Next Article in Journal
Corporate Governance Rating and Ownership Structure in the Case of Turkey
Previous Article in Journal
Public Debt, Public Investment and Economic Growth in Mexico
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2016, 4(2), 7;

Debunking Two Myths of the Weekend Effect

Department of Accounting & Information Systems, Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University, 1 Washington Park #944, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
Academic Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Received: 7 December 2015 / Revised: 6 February 2016 / Accepted: 18 March 2016 / Published: 7 April 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [325 KB, uploaded 7 April 2016]   |  


This paper finds the weekend effect to be a remarkably robust anomaly and refutes the widespread belief that the weekend effect is due to data-mining or a consequence of some unusual/rare events. Out-of-sample analysis finds both the mean and median return on Monday is lower than that on Friday in nearly all years. It also reconciles and explains how some prior studies reached such an erroneous conclusion. View Full-Text
Keywords: Weekend effect; Monday effect; anomaly; data-mining Weekend effect; Monday effect; anomaly; data-mining

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheong, F.S. Debunking Two Myths of the Weekend Effect. Int. J. Financial Stud. 2016, 4, 7.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Financial Stud. EISSN 2227-7072 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top