Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Compounds and Aroma Profile of Some Lamiaceae Edible Flowers
Previous Article in Journal
Progress and Challenges in the Improvement of Ornamental Plants by Genome Editing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/plants9060690
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Importance of Physiological Traits Vulnerability in Determine Halophytes Tolerance to Salinity Excess: A Comparative Assessment in Atriplex halimus

by
Jesús Alberto Pérez-Romero
1,*,
Enrique Mateos-Naranjo
1,
Javier López-Jurado
1,
Susana Redondo-Gómez
1 and
José M. Torres-Ruiz
2
1
Dpto. de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Av Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
2
INRA, PIAF, Université Clermont-Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(6), 690; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060690
Submission received: 7 May 2020 / Revised: 25 May 2020 / Accepted: 26 May 2020 / Published: 28 May 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Many halophytic physiological traits related to the tolerance of plants to salinity excess have been extensively studied, with a focus on biomass and/or gas exchange parameters. To gain a more complete understanding of whether salinity excess affects the physiological performance of halophytes, an experiment was performed using the halophyte Atriplex halimus L. as a model. A. halimus plants were subjected to two salinity treatments (171 and 513 mM NaCl) over 60 days in a controlled environment. After this period, dry biomass, specific stem conductivity, water potential at turgor loss point, osmotic potential, gas exchange parameters, and the fluorescence of chlorophyll a derived parameters were assessed in order to obtain knowledge about the differences in vulnerability that these parameters can show when subjected to salinity stress. Our results showed a decrease in belowground and aboveground biomass. The decrement in biomass seen at 513 mM NaCl was related to photosynthetic limitations and specific stem conductivity. Turgor loss point did not vary significantly with the increment of salinity. Therefore, the parameter that showed less vulnerability to saline stress was the turgor loss point, with only a 5% decrease, and the more vulnerable trait was the stem conductivity, with a reduction of nearly 50%.

1. Introduction

Halophytes are plant species with the ability to complete their life cycles under at least 200 mM NaCl [1]. There are many physiological mechanisms involved in the capacity of halophytes to cope with salinity excess, and these responses and mechanisms are species-specific in many cases [2].
Among specific tolerance mechanisms, it is well recognized that halophytes use osmoprotective and ion-detoxification strategies [3,4,5] to regulate their tissues’ Na concentration patterns or K/Na ratio variations [2]. Many studies have been carried out to evaluate the effect of salt excess carboxylation capacity and energy use efficiency in halophytes [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], showing how these plants are able to maintain metabolic processes despite being exposed to high salt concentration. However, studies focused on the effect of salt on xylem anatomy and functioning, plant–water relations, and photosynthetic capacity are scarce [13], despite the relevance of these traits to determine plant tolerance to environmental stress [14,15,16]. There have been few attempts to assess the effect of salinity on parameters such as turgor loss point in halophyte species. These studies have assessed the importance of soil-salt water on the water status of Juncus roemerianus [17] and differences in xylem specific conductivity among different mangrove species, in which López-Portillo et al. [18] found different responses in glycophyte and halophyte species.
Cell turgor loss has an impact on cellular structural integrity, metabolism, and whole-plant performance [19,20], being a trait that has been traditionally considered an indicator of plant water stress [21]. Due to the similarities between water and Salinity stress [22], studying how turgor loss point varies in halophytes exposed to salinity stress is important to improve our knowledge about which mechanisms affect these changes. Evaluating how different salt concentrations affect the anatomical properties of xylem and its hydraulic efficiency would also allow us to better understand the response of halophytes to salinity [13].
In addition, it is rare to find a complete analysis of these traits taking into account plant photosynthetic performance parameters to acquire a broader view of some of the main physiological responses of halophytes to excess salinity.
To gain a more complete understanding of whether salinity excess affects the physiological performance of halophytes, the effect of different salt concentrations on the anatomical and functional properties of xylem, plant water status, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence were evaluated in the halophyte Atriplex halimus L.
The Atriplex genus is composed of more than 400 species worldwide [23]. Several species of this genus are well adapted to extreme environmental conditions such as A. hortensis, which is tolerant to high salinity, A. canescens var. angustifolia, which is a drought-tolerant shrub, or A. lentiformis, which can live in seawater irrigation and xeric conditions [24]. Atriplex species could serve as tools for the phytoremediation of polluted, arid, or semi-arid soils [22,25,26,27] or as forage species [27,28,29]. Among them, Atriplex halimus L. is one of the most planted Atriplex species worldwide [22], and therefore represents one of the most important species within this genus. It is a perennial shrub with a C4 photosynthetic metabolic pathway that is able to grow in a wide range of salinity conditions [22]. This characteristic makes it a good candidate for the exhaustive analysis of the effects of salinity excess on plant physiological performance.
Here, we hypothesized that different salinity levels would exert a differential effect on the main physiological plant traits related to tolerance to salinity. Therefore, the possible existence of different vulnerability levels to salt stress in these traits should be considered when determining the salinity tolerance of this species. Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate how different levels of NaCl concentration in growing solution affected the turgor loss point, xylem specific theoretical conductivity, hydraulic mean diameter, vessel density, osmotic potential, and the main leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in order to achieve a more global vision of the physiological performance of A. halimus under different salinity concentrations. The two selected levels were 171 mM NaCl (or 10 g L−1) and a threefold higher one (i.e., 513 mM or 30 g L−1).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Plant Development and Xylem Anatomical and Functional Features

There were significant effects of salinity on the growth, xylem specific theoretical conductivity, and hydraulic mean diameter of Atriplex halimus L. after 60 days of treatment. More specifically, aerial photosynthetic, aerial non-photosynthetic, and root dry mass decreased by 24%, 51%, and 41%, respectively, in plants grown in 513 mM NaCl compared to the control treatment (171 mM NaCl) (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Table 1). Our results agree with other former studies showing that NaCl levels greater than 200 mM induce a significant decrease in the biomass for A. halimus [29,30,31]. However, no effect on growth has been described to date for NaCl concentrations below 600 mM [22,32]. These discrepancies between studies regarding the effect of NaCl concentrations on plant growth have been ascribed to intraspecific variability in growth responses to salinity excess across Atriplex populations, which are distributed in different habitats [32,33,34,35,36].
It is well known that salt stress can affect the anatomy of xylem, which can exert a limitation on plant hydraulic functioning [13,37]. Higher NaCl concentration affected the anatomy, reducing the vessel diameter (Figure 1) and producing a non-significant increase of vessel density (VD) (Figure 2). Moreover, the pith and cortex area increased, and a xylem vessel number decrease was seen at 510 mM NaCl (Figure 1). Thus, no significant differences in VD were observed between the two NaCl concentrations (Figure 2). However, there was a significant reduction in hydraulic mean diameter (dh) for plants grown at 513 mM NaCl (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 2). These variations in the diameter of the xylem vessels between treatments also led to a significant difference in xylem hydraulic functioning between them. The lower values of xylem specific theoretical conductivity (KS) for those plants exposed to higher NaCl concentration (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 2) illustrated this difference in xylem functioning. In line with our results, Boughalleb et al. [13] observed a decrease in vessel diameter for A. halimus grown at 800 mM NaCl, and López-Portillo et al. [18] reported higher KS values for halophyte plants when grown between 3 and 253 mM NaCl and lower values for plants grown beyond that range of salinity.

2.2. Plant–Water Relations Analysis

There were significant effects of salinity on some plant–water relations of Atriplex halimus L. after 60 days of treatment, with lower osmotic potential values (ΨO) for higher NaCl treatment. Plants grown at 171 and 513 mM NaCl showed ΨO values of −4.5 and −6.9 MPa, respectively (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 3B), in concordance with previously reported values for this species [33]. Meanwhile, leaf turgor loss point (ΨTLP) did not vary with NaCl concentration, with mean values of ~−1.70 MPa for both treatments (Figure 3A). ΨTLP has been used to assess physiological abiotic stress tolerance to drought [21], with lower values measured in plants occurring in high salinized habitats [17]. Lower turgor loss point values indicate a wider range of leaf water potentials within which the leaf remains turgid and maintains its function [38,39]. In this sense, lower ΨTLP values have been related to plant ability to maintain stomatal conductance, photosynthetic gas exchange and growth at low soil water potential [38,40,41,42,43]. The osmoregulatory capacity represents an important adaption by plants to salt stress since it allows them to keep taking water from the soil even when exposed to high levels of salt stress [17]. Thus, the capacity of A. halimus to maintain the ΨTLP while reducing ΨO at high NaCl concentrations reflects the capacity of this species to cope with high concentrations of salt.

