Correlates of Climate Change Action Communication Modalities in the United States
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Measures
2.2. Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Romanello, M.; Di Napoli, C.; Drummond, P.; Green, C.; Kennard, H.; Lampard, P.; Scamman, D.; Arnell, N.; Ayeb-Karlsson, S.; Ford, L.B.; et al. The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Health at the mercy of fossil fuels. Lancet 2022, 400, 1619–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basseches, J.A.; Bromley-Trujillo, R.; Boykoff, M.T.; Culhane, T.; Hall, G.; Healy, N.; Hess, D.J.; Hsu, D.; Krause, R.M.; Prechel, H.; et al. Climate policy conflict in the U.S. states: A critical review and way forward. Clim. Chang. 2022, 170, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bayes, R.; Bolsen, T.; Druckman, J.N. A research agenda for climate change communication and public opinion: The role of scientific consensus messaging and beyond. Environ. Commun. 2023, 17, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolsen, T.; Palm, R.; Kingsland, J.T. The impact of message source on the effectiveness of communications about climate change. Sci. Commun. 2019, 41, 464–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León, B.; Bourk, M.; Finkler, W.; Boykoff, M.; Davis, L.S. Strategies for climate change communication through social media: Objectives, approach, and interaction. Media Int. Aust. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fogg-Rogers, L.; Hayes, E.; Vanherle, K.; Pápics, P.I.; Chatterton, T.; Barnes, J.; Slingerland, S.; Boushel, C.; Laggan, S.; Longhurst, J. Applying Social Learning to Climate Communications—Visualising ‘People Like Me’ in Air Pollution and Climate Change Data. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffy, M.A. Why We Should Preach to the Climate Change Choir: The Importance of Science Communication That Engages People Who Already Accept Climate Change. Am. Nat. 2021, 198, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreindler, G.E.; Young, H.P. Rapid innovation diffusion in social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111 (Suppl. S3), 10881–10888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carey, J.W. Communication as Culture, Revised Edition: Essays on Media and Society; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Cui, J.; Ma, J. Social Influence Study in Online Networks: A Three-Level Review. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2015, 30, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannibal, B.; Vedlitz, A. Social Capital, Knowledge, and the Environment: The Effect of Interpersonal Communication on Climate Change Knowledge and Policy Preferences. Sociol. Spectr. 2018, 38, 277–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, W. Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2000, 51, 539–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vesely, S.; Masson, T.; Chokrai, P.; Becker, A.M.; Fritsche, I.; Klöckner, C.A.; Tiberio, L.; Carrus, G.; Panno, A. Climate change action as a project of identity: Eight meta-analyses. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2021, 70, 102322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.; Ho, S.S.; Yang, X. Motivators of Pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining the Underlying Processes in the Influence of Presumed Media Influence Model. Sci. Commun. 2016, 38, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perry, G.L.W.; Richardson, S.J.; Harré, N.; Hodges, D.; Lyver, P.O.; Maseyk, F.J.F.; Taylor, R.; Todd, J.H.; Tylianakis, J.M.; Yletyinen, J.; et al. Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 620125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saracevic, S.; Schlegelmilch, B.B. The Impact of Social Norms on Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of The Role of Culture and Self-Construal. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrow, K.; Grolleau, G.; Ibanez, L. Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 140, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geiger, N.; Swim, J.K. Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 47, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latkin, C.; Dayton, L.; Scherkoske, M.; Countess, K.; Thrul, J. What predicts climate change activism?: An examination of how depressive symptoms, climate change distress, and social norms are associated with climate change activism. J. Clim. Chang. Health 2022, 8, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Summary for Policymakers; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Noelle-Neumann, E.; Petersen, T. The Spiral of Silence and the Social Nature of Man. In Handbook of Political Communication Research; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 339–356. [Google Scholar]
- Tyson, A. On Climate Change, Republicans Are Open to Some Policy Approaches, Even as They Assign the Issue Low Priority. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/07/23/on-climate-change-republicans-are-open-to-some-policy-approaches-even-as-they-assign-the-issue-low-priority/ (accessed on 4 February 2022).
- Wong-Parodi, G.; Feygina, I. Engaging People on Climate Change: The Role of Emotional Responses. Environ. Commun. 2021, 15, 571–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leiserowitz, A.; Maibach, E.; Rosenthal, S.; Kotcher, J.; Carman, J.; Neyens, L.; Marlon, J.; Lacroix, K.; Goldberg, M. Climate Change in the American Mind, September 2021; Yale University and George Mason University: New Haven, CT, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Lacroix, K.; Gifford, R.; Chen, A. Developing and validating the Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers (DIPB) scale. J. Environ. Psychol. 2019, 63, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gifford, R. The Dragons of Inaction: Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Am. Psychol. 2011, 66, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boulianne, S.; Lalancette, M.; Ilkiw, D. “School Strike 4 Climate”: Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change. Media Commun. 2020, 8, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baiardi, D. What do you think about climate change? J. Econ. Surv. 2022; early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, R.; Xu, J. A Comparative Study of the Role of Interpersonal Communication, Traditional Media and Social Media in Pro-Environmental Behavior: A China-Based Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavrodieva, A.V.; Rachman, O.K.; Harahap, V.B.; Shaw, R. Role of Social Media as a Soft Power Tool in Raising Public Awareness and Engagement in Addressing Climate Change. Climate 2019, 7, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deo, K.; Prasad, A.A. Evidence of Climate Change Engagement Behaviour on a Facebook Fan-Based Page. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, H.T.P.; McMurray, J.R.; Kurz, T.; Hugo Lambert, F. Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 32, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Effrosynidis, D.; Sylaios, G.; Arampatzis, A. Exploring climate change on Twitter using seven aspects: Stance, sentiment, aggressiveness, temperature, gender, topics, and disasters. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0274213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyagi, A.; Uyheng, J.; Carley, K.M. Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), The Hague, The Netherlands, 7–10 December 2020; pp. 443–447. [Google Scholar]
- Haunschild, R.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Hellsten, I.; Marx, W. Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. J. Informetr. 2019, 13, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becken, S.; Stantic, B.; Chen, J.; Connolly, R.M. Twitter conversations reveal issue salience of aviation in the broader context of climate change. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2022, 98, 102157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peer, E.; Rothschild, D.; Gordon, A.; Evernden, Z.; Damer, E. Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods 2022, 54, 1643–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doherty, K.; Webler, T. Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the Alarmed segment’s public-sphere climate actions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Pagano, I.; Borth, A.; Campbell, E.; Hubbert, B.; Kotcher, J.; Maibach, E. Health professional’s willingness to advocate for strengthening global commitments to the Paris climate agreement: Findings from a multi-nation survey. J. Clim. Chang. Health 2021, 2, 100016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latkin, C.; Dayton, L.; Bonneau, H.; Bhaktaram, A.; Ross, J.; Pugel, J.; Latshaw, M.W. Perceived Barriers to Climate Change Activism Behaviors in the United States Among Individuals Highly Concerned about Climate Change. J. Prev. 2022, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byerly, H.; Balmford, A.; Ferraro, P.J.; Hammond Wagner, C.; Palchak, E.; Polasky, S.; Ricketts, T.H.; Schwartz, A.J.; Fisher, B. Nudging pro-environmental behavior: Evidence and opportunities. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2018, 16, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klas, A.; Zinkiewicz, L.; Zhou, J.; Clarke, E.J.R. “Not All Environmentalists Are Like That … ”: Unpacking the Negative and Positive Beliefs and Perceptions of Environmentalists. Environ. Commun. 2019, 13, 879–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- More, R. Most Germans Think Recent Climate Protests Go Too Far—Poll. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/business/cop/most-germans-think-recent-climate-protests-go-too-far-poll-2022-11-11/ (accessed on 6 January 2023).
- Wynes, S.; Kotcher, J.; Donner, S.D. Can citizen pressure influence politicians’ communication about climate change? Results from a field experiment. Clim. Chang. 2021, 168, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheidel, A.; Del Bene, D.; Liu, J.; Navas, G.; Mingorría, S.; Demaria, F.; Avila, S.; Roy, B.; Ertör, I.; Temper, L.; et al. Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2020, 63, 102104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auxier, B. Activism on Social Media Varies by Race and Ethnicity, Age, Political Party. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/13/activism-on-social-media-varies-by-race-and-ethnicity-age-political-party/ (accessed on 6 January 2023).
- Smeltz, D.; Sullivan, E.; Wolff, C. Republicans and Democrats in Different Worlds on Climate Change; The Chicago Council on Global Affairs: Chicago, IL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Molder, A.L.; Lakind, A.; Clemmons, Z.E.; Chen, K. Framing the Global Youth Climate Movement: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Greta Thunberg’s Moral, Hopeful, and Motivational Framing on Instagram. Int. J. Press/Politics 2022, 27, 668–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palosaari, E.; Herne, K.; Lappalainen, O.; Hietanen, J.K. Effects of fear on donations to climate change mitigation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2023, 104, 104422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornsey, M.J.; Chapman, C.M.; Oelrichs, D.M. Ripple effects: Can information about the collective impact of individual actions boost perceived efficacy about climate change? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2021, 97, 104217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kesenheimer, J.S.; Greitemeyer, T. Ego or Eco? Neither Ecological nor Egoistic Appeals of Persuasive Climate Change Messages Impacted Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | n (%) |
---|---|
Age, mean (SD) | 33.35 (10.73) |
Race | |
White | 240 (40.07) |
Non-Hispanic Black | 203 (33.89) |
Hispanic | 78 (13.02) |
Asian | 33 (5.51) |
Other | 45 (7.51) |
Sex | |
Male | 314 (52.42) |
Female | 285 (47.58) |
Income | |
Less than USD 60K | 321 (53.59) |
Greater than USD 60K | 278 (46.41) |
Education | |
Associate degree or less | 266 (44.41) |
Bachelor’s degree or higher | 333 (55.59) |
Political Ideology | |
Very Liberal | 171 (28.55) |
Liberal | 178 (29.72) |
Slightly Liberal | 90 (15.03) |
Moderate | 98 (16.36) |
Slightly Conservative | 23 (3.84) |
Conservative | 28 (4.67) |
Very Conservative | 11 (1.84) |
Bivariate Multinomial Logistic Regressions (OR, 95% CI) (Ref: Never Talked about Climate Change Action) | Multivariable Multinomial Logistic Regression (aOR, 95% CI) (Ref: Never Talked about Climate Change Action) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Talked about Climate Change Action More Than a Month Ago | Talked about Climate Change Action in the Past Month | Talked about Climate Change Action More Than a Month Ago | Talked about Climate Change Action in the Past Month | |
Age (years) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) | 1.02 (0.99, 1.04) |
Sex (Ref: Male) | 0.74 (0.49, 1.11) | 0.76 (0.49, 1.17) | 0.62 (0.39, 1.00) | 0.75 (0.44, 1.28) |
Race (Ref: White) | REF | REF | REF | REF |
Non-Hispanic Black | 0.92 (0.57, 1.48) | 0.91 (0.55, 1.51) | 0.89 (0.52, 1.53) | 0.89 (0.49, 1.65) |
Hispanic | 0.96 (0.50, 1.82) | 0.83 (0.41, 1.67) | 1.16 (0.55, 2.43) | 1.25 (0.53, 2.91) |
Asian | 0.81 (0.34, 1.90) | 0.48 (0.17, 1.33) | 0.66 (0.25, 1.75) | 0.49 (0.15, 1.61) |
Other | 1.23 (0.53, 2.86) | 1.06 (0.43, 2.63) | 1.61 (0.64, 4.05) | 1.73 (0.61, 4.90) |
Education (Ref: Associate degree or less) | 1.77 (1.17, 2.66) | 2.38 (1.52, 3.73) | 1.36 (0.84, 2.20) | 1.47 (0.85, 2.55) |
Income (Ref: USD 60K or less) | 1.48 (0.97, 2.24) | 1.99 (1.27, 3.10) | 1.13 (0.69, 1.83) | 1.29 (0.75, 2.24) |
Political orientation (liberal to conservative) | 0.86 (0.75, 0.98) | 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) | 0.92 (0.77, 1.09) | 0.96 (0.79, 1.17) |
Climate change distress | 1.06 (1.01, 1.11) | 1.03 (0.97, 1.08) | 1.07 (1.00, 1.15) | 1.08 (1.01, 1.17) |
Discomfort due to anticipated peer reaction | 1.76 (1.14, 2.71) | 3.24 (1.94, 5.41) | 1.82 (1.12, 2.95) | 3.65 (1.99, 6.68) |
Youth action | 2.22 (1.44, 3.42) | 2.16 (1.36, 3.45) | 1.66 (1.02, 2.72) | 1.35 (0.77, 2.37) |
Barriers to climate change action | 0.87 (0.80, 0.95) | 0.75 (0.68, 0.82) | 0.88 (0.80, 0.97) | 0.78 (0.69, 0.87) |
Family/friends involved in climate change action | 2.71 (1.96, 3.73) | 3.96 (2.82, 5.55) | 2.20 (1.54, 3.12) | 2.81 (1.93, 4.10) |
Family/friends would encourage climate change action | 1.64 (1.35, 1.98) | 2.17 (1.76, 2.66) | 1.28 (1.04, 1.58) | 1.59 (1.26, 2.00) |
Bivariate Multinomial Logistic Regressions (OR, 95% CI) (Ref: Never Texted/Emailed about Climate Change Action) | Multivariable Multinomial Logistic Regression (aOR, 95% CI) (Ref: Never Texted/Emailed about Climate Change Action) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Texted/Emailed about Climate Change Action More Than a Month Ago | Texted/Emailed about Climate Change Action in the Past Month | Texted/Emailed about Climate Change Action More Than a Month Ago | Texted/Emailed about Climate Change Action in the Past Month | |
Age (years) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.02) |
Sex (Ref: Male) | 0.97 (0.68, 1.39) | 0.65 (0.41, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.67, 1.49) | 0.76 (0.44, 1.29) |
Race (Ref: White) | REF | REF | REF | REF |
Non-Hispanic Black | 0.94 (0.62, 1.45) | 1.07 (0.64, 1.77) | 0.97 (0.60, 1.54) | 1.02 (0.56, 1.85) |
Hispanic | 1.90 (1.09, 3.32) | 0.91 (0.41, 2.01) | 2.29 (1.24, 4.22) | 1.26 (0.52, 3.05) |
Asian | 1.82 (0.84, 3.94) | 0.60 (0.17, 2.20) | 1.72 (0.74, 3.98) | 0.82 (0.20, 3.41) |
Other | 0.83 (0.39, 1.77) | 1.22 (0.54, 2.78) | 0.96 (0.43, 2.15) | 1.58 (0.62, 4.02) |
Education (Ref: Associate degree or less) | 1.71 (1.19, 2.47) | 2.30 (1.44, 3.67) | 1.41 (0.93, 2.13) | 1.42 (0.81, 2.49) |
Income (Ref: USD 60K or less) | 1.62 (1.13, 2.33) | 1.71 (1.09, 2.68) | 1.20 (0.80, 1.80) | 0.98 (0.57, 1.70) |
Political orientation (liberal to conservative) | 0.93 (0.82, 1.05) | 1.07 (0.93, 1.23) | 1.01 (0.87, 1.17) | 1.17 (0.97, 1.40) |
Climate change distress | 1.05 (1.00, 1.09) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) | 1.06 (1.00, 1.12) | 1.15 (1.06, 1.24) |
Discomfort due to anticipated peer reaction | 1.23 (0.82, 1.85) | 1.36 (0.81, 2.30) | 1.18 (0.76, 1.84) | 1.41 (0.76, 2.60) |
Youth action | 1.86 (1.24, 2.77) | 1.95 (1.17, 3.26) | 1.35 (0.87, 2.09) | 1.21 (0.67, 2.19) |
Barriers to climate change action | 0.93 (0.86, 1.00) | 0.73 (0.66, 0.81) | 0.93 (0.85, 1.01) | 0.75 (0.66, 0.84) |
Family/friends involved in climate change action | 1.99 (1.58, 2.52) | 3.03 (2.31, 3.97) | 1.79 (1.37, 2.33) | 2.16 (1.59, 2.95) |
Family/friends would encourage climate change action | 1.35 (1.16, 1.58) | 1.89 (1.55, 2.29) | 1.14 (0.96, 1.36) | 1.51 (1.20, 1.90) |
Bivariate Multinomial Logistic Regressions (OR, 95% CI) (Ref: Never Posted or Shared Climate Change Action Posts) | Multivariable Multinomial Logistic Regression (aOR, 95% CI) (Ref: Never Posted or Shared Climate Change Action Posts) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Posted/Shared a Post about Climate Change Action More Than a Month Ago | Posted/Shared a Post about Climate Change Action in the Past Month | Posted/Shared a Post about Climate Change Action More Than a Month Ago | Posted/Shared a Post about Climate Change Action in the Past Month | |
Age (years) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.02 (0.99, 1.04) |
Sex (Ref: Male) | 1.15 (0.80, 1.66) | 1.05 (0.69, 1.59) | 1.23 (0.82, 1.85) | 1.16 (0.71, 1.90) |
Race (Ref: White) | REF | REF | REF | REF |
Non-Hispanic Black | 1.06 (0.69, 1.64) | 1.68 (1.04, 2.70) | 1.05 (0.65, 1.69) | 2.07 (1.19, 3.61) |
Hispanic | 1.51 (0.85, 2.67) | 1.00 (0.48, 2.06) | 1.53 (0.82, 2.87) | 1.22 (0.54, 2.75) |
Asian | 0.65 (0.29, 1.49) | 0.56 (0.20, 1.58) | 0.48 (0.20, 1.18) | 0.56 (0.17, 1.81) |
Other | 1.72 (0.84, 3.52) | 1.07 (0.42, 2.68) | 2.13 (0.98, 4.62) | 1.48 (0.54, 4.08) |
Education (Ref: Associate degree or less) | 1.70 (1.18, 2.47) | 1.70 (1.11, 2.59) | 1.42 (0.93, 2.18) | 0.99 (0.59, 1.65) |
Income (Ref: USD 60K or less) | 1.85 (1.28, 2.69) | 1.76 (1.15, 2.69) | 1.48 (0.97, 2.26) | 1.40 (0.85, 2.33) |
Political orientation (liberal to conservative) | 0.86 (0.76, 0.97) | 0.93 (0.81, 1.06) | 0.88 (0.76, 1.03) | 1.00 (0.84, 1.19) |
Climate change distress | 1.02 (0.98, 1.07) | 1.06 (1.01, 1.12) | 0.98 (0.93, 1.04) | 1.15 (1.07, 1.23) |
Discomfort due to anticipated peer reaction | 1.14 (0.75, 1.72) | 1.23 (0.76, 1.98) | 1.08 (0.69, 1.70) | 1.15 (0.66, 1.99) |
Youth action | 2.49 (1.66, 3.73) | 3.11 (1.90, 5.09) | 2.05 (1.32, 3.18) | 2.03 (1.18, 3.50) |
Barriers to climate change action | 0.99 (0.92, 1.06) | 0.80 (0.74, 0.88) | 1.03 (0.95, 1.12) | 0.82 (0.74, 0.91) |
Family/friends involved in climate change action | 1.63 (1.29, 2.06) | 2.51 (1.95, 3.25) | 1.36 (1.04, 1.78) | 2.00 (1.49, 2.69) |
Family/friends would encourage climate change action | 1.48 (1.27, 1.74) | 1.67 (1.40, 2.00) | 1.29 (1.09, 1.54) | 1.27 (1.03, 1.57) |
Climate Change Communication Actions in the Prior Month Compared to Never Engaging in the Actions | Self-Reported Barriers | Wald | aOR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Posted or shared a post about the need for action on climate change | Activities like letter writing aren’t appealing to me | 15.858 | 0.40 (0.25–0.62) |
Not something I think about a lot * | 16.141 | 0.23 (0.11–0.47) | |
Talked to peers about climate change action | Other people are better at it than I am | 12.574 | 0.43 (0.27–0.69) |
I’m not encouraged to become involved | 8.660 | 0.44 (0.25–0.76) | |
Not something I think about a lot * | 7.276 | 0.45 (0.25–0.80) | |
Texted/emailed peers about climate change action | Other people are better at it than I am | 13.557 | 0.37 (0.22–0.63) |
Activities like letter writing aren’t appealing to me * | 8.842 | 0.47 (0.29–0.77) | |
Not something I think about a lot * | 11.064 | 0.25 (0.12–0.56) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Latkin, C.; Dayton, L.; Bonneau, H.; Countess, K.; Hendrickson, Z.; Vidal, C. Correlates of Climate Change Action Communication Modalities in the United States. Climate 2023, 11, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11060125
Latkin C, Dayton L, Bonneau H, Countess K, Hendrickson Z, Vidal C. Correlates of Climate Change Action Communication Modalities in the United States. Climate. 2023; 11(6):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11060125
Chicago/Turabian StyleLatkin, Carl, Lauren Dayton, Haley Bonneau, Kennedy Countess, Zoé Hendrickson, and Carol Vidal. 2023. "Correlates of Climate Change Action Communication Modalities in the United States" Climate 11, no. 6: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11060125
APA StyleLatkin, C., Dayton, L., Bonneau, H., Countess, K., Hendrickson, Z., & Vidal, C. (2023). Correlates of Climate Change Action Communication Modalities in the United States. Climate, 11(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11060125