Next Article in Journal
Competence in Sports Pharmacy among Pharmacy Students in Norway
Previous Article in Journal
Cancer-Chemotherapy-Related Regimen Checks Performed by Pharmacists of General Hospitals Other than Cancer Treatment Collaborative Base Hospitals: A Multicenter, Prospective Survey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmacy
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/pharmacy12010002
pharmacy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knowledge and Attitudes of Cannabidiol in Croatia among Students, Physicians, and Pharmacists

by
Ana Batinic
1,*,
Ana Curkovic
2,
Josipa Bukic
3,
Irena Žuntar
4,
Sendi Kuret
2,
Bianka Mimica
5,
Nina Kalajzic
2,
Goran Dujic
6,
Ljubica Glavaš-Obrovac
7,
Ana Soldo
8,
Andrijana Včeva
9,10,
Zeljko Dujic
11 and
Davorka Sutlovic
2,12
1
Pharmacy of Split-Dalmatia County, 21000 Split, Croatia
2
Department of Health Studies, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
3
Department of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
4
Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
School of Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
6
Clinical Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
7
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
8
Croatian Chamber for Pharmacists, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
9
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Osijek, J. Huttlera 4, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
10
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Clinical Hospital Centre Osijek, J. Huttlera 4, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
11
Department of Integrative Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
12
Department of Toxicology and Pharmacogenetics, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmacy 2024, 12(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12010002
Submission received: 13 November 2023 / Revised: 12 December 2023 / Accepted: 21 December 2023 / Published: 23 December 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to cannabidiol’s health benefits and absence of serious side effects, its use is constantly growing. This is a survey-based cross-sectional study that was conducted to determine Croatian pharmacists’, physicians’, and students’ knowledge and attitudes about cannabidiol (CBD). Two questionnaires were created, one for students and the other for physicians and pharmacists. Our participants (in total 874: 473 students and 401 physicians and pharmacists) generally had positive attitudes towards CBD therapy as approximately 60% of them believe that CBD treatment is generally efficacious. Participants had positive attitudes toward the therapeutic value of CBD, especially pharmacists and pharmacy students (63.8% and 72.2%, respectively). Pharmacists were significantly more convinced that CBD could reduce the use of opioids prescribed for chronic pain (p < 0.05). Only 17.5% of students had read scientific papers about CBD, compared to a significantly higher percentage of physicians and pharmacists (43.0% and 47.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). This study revealed a gap in knowledge regarding CBD, since 89.3% of pharmacists and physicians, as well as 84.8% of students, believe they need more education about CBD. We conclude that it is important to improve the educational curricula so that medical professionals can recommend CBD use to their patients when needed.

1. Introduction

The hemp plant (lat. Cannabis sativa L.) is a widely used plant, and its subspecies Indian hemp (lat. Cannabis sativa L. subsp. indica), i.e., marijuana, is considered one of the most commonly consumed recreational drugs worldwide, especially among young adults [1,2]. There are more than 750 identified cannabis chemicals, including more than 100 cannabinoids. Cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-tetrahydrocannabidiol (THC) are the two most important and widely studied components [3,4]. Cannabis is associated with recreational drugs due to THC, which is known as the primary psychoactive component of the plant [5]. However, CBD has no psychotropic effects and has a confirmed safety profile [6,7]. Due to its numerous health benefits and lack of significant negative side effects, CBD use and product marketing are constantly increasing [8,9]. National regulations for the use of CBD vary around the world. The use of CBD as a dietary supplement is allowed in many countries as long as the THC content is below 0.3% in the United States and 0.2% in Europe [10].
Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved only one purified, prescription CBD medicine (Epidiolex®, 100 mg/mL, oral solution). This drug has been designated as an “orphan drug” (a medication used to treat rare disorders). Epidiolex is indicated as adjunctive therapy for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) or Dravet syndrome (DS) in combination with clobazam in patients ≥ 2 years old and as adjunctive therapy for seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) also in patients ≥ 2 years old [11,12,13]. Marinol® (dronabinol), Syndros® (dronabinol), and Cesamet® (nabilone) are three synthetic cannabis-related pharmacological products, also approved by the FDA. Dronabinol is a synthetic delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is considered the psychoactive intoxicating component of cannabis (i.e., the component responsible for the “high” people can experience when using cannabis). The use of dronabinol is indicated for nausea and vomiting associated with malignancies and for the treatment of anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [11,14]. Nabilone (a synthetic with a THC-like chemical structure) is indicated for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy in patients who have not responded adequately to conventional antiemetic treatments. These medications are available in the United States only with a prescription from a licensed healthcare provider [11]. The European Medicines Agency (EMA), has approved the use of Epidyolex® (cannabidiol) for the same indications accepted by the FDA [15]. CBD is marketed as Epidyolex in the European Union, but it is officially known as Epidiolex in the USA. In addition, the EMA has also approved Sativex®, an oromucosal spray (solution), containing two extracts of Cannabis sativa L., folium cum flore (cannabis leaf and flower), which contain almost the same amount of THC and CBD [16]. Sativex is indicated as a treatment to improve symptoms in adult patients with moderate to severe spasticity due to multiple sclerosis (MS) who have not responded adequately to other anti-spasticity medications and who show clinically significant improvement in symptoms associated with spasticity during an initial trial of therapy. The FDA has not yet approved Sativex in the United States.
An increasing body of evidence-based information available, including multiple CBD human research, now supports the long-standing use of cannabis and CBD products to treat a variety of medical conditions: symptoms of chronic pain, inflammation, cardiovascular disease, mental health issues, spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis and malignancies without serious side effects [17,18]. With the development of novel CBD formulations, smaller doses may lead to increased absorption and, consequently, greater health benefits [19,20,21,22,23].
Nowadays, people are becoming more aware and interested in the natural medicinal aspects of CBD, as it is becoming more widely available in cosmetics and dietary supplements. In Croatia, the Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED) has approved the FDA and EMA-approved cannabinoid-based medication Epidyolex, and all relevant details about the medicine, including interactions with other medicines, are available [24]. The use of unapproved cannabis and cannabis-derived products may have unpredictable and unintended consequences, including serious safety risks, considering that there are CBD products of questionable quality and with inconsistent labelling on the market [11,25]. According to recent studies, young adults have a positive perception of CBD despite having limited knowledge of its evidence base or regulation [26]. Several studies have shown that the pharmacological knowledge of pharmacists, physicians, students, patients, and recreational users in other countries is insufficient regarding cannabis and cannabinoid-derived drugs [12,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. This study aimed to analyze the attitudes and knowledge of physicians, pharmacists, and students in Croatia about the therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoid-derived medicines.

2. Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional survey study was conducted from 30 June to 30 July 2023. Two questionnaires were developed for this study, one to assess the knowledge and attitudes of physicians and pharmacists about the use of CBD for medical purposes and another to assess the knowledge and attitudes of students. The sample of students included medical, pharmacy, and health science students. Both questionnaires were developed by the researcher and were based on a literature review of this particular topic [10,12,28,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].

2.1. Surveys Design

The questionnaire for the students consisted of 20 questions and the physicians’ and pharmacists’ questionnaire consisted of 31 questions. The questions were divided into 5 categories: general questions, self-assessment knowledge questions, researcher-identified knowledge questions, CBD experience questions, and attitude assessment questions about CBD use (Table 1). Attitudes and knowledge regarding CBD were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree), yes/no questions, and categorical questions (with one or more choices).
Surveys were created and distributed using Google Forms online survey administration software offered by Google. The open survey link was sent to physicians and pharmacists across Croatia and students at the Universities of Split (medical, pharmacy, and health students), Zagreb (pharmacy students), and Osijek (medical students). The sample size was determined using the SurveyMonkey sample size calculator [47]. The confidence level was 95% with a margin of error of 5%.
With a target population of 2000 students and 20,000 physicians and pharmacists, the required sample was 323 for students and 377 for physicians and pharmacists. The final sample consisted of 874 participants, of whom 473 were students and 401 were physicians and pharmacists.
The survey was completely anonymous and voluntary, and it was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University Department of Health studies at the University of Split on 26 June 2023 (Class: 029-03/23-08/01; Registration number: 2181-228-103/1-47).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis utilized descriptive statistics to describe responses to survey items. The differences between the groups of study parameters were measured using the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square tests were utilized for comparisons of common perceptions about knowledge and education about CBD between physicians, pharmacists, and surveyed students. Differences and relationships were considered to be statistically significant at p-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package Software for Social Science, version 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

General statistics of study participants who completed the online survey were presented in Table 2 and Table 3. Among demographic data, tables showed participants’ knowledge self-assessment and researcher-assesses knowledge. Our study consisted of a total of 874 participants; students (N = 473), physicians’ and pharmacists’ [N = 401: 100 physicians (52 specialists and 48 general practitioners) and 301 pharmacists (16 specialized pharmacists and 285 pharmacists without specialization)]. The majority of all respondents were female, as in other similar research [12,32,36]. The percentage of female students was 78.65% and the percentage of males was 21.35%. The Croatian Bureau of Statistics reports that 151,827 students were enrolled for the academic year 2022/2023 57.9% of them were female students, and 42.1% were males [48]. The study included responses from 100 physicians from both genders: females (70.0%) and males (30.0%). Among pharmacists’ the proportion of female participants was 85.0% and for males was 15.0%. A representative sample of participants took part in the survey, the Croatian Medical Chamber has 16,089 members (63% female), and the Croatian Chamber of Pharmacists has 4325 members (88.6% female) [49,50].
Participants were not paid for their participation as it was voluntary. Croatian medical studies last six years, while pharmacy and public health studies have five-year programs (with the exception of the 3-year basic public health studies). Croatian students from all years of study enrolled in the academic year 2022/2023 were included in this survey.
Respondents include physicians and pharmacists with a wide range of professional experiences, from one to more than forty years.

3.2. Results of Respondent’s Knowledge about CBD

In our study, we did not find any differences between groups of participants where more than 70% (76.3% and 78.8%) of respondents believe they have general knowledge about CBD (Figure 1 and Table 2). Interestingly, more than 70% (73.2% and 77.6%) of them answered that they did not have a formal education about it.
The majority of participants, with the exception of pharmacists, were generally neutral regarding whether CBD is harmful to health. A significant difference in perceptions of CBD’s hazards was not observed between all student groups (p = 0.059) while a statistical difference was observed between students and a group of physicians and pharmacists (as well as between a group of physicians and pharmacists) (p < 0.05). For participants agreeing with level 1 strongly disagree, there was a statistically significant difference between all respondents’ responses (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A and Table 3).
A significant difference (p < 0.05) was found regarding attitudes toward the efficacy of CBD therapy between all groups of students (Figure 2B) and between pharmacists and physicians. A statistically significant difference was also observed between the responses of all respondents for participants’ agreement level 2-disagree and 5-strongly agree (p < 0.05). (Figure 2B). In general, participants had high and very high attitudes toward the therapeutic value of CBD, especially pharmacists and pharmacy students (63.8% and 72.2%, respectively).

3.3. Results of the Questionnaire Presented Only for Physicians’ and Pharmacists’

In Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 and Table 4 results of the questionnaire presented only for physicians and pharmacists were shown. Figure 3 and Figure 4 showed no significant difference between the group of physicians and pharmacists regarding the FDA-approved indications for CBD as well as their knowledge of CBD side effects.
Additionally, as shown in Figure 5. there was not a significant difference between the groups of physicians and pharmacists regarding knowledge about CBD and drug interactions. Also, physicians and pharmacists are aware of the need for caution while utilizing CBD for specific medical conditions except for reduced body weight (only 11% of physicians and 20% of pharmacists) as it was shown in Figure 6.
Finally, there wasn’t a significant difference in the attitudes between the two groups of participants, physicians, and pharmacists, regarding support of the use of CBD for different medical conditions as it was presented in Figure 7. Most pharmacists and physicians support the use of CBD for malignant conditions and in palliative patients. Furthermore, pharmacists are significantly more convinced that CBD could reduce the use of opioids prescribed for chronic pain, as it was shown in Table 4. Both test groups generally agree that they do not have enough knowledge about the use of CBD for medical purposes and therefore can’t recommend it to patients. Pharmacists and physicians support health insurance coverage for CBD use.

4. Discussion

4.1. Questions Presented in Both Questionnaires

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that explored perceptions and knowledge regarding the therapeutic use of CBD among students in Split, Zagreb, and Osijek, as well as among pharmacists and physicians in Croatia.
This study revealed a gap in knowledge regarding CBD, among both groups since 89.3% of pharmacists and physicians, as well as 84.8% of students, believe they need more education about CBD. As in previous studies [2,12,28,31], most of our respondents also believe that curricula should include lectures on the use of CBD for medicinal purposes. In addition, we also find that 63.6% of students and 54.6% of pharmacists and physicians agreed that taking CBD as therapy is beneficial; this finding is consistent with published research in which participants revealed generally positive attitudes toward medical cannabis therapy [8,27]. Participants in the Schilling et al.’s study [27] revealed a positive attitude toward CBD products as a therapeutic alternative, as they reported positive outcomes and expressed an interest in learning more about CBD from their physicians. Approximately 40% of all our participants believe that CBD use has positive effects on physical and mental health, while about 60% of them believe that CBD treatment is generally efficacious.
However, Goodman et al. [8] observed that little is known about the potential negative effects of CBD. According to our study, only 31.5% of students and 26.2% of physicians and pharmacists considered they were aware of the risks associated with CBD use.
Almost a quarter of all respondents have no knowledge of CBD. This is unexpected among healthcare professionals, considering how widespread CBD products are on the market today. This information is also unexpected from an academic perspective, as nowadays over 500 research on potential indications of CBD have been reported on ClinicalTrials.gov, a well-known website and online database of clinical research studies and information about their results that provide information to the public, researchers and health care professionals (https://clinicaltrials.gov/, accessed on 2 December 2023). The results of our study are consistent with the results of a nationwide survey on CBD use and attitudes in France, where 30% of participants had never heard of CBD [10]. Regarding a question about reading scientific literature on CBD, there was a significant difference between groups as only 17.5% of students had read scientific papers about CBD, compared to a significantly higher percentage of physicians and pharmacists (43% and 47.8%, respectively).
Due to students’ significantly greater CBD use than physicians and pharmacists, the results confirm our expectations that CBD consumption is associated with students, who are a younger age group than professionals, as was shown in previous studies [10,51]. Our results show that among all students, pharmacists (84.8%) have the most knowledge about CBD, followed by health (73.6%) and medical students (70.7%). This result is in contrast to the same conducted in Austria where medical students had the most knowledge about CBD [28].

4.2. Specific Knowledge of CBD among Physicians and Pharmacists

Based on the study’s results, physicians and pharmacists frequently link the FDA-approved indications for CBD with the ones for dronabinol and nabilone. However, the indication for epileptic seizures in LGS (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome) and Dravet syndrome was more often recognized by pharmacists (36%) than by physicians (23%), with participants mostly unaware that tuberous sclerosis is also among indications [24].
Physicians and pharmacists more often indicated pain associated with malignant diseases, chronic neuropathic pain, and chemotherapy-related nausea as a possible FDA-approved indication, although FDA-approved indications are only seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) or Dravet syndrome (DS) and for seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.
Somnolence, reduced appetite, diarrhea, and vomiting are the most commonly reported side effects of CBD. Participants’ knowledge was generally good, with the exception of tachycardia, which was selected by more than one-third of physicians and pharmacists. Previous studies have shown that CBD lowers heart rate, diastolic pressure, and MAP (mean arterial pressure) without causing tachycardia [19,52]. Participants mainly recognize carbamazepine, valproate, rifampicin, clobazam, and everolimus as drugs that have the greatest interactions with CBD. Although there was no significant difference in knowledge, pharmacists were more familiar with interactions. Medical conditions that require caution when taking CBD (somnolence and sedation, suicidal behaviour, hepatocellular damage) were generally well-known to respondents. They are mostly unaware that caution is required even with reduced body weight (only 20% of pharmacists and 11% of physicians are aware) and that heart arrhythmia does not require caution when dosing CBD (43% of pharmacists and 48% of physicians).
In contrast to physicians, pharmacists are significantly more likely to believe that recommending/prescribing CBD could reduce opioid use for chronic pain, as some research suggests [53]. In their study, McNabb et al. [53] proved that the consumption of pharmaceutical medications and other substances by veterans could potentially be reduced due to medicinal cannabis. Physicians and pharmacists agree that they do not have enough knowledge about the use of CBD for medical purposes and, therefore, cannot recommend it to their patients (94% and 88.7%, respectively).
Knowledge about CBD was found to be insufficient among medical students and healthcare professionals in the prior studies [12,28,31,32,54]. Participants agree that health insurance should cover the cost of CBD when a physician prescribes it as a therapy. Epidyolex is now available only with a restricted prescription and is entirely paid for by the patient in Croatia (more than 12 hundred euros per bottle of 100 mL) [24].

4.3. Study Limitations

This cross-sectional study has certain limitations. Despite the representative sample of participants, we were limited to a small percentage of physicians compared to the total number of physicians in Croatia, in contrast to the substantial number of participants- pharmacists. With the large final sample size, we believe that the effects were partially reduced. Another limitation was that students from other biomedical faculties in Croatia were not included in the survey.

5. Conclusions

The results of our survey indicate that current and future healthcare professionals involved in the process of patients’ medication, medical, pharmacy, and health students, as well as physicians and pharmacists, believe they need additional education on the proper and safe use of CBD. Therefore, it is indispensable to improve the educational curricula so that medical professionals have more knowledge and can recommend CBD use to their patients when needed. Nevertheless, physicians and pharmacists have shown that although they have close to enough knowledge about the indications, side effects, and interactions of CBD, they hardly prescribe and/or recommend it.
We assume that the reason for this, in addition to the uncertainty in knowledge, is the high price of the product. Therefore, it is understandable that physicians and pharmacists generally support that health insurance should cover the cost of the medicine. Further research is required to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the specific challenges and factors influencing knowledge gaps in these areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmacy12010002/s1, Attitudes and knowledge of doctors and pharmacists about the use of medical CBD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S., A.B., A.C. and J.B., methodology, D.S., A.B., A.C., J.B., I.Ž., B.M., L.G.-O. and Z.D.; analysis A.B., A.C., N.K., S.K., B.M., A.S. and G.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B., D.S., J.B. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, D.S., A.B., I.Ž., L.G.-O., A.V. and Z.D.; visualization, A.B. and D.S.; supervision, D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Department of Health Studies, University of Split on 26 June 2023. (Class: 029-03/23-08/01; Reg. No.: 2181-228-103/1-47). All the procedures conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study. Participation in the anonymous questionnaire was considered consent based on notice at the beginning of the questionnaire.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Croatian chamber of pharmacists for their support and help in sending invitations to members of the chamber for their participation in the questionnaire. Additionally, the authors are thankful to all the professionals, physicians, and pharmacists, as well as students for their participation in this first Croatian study about the knowledge and attitudes of cannabidiol (CBD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Helmer, S.M.; Mikolajczyk, R.T.; McAlaney, J.; Vriesacker, B.; Van Hal, G.; Akvardar, Y.; Guillen-Grima, F.; Salonna, F.; Stock, C.; Dempsey, R.C.; et al. Illicit substance use among university students from seven European countries: A comparison of personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards illicit substance use. Prev. Med. 2014, 67, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Moeller, K.E.; McGuire, J.M.; Melton, B.L. A nationwide survey of pharmacy students’ knowledge and perceptions regarding medical cannabis. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2020, 60, 218–224.e213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Radwan, M.M.; ElSohly, M.A.; El-Alfy, A.T.; Ahmed, S.A.; Slade, D.; Husni, A.S.; Manly, S.P.; Wilson, L.; Seale, S.; Cutler, S.J.; et al. Isolation and Pharmacological Evaluation of Minor Cannabinoids from High-Potency Cannabis sativa. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1271–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bhamra, S.K.; Desai, A.; Imani-Berendjestanki, P.; Horgan, M. The emerging role of cannabidiol (CBD) products; a survey exploring the public’s use and perceptions of CBD. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 5734–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Calabrese, E.J.; Rubio-Casillas, A. Biphasic effects of THC in memory and cognition. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 48, e12920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chesney, E.; Oliver, D.; Green, A.; Sovi, S.; Wilson, J.; Englund, A.; Freeman, T.P.; McGuire, P. Adverse effects of cannabidiol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 45, 1799–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Taylor, L.; Gidal, B.; Blakey, G.; Tayo, B.; Morrison, G. A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose, Multiple Dose, and Food Effect Trial of the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Highly Purified Cannabidiol in Healthy Subjects. CNS Drugs 2018, 32, 1053–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goodman, S.; Wadsworth, E.; Schauer, G.; Hammond, D. Use and Perceptions of Cannabidiol Products in Canada and in the United States. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022, 7, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Levinsohn, E.A.; Hill, K.P. Clinical uses of cannabis and cannabinoids in the United States. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 411, 116717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Casanova, C.; Ramier, C.; Fortin, D.; Carrieri, P.; Mancini, J.; Barre, T. Cannabidiol use and perceptions in France: A national survey. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. FDA and Cannabis: Research and Drug Approval Process. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/fda-and-cannabis-research-and-drug-approval-process (accessed on 22 July 2023).
  12. Bazzari, F.H.; Bazzari, A.H. Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding the Therapeutic Use of Cannabinoids among Community Pharmacists: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study in Amman, Jordan. Healthcare 2023, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Abu-Sawwa, R.; Chase, A.; Fowowe, O.; Park, Y. Effects of Epidiolex (Cannabidiol) on seizure-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions: A retrospective cohort study. Epilepsy Behav. 2022, 127, 108538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cooper, Z.D.; Comer, S.D.; Haney, M. Comparison of the analgesic effects of dronabinol and smoked marijuana in daily marijuana smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 1984–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Epidyolex. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/epidyolex (accessed on 22 July 2023).
  16. Sativex. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/paediatric-investigation-plans/emea-000181-pip02-13-m01 (accessed on 23 July 2023).
  17. Khalsa, J.H.; Bunt, G.; Blum, K.; Maggirwar, S.B.; Galanter, M.; Potenza, M.N. Review: Cannabinoids as Medicinals. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2022, 9, 630–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zeraatkar, D.; Cooper, M.A.; Agarwal, A.; Vernooij, R.W.M.; Leung, G.; Loniewski, K.; Dookie, J.E.; Ahmed, M.M.; Hong, B.Y.; Hong, C.; et al. Long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis and cannabinoids for chronic pain: A systematic review of non-randomised studies. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e054282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Batinic, A.; Sutlović, D.; Kuret, S.; Matana, A.; Kumric, M.; Bozic, J.; Dujic, Z. Trial of a Novel Oral Cannabinoid Formulation in Patients with Hypertension: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pharmacogenetic Study. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Batinic, A.; Sutlovic, D.; Kuret, S.; Burcul, F.; Kalajzic, N.; Matana, A.; Dujic, G.; Vrdoljak, J.; Kumric, M.; Bozic, J.; et al. Differences in Plasma Cannabidiol Concentrations in Women and Men: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Patrician, A.; Versic-Bratincevic, M.; Mijacika, T.; Banic, I.; Marendic, M.; Sutlovic, D.; Dujic, Z.; Ainslie, P.N. Examination of a New Delivery Approach for Oral Cannabidiol in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pharmacokinetics Study. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 3196–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dujic, G.; Kumric, M.; Vrdoljak, J.; Dujic, Z.; Bozic, J. Chronic Effects of Oral Cannabidiol Delivery on 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients with Hypertension (HYPER-H21-4): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, and Crossover Study. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dragun, T.; Brown, C.V.; Tulppo, M.P.; Obad, A.; Dujić, Ž. The Influence of Oral Cannabidiol on 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Untreated Hypertension: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Pilot Study. Adv. Ther. 2023, 40, 3495–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. HALMED: Baza Lijekova: Epidyolex. Available online: https://www.halmed.hr/Lijekovi/Baza-lijekova/Epidyolex/15646/ (accessed on 23 July 2023).
  25. Miller, O.S.; Elder, E.J., Jr.; Jones, K.J.; Gidal, B.E. Analysis of cannabidiol (CBD) and THC in nonprescription consumer products: Implications for patients and practitioners. Epilepsy Behav. 2022, 127, 108514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wysota, C.N.; Le, D.; Clausen, M.E.; Ciceron, A.C.; Fuss, C.; Bennett, B.; Romm, K.F.; Duan, Z.; Berg, C.J. Young adults’ knowledge, perceptions and use of cannabidiol products: A mixed-methods study. Health Educ. Res. 2022, 37, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schilling, J.M.; Hughes, C.G.; Wallace, M.S.; Sexton, M.; Backonja, M.; Moeller-Bertram, T. Cannabidiol as a Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Survey of Patients’ Perspectives and Attitudes. J. Pain Res. 2021, 14, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Felnhofer, A.; Kothgassner, O.D.; Stoll, A.; Klier, C. Knowledge about and attitudes towards medical cannabis among Austrian university students. Complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 58, 102700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Spinella, T.C.; Bartholomeusz, J.; Stewart, S.H.; Barrett, S.P. Perceptions about THC and CBD effects among adults with and without prior cannabis experience. Addict. Behav. 2023, 137, 107508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stayduhar, J.M.; Covvey, J.R.; Schreiber, J.B.; Witt-Enderby, P.A. Pharmacist and Student Knowledge and Perceptions of Herbal Supplements and Natural Products. Pharmacy 2023, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jacobs, R.J.; Colon, J.; Kane, M.N. Medical Students’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Beliefs about Medical Cannabis: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Cureus 2022, 14, e28336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kruger, D.J.; Mokbel, M.A.; Clauw, D.J.; Boehnke, K.F. Assessing Health Care Providers’ Knowledge of Medical Cannabis. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022, 7, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bawa, Z.; Saini, B.; McCartney, D.; Bedoya-Perez, M.; McLachlan, A.J.; McGregor, I.S. A cross-sectional survey exploring the knowledge, experiences and attitudes of Australian pharmacists toward medicinal cannabis. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2023, 45, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Philpot, L.M.; Ebbert, J.O.; Hurt, R.T. A survey of the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about medical cannabis among primary care providers. BMC Fam. Pract. 2019, 20, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Emmerling, S.; Martin, B.; Schmitz, N. A survey of Wisconsin pharmacists about cannabinoid products: Are we ready to recommend? J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2021, 61, e71–e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chung, A.K.; Tse, C.Y.; Law, J.K. Attitudes and beliefs of medical students on cannabis in Hong Kong. Complement. Ther. Med. 2022, 70, 102870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Szaflarski, M.; McGoldrick, P.; Currens, L.; Blodgett, D.; Land, H.; Szaflarski, J.P.; Segal, E. Attitudes and knowledge about cannabis and cannabis-based therapies among US neurologists, nurses, and pharmacists. Epilepsy Behav. 2020, 109, 107102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. King, D.D.; DeCarlo, M.; Mylott, L.; Yarossi, M. Cannabis knowledge gaps in nursing education: Pilot testing cannabis curriculum. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 2023, 18, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Patel, S.; Doroudgar, S.; Ip, E.J. Community pharmacists’ lack of knowledge and confidence in non-prescription cannabidiol products. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. RSAP 2021, 17, 1356–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gardiner, K.M.; Singleton, J.A.; Sheridan, J.; Kyle, G.J.; Nissen, L.M. Health professional beliefs, knowledge, and concerns surrounding medicinal cannabis—A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karanges, E.A.; Suraev, A.; Elias, N.; Manocha, R.; McGregor, I.S. Knowledge and attitudes of Australian general practitioners towards medicinal cannabis: A cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e022101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nichols, M.A.; Arnett, S.J.; Fa, B.; Marchionda, R.A.; Cutting, M.C.; McDonald, M.R.; Miller, M.L. National survey identifying community pharmacist preceptors’ experience, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors influencing intent to recommend cannabidiol products. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2021, 61, S91–S104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kruger, D.J.; Gerlach, J.; Kruger, J.S.; Mokbel, M.A.; Clauw, D.J.; Boehnke, K.F. Physicians’ Attitudes and Practices Regarding Cannabis and Recommending Medical Cannabis Use. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sharma, P.; Holland, A.; Sheikh, T.; Novy, B.; Oesterle, T.; Platt, R.; Hammond, C.J. Primary care provider attitudes, experiences and practices about cannabidiol (CBD) and barriers to patient-provider communication about CBD use: A qualitative study. PEC Innov. 2022, 1, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Caligiuri, F.J.; Ulrich, E.E.; Welter, K.J. Pharmacy Student Knowledge, Confidence and Attitudes Toward Medical Cannabis and Curricular Coverage. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2018, 82, 6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Eysenbach, G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J. Med. Internet Res. 2004, 6, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. SurveyMonkey Inc. Available online: https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/ (accessed on 11 June 2023).
  48. Croatian Bureau of Statistics. Students Enrolled on Professional and University Study in Winter Semester, According to Place of Permanent Residence, Academic Year; Croatian Bureau of Statistics: Zagreb, Croatia, 2023; Available online: https://podaci.dzs.hr/hr/statistika-u-nizu/ (accessed on 17 September 2023).
  49. Croatian Chamber of Pharmacists. Register of Pharmacists. Zagreb, Croatia. Available online: https://www.hljk.hr/registar-ljekarnika-s36 (accessed on 18 September 2023).
  50. Croatian Medical Chamber. Digital Atlas of Croatian Medicine. Zagreb, Croatia. Available online: https://www.hlk.hr/digitalni-atlas-hrvatskog-lijecnistva.aspx (accessed on 18 September 2023.).
  51. Fedorova, E.V.; Wong, C.F.; Ataiants, J.; Iverson, E.; Conn, B.M.; Lankenau, S.E. Cannabidiol (CBD) and other drug use among young adults who use cannabis in Los Angeles. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 2021, 221, 108648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sultan, S.R.; O’Sullivan, S.E.; England, T.J. The effects of acute and sustained cannabidiol dosing for seven days on the haemodynamics in healthy men: A randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 86, 1125–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McNabb, M.; Durante, K.A.; Trocchio, S.; Ritter, D.J.; MacCaffrie, R.; Brum, A.; Mandile, S.; White, S. Self-reported Medicinal Cannabis Use as an Alternative to Prescription and Over-the-counter Medication Use Among US Military Veterans. Clin. Ther. 2023, 45, 562–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weisman, J.M.; Rodriguez, M. A systematic review of medical students’ and professionals’ attitudes and knowledge regarding medical cannabis. J. Cannabis Res. 2021, 3, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmacy 12 00002 g001
Figure 1. Percentage of participants’ knowledge about CBD. On the y-axis, the percentage of respondents’ responses is displayed. The x-axis is shown as follows: (A) shows the distribution of respondents by gender (F—female and M—male) for the student, doctor, and pharmacist groups; (B) shows the respondents’ years of study for the student group; and (C) shows the respondents’ number of years of working experience for the doctor and pharmacist group. The answer trend Yes is positively correlated: in the examined group of students from 1 to 4 years of study (B) and in the group of doctors and pharmacists depending on the years of work experience.
Figure 1. Percentage of participants’ knowledge about CBD. On the y-axis, the percentage of respondents’ responses is displayed. The x-axis is shown as follows: (A) shows the distribution of respondents by gender (F—female and M—male) for the student, doctor, and pharmacist groups; (B) shows the respondents’ years of study for the student group; and (C) shows the respondents’ number of years of working experience for the doctor and pharmacist group. The answer trend Yes is positively correlated: in the examined group of students from 1 to 4 years of study (B) and in the group of doctors and pharmacists depending on the years of work experience.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g001
Pharmacy 12 00002 g002
Figure 2. Percentage of participants’ attitudes regarding questions: (A)—shows the answers to the questions “CBD is bad for health”, (B)—shows the answers to the questions “CBD treatment is efficacious” Difference between groups: χ2 Test. On the y-axis, the percentage of respondents’ responses is displayed. On the y-axis is displayed participants agreement level: 1—strongly disagree; 2—disagree; 3—neutral; 4—agree; and 5—strongly agree.
Figure 2. Percentage of participants’ attitudes regarding questions: (A)—shows the answers to the questions “CBD is bad for health”, (B)—shows the answers to the questions “CBD treatment is efficacious” Difference between groups: χ2 Test. On the y-axis, the percentage of respondents’ responses is displayed. On the y-axis is displayed participants agreement level: 1—strongly disagree; 2—disagree; 3—neutral; 4—agree; and 5—strongly agree.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g002
Pharmacy 12 00002 g003
Figure 3. Percentages of pharmacists’ and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding the FDA-approved indications for CBD (LGS: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome). The difference between groups for each indication was made using the χ2 Test.
Figure 3. Percentages of pharmacists’ and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding the FDA-approved indications for CBD (LGS: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome). The difference between groups for each indication was made using the χ2 Test.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g003
Pharmacy 12 00002 g004
Figure 4. Percentages of pharmacists and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding the CBD side effects. The difference between groups for each side effect was made using the χ2 Test.
Figure 4. Percentages of pharmacists and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding the CBD side effects. The difference between groups for each side effect was made using the χ2 Test.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g004
Pharmacy 12 00002 g005
Figure 5. Percentages of pharmacists and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding CBD and drug interactions. The difference between groups for each drug interaction was made using the χ2 Test.
Figure 5. Percentages of pharmacists and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding CBD and drug interactions. The difference between groups for each drug interaction was made using the χ2 Test.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g005
Pharmacy 12 00002 g006
Figure 6. Percentages of pharmacists’ and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding different medical conditions when ingestion of CBD requires caution. The difference between groups for each medical condition was made using the χ2 Test.
Figure 6. Percentages of pharmacists’ and physicians’ affirmative responses regarding different medical conditions when ingestion of CBD requires caution. The difference between groups for each medical condition was made using the χ2 Test.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g006
Pharmacy 12 00002 g007
Figure 7. Percentages of pharmacists and physicians who support the use of CBD for different medical conditions. The difference between groups for each medical condition was made using the χ2 Test.
Figure 7. Percentages of pharmacists and physicians who support the use of CBD for different medical conditions. The difference between groups for each medical condition was made using the χ2 Test.
Pharmacy 12 00002 g007
Table 1. Surveys design: categories and questions for respondents.
Table 1. Surveys design: categories and questions for respondents.
Question CategoryPhysicians’ and Pharmacist’ QuestionnaireStudents’ Questionnaire
GeneralGender, profession, specialization, years of work in practice, county of residence Gender, study program, year of study
Questions represented in both questionnaires
Knowledge self-assessmentDo you have knowledge about CBD?
Through my formal education, I had an education about CBD.
I think that I need more education about CBD.
I am aware of CBD use risks.
I am aware of CBD use benefits.
Researcher-assessed knowledgeCBD is bad for health.
CBD treatment is efficacious.
CBD has positive effects on physical health.
CBD has positive effects on mental health.
CBD helps patients with chronically debilitating conditions.
CBD is physically addictive.
CBD is psychologically addictive.
Using CBD can lead to addiction to other opioids and drugs.
CBD causes a feeling of euphoria.
Have you ever read a scientific paper about CBD?
CBD experienceHave you ever consumed CBD?
Attitudes about CBD useThe educational curricula of Physicians, health professionals, and pharmacists should include subjects on the use of CBD for medical purposes.
Questions presented in physicians’ and pharmacists’ questionnaire only
Knowledge self-assessmentI believe that I have enough knowledge about the use of CBD for medical purposes and that I can recommend it to patients.
Researcher-assessed knowledgeFDA has approved CBD drugs for nausea associated with chemotherapy, chronic neuropathic pain, EPI attacks in Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndrome, depressive disorders, Parkinson’s disease, tuberous sclerosis, and pain in malignant diseases. **
Side effects of CBD are anemia, tachycardia, diarrhea and vomiting, glaucoma, decreased appetite, hyperglycemia, and somnolence. **
Medications that have moderate or severe interactions with CBD include: paracetamol, valproat, omeprazole, karbamazepin, ibuprofen, rifampicin, amoksicilin, everolimus, klobazam, fehidramin. **
Conditions that require caution when using CBD are cardiac arrhythmia, hepatocellular damage, glaucoma, somnolence, cancer, reduced body weight, pregnancy, suicidal behaviour, somnolence, and sedation. **
CBD experienceHave you ever recommended/prescribed CBD to your patients?
Attitudes about CBD useI support the use of CBD in palliative patients, cancer pain relief, side effects of chemotherapy, multiple sclerosis, neuropathic pain, chronic pain, PTSD, insomnia, Crohn’s disease, glaucoma, hepatitis C, muscle spasticity, HIV, traumatic brain injury, ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, anorexia, Parkinson’s disease, migraine. **
I believe that recommending/prescribing CBD could reduce the use of opioids in chronic pain.
I believe that health insurance should cover the cost of CBD if a doctor prescribes it as therapy.
** Check all that apply.
Table 2. Study sample general characteristics and knowledge self-assessment of Croatian students (N = 473), physicians (N = 100), and pharmacists (N = 301).
Table 2. Study sample general characteristics and knowledge self-assessment of Croatian students (N = 473), physicians (N = 100), and pharmacists (N = 301).
VariableStudents
N (%)		Physicians’ and Pharmacists’ N (%)Difference between
Groups
χ2 Test
GenderF372 (78.6)326 (81.3)p = 0.330
M101 (21.4)75 (18.7)
Study programMedical150 (31.7)-
Pharmacy198 (41.9)-
Health125 (26.4)-
Year of study program
Medical 1–6; Pharmacy 1–5		1111 (23.5)-
292 (19.5)-
392 (19.5)-
471 (15.0)-
550 (10.6)-
657 (12.1)-
Years of work in practice
physicians’/pharmacists’
(N = 401)		1–5-135 (33.7)
6–10-50 (12.5)
11–20-101 (25.2)
21–30-65 (16.2)
31–40-34 (8.5)
>40-16 (4.0)
Do you have knowledge about CBD?Yes361 (76.3)316 (78.8)p = 0.382
No112 (23.7)85 (21.2)
Through my formal education, I had an education about CBD.Yes127 (26.8)90 (22.4)p = 0.136
No346 (73.2)311 (77.6)
Have you ever read a scientific paper about CBD?Yes83 (17.5)187 (46.6)p < 0.05
No390 (82.5)214 (53.4)
Have you ever consumed CBD?Yes120 (25.4)65 (16.2)p < 0.05
No353 (74.6)336 (83.8)
The educational curricula of Physicians, health professionals, and pharmacists should include subjects on The use of CBD for medical purposes.111 (2.3)14 (3.5)p < 0.05
215 (3.2)9 (2.2)
367 (14.2)39 (9.7)
4143 (30.2)85 (21.2)
5237 (50.1)254 (63.3)
I think that I need more education about CBD.117 (3.6)10 (2.5)p < 0.05
211 (2.3)15 (3.7)
344 (9.3)18 (4.5)
4108 (22.8)61 (15.2)
5293 (61.9)297 (74.1)
I am aware of CBD use risks.188 (18.6)61 (15.2)p < 0.05
296 (20.3)78 (19.5)
3140 (29.6)157 (39.2)
491 (19.2)70 (17.5)
558 (12.3)35 (8.7)
I am aware of CBD use benefits.150 (10.6)33 (8.2)p < 0.05
275 (15.9)36 (9.0)
3144 (30.4)162 (40.4)
4155 (32.8)136 (33.9)
549 (10.4)34 (8.5)
Participants agreement level: 1—strongly disagree; 2—disagree; 3—neutral; 4—agree; and 5—strongly agree.
Table 3. Researcher assessment of knowledge and differences between analyzed groups: Croatian students (N = 473), physicians (N = 100), and pharmacists (N = 301).
Table 3. Researcher assessment of knowledge and differences between analyzed groups: Croatian students (N = 473), physicians (N = 100), and pharmacists (N = 301).
Variable* Participants Agreement LevelStudents N (%)Physicians’ and Pharmacists’ N (%)Difference between
Groups
χ2 Test
CBD is bad for health.173 (15.4)104 (25.9)p < 0.05
2121 (25.6)123 (30.7)
3205 (43.3)133 (33.2)
443 (9.1)31 (7.7)
531 (6.6)10 (2.5)
CBD treatment is efficacious.17 (1.5)8 (2.0)p = 0.408
225 (5.3)29 (7.2)
3140 (29.6)133 (33.2)
4200 (42.3)157 (39.2)
5101 (21.4)74 (18.5)
CBD has positive effects on physical health.121 (4.4)11 (2.7)p = 0.158
237 (7.8)29 (7.2)
3225 (47.6)168 (41.9)
4140 (29.6)145 (36.2)
550 (10.6)48 (12.0)
CBD has positive effects on mental health.141 (8.7)21 (5.2)p = 0.092
275 (15.9)49 (12.2)
3181 (38.3)164 (40.9)
4126 (26.6)127 (31.7)
550 (10.6)40 (10.0)
CBD helps patients with chronically debilitating conditions.15 (1.1)5 (1.2)p = 0.546
218 (3.8)12 (3.0)
3120 (25.4)112 (27.9)
4194 (41.0)175 (43.6)
5136 (28.8)97 (24.2)
CBD is physically addictive.174 (15.6)92 (22.9)p < 0.05
298 (20.7)89 (22.2)
3168 (35.5)143 (35.7)
488 (18.6)46 (11.5)
545 (9.5)31 (7.7)
CBD is psychologically addictive.140 (8.5)71 (17.7)p < 0.05
258 (12.3)70 (17.5)
3164 (34.7)136 (33.9)
4125 (26.4)77 (19.2)
586 (18.2)47 (11.7)
Using CBD can lead to addiction to other opioids and drugs.187 (18.4)126 (31.4)p < 0.05
288 (18.6)91 (22.7)
3155 (32.8)115 (28.7)
487 (18.4)38 (9.5)
556 (11.8)31 (7.7)
CBD causes a feeling of euphoria.181 (17.1)118 (29.4)p < 0.05
286 (18.2)100 (24.9)
3177 (37.4)126 (31.4)
477 (16.3)38 (9.5)
552 (11.0)19 (4.7)
* Participants agreement level: 1—strongly disagree; 2—disagree; 3—neutral; 4—agree; and 5—strongly agree.
Table 4. Differences between physicians’ and pharmacists’ attitudes and knowledge about prescribing/recommending the use of CBD. The difference between groups was made using the χ2 Test.
Table 4. Differences between physicians’ and pharmacists’ attitudes and knowledge about prescribing/recommending the use of CBD. The difference between groups was made using the χ2 Test.
VariablePhysicians
n (%)		Pharmacists
n (%)		Differences between Groups
(χ2 Test)
Question 25
I believe that recommending/prescribing CBD could reduce the use of opioids in chronic pain.		Yes6 (6)251 (83.4)p < 0.05
No94 (94)50 (16.6)
Question 26
I believe that I have enough knowledge about the use of CBD for medical purposes and that I can recommend it to patients.		Yes6 (6)34 (11.3)p = 0.126
No94 (94)267 (88.7)
Question 27
Have you ever recommended/prescribed the use of CBD to patients in your practice so far?		Yes, just once5 (5)25 (8.3)p = 0.108
Yes, more than once1 (1)19 (6.3)
Yes, often to patients with specific diagnoses2 (2)7 (2.3)
No92 (92)250 (83.1)
Question 28
I believe that healthcare insurance should cover the cost of CBD if a doctor prescribes it as therapy.		Yes83 (83)256 (85.0)p = 0.623
No17 (17)45 (15.0)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batinic, A.; Curkovic, A.; Bukic, J.; Žuntar, I.; Kuret, S.; Mimica, B.; Kalajzic, N.; Dujic, G.; Glavaš-Obrovac, L.; Soldo, A.; et al. Knowledge and Attitudes of Cannabidiol in Croatia among Students, Physicians, and Pharmacists. Pharmacy 2024, 12, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12010002

AMA Style

Batinic A, Curkovic A, Bukic J, Žuntar I, Kuret S, Mimica B, Kalajzic N, Dujic G, Glavaš-Obrovac L, Soldo A, et al. Knowledge and Attitudes of Cannabidiol in Croatia among Students, Physicians, and Pharmacists. Pharmacy. 2024; 12(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batinic, Ana, Ana Curkovic, Josipa Bukic, Irena Žuntar, Sendi Kuret, Bianka Mimica, Nina Kalajzic, Goran Dujic, Ljubica Glavaš-Obrovac, Ana Soldo, and et al. 2024. "Knowledge and Attitudes of Cannabidiol in Croatia among Students, Physicians, and Pharmacists" Pharmacy 12, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12010002

APA Style

Batinic, A., Curkovic, A., Bukic, J., Žuntar, I., Kuret, S., Mimica, B., Kalajzic, N., Dujic, G., Glavaš-Obrovac, L., Soldo, A., Včeva, A., Dujic, Z., & Sutlovic, D. (2024). Knowledge and Attitudes of Cannabidiol in Croatia among Students, Physicians, and Pharmacists. Pharmacy, 12(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop