Abstract
We offer intriguing new insights into parameterized finite binomial sums, revealing elegant identities such as , where are non-negative integers and is the harmonic number. These formulas beautifully capture the intricate relationship between harmonic numbers and binomial coefficients, providing a fresh and captivating perspective on combinatorial sums.
MSC:
11F67; 11F99; 33B15
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
By using a known identity and mathematical induction, Sun [1] proved the following remarkable identity: For ,
Here and elsewhere, denotes the set of positive integers. Sofo and Batır [2] provided an alternate representation to Equation (1): For , the following identity holds:
Here and throughout, denotes the classical harmonic number, defined as
and . In this article, an empty sum is conventionally interpreted as zero wherever it appears. Indeed, they went further by deriving a general formula for the sums
Here and throughout, denotes the set of integers greater than or equal to some integer . Additional specific instances of (4), including (2), when and , yield the following identities:
and
1.1. Main Results
In this work, we present a new perspective on parameterized finite binomial sums, with the main results provided herein.
Theorem 1 extends identity (6) by incorporating a parameter t, which can be any complex number. This extension allows for the derivation of numerous other intriguing identities based on different choices of the parameter t.
Theorem 1.
Let and . Then, the following identity holds:
The particular case when gives the following identity:
Theorem 2 presents a novel finite summation identity involving the binomial coefficient, the harmonic number, and a parameter t, which can be any complex number. This identity enables the derivation of numerous other intriguing identities through various choices of the parameter t.
Theorem 2.
Let and . Then,
The particular case gives
1.2. Required Functions, Notations, and Lemmas
To support our objectives, we revisit the definitions and properties of certain special functions and numbers. The well-known gamma function, , is given by
where denotes the real part of a complex number z. The gamma function can be analytically continued to the entire complex plane, except at the non-positive integers, where it has simple poles (refer to [3] (Section 1.1)). The psi function, also known as the digamma function, is denoted by , and is defined as the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function:
The polygamma function is defined by
where , and is the generalized (or Hurwitz) zeta function, defined by
and is the Riemann zeta function. Here and throughout, denotes the set of integers less than or equal to some integer ℓ. The polygamma functions satisfy the following functional equation (refer to [4] (Equation (1.13))):
The harmonic numbers of order s, signified as , are defined by
Here, and in subsequent discussions, represents the set of complex numbers. Also, . When , we obtain the classical harmonic numbers in (3). The following relations are recalled: for ,
where is Euler–Mascheroni constant (see, for instance, [3] (Section 1.2)), and
where and (see, for example, [5] (Equation (1.25))).
A generalized binomial coefficient can be defined, in terms of the gamma function, by
It is clear from (13) that, for ,
We now present a series of lemmas, which will be used in the next section to prove the main results.
Lemma 1.
Let . Also, let with . Then, the following identities hold:
Proof.
To prove (18), let represent the left-hand side of (18). Using (14), we have
which, upon employing (16), leads to
Setting in the last limit and using (15), we obtain
Applying (15), we have
Using (24), we obtain
Lemma 2.
Let and . Also let with . Then, the following identities hold:
where
Here and elsewhere, let represent the set of real numbers.
Proof.
Split the sum into two parts as follows:
Taking the limit on the first sum of the right-hand side of (30), with the aid of (11) and , we have
Therefore, it follows from (13) that
Setting and then deleting the prime on k, we obtain
Utilizing (16) to simplify the last sum gives
Taking the limit on both sides of (30) as x tends to n, and using (31) and (32), we obtain the identity (27).
The detailed steps are omitted. □
Lemma 3.
Let with . Then, the following identity holds:
2. Proofs of Main Results
This section provides proofs of our main results, Theorems 1 and 2.
Proof of Theorem 1.
Differentiating both sides of this equality with respect to the variable x gives
where is given as in (28). Let with . Let us separate the nth term from the two sums on the right-hand side of (34), rearrange the extracted terms and the remaining sums, and then take the limit of both sides of the resulting expressions as . Then, we obtain the following identity:
where
and
Proof of Theorem 2.
Let with . Breaking up the sum on the left-hand side of (42) into two summations, extracting the nth terms of the three sums on the right-hand side of the equation separately, and finally taking the limit of both sides of the resultant equality as x tends to n, we obtain
where
Employing the definition of in (28), we have
Similarly, we derive
Using (17) in the limit of the last equality gives
Applying (7) to the second sum in the above , we have
By using (15), we have
By using (21), we have
We find that
Substituting the values of , and obtained in (44), (48), (52), (53), and (54) into (43), respectively, we obtain
Finally, employing Theorem 1, and replacing m by in the resultant identity, we obtain the desired result (8). □
3. Particular Cases and Remarks
This section offers specific instances of the main results along with pertinent remarks.
Setting in Equation (7) yields the identity presented in the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
Let . Then,
Setting in Equation (7) yields the identity presented in the following corollary.
Corollary 2.
Let . Then,
In the particular case when , this gives
Corollary 3.
Let and . Then,
Proof.
Corollary 4.
Let and . Then,
The particular case yields
Proof.
Differentiating both sides of (7) with respect to t, using the following identities:
and putting in the resulting identity, we have
Setting in (7) gives the identity stated in the following corollary.
Corollary 5.
Let . Then,
The special case gives
Remark 1.
Putting in Equation (57) yields the classical identity due to Euler: For ,
By substituting into (8), we obtain the identity presented in the following corollary.
Corollary 6.
Let and . Then,
The particular case gives
By setting into (8), we derive the identity shown in the following corollary.
Corollary 7.
Let . Then,
The particular case when gives
Corollary 8.
Let and . Then,
Proof.
Setting in (8), we obtain
Then, replacing t with in the both sides of the above identity, we obtain the desired identity (60). □
Corollary 9.
Let and . Then,
Proof.
Integrating both sides of Equation (60) over , after dividing both sides by t, the proof follows. We omit the details. □
Corollary 10.
Let . Then,
The particular case when provides
Corollary 11.
Let and . Then,
The special case when gives
Proof.
Differentiating both sides of (8) with respect to t and setting in the resulting identity, we obtain
Replacing m with in the just preceding identity, we obtain the desired identity (61). □
Corollary 12.
Let . Then,
The special case when offers
Proof.
Corollary 13.
Let and . Then,
The particular case when offers
Proof.
Integrating both sides of this equality from to and using the well-known gamma-beta functional equation, we obtain
Using , we obtain
and
Remark 3.
Setting in (60), we obtain
The following identities are similar to those found above:
where .
Identities (71), (72), (73), and (74) can be derived by applying Equations (11) and (12) to the corresponding formulas obtained from MATHEMATICA 13.0. Indeed, a generalized formula that encompasses the identities (68), (71), (72), and (73) as special cases is presented in [11] (Corollary 3.2).
4. Concluding Remarks
We have conducted a thorough analysis of the following finite parameterized binomial sums:
where , , and . Our study includes numerous corollaries that underscore the significance of our findings.
Our results appear to be novel in the existing literature, and we believe that our methodology is at least as important as the results themselves. By applying our method to the third, fourth, and higher derivatives of Equation (2) with respect to the variable x, many additional parameterized finite binomial sums involving harmonic numbers can be derived.
Infinite versions of the sums we explored can be found in [12]. For further parameterized finite binomial sums, we direct readers to [13].
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft, N.B. and J.C.; Writing—review and editing, N.B. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback. Their constructive and encouraging comments have significantly enhanced the quality of this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
- Sun, Z.-W. Super congruences and Euler numbers. Sci. China Math. 2011, 54, 2509–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofo, A.; Batır, N. On finite sums and integral representations. Integers 2013, 13, A45. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava, H.M.; Choi, J. Zeta and q-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Batır, N.; Choi, J. Certain logarithmic integrals and associated Euler sums. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2024, 538, 128365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzer, H.; Choi, J. Four parametric linear Euler sums. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 484, 123661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batır, N.; Choi, J. Four types of variant Euler harmonic sums. Appl. Anal. Discret. Math. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gould, H. Solution to advanced problem H-219. Fibonacci Quart. 1975, 13, 185–187. [Google Scholar]
- Batır, N.; Sofo, A. A unified treatment of certain classes of combinatorial identities. J. Integer. Seq. 2021, 24, 21.3.2. [Google Scholar]
- Batır, N. Finite binomial sum identities with harmonic numbers. J. Integer. Seq. 2021, 24, 21.4.3. [Google Scholar]
- Batır, N. Combinatorial identities involving harmonic numbers. Integers 2020, 20, A25. [Google Scholar]
- Batır, N. On some combinatorial identities and harmonic sums. Int. J. Number Theory 2017, 13, 1695–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batır, N. Parametric binomial sums involving harmonic numbers. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas FíSicas Nat. Ser. A Mat. 2021, 115, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batır, N.; Chen, K.-W. Combinatorial identities involving reciprocals of the binomial and central binomial coefficients and harmonic numbers. J. Differ. Equations Appl. 2022, 28, 222–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).