Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Mathematical Model of Salmonellosis Transmission and the Role of Contaminated Environments and Food Products
Previous Article in Journal
The Gyrokinetic Limit for the Two-Dimensional Vlasov–Yukawa System with a Point Charge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polynomial Identities for Binomial Sums of Harmonic Numbers of Higher Order

1
Faculty of Education, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
2
Stat-Math Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 8th Mile Mysore Road, Bangalore 560059, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(2), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020321
Submission received: 24 December 2024 / Revised: 10 January 2025 / Accepted: 15 January 2025 / Published: 20 January 2025

Abstract

:
We study the formulas for binomial sums of harmonic numbers of higher order k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( r ) j = 1 n D r ( n , j ) q j j . Recently, Mneimneh proved that D 1 ( n , j ) = 1 . In this paper, we find several different expressions of D r ( n , j ) for r 1 .
MSC:
11B65; 11A07; 05A10; 11B50; 11B73

1. Introduction

For a positive integer r, define the n-th harmonic number of order r by
H n ( r ) : = i = 1 n 1 i r .
When r = 1 , H n = H n ( 1 ) is the original harmonic number. In this paper, we study the formula
k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( r ) j = 1 n D r ( n , j ) q j j .
In [1], for a positive integer n and 0 q 1 , it is shown that D 1 ( n , j ) = 1 . Namely,
k = 0 n H k n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n j = 1 n q j j .
This relation is derived by the author from an interesting probabilistic analysis. The identity (2) is a generalization of
k = 0 n H k n k = 2 n H n j = 1 n 1 j 2 j ,
which has been proved in [2] in the field of symbolic computation and in [3] in finite differences. The identity (2) is a special case of a general result of Boyadzhiev [4]:
k = 1 n n k a k b n k H k = ( a + b ) n H n b ( a + b ) n 1 + b 2 2 ( a + b ) n 2 + + b n n .
In addition, Boyadzhiev’s main result (3) has been generalized in [5] to multiple harmonic-like numbers.
The main aim of this paper is to show several different expressions of D r ( n , j ) as no simple form has been found.
In fact, more different generalizations of (1) or (2) can be considered. For example, recently, in [6], the so-called hyperharmonic number generalizes the harmonic number of the order r in the formula. In [7], more generalized sums and their application to multiple polylogarithms are given. In [8], some expressions of Mneimneh-type binomial sums are established, involving multiple harmonic-type sums in terms of finite sums of Stirling numbers, Bell numbers, and some related variables, and a conjecture is proposed. Then, in [9], this conjecture is resolved and generalized, and the transformation of generalized Mneimneh-like sums is presented. When we generalize too much, a lot of interesting and essential properties may be lost. Therefore, we do not consider further generalized harmonic numbers in this paper.

2. Observation

By using the harmonic numbers to express D r ( n , j ) , for 1 r 7 , we can manually obtain the following. Some initial trials for r = 1 , 2 , 3 are given below.
D 1 ( n , j ) = 1 , D 2 ( n , j ) = H n H n j , D 3 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 2 2 + H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 , D 4 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 3 6 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 + H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) 3 , D 5 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 4 4 ! + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 4 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 3 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 8 + H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) 4 , D 6 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 5 5 ! + ( H n H n j ) 3 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 12 + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 6 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 8 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) 4 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 6 + H n ( 5 ) H n j ( 5 ) 5 , D 7 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 6 6 ! + ( H n H n j ) 4 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 48 + ( H n H n j ) 3 ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 18 + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 16 + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) ) 8 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 6 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 5 ) H n j ( 5 ) ) 5 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 3 48 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) ( H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) ) 8 + ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 2 18 + H n ( 6 ) H n j ( 6 ) 6 .
It is interesting to observe that the number of terms of each of the right-hand sides of D r ( n , j ) is equal to the number of partitions of r ( 1 r 7 ), respectively. In addition, the same terms of generalized harmonic numbers appear in [10,11]
n = 1 H n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 2 ) 2 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 ( H n ) 3 3 H n H n ( 2 ) + 2 H n ( 3 ) 3 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 ( H n ) 4 6 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 2 ) + 8 H n H n ( 3 ) + 3 ( H n ( 2 ) ) 2 6 H n ( 4 ) 4 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 1 5 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) ( ( H n ) 5 10 ( H n ) 3 H n ( 2 ) + 20 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 3 ) + 15 H n ( H n ( 2 ) ) 2 30 H n H n ( 4 ) 20 H n ( 2 ) H n ( 3 ) + 24 H n ( 5 ) ) = 1 , n = 1 1 6 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) ( ( H n ) 6 15 ( H n ) 4 H n ( 2 ) + 40 ( H n ) 3 H n ( 3 ) + 45 ( H n ) 2 ( H n ( 2 ) ) 2 90 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 4 ) 120 H n H n ( 2 ) H n ( 3 ) + 144 H n H n ( 5 ) 15 ( H n ( 2 ) ) 3 + 90 H n ( 2 ) H n ( 4 ) + 40 ( H n ( 3 ) ) 2 120 H n ( 5 ) ) = 1 .

Some Initial Trials

For observation, we calculate the expressions of D r ( n , j ) for small r, one by one, using the method in [12]. Here, we mention the cases for r = 1 , 2 , 3 .
When r = 1 , we find the following relation. Thus, by Theorem 1 in the next section, we can obtain D 1 ( n , j ) = 1 .
Lemma 1. 
l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l = 1 .
When r = 2 , we find the following relation. Here, ( n ) j = n ( n 1 ) ( n j + 1 ) ( j 1 ) is the falling factorial with ( n ) 0 = 1 , and n k denotes the (unsigned) Stirling number of the first kind, arising from the relation ( x ) n = k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k x k .
Lemma 2. 
l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 n l = H n H n j = 1 ( n ) j ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 ( ν + 1 ) j ν + 1 n ν .
Note that
n l 1 n j n l 1 n l l + 1 ( n ) j j l + 1 n l .
Hence, we have the following formula.
Corollary 1. 
k = 0 n H k ( 2 ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( 2 ) j = 1 n ( H n H n j ) q j j   = H n ( 2 ) j = 1 n 1 ( n ) j ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 ( ν + 1 ) j ν + 1 n ν q j j .
Proof of Lemma 1. 
Put
A ( n , j ) = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l , B ( n , j ) = l = 0 j ( 1 ) j l n l n j n l .
Since
B ( n + 1 , j ) = n + 1 n j + 1 B ( n , j ) = ( n + 1 ) n ( n j + 1 ) ( n j ) B ( n 1 , j ) = = ( n + 1 ) n ( j + 1 ) ( n j + 1 ) ! B ( j , j ) = ( n + 1 ) ! ( n j + 1 ) ! j ! l = 0 j ( 1 ) j l j l = n + 1 j ( 1 1 ) j = 0 ,
we have
A ( n , j + 1 ) A ( n , j ) = B ( n , j ) = 0 .
Hence, we obtain
A ( n , j ) = A ( n , j 1 ) = = A ( n , 1 ) = ( 1 ) 0 n 1 n 1 n 0 = 1 .
Proof of Lemma 2. 
The Formula (5) is yielded from the definition of the Stirling numbers of the first kind:
( x ) j = k = 0 j ( 1 ) j k j k x k = ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 j ν + 1 x ν + 1 ( if j 1 ) .
Differentiatingboth sides with respect to x gives
( x ) j l = 0 j 1 1 x l = ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 ( ν + 1 ) j ν + 1 x ν .
Thus, the right-hand side of (5) is equal to
l = 0 j 1 1 n l = H n H n j .
Put the left-hand side of (5) as
C ( n , j ) : = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 n l .
Then,
C ( n , j ) C ( n , j 1 ) = l = 0 j 2 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l + n l 1 n j + 1 n l 1 n l + n j 1 1 n j + 1 = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l n j + 1 n l 1 n l = n j 1 l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 n l .
Now,
l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 n l = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l x n l 1 d x x = 1 = x n 1 1 1 x j 1 d x x = 1 = 1 1 x j F 1 2 ( j + 1 , n j + 1 ; n j + 2 ; x ) ( x 1 ) j ( n j + 1 ) x = 1 = Γ ( j ) Γ ( n j + 2 ) ( n j + 1 ) Γ ( n + 1 ) = ( j 1 ) ! ( n j ) ! n ! ,
where F 1 2 ( a , b ; c ; z ) is the Gauss hypergeometric function. Hence,
C ( n , j ) C ( n , j 1 ) = 1 n j + 1 .
Therefore,
C ( n , j ) = C ( n , j 1 ) + 1 n j + 1 = C ( n , j 2 ) + 1 n j + 2 + 1 n j + 1 = = C ( n , 1 ) + 1 n 1 + + 1 n j + 2 + 1 n j + 1 = l = 0 j 1 1 n l .
When r = 3 , we have the following.
Lemma 3. 
l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) 2 = ( H n H n j ) 2 2 + H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 .
Therefore, we have the following formula.
Corollary 2. 
k = 0 n H k ( 3 ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( 3 ) j = 1 n ( H n H n j ) 2 2 + H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 q j j .
Proof of Lemma 3. 
Put
D ( n , j ) : = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) 2 .
Then,
D ( n , j ) D ( n , j 1 ) = n j 1 l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 ( n l ) 2 .
Weshall prove that
D ( n , j ) D ( n , j 1 ) = 1 n j + 1 ( H n H n j ) .
By (9), we obtain
D ( n , j ) = H n n j + 1 H n j n j + 1 + H n n j + 2 H n j + 1 n j + 2 + + H n n 1 H n 2 n 1 + H n n H n 1 n = H n 1 n j + 1 + 1 n j + 2 + + 1 n 1 + 1 n H n j n j + 1 + H n j + 1 n j + 2 + + H n 2 n 1 + H n 1 n = H n ( H n H n j ) H n 2 H n ( 2 ) 2 H n j 2 H n j ( 2 ) 2 = ( H n H n j ) 2 2 + H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 .
In order to prove (9), we put
E ( n , j ) = ( n j + 1 ) D ( n , j ) D ( n , j 1 ) .
Then, by (8) and Lemma 1 (4), we have
E ( n , j ) E ( n , j 1 ) = 1 n j + 1 l = 0 j 2 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l + 1 n j + 1 n j 1 = 1 n j + 1 l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l = 1 n j + 1 .
Hence, by D ( n , 1 ) = 1 / n 2 , we obtain
D ( n , j ) D ( n , j 1 ) = E ( n , j ) n j + 1 = 1 n j + 1 1 n j + 1 + 1 n j + 2 + + 1 n 1 + E ( n , 1 ) = 1 n j + 1 ( H n H n j ) .
which is the right-hand side of (9). □

3. Expressions (Main Results)

Let n , j , r be positive integers.
Theorem 1. 
D r ( n , j ) = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) r 1 .
Theorem 2. 
For r 1 ,
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = j 1 = 1 j j 2 = 1 j 1 j r = 1 j r 1 1 ( n j 1 + 1 ) ( n j 2 + 1 ) ( n j r + 1 ) .
D r ( n , j ) ( r 2 ) can be expressed in terms of the determinant [13] ([Ch. I S2]). See also [14,15].
Theorem 3. 
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = 1 r ! H n H n j 1 0 0 H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) H n H n j 2 0 H n ( r 1 ) H n j ( r 1 ) H n ( r 2 ) H n j ( r 2 ) H n ( r 3 ) H n j ( r 3 ) r + 1 H n ( r ) H n j ( r ) H n ( r 1 ) H n j ( r 1 ) H n ( r 2 ) H n j ( r 2 ) H n H n j .
Remark 1. 
By using the inversion formula (see, e.g., ([Lemma 1] [16]), ([13] (p. 28)) regarding (12) below, we also have
( 1 ) r 1 ( H n ( r ) H n j ( r ) ) = D 2 ( n , j ) 1 0 0 2 D 3 ( n , j ) D 2 ( n , j ) 1 0 ( r 1 ) D r ( n , j ) D r 1 ( n , j ) D r 2 ( n , j ) 1 r D r + 1 ( n , j ) D r ( n , j ) D r 1 ( n , j ) D 2 ( n , j ) .
D r ( n , j ) ( r 2 ) can be expressed by a combinatorial sum ([Proposition 1 (17)] [11]):
Theorem 4. 
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = i 1 + 2 i 2 + 3 i 3 + = r 1 i 1 ! i 2 ! i 3 ! H n H n j 1 i 1 H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 i 2 H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) 3 i 3 .
Remember that the (complete exponential) Bell polynomial Y n ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) is defined by
exp m = 1 x m t m m ! = 1 + n = 1 Y n ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) t n n !
(see, e.g., ([Ch.3.3] [17])). That is,
Y n ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) = k = 1 n n ! i 1 ! i 2 ! i n k + 1 ! x 1 1 ! i 1 x 2 2 ! i 2 x n k + 1 ( n k + 1 ) ! i n k + 1
with Y 0 = 1 . Here, the second sum satisfies the following conditions:
i 1 + 2 i 2 + 3 i 3 + + ( n k + 1 ) i n k + 1 = n , i 1 + i 2 + i 3 + = k .
Theorem 5. 
For r 1 , we have
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = 1 r ! Y r H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , .

4. Proof

Proof of Theorem 1. 
We shall show that
k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( r ) j = 1 n n j l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 ( n l ) r q j .
We have
k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k l = 0 k ( 1 ) k l k l q n l = l = 0 n q n l n l k = l n ( 1 ) k l n l n k H k ( r ) = j = 0 n n j q j ν = 0 j ( 1 ) j ν j ν H n ν ( r ) = H n ( r ) j = 1 n ( 1 ) j 1 n j q j ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν l = 0 n 1 1 ( n l ) r .
Since
ν = 0 l ( 1 ) ν j ν = ( 1 ) l j 1 l ( proved by induction on l ( 0 ) )
and
ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν = ( 1 1 ) j = 0 ,
we have
ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν l = 0 n 1 1 ( n l ) r = l = 0 j 1 ν = 0 l ( 1 ) ν j ν 1 ( n l ) r + l = j n 1 ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν 1 ( n l ) r = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) l j 1 l 1 ( n l ) r .
By (10),
D r ( n , j ) = j ! n j l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 ( n l ) r = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) r 1 .
Proof of Theorem 2. 
By Theorem 1,
D r ( n , j ) D r ( n , j 1 ) = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j + n l 1 n j + 1 n l 1 ( n l ) r 1 = 1 n j + 1 l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) r 2 = D r 1 ( n , j ) n j + 1 .
Hence, by D r ( n , 0 ) = 0 , we have
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = D r + 1 ( n , j 1 ) + D r ( n , j ) n j + 1 = D r + 1 ( n , j 2 ) + D r ( n , j 1 ) n j + 2 + D r ( n , j ) n j + 1 = = j 1 = 1 j D r ( n , j 1 ) n j 1 + 1 = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 D r 1 ( n , j 2 ) n j 2 + 1 = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 1 n j 2 + 1 j 3 = 1 j 2 D r 2 ( n , j 3 ) n j 3 + 1 = = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 1 n j 2 + 1 j r = 1 j r 1 D 1 ( n , j r ) n j r + 1 = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 1 n j 2 + 1 j r = 1 j r 1 1 n j r + 1 .
In order to prove Theorem 4 and Theorem 3, we need the following relations.
Lemma 4. 
For the sequences { p n } n 1 and { h n } n 1 , we have
( 1 ) n 1 p n = h 1 1 0 0 2 h 2 h 1 1 3 h 3 h 2 1 n h n h n 1 h 2 h 1 n ! h n = p 1 1 0 0 p 2 p 1 2 p 3 p 2 0 n + 1 p n p n 1 p 2 p 1 = i 1 + 2 i 2 + + n i n i 1 , i 2 , , i n 0 n ! i 1 ! i 2 ! i n ! p 1 1 i 1 p 2 2 i 2 p n n i n .
Proof. 
The last identity is a simple modification of Trudi’s formula (([18] (Volume 3, p. 214)), [19]):
a 1 a 0 0 a 2 a 1 a n 1 a n 2 a 1 a 0 a n a n 1 a 2 a 1 = i 1 + 2 i 2 + + n t n = n ( i 1 + + i n ) ! i 1 ! i n ! ( a 0 ) n i 1 i n a 1 i 1 a 2 i 2 a n i n .
Notice that the expansion of the second determinant is equivalent to the following relation:
n h n = i = 1 n p i h n 1 with h 0 = 1 .
Byapplying the inversion formula (see, e.g., ([Lemma 1] [16])), we can obtain the first identity. □
Proof of Theorem 3. 
The determinant in Theorem 3 is equivalent to the recurrence relation:
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = 1 r i = 1 r ( H n ( r i + 1 ) H n j ( r i + 1 ) ) D i ( n , j ) .
Byapplying the relation (11) in the first identity of the second part of Lemma 4 to (12), we can obtain the desired determinant identity. The identity of this remark can be given from the first part of Lemma 4. □
Proof of Theorem 4. 
The result follows from the second part of Lemma 4 by setting h r = D r + 1 ( n , j ) and p i = H n ( i ) H n j ( i ) , satisfying (12). □
Proof of Theorem 5. 
Since Bell polynomials satisfy the following recurrence relation:
Y r ( x 1 , x 2 , , x r ) = i = 1 r r 1 i 1 x r i + 1 Y i 1 ( x 1 , x 2 , , x i 1 )
(see, e.g., [17]), by setting x = ( 1 ) ! ( H n ( ) H n j ( ) ) , we have
1 r ! Y r H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , = 1 r i = 1 r ( H n ( r i + 1 ) H n j ( r i + 1 ) ) × Y i 1 H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , ( i 1 ) ! .
Since
D 2 ( n , j ) = H n H n j = Y 1 H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , ,
for r 1 , we can write the form in Theorem 5. □

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, T.K. and B.S.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the referees for carefully reading the manuscript and providing some important related papers. This work was partly completed during the first author’s visit to the Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore, India, in July–August 2023. He is grateful for the second author’s hospitality.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mneimneh, S. A binomial sum of harmonic numbers. Discrete Math. 2023, 346, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paule, P.; Schneider, C. Computer proofs of a new family of harmonic number identities. Adv. Appl. Math. 2003, 31, 359–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Spivey, M.Z. Combinatorial sums and finite differences. Discret. Math. 2007, 307, 3130–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boyadzhiev, K.N. Harmonic number identities via Euler’s transform. J. Integer Seq. 2009, 12, 8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Adegoke, K.; Frontczak, R. Combinatorial identities with multiple harmonic-like numbers. AppliedMath 2024, 4, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Komatsu, T.; Wang, P. A generalization of Mneimneh’s binomial sum of harmonic numbers. Discret. Math. 2024, 347, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gencev, M. Generalized Mneimneh sums and their application to multiple polylogarithms. Discret. Math. 2025, 348, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pan, E.; Xu, C. Mneimneh-type binomial sums of multiple harmonic-type sums. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.17952. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gencev, M. Pan-Xu conjecture and reduction formulas for polylogarithms. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.16148. [Google Scholar]
  10. Choi, J. Summation formulas involving binomial coefficients, harmonic numbers, and generalized harmonic numbers. Abst. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoffman, M.E. Harmonic-number summation identities, symmetric functions, and multiple zeta values. Ramanujan J. 2017, 42, 501–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sury, B. Sum of the reciprocals of the binomial coefficients. Eur. J. Comb. 1993, 14, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. MacDonald, I.G. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, X.; Chu, W. The Gauss 2F1(1)-summation theorem and harmonic number identities. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2009, 20, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coppo, M.; Candelpergher, B. The Arakawa-Kaneko zeta function. Ramanujan J. 2010, 22, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Komatsu, T. Bernoulli numbers with level 2. Aequat. Math. 2024; online first. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics; Dordrecht, D., Ed.; Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  18. Muir, T. The Theory of Determinants in the Historical Order of Development. Four Volumes; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  19. Trudi, N. Intorno ad alcune Formole di Sviluppo; Facsimile Publisher: Delhi, India, 1862; pp. 135–143. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Komatsu, T.; Sury, B. Polynomial Identities for Binomial Sums of Harmonic Numbers of Higher Order. Mathematics 2025, 13, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020321

AMA Style

Komatsu T, Sury B. Polynomial Identities for Binomial Sums of Harmonic Numbers of Higher Order. Mathematics. 2025; 13(2):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Komatsu, Takao, and B. Sury. 2025. "Polynomial Identities for Binomial Sums of Harmonic Numbers of Higher Order" Mathematics 13, no. 2: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020321

APA Style

Komatsu, T., & Sury, B. (2025). Polynomial Identities for Binomial Sums of Harmonic Numbers of Higher Order. Mathematics, 13(2), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13020321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop