Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between generalized orthogonality and Gâteaux derivative of the norm in a normed linear space. It is shown that the Gâteaux derivative of x in the y direction is zero when the norm is Gâteaux differentiable in the y direction at x and x and y satisfy certain generalized orthogonality conditions. A case where x and y are approximately orthogonal is also analyzed and the value range of the Gâteaux derivative in this case is given. Moreover, two concepts are introduced: the angle between vectors in normed linear space and the coordinate system in a smooth Minkowski plane. Relevant examples are given at the end of the paper.
Keywords:
Gâteaux derivative; isosceles orthogonality; Birkhoff orthogonality; approximate orthogonality MSC:
46B20; 46G05; 49J50
1. Introduction
Generalized orthogonality plays an important role in the study of normed linear spaces. It can generalize important conclusions from inner product spaces to normed linear spaces. Many scholars have extended different forms of orthogonality in inner product spaces to normed linear spaces [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], such as Birkhoff orthogonality [1] and Roberts orthogonality [2]. With the in-depth study of generalized orthogonality theory, the concept of approximate orthogonality has also been proposed [13,14,15]. Since the norm is a non-negative function, it is of great importance to study the Gâteaux derivative of the norm. Abatzoglou T. J. introduced the concept of the Gâteaux derivative of a norm in a real normed linear space in 1979 (see [16]). In 2005, Kečkié D. J. gave a definition of the Gâteaux derivative of the B(H)-norm of all bounded linear operators in Hilbert spaces and characterized the Birkhoff orthogonality by this result (see [17]). In 2009, Alsina C. and Sikorska J. presented the characteristics of the norm derivatives in the inner product space (see [18]). In 2023, Wójcik P. and Zamani A. established the relation between the -module and the norm derivative and the orthogonal in Hilbert spaces (see [19]). With the in-depth study of generalized orthogonality, this paper tries to combine various generalized orthogonality, approximate orthogonality, and the Gâteaux derivative in normed linear space and finds that some interesting conclusions can be drawn.
2. Preliminaries
Let be a normed linear space, and is the dual space of X. The sets and are called the unit ball and unit sphere. A real finite-dimensional normed linear space is called a Minkowski space, and a two-dimensional Minkowski space is called a Minkowski plane. A normed linear space X is called an inner product space if the norm on X is induced by an inner product, i.e., if there exists an inner product on X such that , . If two vectors x and y satisfy , let us call x orthogonal to y, and we write . However, no such binary relation exists in the normed linear space. Thus, it is necessary to extend the orthogonal relation in the inner product space to the normed linear space and call it generalized orthogonality. Although the various forms of generalized orthogonality are different in normed linear spaces, they are the same in inner product spaces. The following describes the generalized orthogonal relations used in this paper. Let be the set of all real numbers, , and x is said to be Birkhoff orthogonal [1] to y (denoted by ) if
x is said to be Robert orthogonal [2] to y (denoted by ) if
x is said to be isosceles orthogonal [10] to y (denoted by ) if
x is said to be Pythagorean orthogonal [10] to y (denoted by ) if
x is said to be orthogonal [12] to y (denoted by ) if
Compared with generalized orthogonality, approximate orthogonality in normed linear spaces has more relaxed conditions. The following is the concept of approximate orthogonality used in this paper. x is said to be -Birkhoff orthogonal [13] to y (denoted by ) if
x is said to be Birkhoff- orthogonal [14] to y (denoted by ) if
x is said to be -Robert orthogonal [15] to y (denoted by ) if
The following is the definition of the semi-inner product (S.I.P.) (see [20]), which is a generalization of the inner product and is more widely used in the inner product space. Let Y be a real linear space. Each pairing of points is a real number . The real number satisfies these properties:
- (i)
- , ;
- (ii)
- , ;
- (iii)
- , , ;
- (iv)
- , ;
- (v)
- , .