2.3. Plant Photosynthetic Performance Analysis

Salinity affected some traits related to gas exchange. Thus, net photosynthetic rate (AN) values were significantly lower in plants grown at 513 mM NaCl than in the control plants (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Table 1), while similar values for stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) were observed between NaCl concentration treatments (Table 1). The lack of differences in Ci even with a significant decrement of AN could indicate a greater effect of NaCl increment on the rubisco activity rather than plant CO2 diffusion capacity, as has been described for other halophytes [12,44,45,46].
It has been reported that the impact of NaCl excess on plant photosynthetic performance is related to alterations in photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry machinery efficiency [47]. In fact, several studies have already shown how salinity excess decreased electron chain efficiency along with the ability to use the incident photons [10,48,49], which can lead to a significant decrease in the maximum yield for primary photochemistry [50]. In contrast to these observations, our fluorescence results indicated that Fv/Fm and ΦPSII values did not vary significantly between salinity levels (ANOVA, p > 0.05; Table 1), indicating the high integrity and functionality of its photochemical apparatus under salt excess, as has been previously described for other halophytic species [9].

2.4. Analysis of Differential Traits Vulnerability to Salinity Excess

The tolerance of halophytes to salinity has been intensely studied worldwide, and the characterization of this tolerance has usually been based on specific physiological traits, often combined with detailed plant development analyses [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Many studies have based their tolerance inferences on detailed analyses of plant water status. In fact, ΨTLP has been widely used to assess physiological abiotic stress tolerance, as previously mentioned. Based on this, our ΨTLP values indicated a variation of 5% between 171 and 513 mM NaCl. Together with small variations in other recorded traits linked with plant water status and use efficiency, such as ΨO, gs and iWUE, this indicated a great capacity for A. halimus to tolerate salinity. This was also supported by our results on PSII photochemistry efficiency, since Fv/Fm and ΦPSII did not vary with the increment of salinity. However, these results contrasted with a drastic reduction in plant growth (i.e., almost −40%) under elevated NaCl concentration. This growth response is likely related to the variations observed in other physiological traits, such as plant CO2 assimilation capacity. In this sense, we found that AN decreased circa 30% in plants grown at 513 mM NaCl, this percentage being similar to that registered for plant photosynthetic and root growth. Similarly, the xylem anatomical properties showed a good relationship with plant growth responses. Thus, a reduction in KS of almost 50% was observed for plants grown at 513 mM NaCl compared with plants grown at 171 mM NaCl.
Therefore, our results showed different responses to salinity for those physiological traits involved in carbon assimilation and hydraulic functioning, which were reflected in different growth rates for plants exposed to the higher NaCl concentration. Thus, the capacity of A. halimus to maintain the ΨTLP while reducing ΨO at high NaCl concentration reflects the capacity of this species to cope with high concentrations of salt. More studies evaluating different halophyte species exposed to different NaCl concentrations are therefore required to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of how this abiotic stress affects halophyte performance and to determine plant salt tolerance more precisely. This is vital to avoid possible masking effects that occur when studies are based on assessing a small number of traits focusing exclusively on certain metabolic processes.

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Cuttings of Atriplex halimus L. were collected in April 2018 from different adult individuals (n = 20) that were randomly selected from a well-established population in Odiel Marshes (37°15′ N, 6°58′ O; SW Spain). Cuttings were transported to the laboratory in a refrigerated chamber (4 °C) and immediately planted in individual plastic pots (9 cm high × 11 cm diameter) using perlite as substrate. Then, pots were placed in a greenhouse under controlled conditions: temperature between 21 and 25 °C, 40%–60% relative humidity, and natural daylight of 250 μmol m−2 s−1 as the minimum and 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 as the maximum light flux. Pots were allocated to shallow trays and watered with 20% Hoagland’s solution [51] and 171 mM NaCl. Plants were kept under these conditions until the experimental setup.

3.2. Experimental Treatments

In July 2018, after 3 months of cutting culture, 17 cm high plants showing a completely developed root system were randomly divided into two blocks of 30 plants each. Each block was exposed to different NaCl concentrations: control (171 mM) and elevated concentration (513 mM) for 60 days. Chosen salinities were based on A. halimus soil salinity concentration tolerance, [29,30,31] and can be found in the natural distribution of this species [7]. These NaCl concentrations were established by combining Hoagland’s solution with appropriate amounts of NaCl. At the beginning of the experiment, the pots were placed in plastic trays containing appropriate solutions to a depth of 1 cm. During the experiment, greenhouse conditions were controlled with a temperature of 21–25 °C, 40%–60% relative humidity, and natural daylight of 250 μmol m−2 s−1 as the minimum and 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 as the maximum light flux. NaCl concentration in the growth medium was monitored continuously to avoid changes caused by water evaporation from the nutrient solution. In addition, the entire solution (including NaCl) in the trays was renewed weekly.
After 60 days of exposure to salinity treatments, an exhaustive evaluation of xylem anatomical and functional features were made. This analysis was complemented with measurements of leaf water relations and photosynthetic apparatus performance. Finally, the remaining plants (n = 16, sixteen samples per treatment) were harvested, and belowground and aboveground (photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic) fractions were separated, dried at 80 °C for 48 h, and weighed for dry mass determination.

3.3. Evaluation of Xylem Specific Theoretical Conductivity, Hydraulic Mean Diameter, and Vessel Density

For xylem anatomy characterization, 5 cm long branch samples were randomly collected from plants grown in both salinity treatments (n = 3, three samples per treatment). All samples were collected 10 cm above the base of the tiller and were wrapped in moist paper to keep them well hydrated until sample preparation for sectioning. Samples were firstly fixed in FAA (3.7% formaldehyde, 50% ethanol, 5% acetic acid, and 41.3% water) and then dehydrated through a gradual ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, and 95%). Then, samples were progressively embedded in LR White resin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 4 °C in different resin:ethanol 100% combinations (1/3:2/3; ½:½; 2/3:1/3) for 1 h at 4 °C in pure LR White resin. Finally, samples embedded in the resin were encapsulated in gelatin capsules (size 4) and left for 48 h at 50–55 °C to achieve the polymerization of the resin. In order to obtain thin sections (2 and 3 µm thick), an OmU2 rotary microtome (Reichert, Vienna, Austria) equipped with a histo diamond knife was used. Sections were stained with 1% toluidine blue (w/v). Cross sections were observed under an optical microscope (transmitted light, Zeiss Axioplan 2, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at ×40 magnification. Images were recorded using a digital camera (AxioCam HR, Zeiss) with AxioVision digital imaging software. By using the “mosaic” tool, a single image per sample was constructed by joining images with the same magnification. After spatial calibration, anatomical and functional measurements were performed by image analysis in order to determine vessel density (VD), hydraulically weighted vessel diameter (dh), and theoretical specific xylem hydraulic conductance (KS) for three cross sections per sample using ImageJ software [52]. KS (mmol m−2 MPa−1 s−1) was calculated by adding up the conductivities of the conduits found in the cross section, using the Hagen–Poiseuille equation to calculate the conductivity of every single conduit:
K s = π d 4 128 η A s
where d is the internal diameter of the conduit, η is the dynamic viscosity of water taken as 10−9 MPa s at 20 °C and As is the cross-sectional area.
VD was calculated as the quotient between the xylem area and the number of vessels. Hydraulic mean diameter (dh) was calculated following the Sperry et al. [53] formula:
d h = 2 ∑ r 5 ∑ r 4
where r is the ratio of the vessels.

3.4. Leaf Turgor Loss Point and Osmotic Potential

To test the effect of salinity increment on plant–water relations, we quantified leaf turgor loss point (ΨTLP) and osmotic potential (ΨO) (n = 5, five samples per treatment). For ΨTLP, pressure–volume curves were performed on randomly selected fully developed leaves. Thus, leaves were collected with a razor blade and fully hydrated during 24 h in the dark at 4 °C. After that, leaf water potential and fresh leaf weight were measured every 3 min using a Scholander-type chamber (PMS) and a scale (Mettler-Toledo), respectively, until the leaf water potential reached ca. −4 MPa. Then, leaves were dried at 80 °C for 24 h, and the dry mass was measured [54]. Leaf relative water content (RWC) was determined along with the measurements by the ratio between the dry and fresh weight according to Sack and Pasquet-Kok [55]. The area of each individual leaf was determined by using an LI-3100C area meter (LICOR). Finally, ΨTLP values were obtained after plotting leaf water potential vs. 100 RWC value to determine the point at which the transition between curved and linear portions occurred.
Leaf osmotic potential (ΨO) was determined by freezing small portions of leaf tissue in liquid nitrogen, letting them thaw, and centrifuging (12,000× g, 10 min) at 4 °C in 2 mL tubes. To separate a minimum of 10 µL of leaf sap, we inserted the tops of filter tips into these tubes. ΨO was measured from the extracted sap using the psychrometric technique with a vapor pressure osmometer (5600 Vapro, Wescor, Logan, UT, USA).

3.5. Leaf Gas Exchange

Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured in fully expanded leaves (n = 12, twelve samples per treatment) using an infrared gas analyzer (LI-6400-XT, Li-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) and a modulated fluorimeter (FMS-2; Hansatech Instruments Ltd., King’s Lynn, UK), respectively. Thus, net photosynthetic rate (AN), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and instantaneous water use efficiency (iWUE; ratio between AN and gs) were obtained. The following settings were applied: flux light density of 1000 µmoL photons m−2 s−1 (with 15% blue light to maximize stomatal aperture), ambient CO2 concentration (Ca) of 400 µmoL moL−1 air, leaf temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, 50% ± 5% relative humidity, and vapor pressure deficit of 2.0–3.0 kPa. As Schreiber et al. [56] described, light energy yields of photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers were determined with a saturation pulse method. Thus, the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) and quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) were obtained in light and 30 min dark-adapted leaves at midday (1500 µmoL photons m−2 s−1) using a saturating light pulse of 0.8 s with an intensity of 10,000 µmoL m−2 s−1 according to the protocol followed by Mateos-Naranjo et al. [25].

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The effect of NaCl treatments on xylem anatomical and functional features, as well as on water potential measurements, photosynthetic performance, and growth was determined by using one-way analysis of variance (F-test). Before statistical analysis, Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene tests were used to verify the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances, respectively. All the statistical tests were performed using the statistical software package R.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, J.A.P.-R.; conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, E.M.-N.; methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, J.L.-J.; conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, S.R.-G.; conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, writing—review and editing, J.M.T.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO Project CGL2016-75550-R cofunded by FEDER). J.A. Pérez-Romero thanks Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte for its personal financial support (FPU014/03987).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the University of Seville Greenhouse General Services (CITIUS) for its collaboration and to the INRA-PIAF Clermont-Ferrand staff.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Flowers, T.J.; Hajibagheri, M.A.; Clipson, N.J.W. Halophytes. Q. Rev. Biol. 1986, 61, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Zelm, E.; Zhang, Y.; Testerink, C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 403–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Quintero, F.J.; Ohta, M.; Shi, H.; Zhu, J.-K.; Pardo, J.M. Reconstitution in yeast of the Arabidopsis SOS signaling pathway for Na+ homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9061–9066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R.; Colmer, T.D. Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Slama, I.; M’Rabet, R.; Ksouri, R.; Talbi, O.; Debez, A.; Abdelly, C. Water deficit stress applied only or combined with salinity affects physiological parameters and antioxidant capacity in Sesuvium portulacastrum. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2015, 213, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, M.A.; Ungar, I.A.; Showalter, A.M. Effects of salinity on growth, water relations and ion accumulation of the subtropical perennial halophyte, Atriplex griffithii var. stocksii. Ann. Bot. 2000, 85, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Redondo-Gómez, S.; Wharmby, C.; Castillo, J.M.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Luque, C.J.; De Cires, A.; Enrique Figueroa, M. Growth and photosynthetic responses to salinity in an extreme halophyte, Sarcocornia fruticosa. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 128, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Redondo-Gómez, S.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Davy, A.J.; Fernández-Muñoz, F.; Castellanos, E.M.; Luque, T.; Figueroa, M.E. Growth and photosynthetic responses to salinity of the salt-marsh shrub Atriplex portulacoides. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Redondo-Gómez, S.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Figueroa, M.E.; Davy, A.J. Salt stimulation of growth and photosynthesis in an extreme halophyte, Arthrocnemum macrostachyum. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Silva, J.; Santos, R.; Figueroa, M.E. Effect of prolonged flooding on the invader Spartina densiflora Brong. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 2007, 45, 121–123. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Mesa-Marín, J.; Castellanos, E.M.; Davy, A.J. Salinity alleviates zinc toxicity in the saltmarsh zinc-accumulator Juncus acutus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Idaszkin, Y.L.; Barcia-Piedras, J.M.; Duarte, B.