Next Article in Journal
Remote Care Technology: A Systematic Review of Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
Utilization of Blended Waste Materials in Bricks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surface Modification of Polystyrene with O Atoms Produced Downstream from an Ar/O2 Microwave Plasma

1
Plasma Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
2
Xerox Analytical Services, Xerox Corporation, Webster, NY 14580, USA
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2018, 6(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010021
Submission received: 12 December 2017 / Revised: 18 January 2018 / Accepted: 6 February 2018 / Published: 9 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microwave Plasma Processing of Materials)

Abstract

:
Because discarded polystyrene (PS) is little affected by degrading agents, PS was treated with a remote microwave (MW) plasma discharge of an Ar/O2 mixture in the absence of radiation to increase wettability and introduce functional groups which make the waste more liable to degradation and useful for technological applications. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) detected decreases in the aromatic sp2 and aliphatic sp3 carbons with treatment and, initially, increases in C–O and carbonyl groups, present in the formation of ethers, epoxides, alcohols, ketones and aldehydes. At longer treatment times, ester, O–C=O; carbonate-like, O–(C=O)–O; and anhydride, O=C–O–C=O; moieties are observed with an overall oxygen saturation level of 23.6 ± 0.9 at% O. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) measurements detected little change in surface roughness with treatment time. Advancing water contact angle decreased by ca. 50% compared to pristine PS indicating an increase in hydrophilicity because of oxidation. Washing the treated samples in deionized water decreased the oxygen concentrations at the saturation treatment times down to 18.6 ± 1 at% O due to the washing away of a weak boundary layer.

1. Introduction

Since polystyrene (PS, Figure 1) has limited water adsorption, and physical and chemical properties that make it relatively non-biodegradable [1], pretreatment of its surface is often done to increase wettability and introduce reactive functional groups to enhance degradation and usefulness for technological applications [2,3].
One way to increase the hydrophilicity of the PS surface is to use vacuum UV (VUV) photo-oxidation where a remote microwave (MW) plasma is employed to produce excited atoms, such as Ar (which emits 104.8 and 106.7 nm VUV radiation), which is then photo-absorbed by gaseous oxygen flowing over the PS surface [4]. The oxidation of the surface may occur because oxygen molecules photo-absorb in the VUV region of the electromagnetic spectrum [5], resulting in photo-dissociation forming reactive ground state, 3P, and electronically excited, 1D and 1S, oxygen atoms which are energetically possible with threshold wavelengths of 242.4, 175.0 and 133.2 nm, respectively [6]. When this VUV photo-oxidation experimental set-up [4] was used to treat poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) [7], the results were in good agreement with a previous study where the oxygen was separated from the radiation emitted from MW plasmas of He-H2 and H2 by a MgF window having a cut-off wavelength of 112 nm [8]. The reaction time associated with the distance from the remote MW plasma results in negligible contributions from charged particles and metastables because of recombination and deactivation processes occurring in transit to the sample [9,10].
Since VUV radiation is capable of σ→σ* alkyl chain excitation to produce free radical centers in the near-surface region of the polymer [4], which may initiate the incorporation of polar oxygen-containing functional groups, this study was done using a remote MW discharge of an Ar/O2 mixture where the samples were not exposed to radiation from the plasma. The operating techniques were similar to that used in a standard procedure for producing ground state O(3P) atoms as, for example, in the EPR chemical kinetic study of O + HBr [11].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Contact Angle Goniometry, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

The materials, and surface characterization using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), water contact angle (CA), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) measurements to determine surface composition of the top 2–5 nm, increases in hydrophilicity, and changes in surface roughness, respectively, were conducted as a function of treatment time, as described in ref. [4]. Commercially available 0.125 mm thick biaxially oriented PS film (Goodfellow Corp., Huntington, UK), (C8H8)n, was cleaned with KOPTEC 200 proof (100%) anhydrous ethanol (Decon Labs Inc., King of Prussia, PA) in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min and stored in a desiccator, that contained calcium sulfate, for at least 24 h.

2.2. Production of Oxygen Atoms

A mild MW plasma system [7] was used to study the surface modification of PS as a function of treatment time. The MW plasma of an Ar/O2 mixture, having flow rates of 50 and 10 sccm, respectively, was generated in an Evenson cavity (Opthos Instruments, Inc., Rockville, MD) which was powered by a 2.45 GHz MW generator (Kiva Instrument Corp, Kensington, MD). The experiments were conducted with MW absorbed power of ca. 25 W and pressure of (2.1–2.9) × 10 Pa. The vacuum system was designed so that the discharge was located ca. 41 cm upstream from the PS and the radiation from the discharge was not directed at the sample [12].

3. Results

3.1. Treatment with a O Atoms Downstream from an Ar/O2 MW Plasma

3.1.1. PS Quantitative Analyses and Contact Angle Measurements

Carbon, oxygen and sometimes a trace amount of nitrogen were detected on the surface of every PS sample. When pure Ar MW plasma was used, XPS detected no change in the surface composition of PS. The quantitative analyses for the PS samples treated in the absence of radiation are summarized as a function of treatment time in Figure 2. Initially, the concentration of oxygen increased rapidly and then saturated at an atomic percentage of 23.6 ± 0.9 at % O for six sets of samples which resulted in a decrease of the advancing water contact angle (CA) (increase in hydrophilicity) of ca. 50%.

3.1.2. XPS Chemical State Analyses

Figure 3 shows an example of the high resolution C 1s spectra obtained for the control and treated samples which were normalized to peak intensity at the main hydrocarbon peak (284.6 eV). Using the binding energies from the literature [7,13], the curve fitting results for the C 1s spectra are reported in Table 1.
The binding energies for phenolic hydroxyl and carboxylic acid are at 286 and 288.6 eV, respectively [14]. As shown in the molecular structure of PS (Figure 1), the C 1s peak for the control sample consists of three distinct components: the aromatic sp2 carbon peak at 284.6 eV, the aliphatic sp3 carbon peak at 285.1 eV, and the energy loss structure associated with the π→π* transition, which is characteristic of the pendant phenyl group, at about 292 eV. Curving fitting six sets of data for pristine PS gave the following results: sp2 (76.7 ± 1.8%), sp3 (19.0 ± 1.5%) and energy loss (4.3 ± 0.4%) which is good agreement with the published analysis for PS: 71.4%, 21.8% and 6.8% [15], respectively, considering the close proximity of the aromatic and aliphatic peaks.
With increasing treatment time, there are decreases in the aromatic sp2 and aliphatic sp3 carbons and, initially, increases in C–O and carbonyl groups due to possible formation of ethers, epoxides, alcohols, ketones and aldehydes. At longer treatment times, ester, O–C=O; carbonate-like, O–(C=O)–O; and anhydride, O=C–O–C=O; moieties are formed. The π→π* energy loss satellite becomes weaker with treatment time as new carbon-oxygen bonds are created.
The overlapped O 1s spectra for the samples (not shown here) were broad Gaussian peaks and, due to the lack of energy resolution, the O 1s spectra did not provide much additional information.
Two experiments were done by treating PS with O atoms for 60 min and then placing the samples in deionized water for 1h while bubbling with gaseous Ar. These washed samples showed a decrease in the surface oxygen saturation level of 5 ± 1 at % O down to 18.6 ± 1 at % O. Analysis of the XPS spectra after washing (Table 2) showed washing had its biggest effect by decreasing the presence of carbonate/anhydride; C–O; and C=O functional groups.

3.1.3 Surface Topography for O Atom Treatment

Figure 4 shows the AFM images and root mean squared (RMS) roughness factor (Rq) for PS samples before (0 min) and after 5, 15 and 60 min of treatment. The changes in surface roughness were found to be insignificant.

4. Discussion

The treatment of PS with O atoms in the absence of radiation showed a controlled increase in the concentration of oxygen with treatment time up to a saturation level of 23.6 ± 0.9 at % O compared to ca. 20 at % observed by VUV photo-oxidation [4]. A remote oxygen 300 W MW plasma study observed that the level of oxidation was dependent on the flow rate and reached an O/C saturation of 0.65, which corresponds to 39 at % O, at 600 sccm [16] compared to the 60 sccm and 25 W used in this study.
The carbonyl, ether, and alcohol functional groups observed in Table 1 may be formed by mechanisms initiated by the abstraction of H atoms from the polymer (RH) by O atoms to produce to free radical sites (R•) as detected by EPR spectroscopy [17]. Reaction of the free radicals with O2 form alkoxyl radicals (RO•) which undergo dissociation by Reaction (1); combine with radicals via Reaction (2); or abstract a hydrogen atom, Reaction (3) [16,18].
RO• → R′C=O + R″•
RO• + R• → ROR
RO• + RH → ROH + R•
Rearrangement of peroxy free radicals (RO2•), formed from the reaction of R• with O2, result in stable functional moieties, such as, ketones, aldehydes and vinyl groups [16]. Subsequent reactions of the aldehydes may lead to the formation of acids, esters or carbonates [16]. Aldehydes would appear at a binding energy of ca. 287 eV [13] and may be present in this study. The carbonate/anhydride moieties are often the highest oxidized form of bound carbon before CO2 is released as observed in the molecular beam-surface scattering experiments involving atomic oxygen and PS [19]. The release of CO2 and cleavage of the polymer chain are often indicators of the formation of a weak boundary layer which was detected by washing the O atom treated PS samples, resulting in an oxygen concentration decrease of 5 ± 1 at % O compared to a 4.9 at % O decrease with VUV photo-oxidation [4]. Weight loss measurements due to the release of CO2 during the reaction of O atoms with PS have been previously reported [20,21,22,23,24].
The addition of O atoms across the unsaturated phenyl groups form phenols [18], and react with unsaturated sp2 C bonds to produce a triplet biradical that undergo ring closure to form epoxide, rearrange to make carbonyl compounds, or decompose into free radicals producing the ether linkage [25] as reported in Table 1. Reaction with the phenyl groups result in the observed decrease of the energy loss π→π* transition with treatment time (Figure 3, Table 1).
The lack of surface roughness changes indicate that the incorporation of the polar oxygenated functional groups on the surface of PS were responsible for the ca. 50% decrease in water contact angle (Figure 2), compared to a ca. 25% decrease using VUV photo-oxidation [4], and hence an increase in hydrophilicity. Higher levels of oxidation were achieved with the downstream MW plasma discharge of the Ar/O2 mixture treatment (23.6 ± 0.9 at % O) than with VUV photo-oxidation (ca. 20 at % O) [4]. Also, less carbonate-like, O–(C=O)–O; and anhydride, O=C–O–C=O, moieties were observed in Table 1 (3.3%) than using VUV photo-oxidation (4.3%), although the amount of weak boundary layer washed away were within experimental error.

5. Conclusions

The downstream MW discharge of an Ar/O2 mixture was a good controlled method for studying the reaction of oxygen atoms with the surface of PS in the absence of radiation to produce saturation levels of 23.6 ± 0.9 at % O. XPS analysis showed the initial formation of C–O and carbonyl groups and with increasing treatment time, ester, carbonate-like, and anhydride groups are formed. Advancing water contact angle and AFM measurements showed that the increase in hydrophilicity is mainly due to surface oxidation and not changes in topography. A weak boundary layer was formed during treatment which, when washed with water, decreased the O saturation level down to 18.6 ± 1 at % O.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Tom Allston and Jeff Mills for help with the instrumentation and preparing the figures.

Author Contributions

Xinyun Li, Fei Lu, Matthew Cocca, Katerine Vega, Andrew Fleischer, Marc Toro, and Shreen Sachdev performed the experiments; Alla Bailey contributed her polymer science expertise; Thomas Debies and Michael Mehan performed and analyzed the XPS data; Surendra K. Gupta performed and analyzed the AFM data; and Gerald A. Takacs supervised the students, designed the experiments, and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, A.; Basak, G.C. Studies of photocatalytic degradation of polystyrene. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2007, 23, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, B.; Sharma, N. Optimized synthesis and characterization of polystyrene graft copolymers and preliminary assessment of their biodegradability and application in water pollution alleviation technologies. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007, 92, 876–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramsey, W.S.; Hertl, W.; Nowlan, E.D.; Binkowski, N.J. Surface treatments and cell attachment. In Vitro 1984, 20, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, X.; Toro, M.; Lu, F.; On, J.; Bailey, A.; Debies, T.; Mehan, M.; Gupta, S.K.; Takacs, G.A. Vacuum UV photo-oxidation of polystyrene. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 2212–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calvert, J.G.; Pitts, J.N. Photochemistry; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1966; pp. 205–209. [Google Scholar]
  6. Okabe, H. Photochemistry of Small Molecules; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1978; p. 179. [Google Scholar]
  7. Morgan, A.; Cocca, M.; Vega, K.; Fleischer, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Mehan, M.; Takacs, G.A. Vacuum UV photo-oxidation of poly(ethylene terephthalate). J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 2542–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hollander, A.; Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E.; Wertheimer, M.R. The influence of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation on poly(ethylene terephthalate). J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1996, 34, 1511–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Badey, J.P.; Urbaczewski-Espunche, E.; Jugnet, Y.; Sage, D.; Minh Duc, T.; Chabert, B. Surface modification of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) by microwave plasma downstream treatment. Polymer 1994, 35, 2472–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lens, J.P.; Spaay, B.; Terlingen, J.G.A.; Engbers, G.H.M.; Feijen, J. Mechanism of the immobilization of surfactants on polymer surfaces by means of an argon plasma treatment: Influence of polymer of UV radiation. Plasmas Polym. 1999, 4, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takacs, G.A.; Glass, G.P. Reaction of atomic oxygen with hydrogen bromide. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oliveira, L.; Debies, T.; Takacs, G.A. Reaction of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with gaseous oxygen and chlorine atoms. In Recent Advances in Adhesion Science and Technology in Honor of Dr. Kash Mittal; Gutowski, W.V., Dodiuk, H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 319–329. [Google Scholar]
  13. Beamson, G.; Briggs, D. High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers: The Scienta ESCA300 Database; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong, X.; Ma, L.Q.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Gu, B. Mechanistic investigation of mercury sorption by Brazilian pepper biochars of different pyrolytic temperatures based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and flow calorimetry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 12156–12164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Girardeaux, C.; Pireaux, J.-J. Analysis of polystyrene (PS) by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 1996, 4, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lianos, L.; Parrat, D.; Hoc, T.Q.; Duc, T.M. Secondary ion mass spectrometry time of flight and in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of polymer surface modifications by remote oxygen plasma treatment. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1994, 12, 2491–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Greyson, J.; Ingalls, R.B.; Keen, R.T. ESR studies of the interaction of nitrogen and oxygen atoms with polystyrene. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 45, 3755–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moss, S.J.; Jolly, A.M.; Tight, B.J. Plasma oxidation of polymers. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 1986, 6, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Minton, T.K.; Zhang, J.; Garton, D.J.; Seale, J.W. Collision-assisted erosion of hydrocarbon polymers in atomic-oxygen environments. High Perform. Polym. 2000, 12, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Banks, B.A.; Backus, J.A.; Manno, M.V.; Waters, D.L.; Cameron, K.C.; de Groh, K.K. Atomic Oxygen Erosion Yield Prediction for Spacecraft Polymers in Low Earth Orbit; NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI): Hanover, MD, USA, 2009; pp. 1–15.
  21. De Groh, K.K.; Banks, B.A.; McCarthy, C.E.; Rucker, R.N.; Roberts, L.M.; Berger, L.A. MISSE 2 PEACE Polymers Atomic Oxygen Erosion Experiment on the International Space Station. High Perform. Polym. 2008, 20, 388–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stambler, A.H.; Inoshita, K.E.; Roberts, L.M.; Barbagallo, C.E.; de Groh, K.K.; Banks, B.A. Ground-laboratory and in-space atomic oxygen correlation for the PEACE polymers. AIP Proc. Prot. Mater. Struct. Space Environ. 2009, 1087, 51–66. [Google Scholar]
  23. Golub, M.A.; Wydeven, T. Reaction of atomic oxygen (O(3P)) with various polymer films. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1988, 22, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hansen, R.H.; Pascale, J.V.; de Benedictis, T.; Rentzepis, P.M. Effect of atomic oxygen on polymers. J. Polym. Sci. 1965, 3, 2205–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.; Pitts, J.N. Atmospheric Chemistry; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 459–469. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of polystyrene. Reproduced with permission from Taylor & Francis Ltd. www.tandfonline.com [4].
Figure 1. Molecular structure of polystyrene. Reproduced with permission from Taylor & Francis Ltd. www.tandfonline.com [4].
Technologies 06 00021 g001
Figure 2. Quantitative X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (at%) and contact angle (CA) results for polystyrene (PS) as a function of treatment time with O atoms downstream from an Ar/O2 microwave (MW) plasma.
Figure 2. Quantitative X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (at%) and contact angle (CA) results for polystyrene (PS) as a function of treatment time with O atoms downstream from an Ar/O2 microwave (MW) plasma.
Technologies 06 00021 g002
Figure 3. Overlapped C 1s spectra for control and treated polystyrene films for 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min using a remote MW discharge of Ar/O2 mixture. The arrow indicates increasing treatment time.
Figure 3. Overlapped C 1s spectra for control and treated polystyrene films for 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min using a remote MW discharge of Ar/O2 mixture. The arrow indicates increasing treatment time.
Technologies 06 00021 g003
Figure 4. AFM surface topographic images after treatment of PS for (a) 0; (b) 5; (c) 15 and (d) 60 min with O atoms.
Figure 4. AFM surface topographic images after treatment of PS for (a) 0; (b) 5; (c) 15 and (d) 60 min with O atoms.
Technologies 06 00021 g004
Table 1. Curve Fitting for C 1s Area Peaks of Polystyrene as a Function of Treatment Time with a Remote MW Discharge of Ar/O2. Binding Energies and species were reproduced with permission from Taylor & Francis Ltd. www.tandfonline.com [4].
Table 1. Curve Fitting for C 1s Area Peaks of Polystyrene as a Function of Treatment Time with a Remote MW Discharge of Ar/O2. Binding Energies and species were reproduced with permission from Taylor & Francis Ltd. www.tandfonline.com [4].
Binding Energy (eV)SpeciesControl2 min5 min10 min15 min30 min45 min60 min120 min
284.6C–C sp278.072.364.560.453.556.053.146.151.7
285.1C–C sp317.713.810.68.111.37.17.310.36.6
286.0 Technologies 06 00021 i00108.511.114.116.017.018.220.119.3
287.0C=O, aldehyde01.98.111.011.812.313.414.113.7
288.6O–C=O, carboxylic acid001.72.52.73.43.74.64.5
289.8O=C–O–C=O, O–(C=O)–O001.11.92.42.62.73.33.3
292.0Energy Loss4.33.43.02.12.31.81.61.61.0
Table 2. Curve Fitting of C 1s Area Peaks for Untreated PS (Control), 60 min O atom Treated PS, and two 60 min O atom Treated PS Samples after Washed with Deionized Water. Binding energies and species were reproduced with permission from Taylor & Francis Ltd. www.tandfonline.com [4].
Table 2. Curve Fitting of C 1s Area Peaks for Untreated PS (Control), 60 min O atom Treated PS, and two 60 min O atom Treated PS Samples after Washed with Deionized Water. Binding energies and species were reproduced with permission from Taylor & Francis Ltd. www.tandfonline.com [4].
Binding Energy (eV)SpeciesControl60 min60 min Washed60 min Washed
284.6C–C sp278.046.167.761.3
285.1C–C sp317.710.312.516.2
286.0 Technologies 06 00021 i002020.18.47.2
287.0C=O, aldehyde014.16.27.1
288.6O–C=O, carboxylic acid04.63.15.0
289.8O=C–O–C=O, O–(C=O)–O03.30.81.4
292.0Energy Loss4.31.61.31.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Lu, F.; Cocca, M.; Vega, K.; Fleischer, A.; Bailey, A.; Toro, M.; Sachdev, S.; Debies, T.; Mehan, M.; et al. Surface Modification of Polystyrene with O Atoms Produced Downstream from an Ar/O2 Microwave Plasma. Technologies 2018, 6, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010021

AMA Style

Li X, Lu F, Cocca M, Vega K, Fleischer A, Bailey A, Toro M, Sachdev S, Debies T, Mehan M, et al. Surface Modification of Polystyrene with O Atoms Produced Downstream from an Ar/O2 Microwave Plasma. Technologies. 2018; 6(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xinyun, Fei Lu, Matthew Cocca, Katerine Vega, Andrew Fleischer, Alla Bailey, Marc Toro, Shreen Sachdev, Thomas Debies, Michael Mehan, and et al. 2018. "Surface Modification of Polystyrene with O Atoms Produced Downstream from an Ar/O2 Microwave Plasma" Technologies 6, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010021

APA Style

Li, X., Lu, F., Cocca, M., Vega, K., Fleischer, A., Bailey, A., Toro, M., Sachdev, S., Debies, T., Mehan, M., Gupta, S. K., & Takacs, G. A. (2018). Surface Modification of Polystyrene with O Atoms Produced Downstream from an Ar/O2 Microwave Plasma. Technologies, 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop