Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Pre-Service Special Educator Preparation through Combined Use of Virtual Simulation and Instructional Coaching
Next Article in Special Issue
Engineering Attractiveness in the European Educational Environment: Can Distance Education Approaches Make a Difference?
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning-Based App for Self-Evaluation of Teacher-Specific Instructional Style and Tools
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated STEM: Focus on Informal Education and Community Collaboration through Engineering
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Educ. Sci. 2018, 8(1), 9;

Teachers’ Thoughts on Student Decision Making During Engineering Design Lessons

School of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
Received: 31 October 2017 / Revised: 3 December 2017 / Accepted: 9 January 2018 / Published: 11 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Teaching and Learning in STEM Education)
Full-Text   |   PDF [188 KB, uploaded 11 January 2018]


In this paper, I share the results of a study of teachers’ ideas about student decision-making at entry into a professional development program to integrate engineering into their instruction. The framework for the Engineering Design Process (EDP) was based on a Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) model. The EDP embedded within the CBL model suggests teachers should provide opportunities for students to make decisions throughout the design process. The differentiation consolidation decision-making framework was used to understand the decision-making process. Study data was gathered from 16 teacher participants, interviewed and surveyed at entry into the program. The data were analyzed to understand the kinds of decision-making activities the teachers’ identified as possible for students to make based on eleven engineering design scenarios and the teachers’ current use of, and confidence in applying, lessons that engaged students in decision-making. The results indicated the teachers most frequently identified students that engaged in stage one decisions-making activities, i.e., problem identification and clarification. When the teachers discussed stage two and stage three decision-making activities, they most frequently discussed general problem solving or design process type activities with little differentiation of specific details of how the decision-making was to take place. In addition, in most cases teachers did not mention teaching or supporting student decision-making strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: engineering-design; problem-based learning; teacher decisions; student decision-making engineering-design; problem-based learning; teacher decisions; student decision-making
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Meyer, H. Teachers’ Thoughts on Student Decision Making During Engineering Design Lessons. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 9.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top