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Caçador, I.; Mateos-Naranjo, E. Disentangling the effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the halophyte Salicornia ramosissima J. Woods physiological performance under optimal and suboptimal saline conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boughalleb, F.; Denden, M.; Tiba, B.B. Anatomical changes induced by increasing NaCl salinity in three fodder shrubs, Nitraria retusa, Atriplex halimus and Medicago arborea. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 2009, 31, 947–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carvajal, M.; Cerda, A.; Martinez, V. Does calcium ameliorate the negative effect of NaCl on melon root water transport by regulating aquaporin activity? New Phytol. 2000, 145, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Li, S.; Liu, J.; An, Y.; Cao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, P. MsPIP2; 2, a novel aquaporin gene from Medicago sativa, confers salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 165, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, R.K.; Shweta, S.; Muthamilarasan, M.; Rani, R.; Prasad, M. Study on aquaporins of Setaria italica suggests the involvement of SiPIP3; 1 and SiSIP1; 1 in abiotic stress response. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2019, 19, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Touchette, B.W. Salt tolerance in a Juncus roemerianus brackish marsh: Spatial variations in plant water relations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2006, 337, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. López-Portillo, J.; Ewers, F.W.; Angeles, G. Sap salinity effects on xylem conductivity in two mangrove species. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kramer, P.J.; Boyer, J.S. Water Relations of Plants and Soils; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  20. McDowell, N.G. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bartlett, M.K.; Scoffoni, C.; Sack, L. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: A global meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Belkheiri, O.; Mulas, M. The effects of salt stress on growth, water relations and ion accumulation in two halophyte Atriplex species. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 86, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Le Houérou, H.N. The role of saltbushes (Atriplex spp.) in arid land rehabilitation in the Mediterranean Basin: A review. Agrofor. Syst. 1992, 18, 107–148. [Google Scholar]
  24. Glenn, E.P.; Nelson, S.G.; Ambrose, B.; Martinez, R.; Soliz, D.; Pabendinskas, V.; Hultine, K. Comparison of salinity tolerance of three Atriplex spp. in well-watered and drying soils. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 83, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Andrades-Moreno, L.; Redondo-Gómez, S. Tolerance to and accumulation of arsenic in the cordgrass Spartina densiflora Brongn. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mesnoua, M.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Barcia-Piedras, J.M.; Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Lotmani, B.; Redondo-Gómez, S. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms preventing Cd-toxicity in the hyperaccumulator Atriplex halimus L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 106, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mesnoua, M.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Barcia-Piedras, J.M.; Lotmani, B.; Redondo-Gómez, S. Combined effect of Cr-toxicity and temperature rise on physiological and biochemical responses of Atriplex halimus L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ratriyanto, A.; Mosenthin, R.; Bauer, E.; Eklund, M. Metabolic, osmoregulatory and nutritional functions of betaine in monogastric animals. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22, 1461–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nedjimi, B.; Guit, B.; Toumi, M.; Beladel, B.; Akam, A.; Daoud, Y. Atriplex halimus subsp. schweinfurthii (Chenopodiaceae): Description and ecology, use as forage and as a therapeutic plant. Fourrages 2013, 216, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  30. Walker, D.J.; Lutts, S. The tolerance of Atriplex halimus L. to environmental stresses. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2014, 26, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Walker, D.J.; Lutts, S.; Sánchez-García, M.; Correal, E. Atriplex halimus L.: Its biology and uses. J. Arid Environ. 2014, 100, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nema Alla, M.M.; Khedr, A.H.A.; Serag, M.M.; Abu-Alnaga, A.Z.; Nada, R.M. Physiological aspects of tolerance in Atriplex halimus L. to NaCl and drought. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bajji, M.; Kinet, J.M.; Lutts, S. Salt stress effects on roots and leaves of Atriplex halimus L. and their corresponding callus cultures. Plant Sci. 1998, 137, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ben Hassine, A.; Bouzid, S.; Lutts, S. Does habitat of Atriplex halimus L. affect plant strategy for osmotic adjustment? Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010, 32, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ben Hassine, A.; Ghanem, M.E.; Bouzid, S.; Lutts, S. An inland and a coastal population of the Mediterranean xero-halophyte species Atriplex halimus L. differ in their ability to accumulate proline and glycinebetaine in response to salinity and water stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 1315–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ben Hassine, A.; Ghanem, M.E.; Bouzid, S.; Lutts, S. Abscisic acid has contrasting effects on salt excretion and polyamine concentrations of an inland and a coastal population of the Mediterranean xero-halophyte species Atriplex halimus. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 925–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Choat, B.; Ball, M.C.; Luly, J.G.; Holtum, J.A. Hydraulic architecture of deciduous and evergreen dry rainforest tree species from north-eastern Australia. Trees 2005, 19, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sack, L.; Cowan, P.D.; Jaikumar, N.; Holbrook, N.M. The ‘hydrology’of leaves: Co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 1343–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Abrams, M.D.; Kubiske, M.E. Photosynthesis and water relations during drought in Acer rubrum L. genotypes from contrasting sites in central Pennsylvania. Funct. Ecol. 1990, 4, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lenz, T.I.; Wright, I.J.; Westoby, M. Interrelations among pressure–volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 127, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baltzer, J.L.; Davies, S.J.; Bunyavejchewin, S.; Noor, N.S.M. The role of desiccation tolerance in determining tree species distributions along the Malay–Thai Peninsula. Funct. Ecol. 2008, 22, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mitchell, P.J.; Veneklaas, E.J.; Lambers, H.; Burgess, S.S. Leaf water relations during summer water deficit: Differential responses in turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure among different plant communities in south-western Australia. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 1791–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Blackman, C.J.; Brodribb, T.J.; Jordan, G.J. Leaf hydraulic vulnerability is related to conduit dimensions and drought resistance across a diverse range of woody angiosperms. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Mesa, J.; Pajuelo, E.; Perez-Martin, A.; Caviedes, M.A.; Rodríguez-Llorente, I.D. Deciphering the role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in the tolerance of the invasive cordgrass Spartina densiflora to physicochemical properties of salt-marsh soils. Plant Soil 2015, 394, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Barcia-Piedras, J.M.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Mateos-Naranjo, E. Impact of short-term extreme temperature events on physiological performance of Salicornia ramosissima J. Woods under optimal and sub-optimal saline conditions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 659. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Duarte, B.; Barcia-Piedras, J.M.; Matos, A.R.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Caçador, I.; Mateos-Naranjo, E. Investigating the physiological mechanisms underlying Salicornia ramosissima response to atmospheric CO2 enrichment under coexistence of prolonged soil flooding and saline excess. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Loreto, F.; Cornic, G.; Sharkey, T.D. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Panda, D.; Rao, D.N.; Sharma, S.G.; Strasser, R.J.; Sarkar, R.K. Submergence effects on rice genotypes during seedling stage: Probing of submergence driven changes of photosystem 2 by chlorophyll a fluorescence induction OJIP transients. Photosynthetica 2006, 44, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Duarte, B.; Santos, D.; Marques, J.C.; Caçador, I. Ecophysiological constraints of two invasive plant species under a saline gradient: Halophytes versus glycophytes. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2015, 167, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kalaji, H.M.; Bosa, K.; Kościelniak, J.; Żuk-Gołaszewska, K. Effects of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 73, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hoagland, D.R.; Arnon, D.I. The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil; Circular 347; California Agricultural Experiment Station: Berkley, CA, USA, 1950; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc2.ark:/13960/t51g1sb8j (accessed on 28 May 2020).
  52. Rasband, W.S. US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2011. Available online: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 28 May 2020).
  53. Sperry, J.S.; Nichols, K.L.; Sullivan, J.E.; Eastlack, S.E. Xylem embolism in ring-porous, diffuse-porous, and coniferous trees of northern Utah and interior Alaska. Ecology 1994, 75, 1736–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Koide, R.T.; Robichaux, R.H.; Morse, S.R.; Smith, C.M. Plant water status, hydraulic resistance and capacitance. In Plant Physiological Ecology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; pp. 161–183. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sack, L.; Pasquet-Kok, J. Leaf Pressure-Volume Curve Parameters. Available online: http://prometheuswiki.publish.csiro.au/tikiindex (accessed on 28 June 2019).
  56. Schreiber, U.; Schliwa, U.; Bilger, W. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth. Res. 1986, 10, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 09 00690 g001 550
Figure 1. Transversal sections of the main stem of Atriplex halimus L. stained with 1% toluidine blue grown at 171 (A) and 513 (B) mM NaCl after 60 d treatment showing E (epidermis), Co (cortex), Xy (xylem vessels), and P (pith cells).
Figure 1. Transversal sections of the main stem of Atriplex halimus L. stained with 1% toluidine blue grown at 171 (A) and 513 (B) mM NaCl after 60 d treatment showing E (epidermis), Co (cortex), Xy (xylem vessels), and P (pith cells).
Plants 09 00690 g001
Plants 09 00690 g002 550
Figure 2. Xylem specific theoretical conductivity, KS (A), vessel density, VD (B), and hydraulic mean diameter, dh (C) in randomly selected primary leaves of Atriplex halimus L. in response to treatment with two NaCl concentrations (171 and 513 mM) after 60 d of treatment. Values represent mean ± SE, n = 3. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different from each other (ANOVA test, p < 0.05) and ns indicates non-significant differences.
Figure 2. Xylem specific theoretical conductivity, KS (A), vessel density, VD (B), and hydraulic mean diameter, dh (C) in randomly selected primary leaves of Atriplex halimus L. in response to treatment with two NaCl concentrations (171 and 513 mM) after 60 d of treatment. Values represent mean ± SE, n = 3. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different from each other (ANOVA test, p < 0.05) and ns indicates non-significant differences.
Plants 09 00690 g002
Plants 09 00690 g003 550
Figure 3. Water potential for turgor loss point, ΨTLP (A) and osmotic potential, Ψ0 (B) in randomly selected primary leaves of Atriplex halimus L. in response to treatment with two NaCl concentrations (171 and 513 mM) after 60 d of treatment. Values represent mean ± SE, n = 5. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different from each other (ANOVA test, p < 0.05) and ns indicates non-significant differences.
Figure 3. Water potential for turgor loss point, ΨTLP (A) and osmotic potential, Ψ0 (B) in randomly selected primary leaves of Atriplex halimus L. in response to treatment with two NaCl concentrations (171 and 513 mM) after 60 d of treatment. Values represent mean ± SE, n = 5. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different from each other (ANOVA test, p < 0.05) and ns indicates non-significant differences.
Plants 09 00690 g003
Table
Table 1. Photosynthetic dry mass, non-photosynthetic dry mass, root dry mass (Rt), net photosynthetic rate (AN), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration, (Ci), intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE), and maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry (Fv/Fm) and quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) of Atriplex halimus L. in response to treatment with 171 and 510 mM NaCl for 60 d. Biomass and physiological parameter values represent mean ± SE, n = 16 and n = 12, respectively. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different between both salinities (ANOVA test, p < 0.05).
Table 1. Photosynthetic dry mass, non-photosynthetic dry mass, root dry mass (Rt), net photosynthetic rate (AN), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration, (Ci), intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE), and maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry (Fv/Fm) and quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) of Atriplex halimus L. in response to treatment with 171 and 510 mM NaCl for 60 d. Biomass and physiological parameter values represent mean ± SE, n = 16 and n = 12, respectively. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different between both salinities (ANOVA test, p < 0.05).
Salinity Concentration
Parameters171 mM510 mM
Photosynthetic dry mass (g)5.98 ± 0.44 a4.55 ± 0.53 b
Non-photosynthetic dry mass (g)5.41 ± 0.53 a2.73 ± 0.44 b
Root dry mass (g)1.48 ± 0.12 a0.89 ± 0.13 b
AN (µmoL m−2 s−1)4.35 ± 0.67 a2.74 ± 0.32 b
gs (mmoL m−2 s−1)53.4 ± 7.47 a46.6 ± 6.49 a
Ci (µmoL mol−1)252.1 ± 30.0 a274.6 ± 23.5 a
iWUE (µmoL mol−1)84.3 ± 12.6 a69.1 ± 11.6 a
Fv/Fm0.70 ± 0.02 a0.70 ± 0.02 a
ΦPSII0.18 ± 0.03 a0.14 ± 0.02 a
a, b show the significant differences between salinities

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; López-Jurado, J.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Torres-Ruiz, J.M. Importance of Physiological Traits Vulnerability in Determine Halophytes Tolerance to Salinity Excess: A Comparative Assessment in Atriplex halimus. Plants 2020, 9, 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060690

AMA Style

Pérez-Romero JA, Mateos-Naranjo E, López-Jurado J, Redondo-Gómez S, Torres-Ruiz JM. Importance of Physiological Traits Vulnerability in Determine Halophytes Tolerance to Salinity Excess: A Comparative Assessment in Atriplex halimus. Plants. 2020; 9(6):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060690

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Romero, Jesús Alberto, Enrique Mateos-Naranjo, Javier López-Jurado, Susana Redondo-Gómez, and José M. Torres-Ruiz. 2020. "Importance of Physiological Traits Vulnerability in Determine Halophytes Tolerance to Salinity Excess: A Comparative Assessment in Atriplex halimus" Plants 9, no. 6: 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060690

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop