Next Article in Journal
Keller–Osserman Phenomena for Kardar–Parisi–Zhang-Type Inequalities
Previous Article in Journal
SCM Enables Improved Single-Cell Clustering by Scoring Consensus Matrices
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Fourth-Order Difference Scheme and a Matrix Transform Approach for Solving Fractional PDEs

Mathematics 2023, 11(17), 3786; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11173786
by Zahrah I. Salman 1, Majid Tavassoli Kajani 1,*, Mohammed Sahib Mechee 2 and Masoud Allame 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Mathematics 2023, 11(17), 3786; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11173786
Submission received: 10 July 2023 / Revised: 17 August 2023 / Accepted: 21 August 2023 / Published: 3 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Computational and Applied Mathematics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors of the article thank the referee.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper proposes a method for a partial-integro differential equation with weakly singular kernel. The temporal derivative is approximated by Crank-Nicolson technique to achieve 2nd order while the spatial derivative being approximated by well known compact finite difference to achieve 4th order. The convergence and stability are proved mainly via Ralyleigh-Ritz theorem. Numerical performance indeed supports established theoretical results.

1. There are many typos in this paper that need to be corrected, e.g. it looks that (2.1) may not be transferred into (2.2), expressions in (3.7), Lemma 4.1, and so on. I suggest authors check carefully and correct them all and other typos.

2. Some formulae are too wide, like (2.23)-(2.26), (4.5)-(4.8), Example 2, Table 3, and so on. I think it is better to make some changes.

3. The second and third inequalities in (4.8) are not obvious. More details are needed.

4. The authors mentioned that Lagrange polynomials can overcome singularity but there is no analysis and numerical illustrations about this part. More details are needed since it is very important in applications.

Check again.

Author Response

The authors of the article thank the referee.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I think our questions are not well addressed.

1. I still find some inaccurate expressions, like from (2.1) to (2.2), the coefficient is not 1/(1-alpha). I think authors need to check and correct these misleading expressions.

2. I think authors may misunderstand [12]. Langrage interpolation in [12] is not on uniform grids. In general, Lagrange interpolation on uniform grids cannot overcome singularity. Therefore, more discussion is necessary.

 

I think our questions are not well addressed.

1. I still find some inaccurate expressions, like from (2.1) to (2.2), the coefficient is not 1/(1-alpha). I think authors need to check and correct these misleading expressions.

2. I think authors may misunderstand [12]. Langrage interpolation in [12] is not on uniform grids. In general, Lagrange interpolation on uniform grids cannot overcome singularity. Therefore, more discussion is necessary.

 

Author Response

The authors of the article thank the referee.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

I am fine with the authors' reply. 

I am fine with the English language.

Back to TopTop