This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Evaluation of the Validity and Lateral Differences of Ring-Type Wearable Sensors for Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Monitoring Under Multiple Conditions
by
Emi Yuda
Emi Yuda 1,2,*
and
Junichiro Hayano
Junichiro Hayano 3
1
Innovation Center for Semiconductor and Digital Future, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
2
Department of Management Science and Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
3
School of Medicine, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 467-0001, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2026, 14(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14010020 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 November 2025
/
Revised: 24 December 2025
/
Accepted: 24 December 2025
/
Published: 26 December 2025
Abstract
Ring-type wearable sensors are increasingly used for continuous monitoring of heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV); however, evidence regarding their measurement validity and potential lateral differences remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the validity of HR and HRV obtained from ring-type photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors under multiple activity conditions (Experiment 1), and (2) the presence of lateral differences in autonomic indices when worn on the left versus right hand (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, HR and HRV indices from the ring sensor were compared with those from a Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) and a wrist device during rest, low activity, and moderate activity. Mixed-model analysis revealed significant differences in very low frequency (VLF) power between the left- and right-hand rings (p = 0.001). Additionally, significant interactions between device side and measurement condition were observed for HR and low-frequency (LF) components, indicating that lateral differences were condition-dependent. In Experiment 2, participants wore two ring sensors simultaneously to assess left–right discrepancies under rest and exercise conditions. The SDPP index showed a significant difference (p = 0.017), with mean values differing between Rest and Exercise, demonstrating condition-related variability but limited systematic lateral bias. Overall, ring-type wearable sensors demonstrated high validity for HR and acceptable performance for selected HRV metrics during rest and low-activity states. While some condition-dependent lateral differences emerged for specific HRV parameters, the practical impact on overall measurement performance remained modest. These findings support the utility of ring-type wearable devices for autonomic monitoring while highlighting the importance of considering activity level and side–condition interactions.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Yuda, E.; Hayano, J.
Evaluation of the Validity and Lateral Differences of Ring-Type Wearable Sensors for Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Monitoring Under Multiple Conditions. Technologies 2026, 14, 20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14010020
AMA Style
Yuda E, Hayano J.
Evaluation of the Validity and Lateral Differences of Ring-Type Wearable Sensors for Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Monitoring Under Multiple Conditions. Technologies. 2026; 14(1):20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14010020
Chicago/Turabian Style
Yuda, Emi, and Junichiro Hayano.
2026. "Evaluation of the Validity and Lateral Differences of Ring-Type Wearable Sensors for Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Monitoring Under Multiple Conditions" Technologies 14, no. 1: 20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14010020
APA Style
Yuda, E., & Hayano, J.
(2026). Evaluation of the Validity and Lateral Differences of Ring-Type Wearable Sensors for Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Monitoring Under Multiple Conditions. Technologies, 14(1), 20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14010020
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.