ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Aim and Scope of the Paper
1.3. Significance of the Study
1.4. Theoretical Frameworks and Studies
- Theoretical Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education [10]: This framework helps explore how technology like ChatGPT offers specific affordances in educational contexts. It allows for the examination of personalized learning experiences, adaptive assessments, and instant feedback mechanisms, thereby providing insights into how AI-powered conversational agents can enhance learning.
- Critical Pedagogy and AI Ethics Framework [11]: This part of the theoretical foundation examines the ethical considerations surrounding AI in education, focusing on the potential biases in algorithms and the lack of emotional intelligence. Drawing from critical pedagogy, it emphasizes the importance of human connection in education and critically evaluates how AI might hinder or augment this connection.
- Digital Divide, Ethics, Privacy, and Sustainability Evaluative Study [12]: Rooted in the theories of digital inclusion and equity, this study focuses on how ChatGPT can bridge or exacerbate educational disparities. It investigates the potential of ChatGPT to provide access to information and support to learners outside traditional learning environments while highlighting concerns about accessibility and equal opportunities for all students.
- STEM Learning with ChatGPT Case Study [8]: The study might also be informed by constructivist learning theories, recognizing that ChatGPT can facilitate a learner-centered approach where students actively construct knowledge. The emphasis on personalized learning experiences and the potential to transcend classroom boundaries aligns with constructivist ideas about how learning happens.
- Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) Study based on partial least squares (PLS) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) [9]: HCI theories might guide the analysis of how students interact with ChatGPT and the effectiveness of these interactions. It provides insights into user experience and usability, essential factors in determining the success of ChatGPT as an educational tool.
1.5. Limitations of the Study
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Literature Search
- a.
- ((“ChatGPT” OR “conversational AI” OR “adaptive learning” OR “intelligent tutoring systems”) AND (“education” OR “e-learning”) AND (“AI” OR “artificial intelligence” OR “machine learning” OR “ML”) AND (“bias” OR “emotional intelligence” OR “data privacy” OR “accessibility”));
- b.
- ((“AI-powered conversational agents” OR “chatbots in education”) AND (“opportunities” OR “challenges”) AND (“personalized learning” OR “instant feedback”) AND (“ethical implications” OR “practical concerns”));
- c.
- ((“ChatGPT” OR “intelligent conversational agents”) AND (“adaptive assessments” OR “24/7 support”) AND (“inclusivity” OR “traditional learning environments”) AND (“bias in algorithms” OR “lack of human connection”));
- d.
- ((“ChatGPT in education”) AND (“opportunities” OR “challenges”) AND (“case studies” OR “real-world applications”) AND (“ethical considerations” OR “educational innovation”)).
2.2. Selection Criteria
3. Related Work
3.1. Current Large Language Models, Studies, and Frameworks in Education
3.2. ChatGPT and Its Applications
- -
- Adaptive assessment: ChatGPT can be used to generate adaptive assessment items, providing students with tailored questions and tasks that match their individual learning needs and progress.
- -
- Content generation and curation: ChatGPT can help educators create and curate learning materials, such as lesson plans, study guides, and summaries, by generating relevant and accurate content based on the given inputs and context.
- -
- Teacher and student support: ChatGPT can serve as a virtual assistant to both teachers and students, providing timely and personalized support for various tasks, such as answering questions, providing feedback, and facilitating collaboration.
4. ChatGPT Opportunities in Education
- Dark Blue: The highest relative interest, indicating regions with the most significant search activity. In this case, China shows the most considerable relative interest.
- Medium Blue: Moderate relative interest, reflecting regions with noticeable but not the highest search activity. This includes countries like the Philippines, Pakistan, Singapore, and India.
- Light Blue: Lower relative interest, showing regions where there is some search activity, but it is not as prominent as in the darker blue areas. This includes countries like Malaysia, Australia, Canada, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, the United Arab Emirates, and South Africa.
4.1. Personalized Learning
Case Study: Immersive Learning Experience (ILX) in a Cybersecurity Class at Torrens University Australia
4.2. Language Learning
Case Study: Supporting Language Learning in a University ESL Program [56]
4.3. Teacher Support and Collaboration
Case Study: Facilitating Collaborative Learning at Monash University [64]
4.4. Inclusive Education and Special Needs Support
Case Study: Enhancing Accessibility for Students with Disabilities in a College Learning Center
4.5. Assessment and Feedback
4.6. Enhancing Creativity and Critical Thinking
4.7. Expanding Access to Education
5. ChatGPT Challenges in Education
5.1. Ethical Concerns
5.2. Potential Biases
5.3. Data Privacy
5.4. Digital Divide
5.5. Teacher Training and Support
5.6. Impact on Motivation
6. Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Ongoing Evaluation and Research
7. Best Practices and Recommendations for Implementing ChatGPT in Education
7.1. Align AI-Driven Tools with Learning Goals and Pedagogy
7.2. Ensure Data Privacy and Security
7.3. Address Potential Biases and Ethical Concerns
7.4. Foster Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Knowledge-Sharing
7.5. Invest in Teacher Training and Support
7.6. Conduct Ongoing Evaluation and Research
7.7. Develop Open-Source AI-Driven Educational Tools
7.8. Promote Learner Autonomy and Agency
7.9. Research Directions
- Investigating the long-term impacts of AI-driven education on learner outcomes. This includes examining academic achievement, motivation, self-efficacy, and well-being, as well as understanding how these tools influence lifelong learning and career readiness.
- Exploring the role of AI-driven tools in promoting cultural and linguistic diversity. This involves researching how AI can be adapted to support the learning needs of diverse populations, enhance multilingual education, and preserve cultural heritage within educational contexts.
- Examining the ethical implications of AI-driven education. This encompasses issues related to data privacy, security, and the potential perpetuation of biases and stereotypes, as well as developing guidelines and frameworks to ensure ethical AI deployment in education.
- Investigating the development of AI-driven tools that support the professional growth of educators. This includes AI-driven coaching and mentoring systems, tools for personalized professional development, and platforms that facilitate collaborative learning among educators.
- Assessing the impact of AI on equity and inclusivity in education. Researching how AI can help address systemic barriers to learning and ensuring that all learners, regardless of their background, have equitable access to high-quality educational opportunities.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-driven social-emotional learning tools. Understanding how these tools can help learners develop essential skills such as empathy, self-awareness, and emotional regulation and measuring their impact on student engagement and well-being.
8. Conclusions
Future Prospects
- -
- Advanced AI-driven assessment and feedback systems capable of providing real-time, personalized feedback to learners, with improved accuracy and deeper insights, helping them to more effectively identify and address gaps in their knowledge and understanding.
- -
- Next-generation AI-driven tools for supporting social-emotional learning, equipped with more nuanced and adaptive capabilities, which will help learners to develop essential skills such as empathy, self-awareness, and emotional regulation in more personalized and effective ways.
- -
- Enhanced AI-driven tools for promoting equity and inclusivity in education, which will leverage advanced algorithms and data analytics to more effectively address systemic barriers to learning, ensuring that all learners have equitable opportunities to succeed and thrive in their educational pursuits.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Egger, R.; Gokce, E. Natural Language Processing (NLP): An Introduction. In Applied Data Science in Tourism: Interdisciplinary Approaches, Methodologies, Applications; Egger, R., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 307–334. ISBN 978-3-030-88389-8. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Han, T.; Ma, S.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Tian, J.; He, H.; Li, A.; He, M.; Liu, Z.; et al. Summary of ChatGPT-Related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology 2023, 1, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferruz, N.; Höcker, B. Controllable protein design with language models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2022, 4, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshahrani, A. The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2023, 7, 2029–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.; Ahn, D. The Promise and Peril of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Design Implications. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 11–16 May 2024; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Higgs, J.M.; Stornaiuolo, A. Being Human in the Age of Generative AI: Young People’s Ethical Concerns about Writing and Living with Machines. Read. Res. Q. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmes, W.; Porayska-Pomsta, K.; Holstein, K.; Sutherland, E.; Baker, T.; Shum, S.B.; Santos, O.C.; Rodrigo, M.T.; Cukurova, M.; Bittencourt, I.I.; et al. Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2022, 32, 504–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasconcelos, M.A.R.; Santos, R.P. dos Enhancing STEM Learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as Objects to Think With: A Case Study. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Tech. Ed. 2023, 19, em2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foroughi, B.; Senali, M.G.; Iranmanesh, M.; Khanfar, A.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Annamalai, N.; Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B. Determinants of Intention to Use ChatGPT for Educational Purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2023, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Yang, W. Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education. ECNU Rev. Educ. 2023, 6, 20965311231168423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maboloc, C.R. Chat GPT: The need for an ethical framework to regulate its use in education. J. Public Health 2024, 46, e152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khowaja, S.A.; Khuwaja, P.; Dev, K. ChatGPT Needs SPADE (Sustainability, PrivAcy, Digital divide, and Ethics) Evaluation: A Review. Cogn. Comput. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spennemann, D.H.R. ChatGPT and the Generation of Digitally Born “Knowledge”: How Does a Generative AI Language Model Interpret Cultural Heritage Values? Knowledge 2023, 3, 480–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raiaan, M.A.K.; Mukta, M.S.H.; Fatema, K.; Fahad, N.M.; Sakib, S.; Mim, M.M.J.; Ahmad, J.; Ali, M.E.; Azam, S. A Review on Large Language Models: Architectures, Applications, Taxonomies, Open Issues and Challenges. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 26839–26874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alqahtani, T.; Badreldin, H.A.; Alrashed, M.; Alshaya, A.I.; Alghamdi, S.S.; bin Saleh, K.; Alowais, S.A.; Alshaya, O.A.; Rahman, I.; Al Yami, M.S.; et al. The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2023, 19, 1236–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alnuhait, D.; Wu, Q.; Yu, Z. FaceChat: An Emotion-Aware Face-to-face Dialogue Framework. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.07316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mhlanga, D. Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. SSRN Electron. J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maximizing Your Academic Potential with Azure OpenAI Services ChatGPT Virtual Assistant. Available online: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/educator-developer-blog/maximizing-your-academic-potential-with-azure-openai-services/ba-p/3773865 (accessed on 16 July 2024).
- Prakash, K.; Rao, S.; Hamza, R.; Lukich, J.; Chaudhari, V.; Nandi, A. Integrating LLMs into Database Systems Education. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Data Systems Education: Bridging Education Practice with Education Research, Santiago, Chile, 9–15 June 2024; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 33–39. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, D. Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 13943–13967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Li, H.; Sawaengdist, A. The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: Opportunities and challenges in education. Lang. Learn. High. Educ. 2024, 14, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Khan, S.; Khan, I.H. Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. 2023, 3, 100115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bochra, G. EFL Students Perceptions of Chat GPT Usage for Literary Analysis. Master’s Thesis, University Center of Abdalhafid Boussouf, Mila, Algeria, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y. Critical Thinking Pedagogics Design in an Era of ChatGPT and Other AI Tools—Shifting From Teaching “What” to Teaching “Why” and “How”. J. Educ. Dev. 2024, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Lee, D. Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 100, 4876–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H. Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1181712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Minh, A.N. Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing English Writing Skills and Critical Thinking in University Freshmen. J. Knowl. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2024, 3, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Berg, G.; du Plessis, E. ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The 17 GOALS|Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 16 July 2024).
- Raman, R.; Lathabai, H.H.; Mandal, S.; Das, P.; Kaur, T.; Nedungadi, P. ChatGPT: Literate or intelligent about UN sustainable development goals? PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0297521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Utami, P.L.; Suprapto, N.; Hidaayatullaah, H.N.; Cheng, T.-H. The comparison of Chat GPT, Perplexity AI, and Scopus database to capture Indonesian higher education quality in achieving SDGs 2030. E3S Web Conf. 2024, 513, 04001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, T.; Jameel, S.M.; Goggins, J. Education for Sustainable Development: Mapping the SDGs to University Curricula. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opara, E.; Mfon-Ette Theresa, A.; Aduke, T.C. ChatGPT for Teaching, Learning and Research: Prospects and Challenges. Glob. Acad. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 5, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
- Kayumov, O.; Kayumov, O.; Turakulov, O. Methodology of creating interactive electronic educational resources and using them in the educational process. Sci.-Theor. J. Int. Educ. Res. 2023, 1, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
- Bucchiarone, A. Gamification and virtual reality for digital twin learning and training: Architecture and challenges. Virtual Real. Intell. Hardw. 2022, 4, 471–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayala, S. ChatGPT as a Universal Design for Learning Tool: Supporting College Students with Disabilities. Educ. Renaiss. 2023, 12, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasumala, J.; Penoliad, E.J.; Embang, S.; Watanabe, K. Understanding the Lived Experiences of the Generalist Teachers in an Inclusive Classroom. J. High. Educ. Res. Discip. 2024, 9, 32–48. [Google Scholar]
- Mandalia, S. Tourism Education in the Digital Era: Navigating Innovation and Transformation; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 509–530. [Google Scholar]
- Cotton, D.R.E.; Cotton, P.A.; Shipway, J.R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2024, 61, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tlili, A.; Shehata, B.; Adarkwah, M.A.; Bozkurt, A.; Hickey, D.T.; Huang, R.; Agyemang, B. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn. Environ. 2023, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowland, D.R. Two frameworks to guide discussions around levels of acceptable use of generative AI in student academic research and writing. J. Acad. Lang. Learn. 2023, 17, T31–T69. [Google Scholar]
- Kortemeyer, G. Could an artificial-intelligence agent pass an introductory physics course? Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 2023, 19, 010132. Available online: https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010132 (accessed on 16 July 2024). [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Z.; Dai, Y.; Yu, P.S.; Sun, L. A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.04226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y. Roles of ChatGPT in virtual teaching assistant and intelligent tutoring system: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 22–24 September 2023; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 201–206. [Google Scholar]
- Riaz, M. A Personalized Learning System: Education by AI. Available online: http://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/859086 (accessed on 16 July 2024).
- Chan, C.K.Y.; Colloton, T. Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2024; ISBN 978-1-03-260418-3. [Google Scholar]
- Jain, V.; Singh, I.; Syed, M.; Mondal, S.; Ranjan Palai, D. Enhancing Educational Interactions: A Comprehensive Review of AI Chatbots in Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 2024 11th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India, 14–15 March 2024; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, L.; Martinez-Maldonado, R.; Gasevic, D. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics: Contextualising Opportunities and Challenges through the Learning Analytics Cycle. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 18–22 March 2024; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 101–111. [Google Scholar]
- Perkins, M. Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2023, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crompton, H.; Edmett, A.; Ichaporia, N.; Burke, D. AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2024. [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Kshetri, N.; Hughes, L.; Slade, E.L.; Jeyaraj, A.; Kar, A.K.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Koohang, A.; Raghavan, V.; Ahuja, M.; et al. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2023, 71, 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maurya, R.K.; Montesinos, S.; Bogomaz, M.; DeDiego, A.C. Assessing the use of ChatGPT as a psychoeducational tool for mental health practice. Couns. Psychother. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.T.X.; Nguyen, H.V.; Bui, H.P. Technology-Assisted Task-Based Second Language Assessment for Learning. In Innovations and Applications of Technology in Language Education; Auerbach Publications: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; ISBN 978-1-00-347391-6. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, S.; Qin, L.; Chen, T.; Zha, Z.; Qiu, B.; Wang, W. Large Language Model based Situational Dialogues for Second Language Learning. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.20005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haleem, A.; Javaid, M.; Singh, R.P. An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. 2022, 2, 100089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitra, N.; Banerjee, A. A Study on Using AI in Promoting English Language Learning. In Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security; Dutta, P., Chakrabarti, S., Bhattacharya, A., Dutta, S., Shahnaz, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 287–297. [Google Scholar]
- ElSayary, A. An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2024, 40, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karaman, M.R.; Göksu, I. Are Lesson Plans Created by ChatGPT More Effective? An Experimental Study. Int. J. Technol. Educ. 2024, 7, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koraishi, O. Teaching English in the Age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to Optimize EFL Materials and Assessment. Lang. Educ. Technol. 2023, 3, 55–72. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, G.-G.; Zhai, X. Using ChatGPT for Science Learning: A Study on Pre-service Teachers’ Lesson Planning. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2024, 17, 1683–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosaiyebzadeh, F.; Pouriyeh, S.; Parizi, R.; Dehbozorgi, N.; Dorodchi, M.; Macêdo Batista, D. Exploring the Role of ChatGPT in Education: Applications and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, Marietta, GA, USA, 11–14 October 2023; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 84–89. [Google Scholar]
- Okulu, H.Z.; Muslu, N. Designing a course for pre-service science teachers using ChatGPT: What ChatGPT brings to the table. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiryakova, G.; Angelova, N. ChatGPT—A Challenging Tool for the University Professors in Their Teaching Practice. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garivaldis, F.J.; Chung, J.; Braganza, L.; Arulkadacham, L.; Sharma, R.; Reupert, A.; McKenzie, S.; Rose, G.; Gupta, T.; Aziz, Z.; et al. Out of sight, but not out of mind: A case study of the collaborative development of a university-wide orientation resource for online students. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 2022, 70, 531–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eysenbach, G. The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers. JMIR Med. Educ. 2023, 9, e46885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, S.; Abawi, L.-A. Leadership, Inclusion, and Quality Education for All. Australas. J. Spec. Incl. Educ. 2018, 42, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, I.; Islam, M.N. Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT in Academia: A Conceptual Analysis. Preprints 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Budler, L.C.; Gosak, L.; Stiglic, G. Review of artificial intelligence-based question-answering systems in healthcare. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2023, 13, e1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, P.P. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2023, 3, 121–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujimoto, S.; Takemoto, K. Revisiting the political biases of ChatGPT. Front. Artif. Intell. 2023, 6, 1232003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hosseini, M.; Horbach, S.P.J.M. Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 2023, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chavanayarn, S. Navigating Ethical Complexities Through Epistemological Analysis of ChatGPT. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2023, 43, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urchs, S.; Thurner, V.; Aßenmacher, M.; Heumann, C.; Thiemichen, S. How Prevalent is Gender Bias in ChatGPT?—Exploring German and English ChatGPT Responses. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2310.03031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gross, N. What ChatGPT Tells Us about Gender: A Cautionary Tale about Performativity and Gender Biases in AI. Soc. Sci. 2023, 12, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nejadgholi, I.; Fraser, K.C.; Kerkhof, A.; Kiritchenko, S. Challenging Negative Gender Stereotypes: A Study on the Effectiveness of Automated Counter-Stereotypes. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.11845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleisig, E.; Smith, G.; Bossi, M.; Rustagi, I.; Yin, X.; Klein, D. Linguistic Bias in ChatGPT: Language Models Reinforce Dialect Discrimination. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.08818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, D.M.; Palitsky, R.; Arconada Alvarez, S.J.; Pozzo, N.S.; Greenleaf, M.N.; Atkinson, C.A.; Lam, W.A. What’s in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT. J. Med. Internet Res. 2024, 26, e51837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sebastian, G. Privacy and Data Protection in ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots: Strategies for Securing User Information. Int. J. Secur. Priv. Pervasive Comput. 2023, 15, 325475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leboukh, F.; Aduku, E.B.; Ali, O. Balancing ChatGPT and Data Protection in Germany: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Makers. J. Politics Ethics New Technol. AI 2023, 2, e35166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Duan, R.; Ni, J. Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. J. Inf. Intell. 2024, 2, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy|IEEE Journals & Magazine|IEEE Xplore. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10198233 (accessed on 16 July 2024).
- Ullah, I.; Hassan, N.; Gill, S.S.; Suleiman, B.; Ahanger, T.A.; Shah, Z.; Qadir, J.; Kanhere, S.S. Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.12523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santiago-Ruiz, E. Writing with ChatGPT in a Context of Educational Inequality and Digital Divide. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. 2023, 19, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
- Raman, R.; Nair, V.; Dinesh, S.; Acharyulu, R. Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Bard in Digital Governance: Accuracy, Adaptability, and Readability Insights. Digit. Gov. Res. Pract. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daepp, M.I.G.; Counts, S. The Emerging AI Divide in the United States. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.11988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.D. Application and Challenges of the Technology Acceptance Model in Elderly Healthcare: Insights from ChatGPT. Technologies 2024, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, W.; Lee, M.; Lee, J.; Oh, S. AI or Authors?: A Comparative Analysis of BERT and ChatGPT’s Keyword Selection in Digital Divide Studies. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 1004–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, P.; Zhang, P.; Teng, H. The Issues and Optimization Strategies in the Modernization of Vocational Education in the Era of Chat GPT. World J. Educ. Res. 2023, 10, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Adel, A.; Ahsan, A.; Davison, C. ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814
Adel A, Ahsan A, Davison C. ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(8):814. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814
Chicago/Turabian StyleAdel, Amr, Ali Ahsan, and Claire Davison. 2024. "ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives" Education Sciences 14, no. 8: 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814
APA StyleAdel, A., Ahsan, A., & Davison, C. (2024). ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives. Education Sciences, 14(8), 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080814