Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Constraints that Occur during Participation in Leisure Activities by High School Students: A Sample of Turkey
Previous Article in Journal
The Technical Efficiency of High Schools: The Case of a Greek Prefecture
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessConcept Paper
Educ. Sci. 2018, 8(2), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020085

Myths of Priority and Unity in Mathematics Learning

1
Education Development Center, Waltham, MA 02453, USA
2
The Rashi School, Dedham, MA 02026, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 February 2018 / Revised: 21 May 2018 / Accepted: 5 June 2018 / Published: 8 June 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [489 KB, uploaded 8 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

How people see the world, even how they research it, is influenced by beliefs. Some beliefs are conscious and the result of research, or at least amenable to research. Others are largely invisible. They may feel like “common knowledge” (though myth, not knowledge), unrecognized premises that are part of the surrounding culture. As we will explain, people also hold ideas in both a detailed form and in a thumbnail image and may not notice when they are using the low-resolution image in place of the full picture. In either case, unrecognized myths about how young learners develop mathematical ideas naturally or with instruction are insidious in that they persist unconsciously and so sway research and practice without being examined rigorously. People are naturally oblivious to the ramifications of unrecognized premises (myths) until they encounter an anomaly that cannot be explained without reexamining those premises. Like all disciplines, mathematics education is shaped and constrained by its myths. This article is a conceptual piece. It uses informally gathered (but reproducible) classroom examples to elaborate on two myths about mathematics learning that can interfere with teaching and can escape the scrutiny of empirical research. Our goal is to give evidence to expand the questions researchers think to pose and to encourage thoughtful reappraisal of the implications of the myths. The myths we will discuss involve the order in which mathematical ideas are learnable and the “unity” of mathematical topics, with special attention to algebra. With examples, we will show that some ideas develop at a strikingly counterintuitive and early time. Taking advantage of such unexpectedly early developments can let educators devise pedagogies that build on the logic young children already have rather than predicating learning on statistically observed learning patterns or even the apparent structure of mathematics. Acknowledging such early developments might change the questions researchers ask and change how they study children’s mathematical learning, with the possible result of changing how children are taught. View Full-Text
Keywords: mathematics; myths; learning; teaching mathematics; myths; learning; teaching
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Goldenberg, E.P.; Carter, C.J. Myths of Priority and Unity in Mathematics Learning. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 85.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top