Next Article in Journal
A New Family of Consistent and Asymptotically-Normal Estimators for the Extremal Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Forecasting Interest Rates Using Geostatistical Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
A Kolmogorov-Smirnov Based Test for Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Two Sets of Forecasts
 
 
Article

Right on Target, or Is it? The Role of Distributional Shape in Variance Targeting

New Economic School, 100A Novaya Street, Skolkovo, Moscow, 143026, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Fredj Jawadi, Tony S. Wirjanto and Nuttanan Wichitaksorn
Econometrics 2015, 3(3), 610-632; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics3030610
Received: 22 June 2015 / Revised: 22 July 2015 / Accepted: 4 August 2015 / Published: 10 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Financial Econometrics)
Estimation of GARCH models can be simplified by augmenting quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) estimation with variance targeting, which reduces the degree of parameterization and facilitates estimation. We compare the two approaches and investigate, via simulations, how non-normality features of the return distribution affect the quality of estimation of the volatility equation and corresponding value-at-risk predictions. We find that most GARCH coefficients and associated predictions are more precisely estimated when no variance targeting is employed. Bias properties are exacerbated for a heavier-tailed distribution of standardized returns, while the distributional asymmetry has little or moderate impact, these phenomena tending to be more pronounced under variance targeting. Some effects further intensify if one uses ML based on a leptokurtic distribution in place of normal QML. The sample size has also a more favorable effect on estimation precision when no variance targeting is used. Thus, if computational costs are not prohibitive, variance targeting should probably be avoided. View Full-Text
Keywords: GARCH; variance targeting; non-normality; heavy tails; skewness; quasi-maximum likelihood GARCH; variance targeting; non-normality; heavy tails; skewness; quasi-maximum likelihood
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Anatolyev, S.; Khrapov, S. Right on Target, or Is it? The Role of Distributional Shape in Variance Targeting. Econometrics 2015, 3, 610-632. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics3030610

AMA Style

Anatolyev S, Khrapov S. Right on Target, or Is it? The Role of Distributional Shape in Variance Targeting. Econometrics. 2015; 3(3):610-632. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics3030610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anatolyev, Stanislav, and Stanislav Khrapov. 2015. "Right on Target, or Is it? The Role of Distributional Shape in Variance Targeting" Econometrics 3, no. 3: 610-632. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics3030610

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop