,
where
I a σ f ( a + ) = lim x a + I a σ f ( x )
and
I b σ f ( b ) = lim x b I b σ f ( x ) .
Furthermore, for σ > 0 and f C ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , we set
I a σ f ( a ) = I a σ f ( a + ) = 0
and
I b σ f ( b ) = I b σ f ( b ) = 0 .
Lemma 3.
Let f C ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
lim σ 0 + I a σ f ( x ) = f ( x ) , a < x b
and
lim σ 0 + I b σ f ( x ) = f ( x ) , a x < b .
Lemma 4.
Let σ > 0 and f , g C ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
a b I a σ f ( x ) g ( x ) d x = a b I b σ g ( x ) f ( x ) d x .
Definition 3.
The left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order 0 < α < 1 of a function f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is given by
c D a α f ( x ) = I a 1 α f , a < x b .
Definition 4.
The right-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order 0 < α < 1 of a function f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is given by
c D b α f ( x ) = I b 1 α f , a < x b .
The following result is an immediate consequence of Lemma 2.
Lemma 5.
Let 0 < α < 1 and f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
c D a α f ( a + ) = c D b α f ( b ) = 0 ,
where
c D a α f ( a + ) = lim x a + c D a α f ( x )
and
c D b α f ( b ) = lim x b c D b α f ( x ) .
Furthermore, for 0 < α < 1 and f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , we set
c D a α f ( a ) = c D a α f ( a + ) = 0 ,
and
c D b α f ( b ) = c D b α f ( b ) = 0 .
The following result is an immediate consequence of Lemma 3.
Lemma 6.
Let f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
lim α 1 c D a α f ( x ) = f ( x ) , a < x b
and
lim α 0 + c D b α f ( x ) = f ( x ) , a x < b .
The following result provides sufficient conditions for the convexity and concavity of c D a α f (see [13]).
Lemma 7.
Let 0 < α < 1 and f C 3 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . If f ( x ) 0 in [ a , b ] , f ( a ) 0 and f ( a ) 0 , then c D a α f is concave in [ a , b ] . If f ( x ) 0 in [ a , b ] , f ( a ) 0 and f ( a ) 0 , then c D a α f is convex in [ a , b ] .
Using Lemma 7, we deduce the following criteria for the convexity and concavity of c D a α f .
Lemma 8.
Let 0 < α < 1 and f C 3 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) be such that
f ( x ) 0 , a x b .
If f ( x ) 0 in [ a , b ] and f ( a ) 0 , then c D a α f is concave in [ a , b ] . If f ( x ) 0 in [ a , b ] and f ( a ) 0 , then c D a α f is convex in [ a , b ] .
Proof. 
We have just to observe that, by (7), we have
c D a α f ( x ) 0 , a x b .
Next, using Lemma 7, the desired results follow. ☐

3. Results and Discussion

In this section, we state and prove our main results. Just before, let us fix 0 < α < 1 and a , b R with a < b .
First, we shall establish the following fractional version of Lemma 1.
Lemma 9.
Let f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
b a 2 0 1 ( 1 2 t ) ( c D a α f ) ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t = α f ( a ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I a 1 α f ( b ) 1 b a I a 2 α f ( b ) .
Proof. 
By the definition of the left-side Liouville–Caputo fractional derivative of order α, we have
a b x a + b 2 ( c D a α f ) ( x ) d x = a b x a + b 2 ( I a 1 α f ) ( x ) d x .
Using the integration by parts rule given by Lemma 4, we obtain
a b x a + b 2 ( c D a α f ) ( x ) d x = a b f ( x ) I b 1 α x a + b 2 d x .
Next, the standard integration by parts rule yields
a b x a + b 2 ( c D a α f ) ( x ) d x = f ( x ) I b 1 α x a + b 2 x = a b a b f ( x ) d d x I b 1 α x a + b 2 d x .
On the other hand, by the definition of the right-side Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order 1 α , we have
I b 1 α x a + b 2 = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) x b ( t x ) α t a + b 2 d t = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) x b t ( t x ) α d t a + b 2 x b ( t x ) α d t = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) 1 1 α t ( t x ) 1 α t = x b 1 1 α x b ( t x ) 1 α d t ( a + b ) 2 ( 1 α ) ( b x ) 1 α = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) b ( b x ) 1 α 1 α ( b x ) 2 α ( 1 α ) ( 2 α ) ( a + b ) 2 ( 1 α ) ( b x ) 1 α .
Using the identity
s Γ ( s ) = Γ ( s + 1 ) , s > 0 ,
we obtain
I b 1 α x a + b 2 = ( b x ) 1 α Γ ( 2 α ) b a 2 b x 2 α ,
which yields
f ( x ) I b 1 α x a + b 2 x = a b = α f ( a ) ( b a ) 2 α 2 Γ ( 3 α )
and
d d x I b 1 α x a + b 2 = ( b x ) 1 α Γ ( 2 α ) b a 2 ( b x ) α Γ ( 1 α ) .
Using (11), we obtain
a b f ( x ) d d x I b 1 α x a + b 2 d x = 1 Γ ( 2 α ) a b ( b x ) 1 α f ( x ) d x b a 2 1 Γ ( 1 α ) a b ( b x ) α f ( x ) d x ,
i.e.,
a b f ( x ) d d x I b 1 α x a + b 2 d x = ( I a 2 α f ) ( b ) b a 2 ( I a 1 α f ) ( b ) .
Next, combining (9), (10) and (12), we obtain
1 b a a b x a + b 2 ( c D a α f ) ( x ) d x = α f ( a ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 ( I a 1 α f ) ( b ) 1 b a ( I a 2 α f ) ( b ) .
Finally, the change of variable
x = t a + ( 1 t ) b , 0 t 1 ,
yields (8). ☐
Remark 1.
Passing to the limit as α 1 in (8) and using Lemmas 3 and 6, we obtain (6).
Using a similar argument as in the proof of Lemma 9, we obtain the following fractional version of Lemma 1.
Lemma 10.
Let f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
b a 2 0 1 ( 1 2 t ) ( c D b α f ) ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t = α f ( b ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I b 1 α f ( a ) 1 b a I b 2 α f ( a ) .
Remark 2.
Passing to the limit as α 1 in (13) and using Lemmas 3 and 6, we obtain (6).
Our first main result is the following fractional version of Theorem 1.
Theorem 3.
Let f C o n v a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , where C o n v a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is the class of functions given by (1). Then,
α f ( a ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I a 1 α f ( b ) 1 b a ( I a 2 α f ) ( b ) ( b a ) 8 c D a α f ( b ) .
Proof. 
Let f Conv a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Using Lemma 9, we obtain
α f ( a ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I a 1 α f ( b ) 1 b a ( I a 2 α f ) ( b ) b a 2 0 1 | 1 2 t | c D a α f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t .
On the other hand, using the convexity of c D a α f , we obtain
b a 2 0 1 | 1 2 t | c D a α f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t b a 2 ( c D a α f ) ( a ) 0 1 | 1 2 t | t d t + ( c D a α f ) ( b ) 0 1 | 1 2 t | ( 1 t ) d t .
Using the fact that ( c D a α f ) ( a ) = 0 and
0 1 | 1 2 t | ( 1 t ) d t = 1 4 ,
we obtain
b a 2 0 1 | 1 2 t | c D a α f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t ( b a ) 8 c D a α f ( b ) .
Finally, combining (15) and (16), we obtain (14). ☐
Next, we discuss the case when f Conv b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , where Conv b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is the class of functions given by (2).
Theorem 4.
Let f C o n v b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
α f ( b ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I b 1 α f ( a ) 1 b a ( I b 2 α f ) ( a ) ( b a ) 8 c D b α f ( a ) .
Proof. 
Using Lemma 10, the convexity of | c D b α f | and a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 3, we obtain (17). ☐
Furthermore, we consider the case when f Conc a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , where Conc a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is the class of functions given by (3). We obtain the following fractional version of Theorem 2.
Theorem 5.
Let f C o n c a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
α f ( a ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I a 1 α f ( b ) 1 b a ( I a 2 α f ) ( b ) ( b a ) 4 c D a α f a + b 2 .
Proof. 
Using the concavity of | c D a α f | and Jensen integral inequality, we obtain
b a 2 0 1 | 1 2 t | c D a α f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t b a 2 0 1 | 1 2 t | d t | c D a α f | 0 1 | 1 2 t | ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t 0 1 | 1 2 t | d t = ( b a ) 4 c D a α f a + b 2 .
Using Lemma 9 and the above inequality, (18) follows. ☐
Using a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 5, we obtain the following result concerning the case when f Conc b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , where Conc b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) is the class of functions given by (4).
Theorem 6.
Let f C o n c b α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Then,
α f ( b ) ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I b 1 α f ( a ) 1 b a ( I b 2 α f ) ( a ) ( b a ) 4 c D b α f a + b 2 .
Remark 3.
Let us consider the classes of functions
C o n v 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) = f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) : | f | i s   c o n v e x .
Observe that
C o n v 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) C o n v a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) .
To show this, let us consider as example the function
f ( x ) = ( x a ) β , a x b ,
where
α + 1 β < 2 .
We have f C 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Moreover,
| f ( x ) | = β ( x a ) β 1 , a x b .
It can be easily seen that | f | is concave (so, nonconvex). On the other hand, we have
| ( c D a α f ) ( x ) | = Γ ( β + 1 ) Γ ( β + 1 α ) ( x a ) β α , a x b ,
which is a convex function in [ a , b ] . Therefore, f C o n v a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) but f C o n v 1 ( [ a , b ] ; R ) . Hence, Theorem 3 is a real extension of Theorem 1.

