Linking Transformation and Problem Atomization in Algebraic Problem-Solving
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Basis
3. Methodology
4. Findings
- (A)
- Interview with teachers
- (B)
- First interview with students
- (C)
- Second interview with students
“Am I supposed to remember so many things in one task?”
“I cannot solve the problem without the assignment.”
“I prefer to learn something that surely leads to the result.”
“How do I know I am supposed to atomize a task?”
“Is problem atomization applicable to other types of equations?”
“Is the solution of inequalities also atomized?”
“Is there a tutorial on how to atomize a task?”
“Teachers always told us that math knowledge is related, but only now I really see that it is.”
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
References
- Freudenthal, H. Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Kieran, C. Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educ. Stud. Math. 1981, 12, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filloy, E.; Rojano, T. Solving Equations: The Transition from Arithmetic to Algebra. Learn. Math. 1989, 9, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
- Gallardo, A. The extension of the natural-number domain to the integers in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Educ. Stud. Math. 2002, 49, 171–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bush, S.B.; Karp, K.S. Prerequisite algebra skills and associated misconceptions of middle grade students: A review. J. Math. Behav. 2013, 32, 613–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlassis, J.; Demonty, I. The role of algebraic thinking in dealing with negative numbers. ZDM–Math. Educ. 2022, 54, 1243–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirshner, D.; Awtry, T. Visual salience of algebraic transformations. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2004, 35, 224–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilpatrick, J.; Swafford, J.; Findell, B. Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; Volume 2101. [Google Scholar]
- Verschaffel, L.; Schukajlow, S.; Star, J.; Van Dooren, W. Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM 2020, 52, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarz, N.; Kieran, C.; Lee, L. (Eds.) Approaches to Algebra, Perspectives for Research and Teaching; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1996; ISBN 0-7923-4145-7. [Google Scholar]
- Kieran, C. Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it. Math. Educ. 2004, 8, 139–151. [Google Scholar]
- Ashcraft, M.H.; Guillaume, M.M. Mathematical cognition and the problem size effect. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 2009, 51, 121–151. [Google Scholar]
- Khramova, M.V.; Kuc, A.K.; Maksimenko, V.A.; Frolov, N.S.; Grubov, V.V.; Kurkin, S.A.; Pisarchik, A.N.; Shusharina, N.N.; Fedorov, A.A.; Hramov, A.E. Monitoring the cortical activity of children and adults during cognitive task completion. Sensors 2021, 21, 6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demby, A. Algebraic procedures used by 13-to-15-year-olds. Educ. Stud. Math. 1997, 33, 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christou, K.P.; Kyrvei, D.I.; Vamvakoussi, X. Interpreting literal symbols in algebra under the effects of the natural number bias. Math. Think. Learn. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayalon, M.; Even, R. Students’opportunities to engage in transformational algebraic activity in different beginning algebra topics and classes. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2015, 13, 285–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano, M.D. Using enactivism as a methodology to characterise algebraic learning. ZDM 2015, 47, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duval, R. A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 2006, 61, 103–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matthews, P.G.; Fuchs, L.S. Keys to the gate? Equal sign knowledge at second grade predicts fourth-grade algebra competence. Child Dev. 2020, 91, e14–e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knuth, E.J.; Alibali, M.W.; McNeil, N.M.; Weinberg, A.; Stephens, A.C. Middle school students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence & Variable1. Zent. Didakt. Math. 2005, 37, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- McNeil, N.M.; Chesney, D.L.; Matthews, P.G.; Fyfe, E.R.; Petersen, L.A.; Dunwiddie, A.E.; Wheeler, M.C. It pays to be organized: Organizing arithmetic practice around equivalent values facilitates understanding of math equivalence. J. Educ. Psychol. 2012, 104, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simsek, E.; Xenidou-Dervou, I.; Karadeniz, I.; Jones, I. The Conception of Substitution of the Equals Sign Plays a Unique Role in Students’ Algebra Performance. J. Numer. Cogn. 2019, 5, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, I.; Pratt, D. A substituting meaning for the equals sign in arithmetic notating tasks. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2012, 43, 2–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, R.; Subramaniam, K. Evolution of a teaching approach for beginning algebra. Educ. Stud. Math. 2012, 80, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kieran, C. Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. Second Handb. Res. Math. Teach. Learn. 2007, 2, 707–762. [Google Scholar]
- Hoch, M.; Dreyfus, T. Structure sense versus manipulation skills: An unexpected result. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic, 16–21 July 2006; Volume 3, pp. 305–312. [Google Scholar]
- Hammad, S.; Graham, T.; Dimitriadis, C.; Taylor, A. Effects of a successful mathematics classroom framework on students’ mathematics self-efficacy, motivation, and achievement: A case study with freshmen students at a university foundation programme in Kuwait. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 53, 1502–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanton, M.; Isler-Baykal, I.; Stroud, R.; Stephens, A.; Knuth, E.; Gardiner, A.M. Growth in children’s understanding of generalizing and representing mathematical structure and relationships. Educ. Stud. Math. 2019, 102, 193–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcavi, A. Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. Learn. Math. 1994, 14, 24–35. [Google Scholar]
- Boero, P. Transformation and anticipation as key processes in algebraic problem solving. In Perspectives on School Algebra; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 99–119. [Google Scholar]
- Jupri, A.; Drijvers, P. Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2016, 12, 2481–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonda, D.; Pavlovičová, G.; Ďuriš, V.; Tirpáková, A. Problem Transformation as a Gateway to the Wider Use of Basic Computational Algorithms. Mathematics 2022, 10, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feikes, D.; Schwingendorf, K. The Importance of Compression in Children’s Learning of Mathematics and Teacher’s Learning to Teach Mathematics. Mediterr. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2008, 7, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Phonapichat, P.; Wongwanich, S.; Sujiva, S. An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 116, 3169–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boaler, J. Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential through Creative Math, Inspiring Messages and Innovative Teaching; Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, L.; Bokhove, C. Rethinking the role of algorithms in school mathematics: A conceptual model with focus on cognitive development. ZDM 2014, 46, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agoestanto, A.; Sukestiyarno, Y.L. An analysis on generational, transformational, global meta-level algebraic thinking ability in junior high school students. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1321, 032082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, I.F. What characterizes the algebraic competence of Norwegian upper secondary school students? Evidence from TIMSS advanced. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2015, 13, 71–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, T.; Mejía-Ramos, J.P.; Inglis, M. Do mathematicians and undergraduates agree about explanation quality? Educ. Stud. Math. 2022, 111, 445–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, F.K.S. Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions: A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West; Leung, F.K.S., Graf, K.-D., Lopez-Real, F.J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 21–46. [Google Scholar]
- Shield, M.; Dole, S. Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013, 82, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boesen, J.; Helenius, O.; Bergqvist, E.; Bergqvist, T.; Lithner, J.; Palm, T.; Palmberg, B. Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. J. Math. Behav. 2014, 33, 72–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasteiger, H.; Brunner, E.; Chen, C.S. Basic conditions of early mathematics education—A comparison between Germany, Taiwan and Switzerland. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2021, 19, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lithner, J. Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM 2017, 49, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.Y. Pre-service teachers’ flexibility with referent units in solving a fraction division problem. Educ. Stud. Math. 2017, 96, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escalera Chávez, M.E.; Moreno García, E.; Rojas Kramer, C.A. Confirmatory Model to Measure Attitude towards Mathematics in Higher Education Students: Study Case in SLP Mexico. Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ. 2019, 14, 163–168. [Google Scholar]
- Star, J.R. Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2005, 36, 404–411. [Google Scholar]
- Holenstein, M.; Bruckmaier, G.; Grob, A. Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: An integrative longitudinal study. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2021, 36, 799–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rittle-Johnson, B.; Star, J.R.; Durkin, K. Developing procedural flexibility: Are novices prepared to learn from comparing procedures? Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2012, 82, 436–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Legesse, M.; Luneta, K.; Ejigu, T. Analyzing the effects of mathematical discourse-based instruction on eleventh-grade students’ procedural and conceptual understanding of probability and statistics. Stud. Educ. Eval. 2020, 67, 100918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skemp, R.R. Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Math. Teach. 1976, 77, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
- Hiebert, J. Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study; DIaNe Publishing: Darby, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Lithner, J. A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educ. Stud. Math. 2008, 67, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joklitschke, J.; Rott, B.; Schindler, M. Notions of creativity in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2022, 20, 1161–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benton, L.; Saunders, P.; Kalas, I.; Hoyles, C.; Noss, R. Designing for learning mathematics through programming: A case study of pupils engaging with place value. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 2018, 16, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amar, G.I. The Use of Creative Problem Solving Based Genetic Mutation Module in Higher Education. Int. J. High. Educ. 2021, 10, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Căprioară, D. Problem solving-purpose and means of learning mathematics in school. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 191, 1859–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laudano, F. Proof Without Words: Magic of Tangential Polygons. Coll. Math. J. 2020, 51, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rittle-Johnson, B.; Schneider, M. Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition; Oxford Library of Psychology: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 1118–1134. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lengyelfalusy, T.; Gonda, D. Linking Transformation and Problem Atomization in Algebraic Problem-Solving. Mathematics 2023, 11, 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11092114
Lengyelfalusy T, Gonda D. Linking Transformation and Problem Atomization in Algebraic Problem-Solving. Mathematics. 2023; 11(9):2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11092114
Chicago/Turabian StyleLengyelfalusy, Tomáš, and Dalibor Gonda. 2023. "Linking Transformation and Problem Atomization in Algebraic Problem-Solving" Mathematics 11, no. 9: 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11092114
APA StyleLengyelfalusy, T., & Gonda, D. (2023). Linking Transformation and Problem Atomization in Algebraic Problem-Solving. Mathematics, 11(9), 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11092114