Then, Y is said to be an S.I.P. space, is said to be an S.I.P. of Y. If is an S.I.P. on X, and holds for ; then, is said to be a generating norm S.I.P.
Let X be a normed linear space, be the unit sphere of X, , ,
We refer to and as the right and left Gâteaux derivatives of the norm at x in the direction of y (see [21]). If
is true, we consider the norm to be differentiable in the y direction at x, where represents the derivative of the norm in the y direction at x. If the norm is differentiable at x in any direction y, we say that the norm is differentiable at x. Regarding orthogonality related to S.I.P., we say that x is Lumer orthogonal [13] to y (denoted by ) if
Let , and let there exist a unique bounded linear functional at x such that holds; then, x is said to be a smooth point of [22]. If each point of is smooth, then X is said to be smooth.
3. Results
3.1. Relationship between Orthogonality, Approximate Orthogonality, and Gâteaux Derivative
To demonstrate the validity of the theorems presented in this section, we must employ the two lemmas established by prior scholars.
Lemma 1.
Let X be a normed linear space, . , be two columns of vectors in X, , and . For any natural number , if is true, then .
Proof of Lemma 1.
The proof that is true is simply the proof that
is true. The equation
obtained by is true, i.e.,
then, is proven. □
Lemma 2.
Let X be a normed linear space, . , be two columns of vectors in X, , . For any natural number , if is true, then .
Proof of Lemma 2.
The proof of is simply the proof that the equation
is true. The equation
obtained by is true, i.e.,
then is proven. □
Theorem 1.
Let X be a normed linear space, , . If the norm at x is Gâteaux differentiable along the direction y, then , and any of the following conditions are sufficient: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) there exists an S.I.P. of the generating norm on X such that .
Proof of Theorem 1.
- (i)
- Since , it follows that , which implies . Consequently,that is, . Similarly,
such that is . Since the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along the y direction, we have
hence .
- (ii)
- Due to , the equation holds, thusThen,Let ; then, we can obtainAs the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along y direction, then
- (iii)
- The expression is needed in the process of solving the derivative of Gâteaux at x along the y direction of the norm , but does not exist in the definition of Pythagorean orthogonality. To calculate the derivative of Gâteaux of norm along the y direction at x, we need to construct and it needs to satisfy . The methods of construction are shown in the following.
We need to construct two columns of vectors , and .
Let , , and , where is a monotonically decreasing sequence, , and . Subsequently, we can calculate
and
From the above, we can obtain .
Then, under the condition of Pythagorean orthogonality, we begin to solve for the value of the Gâteaux derivative of the norm at x in the y direction.
From Lemma 1, we know that if , is true, i.e., the equation
is true. Then, we can deduce
from it, i.e.,
Consequently,
Therefore,
that is, . Likewise, let , but is a monotonically increasing sequence, and . Then, , .
Hence, . As the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along the y direction, then
- (iv)
- The expression is needed in the process of solving the derivative of the Gâteaux at x along the y direction of the norm , but does not exist in the definition of isosceles orthogonality. To calculate the derivative of the Gâteaux of the norm along the y direction at x, we need to construct and it needs to satisfy . The methods of construction are shown in the following.We need to construct two columns of vectors and and .
Let , and , where is a monotonically decreasing sequence, and . Subsequently, we can calculate
and
From the above, we can obtain .
Then, under the condition of isosceles orthogonality, we begin to solve for the value of the Gâteaux derivative of the norm at x in the y direction.
From Lemma 2, we know that if , is true, i.e., the equation
is true. Then, we can deduce
from it, i.e.,
Consequently,
that is, . Similarly, let
but is a monotonically increasing sequence, , and . Then, , . Thus, . As the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along the y direction, then
- (v)
- There exists an S.I.P. on X that generates the norm , sotherefore,Moreover, as the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along the y direction, we haveIn summary, .□
Theorem 2.
Let X be a normed linear space, , . If , then the norm is Gâteaux differentiable in the y direction at x and .
Proof of Theorem 2.
Since , it follows that
When , it is obviously true. Next, we discuss the case of .
then . Likewise,
then . From the above, we obtain
Then, the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along the y direction and . □
Theorem 3.
Let X be a normed linear space, . If and the norm at x is Gâteaux differentiable along the direction y, then , .
Proof of Theorem 3.
According to , we have
When , we have
that is,
Then,
Similarly, when , we have
that is,
Thus,
Since the norm is Gâteaux differentiable at x along the y direction, then
Due to , then , where . □
Theorem 4.
Let X be a normed linear space, , and . If the norm is Gâteaux derivable in the y direction at x, then .
Proof of Theorem 4.
From , we can obtain
Subsequently, we can acquire
and
In conclusion, is evident. □
Theorem 5.
Let X be a normed linear space, If and the norm at x are Gâteaux differentiable along the y direction, then .
Proof of Theorem 5.
From , we infer that
The following is divided into two cases.
Case 1: .
According to the inequality (1), we obtain
From the inequality (2), we obtain
which implies
Then, we can derive
that is, . Similarly, we can derive
that is, .
Because the norm at x is Gâteaux differentiable along the y direction, then .
Case 2: .
According to the inequality (1), we obtain
From the inequality (3), we obtain
which implies
Then,
that is, . Similarly, we can obtain
that is, .
Because the norm at x is Gâteaux differentiable along the y direction, then .
In summary, when and the norm at x are Gâteaux differentiable along the y direction, we can obtain . □
3.2. The Angle between Vectors in a Normed Linear Space
Definition 1.
Let X be a normed linear space, . The norm is Gâteaux differentiable along the direction y at x, and exists. The cosine of the angle between x and y is the value of θ, the angle between x and y is .
From Theorems 1 and 2, it follows that if x and y satisfy the relation , , , , , , then the angle between x and y is . However, the situation is different if x and y are approximately orthogonality. According to Theorems 3 and 4, when x and y satisfy the relations and , the angle between x and y is .
Definition 2.
Let X be a smooth Minkowski plane, . Take the line where the vector x is as the x-axis, the positive direction of the x-axis is the direction of the vector x, the line where the vector y is as the y-axis, and the positive direction of the y-axis is the direction of the vector y, x and y satisfy ( includes , , , , ,). Only one orthogonality can exist in this coordinate system; then, x and y form an coordinate system.
Remark 1.
For any vector z in X, there exists such that satisfies the relation:
If the coordinate system is the coordinate system, for any vectors a and b in X. If the equation is satisfied, then the vectors a and b are said to be orthogonal in this coordinate system and the angle between them is , the angle θ between x and y in this coordinate system has the value range . When selecting a coordinate system, it is important to consider its properties and how they relate to generalized orthogonality in different situations.
Some classical orthogonality coordinate systems are selected and some examples are given below:
Example 1.
When is selected as the coordinate system and the norm is , our orientation vector x is ; then, the orientation vector y is . The angle between vector x and vector y can be obtained by calculating .
Example 2.
When is selected as the coordinate system and the norm is , our orientation vector x is . The orientation vector y is , and the angle between vector x and vector y can be calculated as .
Example 3.
When is chosen as the coordinate system and the norm is , our orientation vector x is . The orientation vector y is , where , the calculated angle between vector x and vector y is .
Example 4.
When is selected as the coordinate system and the norm is , our orientation vector x is . The orientation vector y is , and the angle between vector x and vector y can be calculated as .
Example 5.
When is selected as the coordinate system and the norm is , our orientation vector x is . The orientation vector y is , and the angle between vector x and vector y can be calculated as .
4. Conclusions
The Gâteaux derivative of the norm in a normed linear space is investigated in this paper under the framework of generalized orthogonality and approximate orthogonality theories. By applying the definition of the norm’s Gâteaux derivative, we obtain the value of the norm’s Gâteaux derivative at a point for various kinds of generalized orthogonality. Likewise, we derive the value range of the norm’s Gâteaux derivative at a point by combining different kinds of approximate orthogonality with the definition of the norm’s Gâteaux derivative. Moreover, we introduce the concept of the angle between two vectors in normed linear space and construct a coordinate system on a smooth Minkowski plane. We also present several examples of classical orthogonality and coordinate systems. In future work, we aim to further explore the interplay between generalized orthogonality and approximate orthogonality and the norm’s Gâteaux derivative, as well as more applications of coordinate systems on the Minkowski plane, to deepen our insight into generalized positive intersection.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.X.; methodology, H.Z. and D.J.; software, P.X. and H.Z.; validation, H.Z. and P.X.; formal analysis, P.X. and D.J.; investigation, P.X. and H.Z.; resources, D.J.; data curation, P.X.; writing—original draft preparation, P.X.; writing—review and editing, P.X.; visualization, H.Z. and D.J.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, H.Z. and D.J.; funding acquisition, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number No. 11571085.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the referee for valuable suggestions and comments.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Birkhoff, G. Orthogonality in linear metric spaces. Duke Math. J. 1935, 1, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, B.D. On the geometry of abstract vector spaces. Tohoku Math. J. 1934, 39, 42–59. [Google Scholar]
- Carlsson, S.O. Orthogonality in normed linear spaces. Ark. För Mat. 2008, 10, 297–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diminnie, C.R. A new orthogonality relation for normed linear spaces. Math. Nachrichten 1983, 114, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brahim, B. Orthogonalité et caractérisation des espaces pré hilbertien. Ann. Mathématiques Québec 2000, 24, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Diminnie, C.R.; Andalafte, E.Z.; Freese, R.W. Angles in normed linear spaces and a characterization of real inner product spaces. Math. Nachrichten 1986, 129, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javier, A.; Carlos, B. Orthogonality in normed linear spaces: A survey. II. Relations between main orthogonalities. Extr. Math. 1989, 4, 121–131. [Google Scholar]
- Alsina, C.; Guijarro, P.; Tomas, M.S. A Characterization of inner-product spaces based on orthogonal relations related to heights theorem. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1995, 25, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diminnie, C.R.; Freese, R.W.; Andalafte, E.Z. An extension of Pythagorean and isosceles orthogonality and a characterization of inner-product spaces. J. Approx. Theory 1983, 39, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, R.C. Orthogonality in normed linear spaces. Duke Math. J. 1945, 12, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, J.; Benítez, C. Complements on Diminnie orthogonality. Math. Nachrichten 1994, 165, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, J.; Benitez, C. Some characteristic and non-characteristic properties of inner product spaces. J. Approx. Theory 1988, 55, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Chmieliński, J. On an ε-Birkhoff orthogonality. J. Inequalities Pure Appl. Math. 2005, 6, 79. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, C.J.; Liu, Q.; Li, Y.J. A new approximate Birkhoff orthogonality type. Eur. J. Math. Anal. 2022, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamani, A.; Moslehian, M.S. Approximate Roberts orthogonality. Aequationes Math. 2015, 89, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abatzoglou, T.J. Norm derivatives on spaces of operators. Math. Ann. 1979, 239, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kečkić, D.J. Gâteaux derivative of B(H) norm. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2005, 133, 2061–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsina, C.; Sikorska, J.; Tomas, S.M. Norm Derivatives and Characterizations of Inner Product Spaces; World Scientific Publishing Company: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 15–29. [Google Scholar]
- Wójcik, P.; Zamani, A. From norm derivatives to orthogonalities in Hilbert C*-modules. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2023, 71, 857–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lumer, G. Semi-inner-product spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1961, 100, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, R.C. Orthogonality and linear functionals in normed linear Spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1947, 61, 265–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmes, R.B. Geometric Functional Analysis and Its Applications; Springer: Heidelberg, NY, USA, 1975; pp. 164–176. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).