4. Applications to Special Means of Real Numbers

In this section, we provide some applications to special means of real numbers. Let
A ( u , v ) = u + v 2 , u , v R .
The quantity A ( u , v ) is known in the literature as the arithmetic mean of u and v. Let
L σ ( u , v ) = v σ + 1 u σ + 1 ( σ + 1 ) ( v u ) 1 σ , σ > 1 , σ 0 , 0 < u < v .
The quantity L σ ( u , v ) can be considered as a fractional generalized ln-mean of u and v.
We have the following estimate.
Corollary 1.
Let 1 β 2 and 0 < a < b . Then,
A ( a β , b β ) [ L β ( a , b ) ] β β ( b a ) b β 1 8 .
Proof. 
Let 1 β 2 and 0 < a < b . Let us consider the function
f ( x ) = x β , a x b .
Using Lemma 8, we deduce that | c D a α f | is convex in [ a , b ] , for every 0 < α < 1 . Hence,
f Conv a α ( [ a , b ] ; R ) , 0 < α < 1 .
Therefore, using Theorem 3, for all 0 < α < 1 , we obtain
α a β ( b a ) 1 α 2 Γ ( 3 α ) + 1 2 I a 1 α f ( b ) 1 b a ( I a 2 α f ) ( b ) ( b a ) 8 c D a α f ( b ) .
Passing to the limit as α 1 in (21) and using Lemmas 3 and 6, we obtain (19). ☐
Remark 4.
Let us consider the case 1 < β < 2 . In this case, by (ii) and (iv), we have | f | is concave in [ a , b ] , where f is the function given by (20). Therefore, Theorem 1 cannot be applied. On the other hand, by Theorem 2, we have
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x b a 4 f a + b 2 ,
i.e.,
A ( a β , b β ) [ L β ( a , b ) ] β β ( b a ) 4 a + b 2 β 1 .
Observe that
β ( b a ) b β 1 8 < β ( b a ) 4 a + b 2 β 1 .
Therefore, the estimate (19) is sharper than (22).
Remark 5.
Let us consider the case β = 2 . In this case, | f | is convex in [ a , b ] , where f is the function given by (20) ( f ( x ) = x 2 ). Therefore, by Theorem 1, we have
A ( a 2 , b 2 ) [ L 2 ( a , b ) ] 2 b 2 a 2 4 .
On the other hand, taking β = 2 in (19), we obtain
A ( a 2 , b 2 ) [ L 2 ( a , b ) ] 2 ( b a ) b 4 .
Observe that
( b a ) b 4 < b 2 a 2 4 .
Therefore, (24) is sharper than (23).

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beckenbach, E.F. Convex functions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1948, 54, 439–460. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitrinović, D.S.; Lacković, I.B. Hermite and convexity. Aequ. Math. 1985, 28, 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bombardelli, M.; Varošanec, S. Properties of h-convex functions related to the Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér inequalities. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 1869–1877. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dragomir, S.S.; Pearce, C.E.M. Quasi-convex functions and Hadamard’s inequality. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1998, 57, 377–385. [Google Scholar]
  5. Farissi El, A. Simple proof and refeinment of Hermite-Hadamard inequality. J. Math. Inequal. 2010, 4, 365–369. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rajba, T. On strong delta-convexity and Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for delta-convex functions of higher order. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 18, 267–293. [Google Scholar]
  7. Samet, B. On an implicit convexity concept and some integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Saglam, A.; Yildirim, H. On some Hadamard-type inequalities for h-convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2008, 2, 335–341. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two inequities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pearce, C.E.M.; Pečarić, J. Inequalities for differentiable mappings with application to special means and quadrature formulm. Appl. Math. Lett. 2000, 13, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  11. Almeida, R. A Caputo fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2017, 44, 460–481. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  12. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. In North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou, X.F.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, W. Monotonicity, Concavity, and Convexity of Fractional Derivative of Functions. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samet, B.; Aydi, H. On Some Inequalities Involving Liouville–Caputo Fractional Derivatives and Applications to Special Means of Real Numbers. Mathematics 2018, 6, 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100193

AMA Style

Samet B, Aydi H. On Some Inequalities Involving Liouville–Caputo Fractional Derivatives and Applications to Special Means of Real Numbers. Mathematics. 2018; 6(10):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samet, Bessem, and Hassen Aydi. 2018. "On Some Inequalities Involving Liouville–Caputo Fractional Derivatives and Applications to Special Means of Real Numbers" Mathematics 6, no. 10: 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6100193

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop