Next Article in Journal
Less but Better? Teaching Maths in Further Education and Collateral Growth
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Expressive Oral Reading Fluency
Open AccessReview

Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature

1
Department of Elementary and Special Education, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA
2
Department of Special Education, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
3
College of Education, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030060
Received: 20 January 2020 / Revised: 26 February 2020 / Accepted: 26 February 2020 / Published: 5 March 2020
In raising the standards for professional educators, higher educators must be prepared to provide the highest quality feedback on student performance and work products toward improved outcomes. This review of the literature examined the major findings of 70 quantitative, mixed methods, or qualitative studies found in higher education journals across a range of disciplines. Multiple recommendations and results for feedback emerged which fall into the categories described by Susan Brookhart. This review found research for each of Brookhart’s categories, with results indicating differences between the perceptions of adherence to sound feedback practices versus the reality of implementation, the potential for innovative tool use, and a disagreement about the effectiveness of peers for providing effective feedback. Indicators for quality within the research confirmed the importance of commonly accepted standards such as positivity, specificity, timeliness, and encouraging active student participation. Additionally, trends and themes indicated a need for the consistent implementation of the feedback exchange process and flexibility to account for student input/preferences. Greater consistency toward the application of these quality indicators should be undertaken when determining the quality of higher education feedback for preservice teachers prior to undertaking summative licensure assessments. View Full-Text
Keywords: feedback; higher education; literature review; quality feedback; teacher preparation feedback; higher education; literature review; quality feedback; teacher preparation
MDPI and ACS Style

Haughney, K.; Wakeman, S.; Hart, L. Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 60.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop