Next Article in Journal
Evolution and Theoretical Implications of the Utility Concept
Previous Article in Journal
Corruption as a Key Driver of Informality: Cross-Country Evidence on Bribery and Institutional Weakness
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Benchmarking Jordan’s Trade Role: A Comparative Analysis of Logistics Infrastructure, Geopolitical Position, and Regional Integration

Management Sciences Department, Business School, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Economies 2025, 13(10), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100282
Submission received: 10 August 2025 / Revised: 14 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 28 September 2025

Abstract

This benchmarking study situates Jordan’s trade indicators relative to comparators (Egypt, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) with descriptive analysis. Using indicators for port competitiveness, geopolitical stability, logistics infrastructure, and trade facilitation within a Modified Input–Process–Output framework, based on secondary data from conventional international indicators (“Fund for Peace Fragile States Index,” “Institute for Economics & Peace Global Peace Index,” “OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators,” “UN Comtrade Trade Volume Records, 2022–2023,” “UN Conference on Trade and Development Port Performance Scorecard,” and “World Bank Logistics Performance Index”). The outcomes of this analysis demonstrate that Jordan’s strengths in terms of institutional quality and geopolitical stability are countermanded by relatively poor digital technology adoption and governance of ports, and homogeneity in exports. Using M-IPO model and SWOT analysis, it was identified that specific actions are needed to improve Jordan’s trade performance, especially as a hub for regional logistics, including investment and facilitation of digital system adoption, commensurate infrastructure, and flexibility in governance.
Keywords: geopolitical stability; Input–Process–Output framework; Jordan; logistics infrastructure; port governance; regional integration; trade benchmarking; trade facilitation geopolitical stability; Input–Process–Output framework; Jordan; logistics infrastructure; port governance; regional integration; trade benchmarking; trade facilitation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samawi, G.A.; Bwaliez, O.M.; Mdanat, M.F. Benchmarking Jordan’s Trade Role: A Comparative Analysis of Logistics Infrastructure, Geopolitical Position, and Regional Integration. Economies 2025, 13, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100282

AMA Style

Samawi GA, Bwaliez OM, Mdanat MF. Benchmarking Jordan’s Trade Role: A Comparative Analysis of Logistics Infrastructure, Geopolitical Position, and Regional Integration. Economies. 2025; 13(10):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samawi, Ghazi A., Omar M. Bwaliez, and Metri F. Mdanat. 2025. "Benchmarking Jordan’s Trade Role: A Comparative Analysis of Logistics Infrastructure, Geopolitical Position, and Regional Integration" Economies 13, no. 10: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100282

APA Style

Samawi, G. A., Bwaliez, O. M., & Mdanat, M. F. (2025). Benchmarking Jordan’s Trade Role: A Comparative Analysis of Logistics Infrastructure, Geopolitical Position, and Regional Integration. Economies, 13(10), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop