Review Reports
- Levi Leonido1,2,*,
- Antonino Pereira3 and
- Liliana Mendes4
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Eduardo Sanchez-Escribano Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The content of Table 1 is not necessary to be included. Just the name of the activities it does not allow us to know the progression of their contents. I suggest mentioning the difficulty degrees and how many activities are at each level.
In results, Table 7 should not substitute the content of the text. I suggest writing this content in paragraphs and, if you consider, adding a table or figure just with the phases chronology.
The document is obviously translated from Portuguese to English. It is recommended to do a revision of this translation in order to adapt the content into a more native-academic style.
There are some translation mistakes as can be seen in table 4.
Author Response
Grateful for the pertinent and assertive revisions. We inform you that all suggestions have been operationalised and are included in the document that is now resubmitted. We are grateful for the contribution and help in improving the manuscript.
Reviewer 2 Report
The difficulty in explaining in depth all these data collected from 2002 to 2022 is evident. It is necessary authors to explain concepts such as creativity, social coexistence, etc. such as the commentary on the data can be more complete. I also consider it is important to elaborate about the criteria chosen for the difficulty levels in the 129 activities.
Author Response
Grateful for the pertinent and assertive revisions. We inform you that all suggestions have been operationalised and are included in the document that is now resubmitted. We are grateful for the contribution and help in improving the manuscript.